EX-99.2
Published on July 30, 2009
Exhibit 99.2
For Immediate News Release
July 29, 2009
July 29, 2009
AVALONBAY COMMUNITIES, INC. ANNOUNCES
SECOND QUARTER 2009 OPERATING RESULTS
SECOND QUARTER 2009 OPERATING RESULTS
(Alexandria, VA) AvalonBay Communities, Inc. (NYSE: AVB) reported today that Net Income
Attributable to Common Stockholders (Net Income) for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 was
$17,674,000. This resulted in Earnings per Share diluted (EPS) of $0.22 for the quarter ended
June 30, 2009, compared to EPS of $1.61 for the comparable period of 2008, a decrease of 86.3%.
For the six months ended June 30, 2009, EPS was $0.82 compared to $2.21 for the comparable period
of 2008, a per share decrease of 62.9%. The decreases are attributable to gains from asset sales
in 2008 not present in 2009, coupled with an impairment recognized in the second quarter of 2009
for land parcels which the Company no longer intends to develop.
Funds from Operations attributable to common stockholders diluted (FFO) for the quarter ended
June 30, 2009 decreased 28.6% to $0.90 per share from $1.26 per share for the comparable period of
2008. FFO per share for the six months ended June 30, 2009 decreased by 13.6% to $2.16 from $2.50
for the comparable period of 2008.
FFO and Net Income for the three months ended June 30, 2009 include the following non-routine
items:
| A non-cash charge of $0.28 per share related to the impairment and abandonment of certain Development Rights the Company no longer plans to pursue; | ||
| A charge of $0.03 per share for severance associated with staff reductions due to a further reduction in the Companys planned development activity as well as general economic conditions; partially offset by | ||
| Proceeds of $0.03 per share from legal settlements. |
Adjusting for these non-routine items, FFO per share would have decreased by
6.3% for the second
quarter of 2009 as compared to the prior year period.
In addition to the items discussed above, FFO and Net Income for the six months ended June 30, 2009
also include the following non-routine items:
| incremental earnings of $0.05 per share due primarily to the recognition of the Companys promoted interest in a joint venture; and | ||
| a gain of $0.01 per share from purchasing medium-term notes at a discount prior to the scheduled maturity. |
Adjusting for these additional non-routine items and the non-routine items in the second quarter,
FFO per share for the six months ended June 30, 2009 would have decreased by 4.8% from the prior
year period.
In addition, the period-over-period per share results are adversely impacted by the 2,627,000
additional shares issued in January 2009 as part of the special dividend declared in the fourth
quarter of 2008.
Commenting on the Companys results, Bryce Blair, Chairman and CEO, said We expect the weak
economy and continued job losses will pressure apartment fundamentals through 2009 and into 2010.
We are taking the necessary actions to ensure our balance sheet and organization are well
positioned to weather near-term challenges and to pursue future opportunities.
Operating Results for the Quarter Ended June 30, 2009 Compared to the Prior Year Period
For the Company, including discontinued operations, total revenue increased by $328,000, or 0.1% to
$222,144,000. For Established Communities, rental revenue decreased 2.8% due to a decrease in
Economic Occupancy of 0.9% and a decrease in Average Rental Rates of 1.9%. As a result, total
revenue for Established Communities decreased
Copyright Ó 2009 AvalonBay Communities, Inc. All Rights Reserved
$4,447,000 to $156,588,000. Operating expenses for
Established Communities increased
$1,681,000, or 3.4% to $51,477,000. Accordingly, Net Operating Income (NOI) for Established
Communities decreased by $6,128,000, or 5.5% to $105,111,000.
The following table reflects the percentage changes in rental revenue, operating expenses and NOI
for Established Communities from the second quarter of 2008 to the second quarter of 2009:
2Q 09 Compared to 2Q 08 | ||||||||||||||||
Rental | Operating | % of | ||||||||||||||
Revenue | Expenses | NOI | NOI (1) | |||||||||||||
New England |
(3.2% | ) | 6.7% | (8.3% | ) | 19.9% | ||||||||||
Metro NY/NJ |
(3.2% | ) | (2.3% | ) | (3.5% | ) | 28.2% | |||||||||
Mid-Atlantic/Midwest |
(1.0% | ) | 4.1% | (3.8% | ) | 16.6% | ||||||||||
Pacific NW |
(2.8% | ) | 7.6% | (6.8% | ) | 4.7% | ||||||||||
No. California |
(2.7% | ) | 4.4% | (5.1% | ) | 20.0% | ||||||||||
So. California |
(4.5% | ) | 6.4% | (8.6% | ) | 10.6% | ||||||||||
Total |
(2.8% | ) | 3.4% | (5.5% | ) | 100.0% | ||||||||||
(1) | Total represents each regions % of total NOI from the Company, including discontinued operations. |
Cash concessions are recognized in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles
(GAAP) and are amortized over the approximate lease term, which is generally one year. The
following table reflects the percentage changes in rental revenue with concessions on a GAAP basis
and Rental Revenue with Concessions on a Cash Basis for our Established Communities:
2Q 09 vs 2Q 08 | ||||
Rental Revenue Change with
Concessions on a GAAP Basis |
(2.8% | ) | ||
Rental Revenue Change with
Concessions on a Cash Basis |
(2.5% | ) | ||
Operating Results for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 Compared to the Prior Year Period
For the Company, including discontinued operations, total revenue increased by $3,820,000, or 0.9%
to $441,823,000. For Established Communities, rental revenue decreased 1.7%, comprised of a
decrease in Average Rental Rates of 0.7% and a decrease in Economic Occupancy of 1.0%. As a
result, total revenue for Established Communities decreased $5,501,000 to $314,667,000, and
operating expenses for Established Communities increased $2,879,000 or 2.9% to $103,523,000.
Accordingly, NOI for Established Communities decreased by $8,380,000, or 3.8% to $211,144,000.
The following table reflects the percentage changes in rental revenue, operating expenses and NOI
for Established Communities for the six months ended June 30, 2009 as compared to the six months
ended June 30, 2008:
YTD 2009 Compared to YTD 2008 | ||||||||||||||||
Rental | Operating | % of | ||||||||||||||
Revenue | Expenses | NOI | NOI (1) | |||||||||||||
New England |
(2.7% | ) | 2.7% | (5.6% | ) | 19.7% | ||||||||||
Metro NY/NJ |
(2.4% | ) | 1.1% | (3.8% | ) | 27.2% | ||||||||||
Mid-Atlantic/Midwest |
(0.1% | ) | 3.7% | (2.2% | ) | 16.7% | ||||||||||
Pacific NW |
(1.1% | ) | 4.2% | (3.3% | ) | 4.8% | ||||||||||
No. California |
(0.5% | ) | 3.0% | (1.7% | ) | 20.7% | ||||||||||
So. California |
(3.6% | ) | 5.6% | (7.1% | ) | 10.9% | ||||||||||
Total |
(1.7% | ) | 2.9% | (3.8% | ) | 100.0% | ||||||||||
(1) | Total represents each regions % of total NOI from the Company, including discontinued operations. |
Development Activity
The Company has not started any new development activity during 2009. For the six months ended June
30, 2009, the Company completed the development of two communities: Avalon Morningside Park,
located in New York, NY and Avalon at the Hingham Shipyard, located in Hingham, MA. These
communities contain an aggregate 530 apartment homes and were completed for an aggregate Total
Capital Cost of $172,500,000.
Redevelopment Activity
During the second quarter of 2009, the Company completed the redevelopment of Essex Place, located
in Peabody, MA and Avalon Mountain View, located in Mountain View, CA. These two communities
contain an aggregate of 534 apartment homes and redevelopment was completed for a Total Capital
Cost of $18,600,000, excluding costs incurred prior to redevelopment.
During the second quarter of 2009, the Company commenced the redevelopment of two communities:
Avalon Pleasanton, located in Pleasanton, CA and Avalon Watch, located in West Windsor, NJ. These
two communities contain an aggregate of 968 apartment homes and will be redeveloped for an
estimated Total Capital Cost of $38,300,000, excluding costs incurred prior to redevelopment.
Investment Management Fund Activity
The Company currently has investments in and serves as the manager for two private, discretionary
investment management vehicles.
AvalonBay Value Added Fund, L.P. (the Fund) is a private, discretionary investment vehicle in
which the Company holds an equity interest of approximately 15%.
AvalonBay Value Added Fund II, L.P. (Fund II) is a private, discretionary investment vehicle with
Copyright Ó 2009 AvalonBay Communities, Inc. All Rights Reserved
commitments from five institutional investors and the Company.
In April 2009, the Company announced the second and final closing of Fund II. In this closing,
total equity commitments to Fund II increased by $67,000,000 as a result of the following:
| a new institutional investor made an equity commitment of $75,000,000; | ||
| an existing institutional investor increased its commitment by $17,000,000, based on terms of its existing commitment; and | ||
| the Company decreased its commitment by $25,000,000, based on terms of its existing commitment, decreasing the Companys equity interest to approximately 31%. |
With the final closing, Fund II equity commitments total $400,000,000 (including the Companys
$125,000,000 commitment). Fund II can employ leverage of up to 65%, allowing for an investment
capacity of approximately $1,100,000,000.
In May 2009, Fund II purchased Verona Apartments, located in Bellevue, WA. Verona Apartments
contains 220 homes and was acquired for a purchase price of $33,100,000, or approximately $150,000
per apartment home.
Financing, Liquidity and Balance Sheet Statistics
At
June 30, 2009, the Company had no amounts outstanding under its $1,000,000,000 unsecured credit
facility and the Company had $456,064,000 in unrestricted cash and cash in escrow. The cash in
escrow is available for development activity and includes $93,440,000 in bond proceeds related to
an existing Development Right that the Company expects to develop in the future. Unencumbered NOI
as a percentage of total NOI generated by real estate assets for the
second quarter of
2009 was
65%. Interest Coverage for the six months ended
June 30, 2009 was 2.9 times.
New Financing Activity
In April 2009, the Company completed a 5.86% fixed rate, pooled secured loan for $741,140,000. The
financing consists of fourteen separate mortgage loans each with a 10-year term. Each loan provides
for payment of interest only during the first and second years of the loan term, with payment of
principal and interest (based on a 30 year amortization schedule) thereafter and the remaining
principal amount and any unpaid interest due at maturity on the tenth anniversary.
Debt Repayment Activity
In May 2009, the Company repaid $19,470,000 in variable rate debt secured by Avalon at Flanders
Hill, located in Westborough, MA.
Also in May 2009, the Company repaid $105,600,000 in unsecured debt, representing the first tranche
of its $330,000,000 unsecured variable rate term loan, pursuant to its scheduled maturity.
Third Quarter and Full Year 2009 Financial Outlook
The Company uses a composite of third party economic forecasts to develop operating and financial
plans, with a particular focus on employment forecasts. Changes in employment conditions have a
significant impact on overall demand for rental housing and are highly correlated to changes in
revenue growth.
During the first six months of 2009, actual job losses materially exceeded those contained in the
economic forecasts used by the Company to prepare its initial 2009 financial outlook. Actual job
losses nationwide through June 2009 totaled 3.2 million, a 70% increase over assumptions
incorporated into the Companys February 2009 outlook. A composite of third party economic forecasts now
projects a year-over-year decline in nationwide employment of 5.4 million jobs for 2009 with
unemployment peaking between 10.5% to 11.0% by mid-2010.
Based on these revised employment projections, revenue from Established Communities is anticipated
to decline by 3.5% to 4.5% for 2009. This compares to the 1.5% to 3.5% decline incorporated into
the original financial outlook in February 2009. The Company now expects a decline in Established
Communities NOI within a range of
6.0% to 8.0%. Changes in these key operating metrics translate into a revised EPS and FFO per share
range as follows:
| Earnings per Share: $2.70 to $2.85 | ||
| Projected FFO per share: $4.15 to $4.30 | ||
| Projected FFO per share growth (at the midpoint of the updated outlook range): 3.7% | ||
| Projected FFO per share decline, as adjusted for non-routine items in 2008 and 2009: 10.6% |
In addition, The Company has expanded its disposition plan for the remainder of 2009 and now
expects full year gross sales proceeds from planned asset dispositions to range from $200,000,000
to $300,000,000.
An analysis of the revised 2009 financial outlook compared to the initial 2009 financial outlook
provided in February follows:
Copyright Ó 2009 AvalonBay Communities, Inc. All Rights Reserved
2009 Financial Outlook | ||||
As of July 2009 | ||||
Changes From February 2009 | ||||
Per | ||||
Share | ||||
FFO (February 2009 Outlook) |
$ | 4.65 | ||
NOI & other income |
(0.16 | ) | ||
Partial cessation of capitalized interest (1) |
(0.04 | ) | ||
G&A reductions, net |
0.05 | |||
Impairments & abandoned pursuits |
(0.28 | ) | ||
FFO (July 2009 Outlook) |
4.22 | |||
(1) | For Development Rights abandoned or not actively under development. |
The Companys 2008 FFO per share of $4.07 included non-recurring items discussed in its fourth
quarter and full year 2008 operating results released in February 2009. The 2009 Projected FFO
includes the non-recurring items discussed on page one of this release, as well as an estimated
charge for additional federal excise taxes for undistributed earnings of approximately $3,200,000.
Adjusting for these non-routine items in both years, the Company expects 2009 Projected FFO per
share to decline by 10.6% at the mid-point of the range. FFO per share is also adversely impacted
by the additional shares from the dividend declared during the fourth quarter of 2008.
For the third quarter of 2009, the Company expects Projected EPS within a range of $0.48 to $0.52.
The Company expects Projected FFO per share for the third quarter of 2009 within a range of $1.07
to $1.11.
Third Quarter 2009 Conference/Event Schedule
The Company expects to release its third quarter 2009 earnings on October 28, 2009 after the market
closes. The Company expects to hold a conference call on October 29, 2009 at 1:00 PM EDT to discuss
the third quarter 2009 results.
The Company is tentatively scheduled to participate in the following conferences during the third
quarter of 2009:
3Q 2009 Conference Schedule | ||
Event/Conference | Date | |
BMO Capital Markets 2009 North American Real Estate Conference |
Sept 9 11 | |
Zelman & Associates 2009 Housing Summit
|
Sept 21 23 | |
Bank of America Merrill Lynch 2009 Global Real Estate Conference |
Sept 30 Oct 1 | |
Management may discuss the Companys current operating environment; operating trends; development,
redevelopment, disposition and acquisition activity; financial outlook and other business and
financial matters affecting the Company. Details on each conference will be available beginning
August 1, 2009 on the Companys website at http://www.avalonbay.com/events.
Other Matters
The Company will hold a conference call on July 30, 2009 at 1:00 PM EDT to review and answer
questions about this release, its second quarter results, the Attachments (described below) and
related matters. To participate on the call, dial 1-877-510-2397 domestically and 1-763-416-6924
internationally.
To hear a replay of the call, which will be available from July 30, 2009 at 2:00 PM EDT to August
6, 2009 at 11:59 PM EDT, dial 1-800-642-1687 domestically and 1-706-645-9291 internationally, and
use Access Code: 17102108.
A webcast of the conference call will also be available at
http://www.avalonbay.com/earnings, and an on-line playback of the webcast will be available
for at least 30 days following the call.
The Company produces Earnings Release Attachments (the Attachments) that provide detailed
information regarding operating, development, redevelopment, disposition and acquisition activity.
These Attachments are considered a part of this earnings release and are available in full with
this earnings release via the Companys website at http://www.avalonbay.com/earnings. To
receive future press releases via e-mail, please submit a request through
http://www.avalonbay.com/email.
About AvalonBay Communities, Inc.
As of June 30, 2009, the Company owned or held a direct or indirect ownership interest in 174
apartment communities containing 50,511 apartment homes in ten states and the District of Columbia,
of which 12 communities were under construction and seven communities were under reconstruction.
The Company is an equity REIT in the business of developing, redeveloping, acquiring and managing
apartment communities in high barrier to entry markets of the United States. More information may
be found on the Companys website at
http://www.avalonbay.com. For additional information, please
contact John Christie, Senior Director of Investor Relations and Research at 1-703-317-4747 or
Thomas J. Sargeant, Chief Financial Officer at 1-703-317-4635.
Forward-Looking Statements
This release, including its Attachments, contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of
Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended. You can identify these forward-looking statements by the Companys use of
words such as expects, plans, estimates, projects,
Copyright Ó 2009 AvalonBay Communities, Inc. All Rights Reserved
intends, believes, outlook and
similar expressions that do not relate to historical matters. Actual results may differ materially
from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements as a result of risks and
uncertainties, which include the following: we may abandon development or redevelopment
opportunities for which we have already incurred costs; adverse capital and credit market
conditions may affect our access to various sources of capital and/or cost of capital, which may
affect our business activities, earnings and common stock price, among other things; changes in
local employment conditions, demand for apartment homes, supply of competitive housing products,
and other economic conditions may result in lower than expected occupancy and/or rental rates and
adversely affect the profitability of our communities; debt and/or equity financing
for development, redevelopment or acquisitions of communities may not be available or may not be
available on favorable terms; we may be unable to obtain, or experience delays in obtaining,
necessary governmental permits and authorizations; increases in costs of materials, labor or other
expenses may result in communities that we develop or redevelop failing to achieve expected
profitability; or delays in completing development, redevelopment and/or lease-up may result in
increased financing and construction costs and may delay and/or reduce the profitability of a
community. Additional discussions of risks and uncertainties appear in the Companys filings with
the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 under the headings Risk Factors and under the heading
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations -
Forward-Looking Statements and in subsequent quarterly reports on Form 10-Q.
The Company does not undertake a duty to update forward-looking statements, including its expected
operating results for the third quarter and full year 2009. The Company may, in its discretion,
provide information in future public announcements regarding its outlook that may be of interest to
the investment community. The format and extent of future outlooks may be different from the
format and extent of the information contained in this release.
Definitions and Reconciliations
Non-GAAP financial measures and other capitalized
terms, as used in this earnings release, are
defined and further explained on Attachment 14, Definitions
and Reconciliations of Non-GAAP
Financial Measures
and Other Terms. Attachment 14 is included in the full earnings release
available at the Companys website at http://www.avalonbay.com/earnings.
Copyright Ó 2009 AvalonBay Communities, Inc. All Rights Reserved
SECOND QUARTER 2009
Supplemental Operating and Financial Data
Avalon Tinton Falls, located in Tinton Falls, NJ, contains 216 apartment homes and was completed in
the third quarter of 2008 for a Total Capital Cost of $41.2 million. The community is conveniently
located just minutes from the Garden State Parkway and nearby beaches.
SECOND QUARTER 2009
Supplemental Operating and Financial Data
Table of Contents
Company Profile |
||
Selected Operating and Other Information |
Attachment 1 | |
Detailed Operating Information |
Attachment 2 | |
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets |
Attachment 3 | |
Sub-Market Profile |
||
Quarterly Revenue and Occupancy Changes (Established Communities) |
Attachment 4 | |
Sequential Quarterly Revenue and Occupancy Changes (Established Communities) |
Attachment 5 | |
Year-to-Date Revenue and Occupancy Changes (Established Communities) |
Attachment 6 | |
Development, Redevelopment, Acquisition and Disposition Profile |
||
Summary of Development and Redevelopment Activity |
Attachment 7 | |
Development Communities |
Attachment 8 | |
Redevelopment Communities |
Attachment 9 | |
Summary of Development and Redevelopment Community Activity |
Attachment 10 | |
Future Development |
Attachment 11 | |
Unconsolidated Real Estate Investments |
Attachment 12 | |
Summary of Disposition Activity |
Attachment 13 | |
Definitions and Reconciliations |
||
Definitions and Reconciliations of Non-GAAP Financial Measures and Other Terms |
Attachment 14 |
The following is a Safe Harbor Statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of
1995 Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The projections and estimates contained in the following
attachments are forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties, and actual results
may differ materially from those projected in such statements. Risks associated with the Companys
development, redevelopment, construction, and lease-up activities, which could impact the
forward-looking statements made are discussed in the paragraph titled Forward-Looking Statements
in the release to which these attachments relate. In particular, development opportunities may be
abandoned; Total Capital Cost of a community may exceed original estimates, possibly making the
community uneconomical and/or affecting projected returns; construction and lease-up may not be
completed on schedule, resulting in increased debt service and construction costs; and other risks
described in the Companys filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the
Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 and the Companys
Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for subsequent quarters.
Attachment 1
AvalonBay Communities, Inc.
Selected Operating and Other Information
June 30, 2009
(Dollars in thousands except per share data)
(unaudited)
Selected Operating and Other Information
June 30, 2009
(Dollars in thousands except per share data)
(unaudited)
SELECTED OPERATING INFORMATION
Q2 | Q2 | YTD | YTD | |||||||||||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | % Change | 2009 | 2008 | % Change | |||||||||||||||||||
Net income attributable to
common stockholders |
$ | 17,674 | $ | 125,159 | (85.9 | %) | $ | 65,099 | $ | 171,433 | (62.0 | %) | ||||||||||||
Per common share basic |
$ | 0.22 | $ | 1.63 | (86.5 | %) | $ | 0.82 | $ | 2.23 | (63.2 | %) | ||||||||||||
Per common share diluted |
$ | 0.22 | $ | 1.61 | (86.3 | %) | $ | 0.82 | $ | 2.21 | (62.9 | %) | ||||||||||||
Funds from Operations |
$ | 71,814 | $ | 97,852 | (26.6 | %) | $ | 172,789 | $ | 193,969 | (10.9 | %) | ||||||||||||
Per common share diluted |
$ | 0.90 | $ | 1.26 | (28.6 | %) | $ | 2.16 | $ | 2.50 | (13.6 | %) | ||||||||||||
Dividends declared common |
$ | 71,339 | $ | 68,760 | 3.8 | % | $ | 142,631 | $ | 137,457 | 3.8 | % | ||||||||||||
Per common share |
$ | 0.8925 | $ | 0.8925 | 0.0 | % | $ | 1.785 | $ | 1.785 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||
Common shares outstanding |
79,931,385 | 77,041,842 | 3.8 | % | 79,931,385 | 77,041,842 | 3.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Outstanding operating partnership
units |
15,351 | 64,019 | (76.0 | %) | 15,351 | 64,019 | (76.0 | %) | ||||||||||||||||
Total outstanding shares and units |
79,946,736 | 77,105,861 | 3.7 | % | 79,946,736 | 77,105,861 | 3.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Average shares outstanding basic |
79,913,565 | 77,004,029 | 3.8 | % | 79,462,086 | 76,972,599 | 3.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Weighted shares basic |
79,662,223 | 76,753,951 | 3.8 | % | 79,210,349 | 76,714,437 | 3.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Average operating partnership units
outstanding |
15,888 | 64,019 | (75.2 | %) | 17,648 | 64,019 | (72.4 | %) | ||||||||||||||||
Effect of dilutive securities |
364,183 | 760,647 | (52.1 | %) | 670,290 | 706,267 | (5.1 | %) | ||||||||||||||||
Average shares outstanding diluted |
80,042,294 | 77,578,617 | 3.2 | % | 79,898,287 | 77,484,723 | 3.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||
DEBT COMPOSITION AND MATURITIES
Average | ||||||||||||||||
Interest | Remaining | |||||||||||||||
Debt Composition (1) | Amount | Rate (2) | Maturities (1) | |||||||||||||
Conventional Debt |
2009 | $ | 139,385 | |||||||||||||
Long-term, fixed rate |
$ | 3,043,674 | 2010 | $ | 281,791 | |||||||||||
Long-term, variable rate |
314,741 | 2011 | $ | 502,224 | ||||||||||||
Variable rate facilities (3) |
| 2012 | $ | 607,782 | ||||||||||||
Subtotal, Conventional |
3,358,415 | 5.5 | % | 2013 | $ | 422,120 | ||||||||||
Tax-Exempt Debt |
||||||||||||||||
Long-term, fixed rate |
164,875 | |||||||||||||||
Long-term, variable rate |
628,548 | |||||||||||||||
Subtotal, Tax-Exempt |
793,423 | 2.9 | % | |||||||||||||
Total Debt |
$ | 4,151,838 | 5.0 | % | ||||||||||||
CAPITALIZED COSTS
Non-Rev | ||||||||||||
Cap | Cap | Capex | ||||||||||
Interest | Overhead | per Home | ||||||||||
Q209 |
$ | 13,677 | $ | 6,610 | $ | 32 | ||||||
Q109 |
$ | 12,368 | $ | 6,507 | $ | 8 | ||||||
Q408 |
$ | 16,996 | $ | 7,836 | $ | 290 | ||||||
Q308 |
$ | 18,803 | $ | 7,753 | $ | 132 | ||||||
Q208 |
$ | 19,159 | $ | 7,590 | $ | 42 |
COMMUNITY INFORMATION
Apartment | ||||||||
Communities | Homes | |||||||
Current Communities |
162 | 46,476 | ||||||
Development Communities |
12 | 4,035 | ||||||
Development Rights |
26 | 6,688 |
(1) | Excludes debt associated with assets classified as held for sale. | |
(2) | Includes costs of financing such as credit enhancement fees, trustees fees, etc. | |
(3) | Represents the Companys $1 billion unsecured credit facility, of which no amount was drawn at June 30, 2009. |
Attachment 2
AvalonBay Communities, Inc.
Detailed Operating Information
June 30, 2009
(Dollars in thousands except per share data)
(unaudited)
Detailed Operating Information
June 30, 2009
(Dollars in thousands except per share data)
(unaudited)
Q2 | Q2 | YTD | YTD | |||||||||||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | % Change | 2009 | 2008 | % Change | |||||||||||||||||||
Revenue: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rental and other income |
$ | 220,067 | $ | 209,612 | 5.0 | % | $ | 438,278 | $ | 412,146 | 6.3 | % | ||||||||||||
Management, development and other fees |
2,077 | 1,579 | 31.5 | % | 3,545 | 3,217 | 10.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total |
222,144 | 211,191 | 5.2 | % | 441,823 | 415,363 | 6.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Direct property operating expenses,
excluding property taxes |
55,546 | 47,650 | 16.6 | % | 108,652 | 95,587 | 13.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Property taxes |
20,731 | 19,018 | 9.0 | % | 42,474 | 38,015 | 11.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Property management and other indirect
operating expenses |
9,634 | 10,471 | (8.0 | %) | 19,678 | 20,568 | (4.3 | %) | ||||||||||||||||
Total operating expenses |
85,911 | 77,139 | 11.4 | % | 170,804 | 154,170 | 10.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Interest expense, net |
(37,385 | ) | (29,598 | ) | 26.3 | % | (66,631 | ) | (57,258 | ) | 16.4 | % | ||||||||||||
General and administrative expense |
(5,390 | ) | (9,383 | ) | (42.6 | %) | (12,637 | ) | (17,503 | ) | (27.8 | %) | ||||||||||||
Joint venture income |
492 | 3,800 | (87.1 | %) | 3,949 | 3,833 | 3.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Investments and investment management expense |
(907 | ) | (1,195 | ) | (24.1 | %) | (1,822 | ) | (2,414 | ) | (24.5 | %) | ||||||||||||
Expensed development and other pursuit costs |
(2,281 | ) | (1,829 | ) | 24.7 | % | (3,375 | ) | (2,329 | ) | 44.9 | % | ||||||||||||
Depreciation expense |
(53,737 | ) | (47,648 | ) | 12.8 | % | (106,377 | ) | (93,589 | ) | 13.7 | % | ||||||||||||
Impairment loss |
(20,302 | ) | | N/A | (20,302 | ) | | N/A | ||||||||||||||||
Income from continuing operations |
16,723 | 48,199 | (65.3 | %) | 63,824 | 91,933 | (30.6 | %) | ||||||||||||||||
Income from discontinued operations (1) |
| 5,101 | (100.0 | %) | | 9,921 | (100.0 | %) | ||||||||||||||||
Gain on sale of communities |
| 74,139 | (100.0 | %) | | 74,139 | (100.0 | %) | ||||||||||||||||
Total discontinued operations |
| 79,240 | (100.0 | %) | | 84,060 | (100.0 | %) | ||||||||||||||||
Net income |
16,723 | 127,439 | (86.9 | %) | 63,824 | 175,993 | (63.7 | %) | ||||||||||||||||
Net (income) expense attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interests |
951 | (105 | ) | N/A | 1,275 | (210 | ) | N/A | ||||||||||||||||
Net income attributable to the Company |
17,674 | 127,334 | (86.1 | %) | 65,099 | 175,783 | (63.0 | %) | ||||||||||||||||
Dividends attributable to preferred stock |
| (2,175 | ) | (100.0 | %) | | (4,350 | ) | (100.0 | %) | ||||||||||||||
Net income attributable to common stockholders |
$ | 17,674 | $ | 125,159 | (85.9 | %) | $ | 65,099 | $ | 171,433 | (62.0 | %) | ||||||||||||
Net income attributable to common stockholders per common share basic |
$ | 0.22 | $ | 1.63 | (86.5 | %) | $ | 0.82 | $ | 2.23 | (63.2 | %) | ||||||||||||
Net income attributable to common stockholders per common share diluted |
$ | 0.22 | $ | 1.61 | (86.3 | %) | $ | 0.82 | $ | 2.21 | (62.9 | %) | ||||||||||||
(1) | Reflects net income for investments in real estate classified as discontinued operations as of June 30, 2009 and investments in real estate sold during the period from January 1, 2008 through June 30, 2009. The following table details income from discontinued operations for the periods shown: |
Q2 | Q2 | YTD | YTD | |||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||
Rental income |
$ | | $ | 10,625 | $ | | $ | 22,640 | ||||||||
Operating and other expenses |
| (3,276 | ) | | (7,090 | ) | ||||||||||
Interest expense, net |
| (546 | ) | | (1,076 | ) | ||||||||||
Depreciation expense |
| (1,702 | ) | | (4,553 | ) | ||||||||||
Income from discontinued operations |
$ | | $ | 5,101 | $ | | $ | 9,921 | ||||||||
Attachment 3
AvalonBay Communities, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Dollars in thousands)
(unaudited)
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Dollars in thousands)
(unaudited)
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
Real estate |
$ | 7,270,874 | $ | 6,895,970 | ||||
Less accumulated depreciation |
(1,458,917 | ) | (1,352,744 | ) | ||||
Net operating real estate |
5,811,957 | 5,543,226 | ||||||
Construction in progress, including land |
783,934 | 867,061 | ||||||
Land held for development |
225,634 | 239,456 | ||||||
Total real estate, net |
6,821,525 | 6,649,743 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
215,788 | 65,706 | ||||||
Cash in escrow |
240,276 | 193,599 | ||||||
Resident security deposits |
27,859 | 29,935 | ||||||
Other assets |
268,870 | 235,370 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 7,574,318 | $ | 7,174,353 | ||||
Unsecured notes, net |
$ | 1,795,590 | $ | 2,002,965 | ||||
Unsecured facilities |
| 124,000 | ||||||
Notes payable |
2,354,298 | 1,547,492 | ||||||
Resident security deposits |
39,436 | 40,603 | ||||||
Other liabilities |
387,563 | 532,944 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
$ | 4,576,887 | $ | 4,248,004 | ||||
Redeemable noncontrolling interests |
6,722 | 10,234 | ||||||
Stockholders equity |
2,990,709 | 2,916,115 | ||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
$ | 7,574,318 | $ | 7,174,353 | ||||
Attachment 4
AvalonBay Communities, Inc.
Quarterly Revenue and Occupancy Changes Established Communities(1)
Quarterly Revenue and Occupancy Changes Established Communities(1)
June 30, 2009
Apartment | Average Rental Rates (2) | Economic Occupancy | Rental Revenue ($000s)(3) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Homes | Q2 09 | Q2 08 | % Change | Q2 09 | Q2 08 | % Change | Q2 09 | Q2 08 | % Change | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
New England |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Boston, MA |
3,289 | $ | 1,969 | $ | 1,971 | (0.1 | %) | 95.8 | % | 97.0 | % | (1.2 | %) | $ | 18,606 | $ | 18,858 | (1.3 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Fairfield-New Haven, CT |
2,518 | 1,952 | 2,048 | (4.7 | %) | 95.5 | % | 96.4 | % | (0.9 | %) | 14,076 | 14,912 | (5.6 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
New England Average |
5,807 | 1,961 | 2,005 | (2.2 | %) | 95.7 | % | 96.7 | % | (1.0 | %) | 32,682 | 33,770 | (3.2 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Metro NY/NJ |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
New Jersey |
2,750 | 2,096 | 2,182 | (3.9 | %) | 95.3 | % | 96.2 | % | (0.9 | %) | 16,487 | 17,327 | (4.8 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
New York, NY |
1,936 | 2,654 | 2,699 | (1.7 | %) | 96.7 | % | 97.3 | % | (0.6 | %) | 14,897 | 15,248 | (2.3 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Long Island, NY |
1,621 | 2,295 | 2,327 | (1.4 | %) | 95.5 | % | 95.8 | % | (0.3 | %) | 10,655 | 10,842 | (1.7 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Metro NY/NJ Average |
6,307 | 2,318 | 2,378 | (2.5 | %) | 95.8 | % | 96.5 | % | (0.7 | %) | 42,039 | 43,417 | (3.2 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mid-Atlantic/Midwest |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Washington Metro |
5,787 | 1,738 | 1,743 | (0.3 | %) | 96.1 | % | 96.9 | % | (0.8 | %) | 28,998 | 29,320 | (1.1 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Chicago, IL |
896 | 1,459 | 1,482 | (1.6 | %) | 96.5 | % | 95.6 | % | 0.9 | % | 3,785 | 3,810 | (0.7 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mid-Atlantic/Midwest Average |
6,683 | 1,701 | 1,706 | (0.3 | %) | 96.1 | % | 96.8 | % | (0.7 | %) | 32,783 | 33,130 | (1.0 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pacific Northwest |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Seattle, WA |
1,943 | 1,312 | 1,328 | (1.2 | %) | 93.7 | % | 95.3 | % | (1.6 | %) | 7,167 | 7,373 | (2.8 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pacific Northwest Average |
1,943 | 1,312 | 1,328 | (1.2 | %) | 93.7 | % | 95.3 | % | (1.6 | %) | 7,167 | 7,373 | (2.8 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Northern California |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
San Jose, CA |
2,734 | 1,930 | 1,965 | (1.8 | %) | 96.3 | % | 96.7 | % | (0.4 | %) | 15,241 | 15,580 | (2.2 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
San Francisco, CA |
1,170 | 2,301 | 2,336 | (1.5 | %) | 94.8 | % | 96.8 | % | (2.0 | %) | 7,655 | 7,935 | (3.5 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Oakland-East Bay, CA |
720 | 1,522 | 1,574 | (3.3 | %) | 96.1 | % | 95.7 | % | 0.4 | % | 3,158 | 3,252 | (2.9 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Northern California Average |
4,624 | 1,960 | 1,997 | (1.9 | %) | 95.8 | % | 96.6 | % | (0.8 | %) | 26,054 | 26,767 | (2.7 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Southern California |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Los Angeles, CA |
1,447 | 1,628 | 1,700 | (4.2 | %) | 93.3 | % | 95.1 | % | (1.8 | %) | 6,593 | 7,017 | (6.0 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Orange County, CA |
1,174 | 1,438 | 1,484 | (3.1 | %) | 92.9 | % | 95.8 | % | (2.9 | %) | 4,705 | 5,006 | (6.0 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
San Diego, CA |
1,058 | 1,504 | 1,479 | 1.7 | % | 92.7 | % | 94.9 | % | (2.2 | %) | 4,434 | 4,458 | (0.5 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Southern California Average |
3,679 | 1,533 | 1,568 | (2.2 | %) | 93.0 | % | 95.3 | % | (2.3 | %) | 15,732 | 16,481 | (4.5 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average/Total Established |
29,043 | $ | 1,881 | $ | 1,917 | (1.9 | %) | 95.5 | % | 96.4 | % | (0.9 | %) | $ | 156,457 | $ | 160,938 | (2.8 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||
(1) | Established Communities are communities with stabilized operating expenses as of January 1, 2008 such that a comparison of 2008 to 2009 is meaningful. | |
(2) | Reflects the effect of concessions amortized over the average lease term. | |
(3) | With concessions reflected on a cash basis, rental revenue from Established Communities decreased 2.5% between years. |
Attachment 5
AvalonBay Communities, Inc.
*Sequential Quarterly* Revenue and Occupancy Changes Established Communities (1)
*Sequential Quarterly* Revenue and Occupancy Changes Established Communities (1)
June 30, 2009
Apartment | Average Rental Rates (2) | Economic Occupancy | Rental Revenue ($000s) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Homes | Q2 09 | Q109 | % Change | Q2 09 | Q109 | % Change | Q2 09 | Q109 | % Change | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
New England |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Boston, MA |
3,289 | $ | 1,969 | $ | 1,982 | (0.7 | %) | 95.8 | % | 94.9 | % | 0.9 | % | $ | 18,606 | $ | 18,571 | 0.2 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Fairfield-New Haven, CT |
2,518 | 1,952 | 1,972 | (1.0 | %) | 95.5 | % | 94.0 | % | 1.5 | % | 14,076 | 13,999 | 0.6 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
New England Average |
5,807 | 1,961 | 1,978 | (0.9 | %) | 95.7 | % | 94.5 | % | 1.2 | % | 32,682 | 32,570 | 0.3 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Metro NY/NJ |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
New Jersey |
2,750 | 2,096 | 2,129 | (1.6 | %) | 95.3 | % | 95.5 | % | (0.2 | %) | 16,487 | 16,783 | (1.8 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
New York, NY |
1,936 | 2,654 | 2,679 | (0.9 | %) | 96.7 | % | 95.7 | % | 1.0 | % | 14,897 | 14,883 | 0.1 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Long Island, NY |
1,621 | 2,295 | 2,311 | (0.7 | %) | 95.5 | % | 93.4 | % | 2.1 | % | 10,655 | 10,500 | 1.5 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Metro NY/NJ Average |
6,307 | 2,318 | 2,345 | (1.2 | %) | 95.8 | % | 95.0 | % | 0.8 | % | 42,039 | 42,166 | (0.3 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mid-Atlantic/Midwest |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Washington Metro |
5,787 | 1,738 | 1,730 | 0.5 | % | 96.1 | % | 96.7 | % | (0.6 | %) | 28,998 | 29,035 | (0.1 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Chicago, IL |
896 | 1,459 | 1,460 | (0.1 | %) | 96.5 | % | 95.5 | % | 1.0 | % | 3,785 | 3,747 | 1.0 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mid-Atlantic/Midwest Average |
6,683 | 1,701 | 1,694 | 0.4 | % | 96.1 | % | 96.5 | % | (0.4 | %) | 32,783 | 32,782 | 0.0 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pacific Northwest |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Seattle, WA |
1,943 | 1,312 | 1,339 | (2.0 | %) | 93.7 | % | 94.5 | % | (0.8 | %) | 7,167 | 7,377 | (2.8 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pacific Northwest Average |
1,943 | 1,312 | 1,339 | (2.0 | %) | 93.7 | % | 94.5 | % | (0.8 | %) | 7,167 | 7,377 | (2.8 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Northern California |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
San Jose, CA |
2,734 | 1,930 | 1,985 | (2.8 | %) | 96.3 | % | 96.7 | % | (0.4 | %) | 15,241 | 15,745 | (3.2 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
San Francisco, CA |
1,170 | 2,301 | 2,347 | (2.0 | %) | 94.8 | % | 96.8 | % | (2.0 | %) | 7,655 | 7,977 | (4.0 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Oakland-East Bay, CA |
720 | 1,522 | 1,571 | (3.1 | %) | 96.1 | % | 96.1 | % | 0.0 | % | 3,158 | 3,262 | (3.2 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Northern California Average |
4,624 | 1,960 | 2,012 | (2.6 | %) | 95.8 | % | 96.7 | % | (0.9 | %) | 26,054 | 26,984 | (3.4 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Southern California |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Los Angeles, CA |
1,447 | 1,628 | 1,661 | (2.0 | %) | 93.3 | % | 93.1 | % | 0.2 | % | 6,593 | 6,711 | (1.8 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Orange County, CA |
1,174 | 1,438 | 1,452 | (1.0 | %) | 92.9 | % | 94.7 | % | (1.8 | %) | 4,705 | 4,845 | (2.9 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
San Diego, CA |
1,058 | 1,504 | 1,517 | (0.9 | %) | 92.7 | % | 94.3 | % | (1.6 | %) | 4,434 | 4,539 | (2.3 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Southern California Average |
3,679 | 1,533 | 1,553 | (1.3 | %) | 93.0 | % | 93.9 | % | (0.9 | %) | 15,732 | 16,095 | (2.3 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average/Total Established |
29,043 | $ | 1,881 | $ | 1,901 | (1.1 | %) | 95.5 | % | 95.4 | % | 0.1 | % | $ | 156,457 | $ | 157,974 | (1.0 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||
(1) | Established Communities are communities with stabilized operating expenses as of January 1, 2008 such that a comparison of 2008 to 2009 is meaningful. | |
(2) | Reflects the effect of concessions amortized over the average lease term. |
Attachment 6
AvalonBay Communities, Inc.
Year-to-Date Revenue and Occupancy Changes Established Communities (1)
Year-to-Date Revenue and Occupancy Changes Established Communities (1)
June 30, 2009
Apartment | Average Rental Rates (2) | Economic Occupancy | Rental Revenue ($000s) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Homes | YTD 09 | YTD 08 | % Change | YTD 09 | YTD 08 | % Change | YTD 09 | YTD 08 | % Change | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
New England |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Boston, MA |
3,289 | $ | 1,976 | $ | 1,958 | 0.9 | % | 95.3 | % | 96.8 | % | (1.5 | %) | $ | 37,176 | $ | 37,387 | (0.6 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Fairfield-New Haven, CT |
2,518 | 1,961 | 2,035 | (3.6 | %) | 94.7 | % | 96.5 | % | (1.8 | %) | 28,076 | 29,671 | (5.4 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
New England Average |
5,807 | 1,970 | 1,991 | (1.1 | %) | 95.1 | % | 96.7 | % | (1.6 | %) | 65,252 | 67,058 | (2.7 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Metro NY/NJ |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
New Jersey |
2,750 | 2,113 | 2,186 | (3.3 | %) | 95.4 | % | 95.9 | % | (0.5 | %) | 33,269 | 34,592 | (3.8 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
New York, NY |
1,936 | 2,666 | 2,674 | (0.3 | %) | 96.2 | % | 96.8 | % | (0.6 | %) | 29,780 | 30,060 | (0.9 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Long Island, NY |
1,621 | 2,303 | 2,310 | (0.3 | %) | 94.4 | % | 96.1 | % | (1.7 | %) | 21,155 | 21,583 | (2.0 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Metro NY/NJ Average |
6,307 | 2,332 | 2,369 | (1.6 | %) | 95.4 | % | 96.2 | % | (0.8 | %) | 84,204 | 86,235 | (2.4 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mid-Atlantic/Midwest |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Washington Metro |
5,787 | 1,734 | 1,734 | 0.0 | % | 96.4 | % | 96.5 | % | (0.1 | %) | 58,033 | 58,067 | (0.1 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Chicago, IL |
896 | 1,460 | 1,466 | (0.4 | %) | 96.0 | % | 96.4 | % | (0.4 | %) | 7,532 | 7,596 | (0.8 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mid-Atlantic/Midwest Average |
6,683 | 1,697 | 1,696 | 0.1 | % | 96.3 | % | 96.5 | % | (0.2 | %) | 65,565 | 65,663 | (0.1 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pacific Northwest |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Seattle, WA |
1,943 | 1,326 | 1,322 | 0.3 | % | 94.1 | % | 95.5 | % | (1.4 | %) | 14,544 | 14,705 | (1.1 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pacific Northwest Average |
1,943 | 1,326 | 1,322 | 0.3 | % | 94.1 | % | 95.5 | % | (1.4 | %) | 14,544 | 14,705 | (1.1 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Northern California |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
San Jose, CA |
2,734 | 1,958 | 1,950 | 0.4 | % | 96.5 | % | 96.9 | % | (0.4 | %) | 30,986 | 30,978 | 0.0 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
San Francisco, CA |
1,170 | 2,324 | 2,320 | 0.2 | % | 95.8 | % | 97.1 | % | (1.3 | %) | 15,633 | 15,813 | (1.1 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Oakland-East Bay, CA |
720 | 1,547 | 1,572 | (1.6 | %) | 96.1 | % | 96.2 | % | (0.1 | %) | 6,419 | 6,533 | (1.7 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Northern California Average |
4,624 | 1,986 | 1,985 | 0.1 | % | 96.2 | % | 96.8 | % | (0.6 | %) | 53,038 | 53,324 | (0.5 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Southern California |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Los Angeles, CA |
1,447 | 1,645 | 1,692 | (2.8 | %) | 93.2 | % | 96.0 | % | (2.8 | %) | 13,304 | 14,086 | (5.6 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Orange County, CA |
1,174 | 1,445 | 1,485 | (2.7 | %) | 93.8 | % | 96.2 | % | (2.4 | %) | 9,550 | 10,063 | (5.1 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
San Diego, CA |
1,058 | 1,509 | 1,476 | 2.2 | % | 93.5 | % | 94.6 | % | (1.1 | %) | 8,973 | 8,874 | 1.1 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Southern California Average |
3,679 | 1,543 | 1,564 | (1.3 | %) | 93.4 | % | 95.7 | % | (2.3 | %) | 31,827 | 33,023 | (3.6 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average/Total Established |
29,043 | $ | 1,891 | $ | 1,905 | (0.7 | %) | 95.4 | % | 96.4 | % | (1.0 | %) | $ | 314,430 | $ | 320,008 | (1.7 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||
(1) | Established Communities are communities with stabilized operating expenses as of January 1, 2008 such that a comparison of 2008 to 2009 is meaningful. | |
(2) | Reflects the effect of concessions amortized over the average lease term. |
Attachment 7
AvalonBay Communities, Inc.
Summary of Development and Redevelopment Activity (1) as of June 30, 2009
Summary of Development and Redevelopment Activity (1) as of June 30, 2009
Number | Number | Total | ||||||||||||||
of | of | Capital Cost (2) | ||||||||||||||
Communities | Homes | (millions) | ||||||||||||||
Portfolio Additions: |
||||||||||||||||
2009 Projected Completions |
(3 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Development |
9 | 2,526 | $ | 820.5 | ||||||||||||
Redevelopment |
(4 | ) | 4 | 926 | 29.6 | |||||||||||
Total Additions |
13 | 3,452 | $ | 850.1 | ||||||||||||
2008 Actual Completions |
||||||||||||||||
Development |
13 | 4,036 | $ | 1,044.3 | ||||||||||||
Redevelopment |
(4 | ) | 6 | 1,213 | 27.8 | |||||||||||
Total Additions |
19 | 5,249 | $ | 1,072.1 | ||||||||||||
Pipeline Activity: |
(3 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Currently Under Construction |
||||||||||||||||
Development |
12 | 4,035 | $ | 1,396.4 | ||||||||||||
Redevelopment |
(4 | ) | 7 | 2,577 | 116.5 | |||||||||||
Subtotal |
19 | 6,612 | $ | 1,512.9 | ||||||||||||
Planning |
||||||||||||||||
Development Rights |
26 | 6,688 | $ | 2,122.0 | ||||||||||||
Total Pipeline |
45 | 13,300 | $ | 3,634.9 | ||||||||||||
(1) | Represents activity for consolidated and unconsolidated entities. | |
(2) | See Attachment #14 Definitions and Reconciliations of Non-GAAP Financial Measures and Other Terms. | |
(3) | Information represents projections and estimates. | |
(4) | Represents only cost of redevelopment activity, does not include original acquisition cost. | |
This chart contains forward-looking statements. Please see the paragraph regarding forward-looking statements on the Table of Contents page relating to the Companys Supplemental Operating and Financial Data for the second quarter of 2009. |
Attachment 8
AvalonBay Communities, Inc.
Development Communities as of June 30, 2009
Development Communities as of June 30, 2009
Percentage | Total | Avg | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ownership | # of | Capital | Schedule | Rent | % Occ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Upon | Apt | Cost (1) | Initial | Stabilized | Per | % Comp | % Leased | Physical | Economic | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Completion | Homes | (millions) | Start | Occupancy | Complete | Ops (1) | Home (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (1) (5) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Inclusive of | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Concessions | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
See Attachment #14 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Under Construction: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1. Avalon White Plains |
100 | % | 407 | $ | 153.0 | Q2 2007 | Q3 2008 | Q4 2009 | Q2 2010 | $ | 2,565 | 74.2 | % | 70.8 | % | 65.8 | % | 45.2 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
White Plains, NY |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2. Avalon Anaheim Stadium |
100 | % | 251 | 102.3 | Q2 2007 | Q4 2008 | Q3 2009 | Q1 2010 | 2,070 | 91.2 | % | 69.3 | % | 60.2 | % | 36.4 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Anaheim, CA |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3. Avalon Union City |
100 | % | 439 | 120.9 | Q3 2007 | Q1 2009 | Q4 2009 | Q2 2010 | 1,575 | 49.7 | % | 49.0 | % | 41.9 | % | 18.3 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Union City, CA |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4. Avalon at Mission Bay North III |
100 | % | 260 | 150.0 | Q4 2007 | Q2 2009 | Q4 2009 | Q2 2010 | 3,255 | 48.8 | % | 44.2 | % | 34.2 | % | 8.2 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
San Francisco, CA |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5. Avalon Irvine (6) |
100 | % | 279 | 77.4 | Q4 2007 | Q2 2009 | Q1 2010 | Q3 2010 | 1,785 | 31.9 | % | 25.1 | % | 16.5 | % | 2.2 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Irvine, CA |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6. Avalon Fort Greene |
100 | % | 631 | 306.8 | Q4 2007 | Q4 2009 | Q1 2011 | Q3 2011 | 3,605 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
New York, NY |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7. Avalon Charles Pond |
100 | % | 200 | 47.8 | Q1 2008 | Q1 2009 | Q3 2009 | Q1 2010 | 1,865 | 88.0 | % | 69.5 | % | 63.0 | % | 37.1 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Coram, NY |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
8. Avalon Blue Hills |
100 | % | 276 | 46.6 | Q2 2008 | Q1 2009 | Q4 2009 | Q2 2010 | 1,430 | 54.3 | % | 49.3 | % | 38.4 | % | 20.5 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Randolph, MA |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9. Avalon Walnut Creek (7) |
100 | % | 422 | 151.7 | Q3 2008 | Q3 2010 | Q1 2011 | Q3 2011 | 2,215 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Walnut Creek, CA |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
10. Avalon Norwalk |
100 | % | 311 | 86.4 | Q3 2008 | Q3 2010 | Q2 2011 | Q4 2011 | 2,260 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Norwalk, CT |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
11. Avalon Northborough I |
100 | % | 163 | 27.4 | Q4 2008 | Q2 2009 | Q4 2009 | Q2 2010 | 1,520 | 40.5 | % | 50.9 | % | 34.4 | % | 10.5 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Northborough, MA |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
12. Avalon Towers Bellevue |
100 | % | 396 | 126.1 | Q4 2008 | Q2 2010 | Q2 2011 | Q4 2011 | 2,390 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bellevue, WA |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total/Weighted Average |
4,035 | $ | 1,396.4 | $ | 2,350 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted Average Projected NOI as a % of Total Capital Cost (1) (8) |
5.7 | % | Inclusive of Concessions See Attachment #14 |
Non-Stabilized Development Communities: (9) |
% Economic | Asset Cost Basis, Non-Stabilized Development: | Source | ||||||||||||||||||
Occ (1) (5) |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Prior Completions: |
Capital Cost, Prior Quarter Completions | $ | 413.0 | Att. 8 | |||||||||||||||||
Avalon Meydenbauer |
368 | $ | 88.1 | Capital Cost, Current Completions | | Att. 8 | |||||||||||||||
Avalon Fashion Valley |
161 | 64.7 | Capital Cost, Under Construction | 1,396.4 | Att. 8 | ||||||||||||||||
Avalon Encino |
131 | 62.2 | Less: Remaining to Invest, Under Construction | ( 395.6 | ) | Att. 10 | |||||||||||||||
Avalon Huntington |
99 | 25.5 | Total Asset Cost Basis, Non-Stabilized Development |
$ | 1,413.8 | ||||||||||||||||
Avalon Morningside Park |
295 | 119.0 | |||||||||||||||||||
Avalon at the Hingham Shipyard |
235 | 53.5 | |||||||||||||||||||
1,289 | $ | 413.0 | 82.7% | ||||||||||||||||||
Q2 2009 Net Operating Income/(Deficit) for communities under construction and non-stabilized development communities was $4.0 million. See Attachment #14. |
(1) | See Attachment #14 Definitions and Reconciliations of Non-GAAP Financial Measures and Other Terms. | |
(2) | Includes apartment homes for which construction has been completed and accepted by management as of July 24, 2009. | |
(3) | Includes apartment homes for which leases have been executed or non-refundable deposits have been paid as of July 24, 2009. | |
(4) | Physical occupancy based on apartment homes occupied as of July 24, 2009. | |
(5) | Represents Economic Occupancy for the second quarter of 2009. | |
(6) | This community was formerly known as Avalon Jamboree Village. | |
(7) | This community is being financed in part by a combination of third-party tax-exempt and taxable debt. | |
(8) | The Weighted Average calculation is based on the Companys pro rata share of the Total Capital Cost for each community. | |
(9) | Represents Development Communities completed in prior quarters that had not achieved Stabilized Operations for the entire current quarter. Estimates are based on the Companys pro rata share of the Total Capital Cost for each community. | |
This chart contains forward-looking statements. Please see the paragraph regarding forward-looking statements on the Table of Contents page relating to the Companys Supplemental Operating and Financial Data for the second quarter of 2009. |
Attachment 9
AvalonBay Communities, Inc.
Redevelopment Communities as of June 30, 2009
Redevelopment Communities as of June 30, 2009
Cost (millions) | Schedule | Avg | Number of Homes | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
# of | Pre- | Total | Rent | Out of | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Percentage | Apt | Redevelopment | Capital | Acquisition / | Restabilized | Per | Completed | Service | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ownership | Homes | Capital Cost | Cost (1)(2) | Completion | Start | Complete | Ops (2) | Home (2) | to date | @ 6/30/09 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Inclusive of | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Concessions | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
See Attachment #14 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Under Redevelopment: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1. Avalon Woodland Hills |
100 | % | 663 | $ | 72.1 | $ | 110.6 | Q4 1997 | Q4 2007 | Q3 2010 | Q1 2011 | $ | 1,725 | 398 | 52 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Woodland Hills, CA |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2. Avalon at Diamond Heights |
100 | % | 154 | 25.3 | 30.6 | Q2 1994 | Q4 2007 | Q4 2010 | Q2 2011 | 2,240 | 64 | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
San Francisco, CA |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3. Avalon Symphony Woods I |
100 | % | 176 | 9.4 | 14.2 | Q4 1986 | Q2 2008 | Q3 2009 | Q1 2010 | 1,435 | 170 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Columbia, MD |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4. Avalon Symphony Woods II |
100 | % | 216 | 36.4 | 42.6 | Q4 2006 | Q2 2008 | Q3 2009 | Q1 2010 | 1,355 | 182 | 5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Columbia, MD |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5. Avalon Burbank (3) |
100 | % | 400 | 71.0 | 94.4 | Q2 2002 | Q3 2008 | Q3 2010 | Q1 2011 | 2,275 | 127 | 9 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Burbank, CA |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6. Avalon Pleasanton |
100 | % | 456 | 63.0 | 80.9 | Q1 1994 | Q2 2009 | Q4 2011 | Q2 2012 | 1,350 | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pleasanton, CA |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7. Avalon Watch |
100 | % | 512 | 30.2 | 50.6 | Q4 1988 | Q2 2009 | Q1 2012 | Q3 2012 | 1,455 | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
West Windsor, NJ |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subtotal |
2,577 | $ | 307.4 | $ | 423.9 | $ | 1,670 | 941 | 72 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Completed this Quarter: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1. Essex Place |
100 | % | 286 | $ | 23.7 | $ | 34.7 | Q3 2004 | Q3 2007 | Q2 2009 | Q4 2009 | $ | 1,290 | 286 | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Peabody, MA |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2. Avalon Mountain View |
88 | % | 248 | 51.6 | 59.2 | Q4 1986 | Q2 2008 | Q2 2009 | Q4 2009 | 1,980 | 248 | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mountain View, CA |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subtotal |
534 | $ | 75.3 | $ | 93.9 | $ | 1,610 | 534 | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Grand Total/Weighted Average |
3,111 | $ | 382.7 | $ | 517.8 | $ | 1,660 | 1,475 | 72 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted Average Projected NOI as a % of Total Capital Cost (2) |
8.2 | % | Inclusive of Concessions See Attachment #14 |
(1) | Inclusive of acquisition cost. | |
(2) | See Attachment #14 Definitions and Reconciliations of Non-GAAP Financial Measures and Other Terms. | |
(3) | This community was formerly known as The Promenade. | |
This chart contains forward-looking statements. Please see the paragraph regarding forward-looking statements on the Table of Contents page relating to the Companys Supplemental Operating and Financial Data for the second quarter of 2009. |
Attachment 10
AvalonBay Communities, Inc.
Summary of Development and Redevelopment Community Activity (1) as of June 30, 2009
(Dollars in Thousands)
Summary of Development and Redevelopment Community Activity (1) as of June 30, 2009
(Dollars in Thousands)
DEVELOPMENT (2)
Apt Homes | Total Capital | Cost of Homes | Construction in | |||||||||||||||||
Completed & | Cost Invested | Completed & | Remaining to | Progress at | ||||||||||||||||
Occupied | During Period (3) | Occupied (4) | Invest (5)(6) | Period End | ||||||||||||||||
Total - 2007 Actual |
2,540 | $ | 966,858 | $ | 664,267 | $ | 1,038,879 | $ | 924,761 | |||||||||||
2008 Actual: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Quarter 1 |
676 | $ | 179,408 | $ | 180,366 | $ | 857,491 | $ | 925,736 | |||||||||||
Quarter 2 |
948 | 178,794 | 226,235 | 1,001,288 | 912,290 | |||||||||||||||
Quarter 3 |
827 | 191,140 | 207,903 | 713,840 | 842,483 | |||||||||||||||
Quarter 4 |
456 | 175,620 | 143,734 | 666,623 | 820,218 | |||||||||||||||
Total - 2008 Actual |
2,907 | $ | 724,962 | $ | 758,238 | |||||||||||||||
2009 Projected: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Quarter 1 (Actual) |
422 | $ | 124,422 | $ | 143,195 | $ | 526,116 | $ | 776,473 | |||||||||||
Quarter 2 (Actual) |
719 | 128,785 | 222,384 | 395,611 | 745,907 | |||||||||||||||
Quarter 3 (Projected) |
789 | 131,860 | 257,569 | 263,751 | 597,000 | |||||||||||||||
Quarter 4 (Projected) |
541 | 94,401 | 187,049 | 169,350 | 493,663 | |||||||||||||||
Total - 2009 Projected |
2,471 | $ | 479,468 | $ | 810,197 | |||||||||||||||
REDEVELOPMENT
Total Capital | Reconstruction in | |||||||||||||||
Avg Homes | Cost Invested | Remaining to | Progress at | |||||||||||||
Out of Service | During Period (3) | Invest (5) | Period End | |||||||||||||
Total - 2007 Actual |
$ | 18,612 | $ | 69,136 | $ | 30,683 | ||||||||||
2008 Actual: |
||||||||||||||||
Quarter 1 |
112 | $ | 6,433 | $ | 65,666 | $ | 37,761 | |||||||||
Quarter 2 |
160 | 11,266 | 75,362 | 46,265 | ||||||||||||
Quarter 3 |
103 | 14,705 | 63,107 | 39,981 | ||||||||||||
Quarter 4 |
52 | 13,514 | 53,214 | 47,362 | ||||||||||||
Total - 2008 Actual |
$ | 45,918 | ||||||||||||||
2009 Projected: |
||||||||||||||||
Quarter 1 (Actual) |
89 | $ | 12,031 | $ | 40,056 | $ | 40,477 | |||||||||
Quarter 2 (Actual) |
75 | 15,983 | 61,157 | 38,027 | ||||||||||||
Quarter 3 (Projected) |
89 | 13,593 | 47,564 | 28,569 | ||||||||||||
Quarter 4 (Projected) |
78 | 9,678 | 37,886 | 25,294 | ||||||||||||
Total - 2009 Projected |
$ | 51,285 | ||||||||||||||
(1) | Data is presented for all communities currently under development or redevelopment. | |
(2) | Projected periods include data for consolidated joint ventures at 100%. The offset for joint venture partners participation is reflected as redeemable noncontrolling interest. | |
(3) | Represents Total Capital Cost incurred or expected to be incurred during the quarter, year or in total. See Attachment #14 Definitions and Reconciliations of Non-GAAP Financial Measures and Other Terms. | |
(4) | Represents projected Total Capital Cost of apartment homes completed and occupied during the quarter. Calculated by dividing Total Capital Cost for each Development Community by number of homes for the community, multiplied by the number of homes completed and occupied during the quarter. | |
(5) | Represents projected Total Capital Cost remaining to invest on communities currently under construction or reconstruction. | |
(6) | Amount for Q2 2009 includes $112.0 million expected to be financed by proceeds from third-party tax-exempt and taxable debt. | |
This chart contains forward-looking statements. Please see the paragraph regarding forward-looking statements on the Table of Contents page relating to the Companys Supplemental Operating and Financial Data for the second quarter of 2009. |
Attachment 11
AvalonBay Communities, Inc.
Future Development as of June 30, 2009
Future Development as of June 30, 2009
DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (1)
Estimated | Total | |||||||
Number | Capital Cost (1) | |||||||
Location of Development Right | of Homes | (millions) | ||||||
1. Rockville Centre, NY Phase I |
210 | $ | 78 | |||||
2. Northborough, MA Phase II |
219 | 43 | ||||||
3. Greenburgh, NY Phase II |
288 | 77 | ||||||
4. West Long Branch, NJ |
180 | 34 | ||||||
5. Plymouth, MA Phase II |
92 | 20 | ||||||
6. Wood-Ridge, NJ |
406 | 92 | ||||||
7. Seattle, WA |
204 | 58 | ||||||
8. Lynnwood, WA Phase II |
82 | 18 | ||||||
9. San Francisco, CA |
173 | 65 | ||||||
10. Wilton, CT |
100 | 30 | ||||||
11. Greenburgh, NY Phase III |
156 | 43 | ||||||
12. Rockville Centre, NY Phase II |
139 | 51 | ||||||
13. New York, NY |
691 | 307 | ||||||
14. Shelton, CT |
251 | 66 | ||||||
15. Roselle Park, NJ |
249 | 54 | ||||||
16. Dublin, CA Phase II |
405 | 126 | ||||||
17. Cohasset, MA |
200 | 38 | ||||||
18. North Bergen, NJ |
164 | 47 | ||||||
19. Brooklyn, NY |
861 | 443 | ||||||
20. Boston, MA |
180 | 97 | ||||||
21. Rockville, MD |
240 | 62 | ||||||
22. Stratford, CT |
130 | 22 | ||||||
23. Yaphank, NY |
343 | 57 | ||||||
24. Tysons Corner, VA |
338 | 87 | ||||||
25. Seattle, WA II |
272 | 81 | ||||||
26. Andover, MA |
115 | 26 | ||||||
Total |
6,688 | $ | 2,122 | |||||
(1) | See Attachment #14 Definitions and Reconciliations of Non-GAAP Financial Measures and Other Terms. |
This chart contains forward-looking statements. Please see the paragraph regarding forward-looking statements on the Table of Contents page
relating to the Companys Supplemental Operating and Financial Data for the second quarter of 2009.
Attachment 12
AvalonBay Communities, Inc.
Unconsolidated Real Estate Investments as of June 30, 2009
(Dollars in Thousands)
Unconsolidated Real Estate Investments as of June 30, 2009
(Dollars in Thousands)
AVB | AVBs | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
# of | Total | Book | Outstanding Debt | Share | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unconsolidated | Percentage | Apt | Capital | Value | Interest | Maturity | of Partnership | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Real Estate Investments | Ownership | Homes | Cost (1) | Investment (2) | Amount | Type | Rate (3) | Date | Debt (4) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
AvalonBay Value Added Fund, LP |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1. Avalon at Redondo Beach Los Angeles, CA |
N/A | 105 | $ | 24,550 | N/A | $ | 21,033 | Fixed | 4.87 | % | Oct 2011 | $ | 3,197 | |||||||||||||||||||
2. Avalon Lakeside Chicago, IL |
N/A | 204 | 18,098 | N/A | 12,056 | Fixed | 5.74 | % | Mar 2012 | 1,833 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
3. Avalon Columbia Baltimore, MD |
N/A | 170 | 29,317 | N/A | 22,275 | Fixed | 5.48 | % | Apr 2012 | 3,386 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
4. Avalon Sunset Los Angeles, CA |
N/A | 82 | 20,830 | N/A | 12,750 | Fixed | 5.41 | % | Feb 2014 | 1,938 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
5. Avalon at Poplar Creek Chicago, IL |
N/A | 196 | 27,991 | N/A | 16,500 | Fixed | 4.83 | % | Oct 2012 | 2,508 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
6. Avalon at Civic Center Norwalk, CA |
N/A | 192 | 42,756 | N/A | 27,001 | Fixed | 5.38 | % | Aug 2013 | 4,104 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
7. Avalon Paseo Place Fremont, CA |
N/A | 134 | 24,889 | N/A | 11,800 | Fixed | 5.74 | % | Nov 2013 | 1,794 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
8. Avalon at Yerba Buena San Francisco, CA |
N/A | 160 | 66,791 | N/A | 41,500 | Fixed | 5.88 | % | Mar 2014 | 6,308 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
9. Avalon at Aberdeen Station Aberdeen, NJ |
N/A | 290 | 58,219 | N/A | 39,842 | Fixed | 5.64 | % | Sep 2013 | 6,056 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
10. The Springs Corona, CA |
N/A | 320 | 48,333 | N/A | 26,000 | Fixed | 6.06 | % | Oct 2014 | 3,952 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
11. Avalon Lombard Lombard, IL |
N/A | 256 | 34,646 | N/A | 17,243 | Fixed | 5.43 | % | Jan 2014 | 2,621 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
12. Avalon Cedar Place Columbia, MD |
N/A | 156 | 24,404 | N/A | 12,000 | Fixed | 5.68 | % | Feb 2014 | 1,824 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
13. Avalon Centerpoint Baltimore, MD |
N/A | 392 | 79,407 | N/A | 45,000 | Fixed | 5.74 | % | Dec 2013 | 6,840 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
14. Middlesex Crossing Billerica, MA |
N/A | 252 | 37,849 | N/A | 24,100 | Fixed | 5.49 | % | Dec 2013 | 3,663 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
15. Avalon Crystal Hill Ponoma, NY |
N/A | 168 | 38,562 | N/A | 24,500 | Fixed | 5.43 | % | Dec 2013 | 3,724 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
16. Skyway Terrace San Jose, CA |
N/A | 348 | 76,255 | N/A | 37,500 | Fixed | 6.11 | % | Mar 2014 | 5,700 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
17. Avalon Rutherford Station East Rutherford, NJ |
N/A | 108 | 36,778 | N/A | 20,240 | Fixed | 6.13 | % | Sep 2016 | 3,076 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
18. South Hills Apartments West Covina, CA |
N/A | 85 | 24,752 | N/A | 11,761 | Fixed | 5.92 | % | Dec 2013 | 1,788 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
19. Weymouth Place Weymouth, MA |
N/A | 211 | 25,170 | N/A | 13,455 | Fixed | 5.12 | % | Mar 2015 | 2,045 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Fund corporate debt |
N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 3,000 | Variable | 1.72 | % | 2009(8) | 456 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
15.2 | % | 3,829 | $ | 739,597 | $ | 108,765 | $ | 439,556 | $ | 66,813 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
AvalonBay Value Added Fund II, LP |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1. Verona Apartments Bellevue, WA |
N/A | 220 | $ | 33,111 | N/A | $ | 21,515 | Fixed | 5.52 | % | Jun 2019 | $ | 6,723 | |||||||||||||||||||
31.25 | % | 220 | $ | 33,111 | $ | 17,186 | $ | 21,515 | $ | 6,723 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Operating Joint Ventures |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1. Avalon Chrystie Place I (5) New York, NY |
20.0 | % | 361 | 128,899 | 25,496 | 117,000 | Variable | 0.24 | % | Nov 2036 | 23,400 | |||||||||||||||||||||
2. Avalon at Mission Bay North II (5) San Francisco, CA |
25.0 | % | 313 | 123,872 | 28,586 | 105,000 | Fixed | 6.02 | % | Dec 2015 | 26,250 | |||||||||||||||||||||
3. Avalon Del Rey Los Angeles, CA |
30.0 | % | 309 | 70,037 | 18,633 | 46,366 | Variable | 3.66 | % | April 2016 | 13,910 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Other Development Joint Ventures |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1. Aria at Hathorne (6) (7) Danvers, MA |
50.0 | % | 64 | N/A | 5,579 | 4,124 | Variable | 2.93 | % | Jun 2010 | $ | 2,062 | ||||||||||||||||||||
1,047 | $ | 322,808 | $ | 78,294 | $ | 272,490 | $ | 65,622 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
5,096 | $ | 1,095,516 | $ | 204,245 | $ | 733,561 | $ | 139,158 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
(1) | See Attachment #14 Definitions and Reconciliations of Non-GAAP Financial Measures and Other Terms. | |
(2) | These unconsolidated real estate investments are accounted for under the equity method of accounting. AVB Book Value Investment represents the Companys recorded equity investment plus the Companys pro rata share of outstanding debt. | |
(3) | Represents weighted average rate on outstanding debt. | |
(4) | The Company has not guaranteed the debt of its unconsolidated investees and bears no responsibility for the repayment, other than the construction completion and related financing guarantee for Avalon Chrystie Place I associated with the construction completion and occupancy certificate. | |
(5) | After the venture makes certain threshold distributions to the third-party partner, the Company generally receives 50% of all further distributions. | |
(6) | The Company has contributed land at a stepped up basis as its only capital contribution to this development. The Company is not guaranteeing the construction or acquisition loans, nor is it responsible for any cost over runs until certain thresholds are satisfied. | |
(7) | After the venture makes certain threshold distributions to the Company, AVB receives 50% of all further distributions. | |
(8) | As of June 30, 2009, these borrowings are drawn under an unsecured credit facility maturing in December 2009. |
Attachment 13
AvalonBay Communities, Inc.
Summary of Disposition Activity (1) as of June 30, 2009
(Dollars in thousands)
Summary of Disposition Activity (1) as of June 30, 2009
(Dollars in thousands)
Weighted | Accumulated | Weighted Average | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of | Average | Gross Sales | Depreciation | Economic | Initial Year | Weighted Average | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Communities Sold | Holding Period (2) | Price | GAAP Gain | and Other | Gain (3) | Mkt. Cap Rate (2) (3) | Unleveraged IRR (2) (3) | |||||||||||||||||||||
1998: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9 Communities |
$ | 170,312 | $ | 25,270 | $ | 23,438 | $ | 1,832 | 8.1 | % | 16.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||
1999: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
16 Communities |
$ | 317,712 | $ | 47,093 | $ | 27,150 | $ | 19,943 | 8.3 | % | 12.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||
2000: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
8 Communities |
$ | 160,085 | $ | 40,779 | $ | 6,262 | $ | 34,517 | 7.9 | % | 15.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||
2001: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7 Communities |
$ | 241,130 | $ | 62,852 | $ | 21,623 | $ | 41,229 | 8.0 | % | 14.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||
2002: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Community |
$ | 80,100 | $ | 48,893 | $ | 7,462 | $ | 41,431 | 5.4 | % | 20.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||
2003: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
12 Communities, 1 Land Parcel (4) |
$ | 460,600 | $ | 184,438 | $ | 52,613 | $ | 131,825 | 6.3 | % | 15.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||
2004: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5 Communities, 1 Land Parcel |
$ | 250,977 | $ | 122,425 | $ | 19,320 | $ | 103,105 | 4.8 | % | 16.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||
2005: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7 Communities, 1 Office Building, 3 Land Parcels (5) |
$ | 382,720 | $ | 199,766 | $ | 14,929 | $ | 184,838 | 3.8 | % | 18.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||
2006: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4 Communities, 3 Land Parcels (6) |
$ | 281,485 | $ | 117,539 | $ | 21,699 | $ | 95,840 | 4.6 | % | 15.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||
2007: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5 Communities, 1 Land Parcel (7) |
$ | 273,896 | $ | 163,352 | $ | 17,588 | $ | 145,764 | 4.6 | % | 17.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||
2008: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
11 Communities (8) |
$ | 646,200 | $ | 288,384 | $ | 56,469 | $ | 231,915 | 5.1 | % | 14.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||
2009: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No sales as of June 30, 2009 |
$ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | ||||||||||||||||||||
1998 - 2009 Total |
7.5 | $ | 3,265,217 | $ | 1,300,791 | $ | 268,553 | $ | 1,032,239 | 5.8 | % | 15.4 | % | |||||||||||||||
(1) | Activity excludes dispositions to joint venture entities in which the Company retains an economic interest. | |
(2) | For purposes of this attachment, land sales and the disposition of an office building are not included in the calculation of Weighted Average Holding Period, Weighted Average Initial Year Market Cap Rate, or Weighted Average Unleveraged IRR. | |
(3) | See Attachment #14 Definitions and Reconciliations of Non-GAAP Financial Measures and Other Terms. | |
(4) | 2003 GAAP gain, for purposes of this attachment, includes $23,448 related to the sale of a community in which the Company held a 50% membership interest. | |
(5) | 2005 GAAP gain includes the recovery of an impairment loss of $3,000 recorded in 2002 related to one of the land parcels sold in 2005. This loss was recorded to reflect the land at fair value based on its entitlement status at the time it was determined to be planned for disposition. | |
(6) | 2006 GAAP gain, for purposes of this attachment, includes $6,609 related to the sale of a community in which the Company held a 25% equity interest. | |
(7) | 2007 GAAP gain, for purposes of this attachment, includes $56,320 related to the sale of a partnership interest in which the Company held a 50% equity interest. | |
(8) | 2008 GAAP gain, for purposes of this attachment, includes $3,483 related to the sale of a community held by the Fund in which the Company holds a 15.2% equity interest. |
Attachment 14
AvalonBay Communities, Inc.
Definitions and Reconciliations of Non-GAAP Financial Measures and Other Terms
Definitions and Reconciliations of Non-GAAP Financial Measures and Other Terms
This release, including its attachments, contains certain non-GAAP financial measures and other
terms. The definition and calculation of these non-GAAP financial measures and other terms may
differ from the definitions and methodologies used by other REITs and, accordingly, may not be
comparable. The non-GAAP financial measures referred to below should not be considered an
alternative to net income as an indication of our performance. In addition, these non-GAAP
financial measures do not represent cash generated from operating activities in accordance with
GAAP and therefore should not be considered as an alternative measure of liquidity or as indicative
of cash available to fund cash needs.
FFO is determined based on a definition adopted by the Board of Governors of the National
Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (NAREIT). FFO is calculated by the Company as Net
Income or loss computed in accordance with GAAP, adjusted for gains or losses on sales of
previously depreciated operating communities, extraordinary gains or losses (as defined by GAAP),
cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle and depreciation of real estate assets,
including adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. Management generally
considers FFO to be an appropriate supplemental measure of operating performance because, by
excluding gains or losses related to dispositions of previously depreciated operating communities
and excluding real estate depreciation (which can vary among owners of identical assets in similar
condition based on historical cost accounting and useful life estimates), FFO can help one compare
the operating performance of a companys real estate between periods or as compared to different
companies. A reconciliation of FFO to Net Income is as follows (dollars in thousands):
Q2 | Q2 | YTD | YTD | |||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||
Net income attributable to the Company |
$ | 17,674 | $ | 127,334 | $ | 65,099 | $ | 175,783 | ||||||||
Dividends attributable to preferred stock |
| (2,175 | ) | | (4,350 | ) | ||||||||||
Depreciation real estate assets,
including discontinued operations
and joint venture adjustments |
54,126 | 50,258 | 107,651 | 100,044 | ||||||||||||
Distributions to noncontrolling
interests, including discontinued operations |
14 | 57 | 39 | 114 | ||||||||||||
Gain on sale of unconsolidated entities
holding previously depreciated real
estate assets |
| (3,483 | ) | | (3,483 | ) | ||||||||||
Gain on sale of previously depreciated
real estate assets |
| (74,139 | ) | | (74,139 | ) | ||||||||||
FFO attributable to common stockholders |
$ | 71,814 | $ | 97,852 | $ | 172,789 | $ | 193,969 | ||||||||
Average shares outstanding diluted |
80,042,294 | 77,578,617 | 79,898,287 | 77,484,723 | ||||||||||||
Earnings per share diluted |
$ | 0.22 | $ | 1.61 | $ | 0.82 | $ | 2.21 | ||||||||
FFO per common share diluted |
$ | 0.90 | $ | 1.26 | $ | 2.16 | $ | 2.50 | ||||||||
Attachment 14 (continued)
Projected FFO, as provided within this release in the Companys outlook, is calculated on a
basis consistent with historical FFO, and is therefore considered to be an appropriate supplemental
measure to projected net income from projected operating performance. A reconciliation of the
range provided for Projected FFO per share (diluted) for the third quarter and full year 2009 to
the range provided for projected EPS (diluted) is as follows:
Low | High | |||||||
range | range | |||||||
Projected EPS (diluted) Q3 09 |
$ | 0.48 | $ | 0.52 | ||||
Projected depreciation (real estate related) |
0.70 | 0.74 | ||||||
Projected gain on sale of operating communities |
(0.11 | ) | (0.15 | ) | ||||
Projected FFO per share (diluted) Q3 09
|
$ | 1.07 | $ | 1.11 | ||||
Projected EPS (diluted) Full Year 2009
|
$ | 2.70 | $ | 2.85 | ||||
Projected depreciation (real estate related) |
2.74 | 2.89 | ||||||
Projected gain on sale of operating communities |
(1.29 | ) | (1.44 | ) | ||||
Projected FFO per share (diluted) Full Year 2009 |
$ | 4.15 | $ | 4.30 | ||||
NOI is defined by the Company as total property revenue less direct property operating
expenses (including property taxes), and excludes corporate-level income (including management,
development and other fees), corporate-level property management and other indirect operating
expenses, investments and investment management expenses, expensed development and other pursuit
costs, net interest expense, general and administrative expense, joint venture income, net income
or expense attributable to noncontrolling interests, depreciation expense, gain on sale of real
estate assets and income from discontinued operations. The Company considers NOI to be an
appropriate supplemental measure to net income of operating performance of a community or
communities because it helps both investors and management to understand the core operations of a
community or communities prior to the allocation of corporate-level property management overhead or
general and administrative costs. This is more reflective of the operating performance of a
community, and allows for an easier comparison of the operating performance of single assets or
groups of assets. In addition, because prospective buyers of real estate have different overhead
structures, with varying marginal impact to overhead by acquiring real estate, NOI is considered by
many in the real estate industry to be a useful measure for determining the value of a real estate
asset or groups of assets.
Attachment 14 (continued)
A reconciliation of NOI (from continuing operations) to Net Income, as well as a breakdown of NOI
by operating segment, is as follows (dollars in thousands):
Q2 | Q2 | YTD | YTD | |||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||
Net income attributable to the Company |
$ | 17,674 | $ | 127,334 | $ | 65,099 | $ | 175,783 | ||||||||
Indirect operating expenses, net of
corporate income |
7,362 | 8,893 | 15,936 | 17,350 | ||||||||||||
Investments and investment management expense |
907 | 1,195 | 1,822 | 2,414 | ||||||||||||
Expensed development and other pursuit costs |
2,281 | 1,829 | 3,375 | 2,329 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense, net |
37,385 | 29,598 | 66,631 | 57,258 | ||||||||||||
General and administrative expense |
5,390 | 9,383 | 12,637 | 17,503 | ||||||||||||
Joint venture income |
(492 | ) | (3,800 | ) | (3,949 | ) | (3,833 | ) | ||||||||
Net income (expense) attributable to
redeemable noncontrolling interests |
(951 | ) | 105 | (1,275 | ) | 210 | ||||||||||
Depreciation expense |
53,737 | 47,648 | 106,377 | 93,589 | ||||||||||||
Impairment loss |
20,302 | | 20,302 | | ||||||||||||
Gain on sale of real estate assets |
| (74,139 | ) | | (74,139 | ) | ||||||||||
Income from discontinued operations |
| (5,101 | ) | | (9,921 | ) | ||||||||||
NOI from continuing operations |
$ | 143,595 | $ | 142,945 | $ | 286,955 | $ | 278,543 | ||||||||
Established: |
||||||||||||||||
New England |
$ | 20,575 | $ | 22,428 | $ | 40,993 | $ | 43,428 | ||||||||
Metro NY/NJ |
29,199 | 30,259 | 57,270 | 59,549 | ||||||||||||
Mid-Atlantic/Midwest |
20,533 | 21,346 | 41,219 | 42,160 | ||||||||||||
Pacific NW |
4,959 | 5,324 | 10,173 | 10,516 | ||||||||||||
No. California |
18,939 | 19,953 | 39,237 | 39,923 | ||||||||||||
So. California |
10,906 | 11,929 | 22,252 | 23,948 | ||||||||||||
Total Established |
105,111 | 111,239 | 211,144 | 219,524 | ||||||||||||
Other Stabilized |
21,543 | 17,026 | 42,715 | 29,103 | ||||||||||||
Development/Redevelopment |
16,941 | 14,680 | 33,096 | 29,916 | ||||||||||||
NOI from continuing operations |
$ | 143,595 | $ | 142,945 | $ | 286,955 | $ | 278,543 | ||||||||
NOI as reported by the Company does not include the operating results from discontinued operations
(i.e., assets sold during the period January 1, 2008 through June 30, 2009). A reconciliation of
NOI from communities sold or classified as discontinued operations to net income for these
communities is as follows (dollars in thousands):
Q2 | Q2 | YTD | YTD | |||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||
Income from discontinued operations |
$ | | $ | 5,101 | $ | | $ | 9,921 | ||||||||
Interest expense, net |
| 546 | | 1,076 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation expense |
| 1,702 | | 4,553 | ||||||||||||
NOI from discontinued operations |
$ | | $ | 7,349 | $ | | $ | 15,550 | ||||||||
NOI from assets sold |
$ | | $ | 7,349 | $ | | $ | 15,550 | ||||||||
NOI from assets held for sale |
| | | | ||||||||||||
NOI from discontinued operations |
$ | | $ | 7,349 | $ | | $ | 15,550 | ||||||||
Attachment 14 (continued)
Projected NOI, as used within this release for certain Development and Redevelopment
Communities and in calculating the Initial Year Market Cap Rate for dispositions, represents
managements estimate, as of the date of this release (or as of the date of the buyers valuation
in the case of dispositions), of projected stabilized rental revenue minus projected stabilized
operating expenses. For Development and Redevelopment Communities, Projected NOI is calculated
based on the first year of Stabilized Operations, as defined below, following the completion of
construction. In calculating the Initial Year Market Cap Rate, Projected NOI for dispositions is
calculated for the first twelve months following the date of the buyers valuation. Projected
stabilized rental revenue represents managements estimate of projected gross potential (based on
leased rents for occupied homes and Market Rents, as defined below, for vacant homes) minus
projected economic vacancy and adjusted for concessions. Projected stabilized operating expenses
do not include interest, income taxes (if any), depreciation or amortization, or any allocation of
corporate-level property management overhead or general and administrative costs. The weighted
average Projected NOI as a percentage of Total Capital Cost is weighted based on the Companys
share of the Total Capital Cost of each community, based on its percentage ownership.
Management believes that Projected NOI of the Development and Redevelopment communities, on an
aggregated weighted average basis, assists investors in understanding managements estimate of the
likely impact on operations of the Development and Redevelopment Communities when the assets are
complete and achieve stabilized occupancy (before allocation of any corporate-level property
management overhead, general and administrative costs or interest expense). However, in this
release the Company has not given a projection of NOI on a company-wide basis. Given the different
dates and fiscal years for which NOI is projected for these communities, the projected allocation
of corporate-level property management overhead, general and administrative costs and interest
expense to communities under development or redevelopment is complex, impractical to develop, and
may not be meaningful. Projected NOI of these communities is not a projection of the Companys
overall financial performance or cash flow. There can be no assurance that the communities under
development or redevelopment will achieve the Projected NOI as described in this release.
Rental Revenue with Concessions on a Cash Basis is considered by the Company to be a
supplemental measure to rental revenue in conformity with GAAP to help investors evaluate the
impact of both current and historical concessions on GAAP based rental revenue and to more readily
enable comparisons to revenue as reported by other companies. In addition, rental revenue (with
concessions on a cash basis) allows an investor to understand the historical trend in cash
concessions.
A reconciliation of rental revenue from Established Communities in conformity with GAAP to rental
revenue (with concessions on a cash basis) is as follows (dollars in thousands):
Q2 | Q2 | |||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
Rental revenue (GAAP basis) |
$ | 156,457 | $ | 160,938 | ||||
Concessions amortized |
2,182 | 1,647 | ||||||
Concessions granted |
(2,231 | ) | (2,178 | ) | ||||
Rental revenue (with
concessions on a cash basis) |
$ | 156,408 | $ | 160,407 | ||||
% change GAAP revenue |
(2.8 | %) | ||||||
% change cash revenue |
(2.5 | %) | ||||||
Economic Gain is calculated by the Company as the gain on sale in accordance with GAAP,
less accumulated depreciation through the date of sale and any other non-cash adjustments that may
be required under GAAP accounting. Management generally considers Economic Gain to be an
appropriate supplemental measure to gain on sale in accordance with GAAP because it helps investors
to understand the relationship between the cash proceeds from a sale and the cash invested in the
sold community. The Economic Gain for each of the communities presented is estimated based on
their respective final settlement statements. A reconciliation of Economic Gain to gain on sale in
accordance with GAAP for both the six months ended June 30, 2009 as well as prior years activities
is presented on Attachment 13.
Interest Coverage is calculated by the Company as EBITDA from continuing operations,
excluding land gains and gain on the sale of investments in real estate joint ventures, divided by
the sum of interest expense, net, and preferred dividends. Interest Coverage is presented by the
Company because it provides rating agencies and investors an additional means of comparing our
ability to service debt obligations to that of other companies.
Attachment 14 (continued)
EBITDA is defined by the Company as net income attributable to the Company before interest income
and expense, income taxes, depreciation and amortization.
A reconciliation of EBITDA and a calculation of Interest Coverage for the second quarter of 2009
are as follows (dollars in thousands):
Net income attributable to the Company |
$ | 17,674 | ||||||
Interest expense, net |
37,385 | |||||||
Depreciation expense |
53,737 | |||||||
EBITDA |
$ | 108,796 | ||||||
Interest expense, net |
37,385 | |||||||
Interest charges |
37,385 | |||||||
Interest coverage |
2.9 | |||||||
Total Capital Cost includes all capitalized costs projected to be or actually incurred to
develop the respective Development or Redevelopment Community, or Development Right, including land
acquisition costs, construction costs, real estate taxes, capitalized interest and loan fees,
permits, professional fees, allocated development overhead and other regulatory fees, all as
determined in accordance with GAAP. For Redevelopment Communities, Total Capital Cost excludes
costs incurred prior to the start of redevelopment when indicated. With respect to communities
where development or redevelopment was completed in a prior or the current period, Total Capital
Cost reflects the actual cost incurred, plus any contingency estimate made by management. Total
Capital Cost for communities identified as having joint venture ownership, either during
construction or upon construction completion, represents the total projected joint venture
contribution amount. For joint ventures not in construction as presented on Attachment 12, Total
Capital Cost is equal to gross real estate cost.
Initial Year Market Cap Rate is defined by the Company as Projected NOI of a single
community for the first 12 months of operations (assuming no repositioning), less estimates for
non-routine allowance of approximately $200 $300 per apartment home, divided by the gross sales
price for the community. Projected NOI, as referred to above, represents managements estimate of
projected rental revenue minus projected operating expenses before interest, income taxes (if any),
depreciation, amortization and extraordinary items. For this purpose, managements projection of
operating expenses for the community includes a management fee of 3.0% 3.5%. The Initial Year
Market Cap Rate, which may be determined in a different manner by others, is a measure frequently
used in the real estate industry when determining the appropriate purchase price for a property or
estimating the value for a property. Buyers may assign different Initial Year Market Cap Rates to
different communities when determining the appropriate value because they (i) may project different
rates of change in operating expenses and capital expenditure estimates and (ii) may project
different rates of change in future rental revenue due to different estimates for changes in rent
and occupancy levels. The weighted average Initial Year Market Cap Rate is weighted based on the
gross sales price of each community.
Unleveraged IRR on sold communities refers to the internal rate of return calculated by the
Company considering the timing and amounts of (i) total revenue during the period owned by the
Company and (ii) the gross sales price net of selling costs, offset by (iii) the undepreciated
capital cost of the communities at the time of sale and (iv) total direct operating expenses during
the period owned by the Company. Each of the items (i), (ii), (iii) and (iv) are calculated in
accordance with GAAP.
The calculation of Unleveraged IRR does not include an adjustment for the Companys general and
administrative expense, interest expense, or corporate-level property management and other indirect
operating expenses. Therefore, Unleveraged IRR is not a substitute for net income as a measure of
our performance. Management believes that the Unleveraged IRR achieved during the period a
community is owned by the Company is useful because it is one indication of the gross value created
by the Companys acquisition, development or redevelopment, management and sale of a community,
before the impact of indirect expenses and Company overhead. The Unleveraged IRR achieved on the
communities as cited in this release should not be viewed as an
indication of the gross value created with respect to other communities owned by the Company, and
the Company does not represent that it will achieve similar Unleveraged IRRs upon the disposition
of other communities. The weighted average Unleveraged IRR for sold communities is weighted based
on all cash flows over the holding period for each respective community, including net sales
proceeds.
Attachment 14 (continued)
Unencumbered NOI as calculated by the Company represents NOI generated by real estate
assets unencumbered by either outstanding secured debt or land leases (excluding land leases with
purchase options that were put in place for governmental incentives or tax abatements) as a
percentage of total NOI generated by real estate assets. The Company believes that current and
prospective unsecured creditors of the Company view Unencumbered NOI as one indication of the
borrowing capacity of the Company. Therefore, when reviewed together with the Companys Interest
Coverage, EBITDA and cash flow from operations, the Company believes that investors and creditors
view Unencumbered NOI as a useful supplemental measure for determining the financial flexibility of
an entity. A calculation of Unencumbered NOI for the six months ended June 30, 2009 is as follows
(dollars in thousands):
NOI for Established Communities |
$ | 211,144 | ||
NOI for Other Stabilized Communities |
42,715 | |||
NOI for Development/Redevelopment Communities |
33,096 | |||
Total NOI generated by real estate assets |
286,955 | |||
NOI on encumbered assets |
100,292 | |||
NOI on unencumbered assets |
186,663 | |||
Unencumbered NOI |
65.0 | % | ||
Established Communities are identified by the Company as communities where a comparison of
operating results from the prior year to the current year is meaningful, as these communities were
owned and had Stabilized Operations, as defined below, as of the beginning of the prior year.
Therefore, for 2009, Established Communities are consolidated communities that have Stabilized
Operations as of January 1, 2008 and are not conducting or planning to conduct substantial
redevelopment activities within the current year. Established Communities do not include
communities that are currently held for sale or planned for disposition during the current year.
Development Communities are communities that are under construction and for which a final
certificate of occupancy has not been received. These communities may be partially complete and
operating.
Redevelopment Communities are communities where the Company owns a majority interest and
where substantial redevelopment is in progress or is planned to begin during the current year.
Redevelopment is considered substantial when capital invested during the reconstruction effort is
expected to exceed either $5,000,000 or 10% of the communitys pre-development basis.
Average Rental Rates are calculated by the Company as rental revenue in accordance with
GAAP, divided by the weighted average number of occupied apartment homes.
Economic Occupancy is defined as total possible revenue less vacancy loss as a percentage
of total possible revenue. Total possible revenue is determined by valuing occupied units at
contract rates and vacant units at Market Rents. Vacancy loss is determined by valuing vacant
units at current Market Rents. By measuring vacant apartments at their Market Rents, Economic
Occupancy takes into account the fact that apartment homes of different sizes and locations within
a community have different economic impacts on a communitys gross revenue.
Market Rents as reported by the Company are based on the current market rates set by the
managers of the Companys communities based on their experience in renting their communities
apartments and publicly available market data. Trends in market rents for a region as reported by
others could vary. Market Rents for a period are based on the average Market Rents during that
period and do not reflect any impact for cash concessions.
Non-Revenue Generating Capex represents capital expenditures that will not directly result
in revenue earnings or expense savings.
Stabilized/Restabilized Operations is defined as the earlier of (i) attainment of 95%
physical occupancy or (ii) the one-year anniversary of completion of development or redevelopment.
Average Rent per Home, as calculated for certain Development and Redevelopment Communities
in lease-up, reflects (i) actual average leased rents for those apartments leased through the end
of the quarter net of estimated stabilized concessions, (ii) estimated market rents net of
comparable concessions for all unleased apartments and (iii) includes actual and estimated other
rental revenue. For Development and Redevelopment Communities not yet in lease-up, Average Rent
per Home reflects managements projected rents.
Attachment 14 (continued)
Development Rights are development opportunities in the early phase of the development
process for which the Company either has an option to acquire land or enter into a leasehold
interest, for which the Company is the buyer under a long-term conditional contract to purchase
land or where the Company owns land to develop a new community. The Company capitalizes related
predevelopment costs incurred in pursuit of new developments for which future development is
probable.