EX-99.2
Published on April 28, 2010
Exhibit 99.2
For Immediate News Release
April 28, 2010
April 28, 2010
AVALONBAY COMMUNITIES, INC. ANNOUNCES
FIRST QUARTER 2010 OPERATING RESULTS
FIRST QUARTER 2010 OPERATING RESULTS
(Arlington, VA) AvalonBay Communities, Inc. (NYSE: AVB) reported today that Net Income
Attributable to Common Stockholders (Net Income) for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 was
$72,523,000. This resulted in Earnings per Share diluted (EPS) of $0.88 for the quarter ended
March 31, 2010, compared to EPS of $0.59 for the comparable period of 2009, an increase of 49.2%.
The increase in the first quarter 2010 EPS over the prior year period is due primarily to gains on
asset sales in the first quarter of 2010, with no comparable activity in 2009.
Funds from Operations attributable to common stockholders diluted (FFO) per share for the
quarter ended March 31, 2010 decreased 24.4% to $0.96 per share from $1.27 per share for the
comparable period of 2009.
The Companys FFO and EPS for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 were adversely impacted by the
severe weather experienced by the East Coast communities (approximately $0.01 per share). The
Company expects second quarter expenses will also be elevated relative to the prior year period due
to repair activity for storm related damage. FFO and EPS for the quarter ended March 31, 2009
included certain non-routine items, as discussed in the Companys first quarter 2009 Earnings
Release. Adjusting for these non-routine items, FFO per share for the three months ended March 31,
2010 would have decreased by 19.8% from the prior year period.
Commenting on the Companys results, Bryce Blair, Chairman and CEO, said Our first quarter results
reflect a recovery in apartment market conditions that is occurring sooner than anticipated.
Declining homeownership, favorable demographics and limited new rental supply are all contributing
to improved fundamentals. We now expect FFO per share for the full year 2010 will be at the high
end of the range provided in our February Financial Outlook.
Operating Results for the Quarter Ended March 31, 2010 Compared to the Prior Year Period
For the Company, including discontinued operations, total revenue decreased by $890,000, or 0.4% to
$218,789,000. For Established Communities, rental revenue decreased 4.2% due to a decrease in
Average Rental Rates of 5.2%, offset somewhat by an increase in Economic Occupancy of 1.0%. As a
result, total revenue for Established Communities decreased $6,865,000 to $159,789,000. Operating
expenses for Established Communities increased $1,549,000, or 2.8% to $56,802,000. Accordingly, NOI
for Established Communities decreased by $8,414,000, or 7.6% to $102,987,000.
The following table reflects the percentage changes in rental revenue, operating expenses and NOI
for Established Communities for the first quarter of 2009 compared to the first quarter of 2010:
1Q 10 Compared to 1Q 09 | ||||||||||||||||
Rental | Operating | % of | ||||||||||||||
Revenue | Expenses | NOI | NOI (1) | |||||||||||||
New England |
(1.8% | ) | 2.9% | (4.6% | ) | 19.8% | ||||||||||
Metro NY/NJ |
(2.8% | ) | (0.9% | ) | (3.5% | ) | 28.0% | |||||||||
Mid-Atlantic/Midwest |
(1.1% | ) | 6.2% | (5.6% | ) | 15.7% | ||||||||||
Pacific NW |
(10.4% | ) | 0.7% | (15.0% | ) | 4.4% | ||||||||||
No. California |
(9.1% | ) | 5.5% | (14.5% | ) | 19.7% | ||||||||||
So. California |
(6.1% | ) | 2.3% | (9.9% | ) | 12.4% | ||||||||||
Total |
(4.2% | ) | 2.8% | (7.6% | ) | 100.0% | ||||||||||
(1) | Total represents each regions % of total NOI from the Company, including discontinued operations. |
Cash concessions are recognized in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles
(GAAP) and are amortized over the approximate lease term, which is generally one year. The
following table reflects the percentage changes in rental revenue with concessions on a GAAP basis
and Rental Revenue with Concessions on a Cash Basis for our Established Communities:
Copyright Ó 2010 AvalonBay Communities, Inc. All Rights Reserved
1Q 10 vs 1Q 09 | ||||
Rental Revenue Change with
Concessions on a GAAP Basis |
(4.2% | ) | ||
Rental Revenue Change with
Concessions on a Cash Basis |
(4.0% | ) | ||
Development Activity
During the first quarter of 2010, the Company commenced the development of Avalon Rockville Centre,
located in Rockville Centre, NY. Avalon Rockville Centre will contain 349 apartment homes when
completed for an estimated Total Capital Cost of $110,700,000.
During the first quarter of 2010, the Company completed the development of Avalon Irvine, located
in Irvine, CA. Avalon Irvine contains 279 apartment homes and was completed for a Total Capital
Cost of $77,400,000.
Disposition Activity
During the first quarter of 2010, the Company sold two communities: Avalon at Danada Farms, located
in Wheaton, IL and Avalon Knoll, located in Germantown, MD. The Company acquired Avalon at Danada
Farms in 1997. Avalon Knoll was developed by predecessors of the Company, and was acquired by the
Company in 1993. In the aggregate, these two communities contain 595 apartment homes and were sold
for $82,950,000. These dispositions resulted in a gain in accordance with GAAP of $50,291,000 and
an Economic Gain of $33,151,000. The weighted average Initial Year Market Cap Rate for these two
communities was 6.6% and the Unleveraged IRR over a 14 year average holding period was 9.8%.
In April 2010, the Company sold Avalon on the Sound, a 412 apartment home community, located in New
Rochelle, NY for $107,500,000. The Company continues to own and operate Avalon on the Sound East, a
588 apartment home community adjacent to Avalon on the Sound.
Investment Management Fund Activity
The Company currently has investments in and serves as the manager for two private, discretionary
investment management vehicles.
In February 2010, Fund II purchased its third community, located in Gaithersburg, MD. The
garden-style community, renamed Avalon Rothbury, contains 203 homes and was acquired for a purchase
price of $31,250,000 or approximately $154,000 per apartment home.
Financing, Liquidity and Balance Sheet Statistics
At March 31, 2010, the Company had no amounts outstanding under its $1,000,000,000 unsecured credit
facility and the Company had $330,633,000 in unrestricted cash and cash in escrow. The cash in
escrow is available for development activity and includes $93,440,000 in bond proceeds related to
an existing Development Right that the Company expects to develop in the future. Unencumbered NOI
as a percentage of total NOI generated by real estate assets for the three months ended March 31,
2010 was 67%. Interest Coverage for the first quarter of 2010 was 2.8 times.
New Financing Activity
During the first quarter of 2010, the Company sold 891,685 shares of common stock under the
continuous equity offering program commenced in August 2009, at an average price of approximately
$84 per share, for net proceeds of $73,870,000.
Debt Repayment Activity
In February 2010, the Company repaid a 6.47% fixed rate secured mortgage note in the amount of
$13,961,000 in advance of its March 2012 scheduled maturity date.
In March 2010, the Company repaid a 6.95% fixed rate secured mortgage note in the amount of
$11,226,000 in advance of its February 2025 scheduled maturity date.
The Company recorded a
charge of approximately $700,000 related to the accelerated recognition of deferred financing costs for these notes.
Second Quarter 2010 Financial Outlook
First Quarter results were better than anticipated and the Company now expects apartment
fundamentals will continue to improve at a faster pace than originally assumed in its initial 2010
Financial Outlook provided in February 2010. Accordingly, the Company now expects rental revenue
and NOI changes will be favorable compared to the initial February outlook and will likely be
outside the original ranges provided in February. Full year 2010 FFO per share will likely be at
the high end of the range provided in the initial February outlook. The Company will provide
revised ranges for rental revenue, NOI and FFO per share in the mid-year update to the 2010
Financial Outlook that will be included as a part of the Second Quarter 2010 earnings announcement
scheduled to be released in August 2010.
For the second quarter of 2010, the
Company expects EPS in the range of $0.50 to $0.56 and
expects Projected FFO per share in the range of $0.93 to $0.97.
Copyright Ó 2010 AvalonBay Communities, Inc. All Rights Reserved
The Company expects to release its second quarter 2010 earnings on August 3, 2010 after the market
closes. The Company expects to hold a conference call on August 4, 2010 at 1:00 PM EDT to discuss
the second quarter 2010 results.
Second Quarter 2010 Conference/Event Schedule
The Company is scheduled to participate in the NAREIT Institutional Investor Forum in Chicago, IL,
from June 9-11, 2010. The Company will present and conduct a question and answer session at the
conference. Management may discuss the Companys current operating environment; operating trends;
development, redevelopment, disposition and acquisition activity; financial outlook and other
business and financial matters affecting the Company. Details on how to access the webcast and
related materials will be available beginning June 1, 2010 on the Companys website at
http://www.avalonbay.com/events.
Expanded Disclosure
In this earnings release, the Company included expanded disclosure of the operating results for its
direct and indirect investments in apartment communities, included as Attachment 4, Sequential
Operating Information by Business Segment. In addition, the Company has provided additional
disclosure of the direct operating expenses for the Established Community portfolio, included as
Attachment 7, Operating Expenses (Opex) Established Communities.
Other Matters
The Company will hold a conference call on April 29, 2010 at 1:00 PM EDT to review and answer
questions about this release, its first quarter results, the Attachments (described below) and
related matters. To participate on the call, dial 1-877-510-2397 domestically and 1-763-416-6924
internationally.
To hear a replay of the call, which will be available from April 29, 2010 at 5:00 PM EDT to May 6,
2010 at 11:59 PM EDT, dial 1-800-642-1687 domestically and 1-706-645-9291 internationally, and use
Access Code: 67744614.
A webcast of the conference call will also be available at
http://www.avalonbay.com/earnings, and an on-line playback of the webcast will be available
for at least 30 days following the call.
The Company produces Earnings Release Attachments (the Attachments) that provide detailed
information regarding operating, development, redevelopment, disposition and acquisition activity.
These Attachments are considered a part of this earnings release and are available in full with
this earnings release via the Companys website at http://www.avalonbay.com/earnings. To
receive future press releases via e-mail, please submit a request through
http://www.avalonbay.com/email.
About AvalonBay Communities, Inc.
As of March 31, 2010, the Company owned or held a direct or indirect ownership interest in 172
apartment communities containing 50,322 apartment homes in ten states and the District of Columbia,
of which seven communities were under construction and seven communities were under reconstruction.
The Company is an equity REIT in the business of developing, redeveloping, acquiring and managing
apartment communities in high barrier to entry markets of the United States. More information may
be found on the Companys website at http://www.avalonbay.com. For additional information, please
contact John Christie, Senior Director of Investor Relations and Research at 1-703-317-4747 or
Thomas J. Sargeant, Chief Financial Officer at 1-703-317-4635.
Forward-Looking Statements
This release, including its Attachments, contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of
Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended. You can identify these forward-looking statements by the Companys use of
words such as expects, plans, estimates, anticipates, projects, intends, believes,
outlook and similar expressions that do not relate to historical matters. Actual results may
differ materially from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements as a result of
risks and uncertainties, which include the following: we may abandon development or redevelopment
opportunities for which we have already incurred costs; adverse capital and credit market
conditions may affect our access to various sources of capital and/or cost of capital, which may
affect our business activities, earnings and common stock price, among other things; changes in
local employment conditions, demand for apartment homes, supply of competitive housing products,
and other economic conditions may result in lower than expected occupancy and/or rental rates and
adversely affect the profitability of our communities; increases in costs of materials, labor or
other expenses may result in communities that we develop or redevelop failing to achieve expected
profitability; delays in completing development, redevelopment and/or lease-up may result in
increased financing and construction costs and may delay and/or reduce the profitability of a
community; debt and/or equity
financing for development, redevelopment or acquisitions of communities may not be available or
may not be available on favorable terms; we may be unable to obtain, or experience delays in
obtaining, necessary governmental permits and authorizations; and increases in costs of materials,
labor or other expenses may result in communities that we develop or redevelop failing to achieve
expected profitability.
Copyright Ó 2010 AvalonBay Communities, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Additional discussions of risks and uncertainties appear in the Companys
filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the Companys Annual Report on Form
10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 under the headings Risk Factors and under the
heading Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations -
Forward-Looking Statements and in subsequent quarterly reports on Form 10-Q.
The Company does not undertake a duty to update forward-looking statements, including its expected
operating results for the second quarter of 2010. The Company may, in its discretion, provide
information in future public announcements regarding its outlook that may be of interest to the
investment community. The format and extent of future outlooks may be different from the format
and extent of the information contained in this release.
Definitions and Reconciliations
Non-GAAP financial measures and other capitalized terms, as used in this earnings release, are
defined and further explained on Attachment 13, Definitions and Reconciliations of Non-GAAP
Financial Measures and Other Terms. Attachment 13 is included in the full earnings release
available at the Companys website at
http://www.avalonbay.com/earnings.
Copyright Ó 2010 AvalonBay Communities, Inc. All Rights Reserved
FIRST QUARTER 2010
Supplemental Operating and Financial Data
Avalon at Mission Bay III, located in San Franciscos South of Market district, was completed
in the fourth quarter of 2009 for a Total Capital Cost of $147.4 million.
Avalon at Mission Bay III contains 260 apartment homes and is one of the first green apartment
buildings in San Francisco. The community was officially LEED certified in the fourth quarter of
2009 and is the first LEED certified building for AvalonBay.
FIRST QUARTER 2010
Supplemental Operating and Financial Data
Table of Contents
Company Profile |
||
Selected Operating and Other Information
|
Attachment 1 | |
Detailed Operating Information
|
Attachment 2 | |
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
Attachment 3 | |
Sequential Operating Information by Business Segment
|
Attachment 4 | |
Sub-Market Profile |
||
Quarterly Revenue and Occupancy Changes (Established Communities)
|
Attachment 5 | |
Sequential Quarterly Revenue and Occupancy Changes (Established Communities)
|
Attachment 6 | |
Operating Expenses (Opex) (Established Communities)
|
Attachment 7 | |
Development, Redevelopment, Acquisition and Disposition Profile |
||
Development Communities
|
Attachment 8 | |
Redevelopment Communities
|
Attachment 9 | |
Summary of Development and Redevelopment Community Activity
|
Attachment 10 | |
Future Development
|
Attachment 11 | |
Summary of Disposition Activity
|
Attachment 12 | |
Definitions and Reconciliations |
||
Definitions and Reconciliations of Non-GAAP Financial Measures and Other Terms
|
Attachment 13 |
The following is a Safe Harbor Statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act
of 1995 Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The projections and estimates contained in the following
attachments are forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties, and actual results
may differ materially from those projected in such statements. Risks associated with the Companys
development, redevelopment, construction, and lease-up activities, which could impact the
forward-looking statements made are discussed in the paragraph titled Forward-Looking Statements
in the release to which these attachments relate. In particular, development opportunities may be
abandoned; Total Capital Cost of a community may exceed original estimates, possibly making the
community uneconomical and/or affecting projected returns; construction and lease-up may not be
completed on schedule, resulting in increased debt service and construction costs; and other risks
described in the Companys filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the
Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 and the Companys
Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for subsequent quarters.
Attachment 1
AvalonBay Communities, Inc.
Selected Operating and Other Information
March 31, 2010
(Dollars in thousands except per share and per home data)
(unaudited)
Selected Operating and Other Information
March 31, 2010
(Dollars in thousands except per share and per home data)
(unaudited)
SELECTED OPERATING INFORMATION
Q1 | Q1 | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | $ Change | % Change | |||||||||||||
Net Income attributable to
common stockholders |
$ | 72,523 | $ | 47,425 | $ | 25,098 | 52.9% | |||||||||
Per common share basic |
$ | 0.89 | $ | 0.60 | $ | 0.29 | 48.3% | |||||||||
Per common share diluted |
$ | 0.88 | $ | 0.59 | $ | 0.29 | 49.2% | |||||||||
Funds from Operations |
$ | 79,257 | $ | 100,975 | $ | (21,718 | ) | (21.5% | ) | |||||||
Per common share diluted |
$ | 0.96 | $ | 1.27 | $ | (0.31 | ) | (24.4% | ) | |||||||
Dividends declared |
$ | 73,804 | $ | 71,292 | $ | 2,512 | 3.5% | |||||||||
Per common share |
$ | 0.8925 | $ | 0.8925 | $ | | 0.0% | |||||||||
Common shares outstanding |
82,693,377 | 79,879,306 | 2,814,071 | 3.5% | ||||||||||||
Outstanding operating partnership
units |
15,351 | 19,427 | (4,076 | ) | (21.0% | ) | ||||||||||
Total outstanding shares and units |
82,708,728 | 79,898,733 | 2,809,995 | 3.5% | ||||||||||||
Average shares outstanding basic |
81,897,566 | 79,005,998 | 2,891,568 | 3.7% | ||||||||||||
Weighted shares basic |
81,637,686 | 78,752,744 | 2,884,942 | 3.7% | ||||||||||||
Average operating partnership units
outstanding |
15,351 | 19,427 | (4,076 | ) | (21.0% | ) | ||||||||||
Effect of dilutive securities |
657,633 | 1,020,110 | (362,477 | ) | (35.5% | ) | ||||||||||
Average shares outstanding diluted |
82,310,670 | 79,792,281 | 2,518,389 | 3.2% | ||||||||||||
DEBT COMPOSITION AND MATURITIES
Average | ||||||||||||||||
Interest | Remaining | |||||||||||||||
Debt Composition (1) | Amount | Rate (2) | Maturities (1) | |||||||||||||
Conventional Debt |
2010 | $ | 122,552 | |||||||||||||
Long-term, fixed rate |
$ | 2,829,468 | 2011 | $ | 237,286 | |||||||||||
Long-term, variable rate |
354,806 | 2012 | $ | 503,259 | ||||||||||||
Variable rate facilities (3) |
| 2013 | $ | 379,573 | ||||||||||||
Subtotal, Conventional |
3,184,274 | 5.8% | 2014 | $ | 198,869 | |||||||||||
Tax-Exempt Debt |
||||||||||||||||
Long-term, fixed rate |
137,264 | |||||||||||||||
Long-term, variable rate |
629,318 | |||||||||||||||
Subtotal, Tax-Exempt |
766,582 | 2.7% | ||||||||||||||
Total Debt |
$ | 3,950,856 | 5.2% | |||||||||||||
CAPITALIZED COSTS
Non-Rev | ||||||||||||
Cap | Cap | Capex | ||||||||||
Interest | Overhead | per Home | ||||||||||
Q110 |
$ | 9,836 | $ | 5,491 | $ | 38 | ||||||
Q409 |
$ | 10,303 | $ | 6,135 | $ | 193 | ||||||
Q309 |
$ | 11,878 | $ | 5,680 | $ | 59 | ||||||
Q209 |
$ | 13,677 | $ | 6,610 | $ | 32 | ||||||
Q109 |
$ | 12,368 | $ | 6,507 | $ | 8 |
COMMUNITY INFORMATION
Apartment | ||||||||
Communities | Homes | |||||||
Current Communities |
165 | 47,813 | ||||||
Development Communities |
7 | 2,509 | ||||||
Development Rights |
29 | 7,361 |
(1) | Excludes debt associated with assets classified as held for sale. | |
(2) | Includes costs of financing such as credit enhancement fees, trustees fees, etc. | |
(3) | Represents the Companys $1 billion unsecured credit facility, of which no amount was drawn at March 31, 2010. |
Attachment 2
AvalonBay Communities, Inc.
Detailed Operating Information
March 31, 2010
(Dollars in thousands except per share data)
(unaudited)
Detailed Operating Information
March 31, 2010
(Dollars in thousands except per share data)
(unaudited)
Q1 | Q1 | |||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | % Change | ||||||||||
Revenue: |
||||||||||||
Rental and other income |
$ | 213,738 | $ | 208,265 | 2.6% | |||||||
Management, development and other fees |
1,849 | 1,468 | 26.0% | |||||||||
Total |
215,587 | 209,733 | 2.8% | |||||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||||||
Direct property operating expenses,
excluding property taxes |
54,433 | 50,728 | 7.3% | |||||||||
Property taxes |
23,172 | 20,886 | 10.9% | |||||||||
Property management and other indirect
operating expenses |
9,054 | 10,043 | (9.8% | ) | ||||||||
Total operating expenses |
86,659 | 81,657 | 6.1% | |||||||||
Interest expense, net |
(42,541 | ) | (30,130 | ) | 41.2% | |||||||
Gain on extinguishment of debt, net |
| 1,062 | n/a | |||||||||
General and administrative expense |
(8,895 | ) | (7,247 | ) | 22.7% | |||||||
Joint venture income |
227 | 3,457 | (93.4% | ) | ||||||||
Investments and investment management expense |
(1,039 | ) | (916 | ) | 13.4% | |||||||
Expensed development and other pursuit costs |
(505 | ) | (1,093 | ) | (53.8% | ) | ||||||
Depreciation expense |
(56,095 | ) | (50,073 | ) | 12.0% | |||||||
Income from continuing operations |
20,080 | 43,136 | (53.4% | ) | ||||||||
Income from discontinued operations (1) |
1,995 | 3,965 | (49.7% | ) | ||||||||
Gain on sale of communities |
50,291 | | n/a | |||||||||
Total discontinued operations |
52,286 | 3,965 | 1,218.7% | |||||||||
Net income |
72,366 | 47,101 | 53.6% | |||||||||
Net loss attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interests |
157 | 324 | (51.5% | ) | ||||||||
Net income attributable to common stockholders |
$ | 72,523 | $ | 47,425 | 52.9% | |||||||
Net income attributable to common stockholders per common share basic |
$ | 0.89 | $ | 0.60 | 48.3% | |||||||
Net income attributable to common stockholders per common share diluted |
$ | 0.88 | $ | 0.59 | 49.2% | |||||||
(1) | Reflects net income for investments in real estate classified as discontinued operations as of March 31, 2010 and investments in real estate sold during the period from January 1, 2009 through March 31, 2010. The following table details income from discontinued operations for the periods shown: |
Q1 | Q1 | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Rental income |
$ | 3,202 | $ | 9,946 | ||||
Operating and other expenses |
(1,207 | ) | (3,237 | ) | ||||
Interest expense, net |
| (177 | ) | |||||
Depreciation expense |
| (2,567 | ) | |||||
Income from discontinued operations |
$ | 1,995 | $ | 3,965 | ||||
Attachment 3
AvalonBay Communities, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Dollars in thousands)
(unaudited)
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Dollars in thousands)
(unaudited)
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Real estate |
$ | 7,529,460 | $ | 7,425,310 | ||||
Less accumulated depreciation |
(1,533,579 | ) | (1,477,772 | ) | ||||
Net operating real estate |
5,995,881 | 5,947,538 | ||||||
Construction in progress, including land |
580,814 | 531,299 | ||||||
Land held for development |
206,713 | 237,095 | ||||||
Operating real estate assets held for sale, net |
86,610 | 117,555 | ||||||
Total real estate, net |
6,870,018 | 6,833,487 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
123,297 | 105,691 | ||||||
Cash in escrow |
207,336 | 210,676 | ||||||
Resident security deposits |
22,456 | 23,646 | ||||||
Other assets |
285,027 | 284,105 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 7,508,134 | $ | 7,457,605 | ||||
Unsecured notes, net |
$ | 1,659,529 | $ | 1,658,029 | ||||
Unsecured facilities |
| | ||||||
Notes payable |
2,290,378 | 2,316,843 | ||||||
Resident security deposits |
33,532 | 33,646 | ||||||
Liabilities related to assets held for sale |
1,679 | 2,669 | ||||||
Other liabilities |
380,643 | 390,494 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
$ | 4,365,761 | $ | 4,401,681 | ||||
Redeemable noncontrolling interests |
6,724 | 5,797 | ||||||
Stockholders equity |
3,135,649 | 3,050,127 | ||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
$ | 7,508,134 | $ | 7,457,605 | ||||
Attachment 4
AvalonBay Communities, Inc.
Sequential Operating Information by Business Segment (1)
March 31, 2010
(Dollars in thousands)
(unaudited)
Sequential Operating Information by Business Segment (1)
March 31, 2010
(Dollars in thousands)
(unaudited)
Total | Quarter Ended | Quarter Ended | ||||||||||
Homes (2) | March 31, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | ||||||||||
RENTAL REVENUE |
||||||||||||
Established (3) |
30,672 | $ | 159,640 | $ | 160,055 | |||||||
Other Stabilized (4) |
5,446 | 28,901 | 27,745 | |||||||||
Redevelopment (5) |
5,067 | 23,030 | 22,975 | |||||||||
Development (6) |
2,788 | 1,988 | 1,160 | |||||||||
Total Consolidated Communities |
43,973 | $ | 213,559 | $ | 211,935 | |||||||
OPERATING EXPENSE |
||||||||||||
Established |
$ | 56,802 | $ | 56,700 | ||||||||
Other Stabilized |
12,075 | 11,444 | ||||||||||
Redevelopment |
7,315 | 7,812 | ||||||||||
Development |
1,422 | 1,304 | ||||||||||
Total Consolidated Communities |
$ | 77,614 | $ | 77,260 | ||||||||
NOI (7) |
||||||||||||
Established |
$ | 102,987 | $ | 103,606 | ||||||||
Other Stabilized |
16,869 | 16,855 | ||||||||||
Redevelopment |
15,737 | 15,202 | ||||||||||
Development |
567 | (141 | ) | |||||||||
Total Consolidated Communities |
$ | 136,160 | $ | 135,522 | ||||||||
AVERAGE REVENUE PER OCCUPIED HOME |
||||||||||||
Established |
$ | 1,804 | $ | 1,813 | ||||||||
Other Stabilized |
1,810 | 1,812 | ||||||||||
Redevelopment |
1,603 | 1,622 | ||||||||||
Development (8) |
2,266 | 1,744 | ||||||||||
ECONOMIC OCCUPANCY |
||||||||||||
Established |
96.2 | % | 96.0 | % | ||||||||
Other Stabilized |
94.3 | % | 90.1 | % | ||||||||
Redevelopment |
94.5 | % | 93.2 | % | ||||||||
Development |
31.3 | % | 56.2 | % |
(1) | Excludes amounts related to communities that have been sold, or that are classified as held for sale. | |
(2) | Home count by segment is determined by the timing and level of stabilization and the Companys intention for the asset during 2010. | |
(3) | Established Communities are consolidated communities that have Stabilized Operations as of January 1, 2009 and are not conducting or planning to conduct substantial redevelopment activities within the current year. Established Communities do not include communities currently held for sale or planned for disposition during the current year. | |
(4) | Other Stabilized Communities are all other completed consolidated communities that the Company owns, and that have stabilized occupancy as of January 1, 2010. Other Stabilized Communities do not include unconsolidated communities or communities that are planning to conduct substantial redevelopment activities or that are planned for disposition within the current year. Results for these communities for quarters prior to March 31, 2010 may reflect community operations prior to stabilization, including periods of lease-up, such that occupancy levels are below what would be considered stabilized. | |
(5) | Redevelopment communities presented for all periods in this attachment are communities where substantial redevelopment is in progress or planned for the current year. Redevelopment communities in this attachment do not represent the total composition of communities that were under reconstruction for any period prior to the current year. | |
(6) | Development communities presented for all periods in this attachment are communities under construction in the current year, that may be fully or partially operating. Development communities included in this attachment do not represent the total composition of communities that were under construction for any period prior to the current year. | |
(7) | NOI includes other revenue amounts that are not included in rental revenue. | |
(8) | Average revenue per occupied home for development communities includes only those assets with at least one full quarter of lease-up activity. |
Attachment 5
AvalonBay Communities, Inc.
Quarterly Revenue and Occupancy Changes Established Communities (1)
Quarterly Revenue and Occupancy Changes Established Communities (1)
March 31, 2010
Apartment | Average Rental Rates (2) | Economic Occupancy | Rental Revenue ($000s) (3) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Homes | Q1 10 | Q1 09 | % Change | Q1 10 | Q1 09 | % Change | Q1 10 | Q1 09 | % Change | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
New England |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Boston, MA |
4,092 | $ | 1,904 | $ | 1,933 | (1.5 | %) | 95.6 | % | 95.0 | % | 0.6 | % | $ | 22,360 | $ | 22,564 | (0.9 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Fairfield-New Haven, CT |
2,350 | 1,888 | 2,005 | (5.8 | %) | 96.3 | % | 93.9 | % | 2.4 | % | 12,822 | 13,280 | (3.4 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
New England Average |
6,442 | 1,899 | 1,960 | (3.1 | %) | 95.9 | % | 94.6 | % | 1.3 | % | 35,182 | 35,844 | (1.8 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Metro NY/NJ |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
New York, NY |
2,714 | 2,562 | 2,670 | (4.0 | %) | 96.3 | % | 95.5 | % | 0.8 | % | 20,093 | 20,765 | (3.2 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
New Jersey |
2,462 | 1,849 | 1,930 | (4.2 | %) | 96.4 | % | 95.7 | % | 0.7 | % | 13,171 | 13,647 | (3.5 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Long Island, NY |
1,732 | 2,199 | 2,299 | (4.3 | %) | 96.4 | % | 93.4 | % | 3.0 | % | 11,020 | 11,165 | (1.3 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Metro NY/NJ Average |
6,908 | 2,217 | 2,314 | (4.2 | %) | 96.4 | % | 95.0 | % | 1.4 | % | 44,284 | 45,577 | (2.8 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mid-Atlantic/Midwest |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Washington Metro |
5,343 | 1,746 | 1,757 | (0.6 | %) | 96.1 | % | 96.5 | % | (0.4 | %) | 26,899 | 27,163 | (1.0 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Chicago, IL |
601 | 1,425 | 1,484 | (4.0 | %) | 96.7 | % | 95.1 | % | 1.6 | % | 2,485 | 2,546 | (2.4 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mid-Atlantic/Midwest Average |
5,944 | 1,713 | 1,729 | (0.9 | %) | 96.2 | % | 96.4 | % | (0.2 | %) | 29,384 | 29,709 | (1.1 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pacific Northwest |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Seattle, WA |
1,943 | 1,187 | 1,339 | (11.4 | %) | 95.5 | % | 94.5 | % | 1.0 | % | 6,613 | 7,377 | (10.4 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pacific Northwest Average |
1,943 | 1,187 | 1,339 | (11.4 | %) | 95.5 | % | 94.5 | % | 1.0 | % | 6,613 | 7,377 | (10.4 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Northern California |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
San Jose, CA |
2,982 | 1,725 | 1,927 | (10.5 | %) | 96.7 | % | 96.2 | % | 0.5 | % | 14,918 | 16,570 | (10.0 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Oakland-East Bay, CA |
1,569 | 1,378 | 1,506 | (8.5 | %) | 95.4 | % | 94.6 | % | 0.8 | % | 6,183 | 6,699 | (7.7 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
San Francisco, CA |
1,424 | 2,006 | 2,197 | (8.7 | %) | 96.9 | % | 96.6 | % | 0.3 | % | 8,306 | 9,068 | (8.4 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Northern California Average |
5,975 | 1,701 | 1,881 | (9.6 | %) | 96.5 | % | 96.0 | % | 0.5 | % | 29,407 | 32,337 | (9.1 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Southern California |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Los Angeles, CA |
1,780 | 1,572 | 1,738 | (9.6 | %) | 96.3 | % | 92.8 | % | 3.5 | % | 8,082 | 8,606 | (6.1 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Orange County, CA |
916 | 1,357 | 1,457 | (6.9 | %) | 95.2 | % | 95.6 | % | (0.4 | %) | 3,548 | 3,827 | (7.3 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
San Diego, CA |
764 | 1,437 | 1,516 | (5.2 | %) | 95.3 | % | 94.6 | % | 0.7 | % | 3,140 | 3,289 | (4.5 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Southern California Average |
3,460 | 1,485 | 1,616 | (8.1 | %) | 95.8 | % | 93.8 | % | 2.0 | % | 14,770 | 15,722 | (6.1 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average/Total Established |
30,672 | $ | 1,804 | $ | 1,902 | (5.2 | %) | 96.2 | % | 95.2 | % | 1.0 | % | $ | 159,640 | $ | 166,566 | (4.2 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||
(1) | Established Communities are communities with stabilized operating expenses as of January 1, 2009 such that a comparison of 2009 to 2010 is meaningful. | |
(2) | Reflects the effect of concessions amortized over the average lease term. | |
(3) | With concessions reflected on a cash basis, rental revenue from Established Communities decreased 4.0% between years. |
Attachment 6
AvalonBay Communities, Inc.
*Sequential Quarterly* Revenue and Occupancy Changes Established Communities (1)
*Sequential Quarterly* Revenue and Occupancy Changes Established Communities (1)
March 31, 2010
Apartment | Average Rental Rates (2) | Economic Occupancy | Rental Revenue ($000s) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Homes | Q1 10 | Q4 09 | % Change | Q1 10 | Q4 09 | % Change | Q1 10 | Q4 09 | % Change | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
New England |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Boston, MA |
4,092 | $ | 1,904 | $ | 1,893 | 0.6 | % | 95.6 | % | 95.2 | % | 0.4 | % | $ | 22,360 | $ | 22,136 | 1.0 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Fairfield-New Haven, CT |
2,350 | 1,888 | 1,899 | (0.6 | %) | 96.3 | % | 96.6 | % | (0.3 | %) | 12,822 | 12,930 | (0.8 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
New England Average |
6,442 | 1,899 | 1,897 | 0.1 | % | 95.9 | % | 95.7 | % | 0.2 | % | 35,182 | 35,066 | 0.3 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Metro NY/NJ |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
New York, NY |
2,714 | 2,562 | 2,578 | (0.6 | %) | 96.3 | % | 96.7 | % | (0.4 | %) | 20,093 | 20,303 | (1.0 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
New Jersey |
2,462 | 1,849 | 1,838 | 0.6 | % | 96.4 | % | 96.2 | % | 0.2 | % | 13,171 | 13,068 | 0.8 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Long Island, NY |
1,732 | 2,199 | 2,184 | 0.7 | % | 96.4 | % | 95.8 | % | 0.6 | % | 11,020 | 10,883 | 1.3 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Metro NY/NJ Average |
6,908 | 2,217 | 2,217 | 0.0 | % | 96.4 | % | 96.3 | % | 0.1 | % | 44,284 | 44,254 | 0.1 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mid-Atlantic/Midwest |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Washington Metro |
5,343 | 1,746 | 1,744 | 0.1 | % | 96.1 | % | 97.0 | % | (0.9 | %) | 26,899 | 27,118 | (0.8 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Chicago, IL |
601 | 1,425 | 1,422 | 0.2 | % | 96.7 | % | 95.4 | % | 1.3 | % | 2,485 | 2,447 | 1.6 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mid-Atlantic/Midwest Average |
5,944 | 1,713 | 1,712 | 0.1 | % | 96.2 | % | 96.9 | % | (0.7 | %) | 29,384 | 29,565 | (0.6 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pacific Northwest
Seattle, WA |
1,943 | 1,187 | 1,214 | (2.2 | %) | 95.5 | % | 93.9 | % | 1.6 | % | 6,613 | 6,644 | (0.5 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pacific Northwest Average |
1,943 | 1,187 | 1,214 | (2.2 | %) | 95.5 | % | 93.9 | % | 1.6 | % | 6,613 | 6,644 | (0.5 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Northern California |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
San Jose, CA |
2,982 | 1,725 | 1,747 | (1.3 | %) | 96.7 | % | 96.1 | % | 0.6 | % | 14,918 | 15,017 | (0.7 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Oakland-East Bay, CA |
1,569 | 1,378 | 1,390 | (0.9 | %) | 95.4 | % | 95.6 | % | (0.2 | %) | 6,183 | 6,250 | (1.1 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
San Francisco, CA |
1,424 | 2,006 | 2,031 | (1.2 | %) | 96.9 | % | 96.0 | % | 0.9 | % | 8,306 | 8,328 | (0.3 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Northern California Average |
5,975 | 1,701 | 1,720 | (1.1 | %) | 96.5 | % | 96.0 | % | 0.5 | % | 29,407 | 29,595 | (0.6 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Southern California |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Los Angeles, CA |
1,780 | 1,572 | 1,599 | (1.7 | %) | 96.3 | % | 95.5 | % | 0.8 | % | 8,082 | 8,159 | (0.9 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Orange County, CA |
916 | 1,357 | 1,386 | (2.1 | %) | 95.2 | % | 95.9 | % | (0.7 | %) | 3,548 | 3,651 | (2.8 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
San Diego, CA |
764 | 1,437 | 1,453 | (1.1 | %) | 95.3 | % | 93.6 | % | 1.7 | % | 3,140 | 3,121 | 0.6 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Southern California Average |
3,460 | 1,485 | 1,510 | (1.7 | %) | 95.8 | % | 95.2 | % | 0.6 | % | 14,770 | 14,931 | (1.1 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average/Total Established |
30,672 | $ | 1,804 | $ | 1,813 | (0.5 | %) | 96.2 | % | 96.0 | % | 0.2 | % | $ | 159,640 | $ | 160,055 | (0.3 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||
(1) | Established Communities are communities with stabilized operating expenses as of January 1, 2009 such that a comparison of 2009 to 2010 is meaningful. | |
(2) | Reflects the effect of concessions amortized over the average lease term. |
Attachment 7
AvalonBay Communities, Inc.
Operating Expenses (Opex) Established Communities (1)
Operating Expenses (Opex) Established Communities (1)
March 31, 2010
(Dollars in thousands)
(unaudited)
(unaudited)
Q1 10 | ||||||||||||||||
% of | ||||||||||||||||
Q1 10 | Q1 09 | % Change | Total Opex | |||||||||||||
Payroll (2) |
$ | 11,753 | $ | 11,588 | 1.4 | % | 20.7 | % | ||||||||
Utilities (3) |
7,158 | 7,319 | (2.2 | %) | 12.6 | % | ||||||||||
Repairs & maintenance (4) |
8,696 | 7,683 | 13.2 | % | 15.3 | % | ||||||||||
Marketing |
1,617 | 1,578 | 2.5 | % | 2.8 | % | ||||||||||
Land lease expense (5) |
3,423 | 3,433 | (0.3 | %) | 6.0 | % | ||||||||||
Office operations (6) |
5,426 | 4,907 | 10.6 | % | 9.6 | % | ||||||||||
Insurance (7) |
1,341 | 1,758 | (23.7 | %) | 2.4 | % | ||||||||||
Property taxes |
17,388 | 16,987 | 2.4 | % | 30.6 | % | ||||||||||
Total Established Communities Operating Expenses (8) |
$ | 56,802 | $ | 55,253 | 2.8 | % | 100.0 | % | ||||||||
(1) | Established Communities includes 30,672 apartment homes and consists of communities with stabilized operating expenses as of January 1, 2009 such that a comparison of 2009 to 2010 is meaningful. | |
(2) | Payroll reflects expenses directly related to on-site operations. | |
(3) | Utilities represents aggregate utility costs, net of resident reimbursements. | |
(4) | Repairs & maintenance includes costs associated with preparing an apartment home for new residents including carpet and appliance replacement, as well as redecorating, landscaping, snow removal and regular maintenance costs. | |
(5) | Land lease expense represents GAAP-based rental expense. Cash paid for Established Community land leases during the quarter ended March 31, 2010 was $844. | |
(6) | Office operations includes administrative costs, bad debt expense and association and license fees. | |
(7) | The Company renegotiated its property insurance policies in the fourth quarter of 2009, lowering premiums through April 2011. | |
(8) | Direct operating costs for Established Communities excludes indirect costs for off-site corporate level property management related expenses, and other support related expenses. |
Attachment 8
AvalonBay Communities, Inc.
Development Communities as of March 31, 2010
Development Communities as of March 31, 2010
Percentage | Total | Avg | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ownership | # of | Capital | Schedule | Rent | % Occ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Upon | Apt | Cost (1) | Initial | Stabilized | Per | % Comp | % Leased | Physical | Economic | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Completion | Homes | (millions) | Start | Occupancy | Complete | Ops (1) | Home (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (1) (5) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Inclusive of | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Concessions | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
See Attachment #13 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Under Construction: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1. Avalon Fort Greene |
100 | % | 631 | $ | 305.8 | Q4 2007 | Q4 2009 | Q1 2011 | Q3 2011 | $ | 2,780 | 41.8 | % | 46.0 | % | 35.8 | % | 24.5 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
New York, NY |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2. Avalon Walnut Creek (6) |
100 | % | 422 | 151.7 | Q3 2008 | Q2 2010 | Q1 2011 | Q3 2011 | 2,215 | N/A | 13.3 | % | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Walnut Creek, CA |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3. Avalon Norwalk |
100 | % | 311 | 85.4 | Q3 2008 | Q2 2010 | Q2 2011 | Q4 2011 | 2,260 | 7.7 | % | 20.6 | % | 4.5 | % | N/A | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Norwalk, CT |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4. Avalon Towers Bellevue |
100 | % | 397 | 126.1 | Q4 2008 | Q2 2010 | Q2 2011 | Q4 2011 | 2,390 | 12.1 | % | 5.8 | % | 1.3 | % | N/A | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bellevue, WA |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5. Avalon Northborough II |
100 | % | 219 | 35.7 | Q4 2009 | Q1 2010 | Q1 2011 | Q3 2011 | 1,650 | 22.4 | % | 31.5 | % | 12.8 | % | 3.5 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Northborough, MA |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6. Avalon at West Long Branch |
100 | % | 180 | 28.1 | Q4 2009 | Q3 2010 | Q1 2011 | Q3 2011 | 1,815 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
West Long Branch, NJ |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7. Avalon Rockville Centre |
100 | % | 349 | 110.7 | Q1 2010 | Q3 2011 | Q3 2012 | Q1 2013 | 2,615 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rockville Centre, NY |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subtotal/Weighted Average |
2,509 | $ | 843.5 | $ | 2,370 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Completed this Quarter: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1. Avalon Irvine |
100 | % | 279 | $ | 77.4 | Q4 2007 | Q2 2009 | Q1 2010 | Q3 2010 | $ | 1,725 | 100.0 | % | 94.3 | % | 90.0 | % | 80.8 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Irvine, CA |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subtotal/Weighted Average |
279 | $ | 77.4 | $ | 1,725 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total/Weighted Average |
2,788 | $ | 920.9 | $ | 2,305 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted Average Projected NOI
as a % of Total Capital Cost (1) (7) |
6.0 | % | Inclusive of | Concessions - See | Attachment #13 |
Non-Stabilized Development Communities:(8) | % Economic | Asset Cost Basis (millions), Non-Stabilized Development: | Source | |||||||||||||||||||
Occ | ||||||||||||||||||||||
(1) (5) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Prior Completions: |
Capital Cost, Prior Quarter Completions | $ | 465.2 | Att. 8 | ||||||||||||||||||
Avalon White Plains |
407 | $ | 153.0 | Capital Cost, Current Completions | 77.4 | Att. 8 | ||||||||||||||||
Avalon Union City |
439 | 118.7 | Capital Cost, Under Construction | 843.5 | Att. 8 | |||||||||||||||||
Avalon at Mission Bay III |
260 | 147.4 | Less: Remaining to Invest, Under Construction | (228.6 | ) | Att. 10 | ||||||||||||||||
Avalon Blue Hills |
276 | 46.1 | Total Asset Cost Basis, Non-Stabilized Development | $ | 1,157.5 | |||||||||||||||||
1,382 | $ | 465.2 | 94.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Q1 2010 Net Operating Income/(Deficit) for communities under construction and non-stabilized development communities was $5.1 million. See Attachment #13. |
(1) | See Attachment #13 Definitions and Reconciliations of Non-GAAP Financial Measures and Other Terms. | |
(2) | Includes apartment homes for which construction has been completed and accepted by management as of April 23, 2010. | |
(3) | Includes apartment homes for which leases have been executed or non-refundable deposits have been paid as of April 23, 2010. | |
(4) | Physical occupancy based on apartment homes occupied as of April 23, 2010. | |
(5) | Represents Economic Occupancy for the first quarter of 2010. | |
(6) | This community is being financed in part by a combination of third-party tax-exempt and taxable debt. | |
(7) | The Weighted Average calculation is based on the Companys pro rata share of the Total Capital Cost for each community. | |
(8) | Represents Development Communities completed in prior quarters that had not achieved Stabilized Operations for the entire current quarter. Estimates are based on the Companys pro rata share of the Total Capital Cost for each community. | |
This chart contains forward-looking statements. Please see the paragraph regarding forward-looking statements on the Table of Contents page relating to the Companys Supplemental Operating and Financial Data for the first quarter of 2010. |
Attachment 9
AvalonBay Communities, Inc.
Redevelopment Communities as of March 31, 2010
Redevelopment Communities as of March 31, 2010
Cost (millions) | Schedule | Avg | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
# of | Pre- | Total | Rent | Homes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Percentage | Apt | Redevelopment | Capital | Acquisition / | Restabilized | Per | Completed | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ownership | Homes | Capital Cost | Cost (1)(2) | Completion | Start | Complete | Ops (2) | Home (2) | @ 3/31/2010 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Inclusive of | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Concessions | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
See Attachment #13 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Under Redevelopment: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1. Avalon Woodland Hills |
100 | % | 663 | $ | 72.1 | $ | 110.6 | Q4 1997 | Q4 2007 | Q2 2010 | Q4 2010 | $ | 1,600 | 663 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Woodland Hills, CA |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2. Avalon at Diamond Heights |
100 | % | 154 | 25.3 | 30.6 | Q2 1994 | Q4 2007 | Q4 2010 | Q2 2011 | 2,165 | 78 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
San Francisco, CA |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3. Avalon Burbank |
100 | % | 400 | 71.0 | 94.4 | Q2 2002 | Q3 2008 | Q3 2010 | Q1 2011 | 2,005 | 355 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Burbank, CA |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4. Avalon Pleasanton |
100 | % | 456 | 63.0 | 80.9 | Q1 1994 | Q2 2009 | Q4 2011 | Q2 2012 | 1,350 | 25 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pleasanton, CA |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5. Avalon Princeton Junction (3) |
100 | % | 512 | 30.2 | 49.9 | Q4 1988 | Q2 2009 | Q1 2012 | Q3 2012 | 1,455 | 54 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
West Windsor, NJ |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6. Avalon at Cedar Ridge |
100 | % | 195 | 27.7 | 33.8 | Q2 1997 | Q3 2009 | Q1 2011 | Q3 2011 | 1,485 | 78 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Daly City, CA |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7. Avalon at Willow Creek |
100 | % | 235 | 36.5 | 44.0 | Q1 1994 | Q4 2009 | Q1 2011 | Q3 2011 | 1,480 | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fremont, CA |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total/Weighted Average |
2,615 | $ | 325.8 | $ | 444.2 | $ | 1,605 | 1,253 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(1) | Inclusive of acquisition cost. | |
(2) | See Attachment #13 Definitions and Reconciliations of Non-GAAP Financial Measures and Other Terms. | |
(3) | This community was formerly known as Avalon Watch. | |
This chart contains forward-looking statements. Please see the paragraph regarding forward-looking statements on the Table of Contents page relating to the Companys Supplemental Operating and Financial Data for the first quarter of 2010. |
Attachment 10
AvalonBay Communities, Inc.
Summary of Development and Redevelopment Community Activity (1) as of March 31, 2010
(Dollars in Thousands)
Summary of Development and Redevelopment Community Activity (1) as of March 31, 2010
(Dollars in Thousands)
DEVELOPMENT (2)
Apt Homes | Total Capital | Cost of Homes | Construction in | |||||||||||||||||
Completed & | Cost Invested | Completed & | Remaining to | Progress at | ||||||||||||||||
Occupied | During Period (3) | Occupied (4) | Invest (5)(6) | Period End | ||||||||||||||||
Total - 2008 Actual |
2,907 | $ | 724,962 | $ | 758,238 | $ | 666,623 | $ | 820,218 | |||||||||||
2009 Actual: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Quarter 1 |
422 | $ | 124,422 | $ | 143,195 | $ | 526,116 | $ | 776,473 | |||||||||||
Quarter 2 |
719 | 128,785 | 222,384 | 395,611 | 745,907 | |||||||||||||||
Quarter 3 |
797 | 96,859 | 262,127 | 287,956 | 576,563 | |||||||||||||||
Quarter 4 |
555 | 101,306 | 181,678 | 245,046 | 500,671 | |||||||||||||||
Total - 2009 Actual |
2,493 | $ | 451,372 | $ | 809,384 | |||||||||||||||
2010 Projected: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Quarter 1 (Actual) |
279 | $ | 122,151 | $ | 101,286 | $ | 228,620 | $ | 552,899 | |||||||||||
Quarter 2 (Projected) |
502 | 78,056 | 169,386 | 150,564 | 469,848 | |||||||||||||||
Quarter 3 (Projected) |
533 | 50,159 | 173,516 | 100,405 | 356,590 | |||||||||||||||
Quarter 4 (Projected) |
459 | 39,107 | 146,867 | 61,298 | 179,704 | |||||||||||||||
Total - 2010 Projected |
1,773 | $ | 289,473 | $ | 591,055 | |||||||||||||||
REDEVELOPMENT
Total Capital | Reconstruction in | |||||||||||
Cost Invested | Remaining to | Progress at | ||||||||||
During Period (3) | Invest (5) | Period End | ||||||||||
Total - 2008 Actual |
$ | 45,918 | $ | 53,214 | $ | 47,362 | ||||||
2009 Actual: |
||||||||||||
Quarter 1 |
$ | 12,031 | $ | 40,056 | $ | 40,477 | ||||||
Quarter 2 |
15,983 | 61,157 | 38,027 | |||||||||
Quarter 3 |
12,868 | 54,489 | 31,389 | |||||||||
Quarter 4 |
10,029 | 49,527 | 30,628 | |||||||||
Total - 2009 Actual |
$ | 50,911 | ||||||||||
2010 Projected: |
||||||||||||
Quarter 1 (Actual) |
$ | 12,654 | $ | 36,873 | $ | 27,915 | ||||||
Quarter 2 (Projected) |
12,201 | 24,672 | 27,172 | |||||||||
Quarter 3 (Projected) |
7,968 | 16,704 | 23,505 | |||||||||
Quarter 4 (Projected) |
4,708 | 11,996 | 13,615 | |||||||||
Total - 2010 Projected |
$ | 37,531 | ||||||||||
(1) | Data is presented for all communities currently under development or redevelopment. | |
(2) | Projected periods include data for consolidated joint ventures at 100%. The offset for joint venture partners participation is reflected as redeemable noncontrolling interest. | |
(3) | Represents Total Capital Cost incurred or expected to be incurred during the quarter, year or in total. See Attachment #13 Definitions and Reconciliations of Non-GAAP Financial Measures and Other Terms. | |
(4) | Represents projected Total Capital Cost of apartment homes completed and occupied during the quarter. Calculated by dividing Total Capital Cost for each Development Community by number of homes for the community, multiplied by the number of homes completed and occupied during the quarter. | |
(5) | Represents projected Total Capital Cost remaining to invest on communities currently under construction or reconstruction. | |
(6) | Amount for Q1 2010 includes $59.4 million expected to be financed by proceeds from third-party tax-exempt and taxable debt. | |
This chart contains forward-looking statements. Please see the paragraph regarding forward-looking statements on the Table of Contents page relating to the Companys Supplemental Operating and Financial Data for the first quarter of 2010. |
Attachment 11
AvalonBay Communities, Inc.
Future Development as of March 31, 2010
Future Development as of March 31, 2010
DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (1)
Estimated | Total | |||||||
Number | Capital Cost (1) | |||||||
Location of Development Right | of Homes | (millions) | ||||||
1. Seattle, WA |
204 | $ | 58 | |||||
2. Wilton, CT |
100 | 30 | ||||||
3. Plymouth, MA Phase II |
91 | 20 | ||||||
4. Greenburgh, NY Phase II |
288 | 77 | ||||||
5. Lynnwood, WA Phase II |
82 | 18 | ||||||
6. San Francisco, CA |
173 | 65 | ||||||
7. Wood-Ridge, NJ Phase I |
266 | 60 | ||||||
8. Tysons Corner, VA I |
354 | 80 | ||||||
9. Garden City, NY |
160 | 51 | ||||||
10. New York, NY Phase I |
396 | 169 | ||||||
11. Boston, MA |
180 | 97 | ||||||
12. Cohasset, MA |
200 | 38 | ||||||
13. Shelton, CT |
251 | 66 | ||||||
14. Andover, MA |
115 | 26 | ||||||
15. North Bergen, NJ |
164 | 47 | ||||||
16. Brooklyn, NY |
861 | 443 | ||||||
17. Wood-Ridge, NJ Phase II |
140 | 32 | ||||||
18. Rockville, MD |
240 | 57 | ||||||
19. Dublin, CA Phase II |
487 | 145 | ||||||
20. Hackensack, NJ |
226 | 48 | ||||||
21. Seattle, WA II |
272 | 81 | ||||||
22. Huntington Station, NY |
424 | 100 | ||||||
23. Roselle Park, NJ |
249 | 54 | ||||||
24. Ossining, NY |
210 | 44 | ||||||
25. Tysons Corner, VA II |
338 | 87 | ||||||
26. Greenburgh, NY Phase III |
156 | 43 | ||||||
27. Ocean Township, NJ |
309 | 57 | ||||||
28. New York, NY Phase II |
295 | 142 | ||||||
29. Stratford, CT |
130 | 22 | ||||||
Total |
7,361 | $ | 2,257 | |||||
(1) | See Attachment #13 Definitions and Reconciliations of Non-GAAP Financial Measures and Other Terms. | |
This chart contains forward-looking statements. Please see the paragraph regarding forward-looking statements on the Table of Contents page relating to the Companys Supplemental Operating and Financial Data for the first quarter of 2010. |
Attachment 12
AvalonBay Communities, Inc.
Summary of Disposition Activity (1) as of March 31, 2010
(Dollars in thousands)
Summary of Disposition Activity (1) as of March 31, 2010
(Dollars in thousands)
Accumulated | Weighted Average | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of | Gross Sales | Depreciation | Economic | Initial Year | Weighted Average | |||||||||||||||||||
Communities Sold (2) | Price | GAAP Gain | and Other | Gain (4) | Mkt. Cap Rate (3) (4) | Unleveraged IRR (3) (4) | ||||||||||||||||||
1998: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
9 Communities |
$ | 170,312 | $ | 25,270 | $ | 23,438 | $ | 1,832 | 8.1 | % | 16.2 | % | ||||||||||||
1999: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
16 Communities |
$ | 317,712 | $ | 47,093 | $ | 27,150 | $ | 19,943 | 8.3 | % | 12.1 | % | ||||||||||||
2000: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
8 Communities |
$ | 160,085 | $ | 40,779 | $ | 6,262 | $ | 34,517 | 7.9 | % | 15.3 | % | ||||||||||||
2001: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
7 Communities |
$ | 241,130 | $ | 62,852 | $ | 21,623 | $ | 41,229 | 8.0 | % | 14.3 | % | ||||||||||||
2002: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Community |
$ | 80,100 | $ | 48,893 | $ | 7,462 | $ | 41,431 | 5.4 | % | 20.1 | % | ||||||||||||
2003: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
12 Communities, 1 Land Parcel (5) |
$ | 460,600 | $ | 184,438 | $ | 52,613 | $ | 131,825 | 6.3 | % | 15.3 | % | ||||||||||||
2004: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
5 Communities, 1 Land Parcel |
$ | 250,977 | $ | 122,425 | $ | 19,320 | $ | 103,105 | 4.8 | % | 16.8 | % | ||||||||||||
2005: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
7 Communities, 1 Office Building, |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
3 Land Parcels (6) |
$ | 382,720 | $ | 199,767 | $ | 14,929 | $ | 184,838 | 3.8 | % | 18.0 | % | ||||||||||||
2006: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
4 Communities, 3 Land Parcels (7) |
$ | 281,485 | $ | 117,539 | $ | 21,699 | $ | 95,840 | 4.6 | % | 15.2 | % | ||||||||||||
2007: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
5 Communities, 1 Land Parcel (8) |
$ | 273,896 | $ | 163,352 | $ | 17,588 | $ | 145,764 | 4.6 | % | 17.8 | % | ||||||||||||
2008: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
11 Communities (9) |
$ | 646,200 | $ | 288,384 | $ | 56,469 | $ | 231,915 | 5.1 | % | 14.1 | % | ||||||||||||
2009: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
5 Communities, 2 Land Parcels (10) |
$ | 193,186 | $ | 68,717 | $ | 16,692 | $ | 52,025 | 6.5 | % | 13.0 | % | ||||||||||||
2010: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
2 Communities |
$ | 82,950 | $ | 50,291 | $ | 17,140 | $ | 33,151 | 6.6 | % | 9.8 | % | ||||||||||||
1998 - 2010 Total |
$ | 3,541,353 | $ | 1,419,800 | $ | 302,385 | $ | 1,117,415 | 5.9 | % | 15.0 | % | ||||||||||||
(1) | Activity excludes dispositions to joint venture entities in which the Company retains an economic interest. | |
(2) | For dispositions from January 1, 1998 through March 31, 2010 the Weighted Average Holding Period is 7.8 years. | |
(3) | For purposes of this attachment, land sales and the disposition of an office building are not included in the calculation of Weighted Average Holding Period, Weighted Average Initial Year Market Cap Rate, or Weighted Average Unleveraged IRR. | |
(4) | See Attachment #13 Definitions and Reconciliations of Non-GAAP Financial Measures and Other Terms. | |
(5) | 2003 GAAP gain, for purposes of this attachment, includes $23,448 related to the sale of a community in which the Company held a 50% membership interest. | |
(6) | 2005 GAAP gain includes the recovery of an impairment loss of $3,000 recorded in 2002 related to one of the land parcels sold in 2005. This loss was recorded to reflect the land at fair value based on its entitlement status at the time it was determined to be planned for disposition. | |
(7) | 2006 GAAP gain, for purposes of this attachment, includes $6,609 related to the sale of a community in which the Company held a 25% equity interest. | |
(8) | 2007 GAAP gain, for purposes of this attachment, includes $56,320 related to the sale of a partnership interest in which the Company held a 50% equity interest. | |
(9) | 2008 GAAP gain, for purposes of this attachment, includes $3,483 related to the sale of a community held by the Fund in which the Company holds a 15.2% equity interest. | |
(10) | 2009 GAAP and Economic Gain include the recognition of approximately $2,770 in deferred gains for six prior year dispositions, recognition of which occurred in conjunction with the November 2009 settlement of previously disclosed litigation with The Equal Rights Center, involving accessibility of our communities. |
Attachment 13
AvalonBay Communities, Inc.
Definitions and Reconciliations of Non-GAAP Financial Measures and Other Terms
Definitions and Reconciliations of Non-GAAP Financial Measures and Other Terms
This release, including its attachments, contains certain non-GAAP financial measures and other
terms. The definition and calculation of these non-GAAP financial measures and other terms may
differ from the definitions and methodologies used by other REITs and, accordingly, may not be
comparable. The non-GAAP financial measures referred to below should not be considered an
alternative to net income as an indication of our performance. In addition, these non-GAAP
financial measures do not represent cash generated from operating activities in accordance with
GAAP and therefore should not be considered as an alternative measure of liquidity or as indicative
of cash available to fund cash needs.
FFO is determined based on a definition adopted by the Board of Governors of the National
Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (NAREIT). FFO is calculated by the Company as Net
income or loss attributable to common stockholders computed in accordance with GAAP, adjusted for
gains or losses on sales of previously depreciated operating communities, extraordinary gains or
losses (as defined by GAAP), cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle and depreciation
of real estate assets, including adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures.
Management generally considers FFO to be an appropriate supplemental measure of operating
performance because, by excluding gains or losses related to dispositions of previously depreciated
operating communities and excluding real estate depreciation (which can vary among owners of
identical assets in similar condition based on historical cost accounting and useful life
estimates), FFO can help one compare the operating performance of a companys real estate between
periods or as compared to different companies. A reconciliation of FFO to Net income attributable
to common stockholders is as follows (dollars in thousands):
Q1 | Q1 | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Net income attributable to common stockholders |
$ | 72,523 | $ | 47,425 | ||||
Depreciation real estate assets,
including discontinued operations
and joint venture adjustments |
57,011 | 53,525 | ||||||
Distributions to noncontrolling interests,
including discontinued operations |
14 | 25 | ||||||
Gain on sale of previously depreciated
real estate assets |
(50,291 | ) | | |||||
FFO attributable to common stockholders |
$ | 79,257 | $ | 100,975 | ||||
Average shares outstanding diluted |
82,310,670 | 79,792,281 | ||||||
Earnings per share diluted |
$ | 0.88 | $ | 0.59 | ||||
FFO per common share diluted |
$ | 0.96 | $ | 1.27 | ||||
Projected FFO, as provided within this release in the Companys outlook, is calculated
on a basis consistent with historical FFO, and is therefore considered to be an appropriate
supplemental measure to projected net income from projected operating performance. A
reconciliation of the range provided for Projected FFO per share (diluted) for the second quarter
2010 to the range provided for projected EPS (diluted) is as follows:
Attachment 13 (continued)
Low | High | |||||||
range | range | |||||||
Projected EPS (diluted) Q2 10 |
$ | 0.50 | $ | 0.56 | ||||
Projected depreciation (real estate related) |
0.67 | 0.69 | ||||||
Projected gain on sale of operating communities |
(0.24 | ) | (0.28 | ) | ||||
Projected FFO per share (diluted) Q2 10 |
$ | 0.93 | $ | 0.97 | ||||
NOI is defined by the Company as total property revenue less direct property
operating expenses (including property taxes), and excludes corporate-level income (including
management, development and other fees), corporate-level property management and other indirect
operating expenses, investments and investment management expenses, expensed development and other
pursuit costs, net interest expense, gain (loss) on extinguishment of debt, general and
administrative expense, joint venture income (loss), depreciation expense, impairment loss on land
holdings, gain on sale of real estate assets and income from discontinued operations. The Company
considers NOI to be an appropriate supplemental measure to Net Income of operating performance of a
community or communities because it helps both investors and management to understand the core
operations of a community or communities prior to the allocation of corporate-level property
management overhead or general and administrative costs. This is more reflective of the operating
performance of a community, and allows for an easier comparison of the operating performance of
single assets or groups of assets. In addition, because prospective buyers of real estate have
different overhead structures, with varying marginal impact to overhead by acquiring real estate,
NOI is considered by many in the real estate industry to be a useful measure for determining the
value of a real estate asset or groups of assets.
A reconciliation of NOI (from continuing operations) to Net Income, as well as a breakdown of NOI
by operating segment, is as follows (dollars in thousands):
Q1 | Q1 | Q4 | ||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2009 | ||||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 72,366 | $ | 47,101 | $ | 32,350 | ||||||||||
Indirect operating expenses, net of
corporate income |
7,232 | 8,575 | 7,378 | |||||||||||||
Investments and investment management expense |
1,039 | 916 | 1,045 | |||||||||||||
Expensed development and other pursuit costs |
505 | 1,093 | 746 | |||||||||||||
Interest expense, net |
42,541 | 30,130 | 42,107 | |||||||||||||
(Gain) loss on extinguishment of debt, net |
| (1,062 | ) | 26,972 | ||||||||||||
General and administrative expense |
8,895 | 7,247 | 10,360 | |||||||||||||
Joint venture loss (income) |
(227 | ) | (3,457 | ) | 2,698 | |||||||||||
Depreciation expense |
56,095 | 50,073 | 55,392 | |||||||||||||
Impairment loss land holdings |
| | 850 | |||||||||||||
Gain on sale of real estate assets |
(50,291 | ) | | (41,806 | ) | |||||||||||
Income from discontinued operations |
(1,995 | ) | (3,965 | ) | (2,570 | ) | ||||||||||
NOI from continuing operations |
$ | 136,160 | $ | 136,651 | $ | 135,522 | ||||||||||
Established: |
||||||||||||||||
New England |
$ | 21,643 | $ | 22,683 | $ | 21,918 | ||||||||||
Metro NY/NJ |
29,507 | 30,584 | 29,650 | |||||||||||||
Mid-Atlantic/Midwest |
17,546 | 18,583 | 18,233 | |||||||||||||
Pacific NW |
4,426 | 5,206 | 4,144 | |||||||||||||
No. California |
20,158 | 23,575 | 19,827 | |||||||||||||
So. California |
9,707 | 10,770 | 9,834 | |||||||||||||
Total Established |
102,987 | 111,401 | 103,606 | |||||||||||||
Other Stabilized |
16,869 | 7,841 | 16,855 | |||||||||||||
Development/Redevelopment |
16,304 | 17,409 | 15,061 | |||||||||||||
NOI from continuing operations |
$ | 136,160 | $ | 136,651 | $ | 135,522 | ||||||||||
NOI as reported by the Company does not include the operating results from discontinued
operations (i.e., assets sold during the period January 1, 2009 through March 31, 2010 or
classified as held for sale at March 31, 2010). A
Attachment 13 (continued)
reconciliation of NOI from communities sold or
classified as discontinued operations to net income for these communities is as follows (dollars in
thousands):
Q1 | Q1 | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Income from discontinued operations |
$ | 1,995 | $ | 3,965 | ||||
Interest expense, net |
| 177 | ||||||
Depreciation expense |
| 2,567 | ||||||
NOI from discontinued operations |
$ | 1,995 | $ | 6,709 | ||||
NOI from assets sold |
$ | 272 | $ | 4,901 | ||||
NOI from assets held for sale |
1,723 | 1,808 | ||||||
NOI from discontinued operations |
$ | 1,995 | $ | 6,709 | ||||
Projected NOI, as used within this release for certain Development and Redevelopment
Communities and in calculating the Initial Year Market Cap Rate for dispositions, represents
managements estimate, as of the date of this release (or as of the date of the buyers valuation
in the case of dispositions), of projected stabilized rental revenue minus projected stabilized
operating expenses. For Development and Redevelopment Communities, Projected NOI is calculated
based on the first year of Stabilized Operations, as defined below, following the completion of
construction. In calculating the Initial Year Market Cap Rate, Projected NOI for dispositions is
calculated for the first twelve months following the date of the buyers valuation. Projected
stabilized rental revenue represents managements estimate of projected gross potential (based on
leased rents for occupied homes and Market Rents, as defined below, for vacant homes) minus
projected economic vacancy and adjusted for concessions. Projected stabilized operating expenses
do not include interest, income taxes (if any), depreciation or amortization, or any allocation of
corporate-level property management overhead or general and administrative costs. The weighted
average Projected NOI as a percentage of Total Capital Cost is weighted based on the Companys
share of the Total Capital Cost of each community, based on its percentage ownership.
Management believes that Projected NOI of the Development Communities, on an aggregated weighted
average basis, assists investors in understanding managements estimate of the likely impact on
operations of the Development Communities when the assets are complete and achieve stabilized
occupancy (before allocation of any corporate-level property management overhead, general and
administrative costs or interest expense). However, in this release the Company has not given a
projection of NOI on a company-wide basis. Given the different dates and fiscal years for which
NOI is projected for these communities, the projected allocation of corporate-level property
management overhead, general and administrative costs and interest expense to communities under
development is complex, impractical to develop, and may not be meaningful. Projected NOI of these
communities is not a projection of the Companys overall financial performance or cash flow. There
can be no
assurance that the communities under development or redevelopment will achieve the Projected NOI as
described in this release.
Rental Revenue with Concessions on a Cash Basis is considered by the Company to be a
supplemental measure to rental revenue in conformity with GAAP to help investors evaluate the
impact of both current and historical concessions on GAAP based rental revenue and to more readily
enable comparisons to revenue as reported by other companies. In addition, rental revenue (with
concessions on a cash basis) allows an investor to understand the historical trend in cash
concessions.
Attachment 13 (continued)
A reconciliation of rental revenue from Established Communities in conformity with GAAP to rental
revenue (with concessions on a cash basis) is as follows (dollars in thousands):
Q1 | Q1 | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Rental revenue (GAAP basis) |
$ | 159,640 | $ | 166,566 | ||||
Concessions amortized |
1,600 | 2,908 | ||||||
Concessions granted |
(594 | ) | (2,207 | ) | ||||
Rental revenue (with
concessions on a cash basis) |
$ | 160,646 | $ | 167,267 | ||||
% change GAAP revenue |
(4.2 | %) | ||||||
% change cash revenue |
(4.0 | %) | ||||||
Economic Gain is calculated by the Company as the gain on sale in accordance with GAAP,
less accumulated depreciation through the date of sale and any other non-cash adjustments that may
be required under GAAP accounting. Management generally considers Economic Gain to be an
appropriate supplemental measure to gain on sale in accordance with GAAP because it helps investors
to understand the relationship between the cash proceeds from a sale and the cash invested in the
sold community. The Economic Gain for each of the communities presented is estimated based on
their respective final settlement statements. A reconciliation of Economic Gain to gain on sale in
accordance with GAAP for both the three months ended March 31, 2010 as well as prior years
activities is presented on Attachment 12.
Interest Coverage is calculated by the Company as EBITDA from continuing operations,
excluding land gains and gain on the sale of investments in real estate joint ventures, divided by
the sum of interest expense, net, and preferred dividends. Interest Coverage is presented by the
Company because it provides rating agencies and investors an additional means of comparing our
ability to service debt obligations to that of other companies. EBITDA is defined by the Company
as net income attributable to the Company before interest income and expense, income taxes,
depreciation and amortization.
A reconciliation of EBITDA and a calculation of Interest Coverage for the first quarter of 2010 are
as follows (dollars in thousands):
Net income attributable to common stockholders |
$ | 72,523 | ||||||
Interest expense, net |
42,541 | |||||||
Depreciation expense |
56,095 | |||||||
EBITDA |
$ | 171,159 | ||||||
EBITDA from continuing operations |
$ | 118,873 | ||||||
EBITDA from discontinued operations |
52,286 | |||||||
EBITDA |
$ | 171,159 | ||||||
EBITDA from continuing operations |
$ | 118,873 | ||||||
Interest charges |
$ | 42,541 | ||||||
Interest coverage |
2.8 | |||||||
Total Capital Cost includes all capitalized costs projected to be or actually incurred
to develop the respective Development or Redevelopment Community, or Development Right, including
land acquisition costs, construction costs, real estate taxes, capitalized interest and loan fees,
permits, professional fees, allocated development overhead and other regulatory fees, all as
determined in accordance with GAAP. For Redevelopment Communities, Total Capital Cost excludes
costs incurred prior to the start of redevelopment when indicated. With respect to communities
where development or redevelopment was completed in a prior or the current period, Total Capital
Cost
Attachment 13 (continued)
reflects the actual cost incurred, plus any contingency estimate made by management. Total
Capital Cost for communities identified as having joint venture ownership, either during
construction or upon construction completion, represents the total projected joint venture
contribution amount. For joint ventures not in construction, Total Capital Cost is equal to gross
real estate cost.
Initial Year Market Cap Rate is defined by the Company as Projected NOI of a single
community for the first 12 months of operations (assuming no repositioning), less estimates for
non-routine allowance of approximately $200 $300 per apartment home, divided by the gross sales
price for the community. Projected NOI, as referred to above, represents managements estimate of
projected rental revenue minus projected operating expenses before interest, income taxes (if any),
depreciation, amortization and extraordinary items. For this purpose, managements projection of
operating expenses for the community includes a management fee of 3.0% 3.5%. The Initial Year
Market Cap Rate, which may be determined in a different manner by others, is a measure frequently
used in the real estate industry when determining the appropriate purchase price for a property or
estimating the value for a property. Buyers may assign different Initial Year Market Cap Rates to
different communities when determining the appropriate value because they (i) may project different
rates of change in operating expenses and capital expenditure estimates and (ii) may project
different rates of change in future rental revenue due to different estimates for changes in rent
and occupancy levels. The weighted average Initial Year Market Cap Rate is weighted based on the
gross sales price of each community.
Unleveraged IRR on sold communities refers to the internal rate of return calculated by the
Company considering the timing and amounts of (i) total revenue during the period owned by the
Company and (ii) the gross sales price net of selling costs, offset by (iii) the undepreciated
capital cost of the communities at the time of sale and (iv) total direct operating expenses during
the period owned by the Company. Each of the items (i), (ii), (iii) and (iv) are calculated in
accordance with GAAP.
The calculation of Unleveraged IRR does not include an adjustment for the Companys general and
administrative expense, interest expense, or corporate-level property management and other indirect
operating expenses. Therefore, Unleveraged IRR is not a substitute for Net Income as a measure of
our performance. Management believes that the Unleveraged IRR achieved during the period a
community is owned by the Company is useful because it is one indication of the gross value created
by the Companys acquisition, development or redevelopment, management and sale of a community,
before the impact of indirect expenses and Company overhead. The Unleveraged IRR achieved on the
communities as cited in this release should not be viewed as an indication of the gross value
created with respect to other communities owned by the Company, and the Company
does not represent that it will achieve similar Unleveraged IRRs upon the disposition of other
communities. The weighted average Unleveraged IRR for sold communities is weighted based on all
cash flows over the holding period for each respective community, including net sales proceeds.
Unencumbered NOI as calculated by the Company represents NOI generated by real estate
assets unencumbered by either outstanding secured debt or land leases (excluding land leases with
purchase options that were put in place for governmental incentives or tax abatements) as a
percentage of total NOI generated by real estate assets. The Company believes that current and
prospective unsecured creditors of the Company view Unencumbered NOI as one indication of the
borrowing capacity of the Company. Therefore, when reviewed together with the Companys Interest
Coverage, EBITDA and cash flow from operations, the Company believes that investors and creditors
view Unencumbered NOI as a useful supplemental measure for determining the financial flexibility of
an entity. A calculation of Unencumbered NOI for the three months ended March 31, 2010 is as
follows (dollars in thousands):
NOI for Established Communities |
$ | 102,987 | ||
NOI for Other Stabilized Communities |
16,869 | |||
NOI for Development/Redevelopment Communities |
16,304 | |||
Total NOI generated by real estate assets |
136,160 | |||
NOI on encumbered assets |
44,934 | |||
NOI on unencumbered assets |
$ | 91,226 | ||
Unencumbered NOI |
67.0 | % | ||
Established Communities are identified by the Company as communities where a comparison
of operating results from the prior year to the current year is meaningful, as these communities
were owned and had Stabilized Operations, as defined below, as of the beginning of the prior year.
Therefore, for 2010, Established Communities are consolidated communities that have Stabilized
Operations as of January 1, 2009 and are not conducting or
Attachment 13 (continued)
planning to conduct substantial
redevelopment activities within the current year. Established Communities do not include
communities that are currently held for sale or planned for disposition during the current year.
Development Communities are communities that are under construction during the current
year. These communities may be partially or fully complete and operating.
Redevelopment Communities are communities where the Company owns a majority interest and
where substantial redevelopment is in progress or is planned to begin during the current year.
Redevelopment is considered substantial when capital invested during the reconstruction effort is
expected to exceed either $5,000,000 or 10% of the communitys pre-development basis.
Average Rental Rates are calculated by the Company as rental revenue in accordance with
GAAP, divided by the weighted average number of occupied apartment homes.
Economic Occupancy is defined as total possible revenue less vacancy loss as a percentage
of total possible revenue. Total possible revenue is determined by valuing occupied units at
contract rates and vacant units at Market Rents. Vacancy loss is determined by valuing vacant
units at current Market Rents. By measuring vacant apartments at their Market Rents, Economic
Occupancy takes into account the fact that apartment homes of different sizes and locations within
a community have different economic impacts on a communitys gross revenue.
Market Rents as reported by the Company are based on the current market rates set by the
managers of the Companys communities based on their experience in renting their communities
apartments and publicly available market data. Trends in market rents for a region as reported by
others could vary. Market Rents for a period are based on the average Market Rents during that
period and do not reflect any impact for cash concessions.
Non-Revenue Generating Capex represents capital expenditures that will not directly result
in revenue earnings or expense savings.
Stabilized/Restabilized Operations is defined as the earlier of (i) attainment of 95%
physical occupancy or (ii) the one-year anniversary of completion of development or redevelopment.
Average Rent per Home, as calculated for certain Development and Redevelopment Communities
in lease-up, reflects (i) actual average leased rents for those apartments leased through the end
of the quarter net of estimated stabilized concessions, (ii) estimated market rents net of
comparable concessions for all unleased apartments and (iii) includes actual and estimated other
rental revenue. For Development and Redevelopment Communities not yet in lease-up, Average Rent
per Home reflects managements projected rents.
Development Rights are development opportunities in the early phase of the development
process for which the Company either has an option to acquire land or enter into a leasehold
interest, for which the Company is the buyer under a long-term conditional contract to purchase
land or where the Company owns land to develop a new community. The Company capitalizes related
predevelopment costs incurred in pursuit of new developments for which future development is
probable.