UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004

Commission file number 1-12672

AVALONBAY COMMUNITIES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

2900 Eisenhower Avenue, Suite 300
Alexandria, Virginia 22314
(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)

(703) 329-6300
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

(Former name, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding twelve (12) months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past ninety (90) days.

Yes   ý         No   ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).

Yes   ý         No   ¨

APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock as of the latest practicable date:

71,951,226 shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, were outstanding as of July 30, 2004

AVALONBAY COMMUNITIES, INC.
FORM 10-Q
INDEX

PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION

AVALONBAY COMMUNITIES, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

See accompanying notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

1

AVALONBAY COMMUNITIES, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
AND OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

See accompanying notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

2

AVALONBAY COMMUNITIES, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands)

See accompanying notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

3

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (continued)

Supplemental disclosures of non-cash investing and financing activities (dollars in thousands):

During the six months ended June 30, 2004:

During the six months ended June 30, 2003:

4

AVALONBAY COMMUNITIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

1. Organization and Significant Accounting Policies

Organization

AvalonBay Communities, Inc. (the “Company,” which term, unless the context otherwise requires, refers to AvalonBay Communities, Inc. together with its subsidiaries) is a Maryland corporation that has elected to be taxed as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. The Company focuses on the ownership and operation of apartment communities in high barrier-to-entry markets of the United States. These markets are located in the Northeast, Mid-Atlantic, Midwest, Pacific Northwest, and Northern and Southern California regions of the country.

At June 30, 2004, the Company owned or held a direct or indirect ownership interest in 133 operating apartment communities containing 38,527 apartment homes in ten states and the District of Columbia, of which one community containing 781 apartment homes was under reconstruction. In addition, the Company owned or held a direct or indirect ownership interest in 14 communities under construction that are expected to contain an aggregate of 4,149 apartment homes when completed. The Company also owned a direct or indirect ownership interest in rights to develop an additional 40 communities that, if developed in the manner expected, will contain an estimated 10,728 apartment homes.

During the three months ended June 30, 2004:

The interim unaudited financial statements have been prepared in accordance with GAAP for interim financial information and in conjunction with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements required by GAAP have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. These unaudited financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003. The results of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2004 are not necessarily indicative of the operating results for the full year. Management believes the disclosures are adequate to ensure the information presented is not misleading. In the opinion of management, all adjustments and eliminations, consisting only of normal, recurring adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the financial statements for the interim periods, have been included.

5

Principles of Consolidation

The Company assesses consolidation of variable interest entities under the guidance of FASB Interpretation No. 46 (“FIN 46”), “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, an Interpretation of ARB No. 51,” as revised in December 2003. The Company accounts for joint venture partnerships and subsidiary partnerships structured as DownREITs that are not variable interest entities in accordance with Statement of Position (“SOP”) 78-9, “Accounting for Investments in Real Estate Ventures.” Under SOP 78-9, the Company consolidates joint venture and DownREIT partnerships when the Company controls the major operating and financial policies of the partnership through majority ownership or in its capacity as general partner. The accompanying Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned partnerships, certain joint venture partnerships, subsidiary partnerships structured as DownREITs and one variable interest entity under FIN 46. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

In each of the partnerships structured as DownREITs, either the Company or one of the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiaries is the general partner, and there are one or more limited partners whose interest in the partnership is represented by units of limited partnership interest. For each DownREIT partnership, limited partners are entitled to receive an initial distribution before any distribution is made to the general partner. Although the partnership agreements for each of the DownREITs are different, generally the distributions per unit paid to the holders of units of limited partnership interests have approximated the Company’s current common stock dividend per share. Each DownREIT partnership has been structured so that it is unlikely the limited partners will be entitled to a distribution greater than the initial distribution provided for in the partnership agreement. The holders of units of limited partnership interest have the right to present each unit of limited partnership interest for redemption for cash equal to the fair market value of a share of the Company’s common stock on the date of redemption. In lieu of a cash redemption by the partnership of a limited partner’s unit, the Company may elect to acquire any unit presented for redemption for one share of common stock or for such cash amount.

The Company accounts for investments in unconsolidated entities that are not variable interest entities in accordance with SOP 78-9 and Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion No. 18, “The Equity Method of Accounting for Investments in Common Stock.” The Company uses the equity method to account for investments in which it owns greater than 20% of the equity value or has significant and disproportionate influence over that entity. Investments in which the Company owns 20% or less of the equity value and does not have significant and disproportionate influence are accounted for using the cost method. If there is an event or change in circumstance that indicates a loss in the value of an investment, the Company’s policy is to record the loss and reduce the value of the investment to its fair value. A loss in value would be indicated if the Company could not recover the carrying value of the investment or if the investee could not sustain an earnings capacity that would justify the carrying amount of the investment.

Revenue Recognition

Rental income related to leases is recognized on an accrual basis when due from residents in accordance with Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104, “Revenue Recognition” and Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 13, “Accounting for Leases.” In accordance with the Company’s standard lease terms, rental payments are generally due on a monthly basis. Any cash concessions given at the inception of the lease are amortized over the approximate life of the lease, which is generally one year.

Real Estate

Significant expenditures which improve or extend the life of an asset are capitalized. The operating real estate assets are stated at cost and consist of land, buildings and improvements, furniture, fixtures and equipment, and other costs incurred during their development, redevelopment and acquisition. Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged to operations as incurred.

The Company’s policy with respect to capital expenditures is generally to capitalize only non-recurring expenditures. Improvements and upgrades are capitalized only if the item exceeds $15, extends the useful life of the asset and is not related to making an apartment home ready for the next resident. Purchases of personal property, such as computers and furniture, are capitalized only if the item is a new addition and exceeds $2.5. The Company generally expenses purchases of personal property made for replacement purposes.

6

The capitalization of costs during the development of assets (including interest and related loan fees, property taxes and other direct and indirect costs) begins when active development commences and ends when the asset, or a portion of an asset, is delivered and is ready for its intended use, which is generally indicated by the issuance of a certificate of occupancy. Cost capitalization during redevelopment of apartment homes (including interest and related loan fees, property taxes and other direct and indirect costs) begins when an apartment home is taken out-of-service for redevelopment and ends when the apartment home redevelopment is completed and the apartment home is available for a new resident.

In accordance with SFAS No. 67, “Accounting for Costs and Initial Rental Operations of Real Estate Projects,” the Company capitalizes pre-development costs incurred in pursuit of new development opportunities for which the Company currently believes future development is probable (“Development Rights”). Future development of these Development Rights is dependent upon various factors, including zoning and regulatory approval, rental market conditions, construction costs and availability of capital. Pre-development costs incurred in the pursuit of Development Rights for which future development is not yet considered probable are expensed as incurred. In addition, if the status of a Development Right changes, deeming future development no longer probable, any capitalized pre-development costs are written-off with a charge to expense. Abandoned pursuit costs were $1,177 and $1,050 for the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

Depreciation is calculated on buildings and improvements using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives, which range from seven to thirty years. Furniture, fixtures and equipment are generally depreciated using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives, which range from three years (primarily computer-related equipment) to seven years.

Lease terms for apartment homes are generally one year or less. Rental income and operating costs incurred during the initial lease-up or post-redevelopment lease-up period are fully recognized as they accrue.

If there is an event or change in circumstance that indicates an impairment in the value of an operating community, the Company’s policy is to assess any impairment in value by making a comparison of the current and projected operating cash flows of the community over its remaining useful life, on an undiscounted basis, to the carrying amount of the community. If the carrying amount is in excess of the estimated projected operating cash flows of the community, the Company would recognize an impairment loss equivalent to an amount required to adjust the carrying amount to its estimated fair market value.

Deferred Financing Costs

Deferred financing costs include fees and costs incurred to obtain debt financing and are amortized on a straight-line basis, which approximates the effective interest method, over the shorter of the term of the loan or the related credit enhancement facility, if applicable. Unamortized financing costs are written-off when debt is retired before the maturity date. Accumulated amortization of deferred financing costs was $21,375 at June 30, 2004 and $19,266 at December 31, 2003.

Cash, Cash Equivalents and Cash in Escrow

Cash and cash equivalents include all cash and liquid investments with an original maturity of six months or less from the date acquired. The majority of the Company’s cash, cash equivalents and cash in escrows is held at major commercial banks.

Interest Rate Contracts

The Company utilizes derivative financial instruments to manage interest rate risk and has designated these financial instruments as hedges under the guidance of SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,” and SFAS No. 138, “Accounting for Certain Instruments and Certain Hedging Activities, an Amendment of Statement No. 133.” For fair value hedge transactions, changes in the fair value of the derivative instrument and changes in the fair value of the hedged item due to the risk being hedged are recognized in current period earnings. For cash flow hedge transactions, changes in the fair value of the derivative instrument are reported in other comprehensive income. For cash flow hedges where the changes in the fair value of the derivative exceed the change in fair value of the

7

hedged item, the ineffective portion is recognized in current period earnings. Derivatives which are not part of a hedge relationship are recorded at fair value through earnings. As of June 30, 2004, the Company had approximately $207,000 in variable rate debt subject to cash flow hedges. See Note 5, “Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.”

Comprehensive Income

Comprehensive income, as reflected on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Other Comprehensive Income, is defined as all changes in equity during each period except for those resulting from investments by or distributions to shareholders. Accumulated other comprehensive loss as reflected in Note 4, “Stockholders’ Equity,” reflects the changes in the fair value of effective cash flow hedges.

Earnings per Common Share

In accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 128, “Earnings per Share,” basic earnings per share is computed by dividing earnings available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period. Other potentially dilutive common shares, and the related impact to earnings, are considered when calculating earnings per share on a diluted basis. The Company’s earnings per common share are determined as follows:

Certain employee options to purchase shares of common stock of 3,000 were outstanding during both the three and six months ended June 30, 2004 and 1,459,439 and 1,521,360 were outstanding during the three and six months ended June 30, 2003, respectively, but were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because the options’ exercise prices were greater than the average market price of the common shares for the period and therefore, are anti-dilutive.

8

Stock-Based Compensation

Effective January 1, 2003, the Company adopted the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” as amended by SFAS No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation – Transition and Disclosure – an amendment of FASB Statement No. 123,” prospectively to all employee awards granted, modified, or settled on or after January 1, 2003. Awards under the Company’s stock option plans vest over periods ranging from one to three years. Therefore, the cost related to stock-based employee compensation for employee stock options included in the determination of net income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, is less than that which would have been recognized if the fair value based method had been applied to all awards since the original effective date of SFAS No. 123.

The following table illustrates the effect on net income available to common stockholders and earnings per share if the fair value based method had been applied to all outstanding and unvested awards in each period based on the fair market value as determined on the date of grant:

Variable Interest Entities under FIN 46

In December 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued the revised FIN 46, which changed the guidelines for consolidation of and disclosure related to unconsolidated entities, if those unconsolidated entities qualify as variable interest entities as defined in FIN 46. The Company had previously adopted the provisions of FIN 46 for variable interest entities created after January 31, 2003. However, the adoption of FIN 46 for variable interest entities created on or before January 31, 2003 was required for periods ending after March 15, 2004. The Company has adopted the final provisions of FIN 46 as of January 1, 2004, resulting in the consolidation of one entity from which the Company holds a participating mortgage loan as described in Note 9, “Related Party Arrangements.” The consolidation of this entity resulted in an increase to net real estate assets of approximately $33,000 and the elimination of the previously recorded mortgage note and accrued interest of approximately $27,300. In addition, the Company recognized a cumulative effect of change in accounting principle during the six months ended June 30, 2004 in the amount of $4,547, which increased earnings per common share – diluted by $0.06. The Company does not hold an equity interest in this entity, and therefore 100% of the entity’s net income or loss is recognized by the Company as minority interest in consolidated partnerships on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Other Comprehensive Income.

Discontinued Operations

On January 1, 2002, the Company adopted SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets” which requires that the assets and liabilities and the results of operations of any communities which have been sold since January 1, 2002, or otherwise qualify as held for sale, be presented as discontinued operations in the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in both current and prior periods presented. The community specific components of net income that are presented as discontinued operations include net operating income, depreciation expense, minority interest expense and interest expense. In addition, the net gain or loss

9

(including any impairment loss) on the eventual disposal of communities held for sale will be presented as discontinued operations when recognized. A change in presentation for discontinued operations will not have any impact on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations. Real estate assets held for sale are measured at the lower of the carrying amount or the fair value less the cost to sell, and are presented separately in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. Subsequent to classification of a community as held for sale, no further depreciation is recorded on the assets.

Improved Land Acquisitions

During the three months ended June 30, 2004, the Company acquired two parcels of improved land in connection with two Development Rights for an aggregate purchase price of $21,800, which included the assumption of $13,322 in debt. The Company intends to manage the current improvements, which are occupied office buildings, until such time as all tenant obligations have been satisfied or eliminated through negotiation and construction of new apartment communities is ready to begin. As such, as provided under the guidance of SFAS No. 67, the revenue from incidental operations received from the current improvements in excess of any incremental costs are being recorded as a reduction of total capitalized costs and not as part of net income.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions. These estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Revised Financial Presentation for Preferred Stock Redemption

In July 2003, the Securities and Exchange Commission clarified Emerging Issues Task Force Topic D-42, “The Effect on the Calculation of Earnings per Share for the Redemption or Induced Conversion of Preferred Stock,” which was applied retroactively. As such, the Company revised its historical results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003 to reflect additional dividends attributable to preferred stock of $280. This revision did not have any impact on earnings per common share – diluted during those periods.

Reclassifications

Certain reclassifications have been made to amounts in prior period’s financial statements to conform with current period presentations.

2.    Interest Capitalized

Capitalized interest associated with communities under development or redevelopment totaled $5,010 and $6,305 for the three months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively, and $10,078 and $12,511 for the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

10

3.    Notes Payable, Unsecured Notes and Credit Facility

The Company’s mortgage notes payable, unsecured notes and variable rate unsecured credit facility as of June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003 are summarized as follows:

During the six months ended June 30, 2004, the Company repaid $125,000 of previously issued unsecured notes, along with any unpaid interest, pursuant to their scheduled maturity, and no prepayment fees were incurred. In addition, the Company issued $150,000 in unsecured notes under its existing shelf registration statement at an interest rate of 5.375%. Interest on these newly issued notes is payable semi-annually on April 15 and October 15, and they mature on April 15, 2014. The Company’s unsecured notes contain a number of financial and other covenants with which the Company must comply, including, but not limited to, limits on the aggregate amount of total and secured indebtedness the Company may have on a consolidated basis and limits on the Company’s required debt service payments.

During the six months ended June 30, 2004, the Company repaid $24,251 in fixed rate mortgage debt secured by two current communities, along with any unpaid interest, repaid $10,400 in variable rate, tax-exempt debt related to the sale of a community and transferred $18,755 in variable rate, tax-exempt debt related to the sale of a community to the purchaser. In addition, the Company issued $42,800 in variable rate, conventional mortgage debt on two communities and assumed $13,322 in fixed rate debt in connection with the acquisition of two parcels of improved land. In the aggregate, mortgage notes payable mature at various dates from April 2005 through April 2043 and are secured by certain apartment communities. As of June 30, 2004, the Company has guaranteed approximately $112,000 of mortgage notes payable held by subsidiaries; all such mortgage notes payable are consolidated for financial reporting purposes. The weighted average interest rate of the Company’s fixed rate mortgage notes payable (conventional and tax-exempt) was 6.9% at June 30, 2004 and 6.7% at December 31, 2003. The weighted average interest rate of the Company’s variable rate mortgage notes payable and its unsecured credit facility (as discussed below), including the effect of certain financing related fees, was 2.8% at June 30, 2004 and 3.5% at December 31, 2003.

As of June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, the Company had approximately $70,000 and $158,000, respectively, of variable rate, tax-exempt debt effectively fixed through Hedged Derivatives, as described in Note 5, “Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.” In February 2004, the credit enhancements, including Hedged Derivatives in the form of interest rate swaps, on approximately $87,000 of this variable rate, tax-exempt debt expired according to their original terms and were not extended. New Hedged Derivatives in the form of interest rate protection agreements were put in place on the $87,000 of variable rate, tax-exempt debt, which serve to effectively limit the level to which interest rates can rise to a range of 6.7% to 9.0%. This $87,000 of variable rate, tax-exempt debt floats at an average coupon interest rate of 1.6% as of June 30, 2004. In addition, in May 2004, the Company entered into Hedged Derivatives in the form of interest rate protection agreements on the newly issued $42,800 in variable rate, conventional debt discussed above. This debt has a weighted average variable interest rate of 2.5% as of June 30, 2004, and the Hedged Derivatives serve to effectively limit the level to which interest rates can rise on this debt to 10.0%.

11

Scheduled payments and maturities of mortgage notes payable and unsecured notes outstanding at June 30, 2004 are as follows:

The Company has a $500,000 revolving variable rate unsecured credit facility with JPMorgan Chase Bank and Wachovia Bank, N.A. serving as banks and syndication agents for a syndicate of commercial banks, which the Company refinanced in May 2004, concurrent with its original maturity date. The Company had $128,900 outstanding under the facility and $22,196 in letters of credit on June 30, 2004 and $51,100 outstanding and $19,901 in letters of credit on December 31, 2003. Under the terms of the new credit facility, which are substantially consistent with the terms of the old facility, if the Company elects to increase the facility by up to an additional $150,000, and one or more banks (from the syndicate or otherwise) voluntarily agree to provide the additional commitment, then the Company will be able to increase the facility up to $650,000, and no member of the syndicate of banks can prohibit such increase; such an increase in the facility will only be effective to the extent banks (from the syndicate or otherwise) choose to commit to lend additional funds. The Company pays participating banks, in the aggregate, an annual facility fee of approximately $750 in quarterly installments. The unsecured credit facility bears interest at varying levels based on the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”), rating levels achieved on the Company’s unsecured notes and on a maturity schedule selected by the Company. The current stated pricing is LIBOR plus 0.55% per annum (1.92% on June 30, 2004). The spread over LIBOR can vary from LIBOR plus 0.50% to LIBOR plus 1.15% based upon the rating of the Company’s long-term unsecured debt. In addition, the unsecured credit facility includes a competitive bid option, which allows banks that are part of the lender consortium to bid to make loans to the Company at a rate that is lower than the stated rate provided by the unsecured credit facility for up to $250,000. The competitive bid option may result in lower pricing if market conditions allow. The Company had no balance outstanding under this competitive bid option at June 30, 2004. The Company is subject to (i) certain customary covenants under the unsecured credit facility, including, but not limited to, maintaining certain maximum leverage ratios, a minimum fixed charges coverage ratio and minimum unencumbered assets and equity levels and (ii) prohibitions on paying dividends in amounts that exceed 95% of the Company’s Funds from Operations, as defined therein, except as may be required to maintain the Company’s REIT status. The new facility matures in May 2008, assuming exercise of a one-year renewal option by the Company.

12

4.    Stockholders’ Equity

The following summarizes the changes in stockholders’ equity for the six months ended June 30, 2004:

During the six months ended June 30, 2004, the Company (i) issued 794,449 shares of common stock in connection with stock options exercised, (ii) issued 49,391 shares of common stock in exchange for the redemption of an equal number of DownREIT limited partnership units, (iii) issued 147,517 common shares in connection with stock grants to employees of which 80% are restricted, (iv) had forfeitures of 72 shares of restricted stock grants to employees and (v) withheld 49,583 shares to satisfy employees’ tax withholding and other liabilities.

Dividends per common share for both the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 were $1.40 per share. In the six months ended June 30, 2004, average dividends for all non-redeemed preferred shares during the period were $1.09 per share, and no preferred shares were redeemed. In the six months ended June 30, 2003, average dividends for preferred shares redeemed during the period were $0.31 per share and average dividends for all non-redeemed preferred shares were $1.09 per share. As announced in March 2004, the Company resumed its Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan (the “DRIP”) effective with the Company’s common stock dividend for the three months ended June 30, 2004.

5.    Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities

The Company has historically used interest rate swap and cap agreements (collectively, the “Hedged Derivatives”) to reduce the impact of interest rate fluctuations on its variable rate, tax-exempt bonds. The Company has not entered into any interest rate hedge agreements or treasury locks for its conventional unsecured debt and does not hold interest rate hedge agreements for trading or other speculative purposes. As of June 30, 2004, the Hedged Derivatives fix approximately $70,000 of the Company’s tax-exempt debt at a weighted average interest rate of 6.3% through interest rate swaps. In addition, as of June 30, 2004, the Company has Hedged Derivatives on $137,000 of its variable rate debt, which floats at a weighted average coupon interest rate of 1.9% and has been capped at a weighted average interest rate of 8.2% through interest rate caps. These Hedged Derivatives have maturity dates ranging from 2007 to 2010. In addition, one of the Company’s unconsolidated real estate investments (see Note 6, “Investments in Unconsolidated Real Estate Entities”) has $22,500 in variable rate debt outstanding as of June 30, 2004, which is subject to an interest rate swap. This debt is not recourse to or guaranteed by the Company. The Hedged Derivatives are accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 133, which as amended, was adopted by the Company on January 1, 2001. SFAS No. 133 requires that every derivative instrument be recorded on the balance sheet as either an asset or liability measured at its fair value, with changes in fair value recognized currently in earnings unless specific hedge accounting criteria are met.

The Company has determined that its Hedged Derivatives qualify as effective cash-flow hedges under SFAS No. 133, resulting in the Company recording all changes in the fair value of the Hedged Derivatives in other comprehensive income. Amounts recorded in other comprehensive income will be reclassified into earnings in the period in which earnings are affected by the hedged cash flows. To adjust the Hedged Derivatives to their fair value, the Company recorded unrealized gains to other comprehensive income of $935 and $491 during the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The estimated amount, included in accumulated other comprehensive income as of June 30,

13

2004, expected to be reclassified into earnings within the next twelve months to offset the variability of cash flows during this period is not material.

The Company assesses, both at inception and on an on-going basis, the effectiveness of all hedges in offsetting cash flows of hedged items. Hedge ineffectiveness did not have a material impact on earnings and the Company does not anticipate that it will have a material effect in the future. The fair values of the obligations under the Hedged Derivatives are included in accrued expenses and other liabilities on the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.

By using derivative financial instruments to hedge exposures to changes in interest rates, the Company exposes itself to credit risk and market risk. The credit risk is the risk of a counterparty not performing under the terms of the Hedged Derivatives. The counterparties to these Hedged Derivatives are major financial institutions which have an A+ or better credit rating by the Standard & Poor’s Ratings Group. The Company monitors the credit ratings of counterparties and the amount of the Company’s debt subject to Hedged Derivatives with any one party. Therefore, the Company believes the likelihood of realizing material losses from counterparty non-performance is remote. Market risk is the adverse effect of the value of financial instruments that results from a change in interest rates. The market risk associated with interest-rate contracts is managed by the establishment and monitoring of parameters that limit the types and degree of market risk that may be undertaken. These risks are managed by the Company’s Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President — Finance.

6.    Investments in Unconsolidated Real Estate Entities

The Company accounts for investments in unconsolidated real estate entities that are not considered variable interest entities under FIN 46 in accordance with SOP 78-9 and APB Opinion No. 18. The Company applies the equity method of accounting to an investment in an entity if it owns greater than 20% of the equity value or has significant and disproportionate influence over that entity. At June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, the Company’s investments in unconsolidated real estate entities accounted for under the equity method of accounting consisted of:

In addition, during the six months ended June 30, 2004, the Company entered into the following joint venture agreements:

14

The following is a combined summary of the financial position of the entities accounted for using the equity method, as of the dates presented:

The following is a combined summary of the operating results of the entities accounted for using the equity method, for the periods presented:

The Company also holds a 25% limited liability company membership interest in the limited liability company that owns Avalon on the Sound. The Company, which originally owned 100% of the limited liability company, sold a 75% controlling interest in the limited liability company to a third-party in 2000. As part of the sale, the Company retained an option to repurchase the 75% interest. The Company believes it is unlikely that the repurchase option will be exercised. This repurchase option will terminate in December 2004. In accordance with SFAS No. 66, “Accounting for Sales of Real Estate,” the sale of the 75% interest is not recognized due to the existence of the repurchase option, and therefore the Company accounts for Avalon on the Sound as a profit-sharing arrangement. As a result, the revenues and expenses, and assets and liabilities of Avalon on the Sound are included in the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, with the 75% interest presented as part of accrued expenses and other liabilities on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. The income allocated to the controlling partner is shown as venture partner interest in profit-sharing on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Other Comprehensive Income.

15

7.    Discontinued Operations – Real Estate Assets Sold or Held for Sale

During the six months ended June 30, 2004, the Company sold two communities, one located in Seattle, Washington and one located in Laguna Niguel, California. These two communities, which contained a total of 597 apartment homes, were sold for an aggregate sales price of $61,100, resulting in the transfer of debt of $18,755, net proceeds of $40,909 and a gain calculated in accordance with GAAP of $12,375. One of the communities sold had debt of $10,400 which was extinguished immediately prior to the sale. During the six months ended June 30, 2003, the Company sold seven communities, five comprising the entire Minneapolis, Minnesota portfolio, and two single asset sales, one in Los Angeles, California and one in Huntington Beach, California. These seven communities, which contained a total of 2,091 apartment homes, were sold for an aggregate sales price of $232,155, resulting in the transfer of debt of $27,305, net proceeds of $202,845 and a gain in accordance with GAAP of $68,583.

In addition, as of June 30, 2004, the Company had one community that qualified as held for sale under the provisions of SFAS No. 144. As required under SFAS No. 144, the operations for any communities sold from January 1, 2003 through June 30, 2004 and communities held for sale as of June 30, 2004 have been presented as discontinued operations in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Accordingly, certain reclassifications have been made in prior years to reflect discontinued operations consistent with current period presentation. The following is a summary of income from discontinued operations for the periods presented:

The Company’s Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets include other assets (excluding net real estate) of $356 and $1,428, other liabilities of $613 and $1,084 and mortgage notes payable of $0 and $29,155 as of June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively, relating to real estate assets sold or held for sale. The estimated proceeds less anticipated costs to sell the real estate asset held for sale as of June 30, 2004 are greater than the carrying value as of June 30, 2004, and therefore no provision for possible loss was recorded.

8.    Segment Reporting

The Company’s reportable operating segments include Established Communities, Other Stabilized Communities, and Development/Redevelopment Communities. Annually as of January 1st, the Company determines which of its communities fall into each of these categories and maintains that classification throughout the year for the purpose of reporting segment operations.

16

In addition, the Company owns land held for future development and has other corporate assets that are not allocated to an operating segment.

SFAS No. 131, “Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information,” requires that segment disclosures present the
measure(s) used by the chief operating decision maker for purposes of assessing such segments’ performance. The Company’s chief operating decision maker is comprised of several members of its executive management team who use Net Operating Income (“NOI”) as the primary financial measure for Established and Other Stabilized Communities. NOI is defined by the Company as total revenue less direct property operating expenses, including property taxes, and excludes corporate-level property management and other indirect operating expenses, interest income and expense, general and administrative expense, equity in income of unconsolidated entities, minority interest in consolidated partnerships, venture partner interest in profit-sharing, depreciation expense, cumulative effect of change in accounting principle, gain on sale of communities and income from discontinued operations. Although the Company considers NOI a useful measure of a community’s or communities’ operating performance, NOI should not be considered an alternative to net income or net cash flow from operating activities, as determined in accordance with GAAP.

The primary performance measure for communities under development or redevelopment depends on the stage of completion. While under development, management monitors actual construction costs against budgeted costs as well as lease-up pace and rent levels compared to budget.

17

The following table provides details of the Company’s segment information as of the dates specified. The segments are classified based on the individual community’s status as of the beginning of the given calendar year. Therefore, each year the composition of communities within each business segment is adjusted. Accordingly, the amounts between years are not directly comparable. The accounting policies applicable to the operating segments described above are the same as those described in Note 1, “Organization and Significant Accounting Policies.”

Segment information for the periods ending June 30, 2004 and 2003 has been adjusted for the communities that were designated as held for sale as of June 30, 2004 or sold from January 1, 2003 through June 30, 2004 as described in Note 7, “Discontinued Operations – Real Estate Assets Sold or Held for Sale.”

18

9.    Related Party Arrangements

Purchase of Mortgage Loan

Concurrent with its initial public offering in November 1993, Avalon Properties, Inc. (“Avalon”), a predecessor entity, purchased an existing participating mortgage loan made to Arbor Commons Associates Limited Partnership (“Arbor Commons Associates”), which owns Avalon Arbor, a 302 apartment home community in Shrewsbury, Massachusetts. Prior to May 2004, the Company’s Chairman and CEO held an equity interest in Arbor Commons Associates. In May 2004, the Company’s Chairman and CEO fully disposed of his equity interests in Arbor Commons Associates. This mortgage loan accrues interest at a fixed rate of 10.2% per annum, payable at 9.0% per annum, matures in November 2005 and is secured by the interest in Avalon Arbor. Under the terms of the loan, the Company (as successor to Avalon) receives (as contingent interest) 50% of the cash flow after the 10.2% accrual rate is paid and 50% of the residual profits upon the sale of the community. As of December 31, 2003, the Company reported a note receivable of $21,483 and accrued interest on the note of $5,834. Related interest income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003 was $813 and $1,606, respectively. Beginning January 1, 2004, the Company consolidates the financial position and results of operations of Arbor Commons Associates under the requirements of FIN 46 as discussed in Note 1, “Organization and Significant Accounting Policies.” As such, the note receivable, related accrued interest and interest income as of and for the six months ended June 30, 2004 have been eliminated in consolidation.

During the six months ended June 30, 2004, Arbor Commons Associates has been unable to make its mortgage note payment on several occasions, resulting in a default on the mortgage loan. The Company is currently negotiating to receive either payment in full of the note or a deed-in-lieu of foreclosure. The Company believes that the assets related to Arbor Commons Associates as reflected on the Condensed Consolidated Balances Sheets as of June 30, 2004 are fully realizable.

Unconsolidated Entities

The Company manages several unconsolidated real estate joint venture entities for which it receives management fee revenue. From these entities the Company received management fee revenue of $181 and $351 in the three and six months ended June 30, 2004, respectively, and $228 and $465 in the three and six months ended June 30, 2003, respectively.

Director Compensation

The Company’s 1994 Plan provides that directors of the Company who are also employees receive no additional compensation for their services as a director. In accordance with the Company’s 1994 Plan, as then in effect, on the fifth business day following the Company’s May 2003 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, each of the Company’s non-employee directors automatically received options to purchase 7,000 shares of common stock at the last reported sale price of the common stock on the NYSE on such date, and a restricted stock grant (or, in lieu thereof, a deferred stock award) of 2,500 shares of common stock. On May 14, 2003, the Company’s Board of Directors approved an amendment to the 1994 Plan pursuant to which, in lieu of the stock and option awards described above, each non-employee director would receive, following the 2004 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and each annual meeting thereafter, (i) a number of shares of restricted stock (or deferred stock awards) having a value of $100 based on the last reported sale price of the common stock on the NYSE on the fifth business day following the prior year’s annual meeting and (ii) $30 cash, payable in quarterly installments of $7.5. A non-employee director may elect to receive all or a portion of such cash payment in the form of a deferred stock award. The Company recorded compensation expense relating to the restricted stock grants, deferred stock awards and stock options in the amount of $226 and $456 in the three and six months ended June 30, 2004, respectively, and $207 and $367 in the three and six months ended June 30, 2003, respectively. Deferred compensation relating to these restricted stock grants, deferred stock awards and stock options was $903 and $722 on June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively.

19

Investment in Realeum, Inc.

As an employee incentive and retention mechanism, the Company arranged for officers of the Company to hold direct or indirect interests in the common stock of Realeum, Inc (“Realeum”). Realeum is a company involved in the development and deployment of a property management and leasing automation system in which the Company invested $2,300 in January 2002, but has a carrying value of $0 as of June 30, 2004. In April 2004, Realeum was merged into a third-party, and in connection with such merger, all shares of Realeum common stock (including those held directly or indirectly by officers of the Company) were cancelled without payment of consideration. The Company still utilizes the property management and leasing automation system and has paid $124 and $123 to Realeum under the terms of its licensing arrangements during the three months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively, and $268 and $223 for the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

10.    Subsequent Events

Subsequent to June 30, 2004, one community previously held for operating purposes was classified as held for sale under SFAS No. 144. This community has a net real estate carrying value of $16,611 as of June 30, 2004. The Company is actively pursuing the disposition of this community and expects to close during the last six months of 2004. In addition, the Company is no longer pursuing the disposition of the one community that was held for sale as of June 30, 2004. Therefore, this community will be reclassified as held for operating purposes at its carrying amount prior to being classified as held for sale, adjusted for suspended depreciation, which is less than the current fair value.

In July 2004, the Company acquired Briarcliffe Lakeside Apartments, located in Chicago, Illinois. This garden-style community contains 204 apartment homes and was acquired for an acquisition price of $14,200, which includes the assumption of $8,155 of fixed rate mortgage debt.

Also in July 2004, the Company sold a parcel of land in connection with a Development Right in Washington, DC for a gross sales price of $7,374, resulting in a GAAP gain. In connection with this land sale, the Company sold to the same buyer certain transferable development rights acquired with the adjacent parcel of land on which a current operating community was developed, for a sales price of $2,553. The Company received net proceeds of approximately $9,648 as a result of this transaction.

20

We are a real estate investment trust, or REIT, incorporated in the state of Maryland and focused on the ownership and operation of apartment communities in high barrier-to-entry markets of the United States. As of July 30, 2004, we had 134 current operating communities, which are the primary contributors to our overall operating performance. The net operating income of these communities, which is one of the financial measures that we use to evaluate community performance, is affected by the demand and supply dynamics within our markets, our rental rates and occupancy levels, and our ability to control operating costs. Our overall operating performance is also impacted by the general availability and cost of capital and the performance of our newly developed and acquired apartment communities. We seek to create long-term shareholder value by accessing capital on cost effective terms, deploying that capital to develop, redevelop and acquire apartment communities in high barrier-to-entry markets, operating apartments and selling communities when they no longer meet our long-term investment strategy and when pricing is attractive.

This Form 10-Q, including the following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations, contains forward-looking statements that predict or indicate future events and trends that do not report historical matters. Actual results or developments could differ materially from those projected in such statements as a result of the risk factors set forth on page 47 of this report. The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and notes included elsewhere in this report.

Business Description and Community Information Overview

We believe that apartment communities present an attractive long-term investment opportunity compared to other real estate investments because a broad potential resident base should result in relatively stable demand over a real estate cycle. We intend to continue to pursue real estate investments in markets where constraints to new supply exist, and where new household formations are expected to out-pace multifamily permit activity over the course of the real estate cycle. Barriers-to-entry in our markets generally include a difficult and lengthy entitlement process with local jurisdictions and dense urban or suburban areas where zoned and entitled land is in limited supply. We regularly evaluate and monitor the allocation of our investments by the amount of invested capital and by product type within our individual markets, which are located in the Northeast, Mid-Atlantic, Midwest, Pacific Northwest, and Northern and Southern California regions of the United States. Our strategy is to more deeply penetrate these markets with a broad range of products and services, with an intense focus on our customer. A substantial majority of our current communities are upscale, which generally command among the highest rents in their markets. We also pursue the ownership and operation of apartment communities that target a variety of customer segments and price points, consistent with our goal of offering a broad range of products and services. We believe that, over an entire business cycle, lower housing affordability and the limited new supply of apartment homes in our markets will result in a higher propensity to rent and larger increases in cash flows relative to other markets.

However, we believe we are at the end of a period of the business cycle where rents have been resetting to lower levels, which resulted in a decline in cash flows in recent years. A number of our markets experienced economic contraction due to job losses in 2002 and 2003, particularly in the technology, telecom and financial services sectors. This resulted in a prolonged period of weak apartment market fundamentals as reflected in declining rental rates and demand. However, the rate of decline has been diminishing, and 2004 appears to be a year of transition where apartment fundamentals become balanced in our markets, creating a platform for future growth. In the first half of 2004, the economy has shown signs of recovery as evidenced by stronger job growth and declining unemployment claims. Continued improvement in the economic environment should result in the stabilization of apartment market fundamentals and an improved demand and supply balance during the remainder of the year. We are beginning to experience the initial signs of improving apartment market fundamentals as reflected in increasing economic occupancy, decreasing availability of apartment homes and relatively flat market rents. Our Established Community portfolio achieved sequential monthly revenue growth in each of the five

21

months ended June 30, 2004, providing further evidence of economic recovery. Occupancy is currently above 95%, which is generally a point at which we can regain pricing power. Therefore, we expect declines in rental revenue for these communities to be modest for the full year of 2004 as compared to 2003 and to significantly diminish from the declines experienced last year.

In response to transitioning apartment fundamentals, we are adjusting our business activity to position for the next expansionary cycle. We are continuing our disposition activity, although at a reduced level as compared to 2003, and are increasing our development and acquisition volume in anticipation of stronger apartment demand and in anticipation of locating communities where we will be able to use our redevelopment and operating expertise to generate high returns. However, the level of development and acquisition volume, or disposition activity, will be heavily influenced by capital and real estate market conditions, as well as apartment community demand.

Our real estate investments consist primarily of current operating apartment communities, communities in various stages of development (“Development Communities”) and Development Rights as defined below. Our current operating communities are further distinguished as Established Communities, Other Stabilized Communities, Lease-Up Communities and Redevelopment Communities. The following is a description of each category:

22

A more detailed description of our reportable segments and other related operating information can be found in Note 8, “Segment Reporting,” of our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. Although each of these categories is important to our business, we generally evaluate overall operating, industry and market trends based on the operating results of our Established Communities, for which a detailed discussion can be found in “Results of Operations” as part of our discussion of overall operating results. We evaluate our current and future cash needs and future operating potential based on acquisition, disposition, development, redevelopment and financing activities within Other Stabilized, Redevelopment and Development Communities, for which detailed discussions can be found in “Liquidity and Capital Resources.”

23

On June 30, 2004, we owned or had an ownership interest in these categories as follows:

In July 2004 we acquired one community containing 204 apartment homes. As of July 30, 2004 our 134 current communities consisted of 38,731 apartment homes. Of those communities, we owned:

We also hold a fee simple ownership interest in twelve of the Development Communities, two of which will be subject to joint venture ownership structures upon construction completion, in addition to a membership interest in a limited liability company that owns one Development Community subject to a land lease and a general partnership interest in a partnership structured as a “DownREIT” that owns one Development Community.

24

In each of our six partnerships structured as DownREITs, either AvalonBay or one of our wholly-owned subsidiaries is the general partner, and there are one or more limited partners whose interest in the partnership is represented by units of limited partnership interest. For each DownREIT partnership, limited partners are entitled to receive an initial distribution before any distribution is made to the general partner. Although the partnership agreements for each of the DownREITs are different, generally the distributions per unit paid to the holders of units of limited partnership interests have approximated our current common stock dividend amount. Each DownREIT partnership has been structured so that it is unlikely the limited partners will be entitled to a distribution greater than the initial distribution provided for in the applicable partnership agreement. The holders of units of limited partnership interest have the right to present each unit of limited partnership interest for redemption for cash equal to the fair market value of a share of our common stock on the date of redemption. In lieu of a cash redemption by the partnership, we may elect to acquire any unit presented for redemption for one share of our common stock or for such cash amount. As of July 30, 2004, there were 573,360 DownREIT partnership units outstanding. The DownREIT partnerships are consolidated for financial reporting purposes.

We elected to be taxed as a REIT for federal income tax purposes for the year ended December 31, 1994 and we have not revoked that election. We were incorporated under the laws of the State of California in 1978, and we were reincorporated in the State of Maryland in July 1995. Our principal executive offices are located at 2900 Eisenhower Avenue, Suite 300, Alexandria, Virginia, 22314, and our telephone number at that location is (703) 329-6300. We also maintain regional offices and administrative or specialty offices in or near the following cities:

Recent Developments

Development Activities. During the three months ended June 30, 2004, we commenced development of three communities, Avalon at Juanita Village, located in Seattle, Washington, and Avalon Del Rey and Avalon Camarillo, both located in the Los Angeles, California area. These communities, when completed are expected to contain an aggregate of 769 apartment homes for a total capitalized cost of $158,200,000. Both Avalon at Juanita Village and Avalon Del Rey will be subject to joint venture ownership structures upon construction completion, as further described in “Liquidity and Capital Resources” located elsewhere in this report.

The development and redevelopment of communities involves risks that the investment will fail to perform in accordance with our expectations. See “Risks of Development and Redevelopment” for our discussion of these and other risks inherent in developing or redeveloping communities.

Acquisition Activities. During the three months ended June 30, 2004, we acquired one community, Avalon at Redondo Beach, located in Los Angeles, California. This garden-style community contains 105 apartment homes and was acquired for an acquisition price of $24,065,000.

Disposition Activities. During the three months ended June 30, 2004, we sold two communities, Avalon Greenbriar, located in Seattle, Washington, and Avalon at Laguna Niguel, located in Orange County, California. These two communities, which contained a total of 597 apartment homes, were sold for an aggregate sales price of $61,100,000, including the transfer of $18,755,000 of variable rate, tax-exempt debt, for net proceeds of $40,909,000. In addition, variable rate, tax-exempt debt of $10,400,000 was repaid immediately prior to the sale of one of these communities.

25

Critical Accounting Policies

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) requires management to use judgment in the application of accounting policies, including making estimates and assumptions. If our judgment or interpretation of the facts and circumstances relating to various transactions had been different, or different estimates or assumptions would have been made, it is possible that different accounting policies would have been applied, resulting in different financial results or a different presentation of our financial statements. Below is a discussion of accounting policies that we consider critical, in that they may require complex judgment in their application or require estimates about matters which are inherently uncertain, and are critical to an understanding of our financial condition and operating results. As a REIT that owns, operates and develops apartment communities, our critical accounting policies relate to revenue recognition, cost capitalization, asset impairment evaluation and REIT status. A discussion of all of our accounting policies, including further discussion of the critical accounting policies described below, can be found in Note 1, “Organization and Significant Accounting Policies” of our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Revenue Recognition

Rental income related to leases is recognized on an accrual basis when due from residents in accordance with SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104, “Revenue Recognition” and Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 13, “Accounting for Leases.” In accordance with our standard lease terms, rental payments are generally due on a monthly basis. Any cash concessions given at the inception of the lease are amortized over the approximate life of the lease – generally one year. A discussion regarding the impact of cash concessions on rental revenue for Established Communities can be found in “Results of Operations.”

Cost Capitalization

We capitalize costs during the development of assets (including interest and related loan fees, property taxes and other direct and indirect costs) beginning when active development commences until the asset, or a portion of the asset, is delivered and is ready for its intended use, which is generally indicated by the issuance of a certificate of occupancy. We capitalize costs during redevelopment of apartment homes (including interest and related loan fees, property taxes and other direct and indirect costs) beginning when an apartment home is taken out-of-service for redevelopment until the apartment home redevelopment is completed and the apartment home is available for a new resident.

We capitalize pre-development costs incurred in pursuit of Development Rights for which we currently believe future development is probable. These costs include legal fees, design fees and related overhead costs. Future development of these Development Rights is dependent upon various factors, including zoning and regulatory approval, rental market conditions, construction costs and availability of capital. Pre-development costs incurred in the pursuit of Development Rights for which future development is not yet considered probable are expensed as incurred. In addition, if the status of a Development Right changes, deeming future development no longer probable, any capitalized pre-development costs are written-off with a charge to expense.

We generally capitalize only non-recurring expenditures. We capitalize improvements and upgrades only if the item: (i) exceeds $15,000; (ii) extends the useful life of the asset; and (iii) is not related to making an apartment home ready for the next resident. Under this policy, virtually all capitalized costs are non-recurring, as recurring make-ready costs are expensed as incurred. Recurring make-ready costs include: (i) carpet and appliance replacements; (ii) floor coverings; (iii) interior painting; and (iv) other redecorating costs. Because we expense carpet replacements, our expense levels and volatility are greatest in the third quarter of each year as this is when we experience our greatest amount of turnover. We capitalize purchases of personal property, such as computers and furniture, only if the item is a new addition and the

26

item exceeds $2,500. We generally expense replacements of personal property. For Established and Other Stabilized Communities, we recorded non-revenue generating capital expenditures of $160 per apartment home in the six months ended June 30, 2004 and $140 per apartment home in the six months ended June 30, 2003. The average maintenance costs charged to expense per apartment home, including carpet and appliance replacements, related to these communities was $667 in the six months ended June 30, 2004 and $605 in the six months ended June 30, 2003. We anticipate that capitalized costs and expensed maintenance costs per apartment home will gradually increase as the average age of our communities increases, and expensed maintenance costs will fluctuate with turnover.

Asset Impairment Evaluation

If there is an event or change in circumstance that indicates an impairment in the value of a community, our policy is to assess the impairment by making a comparison of the current and projected operating cash flows of the community over its remaining useful life, on an undiscounted basis, to the carrying amount of the community. If the carrying amount is in excess of the estimated projected operating cash flows of the community, we would recognize an impairment loss equivalent to an amount required to adjust the carrying amount to its estimated fair market value. Real estate assets held for sale are measured at the lower of the carrying amount or the fair value less the cost to sell.

We account for our investments in technology companies in accordance with Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion No. 18, “The Equity Method of Accounting for Investments in Common Stock.” If there is an event or change in circumstance that indicates a loss in the value of an investment, we record the loss and reduce the value of the investment to its fair value. Due to the nature of these investments, an impairment in value can be difficult to determine.

REIT Status

A corporate REIT is a legal entity which holds real estate interests and must meet a number of organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement that it currently distribute at least 90% of its adjusted taxable income to stockholders. As a REIT, we generally will not be subject to corporate level federal income tax on taxable income we distribute currently to our stockholders. If we fail to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, we will be subject to federal income taxes at regular corporate rates (including any applicable alternative minimum tax) and may not be able to qualify as a REIT for four subsequent taxable years.

27

Results of Operations

Our year-over-year operating performance is primarily affected by changes in net operating income of our current operating apartment communities due to market conditions, net operating income derived from acquisitions and development completions, the loss of net operating income related to disposed communities and capital market, disposition and financing activity. A comparison of our operating results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 follows (dollars in thousands):