Form: 10-Q

Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)

August 8, 2005

 

 
 
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005
Commission file number 1-12672
AVALONBAY COMMUNITIES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
 
     
Maryland
  77-0404318
(State or other jurisdiction of
  (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)
  Identification No.)
2900 Eisenhower Avenue, Suite 300
Alexandria, Virginia 22314
(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)
(703) 329-6300
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
(Former name, if changed since last report)

 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding twelve (12) months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past ninety (90) days.
Yes þ           Noo
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).
Yes þ           Noo
APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock as of the latest practicable date:
73,488,179 shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, were outstanding as of July 29, 2005
 
 

 


 

AVALONBAY COMMUNITIES, INC.

FORM 10-Q
INDEX
PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION
     
    Page
Item 1. Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
   
 
   
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2005 (unaudited) and December 31, 2004
  1
 
   
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Other Comprehensive Income (unaudited) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004
  2
 
   
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited) for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004
  3-4
 
   
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
  5-20
 
   
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
  21-48
 
   
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
  49
 
   
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
  49
 
   
PART II — OTHER INFORMATION
   
 
   
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
  49
 
   
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
  50
 
   
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
  50
 
   
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
  50
 
   
Item 5. Other Information
  51
 
   
Item 6. Exhibits
  51-52
 
   
Signatures
  53

 


 

AVALONBAY COMMUNITIES, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
                 
    6-30-05   12-31-04
    (unaudited)        
ASSETS
               
Real estate:
               
Land
  $ 877,785     $ 885,118  
Buildings and improvements
    4,379,731       4,259,000  
Furniture, fixtures and equipment
    134,694       131,943  
 
               
 
    5,392,210       5,276,061  
Less accumulated depreciation
    (895,435 )     (803,850 )
 
               
Net operating real estate
    4,496,775       4,472,211  
Construction in progress, including land
    196,833       173,291  
Land held for development
    211,119       166,751  
Operating real estate assets held for sale, net
    10,428       65,572  
 
               
Total real estate, net
    4,915,155       4,877,825  
 
               
Cash and cash equivalents
    2,877       1,526  
Cash in escrow
    14,545       13,075  
Resident security deposits
    27,493       23,478  
Investments in unconsolidated real estate entities
    41,672       41,379  
Deferred financing costs, net
    20,024       21,859  
Deferred development costs
    38,777       37,007  
Prepaid expenses and other assets
    54,163       52,132  
 
               
Total assets
  $ 5,114,706     $ 5,068,281  
 
               
 
               
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
               
Unsecured notes
  $ 1,809,150     $ 1,859,448  
Variable rate unsecured credit facility
    156,000       102,000  
Mortgage notes payable
    474,099       480,843  
Dividends payable
    54,204       52,982  
Payables for construction
    20,311       23,005  
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
    76,366       70,410  
Accrued interest payable
    34,266       37,254  
Resident security deposits
    37,362       34,516  
Liabilities related to real estate assets held for sale
    284       1,007  
 
               
Total liabilities
    2,662,042       2,661,465  
 
               
 
               
Minority interest of unitholders in consolidated partnerships
    20,221       21,525  
 
               
Commitments and contingencies
               
 
               
Stockholders’ equity:
               
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; $25 liquidation preference; 50,000,000 shares authorized at both June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004; 4,000,000 shares issued and outstanding at both June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004
    40       40  
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 140,000,000 shares authorized at both June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004; 73,280,345 and 72,582,076 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively
    733       726  
Additional paid-in capital
    2,426,232       2,389,511  
Deferred compensation
    (17,219 )     (8,659 )
Dividends less than accumulated earnings
    28,807       10,769  
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
    (6,150 )     (7,096 )
 
               
Total stockholders’ equity
    2,432,443       2,385,291  
 
               
 
               
 
               
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
  $ 5,114,706     $ 5,068,281  
 
               
See accompanying notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

1


 

AVALONBAY COMMUNITIES, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
AND OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
                                 
    For the three months ended   For the six months ended
    6-30-05   6-30-04   6-30-05   6-30-04
Revenue:
                               
Rental and other income
  $ 170,514     $ 157,257     $ 337,520     $ 309,318  
Management, development and other fees
    1,363       157       1,796       305  
 
                               
Total revenue
    171,877       157,414       339,316       309,623  
 
                               
 
                               
Expenses:
                               
Operating expenses, excluding property taxes
    47,519       46,458       93,753       90,732  
Property taxes
    16,772       14,762       33,461       29,991  
Interest expense
    32,379       32,416       64,533       64,610  
Depreciation expense
    40,202       38,949       81,168       77,295  
General and administrative expense
    6,262       4,486       13,421       9,200  
 
                               
Total expenses
    143,134       137,071       286,336       271,828  
 
                               
 
                               
Equity in income of unconsolidated entities
    178       276       6,761       463  
Interest income
    270       36       301       56  
Venture partner interest in profit-sharing
    —       (352 )     —       (677 )
Minority interest in consolidated partnerships
    (337 )     (408 )     (851 )     (250 )
 
                               
 
Income from continuing operations before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle
    28,854       19,895       59,191       37,387  
 
                               
 
                               
Discontinued operations:
                               
Income from discontinued operations
    793       2,764       2,452       6,002  
Gain on sale of real estate assets
    27,264       12,375       64,878       12,375  
 
                               
Total discontinued operations
    28,057       15,139       67,330       18,377  
 
                               
 
                               
Income before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle
    56,911       35,034       126,521       55,764  
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle
    —       —       —       4,547  
 
                               
 
Net income
    56,911       35,034       126,521       60,311  
Dividends attributable to preferred stock
    (2,175 )     (2,175 )     (4,350 )     (4,350 )
 
                               
 
                               
Net income available to common stockholders
  $ 54,736     $ 32,859     $ 122,171     $ 55,961  
 
                               
 
                               
Other comprehensive income (loss):
                               
Unrealized gain (loss) on cash flow hedges
    (354 )     1,307       946       935  
 
                               
Comprehensive income
  $ 54,382     $ 34,166     $ 123,117     $ 56,896  
 
                               
 
                               
Dividends declared per common share
  $ 0.71     $ 0.70     $ 1.42     $ 1.40  
 
                               
Earnings per common share — basic:
                               
Income from continuing operations (net of dividends attributable to preferred stock)
  $ 0.36     $ 0.25     $ 0.75     $ 0.53  
Discontinued operations
    0.39       0.21       0.93       0.26  
 
                               
 
Net income available to common stockholders
  $ 0.75     $ 0.46     $ 1.68     $ 0.79  
 
                               
 
                               
Earnings per common share — diluted:
                               
Income from continuing operations (net of dividends attributable to preferred stock)
  $ 0.36     $ 0.25     $ 0.75     $ 0.53  
Discontinued operations
    0.38       0.21       0.90       0.26  
 
                               
 
Net income available to common stockholders
  $ 0.74     $ 0.46     $ 1.65     $ 0.79  
 
                               
See accompanying notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

2


 

AVALONBAY COMMUNITIES, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands)
                 
    For the six months ended
    6-30-05   6-30-04
Cash flows from operating activities:
               
Net income
  $ 126,521     $ 60,311  
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash provided by operating activities:
               
Depreciation expense
    81,168       77,295  
Depreciation expense from discontinued operations
    140       2,575  
Amortization of deferred financing costs and debt premium/discount
    1,944       2,094  
Amortization of deferred compensation
    4,503       2,324  
Income allocated to minority interest in consolidated partnerships including discontinued operations
    851       275  
Income allocated to venture partner interest in profit-sharing
    —       677  
Gain on sale of real estate assets
    (64,878 )     (12,375 )
Gain on sale of technology investment
    (6,252 )     —  
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle
    —       (4,547 )
Increase in cash in operating escrows
    (2,033 )     (1,338 )
Decrease (increase) in resident security deposits, prepaid expenses and other assets
    (1,845 )     6,666  
Increase in accrued expenses, other liabilities and accrued interest payable
    4,650       1,952  
 
               
Net cash provided by operating activities
    144,769       135,909  
 
               
 
               
Cash flows from investing activities:
               
Development/redevelopment of real estate assets including land acquisitions and deferred development costs
    (187,465 )     (173,918 )
Acquisition of real estate assets, including partner equity interest
    (57,415 )     (24,065 )
Capital expenditures — existing real estate assets
    (7,960 )     (6,127 )
Capital expenditures — non-real estate assets
    (946 )     (366 )
Proceeds from sale of communities and technology investment, including reimbursement for fund communities, net of selling costs
    232,291       40,909  
Decrease in payables for construction
    (2,694 )     (365 )
Decrease in cash in construction escrows
    563       895  
Decrease (increase) in investments in unconsolidated real estate entities
    (13,074 )     613  
 
               
Net cash used in investing activities
    (36,700 )     (162,424 )
 
               
 
               
Cash flows from financing activities:
               
Issuance of common stock
    21,251       28,598  
Dividends paid
    (106,854 )     (104,033 )
Net borrowings under unsecured credit facility
    54,000       77,800  
Issuance of mortgage notes payable and draws on construction loans
    16,596       42,800  
Repayments of mortgage notes payable
    (39,679 )     (37,000 )
Issuance (repayment) of unsecured notes
    (50,000 )     25,000  
Payment of deferred financing costs
    (1,304 )     (8,752 )
Redemption of units for cash by minority partners
    (50 )     (163 )
Distributions to DownREIT partnership unitholders
    (611 )     (741 )
Distributions to joint venture and profit-sharing partners
    (67 )     (1,658 )
 
               
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
    (106,718 )     21,851  
 
               
 
               
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
    1,351       (4,664 )
 
               
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
    1,526       7,165  
 
               
 
               
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
  $ 2,877     $ 2,501  
 
               
 
               
Cash paid during period for interest, net of amount capitalized
  $ 63,317     $ 62,579  
 
               
See accompanying notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

3


 

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (continued)
Supplemental disclosures of non-cash investing and financing activities (dollars in thousands):
During the six months ended June 30, 2005:
  •   As described in Note 4, “Stockholders’ Equity,” 163,792 shares of common stock were issued in connection with stock grants, 738 shares were issued through the Company’s dividend reinvestment plan, 45,243 shares were withheld to satisfy employees’ tax withholding and other liabilities and 3,925 shares were forfeited, for a net value of $9,076. In addition, the Company granted 720,059 options for common stock at a value of $4,600.
 
  •   33,102 units of limited partnership, valued at $1,445, were presented for redemption to the DownREIT partnerships that issued such units and were acquired by the Company in exchange for an equal number of shares of the Company’s common stock.
 
  •   The Company deconsolidated mortgage notes payable in the aggregate amount of $24,869 upon admittance of outside investors into a previously consolidated discretionary investment fund. See Note 6, “Investments in Unconsolidated Entities.”
 
  •   The Company assumed fixed rate debt of $4,566 in connection with the acquisition of an improved land parcel.
 
  •   The Company recorded a decrease to other liabilities and a corresponding gain to other comprehensive income of $946 to adjust the Company’s Hedged Derivatives (as defined in Note 5, “Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities”) to their fair value.
 
  •   Common and preferred dividends declared but not paid totaled $54,204.
During the six months ended June 30, 2004:
  •   147,517 shares of common stock were issued in connection with stock grants, 35,215 shares were issued in connection with non-cash stock option exercises, 49,583 shares were withheld to satisfy employees’ tax withholding and other liabilities and 72 shares were forfeited, for a net value of $6,170.
 
  •   49,391 units of limited partnership, valued at $1,852, were presented for redemption to the DownREIT partnerships that issued such units and were acquired by the Company in exchange for an equal number of shares of the Company’s common stock.
 
  •   The Company sold one community with a mortgage note payable of $18,755 that was assumed by the buyer as part of the total sales price.
 
  •   The Company assumed fixed rate debt of $13,322 in connection with the acquisition of two improved land parcels.
 
  •   The Company recorded a decrease to other liabilities and a corresponding gain to other comprehensive income of $935 to adjust the Company’s Hedged Derivatives to their fair value.
 
  •   Common and preferred dividends declared but not paid totaled $52,491.

4


 

AVALONBAY COMMUNITIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
1. Organization and Significant Accounting Policies
Organization
AvalonBay Communities, Inc. (the “Company,” which term, unless the context otherwise requires, refers to AvalonBay Communities, Inc. together with its subsidiaries) is a Maryland corporation that has elected to be taxed as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. The Company focuses on the ownership and operation of apartment communities in high barrier-to-entry markets of the United States. These markets are located in the Northeast, Mid-Atlantic, Midwest, Pacific Northwest, and Northern and Southern California regions of the country.
At June 30, 2005, the Company owned or held a direct or indirect ownership interest in 139 operating apartment communities containing 40,478 apartment homes in ten states and the District of Columbia, of which four communities containing 1,491 apartment homes were under reconstruction. In addition, the Company owned or held a direct or indirect ownership interest in 11 communities under construction that are expected to contain an aggregate of 2,593 apartment homes when completed. The Company also owned or held a direct or indirect ownership interest in rights to develop an additional 46 communities that, if developed in the manner expected, will contain an estimated 12,216 apartment homes.
During the three months ended June 30, 2005:
  •   The Company sold one community, Avalon Lake, located in the Fairfield-New Haven, Connecticut area. This community, which contained 135 apartment homes, was sold for a sales price of $37,700. The sale of this community resulted in a gain calculated in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) of $22,647.
 
  •   The Company completed the development of two communities, Avalon Run East II, located in Central New Jersey and Avalon Orange, located in the Fairfield-New Haven, Connecticut area. These garden-style communities contain an aggregate of 480 apartment homes and were completed for a total capitalized cost of $74,300.
 
  •   The Company completed the redevelopment of one community, Avalon Towers, located in the Long Island, New York area. This high-rise community contains 109 apartment homes and was completed for a total capitalized cost of $21,200, of which $17,300 was incurred prior to redevelopment.
 
  •   The Company commenced construction of two communities. Avalon Pines II, located in the Long Island, New York area, is expected to contain 152 apartment homes when completed, for a total capitalized cost of $26,600. Avalon Chestnut Hill, located in the greater Boston, Massachusetts area, is expected to contain 204 apartment homes when completed, for a total capitalized cost of $60,600.
 
  •   The Company acquired five parcels of land to hold for future development, for an aggregate purchase price of $45,534. These parcels of land, if developed as expected, will contain 1,154 apartment homes for a total capitalized cost of $297,000.
 
  •   The Company sold two land parcels, one located in Seattle, Washington and one located in the Oakland-East Bay area, for an aggregate sales price of $23,000 which resulted in a gain calculated in accordance with GAAP of $4,617.
The interim unaudited financial statements have been prepared in accordance with GAAP for interim financial information and in conjunction with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements required by GAAP have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. These unaudited financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 and the Company’s quarterly reports on Form 10-Q for subsequent quarters. The results of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2005 are not necessarily indicative of the operating results for the full year. Management believes the disclosures are adequate to ensure the information presented is not misleading. In the opinion of management, all adjustments and eliminations, consisting only of normal, recurring adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the financial statements for the interim periods, have been included.

5


 

Principles of Consolidation
The Company assesses consolidation of variable interest entities under the guidance of FASB Interpretation No. 46 (“FIN 46”), “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, an Interpretation of ARB No. 51,” as revised in December 2003. The Company accounts for joint venture partnerships and subsidiary partnerships structured as DownREITs that are not variable interest entities in accordance with Statement of Position (“SOP”) 78-9, “Accounting for Investments in Real Estate Ventures.” Under SOP 78-9, the Company consolidates joint venture and DownREIT partnerships when the Company controls the major operating and financial policies of the partnership through majority ownership or in its capacity as general partner. The accompanying Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned partnerships, certain joint venture partnerships, subsidiary partnerships structured as DownREITs and any variable interest entities consolidated under FIN 46. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
In each of the partnerships structured as DownREITs, either the Company or one of the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiaries is the general partner, and there are one or more limited partners whose interest in the partnership is represented by units of limited partnership interest. For each DownREIT partnership, limited partners are entitled to receive an initial distribution before any distribution is made to the general partner. Although the partnership agreements for each of the DownREITs are different, generally the distributions per unit paid to the holders of units of limited partnership interests have approximated the Company’s current common stock dividend per share. Each DownREIT partnership has been structured so that it is unlikely the limited partners will be entitled to a distribution greater than the initial distribution provided for in the partnership agreement. The holders of units of limited partnership interest have the right to present all or some of their units for redemption for a cash amount as determined by the applicable partnership agreement and based on the fair value of the Company’s common stock. In lieu of a cash redemption, the Company may elect to acquire such units for an equal number of shares of the Company’s common stock.
The Company accounts for investments in unconsolidated entities that are not variable interest entities in accordance with SOP 78-9 and Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion No. 18, “The Equity Method of Accounting for Investments in Common Stock.” The Company uses the equity method to account for investments in which it owns greater than 20% of the equity value or has significant and disproportionate influence over that entity. Investments in which the Company owns 20% or less of the equity value and does not have significant and disproportionate influence are accounted for using the cost method. If there is an event or change in circumstance that indicates a loss in the value of an investment, the Company’s policy is to record the loss and reduce the value of the investment to its fair value. A loss in value would be indicated if the Company could not recover the carrying value of the investment or if the investee could not sustain an earnings capacity that would justify the carrying amount of the investment.
Revenue Recognition
Rental income related to leases is recognized on an accrual basis when due from residents in accordance with SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104, “Revenue Recognition” and Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 13, “Accounting for Leases.” In accordance with the Company’s standard lease terms, rental payments are generally due on a monthly basis. Any cash concessions given at the inception of the lease are amortized over the approximate life of the lease, which is generally one year.
Real Estate
Significant expenditures which improve or extend the life of an asset are capitalized. The operating real estate assets are stated at cost and consist of land, buildings and improvements, furniture, fixtures and equipment, and other costs incurred during their development, redevelopment and acquisition. Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged to operations as incurred.

6


 

The Company’s policy with respect to capital expenditures is generally to capitalize only non-recurring expenditures. Improvements and upgrades are capitalized only if the item exceeds $15, extends the useful life of the asset and is not related to making an apartment home ready for the next resident. Purchases of personal property, such as computers and furniture, are capitalized only if the item is a new addition and exceeds $2.5. The Company generally expenses purchases of personal property made for replacement purposes.
The capitalization of costs during the development of assets (including interest and related loan fees, property taxes and other direct and indirect costs) begins when active development commences and ends when the asset, or a portion of an asset, is delivered and is ready for its intended use, which is generally indicated by the issuance of a certificate of occupancy. Cost capitalization during redevelopment of apartment homes (including interest and related loan fees, property taxes and other direct and indirect costs) begins when an apartment home is taken out-of-service for redevelopment and ends when the apartment home redevelopment is completed and the apartment home is available for a new resident. Rental income and operating costs incurred during the initial lease-up or post-redevelopment lease-up period are fully recognized as they accrue.
In accordance with SFAS No. 67, “Accounting for Costs and Initial Rental Operations of Real Estate Projects,” the Company capitalizes pre-development costs incurred in pursuit of new development opportunities for which the Company currently believes future development is probable (“Development Rights”). Future development of these Development Rights is dependent upon various factors, including zoning and regulatory approval, rental market conditions, construction costs and availability of capital. Pre-development costs incurred in the pursuit of Development Rights for which future development is not yet considered probable are expensed as incurred. In addition, if the status of a Development Right changes, deeming future development no longer probable, any capitalized pre-development costs are written-off with a charge to expense. The Company expensed costs related to abandoned pursuits, which includes the abandonment or impairment of Development Rights, acquisition pursuits and technology investments, in the amounts of $146 and $936 for the three months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively, and $366 and $1,177 for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
The Company owns land improved with office buildings and industrial space occupied by unrelated third-parties in connection with five Development Rights. The Company intends to manage the current improvements until such time as all tenant obligations have been satisfied or eliminated through negotiation, and construction of new apartment communities is ready to begin. As provided under the guidance of SFAS No. 67, the revenue from incidental operations received from the current improvements in excess of any incremental costs are being recorded as a reduction of total capitalized costs of the Development Right and not as part of net income.
In connection with the acquisition of an operating community, the Company performs a valuation and allocation to each asset and liability acquired in such transaction, based on their estimated fair values at the date of acquisition in accordance with SFAS No. 141, “Business Combinations.” The purchase price allocations to tangible assets, such as land, buildings and improvements, and furniture, fixtures and equipment, are reflected in real estate assets and depreciated over their estimated useful lives. Any purchase price allocation to intangible assets, such as in-place leases, is included in prepaid expenses and other assets and amortized over the average remaining lease term of the acquired leases. The fair value of acquired in-place leases is determined based on the estimated cost to replace such leases, including foregone rents during an assumed re-lease period, as well as the impact on projected cash flow of acquired leases with leased rents above or below current market rents.
Depreciation is calculated on buildings and improvements using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives, which range from seven to thirty years. Furniture, fixtures and equipment are generally depreciated using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives, which range from three years (primarily computer-related equipment) to seven years.
If there is an event or change in circumstance that indicates an impairment in the value of an operating community, the Company’s policy is to assess any impairment in value by making a comparison of the current and projected operating cash flow of the community over its remaining useful life, on an undiscounted basis, to the carrying amount of the community. If the carrying amount is in excess of the estimated projected operating cash flow of the community, the Company would recognize an impairment loss equivalent to an amount required to adjust the carrying amount to its estimated fair market value.

7


 

Deferred Financing Costs
Deferred financing costs include fees and costs incurred to obtain debt financing and are amortized on a straight-line basis, which approximates the effective interest method, over the shorter of the term of the loan or the related credit enhancement facility, if applicable. Unamortized financing costs are written-off when debt is retired before the maturity date. Accumulated amortization of deferred financing costs was $14,012 at June 30, 2005 and $12,966 at December 31, 2004.
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Cash in Escrow
Cash and cash equivalents include all cash and liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less from the date acquired. The majority of the Company’s cash, cash equivalents and cash in escrows is held at major commercial banks.
Interest Rate Contracts
The Company utilizes derivative financial instruments to manage interest rate risk and has designated these financial instruments as hedges under the guidance of SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,” and SFAS No. 138, “Accounting for Certain Instruments and Certain Hedging Activities, an Amendment of Statement No. 133.” For fair value hedge transactions, changes in the fair value of the derivative instrument and changes in the fair value of the hedged item due to the risk being hedged are recognized in current period earnings. For cash flow hedge transactions, changes in the fair value of the derivative instrument are reported in other comprehensive income. For cash flow hedges where the changes in the fair value of the derivative exceed the change in fair value of the hedged item, the ineffective portion is recognized in current period earnings. Derivatives which are not part of a hedge relationship are recorded at fair value through earnings. As of June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, the Company had approximately $234,000 and $236,000, respectively, in variable rate debt subject to cash flow hedges. See Note 5, “Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.”
Comprehensive Income
Comprehensive income, as reflected on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Other Comprehensive Income, is defined as all changes in equity during each period except for those resulting from investments by or distributions to shareholders. Accumulated other comprehensive loss as reflected in Note 4, “Stockholders’ Equity,” reflects the changes in the fair value of effective cash flow hedges.

8


 

Earnings per Common Share
In accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 128, “Earnings per Share,” basic earnings per share is computed by dividing earnings available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period. Other potentially dilutive common shares, and the related impact to earnings, are considered when calculating earnings per share on a diluted basis. The Company’s earnings per common share are determined as follows:
                                 
    For the three months ended   For the six months ended
    6-30-05   6-30-04   6-30-05   6-30-04
Basic and diluted shares outstanding
                               
                                 
Weighted average common shares — basic
    72,786,719       71,409,668       72,640,134       71,164,908  
Weighted average DownREIT units outstanding
    477,970       581,941       487,913       594,850  
Effect of dilutive securities
    1,324,547       1,045,875       1,289,458       1,031,712  
 
                               
Weighted average common shares — diluted
    74,589,236       73,037,484       74,417,505       72,791,470  
 
                               
                                 
Calculation of Earnings per Share — basic
                               
                                 
Net income available to common stockholders
  $ 54,736     $ 32,859     $ 122,171     $ 55,961  
 
                               
Weighted average common shares — basic
    72,786,719       71,409,668       72,640,134       71,164,908  
 
                               
Earnings per common share — basic
  $ 0.75     $ 0.46     $ 1.68     $ 0.79  
 
                               
                                 
Calculation of Earnings per Share — diluted
                               
                                 
Net income available to common stockholders
  $ 54,736     $ 32,859     $ 122,171     $ 55,961  
Add: Minority interest of DownREIT unitholders in consolidated partnerships, including discontinued operations
    303       912       780       1,239  
 
                               
Adjusted net income available to common stockholders
  $ 55,039     $ 33,771     $ 122,951     $ 57,200  
 
                               
Weighted average common shares — diluted
    74,589,236       73,037,484       74,417,505       72,791,470  
 
                               
Earnings per common share — diluted
  $ 0.74     $ 0.46     $ 1.65     $ 0.79  
 
                               
Certain employee options to purchase shares of common stock of 0 and 16,267 were outstanding during the three and six months ended June 30, 2005, respectively, and 3,000 were outstanding during both the three and six months ended June 30, 2004, but were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because the options’ exercise prices were greater than the average market price of the common shares for the period and therefore, are anti-dilutive.
Stock-Based Compensation
Effective January 1, 2003, the Company adopted the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” as amended by SFAS No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation – Transition and Disclosure – an amendment of FASB Statement No. 123,” prospectively to all employee awards granted, modified, or settled on or after January 1, 2003. Awards under the Company’s stock option plans vest over periods ranging from one to three years. Therefore, the cost related to stock-based employee compensation for employee stock options included in the determination of net income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, is less than that which would have been recognized if the fair value based method had been applied to all awards since the original effective date of SFAS No. 123. The Company will adopt the provisions of SFAS 123(R), “Share Based Payment,” on January 1, 2006. The Company is currently assessing the expected impact of the adoption of SFAS 123(R) on its financial position and results of operations.

9


 

The following table illustrates the effect on net income available to common stockholders and earnings per share if the fair value based method had been applied to all outstanding and unvested awards in each period based on the fair market value as determined on the date of grant:
                                 
    For the three months ended   For the six months ended
    6-30-05   6-30-04   6-30-05   6-30-04
Net income available to common stockholders, as reported
  $ 54,736     $ 32,859     $ 122,171     $ 55,961  
Add: Actual compensation expense recorded under fair value based method, net of related tax effects
    564       222       1,038       389  
Deduct: Total compensation expense determined under fair value based method, net of related tax effects
    (568 )     (433 )     (1,142 )     (736 )
 
                               
Pro forma net income available to common stockholders
  $ 54,732     $ 32,648     $ 122,067     $ 55,614  
 
                               
 
                               
Earnings per share:
                               
 
                               
Basic — as reported
  $ 0.75     $ 0.46     $ 1.68     $ 0.79  
 
                               
Basic — pro forma
  $ 0.75     $ 0.46     $ 1.68     $ 0.78  
 
                               
Diluted — as reported
  $ 0.74     $ 0.46     $ 1.65     $ 0.79  
 
                               
Diluted — pro forma
  $ 0.74     $ 0.46     $ 1.65     $ 0.78  
 
                               
Legal Contingencies
The Company is subject to various legal proceedings and claims that arise in the ordinary course of business. These matters are frequently covered by insurance. If it has been determined that a loss is probable to occur, the estimated amount of the loss is expensed in the financial statements. While the resolution of these matters cannot be predicted with certainty, management believes the final outcome of such matters will not have a material adverse effect on the financial position or results of operations of the Company.
The Company is currently involved in construction litigation with a general contractor and a surety bond provider related to a community that has since completed development. A non-jury trial ended in April 2004, and in May 2004, the court issued a ruling, finding that these parties were liable to the Company for consequential damages due to breach of contract and other failures to perform. The court issued a ruling in October 2004, awarding the Company approximately $1,250 plus interest. However, the Company has determined that it will file an appeal to seek an increase in the damage award. There is no guarantee that a higher, or any, damage award, will be received by the Company after all appeals are filed and a final ruling is provided.
The Company is currently involved in a lawsuit regarding the handling of security deposits in California. The lawsuit in essence alleges that the amounts withheld by the Company from security deposits at the end of tenancies exceeded the Company’s actual damages. The plaintiff in the lawsuit is seeking class action certification, but that has not yet been obtained.
During the three months ended June 30, 2005, the Company accrued $1,500 related to these and other various litigation matters.
Variable Interest Entities under FIN 46
The Company adopted the final provisions of FIN 46 as of January 1, 2004, which resulted in the consolidation of one entity during 2004 from which the Company held a participating mortgage note. As a result, the Company recognized a cumulative effect of change in accounting principle in January 2004 in the amount of $4,547, which increased earnings per common share – diluted by $0.06. The Company did not hold an equity interest in this entity, and therefore 100% of the entity’s net income or loss was recognized by the Company as minority interest in consolidated partnerships on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Other Comprehensive Income. In October 2004, the Company received payment in full of the outstanding mortgage note. Upon note repayment, the Company did not continue to hold a variable interest in this entity and therefore the Company discontinued consolidating the entity under the provisions of FIN 46.

10


 

Venture Partner Interest in Profit-Sharing
Prior to its expiration in December 2004, the Company had a repurchase option on its third-party partner’s 75% equity interest in a joint venture owning the Avalon on the Sound community. Due to the repurchase option, the Company accounted for its investment in this joint venture as a profit-sharing arrangement as required by SFAS No. 66, “Accounting for Sales of Real Estate.” As a result, the revenues and expenses, and assets and liabilities of Avalon on the Sound were included in the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for periods prior to December 31, 2004. The income allocated to the controlling partner is shown as venture partner interest in profit-sharing on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Other Comprehensive Income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004.
Discontinued Operations
On January 1, 2002, the Company adopted SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets” which requires that the assets and liabilities and the results of operations of any communities which have been sold since January 1, 2002, or otherwise qualify as held for sale, be presented as discontinued operations in the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in both current and prior periods presented. The community specific components of net income that are presented as discontinued operations include net operating income, depreciation expense, minority interest expense and interest expense. In addition, the net gain or loss (including any impairment loss) on the eventual disposal of communities held for sale will be presented as discontinued operations when recognized. A change in presentation for discontinued operations will not have any impact on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations. Real estate assets held for sale are measured at the lower of the carrying amount or the fair value less the cost to sell, and are presented separately in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. Subsequent to classification of a community as held for sale, no further depreciation is recorded.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
In June 2005, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) ratified the consensus in EITF Issue No. 04-5, “Determining Whether a General Partner, or the General Partners as a Group, Controls a Limited Partnership or Similar Entity When the Limited Partners Have Certain Rights,” which provides guidance in determining whether a general partner controls a limited partnership. EITF Issue No. 04-5 states that the general partner in a limited partnership is presumed to control that limited partnership. That presumption may be overcome if the limited partners have either (i) the substantive ability, either by a single limited partner or through a simple majority vote, to dissolve the limited partnership or otherwise remove the general partner without cause or (ii) substantive participating rights. The Company adopted EITF Issue No. 04-5 on June 29, 2005 for all new limited partnerships formed or existing limited partnerships that are modified after June 29, 2005 and will adopt EITF Issue No. 04-5 on January 1, 2006 for other existing limited partnerships. Although the Company is still assessing the impact of the adoption on January 1, 2006, the Company does not expect the final adoption of EITF Issue No. 04-5 to have a material effect on its financial position or results of operations.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP in the United States requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions. These estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Reclassifications
Certain reclassifications have been made to amounts in prior period’s financial statements to conform with current period presentations.

11


 

2. Interest Capitalized
Capitalized interest associated with communities under development or redevelopment totaled $6,036 and $5,010 for the three months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively, and $11,698 and $10,078 for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
3. Notes Payable, Unsecured Notes and Credit Facility
The Company’s mortgage notes payable, unsecured notes and variable rate unsecured credit facility as of June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004 are summarized as follows:
                 
    6-30-05   12-31-04
Fixed rate unsecured notes (1)
  $ 1,809,150     $ 1,859,448  
Fixed rate mortgage notes payable — conventional and tax-exempt
    241,213       263,669  
Variable rate mortgage notes payable — conventional and tax-exempt
    210,012       210,896  
 
               
Total notes payable and unsecured notes
    2,260,375       2,334,013  
Variable rate secured short-term debt
    22,874       6,278  
Variable rate unsecured credit facility
    156,000       102,000  
 
               
Total mortgage notes payable, unsecured notes and unsecured credit facility
  $ 2,439,249     $ 2,442,291  
 
               
(1)   Balances at June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004 include $850 and $552 of debt discount, respectively, from issuance of unsecured notes.
The following debt activity occurred during the six months ended June 30, 2005:
  •   The Company repaid $150,000 in previously issued unsecured notes in January 2005, along with any unpaid interest, pursuant to their scheduled maturity. No prepayment penalty was incurred;
 
  •   The Company issued $100,000 in unsecured notes in March 2005 under its existing shelf registration statement at an annual effective interest rate of 4.999%. Interest on these notes is payable semi-annually on March 15 and September 15, and they mature in March 2013;
 
  •   In connection with the admittance of outside investors into the Fund (as defined in Note 6, “Investments in Unconsolidated Entities”), the Company deconsolidated the assets and liabilities of four communities owned by the Fund including $24,869 in fixed rate mortgage debt secured by two of the communities;
 
  •   The Company made a payment in the amount of $36,142 to the third-party lender of a joint venture entity that was unconsolidated at December 31, 2004 but was consolidated in March 2005 upon acquisition of the 75% equity interest of the third-party partner (see Note 6, “Investments in Unconsolidated Entities”); and
 
  •   The Company assumed $4,566 in fixed rate debt in connection with the acquisition of a parcel of improved land.
In the aggregate, secured notes payable mature at various dates from September 2007 through April 2043 and are secured by certain apartment communities (with a net carrying value of $684,076 as of June 30, 2005). As of June 30, 2005, the Company has guaranteed approximately $129,000 of mortgage notes payable held by wholly-owned subsidiaries; all such mortgage notes payable are consolidated for financial reporting purposes. The weighted average interest rate of the Company’s fixed rate mortgage notes payable (conventional and tax-exempt) was 6.8% at June 30, 2005 and 6.7% at December 31, 2004. The weighted average interest rate of the Company’s variable rate mortgage notes payable and its unsecured credit facility (as discussed on the following page), including the effect of certain financing related fees, was 4.4% at June 30, 2005 and 3.9% at December 31, 2004.

12


 

Scheduled payments and maturities of mortgage notes payable and unsecured notes outstanding at June 30, 2005 are as follows:
                                     
                                Stated  
                        Unsecured   interest rate  
        Secured notes   Secured notes   notes   of unsecured  
  Year   payments   maturities   maturities   notes  
 
2005
    $ 4,514     $ —     $ —       —  
 
2006
      8,074       —       150,000       6.800 %
 
2007
      8,600       22,874       110,000
150,000
      6.875
5.000
%
%
 
2008
      9,149       4,356       50,000
150,000
      6.625
8.250
%
%
 
2009
      8,279       73,784       150,000       7.500 %
 
2010
      6,563       28,989       200,000       7.500 %
 
2011
      6,554       7,204       300,000
50,000
      6.625
6.625
%
%
 
2012
      6,207       12,096       250,000       6.125 %
 
2013
      6,339       —       100,000       4.950 %
 
2014
      6,784       —       150,000       5.375 %
 
Thereafter
      149,627       104,106       —       —  
 
 
                                 
 
 
    $ 220,690     $ 253,409     $ 1,810,000          
 
 
                                 
The Company’s unsecured notes contain a number of financial and other covenants with which the Company must comply, including, but not limited to, limits on the aggregate amount of total and secured indebtedness the Company may have on a consolidated basis and limits on the Company’s required debt service payments.
The Company has a $500,000 revolving variable rate unsecured credit facility with JPMorgan Chase Bank and Wachovia Bank, N.A. serving as banks and syndication agents for a syndicate of commercial banks. The Company had $156,000 outstanding under the facility and $28,468 in letters of credit on June 30, 2005 and $102,000 outstanding under the facility and $26,580 in letters of credit on December 31, 2004. Under the terms of the credit facility, if the Company elects to increase the facility by up to an additional $150,000, and one or more banks (from the syndicate or otherwise) voluntarily agree to provide the additional commitment, then the Company will be able to increase the facility up to $650,000, and no member of the syndicate of banks can prohibit such increase; such an increase in the facility will only be effective to the extent banks (from the syndicate or otherwise) choose to commit to lend additional funds. The Company pays participating banks, in the aggregate, an annual facility fee of approximately $750 in quarterly installments. The unsecured credit facility bears interest at varying levels based on the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”), rating levels achieved on the Company’s unsecured notes and on a maturity schedule selected by the Company. The current stated pricing is LIBOR plus 0.55% per annum (3.89% on June 30, 2005). The spread over LIBOR can vary from LIBOR plus 0.50% to LIBOR plus 1.15% based upon the rating of the Company’s long-term unsecured debt. In addition, the unsecured credit facility includes a competitive bid option, which allows banks that are part of the lender consortium to bid to make loans to the Company at a rate that is lower than the stated rate provided by the unsecured credit facility for up to $250,000. The competitive bid option may result in lower pricing if market conditions allow. The Company has $85,000 outstanding under this competitive bid option as of June 30, 2005 priced at LIBOR plus 0.29%, or 3.41%. The Company is subject to (i) certain customary covenants under the unsecured credit facility, including, but not limited to, maintaining certain maximum leverage ratios, a minimum fixed charges coverage ratio and minimum unencumbered assets and equity levels and (ii) prohibitions on paying dividends in amounts that exceed 95% of the Company’s Funds from Operations, as defined therein, except as may be required to maintain the Company’s REIT status. The credit facility matures in May 2008, assuming exercise of a one-year renewal option by the Company.

13


 

4. Stockholders’ Equity
The following summarizes the changes in stockholders’ equity for the six months ended June 30, 2005:
                                    Dividends   Accumulated    
                    Additional           less than   other    
    Preferred   Common   paid-in   Deferred   accumulated   comprehensive   Stockholders’
    stock   stock   capital   compensation   earnings   loss   equity
Balance at December 31, 2004
  $ 40     $ 726     $ 2,389,511     $ (8,659 )   $ 10,769     $ (7,096 )   $ 2,385,291  
 
                                                       
Net income
    —       —       —       —       126,521       —       126,521  
Unrealized gain on cash flow hedges
    —       —       —       —       —       946       946  
Dividends declared to common and preferred stockholders
    —       —       —       —       (108,127 )     —       (108,127 )
Issuance of common stock, net of withholdings
    —       7       32,121       (8,463 )     (356 )     —       23,309  
Issuance of stock options
    —       —       4,600       (4,600 )     —       —       —  
Amortization of deferred compensation
    —       —       —       4,503       —       —       4,503  
 
                                                       
 
                                                       
Balance at June 30, 2005
  $ 40     $ 733     $ 2,426,232     $ (17,219 )   $ 28,807     $ (6,150 )   $ 2,432,443  
 
                                                       
During the six months ended June 30, 2005, the Company (i) issued 549,817 shares of common stock in connection with stock options exercised, (ii) issued 33,102 shares of common stock to acquire an equal number of DownREIT limited partnership units, (iii) issued 738 shares through the Company’s dividend reinvestment plan, (iv) issued 163,792 common shares in connection with stock grants to employees of which 80% are restricted, (v) had forfeitures of 3,925 shares of restricted stock grants to employees and (vi) withheld 45,243 shares to satisfy employees’ tax withholding and other liabilities.
Dividends per common share for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 were $1.42 and $1.40 per share, respectively. In both the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, average dividends for preferred shares were $1.09 per share.
5. Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
The Company has historically used interest rate swap and cap agreements (collectively, the “Hedged Derivatives”) to reduce the impact of interest rate fluctuations on its variable rate, tax-exempt bonds and its variable rate conventional secured debt. The Company has not entered into any interest rate hedge agreements or treasury locks for its conventional unsecured debt and does not hold interest rate hedge agreements for trading or other speculative purposes. As of June 30, 2005, the Hedged Derivatives fix $68,000 of the Company’s tax-exempt debt at a weighted average interest rate of 6.3% through interest rate swaps. In addition, as of June 30, 2005, the Company has Hedged Derivatives on $166,000 of its variable rate debt, which floats at a weighted average coupon interest rate of 3.8% and has been capped at a weighted average interest rate of 8.0% through interest rate caps. These Hedged Derivatives have maturity dates ranging from 2007 to 2010. The Hedged Derivatives are accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 133. SFAS No. 133 requires that every derivative instrument be recorded on the balance sheet as either an asset or liability measured at its fair value, with changes in fair value recognized currently in earnings unless specific hedge accounting criteria are met.
The Company has determined that its Hedged Derivatives qualify as effective cash-flow hedges under SFAS No. 133, resulting in the Company recording all changes in the fair value of the Hedged Derivatives in other comprehensive income. Amounts recorded in other comprehensive income will be reclassified into earnings in the period in which earnings are affected by the hedged cash flow. To adjust the Hedged Derivatives to their fair value, the Company recorded unrealized gains to other comprehensive income of $946 and $935 during the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The estimated amount, included in accumulated other comprehensive income as of June 30, 2005, expected to be reclassified into earnings within the next twelve months to offset the variability of cash flow during this period is not material.

14


 

The Company assesses, both at inception and on an on-going basis, the effectiveness of all hedges in offsetting cash flow of hedged items. Hedge ineffectiveness did not have a material impact on earnings and the Company does not anticipate that it will have a material effect in the future. The fair values of the obligations under the Hedged Derivatives are included in accrued expenses and other liabilities on the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.
By using derivative financial instruments to hedge exposures to changes in interest rates, the Company exposes itself to credit risk and market risk. The credit risk is the risk of a counterparty not performing under the terms of the Hedged Derivatives. The counterparties to these Hedged Derivatives are major financial institutions which have an A+ or better credit rating by the Standard & Poor’s Ratings Group. The Company monitors the credit ratings of counterparties and the amount of the Company’s debt subject to Hedged Derivatives with any one party. Therefore, the Company believes the likelihood of realizing material losses from counterparty non-performance is remote. Market risk is the adverse effect of the value of financial instruments that results from a change in interest rates. The market risk associated with interest-rate contracts is managed by the establishment and monitoring of parameters that limit the types and degree of market risk that may be undertaken. These risks are managed by the Company’s Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President — Finance.
6. Investments in Unconsolidated Entities
Investments in Unconsolidated Real Estate Entities
The Company accounts for investments in unconsolidated real estate entities that are not considered variable interest entities under FIN 46 in accordance with SOP 78-9 and APB Opinion No. 18. The Company applies the equity method of accounting to an investment in an entity if it owns greater than 20% of the equity value or has significant and disproportionate influence over that entity. At June 30, 2005, the Company’s investments in unconsolidated real estate entities accounted for under the equity method of accounting consisted of:
  •   a general partnership interest in a partnership that owns the Avalon Run community, in which after the partnership makes certain distributions to the third-party partner, the Company will generally be entitled to receive 40% of all operating cash flow distributions and 49% of all residual cash flow following a sale;
 
  •   a limited liability company membership interest in a limited liability company that owns the Avalon Grove community, in which after the limited liability company makes certain distributions to the third-party partner, the Company will generally be entitled to receive 50% of all distributions;
 
  •   a 25% limited liability company membership interest (with a right to 50% of distributions after achievement of a threshold return) in a limited liability company that owns the Avalon Bedford community;
 
  •   a 20% limited liability company membership interest (with a right to 50% of distributions after achievement of a threshold return) in the limited liability company that is developing and will own the Avalon Chrystie Place I community;
 
  •   a 25% limited liability company membership interest (with a right to 45% of distributions after achievement of a threshold return) in the limited liability company that is developing and will own the Mission Bay North II community; and
 
  •   a 15.2% combined general partner and indirect limited partner equity interest in AvalonBay Value Added Fund, L.P. (the “Fund”), which owns the Redondo Beach, Avalon Lakeside, Hobbits Grove and Ravenswood communities.

15


 

The following is a combined summary of the financial position of the entities accounted for using the equity method, as of the dates presented:
                 
    (Unaudited)
    6-30-05   12-31-04
Assets:
               
Real estate, net
  $ 375,789     $ 221,236  
Other assets
    77,145       86,821  
 
               
Total assets
  $ 452,934     $ 308,057  
 
               
 
               
Liabilities and partners’ equity:
               
Mortgage notes payable and credit facility
  $ 241,678     $ 139,500  
Other liabilities
    31,175       32,579  
Partners’ equity
    180,081       135,978  
 
               
Total liabilities and partners’ equity
  $ 452,934     $ 308,057  
 
               
The following is a combined summary of the operating results of the entities accounted for using the equity method, for the periods presented:
                                 
    For the three months ended   For the six months ended
    (unaudited)   (unaudited)
    6-30-05   6-30-04   6-30-05   6-30-04
Rental income
  $ 8,061     $ 5,343     $ 13,815     $ 10,450  
Operating and other expenses
    (4,825 )     (2,030 )     (8,194 )     (4,102 )
Interest expense, net
    (1,387 )     (443 )     (1,942 )     (893 )
Depreciation expense
    (1,804 )     (999 )     (2,917 )     (2,002 )
 
                               
Net income
  $ 45     $ 1,871     $ 762     $ 3,453  
 
                               
The Company has also entered into two agreements whereby upon completion of construction of two communities currently under construction, the communities will each be owned through a joint venture arrangement. The Company will retain a 30% equity interest in one of the joint ventures, but will not retain an equity interest (only a residual profits interest) in the second joint venture.
7. Discontinued Operations – Real Estate Assets Sold or Held for Sale
During the six months ended June 30, 2005, the Company sold three communities, one located in San Diego, California, one located in the San Jose, California area and one located in the Fairfield-New Haven, Connecticut area. These three communities, which contained a total of 531 apartment homes, were sold for an aggregate sales price of $116,950, resulting in net proceeds, net of selling costs, of $114,942 and a gain calculated in accordance with GAAP of $60,261.
In addition, as of June 30, 2005, the Company had one community that qualified as held for sale under the provisions of SFAS No. 144. As required under SFAS No. 144, the operations for any communities sold from January 1, 2004 through June 30, 2005 and communities held for sale as of June 30, 2005 have been presented as discontinued operations in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. Accordingly, certain reclassifications have been made in prior periods to reflect discontinued operations consistent with current period presentation. The following is a summary of income from discontinued operations for the periods presented:

16


 

                                 
    For the three months ended   For the six months ended
    6-30-05   6-30-04   6-30-05   6-30-04
Rental income
  $ 1,052     $ 6,320     $ 3,615     $ 13,575  
Operating and other expenses
    (259 )     (2,202 )     (1,023 )     (4,602 )
Interest expense, net
    —       (118 )     —       (371 )
Minority interest expense
    —       (12 )     —       (25 )
Depreciation expense
    —       (1,224 )     (140 )     (2,575 )
 
                               
Income from discontinued operations
  $ 793     $ 2,764     $ 2,452     $ 6,002  
 
                               
The Company’s Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets include other assets (excluding net real estate) of $95 and $482, and other liabilities of $284 and $1,007 as of June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively, relating to real estate assets sold or held for sale. The estimated proceeds less anticipated costs to sell the real estate asset held for sale as of June 30, 2005 are greater than the carrying value as of June 30, 2005, and therefore no provision for possible loss was recorded.
During the six months ended June 30, 2005, the Company sold two parcels of land, one located in Seattle, Washington and one located in the Oakland-East Bay area, for an aggregate sales price of $23,000. The Company recorded an impairment loss in the amount of $3,000 in 2002 related to one of these land parcels to reflect the land at fair value based on its entitlement status at the time it was determined planned for disposition. The sale of these two land parcels resulted in an aggregate GAAP gain of $4,617.
8. Segment Reporting
The Company’s reportable operating segments include Established Communities, Other Stabilized Communities, and Development/Redevelopment Communities. Annually as of January 1st, the Company determines which of its communities fall into each of these categories and maintains that classification, unless disposition plans regarding a community change, throughout the year for the purpose of reporting segment operations.
  •   Established Communities (also known as Same Store Communities) are communities where a comparison of operating results from the prior year to the current year is meaningful, as these communities were owned and had stabilized occupancy and operating expenses as of the beginning of the prior year. For the year 2005, the Established Communities are communities that had stabilized occupancy and operating expenses as of January 1, 2004, are not conducting or planning to conduct substantial redevelopment activities and are not held for sale or planned for disposition within the current year. A community is considered to have stabilized occupancy at the earlier of (i) attainment of 95% physical occupancy or (ii) the one-year anniversary of completion of development or redevelopment. The number of Established Communities was adjusted during the three months ended June 30, 2005 to reflect changes in the Company’s disposition program. All amounts for Established Communities have been adjusted from amounts previously reported to reflect this new classification.
 
  •   Other Stabilized Communities includes all other completed communities that have stabilized occupancy, as defined above. Other Stabilized Communities do not include communities that are conducting or planning to conduct substantial redevelopment activities within the current year.
 
  •   Development/Redevelopment Communities consists of communities that are under construction and have not received a final certificate of occupancy, communities where substantial redevelopment is in progress or is planned to begin during the current year and communities under lease-up, that had not reached stabilized occupancy, as defined above, as of January 1, 2004.
In addition, the Company owns land held for future development and has other corporate assets that are not allocated to an operating segment.
SFAS No. 131, “Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information,” requires that segment disclosures present the measure(s) used by the chief operating decision maker for purposes of assessing such segments’ performance. The Company’s chief operating decision maker is comprised of several members of its executive management team who use Net Operating Income (“NOI”) as the primary financial measure for

17


 

Established and Other Stabilized Communities. NOI is defined by the Company as total property revenue less direct property operating expenses, including property taxes, and excludes corporate-level income (including management, development and other fees), corporate-level property management and other indirect operating expenses, investments and investment management, interest income and expense, general and administrative expense, equity in income of unconsolidated entities, minority interest in consolidated partnerships, venture partner interest in profit-sharing, depreciation expense, cumulative effect of change in accounting principle, gain on sale of real estate assets and income from discontinued operations. Although the Company considers NOI a useful measure of a community’s or communities’ operating performance, NOI should not be considered an alternative to net income or net cash flow from operating activities, as determined in accordance with GAAP.
A reconciliation of NOI to net income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 is as follows:

    For the three months ended   For the six months ended
    6-30-05   6-30-04      6-30-05   6-30-04
Net income
  $ 56,911     $ 35,034     $ 126,521     $ 60,311  
Corporate-level property management and other indirect operating expenses
    7,594       7,121       14,722       13,694  
Corporate-level other income
    (1,441 )     (206 )     (2,054 )     (747 )
Investments and investment management
    1,171       1,711       2,164       2,551  
Interest income
    (270 )     (36 )     (301 )     (56 )
Interest expense
    32,379       32,416       64,533       64,610  
General and administrative expense
    6,262       4,486       13,421       9,200  
Equity in income of unconsolidated entities
    (178 )     (276 )     (6,761 )     (463 )
Minority interest in consolidated partnerships
    337       408       851       250  
Venture partner interest in profit-sharing
    —       352       —       677  
Depreciation expense
    40,202       38,949       81,168       77,295  
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle
    —       —       —       (4,547 )
Gain on sale of real estate assets
    (27,264 )     (12,375 )     (64,878 )     (12,375 )
Income from discontinued operations
    (793 )     (2,764 )     (2,452 )     (6,002 )
 
                               
Net operating income
  $ 114,910     $ 104,820     $ 226,934     $ 204,398  
 
                               
The primary performance measure for communities under development or redevelopment depends on the stage of completion. While under development, management monitors actual construction costs against budgeted costs as well as lease-up pace and rent levels compared to budget.

18


 

The following table provides details of the Company’s segment information as of the dates specified. The segments are classified based on the individual community’s status as of the beginning of the given calendar year. Therefore, each year the composition of communities within each business segment is adjusted. Accordingly, the amounts between years are not directly comparable. The accounting policies applicable to the operating segments described above are the same as those described in Note 1, “Organization and Significant Accounting Policies.” Segment information for the three and six months ending June 30, 2005 and 2004 has been adjusted for the communities that were designated as held for sale as of June 30, 2005 or sold from January 1, 2004 through June 30, 2005 as described in Note 7, “Discontinued Operations – Real Estate Assets Sold or Held for Sale.”
                                                                 
    For the three months ended   For the six months ended
    Total           % NOI change   Gross   Total           % NOI change   Gross
    revenue   NOI   from prior year   real estate (1)   revenue   NOI   from prior year   real estate (1)
For the periods ended June 30, 2005
                                                               
 
                                                               
Established
                                                               
Northeast
  $ 41,597     $ 27,742       (0.6 %)   $ 1,056,726     $ 82,574     $ 55,110       2.5 %   $ 1,056,726  
Mid-Atlantic
    16,985       11,974       3.1 %     386,622       33,483       23,702       1.6 %     386,622  
Midwest
    2,798       1,798       16.2 %     91,180       5,515       3,475       11.4 %     91,180  
Pacific Northwest
    7,393       4,812       8.6 %     314,873       14,700       9,608       7.4 %     314,873  
Northern California
    37,622       25,964       2.6 %     1,520,691       74,874       51,644       2.1 %     1,520,691  
Southern California
    12,037       8,673       5.7 %     330,297       23,922       17,318       5.5 %     330,297  
 
                                                               
Total Established
    118,432       80,963       2.5 %     3,700,389       235,068       160,857       3.0 %     3,700,389  
 
                                                               
 
Other Stabilized
    24,181       16,042       n/a       818,608       47,295       30,808       n/a       818,608  
Development / Redevelopment
    27,823       17,905       n/a       1,048,027       54,899       35,269       n/a       1,048,027  
Land Held for Future Development
    n/a       n/a       n/a       211,119       n/a       n/a       n/a       211,119  
Non-allocated (2)
    1,441       n/a       n/a       22,019       2,054       n/a       n/a       22,019  
 
                                                               
Total
  $ 171,877     $ 114,910       9.6 %   $ 5,800,162     $ 339,316     $ 226,934       11.0 %   $ 5,800,162  
 
                                                               
 
                                                               
For the periods ended June 30, 2004
                                                               
 
                                                               
Established
                                                               
Northeast
  $ 37,167     $ 25,363       (0.8 %)   $ 914,298     $ 73,394     $ 48,840       (3.0 %)   $ 914,298  
Mid-Atlantic
    12,936       9,108       4.2 %     272,915       25,649       18,051       3.7 %     272,915  
Midwest
    2,682       1,547       1.7 %     90,665       5,341       3,120       6.0 %     90,665  
Pacific Northwest
    7,915       4,924       2.9 %     346,730       15,776       9,901       0.7 %     346,730  
Northern California
    33,382       23,291       (6.3 %)     1,339,815       66,793       46,683       (8.1 %)     1,339,815  
Southern California
    13,849       9,799       2.4 %     400,816       27,721       19,650       0.9 %     400,816  
 
                                                               
Total Established
    107,931       74,032       (1.3 %)     3,365,239       214,674       146,245       (3.0 %)     3,365,239  
 
                                                               
 
Other Stabilized
    27,421       17,672       n/a       1,015,933       54,133       34,840       n/a       1,015,933  
Development / Redevelopment
    21,856       13,116       n/a       953,213       40,369       23,313       n/a       953,213  
Land Held for Future Development
    n/a       n/a       n/a       102,418       n/a       n/a       n/a       102,418  
Non-allocated (2)
    206       n/a       n/a       20,784       447       n/a       n/a       20,784  
 
                                                               
Total
  $ 157,414     $ 104,820       8.6 %   $ 5,457,587     $ 309,623     $ 204,398       6.2 %   $ 5,457,587  
 
                                                               

(1)   Does not include gross real estate assets for discontinued operations of $13,926 and $165,275 as of June 30, 2005 and June 30, 2004, respectively.
 
(2)   Revenue represents third-party management, accounting and developer fees and miscellaneous income which are not allocated to a reportable segment.

19


 

9. Related Party Arrangements
Unconsolidated Entities
The Company manages several unconsolidated real estate entities for which it receives management fee, asset management fee and development fee revenue. From these entities the Company received management fee revenue of $1,323 and $1,746 in the three and six months ended June 30, 2005, respectively, and $181 and $351 in the three and six months ended June 30, 2004, respectively.
In addition, in connection with the general contractor services that the Company provides to CVP I, LLC, the entity that owns and is developing Avalon Chrystie Place I, the Company has funded certain construction costs on behalf of CVP I, LLC and expects to be reimbursed through draws on the related construction loan. As of June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, the Company has recorded a receivable from CVP I, LLC in the amounts of $8,018 and $19,983, respectively. The Company provides similar services to Mission Bay Venture Partners, LLC, the entity that owns and is developing Avalon at Mission Bay North II. The Company has funded $8,798 in construction costs on behalf of Mission Bay Venture Partners, LLC as of June 30, 2005 and has recorded a corresponding receivable from Mission Bay Venture Partners, LLC. The Company expects to be reimbursed through draws on a construction loan. These receivables are included in prepaid expenses and other assets on the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Director Compensation
The Company’s 1994 Plan provides that directors of the Company who are also employees receive no additional compensation for their services as a director. In accordance with the Company’s 1994 Plan, as then in effect, on the fifth business day following the Company’s May 2003 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, each of the Company’s non-employee directors automatically received options to purchase 7,000 shares of common stock at the last reported sale price of the common stock on the NYSE on such date, and a restricted stock grant (or, in lieu thereof, a deferred stock award) of 2,500 shares of common stock. On May 14, 2003, the Company’s Board of Directors approved an amendment to the 1994 Plan pursuant to which, in lieu of the stock and option awards described above, each non-employee director would receive, following the 2004 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and each annual meeting thereafter, (i) a number of shares of restricted stock (or deferred stock awards) having a value of $100 based on the last reported sale price of the common stock on the NYSE on the fifth business day following the prior year’s annual meeting and (ii) $30 cash, payable in quarterly installments of $7.5. A non-employee director may elect to receive all or a portion of such cash payment in the form of a deferred stock award. In addition, the Lead Independent Director receives an annual fee of $30 payable in equal monthly installments of $2.5. The Company recorded non-employee director compensation expense relating to the restricted stock grants, deferred stock awards and stock options in the amount of $234 and $452 in the three and six months ended June 30, 2005, respectively, and $226 and $456 in the three and six months ended June 30, 2004, respectively. Deferred compensation relating to these restricted stock grants, deferred stock awards and stock options was $1,043 and $748 on June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively.
10. Subsequent Events
On July 1, 2005, the Company sold Avalon Crossing, a 132 apartment home community located in the Washington, DC area for a gross sales price of $44,500, resulting in a GAAP gain of approximately $33,400. The net proceeds of approximately $44,000 were used to reduce borrowings under the Company’s unsecured credit facility. This community was classified as held for sale under the provisions of SFAS No. 144 as of June 30, 2005 (see Note 7, “Discontinued Operations – Real Estate Assets Sold or Held for Sale”).
Avalon at Poplar Creek, a 196 apartment home community located in the Chicago, Illinois area, was acquired by the Fund on July 1, 2005 for a purchase price of $24,950. The Company’s pro rata share of the required capital investment for this acquisition is $3,780.
As of July 29, 2005, seven communities previously held for operating purposes were classified as held for sale under SFAS No. 144. These communities have a net real estate carrying value of $202,137 as of June 30, 2005. The Company is actively pursuing the disposition of these communities and expects to close on six of these dispositions during the second half of 2005.

20


 

ITEM 2.   MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
We focus on the investment in and ownership and operation of apartment communities in high barrier-to-entry markets of the United States. As of July 29, 2005, we owned 139 current operating communities, which are the primary contributors to our overall operating performance. The net operating income of these communities, which is one of the financial measures that we use to evaluate community performance, is affected by the demand and supply dynamics within our markets, our rental rates and occupancy levels, and our ability to control operating costs. Our overall financial performance is also impacted by the general availability and cost of capital and the performance of our newly developed and acquired apartment communities. We seek to create long-term shareholder value by accessing capital on cost effective terms; deploying that capital to develop, redevelop and acquire apartment communities in high barrier-to-entry markets; operating apartment communities; and selling communities when they no longer meet our long-term investment strategy and when pricing is attractive.
This Form 10-Q, including the following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations, contains forward-looking statements that predict or indicate future events or trends and that do not report historical matters. Actual results or developments could differ materially from those projected in such statements as a result of the risk factors set forth on page 47 of this report. The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and notes included elsewhere in this report, as well as our Annual Report filed on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 and our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q for subsequent quarters.
Business Description and Community Information Overview
We believe that apartment communities present an attractive long-term investment opportunity compared to other real estate investments because a broad potential resident base should help reduce demand volatility over a real estate cycle. We intend to continue to pursue real estate investments in markets where constraints to new supply exist, and where new rental household formations are expected to out-pace multi-family permit activity over the course of the real estate cycle. Barriers-to-entry in our markets generally include a difficult and lengthy entitlement process with local jurisdictions and dense urban or suburban areas where zoned and entitled land is in limited supply.
We regularly evaluate the allocation of our investments by the amount of invested capital and by product type within our individual markets, which are located in the Northeast, Mid-Atlantic, Midwest, Pacific Northwest, and Northern and Southern California regions of the United States. Our strategy is to more deeply penetrate these markets with a broad range of products and services and an intense focus on our customer. A substantial majority of our communities are upscale, which generally command among the highest rents in their markets. However, we also pursue the ownership and operation of apartment communities that target a variety of customer segments and price points, consistent with our goal of offering a broad range of products and services.
We believe that, over an entire real estate cycle, lower housing affordability and the limited new supply of apartment homes in our markets will result in a higher propensity to rent and larger increases in cash flow relative to other markets. However, throughout the real estate cycle, apartment market fundamentals, and therefore operating cash flows, are affected by overall economic conditions. A number of our markets experienced economic contraction due to job losses in 2002 and 2003, particularly in the technology, telecom and financial services sectors. This resulted in a prolonged period of weak apartment market fundamentals as reflected in declining rental rates and demand. However, 2004 was a year of transition, where the economy showed signs of an early phase recovery, as evidenced by modest job growth and declining unemployment claims. The improvement in the economic environment has resulted in more stabilized apartment market fundamentals, and 2005 is proving to be a year of continued growth.

21


 

This is supported by the following operating results achieved within our Established Community portfolio during the three months ending June 30, 2005:
  •   we achieved both sequential and year-over-year revenue growth, the largest year-over-year increase in over three years and the largest sequential increase in over four years;
 
  •   we reached a transition point in drivers of rental rate growth, shifting from occupancy gains to increases in rental rates as the primary driver;
 
  •   we achieved the highest year-over-year increase in average rental rates in three years; and
 
  •   economic occupancy remained at approximately 95% in each of our markets, despite increases in rental rates.
For the remainder of 2005, we expect continued job growth in our markets and additional apartments taken off the rental market through condominium conversion. Accordingly, apartment market fundamentals (the demand/supply balance) will continue to improve such that apartment rental demand will outpace new supply. The improvement may not be experienced evenly throughout our markets, as seen during the first six months of 2005, but we nevertheless expect continued overall revenue growth for our Established Community portfolio in 2005.
In anticipation of continued improvement in apartment fundamentals and stronger apartment demand, we have been increasing our development volume. We continue to secure new Development Rights, as discussed below, including the acquisition of land for future development, and we anticipate having close to $950,000,000 under construction by the end of 2005 (measured by total capitalized cost of the communities, including the portions owned by joint venture partners, at completion).
We continue to look for acquisition opportunities through our investment in and management of a discretionary investment fund (the “Fund”), which during its investment period, will be our exclusive vehicle for acquiring apartment communities, subject to certain exceptions. The acquisition environment is currently very competitive, particularly as a result of the condominium market, and therefore we will continue to be selective and focus on only those acquisition opportunities where we believe we can create value, generally through redevelopment or repositioning opportunities.
The competitive acquisition environment and the strength of the condominium market results in an attractive selling environment. There continues to be strong institutional demand for high-quality apartment communities, particularly from condominium converters. We continue to be an opportunistic seller, disposing of three apartment communities in the first six months of 2005. We anticipate continuing disposition activity and have increased our expectation for disposition volume to approximately $500,000,000 for the full year 2005 in response to the strong demand for product in our markets. While the active condominium market has created demand for multi-family apartment communities, it has also created a challenging environment for us in other ways, such as:
  •   increased competition for land and subcontractors;
 
  •   increased competition for experienced multi-family development and construction professionals, particularly in our markets;
 
  •   increased competition for our customers, resulting in increased move-outs due to home ownership; and
 
  •   increased risk of potential liability from disposing of communities to condominium converters.
Our real estate investments consist primarily of current operating apartment communities, communities in various stages of development (“Development Communities”) and Development Rights as defined below. Our current operating communities are further distinguished as Established Communities, Other Stabilized Communities, Lease-Up Communities and Redevelopment Communities. The following is a description of each category:
Current Communities are categorized as Established, Other Stabilized, Lease-Up, or Redevelopment according to the following attributes:
  •   Established Communities (also known as Same Store Communities) are communities where a comparison of operating results from the prior year to the current year is meaningful, as these communities were owned and had

22


 

      stabilized occupancy and operating expenses as of the beginning of the prior year. We determine which of our communities fall into the Established Communities category as of January 1st of each year and maintain that classification throughout the year, unless disposition plans regarding a community change. For the year 2005, the Established Communities were communities that had stabilized occupancy and operating expenses as of January 1, 2004 and were not conducting or planning to conduct substantial redevelopment activities, as described below, and were not held for sale or planned for disposition in 2005. We consider a community to have stabilized occupancy at the earlier of (i) attainment of 95% physical occupancy or (ii) the one-year anniversary of completion of development or redevelopment. The number of Established Communities was adjusted during the three months ended June 30, 2005 to reflect changes in the Company’s disposition program. All amounts for Established Communities have been adjusted from amounts previously reported to reflect this new classification.
 
  •   Other Stabilized Communities includes all other completed communities that have stabilized occupancy, as defined above. Other Stabilized Communities do not include communities that are conducting or planning to conduct substantial redevelopment activities within the current year.
 
  •   Lease-Up Communities are communities where construction has been complete for less than one year and where physical occupancy has not reached 95%.
 
  •   Redevelopment Communities are communities where substantial redevelopment is in progress or is planned to begin during the current year. Redevelopment is considered substantial when capital invested during the reconstruction effort exceeds the lesser of $5,000,000 or 10% of the community’s acquisition cost.
Development Communities are communities that are under construction and for which a final certificate of occupancy has not been received. These communities may be partially complete and operating.
Development Rights are development opportunities in the early phase of the development process for which we either have an option to acquire land or to enter into a leasehold interest, for which we are the buyer under a long-term conditional contract to purchase land or where we own land to develop a new community. We capitalize related pre-development costs incurred in pursuit of new developments for which we currently believe future development is probable.
In addition, we own our corporate office building and a regional office building, in Alexandria, Virginia and New Canaan, Connecticut, respectively, with an aggregate of approximately 77,000 square feet of office space. All other regional and administrative offices are leased under operating leases.

23


 

As of June 30, 2005, our communities were classified as follows:
                 
    Number of   Number of
    communities   apartment homes
Current Communities
               
 
               
Established Communities:
               
Northeast
    30       7,657  
Mid-Atlantic
    13       4,247  
Midwest
    3       887  
Pacific Northwest
    10       2,500  
Northern California
    31       9,069  
Southern California
    10       3,207  
 
               
Total Established
    97       27,567  
 
               
 
               
Other Stabilized Communities:
               
Northeast
    19       5,641  
Mid-Atlantic
    7       2,238  
Midwest
    1       409  
Pacific Northwest
    2       638  
Northern California
    1       135  
Southern California
    4       1,391  
 
               
Total Other Stabilized
    34       10,452  
 
               
 
               
Lease-Up Communities
    4       968  
 
               
Redevelopment Communities
    4       1,491  
 
               
 
               
Total Current Communities
    139       40,478  
 
               
 
               
Development Communities
    11       2,593  
 
               
 
               
Development Rights
    46       12,216  
 
               
In July 2005, we disposed of one community containing 132 apartment homes, and the Fund acquired one community containing 196 apartment homes. As of July 29, 2005 our 139 current communities consisted of 40,542 apartment homes. Of those communities, we owned:
  •   a fee simple, or absolute, ownership interest in 113 operating communities, five of which are on land subject to land leases expiring in July 2029, January 2062, April 2095, May 2099 and March 2142;
 
  •   a general partnership interest in three partnerships that each own a fee simple interest in an operating community;
 
  •   a general partnership interest and an indirect limited partnership interest in a partnership that owns a fee simple interest in five operating communities;
 
  •   a general partnership interest in five partnerships structured as “DownREITs,” as described more fully below, that own an aggregate of 15 communities; and
 
  •   a membership interest in three limited liability companies that each hold a fee simple interest in an operating community, one of which is on land subject to a land lease expiring in November 2089.
We also hold a fee simple ownership interest in nine of the Development Communities, two of which will be subject to joint venture ownership structures upon construction completion, in addition to membership interests in two limited liability companies that each own one Development Community, both of which are subject to land leases expiring in December 2026 and June 2103.

24


 

In each of our five partnerships structured as DownREITs, either AvalonBay or one of our wholly-owned subsidiaries is the general partner, and there are one or more limited partners whose interest in the partnership is represented by units of limited partnership interest. For each DownREIT partnership, limited partners are entitled to receive an initial distribution before any distribution is made to the general partner. Although the partnership agreements for each of the DownREITs are different, generally the distributions per unit paid to the holders of units of limited partnership interests have approximated our current common stock dividend amount. Each DownREIT partnership has been structured so that it is unlikely the limited partners will be entitled to a distribution greater than the initial distribution provided for in the applicable partnership agreement. The holders of units of limited partnership interest have the right to present all or some of their units for redemption for a cash amount as determined by the applicable partnership agreement and based on the fair value of our common stock. In lieu of a cash redemption by the partnership, we may elect to acquire any unit presented for redemption for one share of our common stock or for such cash amount. As of July 29, 2005, there were 470,226 DownREIT partnership units outstanding. The DownREIT partnerships are consolidated for financial reporting purposes.
We elected to be taxed as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) for federal income tax purposes for the year ended December 31, 1994 and we have not revoked that election. We were incorporated under the laws of the State of California in 1978, and we were reincorporated in the State of Maryland in July 1995. Our principal executive offices are located at 2900 Eisenhower Avenue, Suite 300, Alexandria, Virginia, 22314, and our telephone number at that location is (703) 329-6300. We also maintain regional offices and administrative or specialty offices in or near the following cities:
  •   Boston, Massachusetts;
 
  •   Chicago, Illinois;
 
  •   Long Island, New York;
 
  •   New Canaan, Connecticut;
 
  •   New York, New York;
 
  •   Newport Beach, California;
 
  •   San Jose, California;
 
  •   Seattle, Washington; and
 
  •   Woodbridge, New Jersey.
Recent Developments
Development Activities. During the three months ended June 30, 2005, we completed the development of two communities, Avalon Run East II, located in Central New Jersey and Avalon Orange, located in the Fairfield-New Haven, Connecticut area. These garden-style communities contain an aggregate of 480 apartment homes and were completed for a total capitalized cost of $74,300,000.
We commenced development on two communities during the three months ended June 30, 2005. Avalon Pines II, located in Long Island, New York, is expected to contain 152 apartment homes when completed, for a total capitalized cost of $26,600,000. Avalon Chestnut Hill, located in the greater Boston, Massachusetts area, is expected to contain 204 apartment homes when completed, for a total capitalized cost of $60,600,000.
In addition, we completed the redevelopment of one community, Avalon Towers, located in the Long Island, New York area. This high-rise community contains 109 apartment homes and was completed for a total capitalized cost of $21,200,000, of which $17,300,000 was incurred prior to redevelopment.
We acquired five parcels of land during the three months ended June 30, 2005 to hold for future development, for an aggregate purchase price of $45,534,000. These parcels of land, if developed as expected, will contain 1,154 apartment homes for a total capitalized cost of $297,000,000.
The development and redevelopment of communities involves risks that the investment will fail to perform in accordance with our expectations. See “Risks of Development and Redevelopment” for our discussion of these and other risks inherent in developing or redeveloping communities.

25


 

Disposition Activities. During the three months ended June 30, 2005, we sold one community, Avalon Lake, located in the Fairfield-New Haven, Connecticut area. This community, which contained 135 apartment homes, was sold for a sales price of $37,700,000 which resulted in net proceeds of $36,961,000. A gain calculated in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) of $22,647,000 was recorded in conjunction with the sale of this community.
In addition, we sold two land parcels, one located in Seattle, Washington and one in the Oakland-East Bay, California area, for an aggregate sales price of $23,000,000. The sale of these land parcels resulted in net proceeds of $22,760,000 and a gain calculated in accordance with GAAP of $4,617,000.
Critical Accounting Policies
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to use judgment in the application of accounting policies, including making estimates and assumptions. If our judgment or interpretation of the facts and circumstances relating to various transactions had been different, or different estimates or assumptions had been made, it is possible that different accounting policies would have been applied, resulting in different financial results or a different presentation of our financial statements. Below is a discussion of accounting policies that we consider critical to an understanding of our financial condition and operating results and that may require complex judgment in their application or require estimates about matters which are inherently uncertain. As a REIT that owns, operates and develops apartment communities, our critical accounting policies relate to revenue recognition, cost capitalization, asset impairment evaluation and REIT status. A discussion of all of our accounting policies, including further discussion of the critical accounting policies described below, can be found in Note 1, “Organization and Significant Accounting Policies” of our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
Revenue Recognition
Rental income related to leases is recognized on an accrual basis when due from residents in accordance with SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104, “Revenue Recognition” and Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 13, “Accounting for Leases.” In accordance with our standard lease terms, rental payments are generally due on a monthly basis. Any cash concessions given at the inception of the lease are amortized over the approximate life of the lease, which is generally one year. A discussion regarding the impact of cash concessions on rental revenue for Established Communities can be found in “Results of Operations.”
Cost Capitalization
We capitalize costs during the development of assets (including interest and related loan fees, property taxes and other direct and indirect costs) beginning when active development commences until the asset, or a portion of the asset, is delivered and is ready for its intended use, which is generally indicated by the issuance of a certificate of occupancy. We capitalize costs during redevelopment of apartment homes (including interest and related loan fees, property taxes and other direct and indirect costs) beginning when an apartment home is taken out-of-service for redevelopment until the apartment home redevelopment is completed and the apartment home is available for a new resident. Rental income and operating expenses incurred during the initial lease-up or post-redevelopment lease-up period are fully recognized as they accrue.
We capitalize pre-development costs incurred in pursuit of Development Rights for which we currently believe future development is probable. These costs include legal fees, design fees and related overhead costs. Future development of these Development Rights is dependent upon various factors, including zoning and regulatory approval, rental market conditions, construction costs and availability of capital. Pre-development costs incurred in the pursuit of Development Rights for which future development is not yet considered probable are expensed as incurred. In addition, if the status of a Development Right changes, deeming future development no longer probable, any capitalized pre-development costs are written-off with a charge to expense.

26


 

We generally capitalize only non-recurring expenditures. We capitalize improvements and upgrades only if the item: (i) exceeds $15,000; (ii) extends the useful life of the asset; and (iii) is not related to making an apartment home ready for the next resident. Under this policy, virtually all capitalized costs are non-recurring, as recurring make-ready costs are expensed as incurred. Recurring make-ready costs include: (i) carpet and appliance replacements; (ii) floor coverings; (iii) interior painting; and (iv) other redecorating costs. Because we expense recurring make-ready costs, such as carpet replacements, our expense levels and volatility are greatest in the third quarter of each year as this is when we experience our greatest amount of turnover. We capitalize purchases of personal property, such as computers and furniture, only if the item is a new addition and the item exceeds $2,500. We generally expense replacements of personal property. For Established and Other Stabilized Communities, we recorded non-revenue generating capital expenditures of $239 per apartment home in the six months ended June 30, 2005 and $160 per apartment home in the six months ended June 30, 2004. The average maintenance costs charged to expense per apartment home, including carpet and appliance replacements, related to these communities decreased to $644 in the six months ended June 30, 2005 as compared to $667 in the six months ended June 30, 2004, primarily due to cost containment. Historically, we have experienced a gradual increase in capitalized costs and expensed maintenance costs per apartment home as the average age of our communities has increased, and expensed maintenance costs have fluctuated with turnover. We expect these trends to continue, with capitalized costs increasing during the second half of 2005 as compared to prior year levels, as we embark on a number of community upgrades and improvements. We expect total capitalized costs per apartment home in 2005 to be in the range of $525 to $575 per apartment home.
Asset Impairment Evaluation
If there is an event or change in circumstance that indicates an impairment in the value of a community, our policy is to assess the impairment by making a comparison of the current and projected operating cash flow of the community over its remaining useful life, on an undiscounted basis, to the carrying amount of the community. If the carrying amount is in excess of the estimated projected operating cash flow of the community, we would recognize an impairment loss equivalent to an amount required to adjust the carrying amount to its estimated fair market value. Real estate assets held for sale are measured at the lower of the carrying amount or the fair value less the cost to sell.
We account for our investments in unconsolidated entities that are not variable interest entities in accordance with Statement of Position 78-9, “Accounting for Investments in Real Estate Ventures” and Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 18, “The Equity Method of Accounting for Investments in Common Stock.” If there is an event or change in circumstance that indicates a loss in the value of an investment, we record the loss and reduce the value of the investment to its fair value. A loss in value would be indicated if we could not recover the carrying value of the investment or if the investee could not sustain an earnings capacity that would justify the carrying amount of the investment.
REIT Status
We are a Maryland corporation that has elected to be treated, for federal income tax purposes, as a REIT. We elected to be taxed as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, for the year ended December 31, 1994 and have not revoked such election. A corporate REIT is a legal entity which holds real estate interests and must meet a number of organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement that it currently distribute at least 90% of its adjusted taxable income to stockholders. As a REIT, we generally will not be subject to corporate level federal income tax on taxable income we distribute currently to our stockholders. If we fail to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, we will be subject to federal income taxes at regular corporate rates (including any applicable alternative minimum tax) and may not be able to qualify as a REIT for four subsequent taxable years.

27


 

Results of Operations
Our year-over-year operating performance is primarily affected by changes in net operating income of our current operating apartment communities due to market conditions, net operating income derived from acquisitions and development completions, the loss of net operating income related to disposed communities and capital market, disposition and financing activity. A comparison of our operating results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 follows (dollars in thousands):

    For the three months ended   For the six months ended
    6-30-05   6-30-04   $ Change   % Change      6-30-05   6-30-04   $ Change   % Change
Revenue:
                                                               
Rental and other income
  $ 170,514     $ 157,257     $ 13,257       8.4 %   $ 337,520     $ 309,318     $ 28,202       9.1 %
Management, development and other fees
    1,363       157       1,206       768.2 %     1,796       305       1,491       488.9 %
 
                                                               
Total revenue
    171,877       157,414       14,463       9.2 %     339,316       309,623       29,693       9.6 %
 
                                                               
 
                                                               
Expenses:
                                                               
Direct property operating expenses, excluding property taxes
    38,754       37,626       1,128       3.0 %     76,867       74,487       2,380       3.2 %
Property taxes
    16,772       14,762       2,010       13.6 %     33,461       29,991       3,470       11.6 %
 
                                                               
Total community operating expenses
    55,526       52,388       3,138       6.0 %     110,328       104,478       5,850       5.6 %
 
                                                               
 
                                                               
Corporate—level property management and other indirect operating expenses
    7,594       7,121       473       6.6 %     14,722       13,694       1,028       7.5 %
Investments and investment management
    1,171       1,711       (540 )     (31.6 %)     2,164       2,551       (387 )     (15.2 %)
Interest expense
    32,379       32,416       (37 )     (0.1 %)     64,533       64,610       (77 )     (0.1 %)
Depreciation expense
    40,202       38,949       1,253       3.2 %     81,168       77,295       3,873       5.0 %
General and administrative expense
    6,262       4,486       1,776       39.6 %     13,421       9,200       4,221       45.9 %
 
                                                               
Total other expenses
    87,608       84,683       2,925       3.5 %     176,008       167,350       8,658       5.2 %
 
                                                               
 
                                                               
Equity in income of unconsolidated entities
    178       276       (98 )     (35.5 %)     6,761       463       6,298       1,360.3 %
Interest income
    270       36       234       650.0 %     301       56       245       437.5 %
Venture partner interest in profit-sharing
    —       (352 )     352       (100.0 %)     —       (677 )     677       (100.0 %)
Minority interest in consolidated partnerships
    (337 )     (408 )     71       (17.4 %)     (851 )     (250 )     (601 )     240.4 %
 
                                                               
 
                                                               
Income from continuing operations before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle
    28,854       19,895       8,959       45.0 %     59,191       37,387       21,804       58.3 %
 
                                                               
Discontinued operations:
                                                               
Income from discontinued operations
    793       2,764       (1,971 )     (71.3 %)     2,452       6,002       (3,550 )     (59.1 %)
Gain on sale of real estate assets
    27,264       12,375       14,889       120.3 %     64,878       12,375       52,503       424.3 %
 
                                                               
Total discontinued operations       
    28,057       15,139       12,918       85.3 %     67,330       18,377       48,953       266.4 %
 
                                                               
 
                                                               
Income before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle
    56,911       35,034       21,877       62.4 %     126,521       55,764       70,757       126.9 %
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle
    —       —       —       —       —       4,547       (4,547 )     (100.0 %)
 
                                                               
 
                                                               
Net income
    56,911       35,034       21,877       62.4 %     126,521       60,311       66,210       109.8 %
Dividends attributable to preferred stock
    (2,175 )     (2,175 )     —       —       (4,350 )     (4,350 )     —       —  
 
                                                               
Net income available to common stockholders
  $ 54,736     $ 32,859     $ 21,877       66.6 %   $ 122,171     $ 55,961     $ 66,210       118.3 %
 
                                                               
Net income available to common stockholders increased $21,877,000, or 66.6%, to $54,736,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2005 and increased $66,210,000, or 118.3%, to $122,171,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2005. These increases are primarily attributable to gains on sales of assets in 2005, including the gain related to the sale of a technology investment, as well as increased net operating income from newly developed and acquired communities.
Net operating income (“NOI”) is considered by management to be an important and appropriate supplemental measure to net income of the operating performance of our communities because it helps both investors and management to understand the core operations of a community or communities prior to the allocation of any corporate-level or financing-related costs. NOI reflects the operating performance of a community, and allows for an easy comparison of the operating performance of individual assets or groups of assets. In addition, because prospective buyers of real estate have different financing and overhead structures, with varying marginal impacts to overhead by acquiring real estate, NOI is considered by many in the real estate industry to be a useful measure for determining the value of a real estate asset or group of assets. We define NOI as total property revenue less direct property operating expenses, including property taxes, and NOI excludes:
  •   corporate-level income (including management, development and other fees);
 
  •   corporate-level property management and other indirect operating expenses;
 
  •   investments and investment management costs;

28


 

  •   interest income and expense;
 
  •   general and administrative expense;
 
  •   equity in income of unconsolidated entities;
 
  •   minority interest in consolidated partnerships;
 
  •   venture partner interest in profit-sharing;
 
  •   depreciation expense;
 
  •   gain on sale of real estate assets;
 
  •   cumulative effect of change in accounting principle; and
 
  •   income from discontinued operations.
NOI does not represent cash generated from operating activities in accordance with GAAP. Therefore, NOI should not be considered an alternative to net income as an indication of our performance. NOI should also not be considered an alternative to net cash flow from operating activities, as determined by GAAP, as a measure of liquidity, nor is NOI necessarily indicative of cash available to fund cash needs. A calculation of NOI for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, along with a reconciliation to net income for each period, is as follows (dollars in thousands):
                                 
    For the three months ended   For the six months ended
    6-30-05   6-30-04   6-30-05   6-30-04
Net income
  $ 56,911     $ 35,034     $ 126,521     $ 60,311  
Corporate-level property management and other indirect operating expenses
    7,594       7,121       14,722       13,694  
Corporate-level other income
    (1,441 )     (206 )     (2,054 )     (747 )
Investments and investment management
    1,171       1,711       2,164       2,551  
Interest income
    (270 )     (36 )     (301 )     (56 )
Interest expense
    32,379       32,416       64,533       64,610  
General and administrative expense
    6,262       4,486       13,421       9,200  
Equity in income of unconsolidated entities
    (178 )     (276 )     (6,761 )     (463 )
Minority interest in consolidated partnerships
    337       408       851       250  
Venture partner interest in profit-sharing
    —       352       —       677  
Depreciation expense
    40,202       38,949       81,168       77,295  
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle
    —       —       —       (4,547 )
Gain on sale of real estate assets
    (27,264 )     (12,375 )     (64,878 )     (12,375 )
Income from discontinued operations
    (793 )     (2,764 )     (2,452 )     (6,002 )
 
                               
Net operating income
  $ 114,910     $ 104,820     $ 226,934     $ 204,398  
 
                               
The NOI increases of $10,090,000 and $22,536,000 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005, respectively, as compared to the prior year periods, consist of changes in the following categories (dollars in thousands):
                 
    For the three months ended   For the six months ended
    6-30-05   6-30-05
Established Communities
  $ 1,948     $ 4,689  
 
               
Other Stabilized Communities
    1,625       4,325  
 
               
Development and Redevelopment Communities
    6,517       13,522  
 
               
 
               
Total
  $ 10,090     $ 22,536  
 
               
The NOI increases in Established Communities were largely due to improved apartment market fundamentals. We maintained occupancy of approximately 95% in all regions during the six months ended June 30, 2005 and we saw the first year-over-year increase in rental rates in three years. We reached a transition point in drivers of rental rate growth, shifting from occupancy gains to increases in rental rates as the primary driver. We expect to continue to seek increases in rental rates to achieve revenue growth from our Established Communities for the remainder of 2005. We expect that the growth patterns will be higher during the second half of the year. In addition, we will continue to aggressively manage operating expenses, however we expect expenses to increase during the remainder of the year as compared to the expenditure level experienced during the six months ended June 30, 2005, due primarily to seasonality and timing, as discussed further below.

29


 

Rental and other income increased in the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 due to rental income generated from newly developed and acquired communities, as well as increased rental rates and occupancy for our Established Communities.
Overall Portfolio — The weighted average number of occupied apartment homes increased to 36,766 apartment homes for the six months ended June 30, 2005 as compared to 34,040 apartment homes for the six months ended June 30, 2004. This change is primarily the result of increased homes available from newly developed and acquired communities and an increase in the overall occupancy rate. The weighted average monthly revenue per occupied apartment home increased to $1,521 in the six months ended June 30, 2005 from $1,512 in the same period of 2004.
Established Communities — Rental revenue increased $3,092,000, or 2.7%, in the three months ended June 30, 2005 as compared to the same period of 2004. Rental revenue increased $5,670,000, or 2.5%, in the six months ended June 30, 2005 as compared to the same period of 2004. These increases are due to both increased rental rates and increased economic occupancy as compared to the same periods of 2004. For the six months ended June 30, 2005, the weighted average monthly revenue per occupied apartment home increased 1.6% to $1,486 compared to $1,463 for the same period in 2004, partially due to increased market rents. The average economic occupancy increased from 94.7% during the six months ended June 30, 2004 to 95.6% in the six months ended June 30, 2005. Economic occupancy takes into account the fact that apartment homes of different sizes and locations within a community have different economic impacts on a community’s gross revenue. Economic occupancy is defined as gross potential revenue less vacancy loss, as a percentage of gross potential revenue. Gross potential revenue is determined by valuing occupied homes at leased rates and vacant homes at market rents.
Although the magnitude of increases varied between regions, we experienced increases in Established Communities’ rental revenue in all six of our regions in the six months ended June 30, 2005 as compared to the same period of 2004. The largest increases in rental revenue on an absolute basis were in Southern California and the Northeast, with increases of 5.2% and 3.1%, respectively, between years.
The Northeast region accounted for approximately 35.1% of Established Community rental revenue during the six months ended June 30, 2005. The Northeast region appears to be stabilizing, as reflected in year-over-year rental revenue growth during the six months ended June 30, 2005. Economic occupancy increased 2.1% during the six months ended June 30, 2005, while average rental rates increased 1.0% to $1,872 from $1,854 in the same period of 2004. Although we expect pressure on rental rates to continue in the Northeast region, we expect continued year-over-year revenue growth in the Northeast during the remainder of 2005.
Northern California, which accounted for approximately 31.9% of Established Community rental revenue during the six months ended June 30, 2005, experienced an increase in rental revenue of 1.5% in the six months ended June 30, 2005 as compared to the same period of 2004. Economic occupancy in Northern California remained fairly stable, increasing 0.2% to 95.7% for the six months ended June 30, 2005, and average rental rates increased by 1.3% to $1,437 from $1,418 for the six months ended June 30, 2005. Although apartment fundamentals have been weak in certain areas of Northern California, particularly in San Jose, California, we expect continued year-over-year revenue growth in Northern California for the remainder of 2005.
In accordance with GAAP, cash concessions are amortized as an offset to rental revenue over the approximate lease term, which is generally one year. As a supplemental measure, we also present rental revenue with concessions stated on a cash basis to help investors evaluate the impact of both current and historical concessions on GAAP based rental revenue and to more readily enable comparisons to revenue as reported by other companies. Rental revenue with concessions stated on a cash basis also allows investors to understand historical trends in cash concessions, as well as current rental market conditions.

30


 

The following table reconciles total rental revenue in conformity with GAAP to total rental revenue adjusted to state concessions on a cash basis for our Established Communities for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 (dollars in thousands):
                                 
    For the three months ended   For the six months ended
    6-30-05   6-30-04   6-30-05   6-30-04
Rental revenue (GAAP basis)
  $ 118,352     $ 115,260     $ 234,930     $ 229,260  
Concessions amortized
    4,445       4,825       9,106       9,451  
Concessions granted
    (4,254 )     (5,042 )     (7,488 )     (8,938 )
 
                               
 
Rental revenue adjusted to state concessions on a cash basis
  $ 118,543     $ 115,043     $ 236,548     $ 229,773  
 
                               
 
Year-over-year % change — GAAP revenue
    2.7 %     n/a       2.5 %     n/a  
 
                               
Year-over-year % change — cash concession based revenue
    3.0 %     n/a       2.9 %     n/a  
Management, development and other fees increased in the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 as compared to the same periods of 2004 due to increased property management fees and the asset management fee earned from the management of the Fund, which was formed in March 2005.
Direct property operating expenses, excluding property taxes for all communities increased in the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 as compared to the same periods of 2004, primarily due to the addition of recently developed and acquired apartment homes, partially offset by cost containment over controllable expenses and the timing of certain expenditures in 2005.
For Established Communities, direct property operating expenses, excluding property taxes, decreased by $72,000 and $580,000 in the three and six months ended June 30, 2005, respectively, as compared to the same periods of 2004 due primarily to cost containment over controllable expenses and the timing of certain expenditures. We expect to experience increases in expenses during the remainder of 2005 as compared to the first half of the year, due to higher operating expenses typically experienced with seasonal turnover and the timing of controllable expenses not incurred in the first half of 2005, resulting in expense growth for the full year 2005 over 2004 consistent with growth levels in prior years.
Property taxes increased in the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 as compared to the same periods of 2004 due to overall higher assessments and the addition of newly developed and redeveloped apartment homes, as well as the size and timing of successful tax appeals in both years.
For Established Communities, property taxes increased by $1,218,000 and $1,560,000 in the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 as compared to the same periods of 2004, due to overall higher assessments throughout all regions, as well as the size and timing of successful tax appeals in both years. We expect property taxes to continue to increase in 2005 as compared to 2004 as local jurisdictions are expected to continue to seek additional revenue sources to offset budget deficits. However, property taxes may fluctuate due to the timing and size of successful tax appeals. We manage property tax increases internally, as well as engage third-party consultants, and appeal increases when appropriate.
Corporate-level property management and other indirect operating expenses increased in the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 as compared to the same periods of 2004 due to increased compensation costs.

31


 

Investments and investment management reflects the costs incurred related to investment acquisitions, investment management and abandoned pursuit costs, which include the abandonment or impairment of development pursuits, acquisition pursuits and technology investments. Investments and investment management decreased in the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 as compared to the same periods of 2004 due primarily to decreases in abandoned pursuit costs, partially offset by increased costs incurred in forming and managing the Fund. Abandoned pursuit costs were $146,000 and $366,000 in the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 and $936,000 and $1,177,000 in the three and six months ended June 30, 2004, respectively. Abandoned pursuit costs can be volatile, and the activity experienced in any given period may not be experienced in future years. We expect investments and investment management costs to increase during the remainder of 2005 as compared to the same periods of 2004 due to the costs associated with operating and managing the Fund, however, the level of abandoned pursuit costs incurred may impact this trend.
Depreciation expense increased in the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 as compared to the same periods of 2004 primarily due to the completion of development and redevelopment activities.
General and administrative expense (“G&A”) increased in the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 as compared to the same periods of 2004 as a result of higher compensation expenses and the accrual of costs related to various litigation matters in the amount of $1,500,000. In addition, G&A expense for the six months ended June 30, 2005 includes separation costs of approximately $2,100,000 recognized due to the departure of a senior executive. We expect G&A to continue to increase in 2005 as compared to 2004 due to increased corporate governance and compensation costs, but at a reduced pace as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2005.
Equity in income of unconsolidated entities increased for the six months ended June 30, 2005 primarily due to the gain recognized in the amount of $6,252,000 from the sale of our investment in Rent.com which was acquired in February 2005 by eBay.
Venture partner interest in profit-sharing during the three and six months ended June 30, 2004 represented the income allocated to our venture partner in a profit-sharing arrangement as discussed in Note 1, “Organization and Significant Accounting Policies,” of our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. Effective December 2004, we no longer account for our interest in this venture as a profit-sharing arrangement, and therefore during the three and six months ended June 30, 2005, no income or loss from venture partner interest in profit-sharing was recognized.
Minority interest in consolidated partnerships decreased in the six months ended June 30, 2005 as compared to the same period of 2004 due to the consolidation of an entity under FASB Interpretation No. 46 (“FIN 46”), “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, an Interpretation of ARB No. 51,” as revised in December 2003. Effective January 1, 2004, we consolidated an entity from which we held a participating mortgage note due to the implementation of FIN 46. (See Note 1, “Organization and Significant Accounting Policies,” of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements). We did not hold an equity interest in this entity, and therefore 100% of the entity’s net income or loss was recognized as minority interest in consolidated partnerships during the three and six months ended June 30, 2004. In October 2004, we received payment in full of the outstanding mortgage note due from this entity. Upon repayment of the mortgage note, our economic interest in this entity ended, and therefore this entity was no longer considered a variable interest entity under FIN 46 and we discontinued consolidation. During the three months ended June 30, 2005, the decrease related to the discontinued consolidation of this entity was offset by a decreased outside interest in certain consolidated partnerships by third parties.
Income from discontinued operations represents the net income generated by communities sold during the period from January 1, 2004 through June 30, 2005. The decrease in the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 as compared to the same periods of 2004 is due to the timing of the sale of three communities in 2005 and five communities in 2004.

32


 

Gain on sale of communities increased in the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 as compared to the same periods of 2004 as a result of larger gains on the three communities sold during 2005 as compared to the two communities sold in the six months ended June 30, 2004. The amount of gain realized depends on many factors, including the number of communities sold, the size and carrying value of those communities and the market conditions in the local area. We expect to continue to sell communities based on overall portfolio allocation needs as well as to respond to opportunities in the market to maximize risk adjusted returns.
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle in the six months ended June 30, 2004 is a result of the implementation of FIN 46, discussed above, and represents the difference between the net assets consolidated under FIN 46 and the previously recorded net assets.
Funds from Operations attributable to common stockholders (“FFO”) is considered by management to be an appropriate supplemental measure of our operating and financial performance because, by excluding gains or losses related to dispositions of previously depreciated property and excluding real estate depreciation, which can vary among owners of identical assets in similar condition based on historical cost accounting and useful life estimates, FFO can help one compare the operating performance of a real estate company between periods or as compared to different companies. We believe that in order to understand our operating results, FFO should be examined with net income as presented in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Other Comprehensive Income included elsewhere in this report.
Consistent with the definition adopted by the Board of Governors of the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trustsâ (“NAREIT”), we calculate FFO as net income or loss computed in accordance with GAAP, adjusted for:
  •   gains or losses on sales of previously depreciated operating communities;
 
  •   extraordinary gains or losses (as defined by GAAP);
 
  •   cumulative effect of change in accounting principle;
 
  •   depreciation of real estate assets; and
 
  •   adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures.
FFO does not represent net income in accordance with GAAP, and therefore it should not be considered an alternative to net income, which remains the primary measure, as an indication of our performance. In addition, FFO as calculated by other REITs may not be comparable to our calculation of FFO.
The following is a reconciliation of net income to FFO (dollars in thousands, except per share data):
                                 
    For the three months ended   For the six months ended
    6-30-05   6-30-04   6-30-05   6-30-04
Net income
  $ 56,911     $ 35,034     $ 126,521     $ 60,311  
Dividends attributable to preferred stock
    (2,175 )     (2,175 )     (4,350 )     (4,350 )
Depreciation — real estate assets, including discontinued operations and joint venture adjustments
    39,933       39,054       80,884       77,551  
Minority interest expense, including discontinued operations
    303       912       780       1,239  
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle
    —       —       —       (4,547 )
Gain on sale of operating communities
    (22,647 )     (12,375 )     (60,261 )     (12,375 )
 
                               
Funds from operations attributable to common stockholders
  $ 72,325     $ 60,450     $ 143,574     $ 117,829  
 
                               
 
                               
Weighted average common shares outstanding — diluted
    74,589,236       73,037,484       74,417,505       72,791,470  
EPS per common share — diluted
  $ 0.74     $ 0.46     $ 1.65     $ 0.79  
 
                               
FFO per common share — diluted
  $ 0.97     $ 0.83     $ 1.93     $ 1.62  
 
                               
FFO also does not represent cash generated from operating activities in accordance with GAAP, and therefore should not be considered an alternative to net cash flows from operating activities, as determined by GAAP, as a measure of liquidity. Additionally, it is not necessarily indicative of cash available to fund cash needs.

33


 

A presentation of GAAP based cash flow metrics is as follows (dollars in thousands) and a discussion of “Liquidity and Capital Resources” can be found below.
                                 
    For the three months ended   For the six months ended
    6-30-05   6-30-04   6-30-05   6-30-04
Net cash provided by operating activities
  $ 76,942     $ 85,192     $ 144,769     $ 135,909  
 
                               
Net cash used in investing activities
  $ (64,025 )   $ (107,417 )   $ (36,700 )   $ (162,424 )
 
                               
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
  $ (13,511 )   $ 24,380     $ (106,718 )   $ 21,851  
 
                               
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Factors affecting our liquidity and capital resources are our cash flows from operations, financing activities and investing activities. Operating cash flow has historically been determined by: (i) the number of apartment homes currently owned, (ii) rental rates, (iii) occupancy levels and (iv) operating expenses with respect to apartment homes. The timing, source and amount of cash flow provided by financing activities and used in investing activities are sensitive to the capital markets environment, particularly to changes in interest rates. The timing and type of capital markets activity in which we engage, as well as our plans for development, redevelopment, acquisition and disposition activity, are affected by changes in the capital markets environment, such as changes in interest rates or the availability of cost-effective capital.
We regularly review our liquidity needs, the adequacy of cash flow from operations, and other expected liquidity sources to meet these needs. We believe our principal short-term liquidity needs are to fund:
  •   normal recurring operating expenses;
 
  •   debt service and maturity payments;
 
  •   preferred stock dividends and DownREIT partnership unit distributions;
 
  •   the minimum dividend payments required to maintain our REIT qualification under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986;
 
  •   development and redevelopment activity in which we are currently engaged;
 
  •   opportunities for the acquisition of improved property; and
 
  •   capital calls for the Fund as required.
We anticipate that we can fully satisfy these needs from a combination of cash flow provided by operating activities, proceeds from asset dispositions and borrowing capacity under our variable rate unsecured credit facility.
Cash and cash equivalents totaled $2,877,000 at June 30, 2005, an increase of $1,351,000 from $1,526,000 on December 31, 2004. The following discussion relates to changes in cash due to operating, investing and financing activities, which are presented in our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows included elsewhere in this report.
Operating Activities — Net cash provided by operating activities increased to $144,769,000 in the six months ended June 30, 2005 from $135,909,000 in the six months ended June 30, 2004, primarily due to additional NOI from recently acquired and developed communities, partially offset by the loss of NOI from the eight communities sold since January 1, 2004, as discussed earlier in this report.
Investing Activities — Net cash used in investing activities of $36,700,000 in the six months ended June 30, 2005 related to investments in assets through development, redevelopment and acquisition of apartment communities, including the acquisition of a partner interest in a real estate joint venture, partially offset by proceeds from asset dispositions, including the proceeds from the sale of a technology investment. During the six months ended June 30, 2005, we invested $253,786,000 in the purchase and development of real estate and capital expenditures:
  •   We began the development of four new communities. These communities, if developed as expected, will contain a total of 792 apartment homes, and the total capitalized cost, including land acquisition costs, is projected to be approximately $247,200,000. We completed the development of three communities containing 867 apartment homes for a total capitalized cost, including land acquisition cost, of $130,200,000.

34


 

  •   We completed the redevelopment of one community containing 109 apartment homes for a total capitalized cost of $21,200,000, of which $17,300,000 was incurred prior to redevelopment.
 
  •   We acquired the 75% equity interest of a third-party partner in a joint venture owning one community for a net purchase price of $57,415,000.
 
  •   We contributed $6,278,000 for a 15.2% equity interest in the Fund, which upon contribution owned four apartment communities containing a total of 879 apartment homes with an aggregate gross real estate value of $112,852,000. We also received net proceeds of $87,948,000 as reimbursement for acquiring and warehousing these communities.
 
  •   We acquired nine parcels of land in connection with Development Rights, for an aggregate purchase price of $61,198,000.
 
  •   We had capital expenditures relating to current communities’ real estate assets of $7,960,000 and non-real estate capital expenditures of $946,000.
Financing Activities — Net cash used in financing activities totaled $106,718,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2005, consisting primarily of dividends paid, certain unsecured note repayments and mortgage note repayments, partially offset by an increase in borrowings under our unsecured credit facility, the issuance of common stock for option exercises and the issuance of unsecured notes. See Note 3, “Notes Payable, Unsecured Notes and Credit Facility,” and Note 4, “Stockholders’ Equity,” of our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, for additional information.
Variable Rate Unsecured Credit Facility
We have a $500,000,000 revolving variable rate unsecured credit facility with JPMorgan Chase Bank and Wachovia Bank, N.A. serving as banks and syndication agents for a syndicate of commercial banks. Under the terms of the credit facility, if we elect to increase the facility by up to an additional $150,000,000, and one or more banks (from the syndicate or otherwise) voluntarily agree to provide the additional commitment, then we will be able to increase the facility up to $650,000,000, and no member of the syndicate of banks can prohibit such increase; such an increase in the facility will only be effective to the extent banks (from the syndicate or otherwise) choose to commit to lend additional funds. We pay participating banks, in the aggregate, an annual facility fee of approximately $750,000 in quarterly installments. The unsecured credit facility bears interest at varying levels based on the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”), rating levels achieved on our unsecured notes and on a maturity schedule selected by us. The current stated pricing is LIBOR plus 0.55% per annum (4.07% on July 29, 2005). The spread over LIBOR can vary from LIBOR plus 0.50% to LIBOR plus 1.15% based upon the rating of our long-term unsecured debt. In addition, a competitive bid option is available for borrowings of up to $250,000,000. This option allows banks that are part of the lender consortium to bid to provide us loans at a rate that is lower than the stated pricing provided by the unsecured credit facility. The competitive bid option may result in lower pricing if market conditions allow. We had $125,000,000 outstanding under this competitive bid option at July 29, 2005 priced at LIBOR plus 0.29%, or 3.59%. We are subject to (i) certain customary covenants under the unsecured credit facility, including, but not limited to, maintaining certain maximum leverage ratios, a minimum fixed charges coverage ratio and minimum unencumbered assets and equity levels, and (ii) prohibitions on paying dividends in amounts that exceed 95% of our FFO, except as may be required to maintain our REIT status. The credit facility matures in May 2008, assuming our exercise of a one-year renewal option. At July 29, 2005, $165,300,000 was outstanding, $28,765,000 was used to provide letters of credit and $305,935,000 was available for borrowing under the unsecured credit facility.
Future Financing and Capital Needs — Debt Maturities
One of our principal long-term liquidity needs is the repayment of long-term debt at the time that such debt matures. For unsecured notes, we anticipate that no significant portion of the principal of these notes will be repaid prior to maturity. If we do not have funds on hand sufficient to repay our indebtedness as it becomes due, it will be necessary for us to refinance the debt. This refinancing may be accomplished by

35


 

uncollateralized private or public debt offerings, additional debt financing that is collateralized by mortgages on individual communities or groups of communities, draws on our unsecured credit facility or by additional equity offerings. Although we believe we will have the capacity to meet our long-term liquidity needs, we cannot assure you that additional debt financing or debt or equity offerings will be available or, if available, that they will be on terms we consider satisfactory.
The following debt activity occurred during the six months ended June 30, 2005:
  •   We repaid $150,000,000 in previously issued unsecured notes in January 2005, along with any unpaid interest, pursuant to their scheduled maturity. No prepayment penalty was incurred;
 
  •   We issued $100,000,000 in unsecured notes in March 2005 under our existing shelf registration statement at an annual effective interest rate of 4.999%. Interest on these notes is payable semi-annually on March 15 and September 15, and they mature in March 2013;
 
  •   In connection with the admission of outside investors into the Fund, we deconsolidated the assets and liabilities of four communities owned by the Fund, including $24,869,000 in fixed rate mortgage debt secured by two of the communities;
 
  •   We made a payment in the amount of $36,142,000 to the third-party lender of a joint venture entity that was unconsolidated at December 31, 2004 but was consolidated in March 2005 upon acquisition of the 75% equity interest of the third-party partner; and
 
  •   We assumed $4,566,000 in fixed rate debt in connection with the acquisition of a parcel of improved land.

36


 

The table below details debt maturities for the next five years, excluding our unsecured credit facility, for debt outstanding at June 30, 2005 (dollars in thousands).
    All-In   Principal          
    interest   maturity     Balance outstanding   Scheduled maturities
Community   rate (1)   date   12-31-04   6-30-05     2005   2006   2007   2008   2009   Thereafter
Tax-exempt bonds
                                                                                 
Fixed rate
                                                                                 
CountryBrook
    6.30 %   Mar-2012   $ 17,145     $ 16,870       $ 284     $ 596     $ 634     $ 676     $ 719     $ 13,961  
Avalon at Symphony Glen
    4.90 %   Jul-2024     9,780       9,780         —       —       —       —       —       9,780  
Avalon View
    7.55 %   Aug-2024     16,920       16,700         235       485       518       555       595       14,312  
Avalon at Lexington
    6.55 %   Feb-2025     13,151       12,980         176       368       391       415       441       11,189  
Avalon at Nob Hill
    5.80 %   Jun-2025     18,847       18,673   (2)     178       378       405       435       466       16,811  
Avalon Campbell
    6.48 %   Jun-2025     34,395       34,011   (2)     397       838       898       963       1,033       29,882  
Avalon Pacifica
    6.48 %   Jun-2025     15,602       15,428   (2)     180       380       408       437       469       13,554  
Avalon Knoll
    6.95 %   Jun-2026     12,502       12,373         134       282       302       324       347       10,984  
Avalon Landing
    6.85 %   Jun-2026     6,177       6,112         67       142       152       162       173       5,416  
Avalon Fields
    7.55 %   May-2027     10,912       10,810         104       222       239       256       275       9,714  
Avalon West
    7.73 %   Dec-2036     8,327       8,290         39       80       85       91       98       7,897  
Avalon Oaks
    7.45 %   Jul-2041     17,426       17,371         57       120       128       138       147       16,781  
Avalon Oaks West
    7.48 %   Apr-2043     17,239       17,189         52       110       117       125       134       16,651  
 
                                                                                 
 
                    198,423       196,587         1,903       4,001       4,277       4,577       4,897       176,932  
 
                                                                                 
Variable rate (3)
                                                                                 
The Promenade
    4.18 %   Oct-2010     32,663       32,387         286       605       652       701       755       29,388  
Waterford
    3.02 %   Jul-2014     33,100       33,100   (4)     —       —       —       —       —       33,100  
Avalon at Mountain View
    3.02 %   Feb-2017     18,300       18,300   (4)     —       —       —       —       —       18,300  
Avalon at Foxchase I
    3.02 %   Nov-2017     16,800       16,800   (4)     —       —       —       —       —       16,800  
Avalon at Foxchase II
    3.02 %   Nov-2017     9,600       9,600   (4)     —       —       —       —       —       9,600  
Avalon at Mission Viejo
    3.35 %   Jun-2025     6,928       6,865   (4)     64       138       148       159       170       6,186  
Avalon at Fairway Hills I
    3.28 %   Jun-2026     11,500       11,500         —       —       —       —       —       11,500  
 
                                                                                 
 
                    128,891       128,552         350       743       800       860       925       124,874  
 
                                                                                 
Conventional loans (5)
                                                                                 
Fixed rate
                                                                                 
$100 million unsecured notes
    6.75 %   Jan-2005     100,000       —         —       —       —       —       —       —  
$50 million unsecured notes
    6.50 %   Jan-2005     50,000       —         —       —       —       —       —       —  
$150 million unsecured notes
    6.93 %   Jul-2006     150,000       150,000         —       150,000       —       —       —       —  
$150 million unsecured notes
    5.18 %   Aug-2007     150,000       150,000         —       —       150,000       —       —       —  
$110 million unsecured notes
    7.13 %   Dec-2007     110,000       110,000         —       —       110,000       —       —       —  
$50 million unsecured notes
    6.63 %   Jan-2008     50,000       50,000         —       —       —       50,000       —       —  
$150 million unsecured notes
    8.37 %   Jul-2008     150,000       150,000         —       —       —       150,000       —       —  
$150 million unsecured notes
    7.63 %   Aug-2009     150,000       150,000         —       —       —       —       150,000       —  
$200 million unsecured notes
    7.67 %   Dec-2010     200,000       200,000         —       —       —       —       —       200,000  
$300 million unsecured notes
    6.79 %   Sep-2011     300,000       300,000         —       —       —       —       —       300,000  
$50 million unsecured notes
    6.31 %   Sep-2011     50,000       50,000         —       —       —       —       —       50,000  
$250 million unsecured notes
    6.26 %   Nov-2012     250,000       250,000         —       —       —       —       —       250,000  
$150 million unsecured notes
    5.52 %   Apr-2014     150,000       150,000         —       —       —       —       —       150,000  
$100 million unsecured notes
    5.11 %   Mar-2013     —       100,000         —       —       —       —       —       100,000  
Wheaton Development Right
    6.99 %   Oct-2008     4,660       4,625         35       76       82       4,432       —       —  
4600 Eisenhower Avenue
    8.08 %   Apr-2009     —       4,551         54       102       110       119       4,166          
Twinbrook Development Right
    7.25 %   Oct-2011     8,545       8,464         75       168       182       194       211       7,634  
Avalon Redondo Beach (6)
    4.84 %   Oct-2011     16,765       —         —       —       —       —       —       —  
Briarcliffe Lakeside (6)
    6.90 %   Feb-2028     8,104       —         —       —       —       —       —       —  
Avalon at Tysons West
    5.55 %   Jul-2028     6,819       6,750         69       146       155       162       173       6,045  
Avalon Orchards
    7.65 %   Jul-2033     20,353       20,236         121       254       272       292       313       18,984  
 
                                                                                 
 
                    1,925,246       1,854,626         354       150,746       260,801       205,199       154,863       1,082,663  
 
                                                                                 
Variable rate (3)
                                                                                 
Avalon Del Rey
    3.73 %   Sep-2007     6,278       22,874         —       —       22,874       —       —       —  
Avalon Ledges
    4.59 %   May-2009     19,674       19,580   (4)     489       616       651       688       17,136       —  
Avalon at Flanders Hill
    4.59 %   May-2009     22,429       22,270   (4)     506       703       742       784       19,535       —  
Avalon at Newton Highlands
    4.53 %   May-2009     39,902       39,610   (4)     912       1,265       1,329       1,397       34,707       —  
 
                                                                                 
 
                    88,283       104,334         1,907       2,584       25,596       2,869       71,378       —  
 
                                                                                 
Total indebtedness — excluding unsecured credit facility
                  $ 2,340,843     $ 2,284,099       $ 4,514     $ 158,074     $ 291,474     $ 213,505     $ 232,063     $ 1,384,469  
 
                                                                                 

(1)   Includes credit enhancement fees, facility fees, trustees’ fees and other fees.
 
(2)   Financed by variable rate, tax-exempt debt, but interest rate is effectively fixed at June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004 at the rate indicated through a swap agreement.
 
(3)   Variable rates are given as of June 30, 2005.
 
(4)   Financed by variable rate debt, but interest rate is capped through an interest rate protection agreement.
 
(5)   Balances outstanding do not include $850 and $552 of debt discount as of June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively, reflected in unsecured notes on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets included elsewhere in this report.
 
(6)   This community was deconsolidated in March 2005 upon the admission of outside investors into the Fund.

37


 

Future Financing and Capital Needs — Portfolio and Other Activity
As of June 30, 2005, we had eleven new communities under construction, for which a total estimated cost of $151,402,000 remained to be invested. In addition, we had four communities under reconstruction, for which a total estimated cost of $7,301,000 remained to be invested. Substantially all of the capital expenditures necessary to complete the communities currently under construction and reconstruction, as well as development costs related to pursuing Development Rights, will be funded from:
  •   the remaining capacity under our current $500,000,000 unsecured credit facility;
 
  •   the net proceeds from sales of existing communities;
 
  •   retained operating cash;
 
  •   the issuance of debt or equity securities; and/or
 
  •   private equity funding.
Before planned reconstruction activity, including reconstruction activity related to the Fund as discussed below, or the construction of a Development Right begins, we intend to arrange adequate financing to complete these undertakings, although we cannot assure you that we will be able to obtain such financing. In the event that financing cannot be obtained, we may have to abandon Development Rights, write-off associated pre-development costs that were capitalized and/or forego reconstruction activity. In such instances, we will not realize the increased revenues and earnings that we expected from such Development Rights or reconstruction activity and significant losses could be incurred.
We have invested in the Fund, a private, discretionary investment vehicle, which will acquire and operate apartment communities in our markets. The Fund will serve, until March 16, 2008 or until 80% of its committed capital is invested, as the exclusive vehicle through which we will acquire apartment communities, subject to certain exceptions. These exceptions include significant individual asset and portfolio acquisitions, properties acquired in tax-deferred transactions and acquisitions that are inadvisable or inappropriate for the Fund, if any. The Fund will not restrict our development activities, and will terminate after a term of eight years, subject to two one-year extensions. The Fund has nine institutional investors, including us, with combined capital commitments of $330,000,000. A significant portion of the investments made in the Fund by its investors are being made through AvalonBay Value Added Fund, Inc., a Maryland corporation that will qualify as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code (the “Fund REIT”). A wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company is the general partner of the Fund and has committed $50,000,000 to the Fund and the Fund REIT, representing a 15.2% combined general partner and limited partner equity interest. We expect the Fund to have the ability to employ leverage through debt financings up to 65% on a portfolio basis, which would enable the Fund to invest up to $940,000,000.
We have also recently increased our use of joint ventures to hold individual real estate assets, pursuant to which certain developments will be held upon completion through partnership vehicles. We generally employ joint ventures primarily to mitigate asset concentration or market risk and secondarily as a source of liquidity. Each joint venture or partnership agreement has been and will continue to be individually negotiated, and our ability to operate and/or dispose of a community in our sole discretion may be limited to varying degrees depending on the terms of the joint venture or partnership agreement. However, we cannot assure you that we will continue to enter into joint ventures in the future, or that, if we do, we will achieve our objectives.
In evaluating our allocation of capital within our markets, we sell assets that do not meet our long-term investment criteria or when capital and real estate markets allow us to realize a portion of the value created over the past business cycle and redeploy the proceeds from those sales to develop and redevelop communities. In response to real estate and capital markets conditions, including strong institutional demand for product in our markets and demand from condominium converters, we sold three communities with net proceeds in the aggregate of $114,942,000 in the six months ended June 30, 2005, and anticipate selling additional communities later this year. However, we cannot assure you that assets can continue to be sold on terms that we consider satisfactory or that market conditions will continue to make the sale of assets an appealing strategy. Because the proceeds from the sale of communities may not be immediately

38


 

redeployed into revenue generating assets, the immediate effect of a sale of a community for a gain is to increase net income, but reduce future total revenues, total expenses, NOI and FFO. As of July 29, 2005, we have seven communities classified as held for sale under GAAP. We are actively pursuing the disposition of these communities and expect to close on six of these dispositions in 2005. However, we cannot assure you that these communities will be sold as planned.
Off Balance Sheet Arrangements
We own interests in unconsolidated real estate entities, with ownership interests up to 50%. Three of these unconsolidated real estate entities, Avalon Terrace, LLC, CVP I, LLC and the Fund, have debt outstanding as of June 30, 2005 as follows:
  •   Avalon Terrace, LLC has $22,500,000 of variable rate debt which matures in November 2005 and is payable by the unconsolidated real estate entity with operating cash flow from the underlying real estate. We have not guaranteed the debt on Avalon Terrace, LLC, nor do we have any obligation to fund this debt should the unconsolidated real estate entity be unable to do so.
 
  •   CVP I, LLC has a construction loan in the amount of $117,000,000 which matures in February 2009, assuming exercise of two one-year renewal options, and is payable by the unconsolidated real estate entity. In connection with the general contractor services that we provide to CVP I, LLC, the entity that owns and is developing Avalon Chrystie Place I, we have provided a construction completion guarantee to the lender in order to fulfill their standard financing requirements related to the construction financing. Our obligations under this guarantee will terminate following construction completion once all of the lender’s standard completion requirements have been satisfied. We currently expect this to occur in 2006.
 
  •   The Fund has four mortgage loans in the amounts of $16,765,000, $16,575,000, $31,500,000 and $8,037,000, which mature in October 2011, April 2012, July 2012 and February 2028 (but can be prepaid after February 2008 without penalty), respectively. These mortgage loans are secured by the underlying real estate. In addition, the Fund has a permanent credit facility with $29,300,000 outstanding as of June 30, 2005, which matures in January 2008. The mortgage loans and the credit facility are payable by the Fund with operating cash flow from the underlying real estate, and the credit facility is secured by capital commitments. We have not guaranteed the debt of the Fund, nor do we have any obligation to fund this debt should the Fund be unable to do so.
In addition, as part of the formation of the Fund, we have provided to one of the limited partners a guarantee as follows. If, upon final liquidation of the Fund, the total amount of all distributions to that partner during the life of the Fund (whether from operating cash flow or property sales) does not equal the total capital contributions made by that partner, then we will pay the partner an amount equal to the shortfall, but in no event more than 10% of the total capital contributions made by the partner. We have not recorded a liability related to this guarantee as of June 30, 2005, as the fair value of the real estate assets owned by the Fund is considered adequate to cover such payment under a liquidation scenario. There are no other lines of credit, side agreements, financial guarantees or any other derivative financial instruments related to or between us and our unconsolidated real estate entities. In evaluating our capital structure and overall leverage, management takes into consideration our proportionate share of this unconsolidated debt. For more information regarding the operations of our unconsolidated entities see Note 6, “Investments in Unconsolidated Entities,” of our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
Contractual Obligations
We currently have contractual obligations consisting primarily of long-term debt obligations and lease obligations for certain land parcels and office space. There have not been any material changes outside the ordinary course of business to our contractual obligations during the six months ended June 30, 2005.

39


 

Development Communities
As of June 30, 2005, we had eleven Development Communities under construction. We expect these Development Communities, when completed, to add a total of 2,593 apartment homes to our portfolio for a total capitalized cost, including land acquisition costs, of approximately $665,000,000. Statements regarding the future development or performance of the Development Communities are forward-looking statements. We cannot assure you that:
  •   we will complete the Development Communities;
 
  •   our budgeted costs or estimates of occupancy rates will be realized;
 
  •   our schedule of leasing start dates, construction completion dates or stabilization dates will be achieved; or
 
  •   future developments will realize returns comparable to our past developments.
     You should carefully review the discussion under “Risks of Development and Redevelopment” included elsewhere in this report.

40


 

The following table presents a summary of the Development Communities. We hold a direct or indirect fee simple ownership interest in these communities except where noted.
                                                 
            Total                
    Number of   capitalized                
    apartment   cost (1)   Construction   Initial   Estimated   Estimated
    homes   ($ millions)   start   occupancy (2)   completion   stabilization (3)
  1. Avalon Chrystie Place I (4)
  New York, NY
    361     $ 150.0       Q4 2003       Q2 2005       Q4 2005       Q2 2006  
  2. Avalon Pines I
  Coram, NY
    298       48.7       Q4 2003       Q4 2004       Q3 2005       Q1 2006  
  3. Avalon Danbury
  Danbury, CT
    234       35.6       Q1 2004       Q1 2005       Q4 2005       Q2 2006  
  4. Avalon Del Rey (5)
  Los Angeles, CA
    309       70.0       Q2 2004       Q3 2005       Q1 2006       Q3 2006  
  5. Avalon at Juanita Village (6)
  Kirkland, WA
    211       45.5       Q2 2004       Q2 2005       Q4 2005       Q2 2006  
  6. Avalon Camarillo
  Camarillo, CA
    249       42.7       Q2 2004       Q4 2005       Q1 2006       Q3 2006  
  7. Avalon at Bedford Center
  Bedford, MA
    139       25.3       Q4 2004       Q4 2005       Q2 2006       Q4 2006  
  8. Avalon Wilshire
  Los Angeles, CA
    123       42.0       Q1 2005       Q4 2006       Q1 2007       Q3 2007  
  9. Avalon at Mission Bay North II (7)
  San Francisco, CA
    313       118.0       Q1 2005       Q4 2006       Q2 2007       Q4 2007  
10. Avalon Pines II
  Coram, NY
    152       26.6       Q2 2005       Q2 2006       Q3 2006       Q1 2007  
11. Avalon Chestnut Hill
  Chestnut Hill, MA
    204       60.6       Q2 2005       Q4 2006       Q1 2007       Q3 2007  
 
                                               
 
                                               
Total
    2,593     $ 665.0                                  
 
                                               

(1)   Total capitalized cost includes all capitalized costs projected to be or actually incurred to develop the respective Development Community, determined in accordance with GAAP, including land acquisition costs, construction costs, real estate taxes, capitalized interest and loan fees, permits, professional fees, allocated development overhead and other regulatory fees. Total capitalized cost for communities identified as having joint venture ownership, either during construction or upon construction completion, represents the total projected joint venture contribution amount.
 
(2)   Future initial occupancy dates are estimates.
 
(3)   Stabilized operations is defined as the earlier of (i) attainment of 95% or greater physical occupancy or (ii) the one-year anniversary of completion of development.
 
(4)   This community is being financed under a joint venture structure with third-party financing, in which the community is owned by a limited liability company managed by one of our wholly-owned subsidiaries. We currently hold a 20% equity interest in this joint venture. The total capitalized cost for this community includes costs associated with the construction of 89,000 square feet of retail space and 30,000 square feet for a community facility. Our portion of the total capitalized cost of this joint venture is projected to be $30,000,000 including community-based tax-exempt debt.
 
(5)   This community is currently owned by one of our wholly-owned subsidiaries, is financed, in part, by a construction loan, and is subject to a joint venture agreement that allows for a 70% joint venture partner to be admitted upon construction completion.
 
(6)   This community is being developed by one of our wholly-owned, taxable REIT subsidiaries, and is subject to a venture agreement that provides for the transfer of 100% of the ownership interests to the joint venture upon construction completion. We will not retain an equity interest (only a residual profits interest) in this joint venture.
 
(7)   This community is being developed under a joint venture structure. We hold a 25% equity interest in this joint venture and we anticipate that approximately 80% of the total capitalized cost will be financed through a construction loan. Our portion of the total capitalized cost of this joint venture is projected to be $29,500,000 including community-based debt.

41


 

Redevelopment Communities
As of June 30, 2005, we had four communities under redevelopment. We expect the total capitalized cost to complete these communities, including the cost of acquisition, capital expenditures subsequent to acquisition and redevelopment, to be approximately $237,200,000, of which approximately $40,000,000 is the additional capital invested or expected to be invested during redevelopment and $197,200,000 was incurred prior to redevelopment. Statements regarding the future redevelopment or performance of the Redevelopment Communities are forward-looking statements. We have found that the cost to redevelop an existing apartment community is more difficult to budget and estimate than the cost to develop a new community. Accordingly, we expect that actual costs may vary from our budget by a wider range than for a new development community. We cannot assure you that we will meet our schedule for reconstruction completion or restabilized operations, or that we will meet our budgeted costs, either individually or in the aggregate. See the discussion under “Risks of Development and Redevelopment” included elsewhere in this report.
The following presents a summary of these Redevelopment Communities:
                                                 
            Total cost                
    Number of   ($ millions)           Estimated   Estimated
    apartment   Pre-redevelopment   Total capitalized   Reconstruction   reconstruction   restabilized
    homes   cost   cost (1)   start   completion   operations (2)
1. Avalon at Prudential Center
Boston, MA
    781     $ 133.9     $ 160.0       Q4 2000       Q2 2006       Q4 2006  
2. Avalon at Fairway Hills III
Columbia, MD
    336       23.3       29.4       Q4 2004       Q2 2006       Q4 2006  
3. Avalon Lakeside (3)
Wheaton, IL
    204       14.5       18.4       Q4 2004       Q1 2006       Q3 2006  
4. Hobbits Grove (3)
Columbia, MD
    170       25.5       29.4       Q2 2005       Q2 2006       Q4 2006  
 
                                               
 
Total
    1,491     $ 197.2     $ 237.2                          
 
                                               

(1)   Total capitalized cost includes all capitalized costs projected to be incurred to redevelop the respective Redevelopment Community, including costs to acquire the community, reconstruction costs, real estate taxes, capitalized interest and loan fees, permits, professional fees, allocated redevelopment overhead and other regulatory fees determined in accordance with GAAP.
 
(2)   Restabilized operations is defined as the earlier of (i) attainment of 95% or greater physical occupancy or (ii) the one-year anniversary of completion of redevelopment.
 
(3)   This community was acquired in 2004 by the Fund, which we wholly-owned until the admission of outside investors during the six months ended June 30, 2005, reducing our ownership in this community and the Fund to 15.2%.
Development Rights
As of June 30, 2005, we are evaluating the future development of 46 new apartment communities on land that is either owned by us, under contract, subject to a leasehold interest or for which we hold a purchase option. We prefer to hold Development Rights through options to acquire land, although for twenty of the Development Rights we currently own the land on which a community would be built if we proceeded with development. The Development Rights range from those beginning design and architectural planning to those that have completed site plans and drawings and can begin construction almost immediately. We estimate that the successful completion of all of these communities would ultimately add 12,216 apartment homes to our portfolio. Substantially all of these apartment homes will offer features like those offered by the communities we currently own. At June 30, 2005, there were cumulative capitalized costs (including legal fees, design fees and related overhead costs, but excluding land costs) of $38,777,000 relating to Development Rights that we consider probable for future development. In addition, land costs related to the pursuit of Development Rights (consisting of original land and additional carrying costs) of $211,119,000 are reflected as land held for development on the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of June 30, 2005.

42


 

The properties comprising the Development Rights are in different stages of the due diligence and regulatory approval process. The decisions as to which of the Development Rights to invest in, if any, or to continue to pursue once an investment in a Development Right is made, are business judgments that we make after we perform financial, demographic and other analyses. In the event that we do not proceed with a Development Right, we generally would not recover capitalized costs incurred in the pursuit of those communities, unless we were to recover amounts in connection with the sale of land; however, we cannot guarantee a recovery. Pre-development costs incurred in the pursuit of Development Rights for which future development is not yet considered probable are expensed as incurred. In addition, if the status of a Development Right changes, deeming future development no longer probable, any capitalized pre-development costs are written-off with a charge to expense.
Although the development of any particular Development Right cannot be assured, we believe that the Development Rights, in the aggregate, present attractive potential opportunities for future development and growth of long-term stockholder value.
Statements regarding the future development of the Development Rights are forward-looking statements. We cannot assure you that:
  •   we will succeed in obtaining zoning and other necessary governmental approvals or the financing required to develop these communities, or that we will decide to develop any particular community; or
 
  •   if we undertake construction of any particular community, that we will complete construction at the total capitalized cost assumed in the financial projections in the following table.

43


 

The table below presents a summary of the 46 Development Rights we are currently pursuing:
                         
                    Total
            Estimated   capitalized
            number   cost
Location           of homes   ($ millions) (1)
  1. Rockville, MD Phase II
    (2 )     196     $ 30  
  2. Lyndhurst, NJ
    (2 )     328       81  
  3. Long Island City, NY Phase II
            602       176  
  4. New York, NY Phase II
    (2 )     205       98  
  5. Shrewsbury, MA
            251       40  
  6. Dublin, CA Phase I
    (2 )     305       76  
  7. Danvers, MA
            428       80  
  8. Glen Cove, NY
    (2 )     111       37  
  9. New Rochelle, NY Phase II
            588       165  
10. Encino, CA
    (2 )     131       51  
11. Woburn, MA
            446       84  
12. Wilton, CT
    (2 )     100       24  
13. Bellevue, WA
            368       81  
14. Shelton, CT Phase II
            171       34  
15. Canoga Park, CA
            209       47  
16. New York, NY Phase III
    (2 )     96       56  
17. Kirkland, WA Phase II
    (2 )     173       48  
18. Union City, CA Phase I
    (2 )(3)     230       58  
19. Union City, CA Phase II
    (2 )(3)     209       54  
20. Hingham, MA
            236       44  
21. Irvine, CA
            290       63  
22. Lexington, MA
            387       76  
23. Norwalk, CT
            312       63  
24. Cohasset, MA
            200       38  
25. White Plains, NY
            407       138  
26. Andover, MA
    (2 )     115       21  
27. Quincy, MA
    (2 )     146       24  
28. Plymouth, MA Phase II
            69       13  
29. Tinton Falls, NJ
            298       51  
30. West Haven, CT
            170       23  
31. Greenburgh, NY Phase II
            444       112  
32. Sharon, MA
            156       26  
33. Oyster Bay, NY
            273       69  
34. Dublin, CA Phase II
            200       52  
35. Dublin, CA Phase III
            205       53  
36. Milford, CT
    (2 )     284       45  
37. Wheaton, MD
    (2 )(3)     320       56  
38. Alexandria, VA
    (2 )(3)     282       56  
39. Stratford, CT
    (2 )     146       23  
40. Plainview, NY
            220       47  
41. Yaphank, NY
    (2 )     298       57  
42. Camarillo, CA
            376       55  
43. Gaithersburg, MD
            254       41  
44. Shelton, CT
            302       49  
45. Tysons Corner, VA
    (2 )(3)     439       101  
46. Rockville, MD
    (2 )(3)     240       46  
 
                       
 
                       
Total
            12,216     $ 2,762  
 
                       

(1)   Total capitalized cost includes all capitalized costs incurred to date (if any) and projected to be incurred to develop the respective community, determined in accordance with GAAP, including land acquisition costs, construction costs, real estate taxes, capitalized interest and loan fees, permits, professional fees, allocated development overhead and other regulatory fees.
 
(2)   We own the land parcel, but construction has not yet begun.
 
(3)   Represents improved land, four of which are encumbered with debt. The improved land consists of occupied office buildings and industrial space. NOI from incidental operations from the current improvements will be recorded as a reduction in cost basis as described in the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this report.

44


 

Risks of Development and Redevelopment
We intend to continue to pursue the development and redevelopment of apartment home communities. Our development and redevelopment activities may be exposed to the following:
  •   we may abandon opportunities we have already begun to explore based on further review of, or changes in, financial, demographic, environmental or other factors;
 
  •   we may encounter liquidity constraints, including the unavailability of financing on favorable terms for the development or redevelopment of a community;
 
  •   we may be unable to obtain, or we may experience delays in obtaining, all necessary zoning, land-use, building, occupancy, and other required governmental permits and authorizations;
 
  •   we may incur construction or reconstruction costs for a community that exceed our original estimates due to increased materials, labor or other expenses, which could make completion of development or redevelopment of the community uneconomical;
 
  •   occupancy rates and rents at a newly completed development or redevelopment community may fluctuate depending on a number of factors, including competition and market and general economic conditions, and may not be sufficient to make the community profitable;
 
  •   we may be unable to complete construction and lease-up on schedule, resulting in increased debt service expense and construction costs; and
 
  •   we may be unable to identify or obtain land for development at attractive prices which could reduce our future earnings potential.
The occurrence of any of the events described above could adversely affect results of operations and our payment of distributions to our stockholders.
Construction costs are projected by us based on market conditions prevailing in the community’s market at the time our budgets are prepared and reflect changes to those market conditions that we anticipated at that time. Although we attempt to anticipate changes in market conditions, we cannot predict those changes with certainty. Construction costs have been increasing, particularly for materials such as steel, concrete and lumber, and, for some of our Development Communities and Development Rights, the total construction costs may be higher than the original budget. We do not expect that these price increases will materially affect our current Development Communities. However, these increases may materially affect Development Rights where construction has not yet begun. Total capitalized cost includes all capitalized costs projected to be incurred to develop the respective Development or Redevelopment Community, determined in accordance with GAAP, including:
  •   land and/or property acquisition costs;
 
  •   construction or reconstruction costs;
 
  •   real estate taxes;
 
  •   capitalized interest;
 
  •   loan fees;
 
  •   permits;
 
  •   professional fees;
 
  •   allocated development or redevelopment overhead; and
 
  •   other regulatory fees.
Costs to redevelop communities that have been acquired have, in some cases, exceeded our original estimates and similar increases in costs may be experienced in the future. We cannot assure you that market rents in effect at the time new development communities or redevelopment communities complete lease-up will be sufficient to fully offset the effects of any increased construction or reconstruction costs.
Insurance and Risk of Uninsured Losses
We carry commercial general liability insurance and property insurance with respect to all of our communities. These policies, and other insurance policies we carry, have policy specifications, insured limits and deductibles

45


 

that we consider commercially reasonable. There are, however, certain types of losses (such as losses arising from acts of war) that are not insured, in full or in part, because they are either uninsurable or the cost of insurance makes it, in management’s view, economically impractical. If an uninsured property loss or a property loss in excess of insured limits were to occur, we could lose our capital invested in a community, as well as the anticipated future revenues from such community. We would also continue to be obligated to repay any mortgage indebtedness or other obligations related to the community. If an uninsured liability to a third-party were to occur, we would incur the cost of defense and settlement with, or court ordered damages to, that third-party. A significant uninsured property or liability loss could materially and adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
Many of our West Coast communities are located in the general vicinity of active earthquake faults. A large concentration of our communities lie near, and thus are susceptible to, the major fault lines in California, including the San Andreas fault and the Hayward fault. We cannot assure you that an earthquake would not cause damage or losses greater than insured levels. In June 2004, we renewed our earthquake insurance. We have in place with respect to communities located in California, for any single occurrence and in the aggregate, $75,000,000 of coverage with a deductible per building equal to five percent of the insured value of that building. The five percent deductible is subject to a minimum of $100,000 per occurrence. Earthquake coverage outside of California is subject to a $200,000,000 limit, except with respect to the state of Washington, for which the limit is $65,000,000. Our earthquake insurance outside of California provides for a $100,000 deductible per occurrence. In addition, up to a policy aggregate of $3,000,000, the next $400,000 of loss per occurrence outside California will be treated as an additional deductible.
Our annual general liability policy and workman’s compensation coverage was renewed on August 1, 2005 and the insurance coverage provided for in these renewal policies did not materially change from the preceding year. Including the costs we estimate that we may incur as a result of deductibles, we expect the cost related to these insurance categories for the policy period from August 1, 2005 to July 31, 2006 to decrease 5% to 7% as compared to the prior period.
Our property insurance policy was scheduled to renew on December 1, 2005; however, in an effort to capitalize on declining insurance rates we elected to extend the first $15,000,000 layer of the policy by five months, thereby changing the renewal date for this layer to May 1, 2006. The remaining layers are currently scheduled to renew on December 1, 2005. We are currently in negotiations with all carriers to align the renewal dates. Based on this policy extension, we have seen a decline in insurance premiums for property coverage, which combined with the cost we may incur as a result of deductibles, we expect will result in declining overall insurance costs as compared to prior periods.
Just as with office buildings, transportation systems and government buildings, there have been reports that apartment communities could become targets of terrorism. In November 2002, Congress passed the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act (“TRIA”) which is designed to make terrorism insurance available. In connection with this legislation, we have purchased insurance for property damage due to terrorism up to $200,000,000. Additionally, we have purchased insurance for certain terrorist acts, not covered under TRIA, such as domestic-based terrorism. This insurance, often referred to as “non-certified” terrorism insurance, is subject to deductibles, limits and exclusions. Our general liability policy provides TRIA coverage (subject to deductibles and insured limits) for liability to third parties that result from terrorist acts at our communities. TRIA is scheduled to expire on December 31, 2005. It is uncertain if Congress will extend this act and continue to provide federal support for terrorism insurance. If Congress does not extend TRIA, the cost and availability of terrorism insurance may be in question.
Mold growth may occur when excessive moisture accumulates in buildings or on building materials, particularly if the moisture problem remains undiscovered or is not addressed over a period of time. Although the occurrence of mold at multi-family and other structures, and the need to remediate such mold, is not a new phenomenon, there has been increased awareness in recent years that certain molds may in some instances lead to adverse health effects, including allergic or other reactions. To help limit mold growth, we educate residents about the importance of adequate ventilation and request or require that they notify us when they see mold or excessive moisture. We have established procedures for promptly addressing and remediating mold or excessive moisture from apartment homes when we become aware of

46


 

its presence regardless of whether we or the resident believe a health risk is present. However, we cannot assure that mold or excessive moisture will be detected and remediated in a timely manner. If a significant mold problem arises at one of our communities, we could be required to undertake a costly remediation program to contain or remove the mold from the affected community and could be exposed to other liabilities. We cannot assure that we will have coverage under our existing policies for property damage or liability to third parties arising as a result of exposure to mold or a claim of exposure to mold at one of our communities.
Inflation and Deflation
Substantially all of our apartment leases are for a term of one year or less. In an inflationary environment, this may allow us to realize increased rents upon renewal of existing leases or the beginning of new leases. Short-term leases generally minimize our risk from the adverse effects of inflation, although these leases generally permit residents to leave at the end of the lease term and therefore expose us to the effect of a decline in market rents. In a deflationary rent environment, we may be exposed to declining rents more quickly under these shorter-term leases.
Forward-Looking Statements
This Form 10-Q contains “forward-looking statements” as that term is defined under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. You can identify forward-looking statements by our use of the words “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “estimate,” “assume,” “project,” “plan,” “may,” “shall,” “will” and other similar expressions in this Form 10-Q, that predict or indicate future events and trends and that do not report historical matters. These statements include, among other things, statements regarding our intent, belief or expectations with respect to:
  •   our potential development, redevelopment, acquisition or disposition of communities;
 
  •   the timing and cost of completion of apartment communities under construction, reconstruction, development or redevelopment;
 
  •   the timing of lease-up, occupancy and stabilization of apartment communities;
 
  •   the pursuit of land on which we are considering future development;
 
  •   the anticipated operating performance of our communities;
 
  •   cost, yield and earnings estimates;
 
  •   our declaration or payment of distributions;
 
  •   our joint venture and discretionary fund activities;
 
  •   our policies regarding investments, indebtedness, acquisitions, dispositions, financings and other matters;
 
  •   our qualification as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code;
 
  •   the real estate markets in Northern and Southern California and markets in selected states in the Mid-Atlantic, Northeast, Midwest and Pacific Northwest regions of the United States and in general;
 
  •   the availability of debt and equity financing;
 
  •   interest rates;
 
  •   general economic conditions; and
 
  •   trends affecting our financial condition or results of operations.

47


 

We cannot assure the future results or outcome of the matters described in these statements; rather, these statements merely reflect our current expectations of the approximate outcomes of the matters discussed. You should not rely on forward-looking statements because they involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, some of which are beyond our control. These risks, uncertainties and other factors may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from the anticipated future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements.
Some of the factors that could cause our actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from those expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, the following:
  •   we may fail to secure development opportunities due to an inability to reach agreements with third parties to obtain land at attractive prices or to obtain desired zoning and other local approvals;
 
  •   we may abandon or defer development opportunities for a number of reasons, including changes in local market conditions which make development less desirable, increases in costs of development and increases in the cost of capital, resulting in losses;
 
  •   construction costs of a community may exceed our original estimates;
 
  •   we may not complete construction and lease-up of communities under development or redevelopment on schedule, resulting in increased interest costs and construction costs and a decrease in our expected rental revenues;
 
  •   occupancy rates and market rents may be adversely affected by competition and local economic and market conditions which are beyond our control;
 
  •   financing may not be available on favorable terms or at all, and our cash flow from operations and access to cost effective capital may be insufficient for the development of our pipeline which could limit our pursuit of opportunities;
 
  •   our cash flow may be insufficient to meet required payments of principal and interest, and we may be unable to refinance existing indebtedness or the terms of such refinancing may not be as favorable as the terms of existing indebtedness;
 
  •   we may be unsuccessful in our management of the Fund and the Fund REIT; and
 
  •   we may be unsuccessful in managing changes in our portfolio composition.
In addition, these forward-looking statements represent our estimates and assumptions only as of the date of this report. We do not undertake to update these forward-looking statements, and therefore they may not represent our estimates and assumptions after the date of this report.

48


 

         
Part I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION (continued)
 
       
Item 3.   Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
 
       
    There have been no material changes to our exposures to market risk since December 31, 2004.
 
       
Item 4.   Controls and Procedures
 
       
 
  (a)   Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures.
 
       
 
      The Company carried out an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of June 30, 2005. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms. We continue to review and document our disclosure controls and procedures, including our internal controls and procedures for financial reporting, and may from time to time make changes aimed at enhancing their effectiveness and to ensure that our systems evolve with our business.
 
       
 
  (b)   Changes in internal controls over financial reporting.
 
       
 
      During the second quarter of 2005, the Company implemented a new version of its financial accounting and general ledger system, which provided certain enhancements, efficiencies and increased security features to the financial reporting process and surrounding internal controls. As with any new technology application the Company implements, the design of the internal controls have been evaluated by management for effectiveness.
     
Part II. OTHER INFORMATION
 
   
Item 1.
  Legal Proceedings
 
   
 
  As reported most recently in our Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, we are currently involved in litigation with York Hunter Construction, Inc. and National Union Fire Insurance Company. A non-jury trial ended in April 2004 and on May 20, 2004, the court issued a ruling, finding that (i) York Hunter breached the Construction Management Agreement between it and the Company in failing to complete the project and abandoning the construction site and is therefore liable to the Company for consequential damages, and (ii) National Union, having failed to exercise its various rights to perform and complete, is liable to the Company for consequential damages. The court issued a ruling dated October 6, 2004, awarding the Company approximately $1.25 million plus interest. The Company is filing an appeal to seek an increase in the damage award.
 
   
 
  Also as reported in our Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, on June 6, 2003, a purported California class action lawsuit, Julie E. Ko v. AvalonBay Communities, Inc. and Does 1 through 100, was filed against the Company in California’s Los Angeles County Superior Court. The suit purports to be brought on behalf of all of the Company’s former California residents who, during the four-year period prior to the filing of the suit, paid a security deposit to the Company for the rental of residential property in California

49


 

     
 
  and had a portion of the deposit withheld by the Company in excess of the damages actually sustained by the Company. The plaintiff seeks compensatory and statutory damages in unspecified amounts as well as injunctive relief, restitution, and an award of attorneys’ fees, expenses and costs of suit. The complaint seeking class certification was amended in March 2004 and the Company responded to the amended complaint on May 3, 2004. Due to the uncertainty of many critical factual and legal issues, including the viability of the case as a class action, it is difficult to determine or predict the outcome. However, management is currently engaged in mediation and settlement negotiations with the plaintiff.
 
   
 
  We are involved in various other claims and/or administrative proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of our business. While no assurances can be given, the Company does not believe that any of these outstanding litigation matters, individually or in the aggregate will have a material adverse effect on the Company.
 
   
Item 2.
  Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
 
   
 
  During the three months ended June 30, 2005, AvalonBay issued 10,029 shares of common stock in exchange for 10,029 units of limited partnership held by certain limited partners of Bay Countrybrook, L.P. and Avalon Upper Falls Limited Partnership. The shares were issued in reliance on an exemption from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933. AvalonBay is relying on the exemption based on factual representations received from the limited partners who received these shares.
 
   
Item 3.
  Defaults Upon Senior Securities
 
   
 
  None.
 
   
Item 4.
  Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
 
   
 
  The Company held its 2005 Annual Meeting of Stockholders on May 11, 2005. The stockholders voted to elect Bryce Blair, Bruce A. Choate, John J. Healy, Jr., Gilbert M. Meyer, Charles D. Peebler, Jr., Lance R. Primis, Allan D. Schuster and Amy P. Williams to serve as directors of the Company until the 2006 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and until their respective successors are duly elected and qualified.
 
   
 
  65,097,033 votes were cast for and 421,903 votes were withheld from the election of Mr. Blair.
 
   
 
  64,980,871 votes were cast for and 538,065 votes were withheld from the election of Mr. Choate.
 
   
 
  65,392,144 votes were cast for and 126,792 votes were withheld from the election of Mr. Healy.
 
   
 
  65,099,573 votes were cast for and 419,363 votes were withheld from the election of Mr. Meyer.
 
   
 
  65,066,502 votes were cast for and 452,434 votes were withheld from the election of Mr. Peebler.
 
   
 
  65,389,327 votes were cast for and 129,609 votes were withheld from the election of Mr. Primis.
 
   
 
  65,395,582 votes were cast for and 123,354 votes were withheld from the election of Mr. Schuster.
 
   
 
  65,391,583 votes were cast for and 127,353 votes were withheld from the election of Ms. Williams.
 
   
 
  Stockholders were also asked to vote on ratifying the selection of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s independent auditors for 2005. 64,021,456 votes were cast in favor of ratifying the selection of Ernst & Young LLP, 1,480,299 votes were cast against, and 17,180 abstained.

50


 

     
Item 5.
  Other Information
 
   
 
  None.
 
   
Item 6.
  Exhibits
         
Exhibit No.       Description
3(i).1
  —   Articles of Amendment and Restatement of Articles of Incorporation of AvalonBay Communities (the “Company”), dated as of June 4, 1998. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(i).1 to Form 10-Q of the Company filed August 14, 1998.)
 
       
3(i).2
  —   Articles of Amendment, dated as of October 2, 1998. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1(ii) to Form 8-K of the Company filed on October 6, 1998.)
 
       
3(i).3
  —   Articles Supplementary, dated as of October 13, 1998, relating to the 8.70% Series H Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1 to Form 8-A of the Company filed October 14, 1998.)
 
       
3(ii).1
  —   Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company, as adopted by the Board of Directors on February 13, 2003. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(ii) to Form 10-K of the Company filed March 11, 2003.)
 
       
4.1
  —   Indenture of Avalon Properties, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as “Avalon Properties”) dated as of September 18, 1995. (Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K of Avalon Properties dated September 18, 1995.)
 
       
4.2
  —   First Supplemental Indenture of Avalon Properties dated as of September 18, 1995. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Form 10-K of the Company filed March 26, 2002.)
 
       
4.3
  —   Second Supplemental Indenture of Avalon Properties dated as of December 16, 1997. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Form 10-K of the Company filed March 11, 2003.)
 
       
4.4
  —   Third Supplemental Indenture of Avalon Properties dated as of January 22, 1998. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to Form 10-K of the Company filed March 11, 2003.)
 
       
4.5
  —   Indenture, dated as of January 16, 1998, between the Company and State Street Bank and Trust Company, as Trustee. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to Form 10-K of the Company filed on March 11, 2003.)
 
       
4.6
  —   First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of January 20, 1998, between the Company and the Trustee. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.6 to Form 10-K of the Company filed on March 11, 2003.)
 
       
4.7
  —   Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of July 7, 1998, between the Company and the Trustee. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Form 8-K of the Company filed on July 9, 1998.)
 
       
4.8
  —   Amended and Restated Third Supplemental Indenture, dated as of July 10, 2000 between the Company and the Trustee, including forms of Floating Rate Note and Fixed Rate Note. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 11, 2000.)

51


 

         
Exhibit No.       Description
4.9
  —   Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan of the Company filed on September 14, 1999. (Incorporated by reference to Form S-3 of the Company, File No. 333-87063.)
 
       
4.10
  —   Amendment to the Company’s Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan filed on December 17, 1999. (Incorporated by reference to the Prospectus Supplement filed pursuant to Rule 424(b)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 on December 17, 1999.)
 
       
4.11
  —   Amendment to the Company’s Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan filed on March 26, 2004. (Incorporated by reference to the Prospectus Supplement filed pursuant to Rule 424(b)(3) of the Securities Act of 1933 on March 26, 2004).
 
       
10.1
  —   Separation Agreement between the Company and Samuel B. Fuller, dated as of April 6, 2005. (Incorporated by reference to Form 10-Q of the Company filed My 6, 2005).
 
       
12.1
  —   Statements re: Computation of Ratios. (Filed herewith.)
 
       
31.1
  —   Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Chief Executive Officer.) (Filed herewith.)
 
       
31.2
  —   Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Chief Financial Officer.) (Filed herewith.)
 
       
32
  —   Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer). (Furnished herewith.)

52


 

SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
AVALONBAY COMMUNITIES, INC.
     
Date: August 8, 2005
   /s/ Bryce Blair
 
   
 
  Bryce Blair
 
  Chief Executive Officer
 
   
Date: August 8, 2005
   /s/ Thomas J. Sargeant
 
   
 
  Thomas J. Sargeant
 
  Chief Financial Officer

53