10-Q: Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)
Published on May 10, 2007
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007
Commission file number 1-12672
AVALONBAY COMMUNITIES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Maryland (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
77-0404318 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
2900 Eisenhower Avenue, Suite 300
Alexandria, Virginia 22314
(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)
Alexandria, Virginia 22314
(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)
(703) 329-6300
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
(Former name, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding twelve (12) months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has
been subject to such filing requirements for the past ninety (90) days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the Exchange registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, or a non-accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).
Large accelerated filer þ Accelerated filer o Non-accelerated filer o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Act).
Yes o No þ
APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock as of the
latest practicable date:
79,646,291 shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, were outstanding as of April 30, 2007
AVALONBAY COMMUNITIES, INC.
FORM 10-Q
INDEX
FORM 10-Q
INDEX
Page | ||||
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION |
||||
Item 1. Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements |
||||
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2007 (unaudited) and
December 31, 2006 |
2 | |||
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Other Comprehensive Income
(unaudited) for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and
2006 (restated) |
3 | |||
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited) for the three months
ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 (restated) |
4-5 | |||
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited) |
6-26 | |||
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations |
27-50 | |||
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |
51 | |||
Item 4. Controls and Procedures |
51 | |||
PART II OTHER INFORMATION |
||||
Item 1. Legal Proceedings |
51 | |||
Item 1a. Risk Factors |
51 | |||
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds |
51-52 | |||
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities |
52 | |||
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders |
52 | |||
Item 5. Other Information |
52 | |||
Item 6. Exhibits |
52-54 | |||
SIGNATURES |
54 |
EXPLANATORY NOTE
We have filed Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A to our Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 filed on March 1, 2007 (the Form 10-K) (1)
to restate our financial statements as of December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 and for the years then
ended and to amend other Items contained in the Form 10-K to reflect such restatement, and (2) to
correct a typographical error in the description of the Second Amended and Restated Revolving Loan
Agreement of the Company referenced as Exhibit 10.32 to the Form 10-K. In addition we have
restated our financial statements for the three months ended March 31, 2006. This restatement is
reported in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 2007. We have not amended and do not anticipate
amending our Annual Reports on Form 10-K for any years prior to
fiscal year 2006, nor will we be amending any of our previously filed
Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q. The financial statements and other
information that have been previously filed or otherwise reported for
these periods should no longer be relied upon; all such prior
information is superseded by the information in our Form 10-K/A and
this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31,
2007.
As
discussed in Amendment No. 1 on our Form 10-K/A filed on May 10, 2007, this restatement
revises our accounting for long-term land leases. We revised the accounting for leases with fixed,
or minimum, escalations, recognizing as rental expense on a straight-line basis, the aggregate
undiscounted payments required over the non-cancelable portion of the
lease term, as opposed to our expected
holding period of our interest in the related asset. This change primarily impacts the land lease
accounting related to one consolidated asset with a 90-year lease
that became effective in 1999, in which the land lessor is also
our partner in the venture holding the asset. In addition, we recognized as a component
of minority interest, the value associated with a provision allowing
our partner in that same venture to put their interest in the venture
to us based on the fair market value of the underlying real estate as a component of
minority interest, with the offset to stockholders equity.
1
AVALONBAY COMMUNITIES, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
3-31-07 | 12-31-06 | |||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Real estate: |
||||||||
Land |
$ | 993,964 | $ | 958,254 | ||||
Buildings and improvements |
4,697,012 | 4,597,435 | ||||||
Furniture, fixtures and equipment |
147,047 | 143,480 | ||||||
5,838,023 | 5,699,169 | |||||||
Less accumulated depreciation |
(1,148,518 | ) | (1,104,507 | ) | ||||
Net operating real estate |
4,689,505 | 4,594,662 | ||||||
Construction in progress, including land |
685,665 | 641,781 | ||||||
Land held for development |
315,241 | 209,568 | ||||||
Operating real estate assets held for sale, net |
64,680 | 64,351 | ||||||
Total real estate, net |
5,755,091 | 5,510,362 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
356,435 | 8,567 | ||||||
Cash in escrow |
132,123 | 136,989 | ||||||
Resident security deposits |
28,938 | 26,574 | ||||||
Investments in unconsolidated real estate entities |
40,243 | 42,724 | ||||||
Deferred financing costs, net |
25,656 | 26,343 | ||||||
Deferred development costs |
38,932 | 39,365 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
46,631 | 54,567 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 6,424,049 | $ | 5,845,491 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||||
Unsecured
notes, net |
$ | 2,153,184 | $ | 2,153,078 | ||||
Variable rate unsecured credit facility |
| | ||||||
Mortgage notes payable |
654,723 | 672,508 | ||||||
Dividends payable |
69,871 | 60,417 | ||||||
Payables for construction |
58,844 | 59,232 | ||||||
Accrued expenses and other liabilities |
192,430 | 189,767 | ||||||
Accrued interest payable |
29,229 | 37,236 | ||||||
Resident security deposits |
39,819 | 38,803 | ||||||
Liabilities related to real estate assets held for sale |
42,792 | 42,985 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
3,240,892 | 3,254,026 | ||||||
Minority interest of unitholders in consolidated partnerships |
21,950 | 18,311 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies |
| | ||||||
Stockholders equity: |
||||||||
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; $25 liquidation preference; 50,000,000 shares
authorized at both March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006; 4,000,000 shares issued
and outstanding at both March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006 |
40 | 40 | ||||||
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 140,000,000 shares authorized at both March 31, 2007
and December 31, 2006; 79,639,601 and 74,668,372 shares issued and outstanding at
March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively |
796 | 747 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
3,099,813 | 2,482,516 | ||||||
Accumulated earnings less dividends |
63,965 | 93,430 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
(3,407 | ) | (3,579 | ) | ||||
Total stockholders equity |
3,161,207 | 2,573,154 | ||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
$ | 6,424,049 | $ | 5,845,491 | ||||
See accompanying notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
2
AVALONBAY COMMUNITIES, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
AND OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
For the three months ended | ||||||||
3-31-07 | 3-31-06 | |||||||
(restated) | ||||||||
Revenue: |
||||||||
Rental and other income |
$ | 195,262 | $ | 173,952 | ||||
Management, development and other fees |
1,444 | 1,207 | ||||||
Total revenue |
196,706 | 175,159 | ||||||
Expenses: |
||||||||
Operating expenses, excluding property taxes |
57,718 | 51,724 | ||||||
Property taxes |
17,726 | 16,904 | ||||||
Interest expense, net |
23,878 | 28,664 | ||||||
Depreciation expense |
44,094 | 40,225 | ||||||
General and administrative expense |
6,780 | 6,283 | ||||||
Total expenses |
150,196 | 143,800 | ||||||
Equity in income of unconsolidated entities |
(86 | ) | 227 | |||||
Minority interest in consolidated partnerships |
(449 | ) | (132 | ) | ||||
Gain on sale of land |
545 | 13,166 | ||||||
Income from continuing operations |
46,520 | 44,620 | ||||||
Discontinued operations: |
||||||||
Income from discontinued operations |
| 1,075 | ||||||
Gain on sale of communities |
| 65,419 | ||||||
Total discontinued operations |
| 66,494 | ||||||
Net income |
46,520 | 111,114 | ||||||
Dividends attributable to preferred stock |
(2,175 | ) | (2,175 | ) | ||||
Net income available to common stockholders |
$ | 44,345 | $ | 108,939 | ||||
Other comprehensive income: |
||||||||
Unrealized gain on cash flow hedges |
172 | 541 | ||||||
Comprehensive income |
$ | 44,517 | $ | 109,480 | ||||
Dividends declared per common share |
$ | 0.85 | $ | 0.78 | ||||
Earnings per common share basic: |
||||||||
Income from continuing operations
(net of dividends attributable to preferred stock) |
$ | 0.57 | $ | 0.58 | ||||
Discontinued operations |
| 0.90 | ||||||
Net income available to common stockholders |
$ | 0.57 | $ | 1.48 | ||||
Earnings per common share diluted: |
||||||||
Income from continuing operations
(net of dividends attributable to preferred stock) |
$ | 0.56 | $ | 0.57 | ||||
Discontinued operations |
| 0.88 | ||||||
Net income available to common stockholders |
$ | 0.56 | $ | 1.45 | ||||
See accompanying notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
3
AVALONBAY COMMUNITIES, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands)
For the three months ended | ||||||||
3-31-07 | 3-31-06 | |||||||
(restated) | ||||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||||||
Net income |
$ | 46,520 | $ | 111,114 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash provided
by operating activities: |
||||||||
Depreciation expense |
44,094 | 40,225 | ||||||
Amortization of deferred financing costs and debt premium/discount |
1,199 | 1,037 | ||||||
Amortization of deferred compensation |
5,539 | 5,156 | ||||||
Income allocated to minority interest in consolidated partnerships |
449 | 132 | ||||||
Equity in income of unconsolidated entities, net of eliminations |
326 | (17 | ) | |||||
Return on investment of unconsolidated entities |
99 | 46 | ||||||
Gain on sale of real estate assets |
(545 | ) | (78,585 | ) | ||||
Decrease
(increase) in cash in operating escrows |
4,866 | (1,040 | ) | |||||
Decrease in resident security deposits, prepaid
expenses and other assets |
6,603 | 4,708 | ||||||
Decrease in accrued expenses, other liabilities
and accrued interest payable |
(9,962 | ) | (8,864 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
99,188 | 73,912 | ||||||
Cash flows
provided by investing activities: |
||||||||
Development/redevelopment of real estate assets including
land acquisitions and deferred development costs |
(291,082 | ) | (116,853 | ) | ||||
Capital expenditures existing real estate assets |
(355 | ) | (1,909 | ) | ||||
Capital expenditures non-real estate assets |
(568 | ) | (188 | ) | ||||
Proceeds
from sale of real estate assets, net of selling costs |
5,129 | 179,022 | ||||||
Increase (decrease) in payables for construction |
(388 | ) | 4,832 | |||||
Decrease in cash in construction escrows |
| 19,572 | ||||||
Decrease in investments in unconsolidated real estate entities |
1,998 | 657 | ||||||
Net cash
(used in) provided by investing activities |
(285,266 | ) | 85,133 | |||||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
||||||||
Issuance of common stock |
612,744 | 12,500 | ||||||
Dividends paid |
(60,342 | ) | (54,454 | ) | ||||
Net borrowings under unsecured credit facility |
| (66,800 | ) | |||||
Issuance of mortgage notes payable |
5,150 | |||||||
Repayments of mortgage notes payable |
(17,785 | ) | (1,546 | ) | ||||
Repayment of unsecured notes |
| (4,000 | ) | |||||
Payment of deferred financing costs |
(406 | ) | | |||||
Distributions to DownREIT partnership unitholders |
(88 | ) | (99 | ) | ||||
Distributions to joint venture and profit sharing partners |
(177 | ) | (33 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
533,946 | (109,282 | ) | |||||
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
347,868 | 49,763 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
8,567 | 6,138 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
$ | 356,435 | $ | 55,901 | ||||
Cash paid during year for interest, net of amount capitalized |
$ | 36,052 | $ | 33,957 | ||||
See accompanying notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
4
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (continued)
Supplemental disclosures of non-cash investing and financing activities (dollars in thousands):
During the three months ended March 31, 2007:
| As described in Note 4, Stockholders Equity, 69,576 shares of common stock valued at $10,279 were issued in connection with stock grants, 534 shares valued at $73 were issued through the Companys dividend reinvestment plan, 38,692 shares valued at $4,329 were withheld to satisfy employees tax withholding and other liabilities and 1,904 shares valued at $70 were forfeited, for a net value of $5,953. In addition, the Company granted 335,856 options for common stock, net of forfeitures, at a value of $7,417. | ||
| 15,173 units of limited partnership, valued at $737, were presented for redemption to the DownREIT partnerships that issued such units and were acquired by the Company in exchange for an equal number of shares of the Companys common stock. | ||
| The Company recorded a decrease to other liabilities of $194 and a gain to other comprehensive income of $172 to adjust the Companys Hedging Derivatives (as defined in Note 5, Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities) to their fair value. | ||
| Common and preferred dividends declared but not paid totaled $69,871. |
During the three months ended March 31, 2006:
| 118,191 shares of common stock valued at $11,960 were issued in connection with stock grants, 233 shares valued at $22 were issued through the Companys dividend reinvestment plan, and 40,577 shares valued at $3,216 were withheld to satisfy employees tax withholding and other liabilities, for a net value of $8,766. In addition, the Company granted 859,613 options for common stock, net of forfeitures, at a value of $9,816. | ||
| 301,298 units of limited partnership, valued at $13,953, were presented for redemption to the DownREIT partnerships that issued such units and were acquired by the Company in exchange for an equal number of shares of the Companys common stock. | ||
| The Company recorded a decrease to other liabilities and a corresponding gain to other comprehensive income of $541 to adjust the Companys Hedging Derivatives to their fair value. | ||
| Common and preferred dividends declared but not paid totaled $60,161. |
5
AVALONBAY COMMUNITIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
1. Organization and Significant Accounting Policies
Organization
AvalonBay Communities, Inc. (the Company, which term, unless the context otherwise requires, refers to AvalonBay Communities, Inc. together with its subsidiaries) is a Maryland corporation that has elected to be taxed as a real estate investment trust (REIT) under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the Code), as amended. The Company focuses on the ownership and operation of apartment communities in high barrier-to-entry markets of the United States. These markets are located in the Northeast, Mid-Atlantic, Midwest, Pacific Northwest, and Northern and Southern California regions of the country. The Company is the surviving corporation from the merger (the Merger) of Bay Apartment Communities, Inc., and Avalon Properties, Inc. on June 4, 1998. | ||
At March 31, 2007, the Company owned or held a direct or indirect ownership interest in 155 operating apartment communities containing 44,353 apartment homes in ten states and the District of Columbia, of which six communities containing 2,054 apartment homes were under reconstruction. In addition, the Company owned or held a direct or indirect ownership interest in 16 communities under construction that are expected to contain an aggregate of 5,049 apartment homes when completed. The Company also owned or held a direct or indirect ownership interest in rights to develop an additional 56 communities that, if developed in the manner expected, will contain an estimated 14,809 apartment homes. | ||
During the three months ended March 31, 2007: |
| The Company completed the development of two communities, Avalon at Chestnut Hill and Avalon at Decoverly II. Avalon at Chestnut Hill, located in Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts, is a mid-rise community containing 204 homes and was completed for a total capitalized cost of $61,200. Avalon at Decoverly II, the second phase of a two-phase community located in Rockville, Maryland, is a garden-style community containing 196 homes and was completed for a total capitalized cost of $30,800. | ||
| The Company commenced construction of Avalon Morningside Park, located in New York, New York. Avalon Morningside Park is expected to have 296 apartment homes when completed for a total projected capitalized cost of $125,500. | ||
| The Company completed the redevelopment of Avalon Arlington Heights, located in Arlington Heights, Illinois. Avalon Arlington Heights is a high-rise community with 409 apartment homes and redevelopment was completed for a total capitalized cost of $6,700, excluding costs incurred prior to redevelopment. | ||
| The Company purchased a parcel of land located in Brooklyn, New York for approximately $70,000. The Company expects to begin construction of a 628 apartment home high-rise community in the second half of 2007. | ||
| In conjunction with the inclusion of its common stock in the S&P 500 Index, the Company issued 4,600,000 shares of its common stock at $129.30 per share. Net proceeds of approximately $594,000 will be used for general corporate purposes. | ||
| The Company sold a parcel of land in Kensington, Maryland through a taxable REIT subsidiary for a sales price of $5,800, resulting in a gain in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) of $545. | ||
| AvalonBay Value Added Fund, L.P. (the Fund), the private, discretionary investment vehicle in which the Company holds an equity interest of approximately 15%, acquired three communities. The Fund also commenced redevelopment of Fuller Martel, located in Los Angeles, California. Fuller Martel is a garden-style community containing 82 homes and the projected total capitalized cost for redevelopment is $3,400, excluding costs incurred prior to redevelopment. See Note 6, Investments in Unconsolidated Entities. |
The interim unaudited financial statements have been prepared in accordance with GAAP for interim
financial information and in conjunction with the rules and regulations of the Securities and
Exchange Commission (SEC). Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in
financial statements required by GAAP have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and
regulations. These unaudited financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial
statements and notes included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended
December 31, 2006. The results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2007 are not
necessarily indicative of the operating results for the full year. Management believes the
disclosures are adequate to
6
ensure the information presented is not misleading. In the opinion of management, all adjustments
and eliminations, consisting only of normal, recurring adjustments necessary for a fair
presentation of the financial statements for the interim periods, have been included.
Principles of Consolidation
The accompanying Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of the Company
and its wholly-owned partnerships, certain joint venture partnerships, subsidiary partnerships
structured as DownREITs and any variable interest entities consolidated under FASB Interpretation
No. 46 (FIN 46(R)), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, an Interpretation of ARB No.
51, as revised in December 2003. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been
eliminated in consolidation.
The Company assesses consolidation of variable interest entities under the guidance of FIN 46(R).
The Company accounts for joint venture entities and subsidiary partnerships, including those
structured as DownREITs, that are not variable interest entities, in accordance with EITF Issue No.
04-5, Determining Whether a General Partner, or the General Partners as a Group, Controls a
Limited Partnership or Similar Entity When the Limited Partners Have Certain Rights, Statement of
Position (SOP) 78-9, Accounting for Investments in Real Estate Ventures, Accounting Principles
Board (APB) Opinion No. 18, The Equity Method of Accounting for Investments in Common Stock and
EITF Topic D-46, Accounting for Limited Partnership Investments. The Company uses EITF Issue No.
04-5 to evaluate the partnership of each joint venture entity and determine whether control over
the partnership, as defined by the EITF, lies with the general partner, or the limited partners,
when the limited partners have certain rights. The general partner in a limited partnership is
presumed to control that limited partnership, unless that presumption is overcome by the limited
partners having either: (i) the substantive ability, either by a single limited partner or through
a simple majority vote, to dissolve the limited partnership or otherwise remove the general partner
without cause; or (ii) substantive participating rights. If the Company is the general partner and
has control over the partnership, or if the Companys limited partnership ownership includes the
ability to dissolve the partnership, or has substantive participating rights, as discussed above,
the Company consolidates the investments. If the Company is not the general partner, or the
Companys partnership interest does not contain either of the above terms which overcome the
presumption of control in a limited partnership residing with the general partner, the Company then
looks to the guidance in SOP 78-9, APB 18 and EITF D-46 to determine the accounting framework to
apply. The Company generally uses the equity method to account for
these investments unless its
ownership interest is so minor that it has virtually no influence over the partnership operating
and financial policies. Investments in which the Company has little or no influence are accounted
for using the cost method.
In each of the partnerships structured as DownREITs, either the Company or one of the Companys
wholly owned subsidiaries is the general partner, and there are one or more limited partners whose
interest in the partnership is represented by units of limited partnership interest. For each
DownREIT partnership, limited partners are entitled to receive an initial distribution before any
distribution is made to the general partner. Although the partnership agreements for each of the
DownREITs are different, generally the distributions per unit paid to the holders of units of
limited partnership interests have approximated the Companys current common stock dividend per
share. The holders of units of limited partnership interest have the right to present all or some
of their units for redemption for a cash amount as determined by the applicable partnership
agreement and based on the fair value of the Companys common stock. In lieu of cash redemption,
the Company may elect to exchange such units for an equal number of shares of the Companys common
stock.
In conjunction with the acquisition and development of investments in unconsolidated entities, the
Company may incur costs in excess of its equity in the underlying assets. These costs are
capitalized and depreciated over the life of the underlying assets to the extent that the Company
expects to recover the costs.
Revenue and Gain Recognition
Rental income related to leases is recognized on an accrual basis when due from residents in
accordance with SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104, Revenue Recognition, and Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 13, Accounting for Leases. In accordance with the
Companys standard lease terms, rental payments are generally due on a monthly basis. Any cash
concessions given at the inception of the lease are amortized over the approximate life of the
lease, which is generally one year.
7
The Company accounts for sales of real estate assets and the related gain recognition in accordance
with SFAS No. 66, Accounting for Sales of Real Estate.
Real Estate
Operating real estate assets are stated at cost and consist of land, buildings and
improvements, furniture, fixtures and equipment, and other costs incurred during their development,
redevelopment and acquisition. Significant expenditures which improve or extend the life of an
asset are capitalized. Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged to operations as
incurred.
The Companys policy with respect to capital expenditures is generally to capitalize only
non-recurring expenditures. Improvements and upgrades are capitalized only if the item exceeds $15,
extends the useful life of the asset and is not related to making an apartment home ready for the
next resident. Purchases of personal property, such as computers and furniture, are capitalized
only if the item is a new addition and exceeds $2.5. The Company generally expenses purchases of
personal property made for replacement purposes.
The capitalization of costs during the development of assets (including interest and related loan
fees, property taxes and other direct and indirect costs) begins when the Company has determined
that development of the future asset is probable and ends when the asset, or a portion of an asset,
is delivered and is ready for its intended use. Cost capitalization during redevelopment of
apartment homes (including interest and related loan fees, property taxes and other direct and
indirect costs) begins when an apartment home is taken out-of-service for redevelopment and ends
when the apartment home redevelopment is completed and the apartment home is available for a new
resident. Rental income and operating costs incurred during the initial lease-up or
post-redevelopment lease-up period are recognized as they accrue.
In accordance with SFAS No. 67, Accounting for Costs and Initial Rental Operations of Real Estate
Projects, the Company capitalizes pre-development costs incurred in pursuit of new development
opportunities for which the Company currently believes future development is probable (Development
Rights). Future development of these Development Rights is dependent upon various factors,
including zoning and regulatory approval, rental market conditions, construction costs and
availability of capital. Pre-development costs incurred in the pursuit of Development Rights for
which future development is not yet considered probable are expensed as incurred. In addition, if
the status of a Development Right changes, making future development by the Company no longer
probable, any capitalized pre-development costs are written-off with a charge to expense. The
Company expensed costs related to abandoned pursuits, which includes the abandonment or impairment
of Development Rights, acquisition pursuits and disposition pursuits, in the amounts of $787 and
$322 for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. These costs are included in
operating expenses, excluding property taxes on the accompanying
Condensed Consolidated Statements of
Operations and Other Comprehensive Income. Abandoned pursuit costs can vary greatly, and the costs
incurred in any given period may be significantly different in future years.
The Company owns land improved with office buildings and industrial space occupied by unrelated
third parties in connection with five Development Rights. The Company intends to manage the
current improvements until such time as all tenant obligations have been satisfied or eliminated
through negotiation, and construction of new apartment communities is ready to begin. As provided
under the guidance of SFAS No. 67, the revenue from incidental operations received from the current
improvements in excess of any incremental costs are being recorded as a reduction of total
capitalized costs of the Development Right and not as part of net income.
In connection with the acquisition of an operating community, the Company performs a valuation and
allocation to each asset and liability acquired in such transaction, based on their estimated fair
values at the date of acquisition in accordance with SFAS No. 141, Business Combinations. The
purchase price allocations to tangible assets, such as land, buildings and improvements, and
furniture, fixtures and equipment, are reflected in real estate assets and depreciated over their
estimated useful lives. Any purchase price allocation to intangible assets, such as in-place
leases, is included in prepaid expenses and other assets on the accompanying Condensed Consolidated
Balance Sheets and amortized over the average remaining lease term of the acquired leases. The
fair value of acquired in-place leases is determined based on the estimated cost to replace such
leases, including foregone rents during an assumed re-lease period, as well as the impact on
projected cash flow of acquired leases with leased rents above or below current market rents.
8
Depreciation is calculated on buildings and improvements using the straight-line method over their
estimated useful lives, which range from seven to thirty years. Furniture, fixtures and equipment
are generally depreciated using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives, which
range from three years (primarily computer-related equipment) to seven years.
It is the Companys policy to perform a quarterly qualitative analysis to determine if there are
changes in circumstances that suggest the carrying value of a long-lived asset may not be
recoverable. If there is an event or change in circumstance that indicates an impairment in the
value of an operating community, the Company compares the current and projected operating cash flow
of the community over its remaining useful life, on an undiscounted basis, to the carrying amount
of the community. If the carrying amount is in excess of the estimated projected operating cash
flow of the community, the Company would recognize an impairment loss equivalent to an amount
required to adjust the carrying amount to its estimated fair market value. The Company did not
recognize an impairment loss on any of its operating communities during the three months ended
March 31, 2007 or 2006.
Deferred Financing Costs
Deferred financing costs include fees and other expenditures necessary to obtain debt financing and
are amortized on a straight-line basis, which approximates the effective interest method, over the
shorter of the term of the loan or the related credit enhancement facility, if applicable.
Unamortized financing costs are written-off when debt is retired before the maturity date.
Accumulated amortization of deferred financing costs was $17,284 at March 31, 2007 and was $16,179
at December 31, 2006.
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Cash in Escrow
Cash and cash equivalents include all cash and liquid investments with an original maturity of
three months or less from the date acquired. Cash in escrow consists primary of construction
financing proceeds that is restricted for use in the construction of a specific community. The
majority of the Companys cash, cash equivalents and cash in escrows are held at major commercial
banks.
Interest Rate Contracts
The Company utilizes derivative financial instruments to manage interest rate risk and has
designated these financial instruments as cash flow hedges under the guidance of SFAS No. 133,
Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, and SFAS No. 138, Accounting for
Certain Instruments and Certain Hedging Activities, an Amendment of Statement No. 133. This
statement requires that every derivative instrument be recorded on the balance sheet as either an
asset or liability measured at its fair value, with changes in fair value recognized currently in
earnings unless specific hedge accounting criteria are met. For cash flow hedge relationships,
changes in the fair value of the derivative instrument that are deemed effective at offsetting the
risk being hedged are reported in other comprehensive income. For cash flow hedges where the
cumulative changes in the fair value of the derivative exceed the cumulative changes in fair value
of the hedged item, the ineffective portion is recognized in current period earnings. As of March
31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, the Company had approximately
$234,000 and $277,000, respectively,
in variable rate debt subject to cash flow hedges. As of March 31,
2007, the Company had an additional $33,100 in
variable rate debt which is subject to an interest rate cap for which hedge accounting was not
applied. See Note 5, Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities, for further discussion of
derivative financial instruments.
Comprehensive Income
Comprehensive income, as reflected on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Other
Comprehensive Income, is defined as all changes in equity during each period except for those
resulting from investments by or distributions to shareholders. Accumulated other comprehensive
loss as reflected in Note 4, Stockholders Equity, reflects the effective portion of the
cumulative changes in the fair value of derivatives in qualifying cash flow hedge relationships.
Earnings per Common Share
In accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 128, Earnings per Share, basic earnings per share
is computed by
9
dividing earnings available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of shares
outstanding during the period. Other potentially dilutive common shares, and the related impact to
earnings, are considered when calculating earnings per share on a diluted basis. The Companys
earnings per common share are determined as follows:
For the three months ended | ||||||||
3-31-07 | 3-31-06 | |||||||
(restated) | ||||||||
Basic and diluted shares outstanding |
||||||||
Weighted average common shares basic |
78,431,936 | 73,808,643 | ||||||
Weighted average DownREIT units outstanding |
144,586 | 237,575 | ||||||
Effect of dilutive securities |
1,354,226 | 1,243,906 | ||||||
Weighted average common shares diluted |
79,930,748 | 75,290,124 | ||||||
Calculation of Earnings per Share basic |
||||||||
Net income available to common stockholders |
$ | 44,345 | $ | 108,939 | ||||
Weighted average common shares basic |
78,431,936 | 73,808,643 | ||||||
Earnings per common share basic |
$ | 0.57 | $ | 1.48 | ||||
Calculation of Earnings per Share diluted |
||||||||
Net income available to common stockholders |
$ | 44,345 | $ | 108,939 | ||||
Add: Minority interest of DownREIT unitholders
in consolidated partnerships, including discontinued operations |
88 | 99 | ||||||
Adjusted net income available to common stockholders |
$ | 44,433 | $ | 109,038 | ||||
Weighted average common shares diluted |
79,930,748 | 75,290,124 | ||||||
Earnings per common share diluted |
$ | 0.56 | $ | 1.45 | ||||
Certain
options to purchase shares of common stock in the amounts of 335,856
and 3,000 were outstanding
during the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006,
respectively but were not included in the computation of diluted
earnings per share because in applying the treasury stock method under the provisions of SFAS
No. 123(R), such options are anti-dilutive.
Stock-Based Compensation
The
Company adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 123(R), Share Based Payment, using the modified
prospective transition method on January 1, 2006. The adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) did not have a
material impact on the
Companys financial position or results of operations. However, the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R)
changed the service period for, and timing of, the recognition of compensation cost related to
retirement eligibility, which will generally result in accelerated expense recognition by the
Company for its stock-based compensation programs. Under the provisions of SFAS No. 123(R), the Company
is required to estimate the forfeiture of stock options and recognize compensation cost net of the
estimated forfeitures. The estimated forfeitures included in compensation cost are adjusted to
reflect actual forfeitures at the end of the vesting period. Prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R),
option forfeitures were recognized as they occurred. The forfeiture rate at March 31, 2007 was
2.5%. The application of estimated forfeitures did not materially impact compensation expense for
the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006.
Legal and Other Contingencies
The
Company is currently involved in litigation alleging that 100
communities owned by the Company, at the time of
the suit, violate the accessibility requirements of the Fair Housing Act and the Americans with
Disabilities Act. The lawsuit, Equal Rights Center v. AvalonBay Communities, Inc, was filed on
September 23, 2005 in the federal district court in Maryland. The plaintiff seeks compensatory and
punitive damages in unspecified amounts as well as injunctive relief (such as modification of
existing assets), an award of attorneys fees, expenses and costs of suit. The Company has
10
filed a
motion to dismiss all or parts of the suit, which has not been ruled on yet by the court. We cannot
predict or determine the outcome of this lawsuit, nor is it reasonably possible to estimate the
amount of loss, if any, that would be associated with an adverse decision.
During 2006, the Company determined that contaminated soil from imported fill was delivered to its
Avalon Lyndhurst development site by third parties. The contaminants exceeded allowable levels for
residential use under New Jersey state and local regulations. The remediation effort is
substantially complete. The Company has estimated that the net cost associated with this
remediation effort after considering insurance proceeds received to date, including costs
associated with construction delays, necessary to complete
construction and commence operations, is expected to be approximately $6,000. The Company is
pursuing the recovery of these additional net costs through its insurance as well as from the third
parties involved, but no assurance can be given as to the amount or timing of additional
reimbursements to the Company. The Company is recording these incremental costs as they are
incurred, and potential recoveries as they become certain or are received. Although the estimated
costs to complete construction of this community exceed the original construction budget, the
Company does not expect that, upon completion, there will be an impairment in value of this asset
which would require a write down in the carrying value. The Company will continue to review this
assessment based on changes in circumstances or market conditions.
In
addition, the Company is subject to various legal proceedings and claims that arise in the ordinary course of
business. These matters are frequently covered by insurance. If it has been determined that a
loss is probable to occur, the estimated amount of the loss is expensed in the financial
statements. While the resolution of these matters cannot be predicted
with certainty, management currently
believes the final outcome of such matters will not have a material adverse effect on the financial
position or results of operations of the Company. However, if these
matters are resolved unfavorably, they may have a material adverse
effect on the Companys financial position and results of
operations.
Assets Held for Sale & Discontinued Operations
The Company follows SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets
(SFAS 144) which requires that the assets and liabilities of any communities which have been
sold, or otherwise qualify as held for sale, be presented separately in the Condensed Consolidated
Balance Sheets. In addition, the results of operations for those assets that meet the definition
of discontinued operations are presented as such in the Companys Condensed Consolidated Statements
of Operations and Other Comprehensive Income. Held for sale and discontinued operations
classifications are provided in both the current and prior periods presented. Real estate assets
held for sale are measured at the lower of the carrying amount or the fair value less the cost to
sell. Both the real estate assets and corresponding liabilities are presented separately in the
accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. Subsequent to classification of a community as
held for sale, no further depreciation is recorded. For those assets qualifying for classification
as discontinued operations, the community specific components of net income presented as
discontinued operations include net operating income, minority interest expense, depreciation
expense and interest expense, net. For periods prior to the asset qualifying for discontinued
operations under SFAS 144, the Company reclassified the results of operations to discontinued
operations in accordance with SFAS 144. Subsequent to the reclassification to discontinued
operations, the impact of assets classified as discontinued operations on the statements of
operations and other comprehensive income will include depreciation. In addition, the net gain or
loss (including any impairment loss) on the eventual disposal of communities held for sale will be
presented as discontinued operations when recognized. A change in presentation for held for sale
or discontinued operations will not have any impact on the
Companys financial condition or results of operations. The Company combines the operating,
investing and financing portions of cash flows attributable to discontinued operations with the
respective cash flows from continuing operations on the accompanying Condensed Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
The Company adopted the provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting
for Uncertainty in Income Taxes
an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109, FIN
48, on January 1, 2007. The Company did not
have any unrecognized tax benefits and there was no material effect on either the financial condition or
results of operations of the Company as a result of implementing FIN 48. We do not believe that
there will be any material changes in our unrecognized tax positions
over the next 12 months. The Company is subject to examination
by the respective taxing authorities for the tax years 2003 through
2005.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make
certain estimates and assumptions. These estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of
assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of the
financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses
11
during the reporting periods.
Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Reclassifications
Certain reclassifications have been made to amounts in prior periods financial statements to
conform to current year presentations.
2. Interest Capitalized
The Company capitalized interest during the development and redevelopment of real estate assets in
accordance with SFAS No. 34, Capitalization of Interest Cost. Capitalized interest associated
with communities under development or redevelopment totaled $15,433 for the three months ended
March 31, 2007 and $8,364 for the three months ended March 31, 2006.
3. Notes Payable, Unsecured Notes and Credit Facility
The Companys mortgage notes payable, unsecured notes and variable rate unsecured credit facility
as of March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006 are summarized below. The following amounts and
discussion do not include the construction loan payable related to a community classified as held
for sale as of March 31, 2007 (see Note 7, Real Estate Disposition Activities).
3-31-07 | 12-31-06 | |||||||
Fixed rate unsecured notes (1)
|
$ | 2,153,184 | $ | 2,153,078 | ||||
Fixed rate mortgage notes payable conventional and tax-exempt |
217,160 | 234,272 | ||||||
Variable rate mortgage notes payable conventional and tax-exempt |
437,563 | 438,236 | ||||||
Total notes payable and unsecured notes |
2,807,907 | 2,825,586 | ||||||
Variable rate unsecured credit facility |
| | ||||||
Total mortgage notes payable, unsecured notes and unsecured credit facility |
$ | 2,807,907 | $ | 2,825,586 | ||||
(1) | Balances at March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006 include $2,816 and $2,922 of debt discount, respectively. |
During the three months ended March 31, 2007, the Company repaid an outstanding mortgage note
in the amount of $15,980, secured by the operating assets of a community.
In the aggregate, secured notes payable mature at various dates from October 2008 through April
2043 and are secured by certain apartment communities and improved land parcels (with a net
carrying value of $964,730 as of March 31, 2007). As of March 31, 2007, the Company has guaranteed
approximately $67,316 of mortgage notes payable held by wholly-owned subsidiaries; all such
mortgage notes payable are consolidated for financial reporting purposes. The weighted average
interest rate of the Companys fixed rate mortgage notes payable (conventional and tax-exempt) was
6.8% at March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006. The weighted average interest rate of the Companys
variable rate mortgage notes payable and its unsecured credit facility (as discussed on the
following page), including the effect of certain financing related fees, was 5.1% at March 31, 2007
and 5.8% at December 31, 2006.
12
Scheduled payments and maturities of mortgage notes payable and unsecured notes outstanding at
March 31, 2007 are as follows:
Stated | ||||||||||||||||
Unsecured | interest rate | |||||||||||||||
Secured notes | Secured notes | notes | of unsecured | |||||||||||||
Year | payments | maturities | maturities | notes | ||||||||||||
2007 |
$ | 6,202 | $ | | $ | 110,000 | 6.875 | % | ||||||||
150,000 | 5.000 | % | ||||||||||||||
2008 |
8,163 | 4,368 | 50,000 | 6.625 | % | |||||||||||
146,000 | 8.250 | % | ||||||||||||||
2009 |
7,236 | 73,793 | 150,000 | 7.500 | % | |||||||||||
2010 |
5,719 | 28,989 | 200,000 | 7.500 | % | |||||||||||
2011 |
4,623 | 35,910 | 300,000 | 6.625 | % | |||||||||||
50,000 | 6.625 | % | ||||||||||||||
2012 |
3,873 | 12,166 | 250,000 | 6.125 | % | |||||||||||
250,000 | 5.500 | % | ||||||||||||||
2013 |
3,950 | | 100,000 | 4.950 | % | |||||||||||
2014 |
2,915 | 34,450 | 150,000 | 5.375 | % | |||||||||||
2015 |
4,606 | | | | ||||||||||||
2016 |
4,968 | | 250,000 | 5.750 | % | |||||||||||
Thereafter |
135,553 | 277,239 | | | ||||||||||||
$ | 187,808 | $ | 466,915 | $ | 2,156,000 | |||||||||||
The Companys unsecured notes contain a number of financial and other covenants with which the
Company must comply, including, but not limited to, limits on the aggregate amount of total and
secured indebtedness the Company may have on a consolidated basis and limits on the Companys
required debt service payments.
The Company has a $650,000 revolving variable rate unsecured credit facility with a syndicate of
commercial banks. There were no amounts outstanding under the current facility and $37,443
outstanding in letters of credit on March 31, 2007. The Company did not have any amounts
outstanding under the current credit facility and $38,713 outstanding in
letters of credit on December 31, 2006. Under the terms of the credit facility, the Company may
elect to increase the facility up to $1,000,000, provided that one or more banks (from the
syndicate or otherwise) voluntarily agree to provide the additional commitment. No member of the
syndicate of banks can prohibit such increase; such an increase in the facility will only be
effective to the extent banks (from the syndicate or otherwise) choose to commit to lend additional
funds. The Company pays participating banks, in the aggregate, an annual facility fee of
approximately $813, which is subject to increase in the event that the amount available on the
facility is increased. The unsecured credit facility bears interest at varying levels based on the
London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR), rating levels achieved on the Companys unsecured notes
and on a maturity schedule
selected by the Company. The current stated pricing is LIBOR plus 0.40% per annum. The stated
spread over LIBOR can vary from LIBOR plus 0.325% to LIBOR plus 1.00% based on the Companys credit
rating. In addition, the unsecured credit facility includes a competitive bid option, which allows
banks that are part of the lender consortium to bid to make loans to the Company at a rate that is
lower than the stated rate provided by the unsecured credit facility for up to $422,500. The
competitive bid option may result in lower pricing than the stated rate if market conditions allow.
The Company had no amounts outstanding under this competitive bid option as of March 31, 2007.
The Company is subject to certain customary covenants under the unsecured credit facility,
including, but not limited to, maintaining certain maximum leverage ratios, a minimum fixed charges
coverage ratio and minimum unencumbered assets and equity levels. The credit facility matures in
November 2011, assuming exercise of a one-year renewal option by the Company.
13
4. Stockholders Equity
The following summarizes the changes in stockholders equity for the three months ended March 31,
2007:
Accumulated | Accumulated | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Additional | earnings | other | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Preferred | Common | paid-in | less | comprehensive | Stockholders' | |||||||||||||||||||
stock | stock | capital | dividends | loss | equity | |||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2006 (restated) |
$ | 40 | $ | 747 | $ | 2,482,516 | $ | 93,430 | $ | (3,579 | ) | $ | 2,573,154 | |||||||||||
Net income |
| | | 46,520 | | 46,520 | ||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized gain on cash flow hedges |
| | | | 172 | 172 | ||||||||||||||||||
Change in
redemption value of minority interest |
| | | (4,376 | ) | | (4,376 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Dividends declared to common
and preferred stockholders |
| | | (69,869 | ) | | (69,869 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock, net of withholdings |
| 49 | 610,846 | (1,740 | ) | | 609,155 | |||||||||||||||||
Amortization of deferred compensation |
| | 6,451 | | | 6,451 | ||||||||||||||||||
Balance at March 31, 2007 |
$ | 40 | $ | 796 | $ | 3,099,813 | $ | 63,965 | $ | (3,407 | ) | $ | 3,161,207 | |||||||||||
During the three months ended March 31, 2007, the Company:
(i) | Issued 4,600,000 shares of common stock in connection with an equity offering; | ||
(ii) | issued 326,542 shares of common stock in connection with stock options exercised; | ||
(iii) | issued 15,173 shares of common stock to acquire an equal number of DownREIT limited partnership units; | ||
(iv) | issued 534 shares through the Companys dividend reinvestment plan; | ||
(v) | issued 69,576 common shares in connection with stock grants; | ||
(vi) | had 1,904 shares of restricted stock forfeited; and | ||
(vii) | withheld 38,692 shares to satisfy employees tax withholding and other liabilities. |
In addition, the Company granted 339,429 options for common stock to employees. As required under
SFAS No. 123(R), any deferred compensation related to the Companys stock option and restricted
stock grants during the three months ended March 31, 2007 is not reflected on the Companys
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of March 31, 2007 or above, and will not be reflected until
earned as compensation cost.
Dividends per common share were $0.85 for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and $0.78 for the
three months ended March 31, 2006. The average dividend for all non-redeemed preferred shares for
the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 was $0.54 per share.
In 2004, the Company resumed its Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan (the DRIP). The
DRIP allows for holders of the Companys common stock or preferred stock to purchase shares of
common stock through either reinvested dividends or optional cash payments. The purchase price per
share for newly issued shares of common stock under the DRIP will be equal to the last reported
sale price for a share of the Companys common stock as reported by the New York Stock Exchange
(NYSE) on the applicable investment date.
14
5. Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
The Company enters into interest rate swap and interest rate cap agreements (collectively, the
Hedging Derivatives) to reduce the impact of interest rate fluctuations on its variable rate,
tax-exempt bonds and its variable rate conventional secured debt (collectively, the Hedged Debt).
The Company has not entered into any interest rate hedge agreements for its conventional unsecured
debt and does not enter into derivative transactions for trading or other speculative purposes.
The following table summarizes the consolidated Hedging Derivatives at March 31, 2007 (dollars in
thousands):
Interest | Interest | |||||||
Rate Caps | Rate Swaps | |||||||
Notional balance |
$ | 201,787 | $ | 65,343 | ||||
Weighted average interest rate (1)
|
5.5 | % | 6.3 | % | ||||
Weighted average capped interest rate |
7.8 | % | n/a | |||||
Earliest maturity date |
Sep-07 | Aug-07 | ||||||
Latest maturity date |
Mar-14 | Jun-10 | ||||||
Estimated
derivative fair value |
$ | 96 | $ | (2,838 | ) |
(1) | For interest rate caps, this represents the weighted average interest rate on the debt. |
At
March 31, 2007, the Company had 11 derivatives designated as cash flow hedges and one derivative
not designated as a hedge. For the derivative positions that the Company has
determined qualify as effective cash flow hedges under SFAS No. 133, the Company has recorded the
effective portion of cumulative changes in the fair value of the Hedging Derivatives in other
comprehensive income. Amounts recorded in other comprehensive income will be reclassified into
earnings in the periods in which earnings are affected by the hedged cash flow. To adjust the
Hedging Derivatives to their fair value, the Company recorded
unrealized gains in other
comprehensive income of $172 and $541 during the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006,
respectively. These amounts will be reclassified into earnings in conjunction with the periodic
adjustment of the floating rates on the Hedged Debt, in interest expense, net. The amount
reclassified into earnings for the three months ended March 31, 2007, as well as the estimated
amount included in accumulated other comprehensive income as of March 31, 2007, expected to be
reclassified into earnings within the next twelve months to offset the variability of cash flows of
the hedged items during this period are not material.
The Company assesses both at inception and on an on-going basis, the effectiveness of qualifying
cash flow hedges. Hedge ineffectiveness, reported as a component of general and administrative
expenses, did not have a material impact on earnings of the Company for any prior period, and the
Company does not anticipate that it will have a material effect in the future. The fair values of
the Hedging Derivatives are included in accrued expenses and other liabilities on the accompanying
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Derivative financial instruments expose the Company to credit risk in the event of nonperformance
by the counterparties under the terms of the Hedging Derivatives. The Company minimizes its credit
risk on these transactions by dealing with major, creditworthy financial institutions which have an
A+ or better credit rating by the Standard & Poors Ratings Group. As part of its on-going control
procedures, the Company monitors the credit ratings of counterparties and the exposure of the
Company to any single entity, thus minimizing credit risk concentration. The Company believes the
likelihood of realizing losses from counterparty non-performance is remote.
6. Investments in Unconsolidated Entities
Investments in Unconsolidated Real Estate Entities
The Company accounts for its investments in unconsolidated real estate entities that are not
considered variable interest entities under FIN 46(R) in accordance with EITF Issue No. 04-5. As
of March 31, 2007, the Companys investments in unconsolidated real estate entities accounted for
under the equity method of accounting consisted of:
15
| a 50% limited liability company membership interest in a limited liability company that owns the Avalon Grove community, in which after the limited liability company makes certain distributions to the third-party partner, the Company will generally be entitled to receive 50% of all distributions; | ||
| a 20% limited liability company membership interest in the limited liability company that owns the Avalon Chrystie Place I community, in which after the limited liability company makes certain distributions equaling a certain threshold return, to both the Company and its third-party partner, the Company will generally be entitled to receive 50% of all distributions; |
16
| a 25% limited liability company membership interest (with a right to 45% of distributions after achievement of a threshold return) in the limited liability company that developed and owns the Avalon at Mission Bay North II community; | |
| a 15.2% combined general partner and indirect limited partner equity interest in the Fund, which owns the following communities: Avalon at Redondo Beach, Avalon Lakeside, Avalon Columbia, Avalon Redmond, Avalon at Poplar Creek, Fuller Martel, Civic Center Place, Paseo Park, Aurora at Yerba Buena, Avalon at Aberdeen Station, The Springs, Cedar Valley and The Covington. During the three months ended March 31, 2007, the Fund acquired the following three communities. |
| Centerpoint, located within a single downtown city block of Baltimore, Maryland, contains a total of 392 apartment homes and approximately 33,000 square feet of retail space, and was acquired for a purchase price of $78,500. | ||
| Crystal Hill Apartments, a garden-style community consisting of 168 apartment homes located in Pomona, New York, was acquired for a purchase price of $37,800, and | ||
| Middlesex Crossing Apartments, located in Billerica, Massachusetts, was acquired for a purchase price of $37,100. Middlesex Crossing Apartments is a garden-style community consisting of 252 apartment homes. |
In addition, as part of the formation of the Fund, the Company provided a guarantee to one
of the limited partners. The guarantee provides that, if, upon final liquidation of the
Fund, the total amount of all distributions to that partner during the life of the Fund
(whether from operating cash flow or property sales) does not equal the total capital
contributions made by that partner, then the Company will pay the partner an amount equal to
the shortfall, but in no event more than 10% of the total capital contributions made by the
partner (maximum of approximately $3,400 as of March 31, 2007). As of March 31, 2007, the
fair value of the real estate assets owned by the Fund is considered adequate to cover such
potential payment under a liquidation scenario. The estimated fair value of and the
Companys obligation under this guarantee, both at inception and as of March 31, 2007 was
not significant and therefore the Company has not recorded any obligation for this guarantee
as of March 31, 2007.
17
The following is a combined summary of the financial position of the entities accounted for using
the equity method, as of the dates presented:
3-31-07 | 12-31-06 | |||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||
Assets: |
||||||||
Real estate, net |
$ | 876,208 | $ | 707,227 | ||||
Other assets |
33,212 | 55,716 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 909,420 | $ | 762,943 | ||||
Liabilities and partners equity: |
||||||||
Mortgage notes payable and credit facility |
$ | 660,017 | $ | 510,784 | ||||
Other liabilities |
40,153 | 33,505 | ||||||
Partners equity |
209,250 | 218,654 | ||||||
Total liabilities and partners equity |
$ | 909,420 | $ | 762,943 | ||||
The following is a combined summary of the operating results of the entities accounted for using
the equity method, for the periods presented:
For the three months ended | ||||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||
3-31-07 | 3-31-06 | |||||||
Rental income |
$ | 19,214 | $ | 14,505 | ||||
Operating and other expenses |
(8,775 | ) | (6,747 | ) | ||||
Interest expense, net |
(8,526 | ) | (4,908 | ) | ||||
Depreciation expense |
(5,877 | ) | (3,758 | ) | ||||
Net income |
$ | (3,964 | ) | $ | (908 | ) | ||
In addition, the Company is subject to the following arrangements related to entities that are not
accounted for under the equity method of accounting:
| The Company holds a 30% limited liability company membership interest in a limited liability company that owns the Avalon Del Rey community. In conjunction with the construction management services that the Company provided to Avalon Del Rey, the Company provided a construction completion guarantee to the construction loan lender in order to fulfill their standard financing requirements related to construction financing. The obligation of the Company under this guarantee will terminate following satisfaction of the lenders standard completion requirements, which the Company expects to occur in 2007. | ||
The Company provided an operating guarantee to the third-party investor in the limited liability company that owns Avalon Del Rey. This guarantee, which extends until December 2007, provides that if the one-year return for the initial year of the joint venture partners investment is less than a threshold return of 7% on its initial equity investment, then the Company will pay the joint venture partner an amount equal to the shortfall, up to the 7% threshold return required. As of March 31, 2007, the cash flows and return on investment for Avalon Del Rey are expected to meet and exceed the initial year threshold return required by our joint venture partner. As a result, the Companys obligation under this guarantee is insignificant, and the Company has therefore not recorded any liability associated with this guarantee as of March 31, 2007. | |||
The sale of the 70% ownership interest in 2006 is being accounted for under the deposit method of accounting pursuant to SFAS 66, with the recognition of the sale deferred until the Company is relieved of its obligation under the operating guarantee. Accordingly, the Company continues to consolidate this community for financial reporting purposes, reporting the joint venture partners interest in the net assets of the limited liability company as a component of accrued expenses and other liabilities, and recognizing the |
18
joint venture partners interest in the operating results of the limited liability company as a component of minority interest in consolidated partnerships. | |||
| The Company holds an option to make a capital contribution to an entity in connection with the pursuit of a Development Right in Pleasant Hill, California. The Company currently does not have any equity or economic interest in this entity. However, due to the nature of the Companys option to make a capital contribution, this entity is considered a variable interest entity under FIN 46(R), where the Company is the primary beneficiary. This entity does not have any operations and has minimal assets and equity, and is therefore not considered a significant variable interest entity. |
7. Real Estate Disposition Activities
During the three months ended March 31, 2007, the Company did not sell any communities. During the
three months ended March 31, 2006, the Company sold two communities, Avalon Estates, located in the
Boston, Massachusetts area, and Avalon Cupertino, located in San Jose, California. These two
communities, which contained a total of 473 apartment homes, were sold for an aggregate sales price
of $122,550. The sale of these two communities resulted in a gain as reported in accordance with
GAAP of approximately $65,419.
As of March 31, 2007, the Company had one community, Avalon Del Rey, which qualified as held for
sale under the provisions of SFAS No. 144. In 2006, the Company admitted a third-party partner
into the joint venture entity that owns Avalon Del Rey (see Note 6, Investments in Unconsolidated
Entities). However, due to the operating guarantee provided to the joint venture partner, the
Company will account for its investment under the deposit method as required by SFAS No. 66,
Accounting for Sales of Real Estate. As a result, the Company has classified the real estate
assets (which are net of an impairment charge taken on the land in 2002, as well as accumulated
depreciation recorded through December 31, 2006) and the related liabilities for Avalon Del Rey as
held for sale, as separate captions in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.
However, due to the continuing involvement of the Company through its 30% ownership interest and
its role as the managing member in the venture, Avalon Del Rey has been and will continue to be
reported as a component of continuing operations on the accompanying Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements.
Also, in accordance with the requirements of SFAS No. 144, the operations for any communities sold
from January 1, 2006 through March 31, 2007 have been presented as discontinued operations in the
accompanying Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. Accordingly, certain reclassifications
have been made in prior periods to reflect discontinued operations consistent with current period
presentation.
The following is a summary of income from discontinued operations for the periods presented:
For the three months ended | ||||||||
3-31-07 | 3-31-06 | |||||||
Rental income |
$ | | $ | 1,630 | ||||
Operating and other expenses |
| (555 | ) | |||||
Interest expense, net |
| | ||||||
Depreciation expense |
| | ||||||
Income from discontinued operations |
$ | | $ | 1,075 | ||||
The Companys Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets include other assets (excluding net real
estate) of $1,941 and $1,558 as of March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively and other
liabilities of $42,792 as of March 31, 2007 and $42,985 as of December 31, 2006, relating to real
estate assets sold or held for sale.
During the three months ended March 31, 2007, the Company sold one parcel of land through a taxable
REIT subsidiary, located in the Mid Atlantic, for a sales price of $5,800, resulting in a GAAP gain
of $545.
19
8. Segment Reporting
The Companys reportable operating segments include Established Communities, Other Stabilized
Communities, and Development/Redevelopment Communities. Annually as of January 1st, the
Company determines which of its communities fall into each of these categories and maintains that
classification, unless disposition plans regarding a community change, throughout the year for the
purpose of reporting segment operations.
| Established Communities (also known as Same Store Communities) are communities where a comparison of operating results from the prior year to the current year is meaningful, as these communities were owned and had stabilized occupancy and operating expenses as of the beginning of the prior year. For the year 2007, the Established Communities are communities that are consolidated for financial reporting purposes, had stabilized occupancy and operating expenses as of January 1, 2006, are not conducting or planning to conduct substantial redevelopment activities and are not held for sale or planned for disposition within the current year. A community is considered to have stabilized occupancy at the earlier of (i) attainment of 95% physical occupancy or (ii) the one-year anniversary of completion of development or redevelopment. | ||
| Other Stabilized Communities includes all other completed communities that have stabilized occupancy, as defined above. Other Stabilized Communities do not include communities that are conducting or planning to conduct substantial redevelopment activities within the current year. | ||
| Development/Redevelopment Communities consists of communities that are under construction and have not received a final certificate of occupancy, communities where substantial redevelopment is in progress or is planned to begin during the current year and communities under lease-up, that had not reached stabilized occupancy, as defined above, as of January 1, 2007. |
In addition, the Company owns land held for future development and has other corporate assets that
are not allocated to an operating segment.
SFAS No. 131, Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information, requires that
segment disclosures present the measure(s) used by the chief operating decision maker for purposes
of assessing such segments performance. The Companys chief operating decision maker is comprised
of several members of its executive management team who use net operating income (NOI) as the
primary financial measure for Established Communities and Other Stabilized Communities. NOI is
defined by the Company as total revenue less direct property operating expenses. Although the
Company considers NOI a useful measure of a communitys or communities operating performance, NOI
should not be considered an alternative to net income or net cash flow from operating activities,
as determined in accordance with GAAP. NOI excludes a number of income and expense categories as
detailed in the reconciliation of NOI to net income.
A reconciliation of NOI to net income for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 is as
follows:
For the three months ended | ||||||||
3-31-07 | 3-31-06 | |||||||
(restated) | ||||||||
Net income |
$ | 46,520 | $ | 111,114 | ||||
Indirect operating expenses, net of corporate income |
6,996 | 7,435 | ||||||
Investments and investment management |
2,024 | 1,471 | ||||||
Interest expense, net |
23,878 | 28,664 | ||||||
General and administrative expense |
6,780 | 6,283 | ||||||
Equity in income of unconsolidated entities |
86 | (227 | ) | |||||
Minority interest in consolidated partnerships |
449 | 132 | ||||||
Depreciation expense |
44,094 | 40,225 | ||||||
Gain on sale of land |
(545 | ) | (13,166 | ) | ||||
Gain on sale of communities |
| (65,419 | ) | |||||
Income from discontinued operations |
| (1,075 | ) | |||||
Net operating income |
$ | 130,282 | $ | 115,437 | ||||
20
The primary performance measure for communities under development or redevelopment depends on the
stage of completion. While under development, management monitors actual construction costs
against budgeted costs as well as lease-up pace and rent levels compared to budget.
The table
below provides details of the Companys segment information as of the
dates specified. The segments are classified based on the individual communitys status as of the
beginning of the given calendar year. Therefore, each year the composition of communities within
each business segment is adjusted. Accordingly, the amounts between years are not directly
comparable. The accounting policies applicable to the operating segments described above are the
same as those described in Note 1, Organization and Significant Accounting Policies. Segment
information for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 has been adjusted for the
communities that were sold from January 1, 2006 through March 31, 2007 as described in Note 7,
Real Estate Disposition Activities.
For the three months ended | ||||||||||||||||
Total | % NOI change | Gross | ||||||||||||||
revenue | NOI | from prior year | real estate(1) | |||||||||||||
For the period ended March 31, 2007 |
||||||||||||||||
Established |
||||||||||||||||
Northeast |
$ | 67,908 | $ | 45,403 | 5.8 | % | $ | 1,817,580 | ||||||||
Mid-Atlantic |
27,965 | 17,632 | 7.4 | % | 688,405 | |||||||||||
Midwest |
2,994 | 1,768 | 6.1 | % | 92,408 | |||||||||||
Pacific Northwest |
8,094 | 5,480 | 17.1 | % | 289,682 | |||||||||||
Northern California |
38,880 | 28,292 | 12.7 | % | 1,386,297 | |||||||||||
Southern California |
13,824 | 10,068 | 8.1 | % | 349,115 | |||||||||||
Total Established |
159,665 | 108,643 | 8.5 | % | 4,623,487 | |||||||||||
Other Stabilized |
15,128 | 9,715 | n/a | 425,980 | ||||||||||||
Development / Redevelopment |
20,469 | 11,924 | n/a | 1,430,977 | ||||||||||||
Land Held for Future Development |
n/a | n/a | n/a | 315,241 | ||||||||||||
Non-allocated (2) |
1,444 | n/a | n/a | 43,244 | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 196,706 | $ | 130,282 | 12.9 | % | $ | 6,838,929 | ||||||||
For the period ended March 31, 2006
(restated) |
||||||||||||||||
Established |
||||||||||||||||
Northeast |
$ | 49,696 | $ | 33,073 | 3.8 | % | $ | 1,262,747 | ||||||||
Mid-Atlantic |
25,598 | 15,949 | 14.5 | % | 620,877 | |||||||||||
Midwest |
2,736 | 1,666 | (0.7 | %) | 91,784 | |||||||||||
Pacific Northwest |
7,873 | 5,167 | 7.7 | % | 315,386 | |||||||||||
Northern California |
36,911 | 25,988 | 9.4 | % | 1,434,050 | |||||||||||
Southern California |
14,025 | 10,085 | 9.8 | % | 371,767 | |||||||||||
Total Established |
136,839 | 91,928 | 7.9 | % | 4,096,611 | |||||||||||
Other Stabilized |
22,184 | 14,287 | n/a | 760,127 | ||||||||||||
Development / Redevelopment |
14,838 | 9,222 | n/a | 746,389 | ||||||||||||
Land Held for Future Development |
n/a | n/a | n/a | 185,204 | ||||||||||||
Non-allocated (2) |
1,298 | n/a | n/a | 30,021 | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 175,159 | $ | 115,437 | 9.6 | % | $ | 5,818,352 | ||||||||
(1) | Does not include gross real estate assets held for sale of $65,405 and $92,847 as of March 31, 2007 and 2006 respectively. | |
(2) | Revenue represents third-party management, accounting and developer fees and miscellaneous income which are not allocated to a reportable segment. |
21
9. Stock-Based Compensation Plans
The Company has a stock incentive plan (the 1994 Plan), which was amended and restated on
December 8, 2004, and amended on February 9, 2006 and December 6, 2006. Individuals who are
eligible to participate in the 1994 Plan include officers, other associates, outside directors and
other key persons of the Company and its subsidiaries who are responsible for or contribute to the
management, growth or profitability of the Company and its subsidiaries. The 1994 Plan authorizes
(i) the grant of stock options that qualify as incentive stock options (ISOs) under Section 422
of the Internal Revenue Code, (ii) the grant of stock options that do not so qualify, (iii) grants
of shares of restricted and unrestricted common stock, (iv) grants of deferred stock awards, (v)
performance share awards entitling the recipient to acquire shares of common stock and (vi)
dividend equivalent rights.
Shares of common stock of 2,143,629 and 1,791,861 were available for future option or restricted
stock grant awards under the 1994 Plan as of March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively.
Annually on January 1st, the maximum number available for issuance under the 1994 Plan
is increased by between 0.48% and 1.00% of the total number of shares of common stock and DownREIT
units actually outstanding on such date. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the maximum number of
shares of stock for which ISOs may be issued under the 1994 Plan shall not exceed 2,500,000 and no
awards shall be granted under the 1994 Plan after May 11, 2011. Options and restricted stock
granted under the 1994 Plan vest and expire over varying periods, as determined by the Compensation
Committee of the Board of Directors.
Before the Merger, Avalon had adopted its 1995 Equity Incentive Plan (the Avalon 1995 Incentive
Plan). Under the Avalon 1995 Incentive Plan, a maximum number of 3,315,054 shares (or 2,546,956
shares as adjusted for the Merger) of common stock were issuable, plus any shares of common stock
represented by awards under Avalons 1993 Stock Option and Incentive Plan (the Avalon 1993 Plan)
that were forfeited, canceled, reacquired by Avalon, satisfied without the issuance of common stock
or otherwise terminated (other than by exercise). Options granted to officers, non-employee
directors and associates under the Avalon 1995 Incentive Plan generally vested over a three-year
term, expire ten years from the date of grant and are exercisable at the market price on the date
of grant.
In connection with the Merger, the exercise prices and the number of options under the Avalon 1995
Incentive Plan and the Avalon 1993 Plan were adjusted to reflect the equivalent Bay shares and
exercise prices based on the 0.7683 share conversion ratio used in the Merger. Officers,
non-employee directors and associates with Avalon 1995 Incentive Plan or Avalon 1993 Plan options
may exercise their adjusted number of options for the Companys common stock at the adjusted
exercise price. As of June 4, 1998, the date of the Merger, options and other awards ceased to be
granted under the Avalon 1993 Plan or the Avalon 1995 Incentive Plan. Accordingly, there were no
options to purchase shares of common stock available for grant under the Avalon 1995 Incentive Plan
or the Avalon 1993 Plan at March 31, 2007 or 2006.
22
Information with respect to stock options granted under the 1994 Plan, the Avalon 1995 Incentive
Plan and the Avalon 1993 Plan is as follows:
Avalon 1995 | ||||||||||||||||
Weighted | Incentive Plan | Weighted | ||||||||||||||
average | and Avalon | average | ||||||||||||||
1994 Plan | exercise price | 1993 Plan | exercise price | |||||||||||||
shares | per share | shares | per share | |||||||||||||
Options Outstanding, December 31, 2006 |
2,487,239 | $ | 69.65 | 4,240 | $ | 36.81 | ||||||||||
Exercised |
(326,542 | ) | 58.78 | | | |||||||||||
Granted |
339,429 | 147.75 | | | ||||||||||||
Forfeited |
(11,974 | ) | 106.09 | | | |||||||||||
Options Outstanding, March 31, 2007 |
2,488,152 | $ | 81.55 | 4,240 | $ | 36.81 | ||||||||||
Options Exercisable: |
||||||||||||||||
March 31, 2007 |
1,369,274 | $ | 59.71 | 4,240 | $ | 36.81 | ||||||||||
For options outstanding at March 31, 2007 under the 1994 Plan, 298,243 options had exercise prices
ranging between $31.50 and $39.99 and a weighted average remaining contractual life of 3.06 years,
222,274 options had exercise prices ranging between $40.00 and $49.99 and a weighted average
remaining contractual life of 4.69 years, 254,895 options had exercise prices between $50.00 and
$59.99 and a weighted average remaining contractual life of 6.88 years, 571,680 options had
exercise prices ranging between $69.93 and $79.99 and a weighted average remaining contractual life
of 7.88 years, 794,704 options had exercise prices ranging between $81.42 and $99.99 and a weighted
average remaining contractual life of 8.87 years, 10,500 options had exercise prices between
$103.00 and $123.03 and a weighted average remaining contractual life of 9.25 years, and 335,856
options had exercise prices of $147.75 and a weighted average remaining contractual life of 9.87
years. Options outstanding and exercisable at March 31, 2007 for the Avalon 1993 and Avalon 1995
Plans had exercise prices ranging from $35.31 to $37.66 and a weighted average contractual life of
less than one year and an intrinsic value of $395. Options outstanding under the 1994 Plan at
March 31, 2007, had an intrinsic value of $150,160. Options exercisable at March 31, 2007 under
the 1994 plan had a weighted average contractual life of 6.29 years and an intrinsic value of
$96,249. The intrinsic value of options exercised during the three months ended March 31, 2007 and
2006 was $23,256 and $17,954, respectively.
The weighted average fair value of the options granted during the three months ended March 31, 2007
is estimated at $21.85 per share on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model
with the following weighted average assumptions: dividend yield of 4.0% over the expected life of
the option, volatility of 17.30%, risk-free interest rates of 4.73% and an expected life of
approximately seven years.
The Company issued restricted stock as part of its stock-based compensation plan during the three
months ended March 31, 2007. Compensation cost is recognized over the requisite service period,
which varies, but does not exceed five years. The fair value of restricted stock is the closing
stock price on the date of the grant. Provisions of SFAS 123(R) require the Company to recognize
compensation cost taking into consideration retirement eligibility. The cost related to
stock-based compensation for restricted stock included in the determination of net income is based
on actual forfeitures for the given year. Restricted stock awards typically vest over a
five-year period with the exception of accelerated vesting provisions . Restricted stock vesting
during the three months ended March 31, 2007
had fair values ranging from $36.33 to $147.75 per share. The total fair value of shares vested
was $8,091 for the period ended March 31, 2007.
Total compensation cost recognized in income relating to deferred compensation for the three months
ended March 31, 2007 was $5,539 and total capitalized compensation cost relating to deferred
compensation for the three months ended March 31, 2007 was $912. At March 31, 2007, there was a
total of $14,097 and $17,003 in unrecognized compensation cost for unvested stock options and
unvested restricted stock, respectively. The unrecognized compensation cost for stock options does
not take into account estimated forfeitures. The unrecognized compensation cost for unvested stock
options and restricted stock is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.25
years and 2.87 years, respectively.
23
10. Related Party Arrangements
Unconsolidated Entities
The Company manages unconsolidated real estate entities for which it receives asset management,
property management, development and redevelopment fee revenue. From these entities, the Company
received fees of $1,444 and $1,207 in the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
These fees are included in management, development and other fees on the accompanying Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Other Comprehensive Income.
In addition, in connection with the construction management services that the Company provided to
MVP I, LLC, the entity that owns and developed Avalon at Mission Bay North II, the Company funds
certain construction costs that are expected to be reimbursed through construction financing within
30 to 60 days. Construction was completed in 2006, and depending on the timing of such funding,
the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets may reflect a corresponding receivable in
prepaid expenses and other assets or a corresponding liability in accrued expenses and other
liabilities. The Company has recorded receivables in the amounts of $5,368 as of March 31, 2007
and $5,654 as of December 31, 2006, from MVP I, LLC.
Director Compensation
The 1994 Plan provides that directors of the Company who are also employees receive no additional
compensation for their services as a director. On May 14, 2003, the Companys Board of Directors
approved an amendment to the 1994 Plan and certain cash compensation arrangements pursuant to which
each non-employee director would receive, following the 2004 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and
each annual meeting thereafter, (i) a number of shares of restricted stock (or deferred stock
awards) having a value of $100 based on the last reported sale price of the common stock on the New
York Stock Exchange (NYSE) on the fifth business day following the prior years annual meeting
and (ii) $30 cash, payable in quarterly installments of $7.5. A non-employee director may elect to
receive all or a portion of such cash payment in the form of a deferred stock award. In addition,
the Lead Independent Director receives an annual fee of $30 payable in equal monthly installments
of $2.5. In February 2006, the Companys Board of Directors approved another amendment to the 1994
Plan and modified the cash compensation arrangements under which (i) following the 2006 Annual
Meeting of Stockholders the cash payment was adjusted to $40, payable in quarterly installments of
$10 and (ii) following the 2007 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, the number of shares of restricted
stock (or deferred stock awards) will be calculated based on the closing price on the day of the
award (rather than the closing price on the award date of the prior year). The Company recorded
non-employee director compensation expense relating to the restricted stock grants, deferred stock
awards and stock options in the amount of $90 in the three months ended March 31, 2007 as a
component of general and administrative expense. Deferred compensation relating to these
restricted stock grants, deferred stock awards and stock options was $688 and $778 on March 31,
2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively.
11. Subsequent Events
In April 2007, in connection with a parcel of land owned by the Company in Brooklyn, New York, the
Company purchased additional development rights for $10,500.
In April
2007, a fire at Avalon Danvers, a development community located in
Danvers, Massachusetts, damaged 147 of the planned 433 apartment homes. The impacted apartment homes were under
construction and unoccupied. The fire did not damage the structures housing the current leasing
operations or occupied apartment homes. The Company expects that insurance proceeds will
substantially cover the cost to reconstruct all damaged assets as well as provide for a
reimbursement of lost net operating income due to schedule delays, resulting in no material net
economic loss to the Company.
24
12. Restatement of Previously Issued Financial Statements
The
Company has restated its Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31,
2006 in its Form 10-K/A as filed with the SEC. In addition, the
Company has restated its unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of
Operations and Other Comprehensive Income for the three months
ended March 31, 2006, as presented in the table below. The
restatement adjustments reflected in the following tables relate to the Companys accounting for
long-term land leases, changing the straight-line recognition of lease payments with fixed, or
minimum, escalations over the period equal to the non-cancelable portion of the lease term as
opposed to the Companys expected holding period of its interest in the asset. This change
primarily impacts the land lease accounting related to one consolidated asset with a 90 year lease
in which the land lessor is also the partner in the venture holding the asset. The change resulted
in an additional non-cash increase to operating expenses of approximately $2,625, per quarter in
excess of the current quarterly cash payments, as well as additional depreciation expense. The
effects of the restatement did not impact the total operating,
investing or financing cash flows. The cumulative effect of the
restatement on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
for the periods affected is as follows:
25
For the three months ended March 31, 2006 | ||||||||||||
As Previously | ||||||||||||
Reported | Adjustments | As Restated | ||||||||||
Revenue: |
||||||||||||
Rental and other income |
$ | 173,952 | $ | | $ | 173,952 | ||||||
Management, development and other fees |
1,207 | | 1,207 | |||||||||
Total revenue |
175,159 | | 175,159 | |||||||||
Expenses: |
||||||||||||
Operating expenses, excluding property taxes |
49,069 | 2,655 | 51,724 | |||||||||
Property taxes |
16,904 | | 16,904 | |||||||||
Interest expense, net |
28,664 | | 28,664 | |||||||||
Depreciation expense |
39,917 | 308 | 40,225 | |||||||||
General and administrative expense |
6,283 | | 6,283 | |||||||||
Total expenses |
140,837 | 2,963 | 143,800 | |||||||||
Joint venture income and minority interest expense |
227 | | 227 | |||||||||
Minority interest in consolidated partnerships |
(132 | ) | | (132 | ) | |||||||
Gain on sale of land |
13,166 | | 13,166 | |||||||||
Income from continuing operations |
47,583 | (2,963 | ) | 44,620 | ||||||||
Discontinued operations: |
||||||||||||
Income from discontinued operations |
1,075 | | 1,075 | |||||||||
Gain on sale of communities |
65,419 | | 65,419 | |||||||||
Total discontinued operations |
66,494 | | 66,494 | |||||||||
Net income |
114,077 | | 111,114 | |||||||||
Dividends attributable to preferred stock |
(2,175 | ) | | (2,175 | ) | |||||||
Net income available to common stockholders |
$ | 111,902 | $ | | $ | 108,939 | ||||||
Other comprehensive income: |
||||||||||||
Unrealized gain on cash flow hedges |
541 | 541 | ||||||||||
Comprehensive income |
$ | 112,443 | $ | | $ | 109,480 | ||||||
Net income per common share basic |
$ | 1.52 | $ | (0.04 | ) | $ | 1.48 | |||||
Net income
per common share - diluted |
$ | 1.49 | $ | (0.04 | ) | $ | 1.45 | |||||
26
ITEM 2. | MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations as set forth
in this Item 2 contains financial information as of December 31, 2006 and for the three months
ended March 31, 2006, that has been revised to reflect the restatement of the Consolidated Financial Statements contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended
December 31, 2006, and in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006.
See Note 12,Restatement of Previously Issued Financial Statements to the Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements included in Item 1 of this report.
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (MD&A) is
intended to help provide an understanding of our business and results of operations. This MD&A
should be read in conjunction with our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and the
accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this
report. This report, including the following MD&A, contains forward-looking statements regarding
future events or trends as described more fully under Forward-Looking Statements on page 51 of
this report. Actual results or developments could differ materially from those projected in such
statements as a result of the risk factors described in Item 1a, Risk Factors, of our Form 10-K/A
for the year ended December 31, 2006.
Executive Overview
Business Description
We are primarily engaged in developing, acquiring, owning and operating apartment communities in
high barrier-to-entry markets of the United States. We believe that apartment communities present
an attractive long-term investment opportunity compared to other real estate investments because a
broad potential resident base should help reduce demand volatility over a real estate cycle.
However, throughout the real estate cycle, apartment market fundamentals, and therefore operating
cash flows, are affected by overall economic conditions. We seek to create long-term shareholder
value by accessing capital on cost effective terms; deploying that capital to develop, redevelop
and acquire apartment communities in high barrier-to-entry markets; operating apartment
communities; and selling communities when they no longer meet our long-term investment strategy or
when pricing is attractive. Barriers-to-entry in our markets generally include a difficult and
lengthy entitlement process with local jurisdictions and dense urban or suburban areas where zoned
and entitled land is in limited supply.
Our individual markets are located in the Northeast, Mid-Atlantic, Midwest, Pacific Northwest, and
Northern and Southern California regions of the United States. Our strategy is to more deeply
penetrate these markets with a broad range of products and services and an intense focus on our
customer. A substantial majority of our communities are upscale, which generally command among the
highest rents in their markets. However, we also pursue the ownership and operation of apartment
communities that target a variety of customer segments and price points, consistent with our goal
of offering a broad range of products and services.
First Quarter 2007 Highlights
| Strong apartment fundamentals continued in the first quarter of 2007, though at a moderating pace from the strong performance experienced in 2006. This is supported by the performance of our Established Community Portfolio (as defined later in this report). Net operating income (NOI) for Established Communities increased 8.5%, driven by an increase in rental revenue of 6.6% partially offset by moderate growth in operating expenses of 2.7%. The revenue growth over the comparable period in 2006 is comprised of an increase in rental rates of 7.0% and a decrease in occupancy of 0.4%. | ||
| We continued to focus on creating value through our development activities and pipeline. In the first quarter of 2007, we completed the development of two communities containing 400 apartment homes and the redevelopment of one community containing 409 apartment homes. In addition we began the construction of a wholly-owned apartment community that, upon completion is expected to contain 296 apartment homes for a total capitalized cost of $125,500,000. |
27
| We strengthened our balance sheet through a common stock offering. In conjunction with the inclusion of our common stock in the S&P 500 Index, we issued 4,600,000 shares of our common stock at $129.30 per share. At March 31, 2007 we have approximately $356,400,000 in unrestricted cash available. | ||
| We obtained an investment interest in three additional communities containing an aggregate of 813 apartment homes and 33,000 of retail space through acquisitions by the Fund (as defined later in this report). |
Financial Outlook
We expect continued revenue and net operating income growth from Established Communities for the
remainder of 2007, but at a more moderate rate than recent levels. The combination of low home
affordability and continued but moderating job growth is expected to support continued favorable
apartment fundamentals. The single-family
housing market continues to moderate, such that the increase in home prices is flat or down, and
for-sale inventory has increased. In addition, the weak for-sale market and concerns about price
declines have served to increase the attractiveness of renting versus
owning. As a result, the current gap
between the cost to rent and the cost to own continues to make rental apartments an economically
attractive housing alternative in our markets. These recent trends increase the likelihood that
potential homebuyers will extend the period they rent a home. We expect that job growth will
continue in our markets, but at a more modest rate in 2007. After two years of low levels of net
new apartment supply, the supply of new apartment homes is expected to return to historical levels.
Overall, we expect apartment market fundamentals to remain healthy in our markets such that
apartment rental demand will outpace new supply. Given these key fundaments, our current financial
outlook provides for rental revenue growth of 5.0% to 6.5% in our Established Community portfolio
in 2007, and projected NOI growth of 5.5% to 7.5%.
We expect that our development activity will continue to create value. In positioning for future
growth, we have increased our development activity and our investments in Development Rights. We
currently have approximately $1,400,000,000 under construction (measured by total projected
capitalized cost of the communities at completion, including the portions in which joint venture
partners hold an equity or economic interest). We anticipate our construction activity will remain
at or be slightly higher than this level throughout 2007. For new development, the slowing
for-sale market has resulted in increased investment opportunities. We are being selective in
pursuing these opportunities, given continued high land prices and construction costs. We continue
to secure new Development Rights, including the acquisition of land for future development. In the
first quarter of 2007, we added Development Rights for construction of new apartment communities
that, based on total projected capitalized cost, increased Development
Rights by $400,000,000 to $4,000,000,000 at March 31, 2007.
Through our investment in and management of AvalonBay Value Added Fund, L.P., a discretionary
investment fund (the Fund) in which we hold an interest of approximately 15%, we expect
to continue to gain investment interests in existing communities. During its investment period
(which will end on or before March 16, 2008), the Fund will be our principal vehicle for acquiring
apartment communities, subject to certain exceptions. As of March 31, 2007, the total amount
invested by the Fund is $609,250,000. We expect the Fund to continue to focus on acquisition
opportunities where value can be created, generally through redevelopment, repositioning and market
cycle timing opportunities.
Real estate capital flows remain strong, with income investors seeking to acquire existing
apartment communities. As a result, opportunities to realize value upon disposition have continued
to be available. We expect asset sales of approximately $150,000,000 to $200,000,000 in 2007.
Community Information Overview
Our real estate investments consist primarily of current operating apartment communities,
communities in various stages of development (Development Communities) and Development Rights as
defined below. Our current operating communities and our Development Communities include
communities in which we hold a direct and indirect ownership interest.
Our current operating communities are further distinguished as follows:
28
| Established Communities (also known as Same Store Communities) are consolidated communities that have stabilized occupancy and operating expenses as of January 1, 2006, and are not Redevelopment Communities, as defined below. A community has stabilized occupancy at the earlier of (i) attainment of 95% physical occupancy or (ii) the one-year anniversary of completion of development or redevelopment. | ||
| Other Stabilized Communities are all other completed communities with stabilized occupancy, as defined above, other than Redevelopment Communities as defined below. | ||
| Lease-Up Communities are communities where construction has been complete for less than one year and where physical occupancy has not reached 95%. | ||
| Redevelopment Communities are communities where substantial redevelopment is in progress or is planned to begin during the current year. For wholly owned communities, redevelopment is considered substantial when capital invested during the reconstruction effort is expected to exceed the lesser of $5,000,000 or 10% of the communitys acquisition cost. The definition of substantial redevelopment may differ for communities that are not wholly owned. |
Development Communities are communities that are under construction and
for which a final certificate of occupancy has not been received. These
communities may be partially complete and operating.
Development Rights are development opportunities in the early phase of the
development process for which we have an option to either acquire land or enter into
a leasehold interest, for which we are the buyer under a long-term conditional
contract to purchase land or where we own land to develop a new community.
We generally evaluate overall operating, industry and market trends based on the operating results
of Established Communities, for which a detailed discussion can be found in Results of Operations
as part of our discussion of overall operating results. We focus on the net operating income of
our current operating communities, as defined later in this report, as one of the financial
measures to evaluate community performance. We evaluate our current and future cash needs and
future operating potential based on acquisition, disposition, development, redevelopment and
financing activities within Other Stabilized, Redevelopment and Development Communities, and
discussions related to these segments of our business can be found in Liquidity and Capital
Resources.
As of March 31, 2007, the composition of our current direct and indirect ownership interests in
apartment communities and Development Rights is as follows:
29
Number of | Number of | |||||||
communities | apartment homes | |||||||
Current Communities |
||||||||
Established Communities: |
||||||||
Northeast |
42 | 11,348 | ||||||
Mid-Atlantic |
18 | 5,933 | ||||||
Midwest |
3 | 887 | ||||||
Pacific Northwest |
9 | 2,278 | ||||||
Northern California |
26 | 7,855 | ||||||
Southern California |
9 | 2,424 | ||||||
Total Established |
107 | 30,725 | ||||||
Other Stabilized Communities: |
||||||||
Northeast |
14 | 3,834 | ||||||
Mid-Atlantic |
5 | 1,269 | ||||||
Midwest |
3 | 869 | ||||||
Pacific Northwest |
2 | 433 | ||||||
Northern California |
6 | 1,198 | ||||||
Southern California |
8 | 3,052 | ||||||
Total Other Stabilized |
38 | 10,655 | ||||||
Lease-Up Communities |
4 | 919 | ||||||
Redevelopment Communities |
6 | 2,054 | ||||||
Total Current Communities |
155 | 44,353 | ||||||
Development Communities |
16 | 5,049 | ||||||
Development Rights |
56 | 14,809 | ||||||
Results of Operation
Our year-over-year operating performance is primarily affected by changes in net operating income
of our current operating apartment communities due to market conditions; net operating income
derived from acquisitions and development completions; the loss of net operating income related to
disposed communities; and capital market, disposition and financing activity. A comparison of our
operating results for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 follows (dollars in
thousands):
30
For the three months ended | ||||||||||||||||
3-31-06 | ||||||||||||||||
3-31-07 | (restated) | $ Change | % Change | |||||||||||||
Revenue: |
||||||||||||||||
Rental and other income |
$ | 195,262 | $ | 173,952 | $ | 21,310 | 12.3 | % | ||||||||
Management, development and other fees |
1,444 | 1,207 | 237 | 19.6 | % | |||||||||||
Total revenue |
196,706 | 175,159 | 21,547 | 12.3 | % | |||||||||||
Expenses: |
||||||||||||||||
Direct property operating expenses,
excluding property taxes |
47,255 | 41,622 | 5,633 | 13.5 | % | |||||||||||
Property taxes |
17,726 | 16,904 | 822 | 4.9 | % | |||||||||||
Total community operating expenses |
64,981 | 58,526 | 6,455 | 11.0 | % | |||||||||||
Corporate-level property management
and other indirect operating expenses |
8,439 | 8,631 | (192 | ) | (2.2 | %) | ||||||||||
Investments and investment management |
2,024 | 1,471 | 553 | 37.6 | % | |||||||||||
Interest expense, net |
23,878 | 28,664 | (4,786 | ) | (16.7 | %) | ||||||||||
Depreciation expense |
44,094 | 40,225 | 3,869 | 9.6 | % | |||||||||||
General and administrative expense |
6,780 | 6,283 | 497 | 7.9 | % | |||||||||||
Total other expenses |
85,215 | 85,274 | (59 | ) | (0.1 | %) | ||||||||||
Gain on sale of land |
545 | 13,166 | (12,621 | ) | (95.9 | %) | ||||||||||
Equity in income of unconsolidated entities |
(86 | ) | 227 | (313 | ) | (137.9 | %) | |||||||||
Minority interest in consolidated partnerships |
(449 | ) | (132 | ) | (317 | ) | 240.2 | % | ||||||||
Income from continuing operations |
46,520 | 44,620 | 1,900 | 4.3 | % | |||||||||||
Discontinued operations: |
||||||||||||||||
Income from discontinued operations |
| 1,075 | (1,075 | ) | (100.0 | %) | ||||||||||
Gain on sale of communities |
| 65,419 | (65,419 | ) | (100.0 | %) | ||||||||||
Total discontinued operations |
| 66,494 | (66,494 | ) | (100.0 | %) | ||||||||||
Net Income |
46,520 | 111,114 | (64,594 | ) | (58.1 | %) | ||||||||||
Dividends attributable to preferred stock |
(2,175 | ) | (2,175 | ) | | 0.0 | % | |||||||||
Net income available to common stockholders |
$ | 44,345 | $ | 108,939 | $ | (64,594 | ) | (59.3 | %) | |||||||
Net income available to common stockholders decreased $64,594,000 or 59.3%, to $44,345,000 for the
three months ended March 31, 2007. This decrease is primarily attributable to asset sales and
related gains occurring in the first quarter of 2006, partially
offset by growth in net operating
income from Established Communities and contributions to net operating income from newly developed
communities in 2007.
Net operating income (NOI) is considered by management to be an important and appropriate
supplemental performance measure to net income because it helps both investors and management to
understand the core operations of a community or communities prior to the allocation of any
corporate-level or financing-related costs. NOI reflects the operating performance of a community
and allows for an easy comparison of the operating performance of individual assets or groups of
assets. In addition, because prospective buyers of real estate have different financing and
overhead structures, with varying marginal impacts to overhead by acquiring real estate, NOI is
considered by many in the real estate industry to be a useful measure for determining the value of
a real estate asset or group of assets. We define NOI as total property revenue less direct
property operating expenses, including property taxes.
NOI does not represent cash generated from operating activities in accordance with GAAP.
Therefore, NOI should not be considered an alternative to net income as an indication of our
performance. NOI should also not be considered an alternative to net cash flow from operating
activities, as determined by GAAP, as a measure of
liquidity, nor is NOI necessarily indicative of cash available to fund cash needs. A calculation
of NOI for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, along with reconciliation to net income
for each year, is as follows (dollars in thousands):
31
For the three months ended | ||||||||
3-31-06 | ||||||||
3-31-07 | (restated) | |||||||
Net income |
$ | 46,520 | $ | 111,114 | ||||
Indirect operating expenses, net of corporate income |
6,996 | 7,435 | ||||||
Investments and investment management |
2,024 | 1,471 | ||||||
Interest expense, net |
23,878 | 28,664 | ||||||
General and administrative expense |
6,780 | 6,283 | ||||||
Equity in income of unconsolidated entities |
86 | (227 | ) | |||||
Minority interest in consolidated partnerships |
449 | 132 | ||||||
Depreciation expense |
44,094 | 40,225 | ||||||
Gain on sale of real estate assets |
(545 | ) | (78,585 | ) | ||||
Income from discontinued operations |
| (1,075 | ) | |||||
Net operating income |
$ | 130,282 | $ | 115,437 | ||||
The NOI increase of $14,845,000 during the three months ended March 31, 2007, as compared to the
prior year period, consists of changes in the following categories (dollars in thousands):
3-31-07 | ||||
Established Communities |
$ | 8,550 | ||
Other Stabilized Communities |
4,230 | |||
Development and Redevelopment Communities |
2,065 | |||
Total |
$ | 14,845 | ||
The NOI increase in Established Communities in 2007 was largely due to the continued strong
apartment market fundamentals. For the three months ended March 31, 2007, we continued to focus on
rental rate growth, while maintaining occupancy of at least 95% in all regions. We anticipate that
increases in rental rates and overall rental revenue growth will moderate during the remainder of
2007, as we expect continued but moderating job growth (demand) and increased net supply as
compared to recent periods. We expect revenue growth from our Established Communities of 5.0% to
6.5% in 2007 as compared to 2006. There is upward pressure on operating expenses from increasing
utility, labor, and property tax expenses.
Rental
and other income increased in the three months ended
March 31, 2007 as compared to the prior year
period due to increased rental rates for our Established Communities, coupled with additional
rental income generated from newly developed communities.
Overall Portfolio The weighted average number of occupied apartment homes increased to
38,047 apartment homes for the three months ended March 31, 2007 as compared to 36,121 for
the prior year period. This change is primarily the result of increased homes available
from newly developed and acquired communities, partially offset by communities sold in 2006
as well as a slight decline in occupied apartment homes for our
Established Communities.
The weighted average monthly revenue per occupied apartment home increased to $1,709 for the
three months ended March 31, 2007 as compared to $1,591 in the prior year period.
Established Communities Rental revenue increased $9,879,000, or 6.6%, for the three months
ended March 31, 2007 over the prior year period. This increase is due to an increase in
average rental rates, partially offset by a decrease in economic occupancy. For the three
months ended March 31, 2007, the weighted average monthly revenue per occupied apartment
home increased 7.0% to $1,760 compared to
32
$1,645 in the prior year period, primarily due to
increased market rents and the decrease in the amortization of
concessions. The higher amortization recognized in the first quarter
of 2006 was due to the higher levels of concessions granted in prior
periods. The average economic occupancy decreased
from 96.5% for the three months ended March 31, 2006 to 96.1% for the three months ended
March 31, 2007. Economic occupancy takes into account the fact that apartment homes of
different sizes and locations within a community have different economic impacts on a
communitys gross revenue. Economic occupancy is defined as gross potential revenue less
vacancy loss, as a percentage of gross potential revenue. Gross potential revenue is
determined by valuing occupied homes at leased rates and vacant homes at market rents.
We experienced increases in Established Communities rental revenue in all six of our regions
for the three months ended March 31, 2007 as compared to the prior year period. The largest
increases in rental revenue were in the Pacific Northwest, the Midwest and Northern California,
with increases of 12.7%, 9.5% and 9.1%, respectively, between years. The Northeast and
Northern California regions comprise the majority of our Established Community revenue, and
therefore are discussed in more detail below.
Northern California, which represented approximately 24.4% of Established Community rental
revenue during the three months ended March 31, 2007, experienced an increase in rental revenue
of 9.1% as compared to the prior year period. Average rental rates increased by 9.4% to
$1,649, and economic occupancy decreased 0.3% to 96.9% for the three months ended March 31,
2007. Apartment fundamentals remain strong in Northern California and we expect Northern
California to see continued but moderating revenue growth during the remainder of 2007.
The Northeast region, which accounted for approximately 42.5% of Established Community rental
revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2007, experienced an increase in rental revenue of
4.0% for the three months ended March 31, 2007 as compared to the prior year period. Average
rental rates increased 4.4% to $2,100, and economic occupancy decreased 0.4% to 95.9% for the
three months ended March 31, 2007. We expect job growth in 2007 to increase slightly over the
growth levels experienced in 2006 in the Northeast and net supply to increase. However, we
expect overall apartment fundamentals will remain favorable, resulting in moderate rental rate
growth in the Northeast during the remainder of 2007. We expect that Northern New Jersey will lead the region
in revenue growth as a result of the strong apartment fundamentals in neighboring New York
City. However, we expect Boston, Massachusetts will lag the region in revenue growth, as the
positive impact of improving regional job growth will be largely
offset by new apartment deliveries.
In accordance with GAAP, cash concessions are amortized as an offset to rental revenue over the
approximate lease term, which is generally one year. As a supplemental measure, we also present
rental revenue with concessions stated on a cash basis to help investors evaluate the impact of
both current and historical concessions on GAAP based rental revenue and to more readily enable
comparisons to revenue as reported by other companies. Rental revenue with concessions stated on a
cash basis also allows investors to understand historical trends in cash concessions, as well as
current rental market conditions.
The following table reconciles total rental revenue in conformity with GAAP to total rental revenue
adjusted to state concessions on a cash basis for our Established Communities for the three months
ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 (dollars in thousands).
33
For the three months ended | ||||||||
3-31-07 | 3-31-06 | |||||||
Rental revenue (GAAP basis) |
$ | 159,507 | $ | 149,628 | ||||
Concessions amortized |
1,491 | 4,485 | ||||||
Concessions granted |
(1,424 | ) | (1,692 | ) | ||||
Rental revenue adjusted to state
concessions on a cash basis |
$ | 159,574 | $ | 152,421 | ||||
Year-over-year % change GAAP revenue |
6.6 | % | n/a | |||||
Year-over-year % change cash
concession based revenue |
4.7 | % | n/a |
Management, development and other fees increased for the three months ended March 31, 2007 due to
increased asset management, property management and redevelopment fees earned from the Fund, which
was formed in March 2005, and continues to grow through purchases, acquiring three more communities
in the three months ended March 31, 2007. In addition, construction and development fees earned
from unconsolidated entities for the three months ended March 31, 2007, contributed to increased
fee income.
Direct property operating expenses, excluding property taxes increased in the three months ended
March 31, 2007 as compared to the same period of 2006, primarily due to the addition of recently
developed and acquired apartment homes coupled with expense growth in our Established Communities.
For Established Communities, direct property operating expenses, excluding property taxes,
increased $1,708,000, or 4.9%, to $36,854,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2007 due
primarily to increases in payroll, utilities, marketing and other maintenance expenses. We
expect to see continued pressure on payroll and utilities in 2007, primarily as a result of
continued higher utility and payroll costs.
Property taxes increased for the three months ended March 31, 2007 over the prior year period
due to overall higher assessments and the addition of newly developed and redeveloped apartment
homes, and are impacted by the size and timing of successful tax appeals in both years.
For Established Communities, property taxes decreased by $375,000, or 2.6%, for the three
months ended March 31, 2007, due to the timing of successful tax appeals, partially offset by
overall higher assessments throughout all regions. Period over period changes are impacted by
the size and timing of successful tax appeals. We expect property taxes to
increase in 2007 as compared to 2006 to reflect increased valuations. However, property tax
increases are mitigated for communities in California, where increases in property taxes are
limited by law (Proposition 13). We evaluate property tax increases internally, as well as
engage third-party consultants, and appeal increases when appropriate.
Corporate-level property management and other indirect operating expenses decreased for the three
months ended March 31, 2007 over the prior year period due primarily to vacant staff
positions and decreased costs relating to corporate initiatives focused on increasing efficiency
and enhancing controls at our operating communities.
34
Investments and investment management reflects the costs incurred related to investment
acquisitions, investment management and abandoned pursuit costs, which include costs incurred on
development pursuits not yet considered probable for development, as well as the abandonment or
impairment of development pursuits, acquisition pursuits and disposition pursuits. Investments and
investment management increased for the three months ended March 31, 2007 as compared to the prior
year period due primarily to increased abandoned pursuit costs, as well as increased compensation
costs and increased staffing related to management of the Fund redevelopment activity. Abandoned
pursuit costs were $787,000 for the three months ended March 31,
2007 and $322,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2006. Abandoned pursuit costs can
be volatile, and the costs incurred in any given period may vary significantly in future periods.
Interest expense, net decreased for the three months ended March 31, 2007 as compared to the prior
year period due primarily to higher levels of capitalized interest in connection with our increased
development activity, lower average outstanding balances on our unsecured credit facility and
increased interest income. Interest income increased for the three months ended March 31, 2007 due
to higher invested cash balances as well as increases in the interest rate earned on cash deposits,
offset partially by interest income in 2006 from an escrow funded from a disposition in 2005 that
was used in a tax-deferred exchange.
Depreciation
expense increased for the three months ended March 31, 2007 as compared to the prior
year period primarily due to the completion of development and redevelopment activities.
General and administrative expense (G&A) increased for the three months ended March 31, 2007
relative to the prior year periods primarily due to the incurrence in 2007 of professional and
legal fees related to various litigation matters of approximately $450,000. We expect expensed
overhead costs, including G&A, corporate-level property management and investments and investment
management, to increase approximately 6.0% to 7.5% in 2007 as compared to 2006 in support of the
Companys continued growth.
Gain on sale of land in the three months ended March 31, 2007 represents the gain on sale of one
land parcel located in Kensington, Maryland. During the three months ended March 31, 2006, we sold
one land parcel located in the Northern New Jersey area.
Equity in income of unconsolidated entities for the three months ended March 31, 2007 decreased
from the prior year period due primarily to losses associated with two unconsolidated investments,
the consolidation in 2007 of a community that was not consolidated as of March 31, 2006, coupled
with the disposition of an investment in an unconsolidated entity in
the fourth quarter of 2006.
Minority interest in consolidated partnerships decreased for the three months ended March 31, 2007
as compared to the prior year period due to the conversion of limited partnership units, thereby
reducing outside ownership interests and the allocation of net income to outside ownership
interests.
Income from discontinued operations represents the net income generated by communities sold during
the period from January 1, 2006 through March 31, 2007. See Note 7, Real Estate Disposition
Activities, of our Consolidated Financial Statements.
Gain on sale of real estate assets decreased for the three months ended March 31, 2007 as compared
to the prior year period as there were no dispositions in the first quarter of 2007, as compared to
the disposition of two communities in the prior year period. The amount of gain realized in any
given reporting period depends on many factors, including the number of communities sold, the size
and carrying value of those communities and the sales prices, which are driven by local and
national market conditions.
Funds from Operations Attributable to Common Stockholders (FFO)
FFO is considered by management to be an appropriate supplemental measure of our operating and
financial performance. In calculating FFO, we exclude gains or losses related to dispositions of
previously depreciated property and exclude real estate depreciation. These amounts are generally
excluded in the industry definition of FFO as amounts can vary among owners of identical assets in
similar condition based on historical cost accounting and useful life estimates. FFO can help one
compare the operating performance of a real estate company between
35
periods or as compared to different companies. We believe that in order to understand our
operating results, FFO should be examined with net income as presented in our Consolidated
Financial Statements included elsewhere this report.
Consistent with the definition adopted by the Board of Governors of the National Association of
Real Estate Investment Trustsâ (NAREIT), we calculate FFO as net income or loss
computed in accordance with GAAP, adjusted for:
| gains or losses on sales of previously depreciated operating communities; | ||
| extraordinary gains or losses (as defined by GAAP); | ||
| depreciation of real estate assets; and | ||
| adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. |
FFO does not represent net income in accordance with GAAP, and therefore it should not be
considered an alternative to net income, which remains the primary measure, as an indication of
our performance. In addition, FFO as calculated by other REITs may not be comparable to our
calculation of FFO.
The following is a reconciliation of net income to FFO (dollars in thousands, except per share
data):
For the three months ended | ||||||||
3-31-06 | ||||||||
3-31-07 | (restated) | |||||||
Net income |
$ | 46,520 | $ | 111,114 | ||||
Dividends attributable to preferred stock |
(2,175 | ) | (2,175 | ) | ||||
Depreciation real estate assets, including discontinued
operations and joint venture adjustments |
44,685 | 40,570 | ||||||
Minority interest expense, including discontinued operations |
88 | 99 | ||||||
Gain on sale of operating communities |
| (65,419 | ) | |||||
Funds from operations attributable to common stockholders |
$ | 89,118 | $ | 84,189 | ||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding diluted |
79,930,748 | 75,290,124 | ||||||
EPS per common share diluted |
$ | 0.56 | $ | 1.45 | ||||
FFO per common share diluted |
$ | 1.11 | $ | 1.12 | ||||
FFO also does not represent cash generated from operating activities in accordance with GAAP, and
therefore should not be considered an alternative to net cash flows from operating activities, as
determined by GAAP, as a measure of liquidity. Additionally, it is not necessarily indicative of
cash available to fund cash needs.
A presentation of GAAP based cash flow metrics is as follows (dollars in thousands) and a
discussion of Liquidity and Capital Resources can be found below.
For the three months ended | ||||||||
3-31-06 | ||||||||
3-31-07 | (restated) | |||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
$ | 99,188 | $ | 73,912 | ||||
Net cash (used)/provided by investing activities |
$ | (285,266 | ) | $ | 85,133 | |||
Net cash provided by/(used) in financing activities |
$ | 533,946 | $ | (109,282 | ) | |||
36
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Factors affecting our liquidity and capital resources are our cash flows from operations, financing
activities and investing activities, as well as general economic and market conditions. Operating
cash flow has historically been determined by: (i) the number of apartment homes currently owned,
(ii) rental rates, (iii) occupancy levels and (iv) operating expenses with respect to apartment
homes. The timing, source and amount of cash flows provided by financing activities and used in
investing activities are sensitive to the capital markets environment, particularly to changes in
interest rates. The timing and type of capital markets activity in which we engage, as well as our
plans for development, redevelopment, acquisition and disposition activity, are affected by changes
in the capital markets environment, such as changes in interest rates or the availability of
cost-effective capital.
We regularly review our liquidity needs, the adequacy of cash flows from operations, and other
expected liquidity sources to meet these needs. We believe our principal short-term liquidity
needs are to fund:
| normal recurring operating expenses; | ||
| debt service and maturity payments; | ||
| preferred stock dividends and DownREIT partnership unit distributions; | ||
| the minimum dividend payments on our common stock required to maintain our REIT qualification under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986; | ||
| development and redevelopment activity in which we are currently engaged; and | ||
| capital calls for the Fund, as required. |
We anticipate that we can fully satisfy these needs from a combination of cash flow provided by
operating activities, proceeds from asset dispositions and borrowing capacity under our variable
rate unsecured credit facility, as well as other public or private sources of liquidity.
Cash and cash equivalents totaled $356,435,000 at March 31, 2007, an increase of $347,868,000 from
$8,567,000 at December 31, 2006. The following discussion relates to changes in cash due to
operating, investing and financing activities, which are presented in
our Condensed Consolidated Statements
of Cash Flows included elsewhere in this report.
Operating Activities Net cash provided by operating activities increased to $99,188,000 in the
three months ended March 31, 2007 from $73,912,000 in the three months ended March 31, 2006.
The increase was driven primarily by the additional NOI from our Established Communities
operations, as well as NOI from recently developed communities, partially offset by the loss of
NOI from the two communities sold in the first quarter of 2006, as discussed elsewhere in this
report.
Investing Activities Net cash used in investing activities of $285,266,000 in the three months
ended March 31, 2007 related to investments in assets through the development and redevelopment
of apartment communities and the acquisition of a land parcel, partially offset by proceeds
from the disposition of a land parcel. During the three months ended March 31, 2007, we
invested $292,005,000 in the purchase and development of the following real estate and capital
expenditures:
| We completed the development of two communities containing a total of 400 apartment homes for a total capitalized cost, including land acquisition cost, of $92,000,000. | ||
| We completed the redevelopment of one consolidated community containing 409 apartment homes for a total capitalized cost of $6,700,000, excluding costs incurred prior to redevelopment. | ||
| We acquired one parcel of land in connection with Development Rights, for an aggregate purchase price of $70,000,000. | ||
| We had capital expenditures relating to current communities real estate assets of $355,000 and non-real estate capital expenditures of $568,000. |
Financing Activities Net cash provided by financing activities totaled $533,946,000 in the
three months ended March 31, 2007. The net cash inflow is due primarily to the proceeds from
the issuance of 4,600,000 shares of the Companys common stock at $129.30 per share.
37
This
issuance was in conjunction with the inclusion of our common stock in the S&P 500 Index. In
addition, net cash provided by financing activities includes the issuance of common stock for
option exercises partially offset by the repayment of a secured mortgage loan, and dividends
paid. See Note 3, Notes Payable, Unsecured Notes and Credit Facility, and Note 4,
Stockholders Equity, of our Consolidated Financial Statements, for additional information.
Variable Rate Unsecured Credit Facility
We currently have a $650,000,000 revolving variable rate unsecured credit facility with a syndicate
of commercial banks. Under the terms of the credit facility, we may elect to increase the facility
up to $1,000,000,000, provided that one or more banks (from the syndicate or otherwise) voluntarily
agree to provide the additional commitment. No member of the syndicate of banks can prohibit such
an increase; such an increase in the facility will only be effective to the extent banks (from the
syndicate or otherwise) choose to commit to lend additional funds. We pay participating banks, in
the aggregate, an annual facility fee of approximately $813,000. The unsecured credit facility
bears interest at varying levels based on the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR), our credit
rating and on a maturity schedule selected by us. The current stated pricing is LIBOR plus 0.40%
per annum (5.72% on April 30, 2007). The spread over LIBOR can vary from LIBOR plus 0.325% to
LIBOR plus 1.00% based on our credit rating. In addition, a competitive bid option is available
for borrowings of up to $422,500,000. This option allows banks that are part of the lender
consortium to bid to provide us loans at a rate that is lower than the stated pricing provided by
the unsecured credit facility. The competitive bid option may result in lower pricing if market
conditions allow. We had no outstanding balance under this competitive bid option at April 30,
2007. We are subject to certain customary covenants under the unsecured credit facility,
including, but not limited to, maintaining certain maximum leverage ratios, a minimum fixed charges
coverage ratio and minimum unencumbered assets and equity levels. The credit facility matures in
November 2011, assuming our exercise of a one-year renewal option. At April 30, 2007, no amounts
were outstanding on the credit facility, $37,443,000 was used to provide letters of credit and
$612,557,000 was available for borrowing under the unsecured credit facility.
Future Financing and Capital Needs Debt Maturities
One of our principal long-term liquidity needs is the repayment of long-term debt at the time that
such debt matures. For unsecured notes, we anticipate that no significant portion of the principal
of these notes will be repaid prior to maturity. If we do not have funds on hand sufficient to
repay our indebtedness as it becomes due, it will be necessary for us to refinance the debt. This
refinancing may be accomplished by uncollateralized private or public debt offerings, additional
debt financing that is collateralized by mortgages on individual communities or groups of
communities, draws on our unsecured credit facility or by additional equity offerings. Although we
believe we will have the capacity to meet our long-term liquidity needs, we cannot assure you that
additional debt financing or debt or equity offerings will be available or, if available, that they
will be on terms we consider satisfactory.
38
The table below details debt maturities for the next five years, excluding our unsecured credit
facility, for debt outstanding at March 31, 2007 (dollars in thousands).
All-In | Principal | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
interest | maturity | Balance outstanding | Scheduled maturities | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Community | rate(1) | date | 12-31-06 | 3-31-07 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | Thereafter | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tax-exempt bonds |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fixed rate |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CountryBrook |
6.30 | % | Mar-2012 | $ | 15,990 | $ | 15,835 | $ | 479 | $ | 676 | $ | 719 | $ | 766 | $ | 816 | $ | 12,379 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Avalon at Symphony Glen |
4.90 | % | Jul-2024 | 9,780 | 9,780 | | | | | | 9,780 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Avalon View |
7.55 | % | Aug-2024 | 15,980 | | | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Avalon at Lexington |
6.55 | % | Feb-2025 | 12,467 | 12,372 | 272 | 415 | 441 | 469 | 498 | 10,277 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Avalon at Nob Hill |
5.80 | % | Jun-2025 | 18,116 | 18,017 | (2) | | | | | | 18,017 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Avalon Campbell |
6.48 | % | Jun-2025 | 32,776 | 32,557 | (2) | | | | | | 32,557 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Avalon Pacifica |
6.48 | % | Jun-2025 | 14,867 | 14,768 | (2) | | | | | | 14,768 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Avalon Knoll |
6.95 | % | Jun-2026 | 11,957 | 11,883 | 228 | 324 | 347 | 371 | 398 | 10,215 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Avalon Landing |
6.85 | % | Jun-2026 | 5,903 | 5,866 | 116 | 162 | 173 | 185 | 198 | 5,032 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Avalon Fields |
7.55 | % | May-2027 | 10,483 | 10,425 | 179 | 256 | 275 | 295 | 316 | 9,104 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Avalon West |
7.73 | % | Dec-2036 | 8,179 | 8,159 | 72 | 91 | 98 | 105 | 112 | 7,681 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Avalon Oaks |
7.45 | % | Jul-2041 | 17,205 | 17,174 | 98 | 137 | 147 | 157 | 168 | 16,467 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Avalon Oaks West |
7.48 | % | Apr-2043 | 17,036 | 17,007 | 89 | 125 | 133 | 142 | 152 | 16,367 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
190,739 | 173,843 | 1,533 | 2,186 | 2,333 | 2,490 | 2,658 | 162,644 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Variable rate (3)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Promenade |
5.46 | % | Oct-2010 | 31,495 | 31,495 | 651 | 701 | 755 | 29,388 | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Waterford |
4.07 | % | Jul-2014 | 33,100 | 33,100 | (4) | | | | | | 33,100 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Avalon at Mountain View |
4.07 | % | Feb-2017 | 18,300 | 18,300 | (4) | | | | | | 18,300 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Avalon at Foxchase I |
4.07 | % | Nov-2017 | 16,800 | 16,800 | (4) | | | | | | 16,800 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Avalon at Foxchase II |
4.07 | % | Nov-2017 | 9,600 | 9,600 | (4) | | | | | | 9,600 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Avalon at Mission Viejo |
4.61 | % | Jun-2025 | 7,635 | 7,635 | (4) | | | | | | 7,635 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Avalon at Nob Hill |
3.64 | % | Jun-2025 | 2,684 | 2,783 | (2) | | | | | | 2,783 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Avalon Campbell |
3.64 | % | Jun-2025 | 6,024 | 6,243 | (2) | | | | | | 6,243 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Avalon Pacifica |
3.64 | % | Jun-2025 | 2,733 | 2,832 | (2) | | | | | | 2,832 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bowery Place I |
3.92 | % | Nov-2037 | 93,800 | 93,800 | (5) | | 521 | 576 | 636 | 703 | 91,364 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bowery Place II |
3.96 | % | Nov-2039 | 48,500 | 48,500 | (5) | | | | 270 | 298 | 47,932 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Avalon Acton |
4.70 | % | Jul-2040 | 45,000 | 45,000 | (5) | | | | | | 45,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Avalon at Fairway Hills I |
4.63 | % | Jun-2026 | 11,500 | 11,500 | | | | | | 11,500 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
327,171 | 327,588 | 651 | 1,222 | 1,331 | 30,294 | 1,001 | 293,089 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Conventional loans (6) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fixed rate |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
$150 Million unsecured notes |
5.18 | % | Aug-2007 | 150,000 | 150,000 | 150,000 | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
$110 Million unsecured notes |
7.13 | % | Dec-2007 | 110,000 | 110,000 | 110,000 | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
$50 Million unsecured notes |
6.63 | % | Jan-2008 | 50,000 | 50,000 | | 50,000 | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
$146 Million unsecured notes |
8.38 | % | Jul-2008 | 146,000 | 146,000 | | 146,000 | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
$150 Million unsecured notes |
7.63 | % | Aug-2009 | 150,000 | 150,000 | | | 150,000 | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
$200 Million unsecured notes |
7.66 | % | Dec-2010 | 200,000 | 200,000 | | | | 200,000 | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
$300 Million unsecured notes |
6.79 | % | Sep-2011 | 300,000 | 300,000 | | | | | 300,000 | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
$50 Million unsecured notes |
6.31 | % | Sep-2011 | 50,000 | 50,000 | | | | | 50,000 | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
$250 Million unsecured notes |
6.26 | % | Nov-2012 | 250,000 | 250,000 | | | | | | 250,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
$100 Million unsecured notes |
5.11 | % | Mar-2013 | 100,000 | 100,000 | | | | | | 100,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
$150 Million unsecured notes |
5.52 | % | Apr-2014 | 150,000 | 150,000 | | | | | | 150,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
$250 million unsecured notes |
5.73 | % | Jan-2012 | 250,000 | 250,000 | | | | | | 250,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
$250 million unsecured notes |
5.89 | % | Sep-2016 | 250,000 | 250,000 | | | | | | 250,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Wheaton Development Right |
6.99 | % | Oct-2008 | 4,513 | 4,492 | 60 | 4,432 | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4600 Eisenhower Avenue |
8.08 | % | Apr-2009 | 4,402 | 4,375 | 82 | 118 | 4,175 | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Twinbrook Development Right |
7.25 | % | Oct-2011 | 8,200 | 8,137 | 130 | 207 | 222 | 239 | 7,339 | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Avalon at Tysons West |
5.55 | % | Jul-2028 | 6,535 | 6,496 | 117 | 162 | 173 | 183 | 193 | 5,668 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Avalon Orchards |
7.65 | % | Jul-2033 | 19,883 | 19,817 | 206 | 290 | 311 | 333 | 357 | 18,320 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2,199,533 | 2,199,317 | 260,595 | 201,209 | 154,881 | 200,755 | 357,889 | 1,023,988 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Variable rate (3)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Avalon Ledges |
6.69 | % | May-2009 | 18,635 | 18,425 | (4) | 601 | 688 | 17,136 | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Avalon at Flanders Hill |
6.69 | % | May-2009 | 21,245 | 21,005 | (4) | 686 | 784 | 19,535 | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Avalon at Newton Highlands |
6.63 | % | May-2009 | 37,650 | 37,330 | (4) | 1,226 | 1,397 | 34,707 | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Avalon at Crane Brook |
6.60 | % | Mar-2011 | 33,535 | 33,215 | (4) | 910 | 1,045 | 1,106 | 1,169 | 28,985 | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
111,065 | 109,975 | 3,423 | 3,914 | 72,484 | 1,169 | 28,985 | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total indebtedness excluding unsecured credit facility | $ | 2,828,508 | $ | 2,810,723 | $ | 266,202 | $ | 208,531 | $ | 231,029 | $ | 234,708 | $ | 390,533 | $ | 1,479,721 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
(1) | Includes credit enhancement fees, facility fees, trustees fees and other fees. | |
(2) | Financed by variable rate, tax-exempt debt, but the interest rate on a portion of this debt is effectively fixed at March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006 through a swap agreement. The portion of the debt fixed through a swap agreement decreases (and therefore the variable portion of the debt increases) monthly as payments are made to a principal reserve fund. | |
(3) | Variable rates are given as of March 31, 2007. | |
(4) | Financed by variable rate debt, but interest rate is capped through an interest rate protection agreement. | |
(5) | Represents full amount of the debt as of March 31, 2007. Actual amounts drawn on the debt as of March 31, 2007 are $83,276 for Bowery Place I, $1,602 for Bowery Place II and $0 for Avalon Acton. | |
(6) | Balances outstanding represent total amounts due at maturity, and are not net of $2,816 of debt discount as of March 31, 2007 and $2,922 of debt discount as of December 31, 2006, as reflected in unsecured notes on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets included elsewhere in this report. |
39
Future Financing and Capital Needs Portfolio and Other Activity
As of March 31, 2007, we had 16 new communities under construction, for which a total estimated
cost of $603,945,000 remained to be invested. In addition, we had six communities which we own, or
in which we have a direct or indirect interest, under reconstruction, for which a total estimated
cost of $10,784,000 remained to be invested. Substantially all of the capital expenditures
necessary to complete the communities currently under construction and reconstruction, as well as
development costs related to pursuing Development Rights, will be funded from:
| cash currently on hand invested in highly liquid overnight money market funds and repurchase agreements, and short term investment vehicles; | ||
| the remaining capacity under our current $650,000,000 unsecured credit facility; | ||
| the net proceeds from sales of existing communities; | ||
| retained operating cash; | ||
| the issuance of debt or equity securities (including proceeds from the recent stock offering); and/or | ||
| private equity funding. |
Before planned reconstruction activity, including reconstruction activity related to communities
acquired by the Fund as discussed below, or the construction of a Development Right begins, we
intend to arrange adequate financing to complete these undertakings, although we cannot assure you
that we will be able to obtain such financing. In the event that financing cannot be obtained, we
may have to abandon Development Rights, write-off associated pre-development costs that were
capitalized and/or forego reconstruction activity. In such instances, we will not realize the
increased revenues and earnings that we expected from such Development Rights or reconstruction
activity and significant losses could be incurred.
We have invested in the Fund, a private, discretionary investment vehicle that acquires and
operates apartment communities in our markets. The Fund will serve, until March 16, 2008 or until
all of its capital commitments have been invested or committed for investment, as the principal
vehicle through which we will invest in the acquisition of apartment communities, subject to
certain exceptions. These exceptions include significant individual asset and portfolio
acquisitions, properties acquired in tax-deferred transactions and acquisitions that are
inadvisable or inappropriate for the Fund. The Fund will not restrict our development activities,
and will terminate after a term of eight years, subject to two one-year extensions. The Fund has
nine institutional investors, including us, with a combined capital equity commitment of
$330,000,000. A significant portion of the investments made in the Fund by its investors are being
made through AvalonBay Value Added Fund, Inc., a Maryland corporation that qualifies as a REIT
under the Internal Revenue Code (the Fund REIT). A wholly owned subsidiary of the Company is the
general partner of the Fund and has committed $50,000,000 to the Fund and the Fund REIT (of which
approximately $22,944,000 has been invested as of April 30, 2007) representing a 15.2% combined
general partner and limited partner equity interest. As of April 30, 2007, the Fund has committed
to invest approximately $650,000,000, and has remaining capacity to invest approximately
$225,000,000. Based on our prior experience, our acquisition pipeline and current market
conditions, we expect that the Fund will be fully invested or committed to invest by 2008. We are
exploring various potential sources for funding future acquisitions after the Fund is fully
invested, including a vehicle which, like the Fund, would serve during its term as the exclusive
vehicle through which we would acquire apartment communities, subject to certain exceptions.
From time to time we use joint ventures to hold or develop individual real estate assets. We
generally employ joint ventures primarily to mitigate asset concentration or market risk or
secondarily as a source of liquidity. We may also use joint ventures related to mixed-use land
development opportunities where our partners bring development and operational expertise to the
venture. Each joint venture or partnership agreement has been and will continue to be individually
negotiated, and our ability to operate and/or dispose of a community in our sole discretion may be
limited to varying degrees depending on the terms of the joint venture or partnership agreement.
However, we cannot assure you that we will achieve our objectives through joint ventures.
40
In evaluating our allocation of capital within our markets, we sell assets that do not meet our
long-term investment criteria or when capital and real estate markets allow us to realize a portion
of the value created over the past business cycle and redeploy the proceeds from those sales to
develop and redevelop communities. Because the proceeds from the sale of communities may not be
immediately redeployed into revenue generating assets, the immediate effect of a sale of a
community for a gain is to increase net income, but reduce future total revenues, total expenses
and NOI. However, we believe that the absence of future cash flows from communities sold will have
a minimal impact on our ability to fund future liquidity and capital resource needs.
Off Balance Sheet Arrangements
In addition to the investment interests in consolidated and unconsolidated real estate entities, we
have certain off-balance sheet arrangements with the entities in which we invest. Additional
discussion of these entities can be found in Note 6, Investments in Unconsolidated Entities, and
Note 8, Commitments and Contingencies, of our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements located elsewhere
in this report.
| CVP I, LLC has outstanding tax-exempt, variable rate bonds maturing in November 2036 in the amount of $117,000,000, which have permanent credit enhancement. We have agreed to guarantee, under limited circumstances, the repayment to the credit enhancer of any advances it may make in fulfillment of CVP I, LLCs repayment obligations under the bonds. We have also guaranteed to the credit enhancer that CVP I, LLC will obtain a final certificate of occupancy for the project (Chrystie Place in New York City) overall once tenant improvements related to a retail tenant are complete, which is expected in 2007. Our 80% partner in this venture has agreed that it will reimburse us its pro rata share of any amounts paid relative to these guaranteed obligations. The estimated fair value of, and our obligation under these guarantees, both at inception and as of March 31, 2007 were not significant. As a result we have not recorded any obligation associated with these guarantees at March 31, 2007. | ||
| MVP I, LLC has a construction loan in the amount of $94,400,000 (of which $83,916,000 is outstanding as of March 31, 2007), which matures in September 2010, assuming exercise of two one-year renewal options, and is payable by the unconsolidated real estate entity. In connection with the construction management services that we provided to MVP I, LLC, the entity that owns and developed Avalon at Mission Bay North II in San Francisco, we have provided a construction completion guarantee to the lender in order to fulfill their standard financing requirements related to the construction financing. Construction was completed in 2006, and our obligations under this guarantee will terminate once all of the lenders standard completion requirements have been satisfied, which we currently expect to occur in 2007. The estimated fair value of and our obligation under this guarantee, both at inception and as of March 31, 2007 was not significant and therefore no liability has been recorded related to this construction completion guarantee as of March 31, 2007. | ||
| The Fund has 13 mortgage loans with amounts outstanding in the aggregate of $271,701,000. These mortgage loans have varying maturity dates (or dates after which the loans can be prepaid), ranging from October 2011 to October 2014. These mortgage loans are secured by the underlying real estate. In addition, the Fund had amounts outstanding of $187,400,000 as of March 31, 2007 under its credit facilitates. These borrowings include $139,400,000 in borrowings under the Funds credit facility secured by uncalled capital commitments maturing in January 2008 and $48,000,000 in borrowings under a separate unsecured credit facility maturing in December 2008. The mortgage loans and the credit facility are payable by the Fund with operating cash flow from the underlying real estate, and the credit facility is secured by capital commitments. We have not guaranteed the debt of the Fund, nor do we have any obligation to fund this debt should the Fund be unable to do so. |
41
In addition, as part of the formation of the Fund, we have provided to one of the limited partners a guarantee. The guarantee provides that if, upon final liquidation of the Fund, the total amount of all distributions to that partner during the life of the Fund (whether from operating cash flow or property sales) does not equal a minimum of the total capital contributions made by that partner, then we will pay the partner an amount equal to the shortfall, but in no event more than 10% of the total capital contributions made by the partner (maximum of approximately $3,400,000 as of March 31, 2007). As of March 31, 2007, the fair value of the real estate assets owned by the Fund is considered adequate to cover such potential payment to that partner under a liquidation scenario. The estimated fair value of, and our obligation under this guarantee, both at inception and as of March 31, 2007 was not significant and therefore we have not recorded any obligation for this guarantee as of March 31, 2007. | |||
| In connection with the pursuit of a Development Right in Pleasant Hill, California, $125,000,000 in bond financing was issued by the Contra Costa County Redevelopment Agency (the Agency) in connection with the possible future construction of a multifamily rental community by PHVP I, LLC. The bond proceeds were immediately invested in their entirety in a guaranteed investment contract (GIC) administered by a trustee. This Development Right is planned as a mixed-use development, with residential, for-sale, retail and office components. The bond proceeds will remain in the GIC until at least June 1, 2007, but no later than December 5, 2007, at which time a loan will be made to PHVP I, LLC to fund construction of the multifamily portion of the development, or the bonds will be redeemed by the Agency. Although we do not have any equity or economic interest in PHVP I, LLC at this time, we do have an option to make a capital contribution to PHVP I, LLC in exchange for a 99% general partner interest in the entity. Should we decide not to exercise this option, the bonds will be redeemed, and a loan will not be made to PHVP I, LLC. The bonds are payable from the proceeds of the GIC and are non-recourse to both PHVP I, LLC and to us. There is no loan payable outstanding by PHVP I, LLC as of March 31, 2007. | ||
In addition, as part of providing construction management services to PHVP I, LLC for the construction of a public garage, we have provided a construction completion guarantee to the related lender in order to fulfill their standard financing requirements related to the garage construction financing. Our obligations under this guarantee will terminate following construction completion of the garage once all of the lenders standard completion requirements have been satisfied, which we currently expect to occur in 2008. In the third quarter of 2006, significant modifications were requested by the local transit authority to change the garage structure design. We do not believe that the requested design changes impact the construction schedule. However, it is expected that these changes will increase the original budget by an amount up to $5,000,000. We believe that substantially all potential additional amounts are reimbursable from unrelated third parties. At this time we do not believe that it is probable that we will incur any additional costs. The estimated fair value of, and our obligation under this guarantee, both at inception and as of March 31, 2007 was not significant and therefore we have not recorded any obligation for this guarantee as of March 31, 2007. | |||
| In the fourth quarter of 2006, we admitted a 70% venture partner to the Avalon Del Rey Apartments, LLC for an investment of $49,000,000, including the assumption of debt. In conjunction with this investment, we provided an operating guarantee to the joint venture partner. This guarantee provides that if the initial year return earned by the joint venture partner is less than a threshold return of 7% on its initial equity investment, we will pay the joint venture partner an amount equal to the shortfall, up to the 7% threshold return required. As of March 31, 2007, the cash flows and expected return on investment of the community are expected to meet and exceed the initial year threshold return required by our joint venture partner. Therefore we have not recorded any liability associated with this guarantee as of March 31, 2007. |
There are no other lines of credit, side agreements, financial guarantees or any other derivative
financial instruments related to or between our unconsolidated real estate entities and us. In
evaluating our capital structure and overall leverage, management takes into consideration our
proportionate share of this unconsolidated debt.
42
Contractual Obligations
We currently have contractual obligations consisting primarily of long-term debt obligations and
lease obligations for certain land parcels and regional and administrative office space. There
have not been any material changes outside the ordinary course of business to our contractual
obligations during the three months ended March 31, 2007.
Development Communities
As of March 31, 2007, we had 16 Development Communities under construction. We expect these
Development Communities, when completed, to add a total of 5,049 apartment homes to our portfolio
for a total projected capitalized cost, including land acquisition costs and portions owned by
joint venture partners, of approximately $1,358,500,000. We
anticipate the expected total capital cost of
Development Communities under construction will be between
$1,500,000,000 and $2,000,000,000 by the end of 2007. You should
carefully review the discussion under Item 1a., Risk Factors, of our Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2006 for a discussion of the risks associated with development activity.
The following table presents a summary of the Development Communities. We hold a direct or
indirect fee simple ownership interest in these communities except where noted.
Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of | capitalized | |||||||||||||||||||||||
apartment | cost(1) | Construction | Initial | Estimated | Estimated | |||||||||||||||||||
homes | ($ millions) | start | occupancy(2) | completion | stabilization(3) | |||||||||||||||||||
1. Avalon Wilshire |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Los Angeles, CA |
123 | $ | 46.6 | Q1 2005 | Q2 2007 | Q3 2007 | Q4 2007 | |||||||||||||||||
2. Avalon Lyndhurst (4) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lyndhurst, NJ |
328 | 78.8 | Q3 2005 | Q4 2006 | Q4 2007 | Q2 2008 | ||||||||||||||||||
3. Avalon Shrewsbury |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shrewsbury, MA |
251 | 36.1 | Q3 2005 | Q2 2006 | Q2 2007 | Q4 2007 | ||||||||||||||||||
4. Avalon Riverview North |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
New York, NY |
602 | 175.6 | Q3 2005 | Q3 2007 | Q3 2008 | Q1 2009 | ||||||||||||||||||
5. Avalon at Glen Cove North |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Glen Cove, NY |
111 | 41.4 | Q4 2005 | Q1 2007 | Q3 2007 | Q1 2008 | ||||||||||||||||||
6. Avalon Danvers |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Danvers, MA |
433 | 84.8 | Q4 2005 | Q1 2007 | Q2 2008 | Q4 2008 | ||||||||||||||||||
7. Avalon Woburn |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Woburn, MA |
446 | 83.1 | Q4 2005 | Q3 2006 | Q1 2008 | Q3 2008 | ||||||||||||||||||
8. Avalon on the Sound II |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
New Rochelle, NY |
588 | 184.2 | Q1 2006 | Q2 2007 | Q3 2008 | Q1 2009 | ||||||||||||||||||
9. Avalon Meydenbauer |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bellevue, WA |
368 | 84.3 | Q1 2006 | Q4 2007 | Q3 2008 | Q1 2009 | ||||||||||||||||||
10. Avalon at Dublin Station I |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dublin, CA |
305 | 85.8 | Q2 2006 | Q3 2007 | Q2 2008 | Q4 2008 | ||||||||||||||||||
11. Avalon at Lexington Hills |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lexington, MA |
387 | 86.2 | Q2 2006 | Q2 2007 | Q3 2008 | Q1 2009 | ||||||||||||||||||
12. Avalon Bowery Place II (5) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
New York, NY |
90 | 61.9 | Q3 2006 | Q4 2007 | Q1 2008 | Q2 2008 | ||||||||||||||||||
13. Avalon Encino |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Los Angeles, CA |
131 | 61.5 | Q3 2006 | Q3 2008 | Q4 2008 | Q1 2009 | ||||||||||||||||||
14. Avalon Canoga Park |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Canoga Park, CA |
210 | 53.9 | Q4 2006 | Q1 2008 | Q2 2008 | Q4 2008 | ||||||||||||||||||
15. Avalon Acton (5) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Acton, MA |
380 | 68.8 | Q4 2006 | Q1 2008 | Q4 2008 | Q2 2009 | ||||||||||||||||||
16. Avalon Morningside Park (5) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
New York, NY |
296 | 125.5 | Q1 2007 | Q3 2008 | Q1 2009 | Q3 2009 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total |
5,049 | $ | 1,358.5 | |||||||||||||||||||||
(1) | Total capitalized cost includes all capitalized costs projected to be or actually incurred to develop the respective Development Community, determined in accordance with GAAP, including land acquisition costs, construction costs, real estate taxes, capitalized interest and loan fees, permits, professional fees, allocated development overhead and other regulatory fees. Total capitalized cost for |
43
communities identified as having joint venture ownership, either during construction or upon construction completion, represents the total projected joint venture contribution amount. | ||
(2) | Future initial occupancy dates are estimates. | |
(3) | Stabilized operations are defined as the earlier of (i) attainment of 95% or greater physical occupancy or (ii) the one-year anniversary of completion of development. | |
(4) | The remediation of the Companys Avalon Lyndhurst development site, as discussed in the Companys second quarter 2006 Earnings Release, is substantially complete. The net cost associated with this remediation effort after considering insurance proceeds received to date, including costs associated with construction delays, is expected to total approximately $6.0 million,. The Company is pursuing the recovery of these additional costs through insurance as well as from the third parties involved, but any additional recoverable amounts are not currently estimable. The total capitalized cost and yield cited above do not reflect the potential impact of these additional net costs. | |
(5) | This community is being financed in part by third-party tax-exempt debt. |
Redevelopment Communities
As of March 31, 2007, we had two consolidated communities under redevelopment. We expect the total
capitalized cost to redevelop these communities to be approximately $18,900,000, excluding costs
prior to redevelopment. In addition, the Fund has four communities under redevelopment. We have
found that the cost to redevelop an existing apartment community is more difficult to budget and
estimate than the cost to develop a new community. Accordingly, we expect that actual costs may
vary from our budget by a wider range than for a new development community. We cannot assure you
that we will meet our schedule for reconstruction completion or restabilized operations, or that we
will meet our budgeted costs, either individually or in the aggregate. We anticipate increasing
our redevelopment activity related to Fund-owned communities, as well as communities in our current
operating portfolio. You should carefully review the discussion under Item 1a., Risk Factors, of
our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 for a discussion of risks associated with
redevelopment activity.
The following presents a summary of Redevelopment Communities which also includes redevelopment
activity of the Fund:
Total cost | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of | ($ millions) | Estimated | Estimated | |||||||||||||||||||||
apartment | Pre-redevelopment | Total capitalized | Reconstruction | reconstruction | restabilized | |||||||||||||||||||
homes | cost | cost(1) | start | completion | operations(2) | |||||||||||||||||||
1. Avalon Walk I and II (3) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hamden, CT |
764 | 59.4 | 71.2 | Q1 2006 | Q4 2007 | Q2 2008 | ||||||||||||||||||
2. Avalon at AutumnWoods |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fairfax, VA |
420 | 31.2 | 38.3 | Q3 2006 | Q3 2008 | Q1 2009 | ||||||||||||||||||
3. Avalon Redmond (4) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Redmond, WA |
400 | 49.2 | 56.7 | Q2 2006 | Q4 2007 | Q2 2008 | ||||||||||||||||||
4. Civic Center Place |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Norwalk, CA |
192 | 38.1 | 43.5 | Q4 2006 | Q2 2008 | Q4 2008 | ||||||||||||||||||
5. Avalon at Poplar Creek |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Schaumburg, IL |
196 | 25.2 | 28.6 | Q4 2006 | Q1 2008 | Q3 2008 | ||||||||||||||||||
6. Fuller Martel |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Los Angeles, CA |
82 | 17.9 | 21.3 | Q1 2007 | Q1 2008 | Q3 2008 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total |
2,054 | $ | 221.0 | $ | 259.6 | |||||||||||||||||||
(1) | Total capitalized cost includes all capitalized costs projected to be incurred to redevelop the respective Redevelopment Community, including costs to acquire the community, reconstruction costs, real estate taxes, capitalized interest and loan fees, permits, professional fees, allocated redevelopment overhead and other regulatory fees determined in accordance with GAAP. | |
(2) | Restabilized operations are defined as the earlier of (i) attainment of 95% or greater physical occupancy or (ii) the one-year anniversary of completion of redevelopment. | |
(3) | This community was developed by a predecessor of the Company. Phase I was completed in Q3 1992 and Phase II was completed in Q3 1994. |
44
(4) | This community, formerly known as Ravenswood at the Park, was acquired in Q4 2004 and was transferred to a subsidiary of the Companys Investment Management Fund (the Fund) in Q1 2005, reducing the Companys indirect equity interest in the community to 15%. |
Development Rights
As of March 31, 2007, we were evaluating the future development of 56 new apartment communities on
land that is either owned by us, under contract, subject to a leasehold interest or for which we
hold a purchase option. We prefer to hold Development Rights through options to acquire land,
although for 21 of the Development Rights we currently own the land on which a community would be
built if we proceeded with development. The Development Rights range from those beginning design
and architectural planning to those that have completed site plans and drawings and can begin
construction almost immediately. We estimate that the successful completion of all of these
communities would ultimately add 14,809 apartment homes to our portfolio. Substantially all of
these apartment homes will offer features like those offered by the communities we currently own.
At March 31, 2007, there were cumulative capitalized costs (including legal fees, design fees and
related overhead costs, but excluding land costs) of $38,932,000 relating to Development Rights
that we consider probable for future development. In addition, land costs related to the pursuit
of Development Rights (consisting of original land and additional
carrying costs) of $315,241,000
are reflected as land held for development on the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet
as of March 31, 2007.
The properties comprising the Development Rights are in different stages of the due diligence and
regulatory approval process. The decisions as to which of the Development Rights to invest in, if
any, or to continue to pursue once an investment in a Development Right is made, are business
judgments that we make after we perform financial, demographic and other analyses. In the event
that we do not proceed with a Development Right, we generally would not recover capitalized costs
incurred in the pursuit of those communities, unless we were to recover amounts in connection with
the sale of land; however, we cannot guarantee a recovery. Pre-development costs incurred in the
pursuit of Development Rights for which future development is not yet considered probable are
expensed as incurred. In addition, if the status of a Development Right changes, deeming future
development no longer probable, any capitalized pre-development costs are written-off with a charge
to expense.
You should
carefully review the discussion under Item 1a., Risk
Factors, of our Form 10-K/A for the
year ended December 31, 2006 for a discussion of risks associated with Development Rights we are
currently pursuing.
45
Total | ||||||||||||||||
Estimated | capitalized | |||||||||||||||
number | cost | |||||||||||||||
Location | of homes | ($ millions)(1) | ||||||||||||||
1. | White Plains, NY |
(2 | ) | 393 | $ | 155 | ||||||||||
2. | Tinton Falls, NJ |
216 | 41 | |||||||||||||
3. | San Diego, CA |
(2 | ) | 161 | 65 | |||||||||||
4. | Hingham, MA |
(2 | ) | 235 | 48 | |||||||||||
5. | Union City, CA |
(2 | ) | 438 | 120 | |||||||||||
6. | Sharon, MA |
156 | 26 | |||||||||||||
7. | Coram, NY |
(2 | ) | 200 | 47 | |||||||||||
8. | Norwalk, CT |
319 | 83 | |||||||||||||
9. | Andover, MA |
(2 | ) | 115 | 21 | |||||||||||
10. | Brooklyn, NY |
(2 | ) | 628 | 317 | |||||||||||
11. | Wilton, CT |
(2 | ) | 100 | 24 | |||||||||||
12. | Pleasant Hill, CA |
(4 | ) | 416 | 153 | |||||||||||
13. | Cohasset, MA |
(2 | ) | 200 | 38 | |||||||||||
14. | Kirkland, WA Phase II |
(2 | ) | 181 | 60 | |||||||||||
15. | Northborough, MA |
350 | 60 | |||||||||||||
16. | New York, NY II |
680 | 261 | |||||||||||||
17. | Dublin, CA Phase II |
200 | 52 | |||||||||||||
18. | Dublin, CA Phase III |
205 | 53 | |||||||||||||
19. | Irvine, CA III |
170 | 73 | |||||||||||||
20. | Bellevue, WA |
385 | 126 | |||||||||||||
21. | Bloomingdale, NJ |
173 | 38 | |||||||||||||
22. | Camarillo, CA |
376 | 55 | |||||||||||||
23. | Seattle, WA |
202 | 65 | |||||||||||||
24. | North Bergen, NJ |
(3 | ) | 156 | 48 | |||||||||||
25. | Howell, NJ |
265 | 42 | |||||||||||||
26. | Quincy, MA |
(2 | ) | 146 | 24 | |||||||||||
27. | West Long Branch, NJ |
(3 | ) | 216 | 36 | |||||||||||
28. | Shelton, CT |
302 | 49 | |||||||||||||
29. | Canoga Park, CA |
(2 | ) | 297 | 85 | |||||||||||
30. | Irvine, CA |
(2 | ) | 280 | 76 | |||||||||||
31. | Shelton, CT II |
171 | 34 | |||||||||||||
32. | Greenburgh, NY Phase II |
444 | 112 | |||||||||||||
33. | San Francisco, CA |
157 | 50 | |||||||||||||
34. | Highland Park, NJ |
285 | 67 | |||||||||||||
35. | Brooklyn, NY II |
550 | 284 | |||||||||||||
36. | Gaithersburg, MD |
254 | 41 | |||||||||||||
37. | Milford, CT |
(2 | ) | 284 | 45 | |||||||||||
38. | Plymouth, MA Phase II |
69 | 17 | |||||||||||||
39. | Stratford, CT |
(2 | ) | 146 | 23 | |||||||||||
40. | Saddle Brook, NJ |
300 | 55 | |||||||||||||
41. | Oyster Bay, NY |
(2 | ) | 150 | 42 | |||||||||||
42. | West Haven, CT |
170 | 23 | |||||||||||||
43. | Randolph, NJ |
115 | 31 | |||||||||||||
44. | Hackensack, NJ |
210 | 47 | |||||||||||||
45. | Garden City, NY |
160 | 58 | |||||||||||||
46. | Yonkers, NY |
400 | 88 | |||||||||||||
47. | Roselle Park, NJ |
300 | 70 | |||||||||||||
48. | Irvine, CA II |
180 | 57 | |||||||||||||
49. | Alexandria, VA |
(2 | ) | 283 | 73 | |||||||||||
50. | Tysons Corner, VA |
(2 | ) | 439 | 101 | |||||||||||
51. | Oakland, NJ |
308 | 62 | |||||||||||||
52. | Plainview, NY |
160 | 38 | |||||||||||||
53. | Wheaton, MD |
(2 | ) | 320 | 56 | |||||||||||
54. | Wanaque, NJ |
210 | 45 | |||||||||||||
55. | Yaphank, NY |
(2 | ) | 343 | 57 | |||||||||||
56. | Rockville, MD |
(2 | ) | 240 | 46 | |||||||||||
14,809 | 3,963 | |||||||||||||||
46
(1) | Total capitalized cost includes all capitalized costs incurred to date (if any) and projected to be incurred to develop the respective community, determined in accordance with GAAP, including land acquisition costs, construction costs, real estate taxes, capitalized interest and loan fees, permits, professional fees, allocated development overhead and other regulatory fees. | |
(2) | We own the land parcel, but construction has not yet begun. | |
(3) | This community will be subject to a joint venture ownership structure. | |
(4) | This Development Right is subject to a joint venture arrangement. In connection with the pursuit of this Development Right, $125 million in bond financing was issued and immediately invested in a guaranteed investment contract (GIC) administered by a trustee. The Company does not have any equity or economic interest in the joint venture entity at this time, but has an option to make a capital contribution to the joint venture entity for a 99% general partner interest. Should the Company exercise this option, the bond proceeds will be released from the GIC and used for future construction of the Development Right. Should the Company decide not to exercise this option, the bond proceeds will be redeemed to the issuer. |
Insurance and Risk of Uninsured Losses
We carry commercial general liability insurance and property insurance with respect to all of our
communities. These policies, and other insurance policies we carry, have policy specifications,
insured limits and deductibles that we consider commercially reasonable. There are, however,
certain types of losses (such as losses arising from acts of war) that are not insured, in full or
in part, because they are either uninsurable or the cost of insurance makes it, in managements
view, economically impractical. You should carefully review the discussion under Item 1a., Risk
Factors, of our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 for a discussion of risks
associated with an uninsured property or liability loss.
Many of our West Coast communities are located in the general vicinity of active earthquake faults.
A large concentration of our communities lie near, and thus are susceptible to, the major fault
lines in California, including the San Andreas Fault and the Hayward fault. We cannot assure you
that an earthquake would not cause damage or losses greater than insured levels. We have in place
with respect to communities located in California, for any single occurrence and in the aggregate,
$75,000,000 of coverage with a deductible per building equal to five percent of the insured value
of that building. The five percent deductible is subject to a minimum of $100,000 per occurrence.
Earthquake coverage outside of California is subject to a $100,000,000 limit, except with respect
to the state of Washington, for which the limit is $65,000,000. Our earthquake insurance outside
of California provides for a $100,000 deductible per occurrence. In addition, up to a policy
aggregate of $2,000,000, the next $400,000 of loss per occurrence outside California will be
treated as an additional deductible.
We renewed our property insurance policy on May 1, 2007 and the insurance coverage provided for in
these renewal policies and related premiums did not materially change from the preceding year. Our annual general
liability policy and workmans compensation coverage renewed on August 1, 2006. We expect to
complete our negotiations with the incumbent carrier in July of this year, and cannot currently
estimate the level of the premium change or coverage.
Just as with office buildings, transportation systems and government buildings, there have been
reports that apartment communities could become targets of terrorism. In December 2005, Congress
passed the Terrorism Risk Insurance Extension Act (TRIEA) which is designed to make terrorism
insurance available. In connection with this legislation, we have purchased insurance for property
damage due to terrorism up to $200,000,000. Additionally, we have purchased insurance for certain
terrorist acts, not covered under TRIEA, such as domestic-based terrorism. This insurance, often
referred to as non-certified terrorism insurance, is subject to deductibles, limits and
exclusions. Our general liability policy provides TRIEA coverage (subject to deductibles and
insured limits) for liability to third parties that result from terrorist acts at our communities.
TRIEA is scheduled to expire on December 31, 2007. It is uncertain if Congress will extend this
act and continue to provide federal support for terrorism insurance. If Congress does not extend
TRIEA, the cost and availability of terrorism insurance may be in question.
Mold growth may occur when excessive moisture accumulates in buildings or on building materials,
particularly if the moisture problem remains undiscovered or is not addressed over a period of
time. Although the occurrence of mold at multifamily and other structures, and the need to
remediate such mold, is not a new phenomenon, there has been increased awareness in recent years
that certain molds may in some instances lead to adverse health effects,
47
including allergic or
other reactions. To help limit mold growth, we educate residents about the importance of adequate
ventilation and request or require that they notify us when they see mold or excessive moisture.
We have established procedures for promptly addressing and remediating mold or excessive moisture
from apartment homes when we become aware of its presence regardless of whether we or the resident
believe a health risk is present. However, we cannot assure that mold or excessive moisture will
be detected and remediated in a timely manner. If a significant mold problem arises at one of our
communities, we could be required to undertake a costly remediation program to contain or remove
the mold from the affected community and could be exposed to other liabilities. We cannot assure
that we will have coverage under our existing policies for property damage or liability to third
parties arising as a result of exposure to mold or a claim of exposure to mold at one of our
communities.
Inflation and Deflation
Substantially all of our apartment leases are for a term of one year or less. In an inflationary
environment, this may allow us to realize increased rents upon renewal of existing leases or the
beginning of new leases. Short-term leases generally minimize our risk from the adverse effects of
inflation, although these leases generally permit residents to leave at the end of the lease term
and therefore expose us to the effect of a decline in market rents. In a deflationary rent
environment, we may be exposed to declining rents more quickly under these shorter-term leases.
Forward-Looking Statements
This Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements as that term is defined under the Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. You can identify forward-looking statements by our use
of the words believe, expect, anticipate, intend, estimate, assume, project, plan,
may, shall, will and other similar expressions in this Form 10-Q, that predict or indicate
future events and trends and that do not report historical matters. These statements include,
among other things, statements regarding our intent, belief or expectations with respect to:
| our potential development, redevelopment, acquisition or disposition of communities; | ||
| the timing and cost of completion of apartment communities under construction, reconstruction, development or redevelopment; | ||
| the timing of lease-up, occupancy and stabilization of apartment communities; | ||
| the pursuit of land on which we are considering future development; | ||
| the anticipated operating performance of our communities; | ||
| cost, yield and earnings estimates; | ||
| our declaration or payment of distributions; | ||
| our joint venture and discretionary fund activities; | ||
| our policies regarding investments, indebtedness, acquisitions, dispositions, financings and other matters; | ||
| our qualification as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code; | ||
| the real estate markets in Northern and Southern California and markets in selected states in the Mid-Atlantic, Northeast, Midwest and Pacific Northwest regions of the United States and in general; | ||
| the availability of debt and equity financing; | ||
| interest rates; | ||
| general economic conditions; and | ||
| trends affecting our financial condition or results of operations. |
We cannot assure the future results or outcome of the matters described in these statements;
rather, these statements merely reflect our current expectations of the approximate outcomes of the
matters discussed. You should not rely on forward-looking statements because they involve known and
unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, some of which are beyond our control. These risks,
uncertainties and other factors may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to differ
materially from the anticipated future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by
these forward-looking statements. You should carefully review the discussion under Item 1a, Risk
Factors, of our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 for a discussion of risks
associated with forward-looking statements.
48
In addition, these forward-looking statements represent our estimates and assumptions only as of
the date of this report. We do not undertake a duty to update these forward-looking statements,
and therefore they may not represent our estimates and assumptions after the date of this report.
Some of the factors that could cause our actual results, performance or achievements to differ
materially from those expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements include, but are not
limited to, the following:
| we may fail to secure development opportunities due to an inability to reach agreements with third parties to obtain land at attractive prices or to obtain desired zoning and other local approvals; | ||
| we may abandon or defer development opportunities for a number of reasons, including changes in local market conditions which make development less desirable, increases in costs of development and increases in the cost of capital, resulting in losses; | ||
| construction costs of a community may exceed our original estimates; | ||
| we may not complete construction and lease-up of communities under development or redevelopment on schedule, resulting in increased interest costs and construction costs and a decrease in our expected rental revenues; | ||
| occupancy rates and market rents may be adversely affected by competition and local economic and market conditions which are beyond our control; | ||
| financing may not be available on favorable terms or at all, and our cash flows from operations and access to cost effective capital may be insufficient for the development of our pipeline which could limit our pursuit of opportunities; | ||
| our cash flows may be insufficient to meet required payments of principal and interest, and we may be unable to refinance existing indebtedness or the terms of such refinancing may not be as favorable as the terms of existing indebtedness; | ||
| we may be unsuccessful in our management of the Fund and the Fund REIT; and | ||
| we may be unsuccessful in managing changes in our portfolio composition. |
Critical Accounting Policies
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles (GAAP) requires management to use judgment in the application of accounting policies,
including making estimates and assumptions. If our judgment or interpretation of the facts and
circumstances relating to various transactions had been different, or different estimates or
assumptions had been made, it is possible that different accounting policies would have been
applied, resulting in different financial results or a different presentation of our financial
statements. Below is a discussion of a number of accounting policies that we consider critical to
an understanding of our financial condition and operating results that may require complex judgment
in their application or require estimates about matters which are inherently uncertain. A
discussion of our significant accounting policies, including further discussion of the accounting
policies described below, can be found in Note 1, Organization and Significant Accounting
Policies of our Consolidated Financial Statements.
Revenue Recognition
Rental income related to leases is recognized on an accrual basis when due from residents in
accordance with SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104, Revenue Recognition and Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 13, Accounting for Leases. In accordance with our standard
lease terms, rental payments are generally due on a monthly basis. Any cash concessions given at
the inception of the lease are amortized over the approximate life of the lease, which is generally
one year. A discussion regarding the impact of cash concessions on rental revenue for Established
Communities can be found in Results of Operations.
49
Cost Capitalization
We capitalize costs during the development of assets (including interest and related loan fees,
property taxes and other direct and indirect costs) beginning when development efforts commence
until the asset, or a portion of the asset, is delivered and is ready for its intended use, which
is generally indicated by the issuance of a certificate of occupancy. We capitalize costs during
redevelopment of apartment homes (including interest and related loan fees, property taxes and
other direct and indirect costs) beginning when an apartment home is taken out-of-service for
redevelopment until the apartment home redevelopment is completed and the apartment home is
available for a new resident. Rental income and operating expenses incurred during the initial
lease-up or post-redevelopment lease-up period are fully recognized as they accrue.
We capitalize pre-development costs incurred in pursuit of Development Rights for which we
currently believe future development is probable. These costs include legal fees, design fees and
related overhead costs. Future development of these Development Rights is dependent upon various
factors, including zoning and regulatory approval, rental market conditions, construction costs and
availability of capital. Pre-development costs incurred in the pursuit of Development Rights for
which future development is not yet considered probable are expensed as incurred. In addition, if
the status of a Development Right changes, making future development no longer probable, any
capitalized pre-development costs are written-off with a charge to expense.
We generally capitalize only non-recurring expenditures. We capitalize improvements and upgrades
only if the item: (i) exceeds $15,000; (ii) extends the useful life of the asset; and (iii) is not
related to making an apartment home ready for the next resident. Under this policy, a significant
portion of our capitalized costs is non-recurring, as recurring make-ready costs are expensed as
incurred. Because we expense recurring make-ready costs, such as (i) carpet and appliance
replacements; (ii) floor coverings; (iii) interior painting; and (iv) other redecorating costs, our
expense levels and volatility are greatest in the third quarter of each year as this is when we
experience our greatest amount of turnover. We generally expense replacements of personal
property.
For Established and Other Stabilized Communities, we recorded non-revenue generating capital
expenditures of $9 per apartment home and $38 per apartment home in the three months ended March
31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The average maintenance costs charged to expense per apartment
home, including carpet and appliance replacements, related to these communities was $354 and $332
in the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Historically, we have experienced
a gradual increase in capitalized costs and expensed maintenance costs per apartment home as the
average age of our communities has increased. We expect to return to the trend of gradual
increases in maintenance costs in future years.
Asset Impairment Evaluation
We assess the impairment of our investments and long-lived assets whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. For both our consolidated
and unconsolidated entities, factors that could trigger an assessment for impairment include, but
are not limited to: i) underperformance of the asset relative to historical or expected future
operating results, ii) significant change in legal and economic factors, iii) incurrence of costs
significantly in excess of amounts originally forecasted for construction or acquisition of an
asset, or iv) an expectation that a long-lived asset will be disposed of at an amount below the
current carrying value. We evaluate the key factors necessary in the assessment of asset
impairment on a quarterly basis. For the three months ended March 31, 2007, we did not recognize
any impairment in value associated with our investments or long-lived assets. We cannot predict
the occurrence of future events that may cause an impairment assessment to be performed.
REIT Status
We are a Maryland corporation that has elected to be treated, for federal income tax purposes, as a
REIT. We elected to be taxed as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the Code), as
amended, for the year ended December 31, 1994 and have not revoked such election. A corporate REIT
is a legal entity which holds real
estate interests and must meet a number of organizational and operational requirements, including a
requirement that it currently distribute at least 90% of its adjusted taxable income to
stockholders. As a REIT, we generally will not be subject to corporate level federal income tax on
taxable income if we distribute 100% of taxable income over time periods allowed under the Code to
our stockholders. If we fail to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, we will be subject to
federal income taxes at regular corporate rates (subject to any applicable alternative minimum tax)
and may not be able to elect to qualify as a REIT for four subsequent taxable years.
50
Part I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
There have been no material changes to our exposures to market risk since December 31, 2006.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
(a) | Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures. | ||
In connection with the filing of this report on Form 10-Q, we evaluated, with the participation of management including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures through the end of the period covered by this report on Form 10-Q. Based on such evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of the end of such period, our disclosure controls and procedures were functioning effectively to ensure that the information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commissions rules and forms. | |||
We continue to review and document our disclosure controls and procedures, including our internal controls and procedures for financial reporting, and may from time to time make changes aimed at enhancing their effectiveness and to ensure that our systems evolve with our business. |
(b) | Changes in internal controls over financial reporting. | ||
None. |
Part II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
None.
Item 1a. Risk Factors
In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully
consider the factors which could materially affect our business, financial
condition or future results discussed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2006 in Part I, Item 1a. Risk Factors. The risks
described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K are not the only risks that could
affect the Company. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us
or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our
business, financial condition and/or operating results in the future.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
During the three months ended March 31, 2007, the Company issued 1,673 shares of
common stock in exchange for 1,673 units of limited partnership held by limited
partners of Avalon DownREIT V, L.P. and Avalon Upper Falls Limited Partnership.
The shares were
51
issued in reliance on an exemption from registration under Section 4(2) of the
Securities Act of 1933. AvalonBay is relying on the exemption based on factual
representations received from the limited partners who received these shares.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
(d) | ||||||||||||||||
(c) | Maximum Dollar | |||||||||||||||
Total Number of | Amount that May Yet | |||||||||||||||
(a) | (b) | Shares Purchased as | be Purchased Under | |||||||||||||
Total Number of | Average Price Paid | Part of Publicly | the Plans or | |||||||||||||
Shares Purchased | per Share | Announced Plans or | Programs | |||||||||||||
Period | (1) | (2) | Programs | (in thousands) | ||||||||||||
Month Ended January 31, 2007 |
| $ | | | $ | 100,000 | ||||||||||
Month Ended February 28, 2007 |
6,405 | $ | 142.18 | | $ | 100,000 | ||||||||||
Month Ended March 31, 2007 |
32,287 | $ | 134.07 | | $ | 100,000 |
(1) | Includes shares surrendered to the Company in connection with employee stock option exercises or vesting of restricted stock as payment of exercise price or as payment of taxes. | |
(2) | As disclosed for the first time in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, our Board of Directors has adopted a Stock Repurchase Program under which we may acquire, from time to time, shares of common stock in the open market with an aggregate purchase price of up to $100,000,000. No purchases were made under this program in 2006 or in 2007 to date. In determining whether to repurchase shares, we consider a variety of factors, including our liquidity needs, the then current market price of our shares and the effect of the share repurchases on our per share earnings and FFO. There is no scheduled expiration date to this program. |
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
None.
Item 5. Other Information
None.
Item 6. Exhibits
52
Exhibit No. | Description | |||
3(i).1
|
| Articles of Amendment and Restatement of Articles of Incorporation of AvalonBay Communities (the Company), dated as of June 4, 1998. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(i).1 to Form 10-K of the Company filed on March 1, 2007.) | ||
3(i).2
|
| Articles of Amendment, dated as of October 2, 1998. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1(ii) to Form 10-K of the Company filed on March 1, 2007.) | ||
3(i).3
|
| Articles Supplementary, dated as of October 13, 1998, relating to the 8.70% Series H Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(i).3 to Form 10-K of the Company filed on March 1, 2007.) | ||
3(ii).1
|
| Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company, as adopted by the Board of Directors on February 13, 2003. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(ii) to Form 10-K of the Company filed March 11, 2003.) | ||
4.1
|
| Second Supplemental Indenture of Avalon Properties, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as Avalon Properties) dated as of December 16, 1997. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Form 10-K of the Company filed March 11, 2003.) | ||
4.2
|
| Indenture for Senior Debt Securities, dated as of January 16, 1998, between the Company and State Street Bank and Trust Company, as Trustee. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Registration Statement on form S-3 of the Company (File No. 333-139839), filed January 8, 2007.) | ||
4.3
|
| First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of January 20, 1998, between the Company and the State Street Bank and Trust Company as Trustee. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Registration Statement on Form S-3 of the Company (File No. 333-139839), filed January 8, 2007.) | ||
4.4
|
| Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of July 7, 1998, between the Company and State Street Bank and Trust Company as Trustee. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Registration Statement on Form S-3 of the Company (File No. 333-139839), filed January 8, 2007.) | ||
4.5
|
| Amended and Restated Third Supplemental Indenture, dated as of July 10, 2000 between the Company and State Street Bank and Trust Company as Trustee. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to Registration Statement on Form S-3 of the Company (File No. 333-139839), filed January 8, 2007.) | ||
4.6
|
| Fourth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of September 18, 2006 between the Company and U.S. Bank National Association as Trustee. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to Registration Statement on Form S-3 of the Company (File No. 333-139839), filed January 8, 2007.) | ||
4.7
|
| Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan of the Company. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 8.1 to Registration Statement on Form S-3 of the Company (File No. 333-87063), filed September 14, 1999.) | ||
4.8
|
| Amendment to the Companys Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan filed on December 17, 1999. (Incorporated by reference to the Prospectus Supplement filed pursuant to Rule 424(b)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 on December 17, 1999.) |
53
Exhibit No. | Description | |||
4.9
|
| Amendment to the Companys Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan filed on March 26, 2004. (Incorporated by reference to the Prospectus Supplement filed pursuant to Rule 424(b)(3) of the Securities Act of 1933 on March 26, 2004.) | ||
4.10
|
| Amendment to the Companys Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan filed on May 15, 2006. (Incorporated by references to the Prospectus Supplement filed pursuant to Rule 424(b)(3) of the Securities Act of 1933 on May 15, 2006.) | ||
12.1
|
| Statements re: Computation of Ratios. (Filed herewith.) | ||
31.1
|
| Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Chief Executive Officer.) (Filed herewith.) | ||
31.2
|
| Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Chief Financial Officer.) (Filed herewith.) | ||
32
|
| Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer.) (Furnished herewith.) |
54
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
AVALONBAY COMMUNITIES, INC.
Date: May 10, 2007 |
/s/ Bryce Blair | |||
Bryce Blair | ||||
Chief Executive Officer | ||||
(Principal Executive Officer) | ||||
Date:
May 10, 2007 |
/s/ Thomas J. Sargeant | |||
Thomas J. Sargeant | ||||
Chief Financial Officer | ||||
(Principal Financial Officer) |
55