EX-99.2
Published on August 2, 2007
Exhibit 99.2
AvalonBay Communities, Inc.
For Immediate News Release
July 31, 2007
July 31, 2007
AVALONBAY COMMUNITIES, INC. ANNOUNCES
SECOND QUARTER 2007 OPERATING RESULTS
SECOND QUARTER 2007 OPERATING RESULTS
(Alexandria, VA) AvalonBay Communities, Inc. (NYSE: AVB) reported today that Net Income
Available to Common Stockholders for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 was $48,877,000. This
resulted in Earnings per Share diluted (EPS) of $0.61 for the quarter ended June 30, 2007,
compared to $0.86 for the comparable period of 2006, a per share decrease of 29.1%. For the six
months ended June 30, 2007, EPS was $1.16 compared to $2.31 for the comparable period of 2006, a
per share decrease of 49.8%. These decreases are primarily attributable to the gains from the sale
of land and communities in 2006, partially offset by growth in income from existing and newly
developed communities in 2007. Results for 2006 have been restated to reflect the non-cash charges
associated with our change in the accounting for certain land leases.
Funds from Operations attributable to common stockholders diluted (FFO) for the quarter ended
June 30, 2007 was $94,041,000, or $1.17 per share, compared to $74,855,000, or $0.99 per share for
the comparable period of 2006. FFO per share increased 18.2%, due primarily to contributions from
improved community operating results and newly developed communities. Results for both periods
include the impact of a change in the accounting for non-cash charges for certain land leases.
FFO per share for the six months ended June 30, 2007 increased by 8.1% to $2.28 from $2.11 for the
comparable period of 2006. FFO per share for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and June 30, 2006,
as restated, includes $0.01 and $0.17 per share, respectively, related to the sale of land parcels.
Adjusting for these land sales in both years, FFO per share increased 17.0%, driven primarily by
improved community operating results and contributions from newly developed communities.
Operating Results for the Quarter Ended June 30, 2007 Compared to the Prior Year Period
For the Company, including discontinued operations, total revenue increased by $22,708,000, or
12.6% to $203,540,000. For Established Communities, rental revenue increased 6.3%, comprised of an
increase in Average Rental Rates of 6.6% and a decrease in Economic Occupancy of 0.3%. As a
result, total revenue for Established Communities increased $9,608,000 to $162,611,000. Operating
expenses for Established Communities increased $989,000, or 2.0% to $51,518,000. Accordingly, Net
Operating Income (NOI) for Established Communities increased by $8,619,000, or 8.4%, to
$111,093,000.
The following table reflects the percentage changes in rental revenue, operating expenses and NOI
for Established Communities from the second quarter of 2006 to the second quarter of 2007:
2Q 07 Compared to 2Q 06
Rental | Operating | % of | ||||||||||||||
Revenue | Expenses | NOI | NOI (1) | |||||||||||||
Northeast |
3.6 | % | 2.1 | % | 4.4 | % | 42.1 | % | ||||||||
Mid-Atlantic |
7.4 | % | 5.2 | % | 8.8 | % | 15.9 | % | ||||||||
Midwest |
6.5 | % | 5.0 | % | 7.4 | % | 2.1 | % | ||||||||
Pacific NW |
11.6 | % | (7.4 | %) | 21.7 | % | 4.7 | % | ||||||||
No. California |
9.4 | % | 0.4 | % | 13.3 | % | 22.8 | % | ||||||||
So. California |
5.9 | % | 2.5 | % | 7.4 | % | 12.4 | % | ||||||||
Total |
6.3 | % | 2.0 | % | 8.4 | % | 100.0 | % | ||||||||
(1) | Total represents each regions % of total NOI from the Company, including discontinued operations. |
Copyright © 2007 AvalonBay Communities, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Cash concessions are recognized in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
(GAAP) and are amortized over the approximate lease term, which is generally one year. The
following table reflects the percentage changes in rental revenue on a GAAP basis and Rental
Revenue with Concessions on a Cash Basis for our Established Communities:
2Q 07 vs 2Q 06 | ||||
Rental Revenue Change with
Concessions on a GAAP Basis |
6.3 | % | ||
Rental Revenue Change with
Concessions on a Cash Basis |
4.6 | % |
Operating Results for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2007 Compared to the Prior Year Period
For the Company, including discontinued operations, total revenue increased by $42,626,000, or
11.9% to $400,246,000. For Established Communities, rental revenue increased 6.4%, comprised of an
increase in Average Rental Rates of 6.8% and a decrease in Economic Occupancy of 0.4%. As a
result, total revenue for Established Communities increased $19,491,000 to $322,276,000, and
operating expenses for Established Communities increased $2,322,000 or 2.3% to $102,540,000.
Accordingly, NOI for Established Communities increased by $17,169,000 or 8.5% to $219,736,000.
The following table reflects the percentage changes in rental revenue, operating expenses and NOI
for Established Communities for the six months ended June 30, 2007 as compared to the six months
ended June 30, 2006:
YTD 2007 Compared to YTD 2006
Rental | Operating | % of | ||||||||||||||
Revenue | Expenses | NOI | NOI (1) | |||||||||||||
Northeast |
3.8 | % | 1.2 | % | 5.1 | % | 42.5 | % | ||||||||
Mid-Atlantic |
7.7 | % | 7.2 | % | 8.1 | % | 16.3 | % | ||||||||
Midwest |
7.9 | % | 9.8 | % | 6.8 | % | 2.1 | % | ||||||||
Pacific NW |
12.1 | % | (1.6 | %) | 19.4 | % | 4.4 | % | ||||||||
No. California |
9.2 | % | 0.5 | % | 13.0 | % | 21.9 | % | ||||||||
So. California |
6.0 | % | 1.8 | % | 7.7 | % | 12.8 | % | ||||||||
Total |
6.4 | % | 2.3 | % | 8.5 | % | 100.0 | % | ||||||||
(1) | Total represents each regions % of total NOI from the Company, including discontinued operations. |
Development and Redevelopment Activity
The Company completed the development of one community during the second quarter of 2007. Avalon
Shrewsbury, located in Shrewsbury, MA, is a garden-style community containing 251 apartment homes
and was completed for a Total Capital Cost of $35,900,000.
In addition, the Company commenced construction on four communities during the second quarter of
2007: Avalon White Plains, a high-rise community located in Westchester County, NY; Avalon at
Tinton Falls, a garden-style community located in Central NJ; Avalon Fashion Valley, a mid-rise
community located in San Diego, CA and Avalon Anaheim, a mid-rise community located in Orange
County, CA. These four communities are expected to contain an aggregate of 1,021 apartment homes
when completed for an estimated Total Capital Cost of $363,100,000.
During the second quarter of 2007, the Company purchased a land parcel located in San Francisco,
CA, adjacent to its existing Mission Bay North and Mission Bay North II communities for
approximately $36,000,000. The Company expects to begin construction of a 260 apartment home,
high-rise community as the third phase of this community in the fourth quarter of 2007.
Acquisition Activity
In July 2007, the Company purchased a garden-style community located in San Jose, CA adjacent to
its existing Countrybrook community. This community, renamed Countrybrook II, contains 80
apartment homes and was acquired for a purchase price of $17,700,000. The Company will operate
this community in conjunction with Countrybrook.
Disposition Activity
In July 2007, the Company sold Avalon View, located in Fishkill, NY. This community contains 288
apartment homes and was sold for a price of $54,000,000. This resulted in a GAAP gain of
approximately $40,200,000 and an Economic Gain of approximately $33,200,000. The Unleveraged IRR
over an approximate 14-year holding period was 18.3%.
Also in July 2007, the Company entered into an agreement to sell San Marino for a price of
$55,000,000. We expect the sale of San Marino, a 248 apartment-home community located in San Jose,
CA, to close in the third quarter of 2007.
The buyers of these assets intend to continue to operate these communities as rental apartments.
Copyright © 2007 AvalonBay Communities, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Investment Management Fund Activity
AvalonBay Value Added Fund, L.P. (the Fund) is a private, discretionary investment vehicle in
which the Company holds an equity interest of approximately 15%. During the second quarter of
2007, the Fund acquired Skyway Terrace, located in San Jose, CA, for a purchase price of
$74,000,000. Skyway Terrace is a garden-style community containing 348 apartment homes.
In addition, during the second quarter of 2007, the Fund commenced the redevelopment of Paseo Park,
located in Fremont, CA. Paseo Park contains 134 apartment homes and will be redeveloped for an
expected Total Capital Cost of $5,700,000, excluding costs incurred prior to the start of
redevelopment.
In July 2007, the Fund acquired two communities, Avalon Rutherford Station and South Hills
Apartments. Avalon Rutherford Station is a garden-style community containing 108 apartment homes
and is located in East Rutherford, NJ. This community was acquired for a purchase price of
$35,850,000. South Hills Apartments is a garden-style community containing 85 apartment homes in
Los Angeles, CA. This community was acquired for a purchase price of $20,700,000.
Including the acquisition of Avalon Rutherford Station and South Hills Apartments, the Fund has
invested $743,985,000 as of July 31, 2007.
Financing, Liquidity and Balance Sheet Statistics
As of June 30, 2007, the Company had no amounts outstanding under its $650,000,000 unsecured credit
facility and $137,800,000 in unrestricted cash available. Leverage, calculated as total debt as a
percentage of Total Market Capitalization, was 23.3% at June 30, 2007. Unencumbered NOI for the
six months ended June 30, 2007 was 83.4% and Interest Coverage for the second quarter of 2007 was
4.7 times.
Revised Accounting Interpretation
As discussed in Amendment No. 1 to the Companys 2006 Annual Report on Form 10-K/A, the Company
made a change related to its accounting for land leases. This change resulted in a non-cash charge
to operating expenses and reduced reported FFO by $0.03 and $0.07 per share from what would have
been reported for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 under the Companys prior accounting
treatment. Results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 have also been restated,
reducing reported FFO by $0.04 and $0.07 per share from what had previously been reported to
reflect the impact of this change in land lease accounting.
Third Quarter and Full Year 2007 Financial Outlook
The Company expects EPS in the range of $1.99 to $2.03 for the third quarter of 2007. Based on
changes in the Companys disposition plan, the Company is revising its projected EPS to a range of
$3.83 to $3.93 for the full year 2007.
The Company expects Projected FFO per share in the range of $1.17 to $1.21 for the third quarter of
2007. The Company expects Projected FFO per share in the range of $4.60 to $4.70 for the full year
2007. The financial outlook provided for the third quarter and full year 2007 includes non-cash
charges of $0.03 and $0.13 per share, respectively, related to the revised lease accounting
discussed in Amendment No. 1 to the Companys 2006 Annual Report on Form 10-K/A.
The Company expects to release its third quarter 2007 earnings on October 31, 2007 after the market
closes. The Company expects to hold a conference call on November 1, 2007 at 11:00 AM EDT to
discuss the third quarter 2007 results.
Other Matters
The Company will hold a conference call on August 2, 2007 at 11:00 AM EDT to review and answer
questions about this release, its second quarter results, the Attachments (described below) and
related matters. To participate on the call, dial 1-877-510-2397 domestically and 1-706-634-5877
internationally.
To hear a replay of the call, which will be available from August 2, 2007 at 2:00 PM EDT until
August 9, 2007 at 11:59 PM EDT, dial 1-800-642-1687 domestically and 1-706-645-9291
internationally, and use Access Code: 4123380.
A webcast of the conference call will also be available at http://www.avalonbay.com/earnings, and
an on-line playback of the webcast will be available for at least 30 days following the call.
The Company produces Earnings Release Attachments (the Attachments) that provide detailed
information regarding operating, development, redevelopment, disposition and acquisition activity.
These Attachments are considered a part of this earnings release and are available in full with
this earnings release via the Companys website at http://www.avalonbay.com/earnings and through
e-mail distribution. To receive future press releases via e-mail, please send a request to
IR@avalonbay.com.
Copyright © 2007 AvalonBay Communities, Inc. All Rights Reserved
About AvalonBay Communities, Inc.
As of June 30, 2007, the Company owned or held a direct or indirect ownership interest in 176
apartment communities containing 50,771 apartment homes in ten states and the District of Columbia,
of which 19 communities were under construction and 7 communities were under reconstruction. The
Company is an equity REIT in the business of developing, redeveloping, acquiring and managing
apartment communities in high barrier-to-entry markets of the United States. More information may
be found on the Companys website at the following address http://www.avalonbay.com. For
additional information, please contact John Christie, Senior Director of Investor Relations and
Research at 1-703-317-4747 or Thomas J. Sargeant, Chief Financial Officer, at 1-703-317-4635.
Forward-Looking Statements
This release, including its Attachments, contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of
Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended. You can identify these forward-looking statements by the Companys use of
words such as expects, plans, estimates, projects, intends, believes, outlook and
similar expressions that do not relate to historical matters. Actual results may differ materially
from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements as a result of risks and
uncertainties, which include the following: changes in local employment conditions, demand for
apartment homes, supply of competitive housing products, and other economic conditions may result
in lower than expected occupancy and/or rental rates and adversely affect the profitability of our
communities; increases in costs of materials, labor or other expenses may result in communities
that we develop or redevelop failing to achieve expected profitability; delays in completing
development, redevelopment and/or lease-up may result in increased financing and construction costs
and may delay and/or reduce the profitability of a community; debt and/or equity financing for
development, redevelopment or acquisitions of communities may not be available on favorable terms;
we may be unable to obtain, or experience delays in obtaining, necessary governmental permits and
authorizations; or we may abandon development or redevelopment opportunities for which we have
already incurred costs.
Additional discussions of risks and uncertainties appear in the Companys filings with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, including the Companys Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A to our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 under the headings Risk
Factors and under the heading Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations Forward-Looking Statements.
The Company does not undertake a duty to update forward-looking statements, including its expected
operating results for the third quarter and full year 2007. The Company may, in its discretion,
provide information in future public announcements regarding its outlook that may be of interest to
the investment community. The format and extent of future outlooks may be different from the
format and extent of the information contained in this release.
Definitions and Reconciliations
Non-GAAP financial measures and other capitalized terms, as used in this earnings release, are
defined and further explained on Attachment 14, Definitions and Reconciliations of Non-GAAP
Financial Measures and Other Terms. Attachment 14 is included in the full earnings release
available at the Companys website at http://www.avalonbay.com/earnings.
Copyright © 2007 AvalonBay Communities, Inc. All Rights Reserved
SECOND QUARTER 2007
Supplemental Operating and Financial Data
Avalon Riverview North is located on the East River waterfront in the Queens West area of New
York City. Currently under construction, Avalon Riverview North is expected to be completed in the
third quarter of 2008 for an estimated Total Capital Cost of $175.6 million. Upon completion, the
community will contain 602 apartment homes. It is the second of a two phase community containing an
aggregate of 974 apartment homes.
Apartment homes at Avalon Riverview North feature hardwood floors, walk-in closets and gourmet
kitchens with black granite countertops, maple cabinetry and stainless steel appliances. The
community is located just steps from a subway station providing one-stop access to Grand Central
Station on the 7 train. Community amenities include 24-hour concierge service, a cold storage
facility in the lobby for grocery deliveries, resident lounge, fitness center, and an outdoor
swimming pool with Manhattan city views.
SECOND QUARTER 2007
Supplemental Operating and Financial Data
Table of Contents
Company Profile |
||
Selected Operating and Other Information
|
Attachment 1 | |
Detailed Operating Information
|
Attachment 2 | |
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
Attachment 3 | |
Sub-Market Profile |
||
Quarterly Revenue and Occupancy Changes (Established Communities)
|
Attachment 4 | |
Sequential Quarterly Revenue and Occupancy Changes (Established Communities)
|
Attachment 5 | |
Year-to-Date Revenue and Occupancy Changes (Established Communities)
|
Attachment 6 | |
Development, Redevelopment, Acquisition and Disposition Profile |
||
Summary of Development and Redevelopment Activity
|
Attachment 7 | |
Development Communities
|
Attachment 8 | |
Redevelopment Communities
|
Attachment 9 | |
Summary of Development and Redevelopment Community Activity
|
Attachment 10 | |
Future Development
|
Attachment 11 | |
Unconsolidated Real Estate Investments
|
Attachment 12 | |
Summary of Disposition Activity
|
Attachment 13 | |
Definitions and Reconciliations |
||
Definitions and Reconciliations of Non-GAAP Financial Measures and Other Terms
|
Attachment 14 |
The following is a Safe Harbor Statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and Section 21E of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The projections and estimates contained in the following attachments are forward-looking statements that
involve risks and uncertainties, and actual results may differ materially from those projected in such statements. Risks associated with
the Companys development, redevelopment, construction, and lease-up activities, which could impact the forward-looking statements made are
discussed in the paragraph titled Forward-Looking Statements in the release to which these attachments relate. In particular,
development opportunities may be abandoned; Total Capital Cost of a community may exceed original estimates, possibly making the community
uneconomical and/or affecting projected returns; construction and lease-up may not be completed on schedule, resulting in increased debt
service and construction costs; and other risks described in the Companys filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including
Amendent No. 1 to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 and the Companys Quarterly
Reports on Form 10-Q for subsequent quarters.
Attachment 1
AvalonBay Communities, Inc.
Selected Operating and Other Information
June 30, 2007
(Dollars in thousands except per share data)
(unaudited)
Selected Operating and Other Information
June 30, 2007
(Dollars in thousands except per share data)
(unaudited)
SELECTED OPERATING INFORMATION
Q2 | Q2 | YTD | YTD | |||||||||||||||||||||
2007 | 2006 (1) | % Change | 2007 | 2006 (1) | % Change | |||||||||||||||||||
Net income available to common
stockholders |
$ | 48,877 | $ | 64,831 | (24.6 | %) | $ | 93,221 | $ | 173,770 | (46.4 | %) | ||||||||||||
Per common share basic |
$ | 0.62 | $ | 0.87 | (28.7 | %) | $ | 1.18 | $ | 2.35 | (49.8 | %) | ||||||||||||
Per common share diluted |
$ | 0.61 | $ | 0.86 | (29.1 | %) | $ | 1.16 | $ | 2.31 | (49.8 | %) | ||||||||||||
Funds from Operations |
$ | 94,041 | $ | 74,855 | 25.6 | % | $ | 183,158 | $ | 159,044 | 15.2 | % | ||||||||||||
Per common share diluted |
$ | 1.17 | $ | 0.99 | 18.2 | % | $ | 2.28 | $ | 2.11 | 8.1 | % | ||||||||||||
Dividends declared common |
$ | 67,774 | $ | 58,044 | 16.8 | % | $ | 135,468 | $ | 116,030 | 16.8 | % | ||||||||||||
Per common share |
$ | 0.85 | $ | 0.78 | 9.0 | % | $ | 1.70 | $ | 1.56 | 9.0 | % | ||||||||||||
Common shares outstanding |
79,734,293 | 74,415,977 | 7.1 | % | 79,734,293 | 74,415,977 | 7.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Outstanding operating partnership
units |
125,724 | 152,002 | (17.3 | %) | 125,724 | 152,002 | (17.3 | %) | ||||||||||||||||
Total outstanding shares and units |
79,860,017 | 74,567,979 | 7.1 | % | 79,860,017 | 74,567,979 | 7.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Average shares outstanding basic |
79,428,056 | 74,100,800 | 7.2 | % | 78,932,715 | 73,950,147 | 6.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Average operating partnership units
outstanding |
126,392 | 152,221 | (17.0 | %) | 135,439 | 194,662 | (30.4 | %) | ||||||||||||||||
Effect of dilutive securities |
1,093,066 | 1,108,890 | (1.4 | %) | 1,214,989 | 1,141,137 | 6.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Average shares outstanding diluted |
80,647,514 | 75,361,911 | 7.0 | % | 80,283,143 | 75,285,946 | 6.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||
DEBT COMPOSITION AND MATURITIES
% of Total | Average | |||||||||||||||||||
Market | Interest | Remaining | ||||||||||||||||||
Debt Composition (2) | Amount | Cap | Rate (3) | Maturities (2) | ||||||||||||||||
Conventional Debt |
2007 | $ | 264,846 | |||||||||||||||||
Long-term, fixed rate |
$ | 2,199,134 | 17.6 | % | 2008 | $ | 208,908 | |||||||||||||
Long-term, variable rate |
125,786 | 1.0 | % | 2009 | $ | 231,428 | ||||||||||||||
Subtotal, Conventional |
2,324,920 | 18.6 | % | 6.4 | % | 2010 | $ | 235,268 | ||||||||||||
2011 | $ | 405,337 | ||||||||||||||||||
Tax-Exempt Debt |
||||||||||||||||||||
Long-term, fixed rate |
164,775 | 1.3 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Long-term, variable rate |
427,692 | 3.4 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Subtotal, Tax-Exempt |
592,467 | 4.7 | % | 5.1 | % | |||||||||||||||
Total Debt |
$ | 2,917,387 | 23.3 | % | 6.1 | % | ||||||||||||||
(1) 2006 amounts have been restated from amounts previously reported to
reflect a change in accounting for land leases.
(2) Excludes debt associated with communities classified as held for sale.
(3) Includes credit enhancement fees, trustees fees, etc.
CAPITALIZED COSTS
Non-Rev | ||||||||||||
Cap | Cap | Capex | ||||||||||
Interest | Overhead | per Home | ||||||||||
Q207 |
$ | 18,393 | $ | 6,684 | $ | 38 | ||||||
Q107 |
$ | 15,433 | $ | 6,606 | $ | 9 | ||||||
Q406 |
$ | 13,909 | $ | 6,847 | $ | 92 | ||||||
Q306 |
$ | 12,910 | $ | 6,361 | $ | 203 | ||||||
Q206 |
$ | 11,205 | $ | 5,377 | $ | 164 |
COMMUNITY INFORMATION
Apartment | ||||||||
Communities | Homes | |||||||
Current Communities |
157 | 44,952 | ||||||
Development Communities |
19 | 5,819 | ||||||
Development Rights |
53 | 14,108 |
Attachment 2
AvalonBay Communities, Inc.
Detailed Operating Information
June 30, 2007
(Dollars in thousands except per share data)
(unaudited)
Detailed Operating Information
June 30, 2007
(Dollars in thousands except per share data)
(unaudited)
Q2 | Q2 | YTD | YTD | |||||||||||||||||||||
2007 | 2006 (1) | % Change | 2007 | 2006 (1) | % Change | |||||||||||||||||||
Revenue: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rental and other income |
$ | 200,448 | $ | 177,688 | 12.8 | % | $ | 394,169 | $ | 350,111 | 12.6 | % | ||||||||||||
Management, development and other fees |
1,488 | 1,395 | 6.7 | % | 2,932 | 2,601 | 12.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total |
201,936 | 179,083 | 12.8 | % | 397,101 | 352,712 | 12.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Direct property operating expenses,
excluding property taxes |
47,291 | 43,093 | 9.7 | % | 94,050 | 84,204 | 11.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Property taxes |
18,791 | 16,642 | 12.9 | % | 36,289 | 33,318 | 8.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Property management and other indirect
operating expenses |
8,706 | 8,307 | 4.8 | % | 17,146 | 16,938 | 1.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Investments and investment management (2) |
2,483 | 2,398 | 3.5 | % | 4,508 | 3,869 | 16.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total |
77,271 | 70,440 | 9.7 | % | 151,993 | 138,329 | 9.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Interest expense, net |
(22,662 | ) | (26,115 | ) | (13.2 | %) | (46,159 | ) | (54,311 | ) | (15.0 | %) | ||||||||||||
General and administrative expense |
(6,642 | ) | (6,479 | ) | 2.5 | % | (13,422 | ) | (12,762 | ) | 5.2 | % | ||||||||||||
Joint venture income and minority interest expense |
(653 | ) | 79 | (926.6 | %) | (1,189 | ) | 174 | (783.3 | %) | ||||||||||||||
Depreciation expense |
(44,195 | ) | (41,285 | ) | 7.0 | % | (88,023 | ) | (81,251 | ) | 8.3 | % | ||||||||||||
Gain on sale of land |
| | N/A | 545 | 13,166 | (95.9 | %) | |||||||||||||||||
Income from continuing operations |
50,513 | 34,843 | 45.0 | % | 96,860 | 79,399 | 22.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Discontinued operations: (3)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Income from discontinued operations |
539 | 171 | 215.2 | % | 711 | 1,310 | (45.7 | %) | ||||||||||||||||
Gain on sale of communities |
| 31,992 | (100.0 | %) | | 97,411 | (100.0 | %) | ||||||||||||||||
Total discontinued operations |
539 | 32,163 | (98.3 | %) | 711 | 98,721 | (99.3 | %) | ||||||||||||||||
Net income |
51,052 | 67,006 | (23.8 | %) | 97,571 | 178,120 | (45.2 | %) | ||||||||||||||||
Dividends attributable to preferred stock |
(2,175 | ) | (2,175 | ) | | (4,350 | ) | (4,350 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Net income available to common stockholders |
$ | 48,877 | $ | 64,831 | (24.6 | %) | $ | 93,221 | $ | 173,770 | (46.4 | %) | ||||||||||||
Net income per common share basic |
$ | 0.62 | $ | 0.87 | (28.7 | %) | $ | 1.18 | $ | 2.35 | (49.8 | %) | ||||||||||||
Net income per common share diluted |
$ | 0.61 | $ | 0.86 | (29.1 | %) | $ | 1.16 | $ | 2.31 | (49.8 | %) | ||||||||||||
(1) | Amounts for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 have been restated from amounts previously reported to reflect a change in accounting for land leases. | |
(2) | Reflects costs incurred related to investment acquisition, investment management and abandoned pursuits. | |
(3) | Reflects net income for communities classified as discontinued operations as of June 30, 2007 and communities sold during the period from January 1, 2006 through June 30, 2007. The following table details income from discontinued operations for the periods shown: |
Q2 | Q2 | YTD | YTD | |||||||||||||
2007 | 2006 | 2007 | 2006 | |||||||||||||
Rental income |
$ | 1,604 | $ | 1,749 | $ | 3,145 | $ | 4,908 | ||||||||
Operating and other expenses |
(730 | ) | (837 | ) | (1,452 | ) | (2,131 | ) | ||||||||
Interest expense, net |
(158 | ) | (480 | ) | (539 | ) | (947 | ) | ||||||||
Depreciation expense |
(177 | ) | (261 | ) | (443 | ) | (520 | ) | ||||||||
Income from discontinued operations (4) |
$ | 539 | $ | 171 | $ | 711 | $ | 1,310 | ||||||||
(4) | NOI for discontinued operations totaled $874 and $1,693 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007, respectively. All of these amounts relate to assets held for sale. |
Attachment 3
AvalonBay Communities, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Dollars in thousands)
(unaudited)
(unaudited)
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2007 | 2006 | |||||||
Real estate |
$ | 5,924,062 | $ | 5,675,823 | ||||
Less accumulated depreciation |
(1,181,799 | ) | (1,093,933 | ) | ||||
Net operating real estate |
4,742,263 | 4,581,890 | ||||||
Construction in progress, including land |
810,925 | 641,781 | ||||||
Land held for development |
352,616 | 202,314 | ||||||
Operating real estate assets held for sale, net |
84,338 | 84,377 | ||||||
Total real estate, net |
5,990,142 | 5,510,362 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
137,770 | 8,343 | ||||||
Cash in escrow |
220,418 | 135,917 | ||||||
Resident security deposits |
30,635 | 26,429 | ||||||
Other assets (1) |
163,845 | 164,440 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 6,542,810 | $ | 5,845,491 | ||||
Unsecured senior notes, net |
$ | 2,153,289 | $ | 2,153,078 | ||||
Unsecured facility |
| | ||||||
Notes payable |
761,387 | 648,350 | ||||||
Resident security deposits |
41,565 | 38,376 | ||||||
Liabilities related to assets held for sale |
51,607 | 67,772 | ||||||
Other liabilities |
360,287 | 346,450 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
$ | 3,368,135 | $ | 3,254,026 | ||||
Minority interest |
24,883 | 18,311 | ||||||
Stockholders equity |
3,149,792 | 2,573,154 | ||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
$ | 6,542,810 | $ | 5,845,491 | ||||
(1) | Other assets includes $2,508 and $3,558 relating to assets classified as held for sale as of June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively. |
Attachment 4
AvalonBay Communities, Inc.
Quarterly Revenue and Occupancy Changes Established Communities (1)
Quarterly Revenue and Occupancy Changes Established Communities (1)
June 30, 2007
Apartment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Homes | Average Rental Rates (2) | Economic Occupancy | Rental Revenue ($000s) (3) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Q2 07 | Q2 06 | % Change | Q2 07 | Q2 06 | % Change | Q2 07 | Q2 06 | % Change | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Northeast |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Boston, MA |
3,621 | $ | 1,876 | $ | 1,863 | 0.7% | 96.1% | 96.0% | 0.1% | $ | 19,597 | $ | 19,449 | 0.8% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fairfield-New Haven, CT |
2,412 | 2,019 | 1,897 | 6.4% | 96.9% | 97.1% | (0.2% | ) | 14,156 | 13,331 | 6.2% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
New York, NY |
1,730 | 2,487 | 2,358 | 5.5% | 97.4% | 96.9% | 0.5% | 12,575 | 11,861 | 6.0% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Long Island, NY |
1,469 | 2,327 | 2,246 | 3.6% | 95.6% | 97.0% | (1.4% | ) | 9,808 | 9,597 | 2.2% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Northern New Jersey |
1,182 | 2,641 | 2,461 | 7.3% | 95.9% | 97.3% | (1.4% | ) | 8,985 | 8,484 | 5.9% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Central New Jersey |
814 | 1,703 | 1,697 | 0.4% | 96.6% | 96.6% | 0.0% | 4,018 | 4,003 | 0.4% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Northeast Average |
11,228 | 2,127 | 2,049 | 3.8% | 96.5% | 96.7% | (0.2% | ) | 69,139 | 66,725 | 3.6% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mid-Atlantic |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Washington, DC |
5,215 | 1,779 | 1,636 | 8.7% | 95.1% | 96.3% | (1.2% | ) | 26,473 | 24,620 | 7.5% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baltimore, MD |
542 | 1,271 | 1,188 | 7.0% | 96.6% | 98.1% | (1.5% | ) | 1,996 | 1,892 | 5.5% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mid-Atlantic Average |
5,757 | 1,731 | 1,592 | 8.7% | 95.2% | 96.5% | (1.3% | ) | 28,469 | 26,512 | 7.4% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Midwest |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Chicago, IL |
887 | 1,198 | 1,124 | 6.6% | 94.6% | 94.7% | (0.1% | ) | 3,016 | 2,831 | 6.5% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Midwest Average |
887 | 1,198 | 1,124 | 6.6% | 94.6% | 94.7% | (0.1% | ) | 3,016 | 2,831 | 6.5% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pacific Northwest |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Seattle, WA |
2,278 | 1,262 | 1,126 | 12.1% | 95.8% | 96.3% | (0.5% | ) | 8,264 | 7,408 | 11.6% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pacific Northwest Average |
2,278 | 1,262 | 1,126 | 12.1% | 95.8% | 96.3% | (0.5% | ) | 8,264 | 7,408 | 11.6% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Northern California |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
San Jose, CA |
4,292 | 1,691 | 1,535 | 10.2% | 97.1% | 96.5% | 0.6% | 21,151 | 19,091 | 10.8% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Oakland-East Bay, CA |
1,955 | 1,382 | 1,277 | 8.2% | 96.8% | 96.2% | 0.6% | 7,850 | 7,212 | 8.8% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
San Francisco, CA |
1,862 | 1,975 | 1,834 | 7.7% | 95.9% | 96.5% | (0.6% | ) | 10,586 | 9,883 | 7.1% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Northern California Average |
8,109 | 1,682 | 1,543 | 9.0% | 96.8% | 96.4% | 0.4% | 39,587 | 36,186 | 9.4% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Southern California |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Los Angeles, CA |
1,198 | 1,658 | 1,570 | 5.6% | 95.8% | 95.5% | 0.3% | 5,710 | 5,393 | 5.9% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
San Diego, CA |
1,058 | 1,460 | 1,385 | 5.4% | 95.5% | 95.4% | 0.1% | 4,427 | 4,195 | 5.5% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Orange County, CA |
916 | 1,457 | 1,360 | 7.1% | 95.8% | 96.4% | (0.6% | ) | 3,836 | 3,603 | 6.5% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Southern California Average |
3,172 | 1,534 | 1,448 | 5.9% | 95.7% | 95.7% | 0.0% | 13,973 | 13,191 | 5.9% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average/Total Established |
31,431 | $ | 1,790 | $ | 1,679 | 6.6% | 96.2% | 96.5% | (0.3% | ) | $ | 162,448 | $ | 152,853 | 6.3% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
(1) | Established Communities are communities with stabilized occupancy and operating expenses as of January 1, 2006 such that a comparison of 2006 to 2007 is meaningful. | |
(2) | Reflects the effect of concessions amortized over the average lease term. | |
(3) | With concessions presented on a cash basis, rental revenue from Established Communities increased 4.6% between years. |
Attachment 5
AvalonBay Communities, Inc.
*Sequential Quarterly* Revenue and Occupancy Changes Established Communities (1)
*Sequential Quarterly* Revenue and Occupancy Changes Established Communities (1)
June 30, 2007
Apartment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Homes | Average Rental Rates (2) | Economic Occupancy | Rental Revenue ($000's) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Q2 07 | Q1 07 | % Change | Q2 07 | Q1 07 | % Change | Q2 07 | Q1 07 | % Change | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Northeast |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Boston, MA |
3,621 | $ | 1,876 | $ | 1,874 | 0.1% | 96.1% | 95.5% | 0.6% | $ | 19,597 | $ | 19,445 | 0.8% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fairfield-New Haven, CT |
2,412 | 2,019 | 1,985 | 1.7% | 96.9% | 95.1% | 1.8% | 14,156 | 13,664 | 3.6% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
New York, NY |
1,730 | 2,487 | 2,449 | 1.6% | 97.4% | 95.6% | 1.8% | 12,575 | 12,150 | 3.5% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Long Island, NY |
1,469 | 2,327 | 2,296 | 1.4% | 95.6% | 96.8% | (1.2% | ) | 9,808 | 9,790 | 0.2% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Northern New Jersey |
1,182 | 2,641 | 2,578 | 2.4% | 95.9% | 96.9% | (1.0% | ) | 8,985 | 8,860 | 1.4% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Central New Jersey |
814 | 1,703 | 1,652 | 3.1% | 96.6% | 96.7% | (0.1% | ) | 4,018 | 3,901 | 3.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Northeast Average |
11,228 | 2,127 | 2,100 | 1.3% | 96.5% | 95.9% | 0.6% | 69,139 | 67,810 | 2.0% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mid-Atlantic |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Washington, DC |
5,215 | 1,779 | 1,734 | 2.6% | 95.1% | 95.9% | (0.8% | ) | 26,473 | 26,028 | 1.7% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baltimore, MD |
542 | 1,271 | 1,256 | 1.2% | 96.6% | 94.8% | 1.8% | 1,996 | 1,936 | 3.1% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mid-Atlantic Average |
5,757 | 1,731 | 1,689 | 2.5% | 95.2% | 95.9% | (0.7% | ) | 28,469 | 27,964 | 1.8% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Midwest |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Chicago, IL |
887 | 1,198 | 1,181 | 1.4% | 94.6% | 95.4% | (0.8% | ) | 3,016 | 2,994 | 0.7% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Midwest Average |
887 | 1,198 | 1,181 | 1.4% | 94.6% | 95.4% | (0.8% | ) | 3,016 | 2,994 | 0.7% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pacific Northwest |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Seattle, WA |
2,278 | 1,262 | 1,232 | 2.4% | 95.8% | 96.0% | (0.2% | ) | 8,264 | 8,083 | 2.2% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pacific Northwest Average |
2,278 | 1,262 | 1,232 | 2.4% | 95.8% | 96.0% | (0.2% | ) | 8,264 | 8,083 | 2.2% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Northern California |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
San Jose, CA |
4,292 | 1,691 | 1,653 | 2.3% | 97.1% | 97.5% | (0.4% | ) | 21,151 | 20,744 | 2.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Oakland-East Bay, CA |
1,955 | 1,382 | 1,359 | 1.7% | 96.8% | 96.5% | 0.3% | 7,850 | 7,691 | 2.1% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
San Francisco, CA |
1,862 | 1,975 | 1,944 | 1.6% | 95.9% | 95.9% | 0.0% | 10,586 | 10,421 | 1.6% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Northern California Average |
8,109 | 1,682 | 1,649 | 2.0% | 96.8% | 96.9% | (0.1% | ) | 39,587 | 38,856 | 1.9% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Southern California |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Los Angeles, CA |
1,198 | 1,658 | 1,640 | 1.1% | 95.8% | 95.2% | 0.6% | 5,710 | 5,612 | 1.7% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
San Diego, CA |
1,058 | 1,460 | 1,440 | 1.4% | 95.5% | 95.6% | (0.1% | ) | 4,427 | 4,367 | 1.4% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Orange County, CA |
916 | 1,457 | 1,434 | 1.6% | 95.8% | 96.9% | (1.1% | ) | 3,836 | 3,821 | 0.4% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Southern California Average |
3,172 | 1,534 | 1,514 | 1.3% | 95.7% | 95.8% | (0.1% | ) | 13,973 | 13,800 | 1.3% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average/Total Established |
31,431 | $ | 1,790 | $ | 1,760 | 1.7% | 96.2% | 96.1% | 0.1% | $ | 162,448 | $ | 159,507 | 1.8% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(1) | Established Communities are communities with stabilized occupancy and operating expenses as of January 1, 2006 such that a comparison of first and second quarter of 2007 is meaningful. | |
(2) | Reflects the effect of concessions amortized over the average lease term. |
Attachment 6
AvalonBay Communities, Inc.
Year-To-Date Revenue and Occupancy Changes Established Communities (1)
Year-To-Date Revenue and Occupancy Changes Established Communities (1)
June 30, 2007
Apartment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Homes | Average Rental Rates (2) | Economic Occupancy | Rental Revenue ($000's) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
YTD Q2 07 | YTD Q2 06 | % Change | YTD Q2 07 | YTD Q2 06 | % Change | YTD Q2 07 | YTD Q2 06 | % Change | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Northeast |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Boston, MA |
3,621 | $ | 1,875 | $ | 1,860 | 0.8% | 95.8% | 96.0% | (0.2% | ) | $ | 39,041 | $ | 38,797 | 0.6% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fairfield-New Haven, CT |
2,412 | 2,002 | 1,874 | 6.8% | 96.0% | 96.8% | (0.8% | ) | 27,820 | 26,238 | 6.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
New York, NY |
1,730 | 2,468 | 2,340 | 5.5% | 96.5% | 97.0% | (0.5% | ) | 24,725 | 23,554 | 5.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Long Island, NY |
1,469 | 2,311 | 2,217 | 4.2% | 96.2% | 96.2% | 0.0% | 19,599 | 18,810 | 4.2% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Northern New Jersey |
1,182 | 2,610 | 2,434 | 7.2% | 96.4% | 96.9% | (0.5% | ) | 17,845 | 16,720 | 6.7% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Central New Jersey |
814 | 1,678 | 1,665 | 0.8% | 96.6% | 96.1% | 0.5% | 7,919 | 7,814 | 1.3% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Northeast Average |
11,228 | 2,113 | 2,030 | 4.1% | 96.2% | 96.5% | (0.3% | ) | 136,949 | 131,933 | 3.8% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mid-Atlantic |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Washington, DC |
5,215 | 1,756 | 1,612 | 8.9% | 95.5% | 96.5% | (1.0% | ) | 52,501 | 48,650 | 7.9% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baltimore, MD |
542 | 1,263 | 1,174 | 7.6% | 95.7% | 98.1% | (2.4% | ) | 3,932 | 3,737 | 5.2% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mid-Atlantic Average |
5,757 | 1,709 | 1,572 | 8.7% | 95.6% | 96.6% | (1.0% | ) | 56,433 | 52,387 | 7.7% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Midwest |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Chicago, IL |
887 | 1,189 | 1,109 | 7.2% | 95.0% | 94.3% | 0.7% | 6,009 | 5,567 | 7.9% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Midwest Average |
887 | 1,189 | 1,109 | 7.2% | 95.0% | 94.3% | 0.7% | 6,009 | 5,567 | 7.9% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pacific Northwest |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Seattle, WA |
2,278 | 1,247 | 1,109 | 12.4% | 95.9% | 96.2% | (0.3% | ) | 16,347 | 14,582 | 12.1% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pacific Northwest
Average |
2,278 | 1,247 | 1,109 | 12.4% | 95.9% | 96.2% | (0.3% | ) | 16,347 | 14,582 | 12.1% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Northern California |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
San Jose, CA |
4,292 | 1,672 | 1,517 | 10.2% | 97.3% | 96.9% | 0.4% | 41,895 | 37,886 | 10.6% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Oakland-East Bay, CA |
1,955 | 1,370 | 1,264 | 8.4% | 96.7% | 96.8% | (0.1% | ) | 15,541 | 14,355 | 8.3% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
San Francisco, CA |
1,862 | 1,960 | 1,814 | 8.0% | 95.9% | 96.6% | (0.7% | ) | 21,007 | 19,569 | 7.3% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Northern California
Average |
8,109 | 1,666 | 1,525 | 9.2% | 96.8% | 96.8% | 0.0% | 78,443 | 71,810 | 9.2% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Southern California |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Los Angeles, CA |
1,198 | 1,649 | 1,551 | 6.3% | 95.5% | 95.6% | (0.1% | ) | 11,322 | 10,659 | 6.2% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
San Diego, CA |
1,058 | 1,450 | 1,377 | 5.3% | 95.5% | 95.8% | (0.3% | ) | 8,794 | 8,377 | 5.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Orange County, CA |
916 | 1,446 | 1,355 | 6.7% | 96.4% | 96.2% | 0.2% | 7,657 | 7,166 | 6.9% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Southern California
Average |
3,172 | 1,523 | 1,437 | 6.0% | 95.8% | 95.8% | 0.0% | 27,773 | 26,202 | 6.0% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average/Total
Established |
31,431 | $ | 1,776 | $ | 1,663 | 6.8% | 96.1% | 96.5% | (0.4% | ) | $ | 321,954 | $ | 302,481 | 6.4% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
(1) | Established Communities are communities with stabilized occupancy and operating expenses as of January 1, 2006 such that a comparison of 2006 to 2007 is meaningful. | |
(2) | Reflects the effect of concessions amortized over the average lease term. |
Attachment 7
AvalonBay Communities, Inc.
Summary of Development and Redevelopment Activity (1) as of June 30, 2007
Summary of Development and Redevelopment Activity (1) as of June 30, 2007
Number | Number | Total | ||||||||||||||
of | of | Capital Cost (2) | ||||||||||||||
Communities | Homes | (millions) | ||||||||||||||
Portfolio Additions: |
(3 | ) | ||||||||||||||
2007 Annual Completions |
||||||||||||||||
Development |
7 | 1,659 | $ | 377.8 | ||||||||||||
Redevelopment |
(4 | ) | 3 | 1,573 | 26.0 | |||||||||||
Total Additions |
10 | 3,232 | $ | 403.8 | ||||||||||||
2006 Annual Completions |
||||||||||||||||
Development |
6 | 1,368 | $ | 375.2 | ||||||||||||
Redevelopment |
(4 | ) | 2 | 506 | 10.1 | |||||||||||
Total Additions |
8 | 1,874 | $ | 385.3 | ||||||||||||
Pipeline Activity: |
(3 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Currently Under Construction |
||||||||||||||||
Development |
19 | 5,819 | $ | 1,685.5 | ||||||||||||
Redevelopment |
(4 | ) | 7 | 2,188 | 44.3 | |||||||||||
Subtotal |
26 | 8,007 | $ | 1,729.8 | ||||||||||||
Planning |
||||||||||||||||
Development Rights |
53 | 14,108 | $ | 4,124.0 | ||||||||||||
Total Pipeline |
79 | 22,115 | $ | 5,853.8 | ||||||||||||
(1) | Represents activity for consolidated and unconsolidated entities. | |
(2) | See Attachment #14 Definitions and Reconciliations of Non-GAAP Financial Measures and Other Terms. | |
(3) | Information represents projections and estimates. | |
(4) | Represents only cost of redevelopment activity, does not include original acquisition cost. |
This chart contains forward-looking statements. Please see the paragraph regarding forward-looking
statements on the Table of Contents page relating to the Companys Supplemental Operating and
Financial Data for the second quarter of 2007.
Attachment 8
AvalonBay Communities, Inc.
Development Communities as of June 30, 2007
Development Communities as of June 30, 2007
Percentage | Total | Avg | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ownership | # of | Capital | Schedule | Rent | % Occ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Upon | Apt | Cost (1) | Initial | Stabilized | Per | % Comp | % Leased | Physical | Economic | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Completion | Homes | (millions) | Start | Occupancy | Complete | Ops (1) | Home (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (1) (5) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Inclusive of | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Concessions | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
See Attachment #14 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Under Construction: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1. Avalon Wilshire |
100 | % | 123 | $ | 46.6 | Q1 2005 | Q2 2007 | Q3 2007 | Q4 2007 | $ | 2,795 | 100.0 | % | 62.6 | % | 43.1 | % | 8.8 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Los Angeles, CA |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2. Avalon Lyndhurst (6) |
100 | % | 328 | 78.8 | Q3 2005 | Q4 2006 | Q3 2007 | Q1 2008 | 2,200 | 100.0 | % | 80.2 | % | 74.7 | % | 42.6 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lyndhurst, NJ |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3. Avalon Riverview North |
100 | % | 602 | 175.6 | Q3 2005 | Q3 2007 | Q3 2008 | Q1 2009 | 2,830 | 11.5 | % | 49.5 | % | 9.1 | % | N/A | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
New York, NY |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4. Avalon at Glen Cove North |
100 | % | 111 | 41.4 | Q4 2005 | Q1 2007 | Q3 2007 | Q1 2008 | 2,390 | 100.0 | % | 47.7 | % | 46.8 | % | 17.5 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Glen Cove, NY |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5. Avalon Danvers (7) |
100 | % | 433 | 84.8 | Q4 2005 | Q1 2007 | Q3 2008 | Q1 2009 | 1,535 | 47.3 | % | 34.9 | % | 30.3 | % | 15.3 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Danvers, MA |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6. Avalon Woburn |
100 | % | 446 | 83.1 | Q4 2005 | Q3 2006 | Q4 2007 | Q2 2008 | 1,575 | 73.1 | % | 83.9 | % | 68.4 | % | 47.6 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Woburn, MA |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7. Avalon on the Sound II |
100 | % | 588 | 184.2 | Q1 2006 | Q2 2007 | Q2 2008 | Q4 2008 | 2,535 | 33.7 | % | 30.3 | % | 19.6 | % | 3.6 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
New Rochelle, NY |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
8. Avalon Meydenbauer |
100 | % | 368 | 84.3 | Q1 2006 | Q4 2007 | Q3 2008 | Q1 2009 | 1,625 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bellevue, WA |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9. Avalon at Dublin Station I |
100 | % | 305 | 85.8 | Q2 2006 | Q4 2007 | Q2 2008 | Q4 2008 | 1,995 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dublin, CA |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
10. Avalon at Lexington Hills |
100 | % | 387 | 86.2 | Q2 2006 | Q2 2007 | Q3 2008 | Q1 2009 | 1,975 | 17.1 | % | 22.0 | % | 11.1 | % | 2.7 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lexington, MA |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
11. Avalon Bowery Place II (8) |
100 | % | 90 | 61.9 | Q3 2006 | Q4 2007 | Q1 2008 | Q2 2008 | 3,490 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
New York, NY |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
12. Avalon Encino |
100 | % | 131 | 61.5 | Q3 2006 | Q3 2008 | Q4 2008 | Q1 2009 | 2,650 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Los Angeles, CA |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
13. Avalon Canoga Park |
100 | % | 210 | 53.9 | Q4 2006 | Q1 2008 | Q2 2008 | Q4 2008 | 2,020 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Canoga Park, CA |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
14. Avalon Acton (8) |
100 | % | 380 | 68.8 | Q4 2006 | Q1 2008 | Q4 2008 | Q2 2009 | 1,470 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Acton, MA |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15. Avalon Morningside Park (8) |
100 | % | 296 | 125.5 | Q1 2007 | Q3 2008 | Q1 2009 | Q3 2009 | 3,640 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
New York, NY |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
16. Avalon White Plains |
100 | % | 393 | 154.5 | Q2 2007 | Q4 2008 | Q2 2009 | Q4 2009 | 2,820 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
White Plains, NY |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
17. Avalon at Tinton Falls |
100 | % | 216 | 41.2 | Q2 2007 | Q3 2008 | Q4 2008 | Q2 2009 | 1,760 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tinton Falls, NJ |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
18. Avalon Fashion Valley |
100 | % | 161 | 64.7 | Q2 2007 | Q4 2008 | Q1 2009 | Q2 2009 | 2,380 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
San Diego, CA |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
19. Avalon Anaheim |
100 | % | 251 | 102.7 | Q2 2007 | Q2 2009 | Q3 2009 | Q1 2010 | 2,530 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Anaheim, CA |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subtotal/Weighted Average |
5,819 | $ | 1,685.5 | $ | 2,415 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Completed this Quarter: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1. Avalon Shrewsbury |
100 | % | 251 | 35.9 | Q3 2005 | Q2 2006 | Q2 2007 | Q4 2007 | 1,335 | 100.0 | % | 99.2 | % | 97.6 | % | 82.7 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shrewsbury, MA |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subtotal/Weighted Average |
251 | $ | 35.9 | $ | 1,335 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total/Weighted Average |
6,070 | $ | 1,721.4 | $ | 2,395 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted Average Projected NOI |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
as a % of Total Capital Cost (1) (9) |
6.5 | % | Inclusive of Concessions See Attachment #14 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-Stabilized Development Communities: (10) |
% Economic | Asset Cost Basis, Non-Stabilized Development | Source | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Occ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prior Quarter Completions: | (1) (5) | Capital Cost, Prior Quarter Completions | $ | 217.6 | Att. 8 (less JV partner share) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Avalon at Mission Bay North II |
313 | $ | 108.2 | Capital Cost, Current Completions | 35.9 | Att. 8 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Avalon Bowery Place I |
206 | 98.5 | Capital Cost, Under Construction | 1,685.5 | Att. 8 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Avalon Chestnut Hill |
204 | 61.2 | Less: Remaining to Invest, Under Construction | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Avalon at Decoverly II |
196 | 30.8 | Total Remaining to Invest | 974.3 | Att. 10 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
919 | $ | 298.7 | 86.3% | Capital Cost, Projected Q3 2007 Starts | (253.9 | ) | Att. 10, Footnote 5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(720.4 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Asset Cost Basis, Non-Stabilized Development | $ | 1,218.6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Q2 2007 Net Operating Income/(Deficit) for communities under construction and non-stabilized
development communities was $3.2 million. See Attachment #14.
(1) | See Attachment #14 Definitions and Reconciliations of Non-GAAP Financial Measures and Other Terms. | |
(2) | Includes apartment homes for which construction has been completed and accepted by management as of July 27, 2007. | |
(3) | Includes apartment homes for which leases have been executed or non-refundable deposits have been paid as of July 27, 2007. | |
(4) | Physical occupancy based on apartment homes occupied as of July 27, 2007. | |
(5) | Represents Economic Occupancy for the second quarter of 2007. | |
(6) | The remediation of the Companys Avalon Lyndhurst development site, as discussed in the Companys second quarter 2006 Earnings Release, is complete. The net cost associated with the remediation effort after considering insurance proceeds received to date, including costs associated with construction delays, is expected to total approximately $6.0 million. The Company is pursuing the recovery of these additional costs through insurance as well as from the third parties involved, but any additional recoverable amounts are not currently estimable. The Total Capital Cost and yield cited above do not reflect the potential impact of these additional net costs. | |
(7) | Avalon Danvers experienced a fire in April 2007. The Total Capital Cost and yield cited above do not reflect the impact of the fire as the effect is not yet fully estimable. | |
The Company expects insurance proceeds will substantially cover all losses. | ||
(8) | This community is being financed in part by third-party tax-exempt debt. | |
(9) | The Weighted Average calculation is based on the Companys pro rata share of the Total Capital Cost for each community. | |
(10) | Represents Development Communities completed in prior quarters that had not achieved Stabilized Operations for the entire current quarter. Estimates are based on the Companys pro rata share of the Total Capital Cost for each community. | |
This chart contains forward-looking statements. Please see the paragraph regarding forward-looking statements on the Table of Contents page relating to the Companys Supplemental Operating and Financial Data for the second quarter of 2007. |
Attachment 9
AvalonBay Communities, Inc.
Redevelopment Communities as of June 30, 2007
Redevelopment Communities as of June 30, 2007
Cost (millions) | Schedule | Avg | Number of Homes | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
# of | Pre- | Total | Rent | Out of | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Percentage | Apt | Redevelopment | Capital | Acquisition / | Restabilized | Per | Completed | Service | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ownership | Homes | Capital Cost | Cost (1)(2) | Completion | Start | Complete | Ops (2) | Home (2) | to date | @ 6/30/07 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Inclusive of | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Concessions | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
See Attachment #14 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Under Redevelopment: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AvalonBay |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1. Avalon Walk I and II (3) |
100 | % | 764 | $ | 59.4 | $ | 71.2 | Q3 1992 | Q1 2006 | Q4 2007 | Q2 2008 | $ | 1,320 | 644 | 33 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hamden, CT |
Q3 1994 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2. Avalon at AutumnWoods |
100 | % | 420 | 31.2 | 38.3 | Q4 1996 | Q3 2006 | Q3 2008 | Q1 2009 | 1,365 | 265 | 20 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fairfax, VA |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subtotal |
1,184 | $ | 90.6 | $ | 109.5 | $ | 1,335 | 909 | 53 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment Management Fund (The Fund) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1. Avalon Redmond (4) |
15 | % | 400 | 49.2 | 56.7 | Q4 2004 | Q2 2006 | Q4 2007 | Q2 2008 | 1,340 | 350 | 10 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Redmond, WA |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2. Civic Center Place |
15 | % | 192 | 38.1 | 43.5 | Q4 2005 | Q4 2006 | Q2 2008 | Q4 2008 | 1,695 | 114 | 12 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Norwalk, CA |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3. Avalon at Poplar Creek |
15 | % | 196 | 25.2 | 28.6 | Q2 2006 | Q4 2006 | Q1 2008 | Q3 2008 | 1,245 | 105 | 7 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Schaumburg, IL |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4. Avalon Sunset (5) |
15 | % | 82 | 17.9 | 21.3 | Q4 2005 | Q1 2007 | Q1 2008 | Q3 2008 | 2,010 | 55 | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Los Angeles, CA |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5. Paseo Park |
15 | % | 134 | 19.8 | 25.5 | Q4 2005 | Q2 2007 | Q2 2008 | Q4 2008 | 1,515 | 18 | 13 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fremont, CA |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subtotal |
1,004 | $ | 150.2 | $ | 175.6 | $ | 1,470 | 642 | 46 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total/Weighted Average |
2,188 | $ | 240.8 | $ | 285.1 | $ | 1,395 | 1,551 | 99 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted Average Projected NOI |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
as a % of Total Capital Cost (2) |
10.7 | % | Inclusive of Concessions See Attachment #14 |
(1) | Inclusive of acquisition cost. | |
(2) | See Attachment #14 Definitions and Reconciliations of Non-GAAP Financial Measures and Other Terms. | |
(3) | This community was developed by a predecessor of the Company. Phase I was completed in Q3 1992 and Phase II was completed in Q3 1994. | |
(4) | This community, formerly known as Ravenswood at the Park, was acquired in Q4 2004 and was transferred to a subsidiary of the Fund in Q1 2005, reducing the Companys indirect equity interest in the community to 15%. | |
(5) | This community was formerly known as Fuller Martel. | |
This chart contains forward-looking statements. Please see the paragraph regarding forward-looking statements on the Table of Contents page relating to the Companys Supplemental Operating and Financial Data for the second quarter of 2007. |
Attachment 10
AvalonBay Communities, Inc.
Summary of Development and Redevelopment Community Activity (1) as of June 30, 2007
(Dollars in Thousands)
Summary of Development and Redevelopment Community Activity (1) as of June 30, 2007
(Dollars in Thousands)
DEVELOPMENT (2)
Apt Homes | Total Capital | Cost of Homes | Construction in | |||||||||||||||||
Completed & | Cost Invested | Completed & | Remaining to | Progress at | ||||||||||||||||
Occupied | During Period (3) | Occupied (4) | Invest (5) | Period End (6) | ||||||||||||||||
Total - 2005 Actual |
1,480 | $ | 347,839 | $ | 219,046 | $ | 881,012 | $ | 377,320 | |||||||||||
2006 Actual: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Quarter 1 |
267 | $ | 113,125 | $ | 47,014 | $ | 952,410 | $ | 468,401 | |||||||||||
Quarter 2 |
302 | 155,381 | 59,948 | 915,400 | 570,875 | |||||||||||||||
Quarter 3 |
509 | 174,587 | 86,515 | 1,007,188 | 593,160 | |||||||||||||||
Quarter 4 |
449 | 209,735 | 117,678 | 919,358 | 626,034 | |||||||||||||||
Total - 2006 Actual |
1,527 | $ | 652,828 | $ | 311,155 | |||||||||||||||
2007 Projected: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Quarter 1 (Actual) |
464 | $ | 167,109 | $ | 106,100 | $ | 908,630 | $ | 673,945 | |||||||||||
Quarter 2 (Actual) |
724 | 240,036 | 165,064 | 974,266 | 798,358 | |||||||||||||||
Quarter 3 (Projected) |
812 | 256,093 | 218,106 | 718,174 | 789,219 | |||||||||||||||
Quarter 4 (Projected) |
612 | 180,227 | 186,925 | 542,705 | 692,216 | |||||||||||||||
Total - 2007 Projected |
2,612 | $ | 843,465 | $ | 676,195 | |||||||||||||||
REDEVELOPMENT
Total Capital | Reconstruction in | |||||||||||||||
Avg Homes | Cost Invested | Remaining to | Progress at | |||||||||||||
Out of Service | During Period (3) | Invest (5) | Period End (6) | |||||||||||||
Total - 2005 Actual |
$ | 8,972 | $ | 13,456 | $ | 7,877 | ||||||||||
2006 Actual: |
||||||||||||||||
Quarter 1 |
32 | $ | 3,433 | $ | 18,443 | $ | 8,502 | |||||||||
Quarter 2 |
60 | 3,474 | 21,760 | 10,206 | ||||||||||||
Quarter 3 |
89 | 4,258 | 18,549 | 14,763 | ||||||||||||
Quarter 4 |
60 | 4,378 | 14,991 | 17,602 | ||||||||||||
Total - 2006 Actual |
$ | 15,543 | ||||||||||||||
2007 Projected: |
||||||||||||||||
Quarter 1 (Actual) |
63 | $ | 3,332 | $ | 21,704 | $ | 14,538 | |||||||||
Quarter 2 (Actual) |
105 | 3,014 | 24,290 | 16,403 | ||||||||||||
Quarter 3 (Projected) |
95 | 7,460 | 16,830 | 18,925 | ||||||||||||
Quarter 4 (Projected) |
53 | 5,743 | 11,087 | 10,708 | ||||||||||||
Total - 2007 Projected |
$ | 19,549 | ||||||||||||||
(1) | Data is presented for all communities currently under development or redevelopment and those communities for which development or redevelopment is expected to begin within the next 90 days. | |
(2) | Projected periods include data for consolidated joint ventures at 100%. The offset for joint venture partners participation is reflected as minority interest. | |
(3) | Represents Total Capital Cost incurred or expected to be incurred during the quarter, year or in total. See Attachment #14 Definitions and Reconciliations of Non-GAAP Financial Measures and Other Terms. | |
(4) | Represents projected Total Capital Cost of apartment homes completed and occupied during the quarter. Calculated by dividing Total Capital Cost for each Development Community by number of homes for the community, multiplied by the number of homes completed and occupied during the quarter. | |
(5) | Represents projected Total Capital Cost remaining to invest on communities currently under development or redevelopment and those for which development or redevelopment is expected to begin within the next 90 days. Remaining to invest for Q2 2007 includes $253.9 million attributed to four anticipated Q3 2007 development starts and $16.0 million related to three anticipated Q3 2007 redevelopment starts. | |
(6) | Represents period end balance of construction or reconstruction costs. Amount for Q2 2007 includes $3.8 million related to five unconsolidated investments in the Fund, and is reflected in other assets for financial reporting purposes. |
This chart contains forward-looking statements. Please see the paragraph regarding
forward-looking statements on the Table of Contents page relating to the Companys Supplemental
Operating and Financial Data for the second quarter of 2007.
Attachment 11
AvalonBay Communities, Inc.
Future Development as of June 30, 2007
Future Development as of June 30, 2007
DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (1)
Estimated | Total | |||||||||||||
Number | Capital Cost (1) | |||||||||||||
Location of Development Right | of Homes | (millions) | ||||||||||||
1. |
Union City, CA | (2 | ) | 438 | 125 | |||||||||
2. |
Sharon, MA | 156 | 31 | |||||||||||
3. |
Hingham, MA | (2 | ) | 235 | 52 | |||||||||
4. |
Coram, NY | (2 | ) | 200 | 46 | |||||||||
5. |
Brooklyn, NY | (2 | ) | 628 | 317 | |||||||||
6. |
Irvine, CA | (2 | ) | 279 | 76 | |||||||||
7. |
San Francisco, CA Phase III | (2 | ) | 260 | 165 | |||||||||
8. |
Northborough, MA | 350 | 60 | |||||||||||
9. |
Pleasant Hill, CA | (4 | ) | 416 | 153 | |||||||||
10. |
Norwalk, CT | 311 | 80 | |||||||||||
11. |
Los Angeles, CA | (2 | ) | 174 | 78 | |||||||||
12. |
Andover, MA | (2 | ) | 115 | 21 | |||||||||
13. |
Kirkland, WA Phase II | (2 | ) | 181 | 60 | |||||||||
14. |
Wilton, CT | (2 | ) | 100 | 24 | |||||||||
15. |
New York, NY II | 680 | 261 | |||||||||||
16. |
Dublin, CA Phase II | 200 | 52 | |||||||||||
17. |
Dublin, CA Phase III | 205 | 53 | |||||||||||
18. |
Bellevue, WA | 408 | 126 | |||||||||||
19. |
Irvine, CA III | 170 | 73 | |||||||||||
20. |
Shelton, CT III | 242 | 54 | |||||||||||
21. |
Camarillo, CA | 376 | 55 | |||||||||||
22. |
Bloomingdale, NJ | 173 | 38 | |||||||||||
23. |
North Bergen, NJ | (3 | ) | 164 | 48 | |||||||||
24. |
Seattle, WA | 201 | 65 | |||||||||||
25. |
Quincy, MA | (2 | ) | 146 | 24 | |||||||||
26. |
Shelton, CT | 302 | 49 | |||||||||||
27. |
Cohasset, MA | (2 | ) | 200 | 38 | |||||||||
28. |
Canoga Park, CA | (2 | ) | 297 | 85 | |||||||||
29. |
West Long Branch, NJ | (3 | ) | 180 | 34 | |||||||||
30. |
Shelton, CT II | 99 | 29 | |||||||||||
31. |
Greenburgh, NY Phase II | 444 | 112 | |||||||||||
32. |
Brooklyn, NY II | 825 | 443 | |||||||||||
33. |
Highland Park, NJ | 285 | 67 | |||||||||||
34. |
San Francisco, CA | 157 | 50 | |||||||||||
35. |
Milford, CT | (2 | ) | 284 | 45 | |||||||||
36. |
Plymouth, MA Phase II | 69 | 17 | |||||||||||
37. |
Stratford, CT | (2 | ) | 146 | 23 | |||||||||
38. |
Oyster Bay, NY | (2 | ) | 150 | 42 | |||||||||
39. |
Randolph, NJ | 115 | 31 | |||||||||||
40. |
Hackensack, NJ | 230 | 56 | |||||||||||
41. |
Garden City, NY | 160 | 58 | |||||||||||
42. |
Roselle Park, NJ | (3 | ) | 300 | 70 | |||||||||
43. |
Yonkers, NY | 400 | 88 | |||||||||||
44. |
Irvine, CA II | 179 | 57 | |||||||||||
45. |
Alexandria, VA | (2 | ) | 283 | 73 | |||||||||
46. |
Tysons Corner, VA | (2 | ) | 439 | 121 | |||||||||
47. |
Gaithersburg, MD | 254 | 41 | |||||||||||
48. |
Oakland, NJ | 228 | 49 | |||||||||||
49. |
Plainview, NY | 160 | 38 | |||||||||||
50. |
Wheaton, MD | (2 | ) | 320 | 107 | |||||||||
51. |
Wanaque, NJ | 210 | 45 | |||||||||||
52. |
Yaphank, NY | (2 | ) | 343 | 57 | |||||||||
53. |
Rockville, MD | (2 | ) | 241 | 62 | |||||||||
Total | 14,108 | $ | 4,124 | |||||||||||
(1) | See Attachment #14 Definitions and Reconciliations of Non-GAAP Financial Measures and Other Terms. | |
(2) | Company owns land, but construction has not yet begun. | |
(3) | This Development Right is subject to a joint venture arrangement. | |
(4) | This Development Right is subject to a joint venture arrangement. In connection with the pursuit of this Development Right, $125 million in bond financing was issued and immediately invested in a guaranteed investment contract (GIC) administered by a trustee. The Company does not have any equity or economic interest in the joint venture entity at this time, but has an option to make a capital contribution to the joint venture entity for a 99% general partner interest. Should the Company exercise this option, the bond proceeds will be released from the GIC and used for future construction of the Development Right. Should the Company decide not to exercise this option, the bond proceeds will be redeemed to the issuer. |
This chart contains forward-looking statements. Please see the paragraph regarding
forward-looking statements on the Table of Contents page relating to the Companys Supplemental
Operating and Financial Data for the second quarter of 2007.
Attachment 12
AvalonBay Communities, Inc.
Unconsolidated Real Estate Investments (1) as of June 30, 2007
(Dollars in Thousands)
Unconsolidated Real Estate Investments (1) as of June 30, 2007
(Dollars in Thousands)
AVB | AVBs | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
# of | Total | Book | Outstanding Debt | Share | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unconsolidated | Percentage | Apt | Capital | Value | Interest | Maturity | of Partnership | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Real Estate Investments | Ownership | Homes | Cost (2) | Investment (3) | Amount | Type | Rate | Date | Debt | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AvalonBay Value Added Fund, LP | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1. | Avalon at Redondo Beach |
N/A | 105 | $ | 24,408 | N/A | $ | 16,765 | Fixed | 4.84 | % | Oct 2011 | $ | 2,548 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Los Angeles, CA |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2. | Avalon Lakeside |
N/A | 204 | 18,053 | N/A | 12,056 | Fixed | 5.74 | % | Mar 2012 | 1,833 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Chicago, IL |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3. | Avalon Columbia |
N/A | 170 | 29,240 | N/A | 22,275 | Fixed | 5.48 | % | Apr 2012 | 3,386 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baltimore, MD |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4. | Avalon Redmond |
N/A | 400 | 54,964 | N/A | 36,500 | Fixed | 4.96 | % | Jul 2012 | 5,548 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Seattle, WA |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5. | Avalon Sunset |
N/A | 82 | 19,387 | N/A | 11,500 | Fixed | 5.41 | % | Feb 2014 | 1,748 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Los Angeles, CA |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6. | Avalon at Poplar Creek |
N/A | 196 | 26,478 | N/A | 16,500 | Fixed | 4.83 | % | Oct 2012 | 2,508 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Chicago, IL |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7. | Civic Center Place (4) |
N/A | 192 | 40,852 | N/A | 23,806 | Fixed | 5.29 | % | Aug 2013 | 3,619 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Norwalk, CA |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
8. | Paseo Park |
N/A | 134 | 20,524 | N/A | 11,800 | Fixed | 5.74 | % | Nov 2013 | 1,794 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fremont, CA |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9. | Avalon at Yerba Buena |
N/A | 160 | 66,537 | N/A | 41,500 | Fixed | 5.88 | % | Mar 2014 | 6,308 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
San Francisco, CA |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
10. | Avalon at Aberdeen Station |
N/A | 290 | 58,123 | N/A | 34,456 | Fixed | 5.73 | % | Sep 2013 | 5,237 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Aberdeen, NJ |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
11. | The Springs |
N/A | 320 | 47,621 | N/A | 26,000 | Fixed | 6.06 | % | Oct 2014 | 3,952 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Corona, CA |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
12. | The Covington |
N/A | 256 | 32,311 | N/A | 17,243 | Fixed | 5.43 | % | Jan 2014 | 2,621 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lombard, IL |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
13. | Cedar Valley |
N/A | 156 | 20,837 | N/A | 12,000 | Fixed | 5.68 | % | Feb 2014 | 1,824 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Columbia, MD |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
14. | Avalon Centerpoint |
N/A | 392 | 78,780 | N/A | 45,000 | Variable | 6.57 | % | Jul 2007 | 6,840 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baltimore, MD |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15. | Middlesex Crossing |
N/A | 252 | 37,174 | N/A | 24,100 | Fixed | 5.49 | % | Dec 2013 | 3,663 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Billerica, MA |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
16. | Avalon Crystal Hill |
N/A | 168 | 38,006 | N/A | 24,500 | Fixed | 5.43 | % | Dec 2013 | 3,724 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ponoma, NY |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
17. | Skyway Terrace |
N/A | 348 | 74,140 | N/A | | N/A | N/A | N/A | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
San Jose, CA |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fund corporate debt |
N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 170,000 | Variable | 6.28 | % | 2008 | (5) | 25,840 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.2 | % | 3,825 | $ | 687,435 | $ | 107,495 | $ | 546,001 | $ | 82,993 | (6) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Operating Joint Ventures | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1. | Avalon Grove |
(7 | ) | 402 | $ | 51,805 | $ | 7,615 | $ | | N/A | N/A | N/A | $ | | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Stamford, CT |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2. | Avalon Chrystie Place I (7) |
20.0 | % | 361 | 130,664 | 25,812 | 117,000 | Variable | 3.76 | % | Nov 2036 | 23,400 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
New York, NY |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3. | Avalon at Mission Bay North II (7) (8) |
25.0 | % | 313 | 127,276 | 25,362 | 85,336 | Variable | 6.82 | % | Sep 2008 (9) | 21,334 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
San Francisco, CA |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1,076 | $ | 309,745 | $ | 58,789 | $ | 202,336 | $ | 44,734 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4,901 | $ | 997,180 | $ | 166,284 | $ | 748,337 | $ | 127,727 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(1) | Schedule does not include one community (Avalon Del Rey) that completed development in the third quarter of 2006 under a joint venture arrangement. AVB owns 30% of this community, however due to the Companys continuing involvement, it is consolidated for financial reporting purposes. | |
(2) | See Attachment #14 Definitions and Reconciliations of Non-GAAP Financial Measures and Other Terms. | |
(3) | These unconsolidated real estate investments are accounted for under the equity method of accounting. AVB Book Value Investment represents the Companys recorded equity investment plus the Companys pro rata share of outstanding debt. | |
(4) | This communitys debt is a combination of two separate fixed rate loans which both mature in August 2013. The first loan totals $18,154 at a 5.04% interest rate and was assumed by the Fund upon purchase of this community. The second loan was procured in connection with the acquisition in the amount of $5,652 at a 6.08% interest rate. The rate listed in the table above represents a weighted average interest rate. | |
(5) | As of June 30, 2007, these borrowings include $140,000 in borrowings under the Funds credit facility secured by uncalled capital commitments maturing in January 2008 and $30,000 in borrowings under a separate unsecured credit facility maturing in December 2008. | |
(6) | The Company has not guaranteed the debt of the Fund and bears no responsibility for the repayment. | |
(7) | After the venture makes certain threshold distributions to the third-party partner, the Company generally receives 50% of all further distributions. | |
(8) | Total Capital Cost for this community represents the capitalized costs incurred and projected to incur as part of the development completion, and is not the gross real estate cost as recorded by the joint venture as of June 30, 2007. | |
(9) | The maturity date as reflected on this attachment may be extended to September 2010 upon exercise of two one-year extension options. |
Attachment 13
AvalonBay Communities, Inc.
Summary of Disposition Activity (1) as of June 30, 2007
(Dollars in thousands)
Summary of Disposition Activity (1) as of June 30, 2007
(Dollars in thousands)
Weighted | Accumulated | Weighted Average | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of | Average | Gross Sales | Depreciation | Economic | Initial Year | Weighted Average | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Communities Sold | Holding Period (2) | Price | GAAP Gain | and Other | Gain (3) | Mkt. Cap Rate (2) (3) | Unleveraged IRR (2) (3) | |||||||||||||||||||||
1998: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9 Communities |
$ | 170,312 | $ | 25,270 | $ | 23,438 | $ | 1,832 | 8.1 | % | 16.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||
1999: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
16 Communities |
$ | 317,712 | $ | 47,093 | $ | 27,150 | $ | 19,943 | 8.3 | % | 12.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||
2000: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
8 Communities |
$ | 160,085 | $ | 40,779 | $ | 6,262 | $ | 34,517 | 7.9 | % | 15.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||
2001: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7 Communities |
$ | 241,130 | $ | 62,852 | $ | 21,623 | $ | 41,229 | 8.0 | % | 14.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||
2002: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Community |
$ | 80,100 | $ | 48,893 | $ | 7,462 | $ | 41,431 | 5.4 | % | 20.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||
2003: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
12 Communities, 1 Land Parcel (4) |
$ | 460,600 | $ | 184,438 | $ | 52,613 | $ | 131,825 | 6.3 | % | 15.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||
2004: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5 Communities, 1 Land Parcel |
$ | 250,977 | $ | 122,425 | $ | 19,320 | $ | 103,105 | 4.8 | % | 16.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||
2005: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7 Communities, 1 Office Building, 3 Land Parcels (5) |
$ | 382,720 | $ | 199,766 | $ | 14,929 | $ | 184,838 | 3.8 | % | 18.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||
2006: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4 Communities, 3 Land Parcels (6) |
$ | 281,485 | $ | 117,539 | $ | 21,699 | $ | 95,840 | 4.6 | % | 15.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||
2007: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Land Parcel (2) |
$ | 5,800 | $ | 545 | $ | | $ | 545 | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||||||||||
1998 - 2007 Total |
6.2 | $ | 2,350,921 | $ | 849,600 | $ | 194,496 | $ | 655,105 | 6.2 | % | 15.5 | % | |||||||||||||||
(1) | Activity excludes dispositions to joint venture entities in which the Company retains an economic interest. | |
(2) | For purposes of this attachment, land sales and the disposition of an office building are not included in the calculation of Weighted Average Holding Period, Weighted Average Initial Year Market Cap Rate, or Weighted Average Unleveraged IRR. | |
(3) | See Attachment #14 Definitions and Reconciliations of Non-GAAP Financial Measures and Other Terms. | |
(4) | 2003 GAAP gain, for purposes of this attachment, includes $23,448 related to the sale of a community in which the Company held a 50% membership interest. | |
(5) | 2005 GAAP gain includes the recovery of an impairment loss of $3,000 recorded in 2002 related to one of the land parcels sold in 2005. This loss was recorded to reflect the land at fair value based on its entitlement status at the time it was determined to be planned for disposition. | |
(6) | 2006 GAAP gain, for purposes of this attachment, includes $6,609 related to the sale of a community in which the Company held a 25% equity interest. |
Attachment 14
AvalonBay Communities, Inc.
Definitions and Reconciliations of Non-GAAP Financial Measures and Other Terms
Definitions and Reconciliations of Non-GAAP Financial Measures and Other Terms
This release, including its attachments, contains certain non-GAAP financial measures and other
terms. The definition and calculation of these non-GAAP financial measures and other terms may
differ from the definitions and methodologies used by other REITs and, accordingly, may not be
comparable. The non-GAAP financial measures referred to below should not be considered an
alternative to net income as an indication of our performance. In addition, these non-GAAP
financial measures do not represent cash generated from operating activities in accordance with
GAAP and therefore should not be considered as an alternative measure of liquidity or as indicative
of cash available to fund cash needs.
FFO is determined based on a definition adopted by the Board of Governors of the National
Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (NAREIT). FFO is calculated by the Company as net
income or loss computed in accordance with GAAP, adjusted for gains or losses on sales of
previously depreciated operating communities, extraordinary gains or losses (as defined by GAAP),
cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle and depreciation of real estate assets,
including adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. Management generally
considers FFO to be an appropriate supplemental measure of operating performance because, by
excluding gains or losses related to dispositions of previously depreciated operating communities
and excluding real estate depreciation (which can vary among owners of identical assets in similar
condition based on historical cost accounting and useful life estimates), FFO can help one compare
the operating performance of a companys real estate between periods or as compared to different
companies. A reconciliation of FFO to net income is as follows (dollars in thousands):
Q2 | Q2 | YTD | YTD | |||||||||||||
2007 | 2006(1) | 2007(2) | 2006(1)(2) | |||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 51,052 | $ | 67,006 | $ | 97,571 | $ | 178,120 | ||||||||
Dividends attributable to preferred stock |
(2,175 | ) | (2,175 | ) | (4,350 | ) | (4,350 | ) | ||||||||
Depreciation real estate assets,
including discontinued operations
and joint venture adjustments |
45,080 | 41,917 | 89,765 | 82,487 | ||||||||||||
Minority interest, including
discontinued operations |
84 | 99 | 172 | 198 | ||||||||||||
Gain on sale of previously depreciated
real estate assets |
| (31,992 | ) | | (97,411 | ) | ||||||||||
FFO attributable to common stockholders |
$ | 94,041 | $ | 74,855 | $ | 183,158 | $ | 159,044 | ||||||||
Average shares outstanding diluted |
80,647,514 | 75,361,911 | 80,283,143 | 75,285,946 | ||||||||||||
EPS diluted |
$ | 0.61 | $ | 0.86 | $ | 1.16 | $ | 2.31 | ||||||||
FFO per common share diluted |
$ | 1.17 | $ | 0.99 | $ | 2.28 | $ | 2.11 |
(1) | Amounts for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 have been restated from amounts previously reported to reflect a change in accounting for land leases. | |
(2) | FFO per common share diluted includes $0.01 for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and $0.17 for the six months ended June 30, 2006 related to the sale of a land parcel in each year. |
Attachment 14 (continued)
Projected FFO, as provided within this release in the Companys outlook, is calculated on a basis consistent with
historical FFO, and is therefore considered to be an appropriate supplemental measure to projected net income from projected operating performance. A reconciliation of the range provided for Projected FFO
per share (diluted) for the third quarter and full year of 2007 to the range provided for projected EPS (diluted) is as follows:
Projected FFO, as provided within this release in the Companys outlook, is calculated on a basis consistent with historical FFO, and is therefore considered to be an appropriate supplemental measure to projected net income from projected operating performance. A reconciliation of the range provided for Projected FFO per share (diluted) for the third quarter and full year of 2007 to the range provided for projected EPS (diluted) is as follows: |
Low | High | |||||||
range | range | |||||||
Projected EPS (diluted) Q3 07 |
$ | 1.99 | $ | 2.03 | ||||
Projected depreciation (real estate related) |
0.57 | 0.59 | ||||||
Projected gain on sale of operating communities |
(1.39 | ) | (1.41 | ) | ||||
Projected FFO per share (diluted) Q3 07 |
$ | 1.17 | $ | 1.21 | ||||
Projected EPS (diluted) Full Year 2007 |
$ | 3.83 | $ | 3.93 | ||||
Projected depreciation (real estate related) |
2.28 | 2.32 | ||||||
Projected gain on sale of operating communities |
(1.51 | ) | (1.55 | ) | ||||
Projected FFO per share (diluted) Full Year 2007 |
$ | 4.60 | $ | 4.70 | ||||
NOI is defined by the Company as total property revenue less direct property
operating expenses (including property taxes), and excludes corporate-level income (including
management, development and other fees), corporate-level property management and other indirect
operating expenses, investments and investment management, net interest expense, general and
administrative expense, joint venture income, minority interest expense, depreciation expense, gain
on sale of real estate assets and income from discontinued operations. The Company considers NOI to
be an appropriate supplemental measure to net income of operating performance of a community or
communities because it helps both investors and management to understand the core operations of a
community or communities prior to the allocation of corporate-level property management overhead or
general and administrative costs. This is more reflective of the operating performance of a
community, and allows for an easier comparison of the operating performance of single assets or
groups of assets. In addition, because prospective buyers of real estate have different overhead
structures, with varying marginal impact to overhead by acquiring real estate, NOI is considered by
many in the real estate industry to be a useful measure for determining the value of a real estate
asset or groups of assets.
Attachment 14 (continued)
A reconciliation of NOI (from continuing operations) to net income, as well as a breakdown of NOI
by operating segment, is as follows (dollars in thousands):
Q2 | Q2 | YTD | YTD | |||||||||||||
2007 | 2006 (1) | 2007 | 2006 (1) | |||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 51,052 | $ | 67,006 | $ | 97,571 | $ | 178,120 | ||||||||
Indirect operating expenses, net of corporate income |
7,220 | 6,911 | 14,214 | 14,338 | ||||||||||||
Investments and investment management |
2,483 | 2,398 | 4,508 | 3,869 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense, net |
22,662 | 26,115 | 46,159 | 54,311 | ||||||||||||
General and administrative expense |
6,642 | 6,479 | 13,422 | 12,762 | ||||||||||||
Joint venture income and minority interest |
653 | (79 | ) | 1,189 | (174 | ) | ||||||||||
Depreciation expense |
44,195 | 41,285 | 88,023 | 81,251 | ||||||||||||
Gain on sale of real estate assets |
| (31,992 | ) | (545 | ) | (110,577 | ) | |||||||||
Income from discontinued operations |
(539 | ) | (171 | ) | (711 | ) | (1,310 | ) | ||||||||
NOI from continuing operations |
$ | 134,368 | $ | 117,952 | $ | 263,830 | $ | 232,590 | ||||||||
Established: |
||||||||||||||||
Northeast |
$ | 46,875 | $ | 44,915 | $ | 92,278 | $ | 87,808 | ||||||||
Mid-Atlantic |
17,663 | 16,240 | 35,296 | 32,664 | ||||||||||||
Midwest |
1,910 | 1,778 | 3,678 | 3,444 | ||||||||||||
Pacific NW |
5,868 | 4,820 | 11,347 | 9,501 | ||||||||||||
No. California |
28,642 | 25,281 | 56,934 | 50,395 | ||||||||||||
So. California |
10,135 | 9,440 | 20,203 | 18,755 | ||||||||||||
Total Established |
111,093 | 102,474 | 219,736 | 202,567 | ||||||||||||
Other Stabilized |
9,351 | 5,575 | 18,247 | 10,260 | ||||||||||||
Development/Redevelopment |
13,924 | 9,903 | 25,847 | 19,763 | ||||||||||||
NOI from continuing operations |
$ | 134,368 | $ | 117,952 | $ | 263,830 | $ | 232,590 | ||||||||
(1) Amounts for the three and six months ended June 30,
2006 have been restated from amounts previously reported to reflect a change in accounting for land leases.
NOI as reported by the Company does not include the operating results from discontinued
operations (i.e., assets sold during the period January 1, 2006 through June 30, 2007). A
reconciliation of NOI from communities sold or held for sale to net income for these communities is
as follows (dollars in thousands):
Q2 | Q2 | YTD | YTD | |||||||||||||
2007 | 2006 | 2007 | 2006 | |||||||||||||
Income from discontinued operations |
$ | 539 | $ | 171 | $ | 711 | $ | 1,310 | ||||||||
Interest expense, net |
158 | 480 | 539 | 947 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation expense |
177 | 261 | 443 | 520 | ||||||||||||
NOI from discontinued operations |
$ | 874 | $ | 912 | $ | 1,693 | $ | 2,777 | ||||||||
NOI from assets sold |
$ | | $ | 72 | $ | | $ | 1,147 | ||||||||
NOI from assets held for sale |
874 | 840 | 1,693 | 1,630 | ||||||||||||
NOI from discontinued operations |
$ | 874 | $ | 912 | $ | 1,693 | $ | 2,777 | ||||||||
Attachment 14 (continued)
Projected NOI, as used within this release for certain Development and Redevelopment
Communities and in calculating the Initial Year Market Cap Rate for dispositions, represents
managements estimate, as of the date of this release (or as of the date of the buyers valuation
in the case of dispositions), of projected stabilized rental revenue minus projected stabilized
operating expenses. For Development and Redevelopment Communities, Projected NOI is calculated
based on the first year of Stabilized Operations, as defined below, following the completion of
construction. In calculating the Initial Year Market Cap Rate, Projected NOI for dispositions is
calculated for the first twelve months following the date of the buyers valuation. Projected
stabilized rental revenue represents Managements estimate of projected gross potential (based on
leased rents for occupied homes and Market Rents, as defined below, for vacant homes) minus
projected economic vacancy and adjusted for concessions. Projected stabilized operating expenses
do not include interest, income taxes (if any), depreciation or amortization, or any allocation of
corporate-level property management overhead or general and administrative costs. The weighted
average Projected NOI as a percentage of Total Capital Cost is weighted based on the Companys
share of the Total Capital Cost of each community, based on its percentage ownership.
Management believes that Projected NOI of the development and redevelopment communities, on an
aggregated weighted average basis, assists investors in understanding Managements estimate of the
likely impact on operations of the Development and Redevelopment Communities when the assets are
complete and achieve stabilized occupancy (before allocation of any corporate-level property
management overhead, general and administrative costs or interest expense). However, in this
release the Company has not given a projection of NOI on a company-wide basis. Given the different
dates and fiscal years for which NOI is projected for these communities, the projected allocation
of corporate-level property management overhead, general and administrative costs and interest
expense to communities under development or redevelopment is complex, impractical to develop, and
may not be meaningful. Projected NOI of these communities is not a projection of the Companys
overall financial performance or cash flow. There can be no assurance that the communities under
development or redevelopment will achieve the Projected NOI as described in this release.
Rental Revenue with Concessions on a Cash Basis is considered by the Company to be a
supplemental measure to rental revenue in conformity with GAAP to help investors evaluate the
impact of both current and historical concessions on GAAP based rental revenue and to more readily
enable comparisons to revenue as reported by other companies. In addition, rental revenue (with
concessions on a cash basis) allows an investor to understand the historical trend in cash
concessions.
A reconciliation of rental revenue from Established Communities in conformity with GAAP to rental
revenue (with concessions on a cash basis) is as follows (dollars in thousands):
Q2 | Q2 | |||||||
2007 | 2006 | |||||||
Rental revenue (GAAP basis) |
$ | 162,448 | $ | 152,853 | ||||
Concessions amortized |
1,490 | 3,702 | ||||||
Concessions granted |
(2,047 | ) | (1,849 | ) | ||||
Rental revenue (with
concessions on a cash basis) |
$ | 161,891 | $ | 154,706 | ||||
% change GAAP revenue |
6.3 | % | ||||||
% change cash revenue |
4.6 | % |
Economic Gain is calculated by the Company as the gain on sale in accordance with GAAP,
less accumulated depreciation through the date of sale and any other non-cash adjustments that may
be required under GAAP accounting. Management generally considers Economic Gain to be an
appropriate supplemental measure to gain on
sale in accordance with GAAP because it helps investors to understand the relationship between the
cash proceeds from a sale and the cash invested in the sold community. The Economic Gain for each
of the communities presented is estimated based on their respective final settlement statements. A
reconciliation of Economic Gain to gain on sale in accordance with GAAP for both the six months
ended June 30, 2007 as well as prior years activities is presented on Attachment 13.
Interest Coverage is calculated by the Company as EBITDA from continuing operations,
excluding land gains, divided by the sum of interest expense, net, and preferred dividends.
Interest Coverage is presented by the Company because it provides rating agencies and investors an
additional means of comparing our ability to service debt obligations to that of other companies.
EBITDA is defined by the Company as net income before interest income and expense, income taxes,
depreciation and amortization.
Attachment 14 (continued)
A reconciliation of EBITDA and a calculation of Interest Coverage for the second quarter of 2007
are as follows (dollars in thousands):
Net income |
$ | 51,052 | ||
Interest expense, net |
22,662 | |||
Interest expense (discontinued operations) |
158 | |||
Depreciation expense |
44,195 | |||
Depreciation expense (discontinued operations) |
177 | |||
EBITDA |
$ | 118,244 | ||
EBITDA from continuing operations |
$ | 117,370 | ||
EBITDA from discontinued operations |
874 | |||
EBITDA |
$ | 118,244 | ||
EBITDA from continuing operations |
$ | 117,370 | ||
Land gains |
| |||
EBITDA from continuing operations, excluding land
gains |
$ | 117,370 | ||
Interest expense, net |
22,662 | |||
Dividends attributable to preferred stock |
2,175 | |||
Interest charges |
24,837 | |||
Interest coverage |
4.7 | |||
Total Capital Cost includes all capitalized costs projected to be or actually incurred
to develop the respective Development or Redevelopment Community, or Development Right, including
land acquisition costs, construction costs, real estate taxes, capitalized interest and loan fees,
permits, professional fees, allocated development overhead and other regulatory fees, all as
determined in accordance with GAAP. For Redevelopment Communities, Total Capital Cost excludes
costs incurred prior to the start of redevelopment when indicated. With respect to communities
where development or redevelopment was completed in a prior or the current period, Total Capital
Cost reflects the actual cost incurred, plus any contingency estimate made by management. Total
Capital Cost for communities identified as having joint venture ownership, either during
construction or upon construction completion, represents the total projected joint venture
contribution amount. For joint ventures not in construction, Total Capital Cost is equal to gross
real estate cost.
Initial Year Market Cap Rate is defined by the Company as Projected NOI of a single
community for the first 12 months of operations (assuming no repositioning), less estimates for
non-routine allowance of approximately $200 $300 per apartment home, divided by the gross sales
price for the community. Projected NOI, as referred to above, represents managements estimate of
projected rental revenue minus projected operating expenses before interest, income taxes (if any),
depreciation, amortization and extraordinary items. For this purpose, managements projection of
operating expenses for the community includes a management fee of 3.0% 3.5%. The Initial Year
Market Cap Rate, which may be determined in a different manner by others, is a measure frequently
used in the real estate industry when determining the appropriate purchase price for a property or
estimating the value for a property. Buyers may assign different Initial Year Market Cap Rates to
different communities when determining the appropriate
value because they (i) may project different rates of change in operating expenses and capital
expenditure estimates and (ii) may project different rates of change in future rental revenue due
to different estimates for changes in rent and occupancy levels. The weighted average Initial Year
Market Cap Rate is weighted based on the gross sales price of each community.
Unleveraged IRR on sold communities refers to the internal rate of return calculated by the
Company considering the timing and amounts of (i) total revenue during the period owned by the
Company and (ii) the gross sales price net of selling costs, offset by (iii) the undepreciated
capital cost of the communities at the time of sale and (iv) total direct operating expenses during
the period owned by the Company. Each of the items (i), (ii), (iii) and (iv) are calculated in
accordance with GAAP.
The calculation of Unleveraged IRR does not include an adjustment for the Companys general and
administrative expense, interest expense, or corporate-level property management and other indirect
operating expenses.
Attachment 14 (continued)
Therefore, Unleveraged IRR is not a substitute for net income as a measure of
our performance. Management believes that the Unleveraged IRR achieved during the period a
community is owned by the Company is useful because it is one indication of the gross value created
by the Companys acquisition, development or redevelopment, management and sale of a community,
before the impact of indirect expenses and Company overhead. The Unleveraged IRR achieved on the
communities as cited in this release should not be viewed as an indication of the gross value
created with respect to other communities owned by the Company, and the Company does not represent
that it will achieve similar Unleveraged IRRs upon the disposition of other communities. The
weighted average Unleveraged IRR for sold communities is weighted based on all cash flows over the
holding period for each respective community, including net sales proceeds.
Leverage is calculated by the Company as total debt as a percentage of Total Market
Capitalization. Total Market Capitalization represents the aggregate of the market value of the
Companys common stock, the market value of the Companys operating partnership units outstanding
(based on the market value of the Companys common stock), the liquidation preference of the
Companys preferred stock and the outstanding principal balance of the Companys debt. Management
believes that Leverage can be one useful measure of a real estate operating companys long-term
liquidity and balance sheet strength, because it shows an approximate relationship between a
companys total debt and the current total market value of its assets based on the current price at
which the Companys common stock trades. Changes in Leverage also can influence changes in per
share results. A calculation of Leverage as of June 30, 2007 is as follows (dollars in thousands):
Total debt |
$ | 2,917,387 | ||
Common stock |
9,478,813 | |||
Preferred stock |
100,000 | |||
Operating partnership units |
14,946 | |||
Total debt |
2,917,387 | |||
Total market capitalization |
12,511,146 | |||
Debt as % of capitalization |
23.3 | % | ||
Because Leverage changes with fluctuations in the Companys stock price, which occur regularly, the
Companys Leverage may change even when the Companys earnings, interest and debt levels remain
stable. Investors should also note that the net realizable value of the Companys assets in
liquidation is not easily determinable and may differ substantially from the Companys Total Market
Capitalization.
Unencumbered NOI as calculated by the Company represents NOI generated by real estate
assets unencumbered by either outstanding secured debt or land leases (excluding land leases with
purchase options that were put in place for governmental incentives or tax abatements) as a
percentage of total NOI generated by real estate assets. The Company believes that current and
prospective unsecured creditors of the Company view Unencumbered NOI as one indication of the
borrowing capacity of the Company. Therefore, when reviewed together with the Companys Interest
Coverage, EBITDA and cash flow from operations, the Company believes that investors and creditors
view Unencumbered NOI as a useful supplemental measure for determining the financial flexibility of
an entity. A calculation of Unencumbered NOI for the six months ended June 30, 2007 is as follows
(dollars in thousands):
NOI for Established Communities |
$ | 219,736 | ||
NOI for Other Stabilized Communities |
18,247 | |||
NOI for Development/Redevelopment Communities |
25,847 | |||
NOI for discontinued operations |
1,693 | |||
Total NOI generated by real estate assets |
265,523 | |||
NOI on encumbered assets |
43,964 | |||
NOI on unencumbered assets |
221,559 | |||
Unencumbered NOI |
83.4 | % | ||
Established Communities are identified by the Company as communities where a comparison
of operating results from the prior year to the current year is meaningful, as these communities
were owned and had Stabilized Operations, as defined below, as of the beginning of the prior year.
Therefore, for 2007, Established Communities are consolidated communities that have Stabilized
Operations as of January 1, 2006 and are not conducting or planning to conduct substantial
redevelopment activities within the current year. Established Communities do not include
communities that are currently held for sale or planned for disposition during the current year.
Attachment 14 (continued)
Development Communities are communities that are under construction and for which a final
certificate of occupancy has not been received. These communities may be partially complete and
operating.
Redevelopment Communities are communities where substantial redevelopment is in progress or
is planned to begin during the current year. For wholly-owned communities, redevelopment is
considered substantial when capital invested during the reconstruction effort is expected to exceed
the lesser of $5,000,000 or 10% of the communitys acquisition cost. The definition of substantial
redevelopment may differ for communities that are not wholly-owned.
Average Rental Rates are calculated by the Company as rental revenue in accordance with
GAAP, divided by the weighted average number of occupied apartment homes.
Economic Occupancy is defined as total possible revenue less vacancy loss as a percentage
of total possible revenue. Total possible revenue is determined by valuing occupied units at
contract rates and vacant units at Market Rents. Vacancy loss is determined by valuing vacant
units at current Market Rents. By measuring vacant apartments at their Market Rents, Economic
Occupancy takes into account the fact that apartment homes of different sizes and locations within
a community have different economic impacts on a communitys gross revenue.
Market Rents as reported by the Company are based on the current market rates set by the
managers of the Companys communities based on their experience in renting their communities
apartments and publicly available market data. Trends in market rents for a region as reported by
others could vary. Market Rents for a period are based on the average Market Rents during that
period and do not reflect any impact for cash concessions.
Non-Revenue Generating Capex represents capital expenditures that will not directly result
in revenue earnings or expense savings.
Stabilized/Restabilized Operations is defined as the earlier of (i) attainment of 95%
physical occupancy or (ii) the one-year anniversary of completion of development or redevelopment.
Average Rent per Home, as calculated for certain Development and Redevelopment Communities
in lease-up, reflects (i) actual average leased rents for those apartments leased through the end
of the quarter net of estimated stabilized concessions, (ii) estimated market rents net of
comparable concessions for all unleased apartments and (iii) includes actual and estimated other
rental revenue. For Development and Redevelopment Communities not yet in lease-up, Average Rent
per Home reflects managements projected rents.
Development Rights are development opportunities in the early phase of the development
process for which the Company either has an option to acquire land or enter into a leasehold
interest, for which the Company is the buyer under a long-term conditional contract to purchase
land or where the Company owns land to develop a new community. The Company capitalizes related
predevelopment costs incurred in pursuit of new developments for which future development is
probable.