EX-99.2
Published on July 26, 2012
Exhibit 99.2
For Immediate News Release
July 25, 2012
AVALONBAY COMMUNITIES, INC. ANNOUNCES
SECOND QUARTER 2012 OPERATING RESULTS
AND UPDATES FULL YEAR 2012 FINANCIAL OUTLOOK
(Arlington, VA) AvalonBay Communities, Inc. (NYSE: AVB) (the Company) reported today that Net Income Attributable to Common Stockholders (Net Income) for the quarter ended June 30, 2012 was $156,909,000. This resulted in Earnings per Share diluted (EPS) of $1.63 for the quarter ended June 30, 2012, compared to EPS of $0.49 for the comparable period of 2011, an increase of 232.7%. For the six months ended June 30, 2012, EPS was $2.24 compared to $0.84 for the comparable period of 2011, an increase of 166.7%.
The increase in EPS for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2012 over the respective prior year periods is due primarily to an increase in real estate sales and related gains in 2012 as well as increased Net Operating Income (NOI) from existing and newly developed and acquired communities and a decline in net interest expense.
Funds from Operations attributable to common stockholders - diluted (FFO) per share for the quarter ended June 30, 2012 increased 18.6% to $1.34 from $1.13 for the comparable period of 2011. FFO per share for the six months ended June 30, 2012 increased 18.1% to $2.61 from $2.21 for the comparable period of 2011. Adjusting for the non-routine items detailed in Attachment 14, FFO per share would have increased by 17.5% and 20.5% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, respectively over the prior year periods.
The Companys FFO per share for the second quarter of 2012 exceeded the midpoint of the range for its second quarter 2012 by $0.02 per share due to savings in operating expenses. Approximately half of the year to date savings in operating expenses are timing related and are expected to be incurred in the second half of 2012.
The Company revised its full year 2012 outlook from the full year 2012 outlook provided in February 2012. The Company now expects FOI per share to be within a range of $5.39 to $5.53, with a midpoint of $5.46. The components of the revised outlook are detailed in the following table.
|
|
|
| |||
July 2012 Full-Year 2012 Outlook | ||||||
Comparison to February 2012 Full-Year 2012 Outlook | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
Per Share |
| |||
|
|
|
| |||
Projected FFO per share 2012 - February 2012 Outlook $5.25 to $5.55 (1) |
|
$ 5.40 |
| |||
|
|
|
| |||
Community operations |
|
0.08 |
| |||
|
|
|
| |||
Investment activity (2) |
|
(0.03) |
| |||
|
|
|
| |||
Financing activity (2) |
|
0.01 |
| |||
|
|
|
| |||
Projected FFO per share 2012 - July 2012 Outlook $5.39 to $5.55 (1) |
|
$ 5.46 |
| |||
(1) Represents the midpoint of the Companys outlook. | |||
(2) Details of the changes in outlook can be found in this earnings release under the section titled Third Quarter and Updated Full Year 2012 Outlook.
| |||
|
|
|
|
Commenting on the Companys results, Tim Naughton, CEO and President, said, These results demonstrate the continued strength in apartment fundamentals and the benefit of our development platform. We increased the midpoint of our full year 2012 outlook by six cents per share and now expect per share FFO growth of nearly 20% for the year.
Operating Results for the Quarter Ended June 30, 2012 Compared to the Prior Year Period
For the Company, including discontinued operations, total revenue increased by $17,011,000, or 6.9% to $261,870,000. For Established Communities, rental revenue increased 5.8%, attributable to an increase in Average Rental Rates of 6.2% offset by a decrease in Economic Occupancy of 0.4%. As a result, total revenue for Established Communities increased $10,442,000 to $190,279,000. Operating expenses for Established Communities increased $1,667,000, or 3.0%, to $57,748,000. Accordingly, NOI for Established Communities increased by 7.1%, or $8,775,000, to $132,531,000.
The following table reflects the percentage changes in rental revenue, operating expenses and NOI for Established Communities for the second quarter of 2012 compared to the second quarter of 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q2 2012 Compared to Q2 2011 |
|
|
Rental |
|
|
Operating |
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
| ||
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
Expenses |
|
|
|
NOI |
|
|
|
NOI (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
New England |
|
4.4% |
|
|
2.1% |
|
|
5.7% |
|
|
19.2% |
|
| ||
Metro NY/NJ |
|
5.5% |
|
|
3.8% |
|
|
6.3% |
|
|
29.9% |
|
| ||
Mid-Atlantic |
|
3.6% |
|
|
6.8% |
|
|
2.4% |
|
|
13.8% |
|
| ||
Pacific NW |
|
8.8% |
|
|
7.2% |
|
|
9.5% |
|
|
3.5% |
|
| ||
No. California |
|
10.2% |
|
|
3.9% |
|
|
12.8% |
|
|
19.6% |
|
| ||
So. California |
|
4.8% |
|
|
(2.7% |
) |
|
8.5% |
|
|
14.0% |
|
| ||
Total |
|
5.8% |
|
|
3.0% |
|
|
7.1% |
|
|
100.0% |
|
| ||
(1) Total represents each regions % of total NOI from the Company, including discontinued operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copyright Ó 2012 AvalonBay Communities, Inc. All Rights Reserved |
Operating Results for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2012 Compared to the Prior Year Period
For the Company, including discontinued operations, total revenue increased by $35,690,000, or 7.4% to $516,357,000. For Established Communities, rental revenue increased 6.2%, attributable to an increase in Average Rental Rates while maintaining Economic Occupancy at 96.0%. Total revenue for Established Communities increased $21,979,000 to $377,648,000. Operating expenses for Established Communities increased $920,000, or 0.8%, to $114,735,000. Accordingly, NOI for Established Communities increased by 8.7%, or $21,059,000, to $262,913,000.
The following table reflects the percentage changes in rental revenue, operating expenses and NOI for Established Communities for the six months ended June 30, 2012 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
YTD 2012 Compared to YTD 2011 |
|
|
Rental |
|
|
Operating |
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
| ||
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
Expenses |
|
|
|
NOI |
|
|
|
NOI (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
New England |
|
4.9% |
|
|
0.8% |
|
|
7.2% |
|
|
19.1% |
|
| ||
Metro NY/NJ |
|
5.9% |
|
|
1.4% |
|
|
8.0% |
|
|
29.6% |
|
| ||
Mid-Atlantic |
|
4.5% |
|
|
4.7% |
|
|
4.4% |
|
|
14.1% |
|
| ||
Pacific NW |
|
8.7% |
|
|
4.2% |
|
|
10.7% |
|
|
3.4% |
|
| ||
No. California |
|
10.2% |
|
|
1.0% |
|
|
14.1% |
|
|
19.5% |
|
| ||
So. California |
|
5.1% |
|
|
(5.0% |
) |
|
10.2% |
|
|
14.3% |
|
| ||
Total |
|
6.2% |
|
|
0.8% |
|
|
8.7% |
|
|
100.0% |
|
| ||
(1) Total represents each regions % of total NOI from the Company, including discontinued operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Development Activity
During the second quarter of 2012, the Company started the construction of four communities: Avalon/AVA Assembly Row, located in Somerville, MA, Avalon East Norwalk, located in Norwalk, CT, AVA University District, located in Seattle, WA and Avalon Dublin Station II, located in Dublin, CA. These four communities will contain 1,226 apartment homes when completed, and will be developed for an estimated Total Capital Cost of $308,700,000.
During the second quarter of 2012, the Company completed four communities: AVA Queen Anne, located in Seattle, WA, Avalon Cohasset, located in Cohasset, MA, Avalon Andover, located in Andover, MA, and Avalon Rockville Centre, located in Rockville Centre, NY. These four communities contain 887 apartment homes and were constructed for an aggregate Total Capital Cost of $245,900,000.
During the second quarter of 2012 the Company acquired two land parcels for an aggregate purchase price of $24,589,000. In July 2012, the Company acquired two additional land parcels for an aggregate purchase price of $21,224,000. The Company
anticipates starting construction in 2012 and 2013 on these four land parcels.
Redevelopment Activity
During the second quarter of 2012, the Company commenced the redevelopment of Eaves Fairfax, located in Fairfax, VA. Eaves Fairfax contains 141 apartment homes and will be redeveloped for an estimated Total Capital Cost of $4,900,000, excluding costs incurred prior to redevelopment.
Disposition Activity
During the second quarter of 2012, the Company sold two communities: Waterford, located in Oakland, CA and Arlington Heights, located in Chicago, IL. Waterford, containing 544 apartment homes, was sold for $86,500,000 and Arlington Heights, containing 409 apartment homes, was sold for $87,250,000. The dispositions resulted in an aggregate gain in accordance with GAAP of $95,049,000 and an Economic Gain of $66,265,000. The Weighted Average Initial Year Market Cap rate for these two communities was 5.3% and the Unleveraged IRR over the 14.9 year holding period was 11.1%.
In conjunction with the disposition of Waterford, the Company repaid the outstanding $33,100,000 variable rate note secured by the community in advance of its June 2014 scheduled maturity. The Company incurred charges of $602,000 for a prepayment penalty and the write off of deferred finance costs as part of this transaction. These charges were included in the Companys financial outlook for the second quarter 2012, provided in April 2012.
During the second quarter of 2012, AvalonBay Value Added Fund, L.P. (Fund I), a private discretionary real estate investment vehicle in which the Company holds an equity interest of approximately 15%, sold Avalon Lombard, located in Chicago, IL. Avalon Lombard, containing 256 apartment homes, was sold for $35,450,000. The Companys proportionate share of the gain in accordance with GAAP for this disposition was $385,000.
The dispositions transacted in the second quarter of 2012 complete the Companys exit of the Chicago market.
Acquisition Activity
During the second quarter of 2012, the Company acquired Eaves Cerritos, located in Artesia, CA. Eaves Cerritos contains 151 apartment homes and was acquired for a purchase price of $29,500,000.
|
|
Copyright Ó 2012 AvalonBay Communities, Inc. All Rights Reserved |
Financing, Liquidity and Balance Sheet Statistics
At June 30, 2012, the Company had no amounts outstanding under its $750,000,000 unsecured credit facility.
At June 30, 2012, the Company had $431,954,000 in unrestricted cash and cash in escrow.
Unencumbered NOI as a percentage of total NOI generated by real estate assets for the six months ended June 30, 2012 was 73%. Interest Coverage for the second quarter of 2012 was 4.8 times.
The Company issued additional shares of common stock during the second quarter of 2012 under the Companys second Continuous Equity Program (CEP II), and completed the program in July 2012. A summary of activity for 2012 and the life of the program is provided in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$500 million CEP II | |||||||||
2012 and Total Activity |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
|
Issued |
|
|
Price/Share |
|
|
Proceeds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2Q 2012 |
|
1,119,892 |
|
|
$ 140.14 |
|
|
$ 154,588,000 |
|
|
YTD 2012 (1) |
|
1,435,215 |
|
|
$ 140.41 |
|
|
$ 198,489,000 |
|
|
Total Program |
|
3,925,980 |
|
|
$ 127.36 |
|
|
$ 492,490,000 |
|
|
(1) Includes activity through July 2012.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt Repayment Activity
In May 2012, in addition to the repayment of the secured financing associated with Waterford discussed above, the Company also repaid a variable rate secured mortgage note in the amount of $14,566,000 in accordance with its scheduled maturity date.
Third Quarter and Updated Full Year 2012 Outlook
During the year, the Company may update its financial outlook based in part on actual economic conditions (including job growth and housing market conditions) which may differ from assumptions used in developing the Companys outlook provided at the beginning of the year. Any update to the Companys financial outlook would also rely heavily on portfolio trend analysis.
Property Operations
Rental rates and occupancy through June 2012 are largely in line with the Companys February 2012 outlook and recent trends suggest that total rental revenue will continue to track our original outlook for revenue growth for 2012 provided in February of 2012.
Operating expenses through June 2012 are less than the original February 2012 outlook, partly due to permanent savings from lower utilities due to mild weather and partly due to the timing of expenses incurred. The Company expects a portion of these expense savings related to timing to reverse in the second half of 2012.
As a result, the Company revised its expected ranges for operating results, updating the ranges from the February 2012 outlook as follows:
· |
|
the Company revised the range for its expected increase in Established Communities revenue and now expects revenue growth of between 5.5% and 6.0% and retained the original midpoint of the range at 5.75%; and |
· |
|
the Company revised the range for its Established Communities NOI growth and now expects NOI growth between 7.0% and 8.0%, increasing the midpoint of the range by 0.5% to 7.5%. |
Development
The Company continues to expect the following development activity disclosed in its February 2012 outlook.
· |
|
The Company currently has 20 communities under development and anticipates starting between $1,000,000,000 and $1,200,000,000 of new development during 2012. |
· |
|
During 2012, the Company expects to disburse between $750,000,000 and $850,000,000 related to current and expected Development Communities and expected acquisitions of land for future development. |
· |
|
The Company expects to complete the development of nine communities during 2012 for an aggregate Total Capital Cost of approximately $590,000,000. |
Acquisition & Disposition Activity
The Companys expected outlook for acquisition and disposition activity for its wholly owned portfolio for the full year 2012 is revised such that expected dispositions declined to between $250,000,000 and $350,000,000, and acquisitions are expected to decline to between $250,000,000 and $350,000,000.
Capital Markets
The Company continues to expect to raise a total of $700,000,000 to $900,000,000 of new debt and equity capital during 2012.
EPS and FFO Outlook
For the third quarter of 2012, the Company expects EPS in the range of $1.00 to $1.04. The Company expects EPS for the full year 2012 to be in the range of $5.11 to $5.25.
The Company expects Projected FFO per share in the range of $1.38 to $1.42 for the third quarter of 2012 and Projected FFO per share for the full year 2012 to be in the range of $5.39 to $5.53.
Other Matters
The Company will hold a conference call on July 26, 2012 at 1:00 PM ET to review and answer questions about this release, its second quarter 2012 results, the Attachments (described below) and related matters. To participate on the call, dial 1-877-510-2397 domestically and 1-763-416-6924 internationally.
To hear a replay of the call, which will be available from July 26, 2012 at 3:00 PM ET to August 1, 2012 at 11:59 PM ET, dial 1-800-585-8367 domestically and 1-404-537-3406 internationally, and use Access Code: 97256881. A webcast of the conference call will also be available at http://www.avalonbay.com/earnings, and an on-line playback of the webcast will be available for at least 30 days following the call.
The Company produces earnings release attachments (the Attachments) that provide detailed information regarding operating, development,
|
|
Copyright Ó 2012 AvalonBay Communities, Inc. All Rights Reserved |
redevelopment, disposition and acquisition activity. These Attachments are considered a part of this earnings release and are available in full with this earnings release via the Companys website at http://www.avalonbay.com/earnings. To receive future press releases via e-mail, please submit a request through http://www.avalonbay.com/email.
About AvalonBay Communities, Inc.
As of June 30, 2012, the Company owned or held a direct or indirect ownership interest in 201 apartment communities containing 59,258 apartment homes in nine states and the District of Columbia, of which 20 communities were under construction and 11 communities were under reconstruction. The Company is an equity REIT in the business of developing, redeveloping, acquiring and managing apartment communities in high barrier-to-entry markets of the United States. More information may be found on the Companys website at http://www.avalonbay.com. For additional information, please contact Jason Reilley, Senior Manager of Investor Relations at 1-703-317-4681 or Thomas J. Sargeant, Chief Financial Officer at 1-703-317-4635.
Forward-Looking Statements
This release, including its Attachments, contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. You can identify these forward-looking statements by the Companys use of words such as expects, plans, estimates, anticipates, projects, intends, believes, outlook and similar expressions that do not relate to historical matters. Actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements as a result of risks and uncertainties, which include the following: we may abandon development or redevelopment opportunities for which we have already incurred costs; adverse capital market conditions may affect our access to various sources of capital and/or cost of capital, which may affect our business activities, earnings and common stock price, among other things; changes in local employment conditions, demand for apartment homes, supply of competitive housing products, and
other economic conditions may result in lower than expected occupancy and/or rental rates and adversely affect the profitability of our communities; delays in completing development, redevelopment and/or lease-up may result in increased financing and construction costs and may delay and/or reduce the profitability of a community; debt and/or equity financing for development, redevelopment or acquisitions of communities may not be available or may not be available on favorable terms; we may be unable to obtain, or experience delays in obtaining, necessary governmental permits and authorizations; and increases in costs of materials, labor or other expenses may result in communities that we develop or redevelop failing to achieve expected profitability. Additional discussions of risks and uncertainties appear in the Companys filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 under the heading Risk Factors and under the heading Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Forward-Looking Statements and in subsequent quarterly reports on Form 10-Q. The Company does not undertake a duty to update forward-looking statements, including its expected third quarter and full year 2012 operating results. The Company may, in its discretion, provide information in future public announcements regarding its outlook that may be of interest to the investment community. The format and extent of future outlooks may be different from the format and extent of the information contained in this release.
Definitions and Reconciliations
Non-GAAP financial measures and other capitalized terms, as used in this earnings release, are defined and further explained on Attachment 14, Definitions and Reconciliations of Non-GAAP Financial Measures and Other Terms. Attachment 14 is included in the full earnings release available at the Companys website at http://www.avalonbay.com/earnings.
|
|
Copyright Ó 2012 AvalonBay Communities, Inc. All Rights Reserved |
|
|
|
SECOND QUARTER 2012
Supplemental Operating and Financial Data
Table of Contents
Company Profile |
|
|
Selected Operating and Other Information |
|
Attachment 1 |
Detailed Operating Information |
|
Attachment 2 |
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets |
|
Attachment 3 |
Sequential Operating Information by Business Segment |
|
Attachment 4 |
|
|
|
Market Profile |
|
|
Quarterly Revenue and Occupancy Changes (Established Communities) |
|
Attachment 5 |
Sequential Quarterly Revenue and Occupancy Changes (Established Communities) |
|
Attachment 6 |
Year-to-Date Revenue and Occupancy Changes (Established Communities) |
|
Attachment 7 |
Operating Expenses (Opex) (Established Communities) |
|
Attachment 8 |
|
|
|
Development, Redevelopment, Acquisition and Disposition Profile |
|
|
Development Communities |
|
Attachment 9 |
Redevelopment Communities |
|
Attachment 10 |
Summary of Development and Redevelopment Community Activity |
|
Attachment 11 |
Future Development |
|
Attachment 12 |
Summary of Disposition Activity |
|
Attachment 13 |
|
|
|
Definitions and Reconciliations |
|
|
Definitions and Reconciliations of Non-GAAP Financial Measures and Other Terms |
|
Attachment 14 |
The following is a Safe Harbor Statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The projections and estimates contained in the following attachments are forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties, and actual results may differ materially from those projected in such statements. Risks associated with the Companys development, redevelopment, construction, and lease-up activities, which could impact the forward-looking statements made, are discussed in the paragraph titled Forward-Looking Statements in the release to which these attachments relate. In particular, development opportunities may be abandoned; Total Capital Cost of a community may exceed original estimates, possibly making the community uneconomical and/or affecting projected returns; construction and lease-up may not be completed on schedule, resulting in increased debt service and construction costs; and other risks described in the Companys filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 and the Companys Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for subsequent quarters.
|
|
|
|
Attachment 1
AvalonBay Communities, Inc.
Selected Operating and Other Information
June 30, 2012
(Dollars in thousands except per share data)
(unaudited)
SELECTED OPERATING INFORMATION |
|
|
Q2 |
|
Q2 |
|
|
|
YTD |
|
YTD |
|
|
| ||||
|
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
|
% Change |
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
|
% Change |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Net income attributable to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
common stockholders |
|
$ |
156,909 |
|
$ |
43,373 |
|
261.8% |
|
$ |
214,667 |
|
$ |
73,713 |
|
191.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Per common share - basic |
|
$ |
1.64 |
|
$ |
0.50 |
|
228.0% |
|
$ |
2.25 |
|
$ |
0.85 |
|
164.7% |
|
Per common share - diluted |
|
$ |
1.63 |
|
$ |
0.49 |
|
232.7% |
|
$ |
2.24 |
|
$ |
0.84 |
|
166.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Funds from Operations |
|
$ |
128,193 |
|
$ |
99,945 |
|
28.3% |
|
$ |
250,164 |
|
$ |
193,485 |
|
29.3% |
|
Per common share - diluted |
|
$ |
1.34 |
|
$ |
1.13 |
|
18.6% |
|
$ |
2.61 |
|
$ |
2.21 |
|
18.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Dividends declared - common |
|
$ |
93,689 |
|
$ |
79,146 |
|
18.4% |
|
$ |
186,170 |
|
$ |
157,075 |
|
18.5% |
|
Per common share |
|
$ |
0.9700 |
|
$ |
0.8925 |
|
8.7% |
|
$ |
1.9400 |
|
$ |
1.7850 |
|
8.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Common shares outstanding |
|
96,586,916 |
|
88,678,968 |
|
8.9% |
|
96,586,916 |
|
88,678,968 |
|
8.9% |
| ||||
Outstanding operating partnership |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
units |
|
7,500 |
|
7,707 |
|
(2.7%) |
|
7,500 |
|
7,707 |
|
(2.7%) |
| ||||
Total outstanding shares and units |
|
96,594,416 |
|
88,686,675 |
|
8.9% |
|
96,594,416 |
|
88,686,675 |
|
8.9% |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Average shares and participating |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
securities outstanding - basic |
|
95,641,333 |
|
87,566,877 |
|
9.2% |
|
95,457,916 |
|
86,989,628 |
|
9.7% |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Weighted shares - basic |
|
95,308,163 |
|
87,317,602 |
|
9.2% |
|
95,082,172 |
|
86,746,992 |
|
9.6% |
| ||||
Average operating partnership units |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
outstanding |
|
7,500 |
|
7,707 |
|
(2.7%) |
|
7,500 |
|
8,992 |
|
(16.6%) |
| ||||
Effect of dilutive securities |
|
677,162 |
|
871,129 |
|
(22.3%) |
|
730,531 |
|
841,997 |
|
(13.2%) |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Average shares outstanding - diluted |
|
95,992,825 |
|
88,196,438 |
|
8.8 % |
|
95,820,203 |
|
87,597,981 |
|
9.4% |
|
DEBT COMPOSITION AND MATURITIES |
|
CAPITALIZED COSTS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Rev | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
Remaining |
|
|
Cap |
|
Cap |
|
Capex | ||||||||
Debt Composition (1) |
|
Amount |
|
Rate (2) |
|
Maturities (1) |
|
|
Interest |
|
Overhead |
|
per Home | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Conventional Debt |
|
|
|
|
|
2012 |
|
$ |
208,567 |
|
Q212 |
$12,625 |
|
$6,682 |
|
$92 | |||||
Long-term, fixed rate |
|
$ |
2,803,445 |
|
|
|
2013 |
|
$ |
336,849 |
|
Q112 |
$12,320 |
|
$6,627 |
|
$52 | ||||
Long-term, variable rate |
|
9,000 |
|
|
|
2014 |
|
$ |
164,284 |
|
Q411 |
$10,901 |
|
$6,165 |
|
$211 | |||||
Variable rate facilities (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
2015 |
|
$ |
418,189 |
|
Q311 |
$8,946 |
|
$5,893 |
|
$181 | |||||
Subtotal, Conventional |
|
2,812,445 |
|
5.6% |
|
2016 |
|
$ |
262,807 |
|
Q211 |
$7,673 |
|
$6,058 |
|
$128 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Tax-Exempt Debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMMUNITY INFORMATION | |||||||||||
Long-term, fixed rate |
|
182,193 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Long-term, variable rate |
|
367,935 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Subtotal, Tax-Exempt |
|
550,128 |
|
3.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apartment | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Communities |
|
Homes | |||||||
Total Debt |
|
$ |
3,362,573 |
|
5.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
Current Communities |
|
181 |
|
53,144 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Development Communities |
|
20 |
|
6,114 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Development Rights |
|
33 |
|
9,036 | ||||||
(1) Excludes debt associated with assets classified as held for sale.
(2) Includes costs of financing such as credit enhancement fees, trustees fees, etc.
(3) Represents the Companys $750 million unsecured credit facility, under which no amounts were drawn at June 30, 2012.
|
|
|
|
Attachment 2
AvalonBay Communities, Inc.
Detailed Operating Information
June 30, 2012
(Dollars in thousands except per share data)
(unaudited)
|
|
Q2 |
|
Q2 |
|
|
|
YTD |
|
YTD |
|
|
| ||||
|
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
|
% Change |
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
|
% Change |
| ||||
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Rental and other income |
|
$ |
256,035 |
|
$ |
233,249 |
|
9.8% |
|
$ |
504,052 |
|
$ |
457,652 |
|
10.1% |
|
Management, development and other fees |
|
2,770 |
|
2,332 |
|
18.8% |
|
5,319 |
|
4,652 |
|
14.3% |
| ||||
Total |
|
258,805 |
|
235,581 |
|
9.9% |
|
509,371 |
|
462,304 |
|
10.2% |
| ||||
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Direct property operating expenses, excluding property taxes |
|
55,172 |
|
51,216 |
|
7.7% |
|
108,403 |
|
103,348 |
|
4.9% |
| ||||
Property taxes |
|
25,182 |
|
23,266 |
|
8.2% |
|
49,457 |
|
47,167 |
|
4.9% |
| ||||
Property management and other indirect operating expenses |
|
11,400 |
|
10,041 |
|
13.5% |
|
21,982 |
|
19,391 |
|
13.4% |
| ||||
Total operating expenses |
|
91,754 |
|
84,523 |
|
8.6% |
|
179,842 |
|
169,906 |
|
5.8% |
| ||||
Interest expense, net |
|
(33,193) |
|
(44,544) |
|
(25.5%) |
|
(66,819) |
|
(87,515) |
|
(23.6%) |
| ||||
Loss on extinguishment of debt, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,179) |
|
|
|
(100.0%) |
| ||||
General and administrative expense |
|
(8,316) |
|
(8,145) |
|
2.1% |
|
(18,026) |
|
(15,437) |
|
16.8% |
| ||||
Joint venture income (1) |
|
2,073 |
|
395 |
|
424.8% |
|
4,248 |
|
898 |
|
373.1% |
| ||||
Investments and investment management expense |
|
(1,499) |
|
(1,341) |
|
11.8% |
|
(2,945) |
|
(2,532) |
|
16.3% |
| ||||
Expensed acquisition, development and other pursuit costs |
|
(901) |
|
(1,353) |
|
(33.4%) |
|
(1,141) |
|
(2,003) |
|
(43.0%) |
| ||||
Depreciation expense |
|
(64,875) |
|
(60,836) |
|
6.6% |
|
(127,436) |
|
(120,059) |
|
6.1% |
| ||||
Gain on sale of land |
|
280 |
|
|
|
100.0% |
|
280 |
|
|
|
100.0% |
| ||||
Income from continuing operations |
|
60,620 |
|
35,234 |
|
72.0% |
|
116,511 |
|
65,750 |
|
77.2% |
| ||||
Discontinued operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Income from discontinued operations (2) |
|
1,152 |
|
283 |
|
307.1% |
|
2,870 |
|
303 |
|
847.2% |
| ||||
Gain on sale of real estate |
|
95,049 |
|
7,675 |
|
1,138.4% |
|
95,049 |
|
7,675 |
|
1,138.4% |
| ||||
Total discontinued operations |
|
96,201 |
|
7,958 |
|
1,108.9% |
|
97,919 |
|
7,978 |
|
1,127.4% |
| ||||
Net income |
|
156,821 |
|
43,192 |
|
263.1% |
|
214,430 |
|
73,728 |
|
190.8% |
| ||||
Net (income) loss attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interests |
|
88 |
|
181 |
|
(51.4%) |
|
237 |
|
(15) |
|
(1,680.0%) |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Net income attributable to common stockholders |
|
$ |
156,909 |
|
$ |
43,373 |
|
261.8% |
|
$ |
214,667 |
|
$ |
73,713 |
|
191.2% |
|
Net income attributable to common stockholders per common share - basic |
|
$ |
1.64 |
|
$ |
0.50 |
|
228.0% |
|
$ |
2.25 |
|
$ |
0.85 |
|
164.7% |
|
Net income attributable to common stockholders per common share - diluted |
|
$ |
1.63 |
|
$ |
0.49 |
|
232.7% |
|
$ |
2.24 |
|
$ |
0.84 |
|
166.7% |
|
(1) Amount for the three months ended June 30, 2012 includes a gain of $385 related to the sale of an unconsolidated community. Amount for the six months ended June 30, 2012 includes a gain of $1,471 related to the sale of three unconsolidated communities.
(2) Reflects net income or loss for investments in real estate classified as discontinued operations as of June 30, 2012 and investments in real estate sold during the period from January 1, 2011 through June 30, 2012. The following table details income from discontinued operations for the periods shown:
|
|
Q2 |
|
|
Q2 |
|
|
YTD |
|
|
YTD |
|
| ||||
|
|
2012 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2012 |
|
|
2011 |
|
| ||||
Rental income |
|
$ |
3,065 |
|
|
$ |
9,278 |
|
|
$ |
6,986 |
|
|
$ |
18,363 |
|
|
Operating and other expenses |
|
(1,114 |
) |
|
(5,600 |
) |
|
(2,486 |
) |
|
(11,289 |
) |
| ||||
Interest expense, net |
|
(53 |
) |
|
(1,311 |
) |
|
(133 |
) |
|
(2,611 |
) |
| ||||
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
|
(602 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(602 |
) |
|
|
|
| ||||
Depreciation expense |
|
(144 |
) |
|
(2,084 |
) |
|
(895 |
) |
|
(4,160 |
) |
| ||||
Income from discontinued operations |
|
$ |
1,152 |
|
|
$ |
283 |
|
|
$ |
2,870 |
|
|
$ |
303 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attachment 3
AvalonBay Communities, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Dollars in thousands)
(unaudited)
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
| ||
|
|
2012 |
|
|
2011 |
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Real estate |
|
$ |
8,577,994 |
|
|
$ |
8,243,720 |
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation |
|
(1,947,431 |
) |
|
(1,820,381 |
) |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net operating real estate |
|
6,630,563 |
|
|
6,423,339 |
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Construction in progress, including land |
|
681,493 |
|
|
597,346 |
|
| ||
Land held for development |
|
294,116 |
|
|
325,918 |
|
| ||
Operating real estate assets held for sale, net |
|
-- |
|
|
78,427 |
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Total real estate, net |
|
7,606,172 |
|
|
7,425,030 |
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
358,263 |
|
|
616,853 |
|
| ||
Cash in escrow |
|
73,691 |
|
|
73,400 |
|
| ||
Resident security deposits |
|
25,468 |
|
|
23,597 |
|
| ||
Other assets |
|
348,451 |
|
|
343,510 |
|
| ||
Total assets |
|
$ |
8,412,045 |
|
|
$ |
8,482,390 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Unsecured notes, net |
|
$ |
1,450,048 |
|
|
$ |
1,629,210 |
|
|
Unsecured facilities |
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
| ||
Notes payable |
|
1,912,316 |
|
|
1,969,986 |
|
| ||
Resident security deposits |
|
39,702 |
|
|
36,620 |
|
| ||
Liabilities related to assets held for sale |
|
-- |
|
|
35,467 |
|
| ||
Other liabilities |
|
420,423 |
|
|
402,152 |
|
| ||
Total liabilities |
|
$ |
3,822,489 |
|
|
$ |
4,073,435 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Redeemable noncontrolling interests |
|
7,316 |
|
|
7,063 |
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Equity |
|
4,582,240 |
|
|
4,401,892 |
|
| ||
Total liabilities and equity |
|
$ |
8,412,045 |
|
|
$ |
8,482,390 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attachment 4
AvalonBay Communities, Inc.
Sequential Operating Information by Business Segment (1)
June 30, 2012
(Dollars in thousands)
(unaudited)
|
|
Total |
|
Quarter Ended |
|
Quarter Ended |
|
Quarter Ended |
| ||||
|
|
Homes |
|
June 30, 2012 |
|
March 31, 2012 |
|
December 31, 2011 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
RENTAL REVENUE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Established (2) |
|
31,734 |
|
$ |
190,196 |
|
$ |
187,308 |
|
$ |
186,051 |
| |
Other Stabilized (2) (3) |
|
7,559 |
|
35,455 |
|
34,485 |
|
33,759 |
| ||||
Redevelopment (2) |
|
3,937 |
|
22,820 |
|
22,372 |
|
22,254 |
| ||||
Development (2) |
|
7,001 |
|
6,690 |
|
3,458 |
|
2,199 |
| ||||
Total Consolidated Communities |
|
50,231 |
|
$ |
255,161 |
|
$ |
247,623 |
|
$ |
244,263 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
OPERATING EXPENSE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Established |
|
|
|
$ |
57,748 |
|
$ |
56,987 |
|
$ |
56,707 |
| |
Other Stabilized |
|
|
|
12,936 |
|
12,083 |
|
13,050 |
| ||||
Redevelopment |
|
|
|
6,732 |
|
6,561 |
|
6,271 |
| ||||
Development |
|
|
|
2,937 |
|
1,876 |
|
1,068 |
| ||||
Total Consolidated Communities |
|
|
|
$ |
80,353 |
|
$ |
77,507 |
|
$ |
77,096 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
NOI (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Established |
|
|
|
$ |
132,531 |
|
$ |
130,382 |
|
$ |
129,405 |
| |
Other Stabilized |
|
|
|
23,244 |
|
22,705 |
|
21,344 |
| ||||
Redevelopment |
|
|
|
16,136 |
|
15,843 |
|
16,015 |
| ||||
Development |
|
|
|
3,757 |
|
1,584 |
|
1,134 |
| ||||
Total Consolidated Communities |
|
|
|
$ |
175,668 |
|
$ |
170,514 |
|
$ |
167,898 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
AVERAGE REVENUE PER OCCUPIED HOME |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Established |
|
|
|
$ |
2,085 |
|
$ |
2,048 |
|
$ |
2,037 |
| |
Other Stabilized |
|
|
|
1,638 |
|
1,607 |
|
1,627 |
| ||||
Redevelopment |
|
|
|
2,046 |
|
2,000 |
|
1,972 |
| ||||
Development (4) |
|
|
|
2,546 |
|
2,399 |
|
2,308 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
ECONOMIC OCCUPANCY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Established |
|
|
|
95.8% |
|
96.1% |
|
95.9% |
| ||||
Other Stabilized |
|
|
|
95.4% |
|
95.6% |
|
94.4% |
| ||||
Redevelopment |
|
|
|
94.4% |
|
94.7% |
|
95.6% |
| ||||
Development (5) |
|
|
|
40.8% |
|
28.7% |
|
26.1% |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
STABILIZED COMMUNITIES TURNOVER |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Current Year Period / Prior Year Period (6) |
|
|
|
56.4% / 55.8% |
|
43.9% / 43.5% |
|
46.0% / 45.4% |
| ||||
(1) Excludes amounts related to communities that have been sold, or that are classified as held for sale.
(2) See Attachment #14 - Definitions and Reconciliations of Non-GAAP Financial Measures and Other Terms.
(3) Results for these communities for quarters prior to January 1, 2012 may reflect community operations prior to stabilization, including periods of lease-up, such that occupancy levels are below what would be considered stabilized.
(4) Average revenue per occupied home for Development Communities includes only those assets with at least one full quarter of lease-up activity.
(5) Economic Occupancy for Development Communities is calculated based on the communities currently generating revenue. For detail of occupancy rates for communities under construction, and communities for which construction has completed, but the community has not yet reached stabilized occupancy, see Attachment #9, Development Communities.
(6) Turnover represents the annualized number of units turned over during the quarter, divided by the total number of apartment homes for communities with stabilized occupancy for the respective reporting period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attachment 5
AvalonBay Communities, Inc.
Quarterly Revenue and Occupancy Changes - Established Communities (1)
June 30, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
Apartment |
|
Average Rental Rates (2) |
|
Economic Occupancy |
|
Rental Revenue ($000s) (3) | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
Q2 12 |
|
Q2 11 |
|
% Change |
|
Q2 12 |
|
Q2 11 |
|
% Change |
|
Q2 12 |
|
Q2 11 |
|
% Change | ||||
New England |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Boston, MA |
|
4,719 |
|
$ |
2,057 |
|
$ |
1,943 |
|
5.9% |
|
95.3% |
|
96.2% |
|
(0.9%) |
|
$ |
27,762 |
|
$ |
26,452 |
|
5.0% |
Fairfield-New Haven, CT |
|
2,347 |
|
2,078 |
|
1,987 |
|
4.6% |
|
95.4% |
|
96.7% |
|
(1.3%) |
|
13,965 |
|
13,521 |
|
3.3% | ||||
New England Average |
|
7,066 |
|
2,064 |
|
1,958 |
|
5.4% |
|
95.3% |
|
96.3% |
|
(1.0%) |
|
41,727 |
|
39,973 |
|
4.4% | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Metro NY/NJ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
New York, NY |
|
4,027 |
|
2,891 |
|
2,692 |
|
7.4% |
|
96.5% |
|
96.6% |
|
(0.1%) |
|
33,698 |
|
31,398 |
|
7.3% | ||||
New Jersey |
|
2,246 |
|
2,045 |
|
1,960 |
|
4.3% |
|
96.0% |
|
96.5% |
|
(0.5%) |
|
13,222 |
|
12,739 |
|
3.8% | ||||
Long Island, NY |
|
1,620 |
|
2,394 |
|
2,332 |
|
2.7% |
|
96.4% |
|
96.7% |
|
(0.3%) |
|
11,221 |
|
10,962 |
|
2.4% | ||||
Metro NY/NJ Average |
|
7,893 |
|
2,548 |
|
2,409 |
|
5.8% |
|
96.3% |
|
96.6% |
|
(0.3%) |
|
58,141 |
|
55,099 |
|
5.5% | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Mid-Atlantic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Washington Metro |
|
4,748 |
|
1,902 |
|
1,835 |
|
3.7% |
|
95.3% |
|
95.4% |
|
(0.1%) |
|
25,825 |
|
24,932 |
|
3.6% | ||||
Mid-Atlantic Average |
|
4,748 |
|
1,902 |
|
1,835 |
|
3.7% |
|
95.3% |
|
95.4% |
|
(0.1%) |
|
25,825 |
|
24,932 |
|
3.6% | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Pacific Northwest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Seattle, WA |
|
1,908 |
|
1,468 |
|
1,363 |
|
7.7% |
|
96.5% |
|
95.4% |
|
1.1% |
|
8,110 |
|
7,453 |
|
8.8% | ||||
Pacific Northwest Average |
|
1,908 |
|
1,468 |
|
1,363 |
|
7.7% |
|
96.5% |
|
95.4% |
|
1.1% |
|
8,110 |
|
7,453 |
|
8.8% | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Northern California |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
San Jose, CA |
|
2,442 |
|
2,154 |
|
1,937 |
|
11.2% |
|
95.9% |
|
96.7% |
|
(0.8%) |
|
15,136 |
|
13,705 |
|
10.4% | ||||
Oakland-East Bay, CA |
|
1,699 |
|
1,719 |
|
1,570 |
|
9.5% |
|
96.3% |
|
97.0% |
|
(0.7%) |
|
8,436 |
|
7,755 |
|
8.8% | ||||
San Francisco, CA |
|
1,079 |
|
2,672 |
|
2,403 |
|
11.2% |
|
96.3% |
|
96.2% |
|
0.1% |
|
8,329 |
|
7,483 |
|
11.3% | ||||
Northern California Average |
|
5,220 |
|
2,120 |
|
1,913 |
|
10.8% |
|
96.1% |
|
96.7% |
|
(0.6%) |
|
31,901 |
|
28,943 |
|
10.2% | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Southern California |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Los Angeles, CA |
|
2,974 |
|
1,794 |
|
1,710 |
|
4.9% |
|
95.7% |
|
95.4% |
|
0.3% |
|
15,318 |
|
14,554 |
|
5.2% | ||||
Orange County, CA |
|
1,000 |
|
1,716 |
|
1,628 |
|
5.4% |
|
95.1% |
|
96.2% |
|
(1.1%) |
|
4,895 |
|
4,694 |
|
4.3% | ||||
San Diego, CA |
|
925 |
|
1,622 |
|
1,567 |
|
3.5% |
|
95.1% |
|
94.9% |
|
0.2% |
|
4,279 |
|
4,127 |
|
3.7% | ||||
Southern California Average |
|
4,899 |
|
1,745 |
|
1,665 |
|
4.8% |
|
95.5% |
|
95.5% |
|
0.0% |
|
24,492 |
|
23,375 |
|
4.8% | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Average/Total Established |
|
31,734 |
|
$ |
2,085 |
|
$ |
1,964 |
|
6.2% |
|
95.8% |
|
96.2% |
|
(0.4%) |
|
$ |
190,196 |
|
$ |
179,775 |
|
5.8% |
(1) Established Communities are communities with stabilized occupancy and operating expenses as of January 1, 2011 such that a comparison of 2011 to 2012 is meaningful.
(2) Reflects the effect of concessions amortized over the average lease term.
(3) With concessions reflected on a cash basis, rental revenue from Established Communities increased 5.4% between years.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attachment 6
AvalonBay Communities, Inc.
*Sequential Quarterly* Revenue and Occupancy Changes - Established Communities
June 30, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
Apartment |
|
Average Rental Rates (1) |
|
Economic Occupancy |
|
Rental Revenue ($000s) | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
Q2 12 |
|
Q1 12 |
|
% Change |
|
Q2 12 |
|
Q1 12 |
|
% Change |
|
Q2 12 |
|
Q1 12 |
|
% Change | ||||
New England |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Boston, MA |
|
4,719 |
|
$ |
2,057 |
|
$ |
2,026 |
|
1.5% |
|
95.3% |
|
95.4% |
|
(0.1%) |
|
$ |
27,762 |
|
$ |
27,368 |
|
1.4% |
Fairfield-New Haven, CT |
|
2,347 |
|
2,078 |
|
2,028 |
|
2.5% |
|
95.4% |
|
96.0% |
|
(0.6%) |
|
13,965 |
|
13,708 |
|
1.9% | ||||
New England Average |
|
7,066 |
|
2,064 |
|
2,026 |
|
1.9% |
|
95.3% |
|
95.6% |
|
(0.3%) |
|
41,727 |
|
41,076 |
|
1.6% | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Metro NY/NJ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
New York, NY |
|
4,027 |
|
2,891 |
|
2,846 |
|
1.6% |
|
96.5% |
|
96.0% |
|
0.5% |
|
33,698 |
|
32,994 |
|
2.1% | ||||
New Jersey |
|
2,246 |
|
2,045 |
|
2,018 |
|
1.3% |
|
96.0% |
|
96.4% |
|
(0.4%) |
|
13,222 |
|
13,101 |
|
0.9% | ||||
Long Island, NY |
|
1,620 |
|
2,394 |
|
2,373 |
|
0.9% |
|
96.4% |
|
96.1% |
|
0.3% |
|
11,221 |
|
11,092 |
|
1.2% | ||||
Metro NY/NJ Average |
|
7,893 |
|
2,548 |
|
2,511 |
|
1.5% |
|
96.3% |
|
96.1% |
|
0.2% |
|
58,141 |
|
57,187 |
|
1.7% | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Mid-Atlantic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Washington Metro |
|
4,748 |
|
1,902 |
|
1,868 |
|
1.8% |
|
95.3% |
|
96.6% |
|
(1.3%) |
|
25,825 |
|
25,691 |
|
0.5% | ||||
Mid-Atlantic Average |
|
4,748 |
|
1,902 |
|
1,868 |
|
1.8% |
|
95.3% |
|
96.6% |
|
(1.3%) |
|
25,825 |
|
25,691 |
|
0.5% | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Pacific Northwest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Seattle, WA |
|
1,908 |
|
1,468 |
|
1,424 |
|
3.1% |
|
96.5% |
|
97.0% |
|
(0.5%) |
|
8,110 |
|
7,902 |
|
2.6% | ||||
Pacific Northwest Average |
|
1,908 |
|
1,468 |
|
1,424 |
|
3.1% |
|
96.5% |
|
97.0% |
|
(0.5%) |
|
8,110 |
|
7,902 |
|
2.6% | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Northern California |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
San Jose, CA |
|
2,442 |
|
2,154 |
|
2,093 |
|
2.9% |
|
95.9% |
|
96.0% |
|
(0.1%) |
|
15,136 |
|
14,725 |
|
2.8% | ||||
Oakland-East Bay, CA |
|
1,699 |
|
1,719 |
|
1,687 |
|
1.9% |
|
96.3% |
|
95.9% |
|
0.4% |
|
8,436 |
|
8,247 |
|
2.3% | ||||
San Francisco, CA |
|
1,079 |
|
2,672 |
|
2,613 |
|
2.3% |
|
96.3% |
|
96.1% |
|
0.2% |
|
8,329 |
|
8,126 |
|
2.5% | ||||
Northern California Average |
|
5,220 |
|
2,120 |
|
2,069 |
|
2.5% |
|
96.1% |
|
96.0% |
|
0.1% |
|
31,901 |
|
31,098 |
|
2.6% | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Southern California |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Los Angeles, CA |
|
2,974 |
|
1,794 |
|
1,774 |
|
1.1% |
|
95.7% |
|
96.3% |
|
(0.6%) |
|
15,318 |
|
15,236 |
|
0.5% | ||||
Orange County, CA |
|
1,000 |
|
1,716 |
|
1,688 |
|
1.7% |
|
95.1% |
|
96.6% |
|
(1.5%) |
|
4,895 |
|
4,883 |
|
0.2% | ||||
San Diego, CA |
|
925 |
|
1,622 |
|
1,598 |
|
1.5% |
|
95.1% |
|
95.6% |
|
(0.5%) |
|
4,279 |
|
4,235 |
|
1.0% | ||||
Southern California Average |
|
4,899 |
|
1,745 |
|
1,722 |
|
1.3% |
|
95.5% |
|
96.2% |
|
(0.7%) |
|
24,492 |
|
24,354 |
|
0.6% | ||||
Average/Total Established |
|
31,734 |
|
$ |
2,085 |
|
$ |
2,048 |
|
1.8% |
|
95.8% |
|
96.1% |
|
(0.3%) |
|
$ |
190,196 |
|
$ |
187,308 |
|
1.5% |
(1) Reflects the effect of concessions amortized over the average lease term.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attachment 7
AvalonBay Communities, Inc.
Year-to-Date Revenue and Occupancy Changes - Established Communities (1)
June 30, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
Apartment |
|
Average Rental Rates (2) |
|
Economic Occupancy |
|
Rental Revenue ($000s) (3) | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
YTD 12 |
|
YTD 11 |
|
% Change |
|
YTD 12 |
|
YTD 11 |
|
% Change |
|
YTD 12 |
|
YTD 11 |
|
% Change | ||||
New England |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Boston, MA |
|
4,719 |
|
$ |
2,043 |
|
$ |
1,925 |
|
6.1% |
|
95.3% |
|
96.0% |
|
(0.7%) |
|
55,130 |
|
52,302 |
|
5.4% | ||
Fairfield-New Haven, CT |
|
2,347 |
|
2,053 |
|
1,962 |
|
4.6% |
|
95.7% |
|
96.5% |
|
(0.8%) |
|
27,673 |
|
26,650 |
|
3.8% | ||||
New England Average |
|
7,066 |
|
2,046 |
|
1,939 |
|
5.5% |
|
95.5% |
|
96.1% |
|
(0.6%) |
|
82,803 |
|
78,952 |
|
4.9% | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Metro NY/NJ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
New York, NY |
|
4,027 |
|
2,869 |
|
2,675 |
|
7.3% |
|
96.2% |
|
96.0% |
|
0.2% |
|
66,692 |
|
62,066 |
|
7.5% | ||||
New Jersey |
|
2,246 |
|
2,030 |
|
1,940 |
|
4.6% |
|
96.2% |
|
96.2% |
|
0.0% |
|
26,323 |
|
25,154 |
|
4.6% | ||||
Long Island, NY |
|
1,620 |
|
2,385 |
|
2,310 |
|
3.2% |
|
96.3% |
|
96.4% |
|
(0.1%) |
|
22,313 |
|
21,632 |
|
3.1% | ||||
Metro NY/NJ Average |
|
7,893 |
|
2,531 |
|
2,392 |
|
5.8% |
|
96.2% |
|
96.1% |
|
0.1% |
|
115,328 |
|
108,852 |
|
5.9% | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Mid-Atlantic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Washington Metro |
|
4,748 |
|
1,884 |
|
1,812 |
|
4.0% |
|
96.0% |
|
95.5% |
|
0.5% |
|
51,516 |
|
49,316 |
|
4.5% | ||||
Mid-Atlantic Average |
|
4,748 |
|
1,884 |
|
1,812 |
|
4.0% |
|
96.0% |
|
95.5% |
|
0.5% |
|
51,516 |
|
49,316 |
|
4.5% | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Pacific Northwest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Seattle, WA |
|
1,908 |
|
1,446 |
|
1,346 |
|
7.4% |
|
96.7% |
|
95.4% |
|
1.3% |
|
16,012 |
|
14,734 |
|
8.7% | ||||
Pacific Northwest Average |
|
1,908 |
|
1,446 |
|
1,346 |
|
7.4% |
|
96.7% |
|
95.4% |
|
1.3% |
|
16,012 |
|
14,734 |
|
8.7% | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Northern California |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
San Jose, CA |
|
2,442 |
|
2,124 |
|
1,911 |
|
11.1% |
|
96.0% |
|
96.7% |
|
(0.7%) |
|
29,861 |
|
27,053 |
|
10.4% | ||||
Oakland-East Bay, CA |
|
1,699 |
|
1,703 |
|
1,554 |
|
9.6% |
|
96.1% |
|
96.8% |
|
(0.7%) |
|
16,683 |
|
15,319 |
|
8.9% | ||||
San Francisco, CA |
|
1,079 |
|
2,643 |
|
2,379 |
|
11.1% |
|
96.2% |
|
95.9% |
|
0.3% |
|
16,455 |
|
14,773 |
|
11.4% | ||||
Northern California Average |
|
5,220 |
|
2,094 |
|
1,893 |
|
10.6% |
|
96.1% |
|
96.5% |
|
(0.4%) |
|
62,999 |
|
57,145 |
|
10.2% | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Southern California |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Los Angeles, CA |
|
2,974 |
|
1,784 |
|
1,696 |
|
5.2% |
|
96.0% |
|
95.8% |
|
0.2% |
|
30,555 |
|
28,981 |
|
5.4% | ||||
Orange County, CA |
|
1,000 |
|
1,701 |
|
1,603 |
|
6.1% |
|
95.8% |
|
96.2% |
|
(0.4%) |
|
9,778 |
|
9,253 |
|
5.7% | ||||
San Diego, CA |
|
925 |
|
1,609 |
|
1,552 |
|
3.7% |
|
95.3% |
|
95.9% |
|
(0.6%) |
|
8,513 |
|
8,258 |
|
3.1% | ||||
Southern California Average |
|
4,899 |
|
1,734 |
|
1,650 |
|
5.1% |
|
95.9% |
|
95.9% |
|
0.0% |
|
48,846 |
|
46,492 |
|
5.1% | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Average/Total Established |
|
31,734 |
|
$ |
2,066 |
|
$ |
1,945 |
|
6.2% |
|
96.0% |
|
96.0% |
|
0.0% |
|
$ |
377,504 |
|
$ |
355,491 |
|
6.2% |
(1) Established Communities are communities with stabilized operating expenses as of January 1, 2011 such that a comparison of 2011 to 2012 is meaningful.
(2) Reflects the effect of concessions amortized over the average lease term.
(3) With concessions reflected on a cash basis, rental revenue from Established Communities increased 5.8% between years.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attachment 8
AvalonBay Communities, Inc.
Operating Expenses (Opex) - Established Communities (1)
June 30, 2012
(Dollars in thousands)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q2 2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
YTD 2012 |
| ||||
|
|
Q2 |
|
Q2 |
|
|
|
% of |
|
YTD |
|
YTD |
|
|
|
% of |
| ||||
|
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
|
% Change |
|
Total Opex |
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
|
% Change |
|
Total Opex |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Property taxes (2) |
|
$ |
18,691 |
|
$ |
18,104 |
|
3.2% |
|
32.4% |
|
$ |
37,032 |
|
$ |
36,072 |
|
2.7% |
|
32.3% |
|
Payroll (3) |
|
13,541 |
|
12,749 |
|
6.2% |
|
23.5% |
|
27,442 |
|
26,273 |
|
4.4% |
|
23.9% |
| ||||
Repairs & maintenance |
|
10,019 |
|
9,757 |
|
2.7% |
|
17.3% |
|
18,966 |
|
18,284 |
|
3.7% |
|
16.5% |
| ||||
Office operations (4) |
|
6,205 |
|
6,731 |
|
(7.8%) |
|
10.7% |
|
12,430 |
|
13,226 |
|
(6.0%) |
|
10.8% |
| ||||
Utilities (5) |
|
5,771 |
|
5,811 |
|
(0.7%) |
|
10.0% |
|
12,433 |
|
13,546 |
|
(8.2%) |
|
10.9% |
| ||||
Marketing |
|
1,668 |
|
1,443 |
|
15.6% |
|
2.9% |
|
3,023 |
|
3,229 |
|
(6.4%) |
|
2.6% |
| ||||
Insurance (6) |
|
1,853 |
|
1,486 |
|
24.7% |
|
3.2% |
|
3,409 |
|
3,185 |
|
7.0% |
|
3.0% |
| ||||
Total Established Communities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Operating Expenses (7) |
|
$ |
57,748 |
|
$ |
56,081 |
|
3.0% |
|
100.0% |
|
$ |
114,735 |
|
$ |
113,815 |
|
0.8% |
|
100.0% |
|
(1) See Attachment #14 - Definitions and Reconciliations of Non-GAAP Financial Measures and Other Terms.
(2) Property taxes increased for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 primarily due to increases in both rates and assessments. The increase for the six months ended June 30, 2012 is offset partially by refunds received in the current year.
(3) Payroll includes expenses directly related to on-site operations. The increases for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 over the prior year periods are due primarily to increased compensation and benefits costs.
(4) Office operations includes administrative costs, land lease expense, bad debt expense and association and license fees. The decreases for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 from the prior year periods are due primarily to a decrease in bad debt expense.
(5) Utilities represents aggregate utility costs, net of resident reimbursements. The decreases for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 from the prior year periods are due primarily to lower electric and gas expense, due to the mild winter experienced across the United States, lower rates from negotiated contracts, benefits realized from the Companys investment in energy efficient infrastructure, and increased receipts from water submetering.
(6) Insurance costs consist of premiums, expected claims activity and associated reductions from receipt of claims proceeds. The increase over the prior year periods are due primarily to an increase in property insurance costs experienced upon renewal of the Companys policy in the second quarter of 2012, and the timing of claims. Insurance costs can exhibit volatility due to the amounts and timing of estimated and actual claim activity and the related proceeds received.
(7) Operating expenses for Established Communities excludes indirect costs for off-site corporate-level property management related expenses, and other support related expenses.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attachment 9
AvalonBay Communities, Inc.
Development Communities as of June 30, 2012
Community Information |
|
Number |
|
Total |
|
Schedule |
|
Avg Rent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
| ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
of |
|
Capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stabilized |
|
Per |
|
% |
|
% |
|
% |
|
Economic |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
Apt |
|
Cost |
|
|
|
Initial |
|
|
|
Operations |
|
Home |
|
Comp |
|
Leased |
|
Occupied |
|
Occ. |
| ||||
|
Development Name |
|
Location |
|
Homes |
|
(millions) (1) |
|
Start |
|
Occupancy |
|
Complete |
|
(1) |
|
(1) |
|
(2) |
|
(3) |
|
(4) |
|
(1) (5) |
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Under Construction: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
1. Avalon Green II |
|
Greenburgh, NY |
|
444 |
|
$ 107.8 |
|
|
Q3 2010 |
|
Q3 2011 |
|
Q4 2012 |
|
Q2 2013 |
|
$ 2,515 |
|
|
74.3% |
|
68.9% |
|
60.8% |
|
40.3% |
| ||
2. Avalon at Wesmont Station I |
|
Wood-Ridge, NJ |
|
266 |
|
62.5 |
|
|
Q4 2010 |
|
Q1 2012 |
|
Q4 2012 |
|
Q2 2013 |
|
1,925 |
|
|
62.0% |
|
60.2% |
|
56.0% |
|
22.5% |
| ||
3. Avalon Ocean Avenue |
|
San Francisco, CA |
|
173 |
|
61.1 |
|
|
Q4 2010 |
|
Q1 2012 |
|
Q4 2012 |
|
Q2 2013 |
|
2,680 |
|
|
72.8% |
|
65.9% |
|
46.2% |
|
19.1% |
| ||
4. Avalon North Bergen |
|
North Bergen, NJ |
|
164 |
|
42.8 |
|
|
Q4 2010 |
|
Q2 2012 |
|
Q3 2012 |
|
Q1 2013 |
|
2,125 |
|
|
79.3% |
|
69.5% |
|
61.0% |
|
20.8% |
| ||
5. Avalon Garden City |
|
Garden City, NY |
|
204 |
|
68.0 |
|
|
Q2 2011 |
|
Q2 2012 |
|
Q4 2012 |
|
Q2 2013 |
|
3,480 |
|
|
19.1% |
|
43.1% |
|
18.1% |
|
7.7% |
| ||
6. Avalon Park Crest |
|
Tysons Corner, VA |
|
354 |
|
77.6 |
|
|
Q4 2010 |
|
Q3 2012 |
|
Q2 2013 |
|
Q4 2013 |
|
1,910 |
|
|
10.5% |
|
18.9% |
|
6.8% |
|
0.0% |
| ||
7. Avalon Exeter |
|
Boston, MA |
|
187 |
|
114.0 |
|
|
Q2 2011 |
|
Q3 2013 |
|
Q1 2014 |
|
Q3 2014 |
|
4,335 |
|
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
| ||
8. Avalon Irvine II |
|
Irvine, CA |
|
179 |
|
46.2 |
|
|
Q3 2011 |
|
Q1 2013 |
|
Q2 2013 |
|
Q4 2013 |
|
1,840 |
|
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
| ||
9. AVA Ballard |
|
Seattle, WA |
|
265 |
|
68.8 |
|
|
Q3 2011 |
|
Q2 2013 |
|
Q3 2013 |
|
Q1 2014 |
|
1,715 |
|
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
| ||
10. Avalon Shelton III |
|
Shelton, CT |
|
251 |
|
47.9 |
|
|
Q3 2011 |
|
Q1 2013 |
|
Q3 2013 |
|
Q1 2014 |
|
1,745 |
|
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
| ||
11. Avalon Hackensack |
|
Hackensack, NJ |
|
226 |
|
47.2 |
|
|
Q3 2011 |
|
Q2 2013 |
|
Q4 2013 |
|
Q2 2014 |
|
2,555 |
|
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
| ||
12. AVA H Street |
|
Washington, D.C. |
|
138 |
|
35.1 |
|
|
Q4 2011 |
|
Q4 2012 |
|
Q2 2013 |
|
Q4 2013 |
|
2,065 |
|
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
| ||
13. Avalon West Chelsea/AVA High Line |
|
New York, NY |
|
715 |
|
276.1 |
|
|
Q4 2011 |
|
Q4 2013 |
|
Q1 2015 |
|
Q3 2015 |
|
3,300 |
|
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
| ||
14. Avalon Natick |
|
Natick, MA |
|
407 |
|
82.9 |
|
|
Q4 2011 |
|
Q2 2013 |
|
Q2 2014 |
|
Q4 2014 |
|
1,805 |
|
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
| ||
15. Avalon Somerset |
|
Somerset, NJ |
|
384 |
|
79.5 |
|
|
Q4 2011 |
|
Q3 2012 |
|
Q4 2013 |
|
Q2 2014 |
|
1,965 |
|
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
| ||
16. Avalon Mosaic |
|
Tysons Corner, VA |
|
531 |
|
120.9 |
|
|
Q1 2012 |
|
Q4 2013 |
|
Q3 2014 |
|
Q1 2015 |
|
1,930 |
|
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
| ||
17. Avalon East Norwalk |
|
Norwalk, CT |
|
240 |
|
45.5 |
|
|
Q2 2012 |
|
Q2 2013 |
|
Q1 2014 |
|
Q3 2014 |
|
1,840 |
|
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
| ||
18. Avalon Dublin Station II |
|
Dublin, CA |
|
255 |
|
73.0 |
|
|
Q2 2012 |
|
Q4 2013 |
|
Q2 2014 |
|
Q4 2014 |
|
2,080 |
|
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
| ||
19. Avalon/AVA Assembly Row |
|
Somerville, MA |
|
448 |
|
113.5 |
|
|
Q2 2012 |
|
Q4 2013 |
|
Q3 2014 |
|
Q1 2015 |
|
2,310 |
|
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
| ||
20. AVA University District |
|
Seattle, WA |
|
283 |
|
76.7 |
|
|
Q2 2012 |
|
Q1 2014 |
|
Q3 2014 |
|
Q1 2015 |
|
1,760 |
|
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Subtotal / Weighted Average |
|
|
|
6,114 |
|
$ 1,647.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 2,305 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Completed this Quarter: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
1. Avalon Rockville Centre |
|
Rockville Centre, NY |
|
349 |
|
$ 109.7 |
|
|
Q1 2010 |
|
Q2 2011 |
|
Q2 2012 |
|
Q4 2012 |
|
$ 2,680 |
|
|
100.0% |
|
91.7% |
|
90.0% |
|
77.4% |
| ||
2. AVA Queen Anne |
|
Seattle, WA |
|
203 |
|
54.6 |
|
|
Q3 2010 |
|
Q4 2011 |
|
Q2 2012 |
|
Q4 2012 |
|
2,115 |
|
|
100.0% |
|
93.6% |
|
91.6% |
|
60.7% |
| ||
3. Avalon Cohasset |
|
Cohasset, MA |
|
220 |
|
55.0 |
|
|
Q4 2010 |
|
Q3 2011 |
|
Q2 2012 |
|
Q4 2012 |
|
1,940 |
|
|
100.0% |
|
92.7% |
|
85.5% |
|
64.3% |
| ||
4. Avalon Andover |
|
Andover, MA |
|
115 |
|
26.6 |
|
|
Q2 2011 |
|
Q2 2012 |
|
Q2 2012 |
|
Q4 2012 |
|
1,880 |
|
|
100.0% |
|
85.2% |
|
77.4% |
|
30.5% |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Subtotal / Weighted Average |
|
|
|
887 |
|
$ 245.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 2,265 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Total / Weighted Average |
|
|
|
7,001 |
|
$ 1,893.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 2,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
Wtd Average Projected NOI as a % of Total Capital Cost (1) |
|
6.9% |
|
|
|
Asset Cost Basis (millions) (6) |
|
|
|
|
Source |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Cost, Under Construction and Completed This Quarter |
|
$ |
1,893.0 |
|
|
Att. 9 |
|
|
Q2 2012 Net Operating Income/(Deficit) for communities under |
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Remaining to Invest, Under Construction and Completed This Quarter |
|
|
(896) |
|
|
Att. 11 |
|
|
construction and completed this quarter was $3.8 million. (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Asset Cost Basis, Under Construction and Completed This Quarter |
|
$ 997 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
See Attachment #14 - Definitions and Reconciliations of Non-GAAP Financial Measures and Other Terms. |
|
|
(2) |
Includes apartment homes for which construction has been completed and accepted by management as of July 20, 2012. |
|
|
(3) |
Includes apartment homes for which leases have been executed or non-refundable deposits have been paid as of July 20, 2012. |
|
|
(4) |
Physical occupancy based on apartment homes occupied as of July 20, 2012. |
|
|
(5) |
Represents Economic Occupancy for the second quarter of 2012. |
|
|
(6) |
There are currently no Non-Stabilized Development Completions from prior quarters. |
|
|
|
This chart contains forward-looking statements. Please see the paragraph regarding forward-looking statements on the Table of Contents page relating to the Companys Supplemental Operating and Financial Data for the second quarter of 2012. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attachment 10
AvalonBay Communities, Inc.
Redevelopment Communities as of June 30, 2012
Community Information |
|
|
|
Total |
|
Schedule |
|
Avg |
|
|
| |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
Capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post-Renovated |
|
Homes |
| |||
|
|
|
|
of Apt |
|
Cost (1)(2) |
|
Acquisition / |
|
|
|
|
|
Restabilized |
|
Rent Per |
|
Completed |
| |||
Community Name |
|
Location |
|
Homes |
|
(millions) |
|
Completion |
|
Start |
|
Complete |
|
Ops (2) |
|
Home (2) |
|
@ 6/30/2012 |
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Under Redevelopment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
1. |
Avalon Sunset Towers |
|
San Francisco, CA |
|
243 |
|
$ 13.1 |
|
|
Q2 1996 |
|
Q4 2010 |
|
Q3 2013 |
|
Q1 2014 |
|
$2,625 |
|
|
97 |
|
2. |
Eaves Foster City |
|
Foster City, CA |
|
288 |
|
7.0 |
|
|
Q1 1994 |
|
Q3 2011 |
|
Q4 2012 |
|
Q2 2013 |
|
2,010 |
|
|
280 |
|
3. |
AVA Ballston |
|
Arlington, VA |
|
344 |
|
13.9 |
|
|
Q4 1993 |
|
Q3 2011 |
|
Q4 2012 |
|
Q2 2013 |
|
2,175 |
|
|
192 |
|
4. |
Eaves Santa Margarita |
|
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA |
|
301 |
|
7.0 |
|
|
Q2 1997 |
|
Q3 2011 |
|
Q3 2012 |
|
Q1 2013 |
|
1,500 |
|
|
301 |
|
5. |
Avalon Wilton I |
|
Wilton, CT |
|
102 |
|
5.6 |
|
|
Q2 1997 |
|
Q4 2011 |
|
Q3 2012 |
|
Q1 2013 |
|
3,425 |
|
|
102 |
|
6. |
Avalon at Lexington |
|
Lexington, MA |
|
198 |
|
7.9 |
|
|
Q3 1994 |
|
Q4 2011 |
|
Q3 2012 |
|
Q1 2013 |
|
2,025 |
|
|
198 |
|
7. |
AVA Newport |
|
Costa Mesa, CA |
|
145 |
|
5.6 |
|
|
Q3 1996 |
|
Q4 2011 |
|
Q3 2012 |
|
Q1 2013 |
|
1,890 |
|
|
108 |
|
8. |
Avalon at Center Place |
|
Providence, RI |
|
225 |
|
6.7 |
|
|
Q2 1997 |
|
Q4 2011 |
|
Q4 2012 |
|
Q2 2013 |
|
2,460 |
|
|
95 |
|
9. |
AVA Cortez Hill |
|
San Diego, CA |
|
294 |
|
10.5 |
|
|
Q1 1998 |
|
Q4 2011 |
|
Q4 2012 |
|
Q2 2013 |
|
1,655 |
|
|
133 |
|
10. |
Eaves San Jose |
|
San Jose, CA |
|
440 |
|
14.9 |
|
|
Q3 1996 |
|
Q4 2011 |
|
Q2 2013 |
|
Q4 2013 |
|
1,755 |
|
|
102 |
|
11. |
Eaves Fairfax |
|
Fairfax, VA |
|
141 |
|
4.9 |
|
|
Q2 1997 |
|
Q2 2012 |
|
Q2 2013 |
|
Q4 2013 |
|
1,740 |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total/ Weighted Average |
|
|
|
2,721 |
|
$ 97.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$2,020 |
|
|
1,614 |
|
(1) |
Exclusive of costs incurred prior to Redevelopment. |
|
|
(2) |
See Attachment #14 - Definitions and Reconciliations of Non-GAAP Financial Measures and Other Terms. |
|
|
|
This chart contains forward-looking statements. Please see the paragraph regarding forward-looking statements on the Table of Contents page relating to the Companys Supplemental Operating and Financial Data for the second quarter of 2012. |
|
|
|
|
|
Attachment 11
AvalonBay Communities, Inc.
Summary of Development and Redevelopment Community Activity (1) as of June 30, 2012
(Dollars in Thousands)
DEVELOPMENT
|
|
|
Apt Homes |
|
Total Capital |
|
Cost of Homes |
|
|
|
Construction in |
| ||||
|
|
Completed & |
|
Cost Invested |
|
Completed & |
|
Remaining to |
|
Progress at |
| ||||
|
|
Occupied |
|
During Period (2) |
|
Occupied (3) |
|
Invest (4) |
|
Period End (5) |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Total - 2010 Actual |
|
1,730 |
|
$ |
404,910 |
|
$ |
578,159 |
|
$ |
466,991 |
|
$ |
296,292 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Total - 2011 Actual |
|
1,086 |
|
$ |
525,391 |
|
$ |
298,259 |
|
$ |
804,231 |
|
$ |
578,809 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
2012 Projected: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Quarter 1 (Actual) |
|
213 |
|
$ |
151,594 |
|
$ |
54,692 |
|
$ |
775,395 |
|
$ |
663,459 |
|
Quarter 2 (Actual) |
|
698 |
|
189,325 |
|
189,201 |
|
896,049 |
|
652,000 |
| ||||
Quarter 3 (Projected) |
|
644 |
|
174,200 |
|
169,011 |
|
721,849 |
|
592,091 |
| ||||
Quarter 4 (Projected) |
|
429 |
|
163,075 |
|
102,332 |
|
558,774 |
|
628,450 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Total - 2012 Projected |
|
1,984 |
|
$ |
678,194 |
|
$ |
515,236 |
|
|
|
|
|
REDEVELOPMENT
|
|
|
|
|
Total Capital |
|
|
|
|
|
Reconstruction in |
| |||
|
|
|
|
Cost Invested |
|
|
|
Remaining to |
|
Progress at |
| |||
|
|
|
|
During Period (2) |
|
|
|
Invest (4) |
|
Period End |
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Total - 2010 Actual |
|
|
|
$ |
47,688 |
|
|
|
$ |
73,518 |
|
$ |
13,412 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Total - 2011 Actual |
|
|
|
$ |
62,986 |
|
|
|
$ |
87,646 |
|
$ |
18,790 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
2012 Projected: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Quarter 1 (Actual) |
|
|
|
$ |
15,307 |
|
|
|
$ |
67,657 |
|
$ |
25,158 |
|
Quarter 2 (Actual) |
|
|
|
25,317 |
|
|
|
46,322 |
|
29,493 |
| |||
Quarter 3 (Projected) |
|
|
|
29,025 |
|
|
|
17,297 |
|
16,761 |
| |||
Quarter 4 (Projected) |
|
|
|
10,096 |
|
|
|
7,201 |
|
7,669 |
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Total - 2012 Projected |
|
|
|
$ |
79,745 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Data is presented for all communities currently under development or redevelopment. |
|
|
(2) |
Represents Total Capital Cost incurred or expected to be incurred during the quarter, year or in total. See Attachment #14 - Definitions and Reconciliations of Non-GAAP Financial Measures and Other Terms. |
|
|
(3) |
Represents projected Total Capital Cost of apartment homes completed and occupied, or projected to be occupied during the quarter or year. Calculated by dividing Total Capital Cost for each Development Community by number of homes for the community, multiplied by the number of homes completed and occupied, or projected to be occupied during the quarter or year. |
|
|
(4) |
Represents projected Total Capital Cost remaining to invest on communities currently under construction or reconstruction. |
|
|
(5) |
2012 Quarter 2 (Actual) reflects construction in progress for communities under development and includes $21.8 million related to communities not currently under development or redevelopment. |
|
|
|
This chart contains forward-looking statements. Please see the paragraph regarding forward-looking statements on the Table of Contents page relating to the Companys Supplemental Operating and Financial Data for the second quarter of 2012. |
|
|
Attachment 12
AvalonBay Communities, Inc.
Future Development as of June 30, 2012
DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (1)
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated |
|
Total Capital | |||
|
|
# of Rights |
|
Number |
|
Cost (1) (2) | |||
|
|
|
|
of Homes |
|
(millions) | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Development Rights as of 12/31/2011 |
|
32 |
|
|
9,012 |
|
|
$ 2,581 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q1 2012 Additions |
|
3 |
|
|
934 |
|
|
$ 334 |
|
Q1 2012 Construction Starts |
|
(1 |
) |
|
(531 |
) |
|
(121 |
) |
Q1 2012 Adjustments to existing Dev Rights |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Development Rights as of 3/31/2012 |
|
34 |
|
|
9,415 |
|
|
$ 2,804 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q2 2012 Additions |
|
3 |
|
|
922 |
|
|
$ 275 |
|
Q2 2012 Construction Starts |
|
(4 |
) |
|
(1,227 |
) |
|
(308 |
) |
Q2 2012 Adjustments to existing Dev Rights |
|
- |
|
|
(74 |
) |
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Development Rights as of 6/30/2012 |
|
33 |
|
|
9,036 |
|
|
$ 2,795 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Development Rights by Market |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Boston, MA |
|
5 |
|
|
1,509 |
|
|
$ 547 |
|
Fairfield-New Haven, CT |
|
2 |
|
|
290 |
|
|
66 |
|
New York, NY (3) |
|
3 |
|
|
1,405 |
|
|
586 |
|
New Jersey |
|
10 |
|
|
2,445 |
|
|
526 |
|
Long Island, NY |
|
1 |
|
|
303 |
|
|
76 |
|
Washington, DC Metro |
|
2 |
|
|
577 |
|
|
157 |
|
Seattle, WA |
|
2 |
|
|
481 |
|
|
87 |
|
San Jose, CA |
|
1 |
|
|
250 |
|
|
76 |
|
Oakland-East Bay, CA |
|
1 |
|
|
250 |
|
|
80 |
|
San Francisco, CA |
|
2 |
|
|
455 |
|
|
206 |
|
Los Angeles, CA |
|
3 |
|
|
850 |
|
|
333 |
|
San Diego, CA |
|
1 |
|
|
221 |
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total as of June 30, 2012 |
|
33 |
|
|
9,036 |
|
|
$ 2,795 |
|
(1) |
See Attachment #14 - Definitions and Reconciliations of Non-GAAP Financial Measures and Other Terms. |
|
|
(2) |
The Company currently owns land, which was originally acquired for $222 million, for the future development of 11 of 33 Development Rights. Construction is expected to commence in 2012 or 2013 on nine of the 11 Development Rights for which land is owned. |
|
|
(3) |
Includes Development Rights in Westchester County and Rockland County, NY. |
|
|
|
This chart contains forward-looking statements. Please see the paragraph regarding forward-looking statements on the Table of Contents page relating to the Companys Supplemental Operating and Financial Data for the second quarter of 2012. |
|
|
Attachment 13
AvalonBay Communities, Inc.
Summary of Disposition Activity (1)
as of June 30, 2012
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
| ||||
|
Number of |
|
Gross Sales |
|
|
|
Depreciation |
|
Economic |
|
Initial Year |
|
Weighted Average | ||||
|
Communities Sold (2) |
|
Price |
|
GAAP Gain |
|
and Other |
|
Gain (Loss) (3) |
|
Mkt. Cap Rate (3) (4) |
|
Unleveraged IRR (3) (4) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
1998 - 2002: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
41 Communities |
|
$ |
969,339 |
|
$ |
224,887 |
|
$ |
85,935 |
|
$ |
138,952 |
|
7.9% |
|
14.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
2003 - 2007: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
33 Communities, 1 Office Building |
|
$ |
1,649,678 |
|
$ |
787,521 |
|
$ |
126,149 |
|
$ |
661,372 |
|
4.9% |
|
16.4% |
|
9 Land Parcels (5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
2008: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
10 Communities |
|
$ |
564,950 |
|
$ |
284,901 |
|
$ |
55,786 |
|
$ |
229,115 |
|
5.1% |
|
14.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
2009: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
5 Communities, 2 Land Parcels (6) |
|
$ |
193,186 |
|
$ |
68,717 |
|
$ |
16,692 |
|
$ |
52,025 |
|
6.5% |
|
13.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
2010: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
3 Communities, 1 Office Building (6) |
|
$ |
198,600 |
|
$ |
74,074 |
|
$ |
51,977 |
|
$ |
22,097 |
|
6.6% |
|
9.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
2011: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
3 Communities, 3 Land Parcels (7) |
|
$ |
292,965 |
|
$ |
287,132 |
|
$ |
156,233 |
|
$ |
130,899 |
|
5.1% |
|
16.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
2012: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
2 Communities, 1 Land Parcel (8) |
|
$ |
186,050 |
|
$ |
95,329 |
|
$ |
45,147 |
|
$ |
50,182 |
|
5.3% |
|
11.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
1998 - 2012 Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
97 Communities, 2 Office Buildings, |
|
$ |
4,054,768 |
|
$ |
1,822,561 |
|
$ |
537,919 |
|
$ |
1,284,642 |
|
5.9% |
|
14.7% |
|
15 Land Parcels |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Activity excludes dispositions by Fund I and dispositions to joint venture entities in which the Company retains an economic interest. |
|
|
(2) |
For dispositions from January 1, 1998 through December 31, 2002 the Weighted Average Holding Period is 4.5 years, for dispositions from January 1, 2003 through December 31, 2007, the Weighted Average Holding Period is 7.6 years and for dispositions from January 1, 2008 through June 30, 2012 the Weighted Average Holding Period is 12.6 years. For January 1, 1998 through June 30, 2012 the Weighted Average Holding Period is 8.5 years. |
|
|
(3) |
See Attachment #14 - Definitions and Reconciliations of Non-GAAP Financial Measures and Other Terms. |
|
|
(4) |
For purposes of this attachment, land and office building sales and the disposition of any real estate held in a joint venture for any or all of the Companys investment period, are not included in the calculation of Weighted Average Holding Period, Weighted Average Initial Year Market Cap Rate, or Weighted Average Unleveraged IRR. |
|
|
(5) |
GAAP gains for sales during this period include our proportionate share of communities held by joint ventures and the recovery of any previously recognized impairment losses. |
|
|
(6) |
2009 and 2010 GAAP and Economic Gain include the recognition of approximately $2,770 and $2,675, respectively, in deferred gains for prior year dispositions, recognition of which occurred in conjunction with settlement of associated legal matters. |
|
|
(7) |
2011 results exclude the Companys proportionate gain of $7,675 associated with an asset exchange. 2011 Accumulated Depreciation and Other includes $20,210 in impairment charges on two of the land parcels sold. |
|
|
(8) |
2012 Accumulated Depreciation and Other includes $16,363 in impairment charges for the land parcel sold. |
|
Attachment 14
AvalonBay Communities, Inc
Definitions and Reconciliations of Non-GAAP Financial Measures and Other Terms
This release, including its attachments, contains certain non-GAAP financial measures and other terms. The definition and calculation of these non-GAAP financial measures and other terms may differ from the definitions and methodologies used by other REITs and, accordingly, may not be comparable. The non-GAAP financial measures referred to below should not be considered an alternative to net income as an indication of our performance. In addition, these non-GAAP financial measures do not represent cash generated from operating activities in accordance with GAAP and therefore should not be considered as an alternative measure of liquidity or as indicative of cash available to fund cash needs.
FFO is determined based on a definition adopted by the Board of Governors of the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (NAREIT). FFO is calculated by the Company as Net income or loss attributable to common stockholders computed in accordance with GAAP, adjusted for gains or losses on sales of previously depreciated operating communities, extraordinary gains or losses (as defined by GAAP), cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle, impairment write-downs of depreciable real estate assets, write-downs of investments in affiliates which are driven by a decrease in the value of depreciable real estate assets held by the affiliate and depreciation of real estate assets, including adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. Management generally considers FFO to be an appropriate supplemental measure of operating performance because, by excluding gains or losses related to dispositions of previously depreciated operating communities and excluding real estate depreciation (which can vary among owners of identical assets in similar condition based on historical cost accounting and useful life estimates), FFO can help one compare the operating performance of a companys real estate between periods or as compared to different companies. A reconciliation of FFO to Net income attributable to common stockholders is as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
Q2 |
|
Q2 |
|
|
YTD |
|
YTD | |||
|
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
|
|
2012 |
|
2011 | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Net income attributable to common stockholders |
|
$ |
156,909 |
|
$ |
43,373 |
|
$ |
214,667 |
|
$ |
73,713 |
Depreciation - real estate assets, including discontinued operations and joint venture adjustments |
|
66,711 |
|
64,240 |
|
132,003 |
|
127,434 | ||||
Distributions to noncontrolling interests, including discontinued operations |
|
7 |
|
7 |
|
14 |
|
13 | ||||
Gain on sale of unconsolidated entities holding previously depreciated real estate assets |
|
(385) |
|
-- |
|
(1,471) |
|
-- | ||||
Gain on sale of previously depreciated real estate assets |
|
(95,049) |
|
(7,675) |
|
(95,049) |
|
(7,675) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
FFO attributable to common stockholders |
|
$ |
128,193 |
|
$ |
99,945 |
|
$ |
250,164 |
|
$ |
193,485 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Average shares outstanding - diluted |
|
95,992,825 |
|
88,196,438 |
|
95,820,203 |
|
87,597,981 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Earnings per share - diluted |
|
$ |
1.63 |
|
$ |
0.49 |
|
$ |
2.24 |
|
$ |
0.84 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
FFO per common share - diluted |
|
$ |
1.34 |
|
$ |
1.13 |
|
$ |
2.61 |
|
$ |
2.21 |
|
The Companys results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and the comparable prior year periods include the non-routine items outlined in the following table:
Attachment 14
|
Non-Routine Items
Decrease (Increase) in Net income and FFO
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
Q2 |
|
YTD |
|
Q2 |
|
YTD |
|
|
2012 |
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
|
2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepayment penalties and write off of deferred financing costs |
|
$ 602 |
|
$ 1,853 |
|
$ - |
|
$ - |
Acquisition costs - consolidated and joint venture (1) |
|
81 |
|
304 |
|
1,242 |
|
1,276 |
Gain on Land Sales |
|
(280) |
|
(280) |
|
- |
|
- |
Severance and related costs |
|
160 |
|
467 |
|
(400) |
|
(400) |
Interest income on escrow |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
(2,478) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-routine items |
|
$ 563 |
|
$ 2,344 |
|
$ 842 |
|
$ (1,602) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average dilutive shares outstanding |
|
95,992,825 |
|
95,820,203 |
|
88,196,438 |
|
87,597,981 |
(1) Includes the Companys proportionate share of acquisition costs for joint venture acquisitions.
|
Projected FFO, as provided within this release in the Companys outlook, is calculated on a basis consistent with historical FFO, and is therefore considered to be an appropriate supplemental measure to projected Net Income from projected operating performance. A reconciliation of the range provided for Projected FFO per share (diluted) for the third quarter and full year 2012 to the range provided for projected EPS (diluted) is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Low |
|
High |
|
|
|
Range |
|
Range |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projected EPS (diluted) - Q3 2012 |
|
$ 1.00 |
|
$ 1.04 |
|
Projected depreciation (real estate related) |
|
0.67 |
|
0.71 |
|
Projected gain on sale of operating communities |
|
(0.29) |
|
(0.33) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projected FFO per share (diluted) - Q3 2012 |
|
$ 1.38 |
|
$ 1.42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projected EPS (diluted) - Full Year 2012 |
|
$ 5.11 |
|
$ 5.25 |
|
Projected depreciation (real estate related) |
|
2.69 |
|
2.83 |
|
Projected gain on sale of operating communities |
|
(2.41) |
|
(2.55) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projected FFO per share (diluted) - Full Year 2012 |
|
$ 5.39 |
|
$ 5.53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOI is defined by the Company as total property revenue less direct property operating expenses (including property taxes), and excludes corporate-level income (including management, development and other fees), corporate-level property management and other indirect operating expenses, investments and investment management expenses, expensed development and other pursuit costs, net interest expense, gain (loss) on extinguishment of debt, general and administrative expense, joint venture income (loss), depreciation expense, impairment loss on land holdings, gain on sale of real estate assets and income from discontinued operations. The Company considers NOI to be an appropriate supplemental measure to Net Income of operating performance of a community or communities because it helps both investors and management to understand the core operations of a community or communities prior to the allocation of corporate-level property management overhead or general and administrative costs. This is more reflective of the operating performance of a community, and allows for an easier comparison of the operating performance of single assets or groups of assets. In addition, because prospective buyers of real estate have
Attachment 14
different overhead structures, with varying marginal impact to overhead by acquiring real estate, NOI is considered by many in the real estate industry to be a useful measure for determining the value of a real estate asset or groups of assets.
A reconciliation of NOI (from continuing operations) to Net Income, as well as a breakdown of NOI by operating segment, is as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
Q2 |
|
Q2 |
|
Q1 |
|
Q4 |
|
YTD |
|
YTD |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ 156,821 |
|
$ 43,192 |
|
$ 57,609 |
|
$ 322,965 |
|
$ 214,430 |
|
$ 73,728 |
|
Indirect operating expenses, net of corporate income |
|
8,617 |
|
7,701 |
|
8,036 |
|
8,096 |
|
16,653 |
|
14,729 |
|
Investments and investment management expense |
|
1,499 |
|
1,341 |
|
1,446 |
|
1,266 |
|
2,945 |
|
2,532 |
|
Expensed acquisition, development and other pursuit costs |
|
901 |
|
1,353 |
|
239 |
|
330 |
|
1,141 |
|
2,003 |
|
Interest expense, net |
|
33,193 |
|
44,544 |
|
33,626 |
|
37,640 |
|
66,819 |
|
87,515 |
|
(Gain) loss on extinguishment of debt, net |
|
-- |
|
-- |
|
1,179 |
|
1,940 |
|
1,179 |
|
-- |
|
General and administrative expense |
|
8,316 |
|
8,145 |
|
9,710 |
|
7,847 |
|
18,026 |
|
15,437 |
|
Joint venture loss (income) |
|
(2,073) |
|
(395) |
|
(2,175) |
|
(1,607) |
|
(4,248) |
|
(898) |
|
Depreciation expense |
|
64,875 |
|
60,836 |
|
62,561 |
|
61,991 |
|
127,436 |
|
120,059 |
|
Gain on sale of real estate assets |
|
(95,329) |
|
(7,675) |
|
-- |
|
(273,415) |
|
(95,329) |
|
(7,675) |
|
(Income) loss from discontinued operations |
|
(1,152) |
|
(283) |
|
(1,717) |
|
845 |
|
(2,870) |
|
(303) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOI from continuing operations |
|
$ 175,668 |
|
$ 158,759 |
|
$ 170,514 |
|
$ 167,898 |
|
$ 346,182 |
|
$ 307,127 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Established: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New England |
|
$ 27,263 |
|
$ 25,797 |
|
$ 26,631 |
|
$ 27,299 |
|
$ 53,894 |
|
$ 50,280 |
|
Metro NY/NJ |
|
40,637 |
|
38,230 |
|
39,591 |
|
38,571 |
|
80,228 |
|
74,281 |
|
Mid-Atlantic |
|
18,722 |
|
18,282 |
|
18,816 |
|
19,063 |
|
37,538 |
|
35,958 |
|
Pacific NW |
|
5,651 |
|
5,160 |
|
5,572 |
|
5,229 |
|
11,223 |
|
10,141 |
|
No. California |
|
23,235 |
|
20,600 |
|
22,793 |
|
21,917 |
|
46,028 |
|
40,338 |
|
So. California |
|
17,023 |
|
15,687 |
|
16,979 |
|
17,326 |
|
34,002 |
|
30,855 |
|
Total Established |
|
132,531 |
|
123,756 |
|
130,382 |
|
129,405 |
|
262,913 |
|
241,853 |
|
Other Stabilized |
|
23,244 |
|
20,273 |
|
22,705 |
|
21,344 |
|
45,949 |
|
36,344 |
|
Development/Redevelopment |
|
19,893 |
|
14,730 |
|
17,427 |
|
17,149 |
|
37,320 |
|
28,930 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOI from continuing operations |
|
$ 175,668 |
|
$ 158,759 |
|
$ 170,514 |
|
$ 167,898 |
|
$ 346,182 |
|
$ 307,127 |
|
|
Attachment 14
NOI as reported by the Company does not include the operating results from discontinued operations (i.e., assets sold during the period January 1, 2011 through June 30, 2012 or classified as held for sale at June 30, 2012). A reconciliation of NOI from communities sold or classified as discontinued operations to Net Income for these communities is as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
Q2 |
|
Q2 |
|
YTD |
|
YTD |
|
|
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations |
|
$ 1,152 |
|
$ 283 |
|
$ 2,870 |
|
$ 303 |
|
Interest expense, net |
|
53 |
|
1,311 |
|
133 |
|
2,611 |
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
|
602 |
|
-- |
|
602 |
|
-- |
|
Depreciation expense |
|
144 |
|
2,084 |
|
895 |
|
4,160 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOI from discontinued operations |
|
$ 1,951 |
|
$ 3,678 |
|
$ 4,500 |
|
$ 7,074 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOI from assets sold |
|
1,951 |
|
3,678 |
|
4,500 |
|
7,074 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOI from discontinued operations |
|
$ 1,951 |
|
$ 3,678 |
|
$ 4,500 |
|
$ 7,074 |
|
|
Projected NOI, as used within this release for certain Development Communities and in calculating the Initial Year Market Cap Rate for dispositions, represents managements estimate, as of the date of this release (or as of the date of the buyers valuation in the case of dispositions), of projected stabilized rental revenue minus projected stabilized operating expenses. For Development Communities, Projected NOI is calculated based on the first twelve months of Stabilized Operations, as defined below, following the completion of construction. In calculating the Initial Year Market Cap Rate, Projected NOI for dispositions is calculated for the first twelve months following the date of the buyers valuation. Projected stabilized rental revenue represents managements estimate of projected gross potential minus projected stabilized economic vacancy and adjusted for projected stabilized concessions plus projected stabilized other rental revenue. Projected stabilized operating expenses do not include interest, income taxes (if any), depreciation or amortization, or any allocation of corporate-level property management overhead or general and administrative costs. Projected gross potential for Development Communities and dispositions is based on leased rents for occupied homes and managements best estimate of rental levels for homes which are currently unleased, as well as those homes which will become available for lease during the twelve month forward period used to develop Projected NOI. The weighted average Projected NOI as a percentage of Total Capital Cost is weighted based on the Companys share of the Total Capital Cost of each community, based on its percentage ownership.
Management believes that Projected NOI of the Development Communities, on an aggregated weighted average basis, assists investors in understanding managements estimate of the likely impact on operations of the Development Communities when the assets are complete and achieve stabilized occupancy (before allocation of any corporate-level property management overhead, general and administrative costs or interest expense). However, in this release the Company has not given a projection of NOI on a company-wide basis. Given the different dates and fiscal years for which NOI is projected for these communities, the projected allocation of corporate-level property management overhead, general and administrative costs and interest expense to communities under development is complex, impractical to develop, and may not be meaningful. Projected NOI of these communities is not a projection of the Companys overall financial performance or cash flow. There can be no assurance that the communities under development or redevelopment will achieve the Projected NOI as described in this release.
Rental Revenue with Concessions on a Cash Basis is considered by the Company to be a supplemental measure to rental revenue in conformity with GAAP to help investors evaluate the impact of both current and historical concessions on GAAP-based rental revenue and to more readily enable comparisons to revenue as reported by other companies. In addition, rental revenue (with concessions on a cash basis) allows an investor to understand the historical trend in cash concessions.
Attachment 14
A reconciliation of rental revenue from Established Communities in conformity with GAAP to rental revenue (with concessions on a cash basis) is as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
Q2 |
|
Q2 |
|
YTD |
|
YTD |
|
|
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental revenue (GAAP basis) |
|
$ 190,196 |
|
$ 179,775 |
|
$ 377,504 |
|
$ 355,491 |
|
Concessions amortized |
|
97 |
|
1,186 |
|
295 |
|
2,783 |
|
Concessions granted |
|
(15) |
|
(378) |
|
(86) |
|
(1,133) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental revenue (with concessions on a cash basis) |
|
$ 190,278 |
|
$ 180,583 |
|
$ 377,713 |
|
$ 357,141 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% change -- GAAP revenue |
|
|
|
5.8% |
|
|
|
6.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% change -- cash revenue |
|
|
|
5.4% |
|
|
|
5.8% |
|
|
Economic Gain (Loss) is calculated by the Company as the gain (loss) on sale in accordance with GAAP, less accumulated depreciation through the date of sale and any other non-cash adjustments that may be required under GAAP accounting. Management generally considers Economic Gain (Loss) to be an appropriate supplemental measure to gain (loss) on sale in accordance with GAAP because it helps investors to understand the relationship between the cash proceeds from a sale and the cash invested in the sold community. The Economic Gain (Loss) for each of the communities presented is estimated based on their respective final settlement statements. A reconciliation of Economic Gain (Loss) to gain on sale in accordance with GAAP for the quarter ended June 30, 2012 as well as prior years activities is presented on Attachment 13.
Interest Coverage is calculated by the Company as EBITDA from continuing operations, excluding land gains and gain on the sale of investments in real estate joint ventures, divided by the sum of interest expense, net, and preferred dividends. Interest Coverage is presented by the Company because it provides rating agencies and investors an additional means of comparing our ability to service debt obligations to that of other companies. EBITDA is defined by the Company as net income or loss attributable to the Company before interest income and expense, income taxes, depreciation and amortization.
A reconciliation of EBITDA and a calculation of Interest Coverage for the second quarter of 2012 are as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
Net income attributable to common stockholders |
|
$ 156,909 |
|
Interest expense, net |
|
33,193 |
|
Interest expense (discontinued operations) |
|
53 |
|
Depreciation expense |
|
64,875 |
|
Depreciation expense (discontinued operations) |
|
144 |
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA |
|
$ 255,174 |
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA from continuing operations |
|
$ 158,776 |
|
EBITDA from discontinued operations |
|
96,398 |
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA |
|
$ 255,174 |
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA from continuing operations |
|
$ 158,776 |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net |
|
$ 33,193 |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest coverage |
|
4.8 |
|
|
Attachment 14
Total Capital Cost includes all capitalized costs projected to be or actually incurred to develop the respective Development or Redevelopment Community, or Development Right, including land acquisition costs, construction costs, real estate taxes, capitalized interest and loan fees, permits, professional fees, allocated development overhead and other regulatory fees, all as determined in accordance with GAAP. For Redevelopment Communities, Total Capital Cost excludes costs incurred prior to the start of redevelopment when indicated. With respect to communities where development or redevelopment was completed in a prior or the current period, Total Capital Cost reflects the actual cost incurred, plus any contingency estimate made by management. Total Capital Cost for communities identified as having joint venture ownership, either during construction or upon construction completion, represents the total projected joint venture contribution amount. For joint ventures not in construction, Total Capital Cost is equal to gross real estate cost.
Initial Year Market Cap Rate is defined by the Company as Projected NOI of a single community for the first 12 months of operations (assuming no repositioning), less estimates for non-routine allowance of approximately $ 200 - $ 300 per apartment home, divided by the gross sales price for the community. Projected NOI, as referred to above, represents managements estimate of projected rental revenue minus projected operating expenses before interest, income taxes (if any), depreciation, amortization and extraordinary items. For this purpose, managements projection of operating expenses for the community includes a management fee of 3.0% - 3.5%. The Initial Year Market Cap Rate, which may be determined in a different manner by others, is a measure frequently used in the real estate industry when determining the appropriate purchase price for a property or estimating the value for a property. Buyers may assign different Initial Year Market Cap Rates to different communities when determining the appropriate value because they (i) may project different rates of change in operating expenses and capital expenditure estimates and (ii) may project different rates of change in future rental revenue due to different estimates for changes in rent and occupancy levels. The weighted average Initial Year Market Cap Rate is weighted based on the gross sales price of each community.
Unleveraged IRR on sold communities refers to the internal rate of return calculated by the Company considering the timing and amounts of (i) total revenue during the period owned by the Company and (ii) the gross sales price net of selling costs, offset by (iii) the undepreciated capital cost of the communities at the time of sale and (iv) total direct operating expenses during the period owned by the Company. Each of the items (i), (ii), (iii) and (iv) are calculated in accordance with GAAP.
The calculation of Unleveraged IRR does not include an adjustment for the Companys general and administrative expense, interest expense, or corporate-level property management and other indirect operating expenses. Therefore, Unleveraged IRR is not a substitute for Net Income as a measure of our performance. Management believes that the Unleveraged IRR achieved during the period a community is owned by the Company is useful because it is one indication of the gross value created by the Companys acquisition, development or redevelopment, management and sale of a community, before the impact of indirect expenses and Company overhead. The Unleveraged IRR achieved on the communities as cited in this release should not be viewed as an indication of the gross value created with respect to other communities owned by the Company, and the Company does not represent that it will achieve similar Unleveraged IRRs upon the disposition of other communities. The weighted average Unleveraged IRR for sold communities is weighted based on all cash flows over the holding period for each respective community, including net sales proceeds.
Unencumbered NOI as calculated by the Company represents NOI generated by real estate assets unencumbered by either outstanding secured debt or land leases (excluding land leases with purchase options that were put in place for governmental incentives or tax abatements) as a percentage of total NOI generated by real estate assets. The Company believes that current and prospective unsecured creditors of the Company view Unencumbered NOI as one indication of the borrowing capacity of the Company. Therefore, when reviewed together with the Companys Interest Coverage, EBITDA and cash flow from operations, the Company believes that investors and creditors view Unencumbered NOI as a useful supplemental measure for determining the financial flexibility of an entity. A calculation of Unencumbered NOI for the six months ended June 30, 2012 is as follows (dollars in thousands):
Attachment 14
|
NOI for Established Communities |
|
$ 262,913 |
|
NOI for Other Stabilized Communities |
|
45,949 |
|
NOI for Development/Redevelopment Communities |
|
37,320 |
|
NOI for discontinued operations |
|
4,500 |
|
Total NOI generated by real estate assets |
|
350,682 |
|
NOI on encumbered assets |
|
96,075 |
|
NOI on unencumbered assets |
|
254,607 |
|
|
|
|
|
Unencumbered NOI |
|
73% |
|
|
Established Communities are identified by the Company as communities where a comparison of operating results from the prior year to the current year is meaningful, as these communities were owned and had Stabilized Operations, as defined below, as of the beginning of the prior year. Therefore, for 2012, Established Communities are consolidated communities that have Stabilized Operations as of January 1, 2011 and are not conducting or planning to conduct substantial redevelopment activities within the current year. Established Communities do not include communities that are currently held for sale or planned for disposition during the current year. While the Company establishes the classification of its communities on an annual basis, the Company may update the classification of its communities during the calendar year to the extent that its plans with regard to the disposition or redevelopment of a community change during the year.
Other Stabilized Communities are completed consolidated communities that the Company owns, which did not have stabilized operations as of January 1, 2011, but have stabilized occupancy as of January 1, 2012. Other Stabilized Communities do not include communities that are planning to conduct substantial redevelopment activities or that are planned for disposition within the current year. While the Company establishes the classification of its communities on an annual basis, the Company may update the classification of its communities during the calendar year to the extent that its plans with regard to the disposition or redevelopment of a community change during the year.
Development Communities are communities that are under construction during the current year. These communities may be partially or fully complete and operating.
Redevelopment Communities are communities where the Company owns a majority interest and where substantial redevelopment is in progress or is planned to begin during the current year. Redevelopment is generally considered substantial when capital invested during the reconstruction effort is expected to exceed either $ 5,000,000 or 10% of the communitys pre-development basis and is expected to have a material impact on the communitys operations, including occupancy levels and future rental rates. While the Company establishes the classification of its communities on an annual basis, the Company may update the classification of its communities during the calendar year to the extent that its plans with regard to the disposition or redevelopment of a community change during the year.
Average Rental Rates are calculated by the Company as rental revenue in accordance with GAAP, divided by the weighted average number of occupied apartment homes.
Economic Occupancy is defined as total possible revenue less vacancy loss as a percentage of total possible revenue. Total possible revenue is determined by valuing occupied units at contract rates and vacant units at Market Rents. Vacancy loss is determined by valuing vacant units at current Market Rents. By measuring vacant apartments at their Market Rents, Economic Occupancy takes into account the fact that apartment homes of different sizes and locations within a community have different economic impacts on a communitys gross revenue.
Market Rents as reported by the Company are based on the current market rates set by the managers of the Companys communities based on their experience in renting their communities apartments and publicly available market data. Trends in market rents for a region as reported by others could vary. Market Rents for a period are based on the average Market Rents during that period and do not reflect any impact for cash concessions.
Non-Revenue Generating Capex represents capital expenditures that will not directly result in revenue earnings or expense savings.
Attachment 14
Stabilized/Restabilized Operations is defined as the earlier of (i) attainment of 95% physical occupancy or (ii) the one-year anniversary of completion of development or redevelopment.
Average Rent per Home as calculated for certain Development and Redevelopment Communities in lease-up, reflects managements projected stabilized rents net of estimated stabilized concessions and including estimated stabilized other rental revenue. Projected stabilized rents are based on one or more of the following: (i) actual average leased rents on apartments leased through quarter end; (ii) projected rollover rents on apartments leased through quarter end where the lease term expires within the first twelve months of Stabilized Operations, and Market Rents on unleased homes.
Development Rights are development opportunities in the early phase of the development process for which the Company either has an option to acquire land or enter into a leasehold interest, for which the Company is the buyer under a long-term conditional contract to purchase land or where the Company controls the land through a ground lease or owns land to develop a new community. The Company capitalizes related pre-development costs incurred in pursuit of new developments for which future development is probable.