SUPPLEMENTAL DISCUSSION OF THIRD QUARTER 2011 OPERATING RESULTS
Published on November 1, 2011
Exhibit 99.2
For Immediate News Release
October 31, 2011
AVALONBAY COMMUNITIES, INC. ANNOUNCES
THIRD QUARTER 2011 OPERATING RESULTS
Copyright © 2011 AvalonBay Communities, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Copyright © 2011 AvalonBay Communities, Inc. All Rights Reserved |
Copyright © 2011 AvalonBay Communities, Inc. All Rights Reserved |
Copyright © 2011 AvalonBay Communities, Inc. All Rights Reserved |
Copyright © 2011 AvalonBay Communities, Inc. All Rights Reserved
THIRD QUARTER 2011
Supplemental Operating and Financial Data
Table of Contents
Company Profile |
||
Selected Operating and Other Information |
Attachment 1 | |
Detailed Operating Information |
Attachment 2 | |
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet |
Attachment 3 | |
Sequential Operating Information by Business Segment |
Attachment 4 | |
Market Profile |
||
Quarterly Revenue and Occupancy Changes (Established Communities) |
Attachment 5 | |
Sequential Quarterly Revenue and Occupancy Changes (Established Communities) |
Attachment 6 | |
Year-to-Date Revenue and Occupancy Changes (Established Communities) |
Attachment 7 | |
Operating Expenses (Opex) (Established Communities) |
Attachment 8 | |
Development, Redevelopment, Acquisition and Disposition Profile |
||
Development Communities |
Attachment 9 | |
Redevelopment Communities |
Attachment 10 | |
Summary of Development and Redevelopment Community Activity |
Attachment 11 | |
Future Development |
Attachment 12 | |
Summary of Disposition Activity |
Attachment 13 | |
Definitions and Reconciliations |
||
Definitions and Reconciliations of Non-GAAP Financial Measures and Other Terms |
Attachment 14 |
The following is a Safe Harbor Statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The projections and estimates contained in the following attachments are forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties, and actual results may differ materially from those projected in such statements. Risks associated with the Companys development, redevelopment, construction, and lease-up activities, which could impact the forward-looking statements made, are discussed in the paragraph titled Forward-Looking Statements in the release to which these attachments relate. In particular, development opportunities may be abandoned; Total Capital Cost of a community may exceed original estimates, possibly making the community uneconomical and/or affecting projected returns; construction and lease-up may not be completed on schedule, resulting in increased debt service and construction costs; and other risks described in the Companys filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 and the Companys Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for subsequent quarters.
Attachment 1
AvalonBay Communities, Inc.
Selected Operating and Other Information
September 30, 2011
(Dollars in thousands except per share data)
(unaudited)
SELECTED OPERATING INFORMATION |
Q3 2011 |
Q3 2010 |
% Change |
YTD 2011 |
YTD 2010 |
% Change | |||||||||||||||||||
Net income attributable to |
$ 44,824 | $ 24,654 | 81.8% | $ 118,537 | $ 148,304 | (20.1%) | ||||||||||||||||||
Per common share - basic |
$0.49 | $0.29 | 69.0% | $ 1.34 | $ 1.77 | (24.3%) | ||||||||||||||||||
Per common share - diluted |
$0.49 | $0.29 | 69.0% | $ 1.33 | $ 1.76 | (24.4%) | ||||||||||||||||||
Funds from Operations |
$ 107,587 | $ 84,462 | 27.4% | $ 301,072 | $ 251,524 | 19.7% | ||||||||||||||||||
Per common share - diluted |
$1.17 | $0.98 | 19.4% | $3.38 | $ 2.99 | 13.0% | ||||||||||||||||||
Dividends declared - common |
$ 84,801 | $ 76,117 | 11.4% | $ 241,876 | $ 225,854 | 7.1% | ||||||||||||||||||
Per common share |
$ 0.8925 | $ 0.8925 | 0.0% | $ 2.6775 | $ 2.6775 | 0.0% | ||||||||||||||||||
Common shares outstanding |
95,015,548 | 85,284,865 | 11.4% | 95,015,548 | 85,284,865 | 11.4% | ||||||||||||||||||
Outstanding operating partnership |
7,707 | 15,325 | (49.7%) | 7,707 | 15,325 | (49.7%) | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total outstanding shares and units |
95,023,255 | 85,300,190 | 11.4% | 95,023,255 | 85,300,190 | 11.4% | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Average shares and participating |
91,810,788 | 85,203,030 | 7.8% | 88,616,156 | 83,628,002 | 6.0% | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Weighted shares - basic |
91,388,357 | 84,968,804 | 7.6% | 88,312,930 | 83,385,833 | 5.9% | ||||||||||||||||||
Average operating partnership units |
7,707 | 15,346 | (49.8%) | 8,559 | 15,349 | (44.2%) | ||||||||||||||||||
Effect of dilutive securities |
944,304 | 784,546 | 20.4% | 878,009 | 728,712 | 20.5% | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Average shares outstanding - diluted |
92,340,368 | 85,768,696 | 7.7% | 89,199,498 | 84,129,894 | 6.0% | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DEBT COMPOSITION AND MATURITIES |
CAPITALIZED COSTS |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Debt Composition (1) | Amount | Average Interest Rate (2) |
Remaining Maturities (1) |
Cap Interest |
Cap Overhead |
Non-Rev Capex per Home |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Conventional Debt |
2011 | $3,885 | Q311 | $ 8,946 | $ 5,893 | $ 181 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Long-term, fixed rate |
$ 3,054,373 | 2012 | $411,170 | Q211 | $ 7,673 | $ 6,058 | $ 128 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Long-term, variable rate |
$98,946 | 2013 | $433,179 | Q111 | $ 6,343 | $ 5,868 | $ 53 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Variable rate facilities (3) |
-- | 2014 | $199,131 | Q410 | $ 6,128 | $ 5,399 | $ 175 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subtotal, Conventional |
$ 3,153,319 | 5.6% | 2015 | $419,480 | Q310 | $ 7,774 | $ 5,179 | $ 122 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tax-Exempt Debt |
COMMUNITY INFORMATION |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Long-term, fixed rate |
$ 182,976 | Apartment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Long-term, variable rate |
$ 449,535 | Communities | Homes | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subtotal, Tax-Exempt |
$ 632,511 | 3.2% | Current Communities | 184 | 53,826 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Development Communities | 15 | 3,600 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Debt |
$ 3,785,830 | 5.2% | Development Rights | 29 | 8,679 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
(1) Excludes debt associated with assets classified as held for sale.
(2) Includes costs of financing such as credit enhancement fees, trustees fees, etc.
(3) Represents the Companys $750 million unsecured credit facility, under which no amounts were drawn at September 30,
Attachment 2
AvalonBay Communities, Inc.
Detailed Operating Information
September 30, 2011
(Dollars in thousands except per share data)
(unaudited)
Q3
2011 |
Q3
2010 |
% Change |
YTD
2011 |
YTD
2010 |
% Change | |||||||||||||||||||
Revenue: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rental and other income |
$ 248,644 | $ 223,758 | 11.1% | $ 720,535 | $ 652,000 | 10.5% | ||||||||||||||||||
Management, development and other fees |
2,433 | 1,800 | 35.2% | 7,085 | 5,334 | 32.8% | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total |
251,077 | 225,558 | 11.3% | 727,620 | 657,334 | 10.7% | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Direct property operating expenses, |
57,894 | 55,835 | 3.7% | 164,352 | 158,789 | 3.5% | ||||||||||||||||||
Property taxes |
24,535 | 23,225 | 5.6% | 73,238 | 69,191 | 5.8% | ||||||||||||||||||
Property management and other indirect |
10,162 | 8,971 | 13.3% | 29,553 | 27,287 | 8.3% | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total operating expenses |
92,591 | 88,031 | 5.2% | 267,143 | 255,267 | 4.7% | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Interest expense, net |
(43,970) | (44,262) | (0.7%) | (134,096) | (128,260) | 4.6% | ||||||||||||||||||
General and administrative expense |
(6,087) | (7,039) | (13.5%) | (21,524) | (19,975) | 7.8% | ||||||||||||||||||
Joint venture income (1) |
2,615 | (325) | (904.6%) | 3,513 | 364 | 865.1% | ||||||||||||||||||
Investments and investment management expense |
(1,328) | (1,026) | 29.4% | (3,860) | (3,111) | 24.1% | ||||||||||||||||||
Expensed acquisition, development and other pursuit costs |
(633) | (737) | (14.1%) | (2,636) | (1,685) | 56.4% | ||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation expense |
(62,262) | (57,926) | 7.5% | (185,071) | (169,819) | 9.0% | ||||||||||||||||||
Impairment loss |
(14,052) | -- | N/A | (14,052) | -- | N/A | ||||||||||||||||||
Gain on sale of land |
13,716 | -- | N/A | 13,716 | -- | N/A | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Income from continuing operations |
46,485 | 26,212 | 77.3% | 116,467 | 79,581 | 46.4% | ||||||||||||||||||
Discontinued operations: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loss from discontinued operations (2) |
(1,808) | (2,232) | (19.0%) | (5,737) | (4,387) | 30.8% | ||||||||||||||||||
Gain on sale of real estate |
-- | -- | N/A | 7,675 | 72,220 | (89.4%) | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total discontinued operations |
(1,808) | (2,232) | (19.0%) | 1,938 | 67,833 | (97.1%) | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Net income |
44,677 | 23,980 | 86.3% | 118,405 | 147,414 | (19.7%) | ||||||||||||||||||
Net loss attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interests |
147 | 674 | (78.2%) | 132 | 890 | (85.2%) | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Net income attributable to common stockholders |
$ 44,824 | $ 24,654 | 81.8% | $ 118,537 | $ 148,304 | (20.1%) | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Net income attributable to common stockholders per common share - basic |
$ 0.49 | $ 0.29 | 69.0% | $ 1.34 | $ 1.77 | (24.3%) | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Net income attributable to common stockholders per common share - diluted |
$ 0.49 | $ 0.29 | 69.0% | $ 1.33 | $ 1.76 | (24.4%) | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) | Amounts for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 include $1,743 related to the sale of an unconsolidated community. |
(2) | Reflects net income or loss for investments in real estate classified as held for sale at September 30, 2011 and investments in real estate sold during the period from January 1, 2010 through September 30, 2011. The following table details income (loss) from discontinued operations for the periods shown: |
Q3
2011 |
Q3
2010 |
YTD
2011 |
YTD
2010 |
|||||||||||||||
Rental income |
|
$ 2,111 |
|
$ 2,152 | $ 6,235 | $ 10,182 | ||||||||||||
Operating and other expenses |
(3,445) | (3,557) | (10,088) | (12,061) | ||||||||||||||
Depreciation expense |
(474) | (827) | (1,884) | (2,508) | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Loss from discontinued operations |
$ (1,808) | $ (2,232) | $ (5,737) | $ (4,387) | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attachment 3
AvalonBay Communities, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Dollars in thousands)
(unaudited)
September 30,
2011 |
December 31,
2010 |
|||||||
Real estate |
$ | 8,326,086 | $ | 8,084,574 | ||||
Less accumulated depreciation |
(1,825,094) | (1,682,845) | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
Net operating real estate |
6,500,992 | 6,401,729 | ||||||
Construction in progress, including land |
483,007 | 309,704 | ||||||
Land held for development |
273,458 | 184,150 | ||||||
Operating real estate assets held for sale, net |
58,326 | 60,062 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
Total real estate, net |
7,315,783 | 6,955,645 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
690,049 | 305,644 | ||||||
Cash in escrow |
68,978 | 173,343 | ||||||
Resident security deposits |
23,779 | 22,047 | ||||||
Other assets |
390,068 | 364,809 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
Total assets |
$ | 8,488,657 | $ | 7,821,488 | ||||
|
|
|||||||
Unsecured notes, net |
$ | 1,629,234 | $ | 1,820,141 | ||||
Notes payable, net |
2,155,859 | 2,247,516 | ||||||
Resident security deposits |
37,550 | 33,785 | ||||||
Liabilities related to assets held for sale |
122,996 | 115,078 | ||||||
Other liabilities |
379,912 | 275,115 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
Total liabilities |
$ | 4,325,551 | $ | 4,491,635 | ||||
|
|
|||||||
Redeemable noncontrolling interests |
6,844 | 14,262 | ||||||
Stockholders equity |
4,156,262 | 3,315,591 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
$ | 8,488,657 | $ | 7,821,488 | ||||
|
|
Attachment 4
AvalonBay Communities, Inc.
Sequential Operating Information by Business Segment (1)
September 30, 2011
(Dollars in thousands)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total Homes |
Quarter Ended September 30, 2011 |
Quarter Ended June 30, 2011 |
Quarter Ended March 31, 2011 |
Quarter Ended December 31, 2010 |
||||||||||||||||
RENTAL REVENUE |
||||||||||||||||||||
Established (2) |
31,611 | $ 179,062 | $ 174,651 | $ 171,018 | $ 169,781 | |||||||||||||||
Other Stabilized (2) (3) |
6,511 | 34,788 | 33,651 | 31,542 | 30,091 | |||||||||||||||
Redevelopment (2) |
4,899 | 24,909 | 24,201 | 23,506 | 23,332 | |||||||||||||||
Development (2) |
4,258 | 8,829 | 7,014 | 5,191 | 3,861 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total Consolidated Communities |
47,279 | $ 247,588 | $ 239,517 | $ 231,257 | $ 227,065 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
OPERATING EXPENSE |
||||||||||||||||||||
Established |
$ 58,606 | $ 55,240 | $ 56,990 | $ 57,170 | ||||||||||||||||
Other Stabilized |
12,447 | 12,190 | 11,552 | 10,807 | ||||||||||||||||
Redevelopment |
7,576 | 7,194 | 7,022 | 7,655 | ||||||||||||||||
Development |
3,801 | 2,163 | 2,809 | 2,351 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total Consolidated Communities |
$ 82,430 | $ 76,787 | $ 78,373 | $ 77,983 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
NOI (2) |
||||||||||||||||||||
Established |
$ 120,540 | $ 119,487 | $ 114,165 | $ 112,841 | ||||||||||||||||
Other Stabilized |
23,309 | 22,274 | 20,025 | 19,830 | ||||||||||||||||
Redevelopment |
17,343 | 17,021 | 16,499 | 15,697 | ||||||||||||||||
Development |
5,028 | 4,861 | 2,390 | 1,505 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total Consolidated Communities |
$ 166,220 | $ 163,643 | $ 153,079 | $ 149,873 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
AVERAGE REVENUE PER OCCUPIED HOME |
||||||||||||||||||||
Established |
$ 1,973 | $ 1,917 | $ 1,879 | $ 1,873 | ||||||||||||||||
Other Stabilized |
1,834 | 1,771 | 1,871 | 1,854 | ||||||||||||||||
Redevelopment |
1,795 | 1,736 | 1,692 | 1,674 | ||||||||||||||||
Development (4) |
1,981 | 1,885 | 1,902 | 1,909 | ||||||||||||||||
ECONOMIC OCCUPANCY |
||||||||||||||||||||
Established |
95.7% | 96.1% | 96.0% | 95.6% | ||||||||||||||||
Other Stabilized |
95.5% | 95.8% | 95.4% | 92.3% | ||||||||||||||||
Redevelopment |
94.4% | 94.9% | 94.5% | 94.9% | ||||||||||||||||
Development (5) |
60.0% | 63.5% | 69.5% | 51.4% | ||||||||||||||||
STABILIZED COMMUNITIES TURNOVER 2011 / 2010 (6) |
|
67.3% / 62.8% | 55.8% / 56.6% | 43.5% / 42.1% | 45.4% |
(1) Excludes amounts related to communities that have been sold, or that are classified as held for sale.
(2) See Attachment #14 - Definitions and Reconciliations of Non-GAAP Financial Measures and Other Terms.
(3) Results for these communities for quarters prior to January 1, 2011 may reflect community operations prior to stabilization, including periods of lease-up, such that occupancy levels are below what would be considered stabilized. In addition, period-over-period comparability for these communities is impacted by acquisition activity, results for which will not impact quarters prior to acquisition.
(4) Average revenue per occupied home for Development Communities includes only those assets with at least one full quarter of lease-up activity and is subject to variability due to the inclusion of transactional fees, which are typically higher during lease-up than post-stabilization.
(5) Economic Occupancy for Development communities is calculated based on the communities currently generating revenue. For detail of occupancy rates for communities under construction, and communities for which construction has completed, but the community has not yet reached stabilized occupancy, see Attachment #9, Development Communities.
(6) Turnover represents the annualized number of units turned over during the quarter, divided by the total number of apartment homes for communities with stabilized occupancy for the respective reporting period.
Attachment 5
AvalonBay Communities, Inc.
Quarterly Revenue and Occupancy Changes - Established Communities (1)
September 30, 2011
Apartment Homes |
Average Rental Rates (2) | Economic Occupancy | Rental Revenue ($000s) (3) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Q3 11 | Q3 10 | % Change | Q3 11 | Q3 10 | % Change | Q3 11 | Q3 10 | % Change | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
New England |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Boston, MA |
4,866 | $ 2,040 | $ 1,904 | 7.1% | 95.9% | 96.4% | (0.5%) | $ 28,545 | $ 26,783 | 6.6% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fairfield-New Haven, CT |
2,449 | 2,086 | 1,977 | 5.5% | 96.1% | 96.7% | (0.6%) | 14,728 | 14,034 | 4.9% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
New England Average |
7,315 | 2,055 | 1,927 | 6.6% | 95.9% | 96.5% | (0.6%) | 43,273 | 40,817 | 6.0% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Metro NY/NJ |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
New York, NY |
3,099 | 2,865 | 2,716 | 5.5% | 96.1% | 96.2% | (0.1%) | 25,594 | 24,285 | 5.4% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
New Jersey |
2,462 | 1,983 | 1,913 | 3.7% | 96.2% | 95.9% | 0.3% | 14,087 | 13,550 | 4.0% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Long Island, NY |
1,420 | 2,449 | 2,344 | 4.5% | 95.8% | 96.2% | (0.4%) | 9,993 | 9,601 | 4.1% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Metro NY/NJ Average |
6,981 | 2,469 | 2,358 | 4.7% | 96.1% | 96.1% | 0.0% | 49,674 | 47,436 | 4.7% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mid-Atlantic/Midwest |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Washington Metro |
5,349 | 1,879 | 1,782 | 5.4% | 95.3% | 95.9% | (0.6%) | 28,728 | 27,412 | 4.8% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Chicago, IL |
601 | 1,548 | 1,477 | 4.8% | 96.0% | 95.9% | 0.1% | 2,677 | 2,553 | 4.9% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mid-Atlantic/Midwest Average |
5,950 | 1,845 | 1,752 | 5.3% | 95.4% | 95.9% | (0.5%) | 31,405 | 29,965 | 4.8% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pacific Northwest |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Seattle, WA |
2,533 | 1,334 | 1,250 | 6.7% | 94.3% | 94.7% | (0.4%) | 9,553 | 8,985 | 6.3% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pacific Northwest Average |
2,533 | 1,334 | 1,250 | 6.7% | 94.3% | 94.7% | (0.4%) | 9,553 | 8,985 | 6.3% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Northern California |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
San Jose, CA |
2,790 | 2,004 | 1,829 | 9.6% | 94.9% | 95.1% | (0.2%) | 15,921 | 14,559 | 9.4% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Oakland-East Bay, CA |
1,569 | 1,499 | 1,405 | 6.7% | 95.8% | 96.3% | (0.5%) | 6,764 | 6,369 | 6.2% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
San Francisco, CA |
470 | 2,520 | 2,334 | 8.0% | 96.8% | 95.3% | 1.5% | 3,441 | 3,142 | 9.5% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Northern California Average |
4,829 | 1,890 | 1,742 | 8.5% | 95.4% | 95.4% | 0.0% | 26,126 | 24,070 | 8.5% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Southern California |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Los Angeles, CA |
1,911 | 1,715 | 1,640 | 4.6% | 96.2% | 95.7% | 0.5% | 9,456 | 8,993 | 5.1% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Orange County, CA |
1,167 | 1,573 | 1,507 | 4.4% | 95.9% | 94.3% | 1.6% | 5,283 | 4,986 | 6.0% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
San Diego, CA |
925 | 1,614 | 1,542 | 4.7% | 95.8% | 93.5% | 2.3% | 4,292 | 4,013 | 7.0% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Southern California Average |
4,003 | 1,651 | 1,579 | 4.6% | 96.0% | 94.8% | 1.2% | 19,031 | 17,992 | 5.8% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average/Total Established |
31,611 | $ 1,973 | $ 1,863 | 5.9% | 95.7% | 95.8% | (0.1%) | $ 179,062 | $ 169,265 | 5.8% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Established Communities are communities with stabilized occupancy and operating expenses as of January 1, 2010 such that a comparison of 2010 to 2011 is meaningful.
(2) Reflects the effect of concessions amortized over the average lease term.
(3) With concessions reflected on a cash basis, rental revenue from Established Communities increased 5.7% between years.
Attachment 6
AvalonBay Communities, Inc.
*Sequential Quarterly* Revenue and Occupancy Changes - Established Communities
September 30, 2011
Apartment Homes |
Average Rental Rates (1) | Economic Occupancy | Rental Revenue ($000s) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Q3 11 | Q2 11 | % Change | Q3 11 | Q2 11 | % Change | Q3 11 | Q2 11 | % Change | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
New England |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Boston, MA |
4,866 | $ 2,040 | $ 1,975 | 3.3% | 95.9% | 96.1% | (0.2%) | $ 28,545 | $ 27,722 | 3.0% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fairfield-New Haven, CT |
2,449 | 2,086 | 2,020 | 3.3% | 96.1% | 96.8% | (0.7%) | 14,728 | 14,362 | 2.5% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
New England Average |
7,315 | 2,055 | 1,990 | 3.3% | 95.9% | 96.4% | (0.5%) | 43,273 | 42,084 | 2.8% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Metro NY/NJ |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
New York, NY |
3,099 | 2,865 | 2,764 | 3.7% | 96.1% | 96.3% | (0.2%) | 25,594 | 24,737 | 3.5% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
New Jersey |
2,462 | 1,983 | 1,942 | 2.1% | 96.2% | 96.6% | (0.4%) | 14,087 | 13,859 | 1.6% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Long Island, NY |
1,420 | 2,449 | 2,393 | 2.3% | 95.8% | 96.8% | (1.0%) | 9,993 | 9,867 | 1.3% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Metro NY/NJ Average |
6,981 | 2,469 | 2,399 | 2.9% | 96.1% | 96.4% | (0.3%) | 49,674 | 48,463 | 2.5% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mid-Atlantic/Midwest |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Washington Metro |
5,349 | 1,879 | 1,848 | 1.7% | 95.3% | 95.3% | 0.0% | 28,728 | 28,250 | 1.7% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Chicago, IL |
601 | 1,548 | 1,541 | 0.5% | 96.0% | 94.3% | 1.7% | 2,677 | 2,625 | 2.0% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mid-Atlantic/Midwest Average |
5,950 | 1,845 | 1,817 | 1.5% | 95.4% | 95.2% | 0.2% | 31,405 | 30,875 | 1.7% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pacific Northwest |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Seattle, WA |
2,533 | 1,334 | 1,292 | 3.3% | 94.3% | 95.1% | (0.8%) | 9,553 | 9,337 | 2.3% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pacific Northwest Average |
2,533 | 1,334 | 1,292 | 3.3% | 94.3% | 95.1% | (0.8%) | 9,553 | 9,337 | 2.3% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Northern California |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
San Jose, CA |
2,790 | 2,004 | 1,906 | 5.1% | 94.9% | 96.8% | (1.9%) | 15,921 | 15,443 | 3.1% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Oakland-East Bay, CA |
1,569 | 1,499 | 1,453 | 3.2% | 95.8% | 96.2% | (0.4%) | 6,764 | 6,578 | 2.8% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
San Francisco, CA |
470 | 2,520 | 2,431 | 3.7% | 96.8% | 96.6% | 0.2% | 3,441 | 3,311 | 3.9% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Northern California Average |
4,829 | 1,890 | 1,810 | 4.4% | 95.4% | 96.6% | (1.2%) | 26,126 | 25,332 | 3.1% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Southern California |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Los Angeles, CA |
1,911 | 1,715 | 1,683 | 1.9% | 96.2% | 95.6% | 0.6% | 9,456 | 9,224 | 2.5% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Orange County, CA |
1,167 | 1,573 | 1,542 | 2.0% | 95.9% | 96.5% | (0.6%) | 5,283 | 5,209 | 1.4% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
San Diego, CA |
925 | 1,614 | 1,567 | 3.0% | 95.8% | 94.9% | 0.9% | 4,292 | 4,127 | 4.0% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Southern California Average |
4,003 | 1,651 | 1,615 | 2.2% | 96.0% | 95.7% | 0.3% | 19,031 | 18,560 | 2.5% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average/Total Established |
31,611 | $ 1,973 | $ 1,917 | 2.9% | 95.7% | 96.1% | (0.4%) | $ 179,062 | $ 174,651 | 2.5% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Reflects the effect of concessions amortized over the average lease term.
Attachment 7
AvalonBay Communities, Inc.
Year-to-Date Revenue and Occupancy Changes - Established Communities (1)
September 30, 2011
Apartment Homes |
Average Rental Rates (2) | Economic Occupancy | Rental Revenue ($000s) (3) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
YTD 11 |
YTD 10 |
% Change |
YTD 11 |
YTD 10 |
% Change |
YTD 11 |
YTD 10 |
% Change |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
New England |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Boston, MA |
4,866 | $ 1,984 | $ 1,877 | 5.7% | 95.9% | 96.2% | (0.3%) | $ 83,347 | $ 79,084 | 5.4% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fairfield-New Haven, CT |
2,449 | 2,025 | 1,929 | 5.0% | 96.4% | 96.7% | (0.3%) | 43,029 | 41,100 | 4.7% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
New England Average |
7,315 | 1,998 | 1,894 | 5.5% | 96.1% | 96.4% | (0.3%) | 126,376 | 120,184 | 5.2% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Metro NY/NJ |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
New York, NY |
3,099 | 2,791 | 2,674 | 4.4% | 96.1% | 96.3% | (0.2%) | 74,830 | 71,842 | 4.2% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
New Jersey |
2,462 | 1,944 | 1,876 | 3.6% | 96.2% | 96.4% | (0.2%) | 41,447 | 40,086 | 3.4% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Long Island, NY |
1,420 | 2,397 | 2,286 | 4.9% | 96.1% | 96.1% | 0.0% | 29,448 | 28,071 | 4.9% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Metro NY/NJ Average |
6,981 | 2,412 | 2,315 | 4.2% | 96.2% | 96.3% | (0.1%) | 145,725 | 139,999 | 4.1% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mid-Atlantic/Midwest |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Washington Metro |
5,349 | 1,843 | 1,748 | 5.4% | 95.4% | 96.1% | (0.7%) | 84,587 | 80,818 | 4.7% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Chicago, IL |
601 | 1,526 | 1,445 | 5.6% | 95.5% | 96.4% | (0.9%) | 7,891 | 7,534 | 4.7% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mid-Atlantic/Midwest Average |
5,950 | 1,811 | 1,716 | 5.5% | 95.4% | 96.2% | (0.8%) | 92,478 | 88,352 | 4.7% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pacific Northwest |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Seattle, WA |
2,533 | 1,295 | 1,236 | 4.8% | 94.9% | 95.6% | (0.7%) | 28,012 | 26,898 | 4.1% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pacific Northwest Average |
2,533 | 1,295 | 1,236 | 4.8% | 94.9% | 95.6% | (0.7%) | 28,012 | 26,898 | 4.1% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Northern California |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
San Jose, CA |
2,790 | 1,922 | 1,805 | 6.5% | 96.1% | 96.0% | 0.1% | 46,385 | 43,529 | 6.6% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Oakland-East Bay, CA |
1,569 | 1,459 | 1,388 | 5.1% | 96.1% | 95.7% | 0.4% | 19,800 | 18,762 | 5.5% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
San Francisco, CA |
470 | 2,447 | 2,308 | 6.0% | 96.4% | 96.2% | 0.2% | 9,976 | 9,396 | 6.2% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Northern California Average |
4,829 | 1,823 | 1,718 | 6.1% | 96.1% | 96.0% | 0.1% | 76,161 | 71,687 | 6.2% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Southern California |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Los Angeles, CA |
1,911 | 1,684 | 1,632 | 3.2% | 96.2% | 95.7% | 0.5% | 27,860 | 26,878 | 3.7% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Orange County, CA |
1,167 | 1,540 | 1,512 | 1.9% | 96.2% | 94.9% | 1.3% | 15,569 | 15,086 | 3.2% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
San Diego, CA |
925 | 1,573 | 1,544 | 1.9% | 95.9% | 94.7% | 1.2% | 12,550 | 12,177 | 3.1% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Southern California Average |
4,003 | 1,617 | 1,578 | 2.5% | 96.1% | 95.2% | 0.9% | 55,979 | 54,141 | 3.4% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average/Total Established |
31,611 | $ 1,923 | $ 1,834 | 4.9% | 95.9% | 96.1% | (0.2%) | $ 524,731 | $ 501,261 | 4.7% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Established Communities are communities with stabilized operating expenses as of January 1, 2010 such that a comparison of 2010 to 2011 is meaningful.
(2) Reflects the effect of concessions amortized over the average lease term.
(3) With concessions reflected on a cash basis, rental revenue from Established Communities increased 4.4% between years.
Attachment 8
AvalonBay Communities, Inc.
Operating Expenses (Opex) - Established Communities (1)
September 30, 2011
(Dollars in thousands)
(unaudited)
Q3 2011 |
Q3 2010 |
% Change |
Q3 2011 % of Total Opex |
YTD 2011 |
YTD 2010 |
% Change |
YTD 2011 % of Total Opex |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Property taxes (2) |
$ 17,463 | $ 17,597 | (0.8%) | 29.8% | $ 53,287 | $ 53,374 | (0.2%) | 31.2% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Payroll (3) |
13,156 | 12,980 | 1.4% | 22.4% | 38,944 | 37,756 | 3.1% | 22.8% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Repairs & maintenance |
11,556 | 11,468 | 0.8% | 19.7% | 30,435 | 30,729 | (1.0%) | 17.8% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Office operations (4) |
5,374 | 5,613 | (4.3%) | 9.2% | 15,740 | 17,310 | (9.1%) | 9.2% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Utilities (5) |
6,574 | 6,963 | (5.6%) | 11.2% | 19,348 | 20,339 | (4.9%) | 11.3% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Land lease expense (6) |
1,237 | 1,296 | (4.6%) | 2.1% | 3,679 | 3,890 | (5.4%) | 2.2% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Marketing (7) |
1,857 | 1,957 | (5.1%) | 3.2% | 5,018 | 5,506 | (8.9%) | 2.9% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Insurance (8) |
1,389 | 1,272 | 9.2% | 2.4% | 4,384 | 3,942 | 11.2% | 2.6% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Established Communities |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Operating Expenses (9) |
$ 58,606 | $ 59,146 | (0.9%) | 100.0% | $ 170,835 | $ 172,846 | (1.2%) | 100.0% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) See Attachment #14 - Definitions and Reconciliations of Non-GAAP Financial Measures and Other Terms.
(2) Property taxes decreased for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 due primarily to refunds from successful appeals received in 2011.
(3) Payroll includes expenses directly related to on-site operations. The increase for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 from the prior period is due primarily to the impact of increased employee benefit costs. An increase in employee bonuses also contributed to the increase for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 over the prior year period.
(4) Office operations includes administrative costs, bad debt expense and association and license fees. The decreases for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 from the prior year periods are due primarily to a decrease in bad debt expense.
(5) Utilities represents aggregate utility costs, net of resident reimbursements. The decreases for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 from the prior year periods are due primarily to increased receipts from water submetering and lower electrical expense with lower gas expense also contributing to the year to date decrease.
(6) Land lease expense represents GAAP-based rental expense, which is higher than actual cash payments made. Expensed land lease payments were $851 and $2,522 higher than cash payments for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011. Established Communities results exclude land lease expense for operating communities classified as Held for Sale.
(7) Marketing costs represent amounts incurred for electronic and print advertising, as well as prospect management and incentive costs. The decreases for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 are driven by a decrease in print advertising and more favorable terms for internet advertising.
(8) Insurance costs consist of premiums, expected claims activity and associated reductions from receipt of claims proceeds. Changes between years consist of deposits for insurance settlements received in 2010 not present in 2011 and expected claims adjustments. Insurance costs can exhibit volatility due to the amounts and timing of estimated and actual claim activity and the related proceeds received.
(9) Operating expenses for Established Communities excludes indirect costs for off-site corporate level property management related expenses, and other support related expenses.
Attachment 9
AvalonBay Communities, Inc.
Development Communities as of September 30, 2011
Schedule | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
% Occ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
# of Apt Homes |
Total Capital Cost (1) (millions) |
Start | Initial Occupancy |
Complete | Stabilized Ops (1) |
Avg Rent Per Home (1) |
% Comp (2) |
% Leased (3) |
Physical (4) |
Economic (1) (5) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Inclusive of Concessions See Attachment |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Under Construction: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1. Avalon Rockville Centre |
349 | $ 109.7 | Q1 2010 | Q2 2011 | Q3 2012 | Q1 2013 | $ 2,630 | 54.4% | 53.3% | 47.0% | 22.9% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Rockville Centre, NY |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2. Avalon Queen Anne |
203 | 55.6 | Q3 2010 | Q4 2011 | Q2 2012 | Q4 2012 | 1,925 | 16.7% | 3.9% | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Seattle, WA |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3. Avalon Green II |
444 | 107.8 | Q3 2010 | Q3 2011 | Q1 2013 | Q3 2013 | 2,525 | 13.5% | 14.4% | 9.9% | 1.9% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Greenburgh, NY |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4. Avalon Cohasset |
220 | 53.1 | Q4 2010 | Q3 2011 | Q2 2012 | Q4 2012 | 1,970 | 39.1% | 24.5% | 15.9% | 5.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Cohasset, MA |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5. Avalon Ocean Avenue |
173 | 61.1 | Q4 2010 | Q2 2012 | Q4 2012 | Q2 2013 | 2,485 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||||||||||||
San Francisco, CA |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6. Avalon North Bergen |
164 | 44.0 | Q4 2010 | Q3 2012 | Q3 2012 | Q1 2013 | 1,975 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||||||||||||
North Bergen, NJ |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7. Avalon at Wesmont Station I |
266 | 62.5 | Q4 2010 | Q2 2012 | Q1 2013 | Q3 2013 | 1,955 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Wood-Ridge, NJ |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
8. Avalon Park Crest |
354 | 77.6 | Q4 2010 | Q2 2012 | Q2 2013 | Q4 2013 | 1,910 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Tysons Corner, VA |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9. Avalon Garden City |
204 | 68.0 | Q2 2011 | Q1 2012 | Q4 2012 | Q2 2013 | 3,085 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Garden City, NY |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
10. Avalon Andover |
115 | 26.8 | Q2 2011 | Q2 2012 | Q3 2012 | Q1 2013 | 1,850 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Andover, MA |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
11. Avalon Exeter |
187 | 114.0 | Q2 2011 | Q3 2013 | Q4 2013 | Q2 2014 | 4,335 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Boston, MA |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
12. Avalon Irvine II |
179 | 46.2 | Q3 2011 | Q1 2013 | Q2 2013 | Q4 2013 | 1,840 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Irvine, CA |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
13. Avalon Ballard |
265 | 68.8 | Q3 2011 | Q2 2013 | Q3 2013 | Q1 2014 | 1,715 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Seattle, WA |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
14. Avalon Shelton III |
251 | 47.9 | Q3 2011 | Q1 2013 | Q3 2013 | Q1 2014 | 1,745 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Shelton, CT |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15. Avalon Hackensack |
226 | 47.2 | Q3 2011 | Q2 2013 | Q4 2013 | Q2 2014 | 2,555 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Hackensack, NJ |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subtotal/Weighted Average |
3,600 | $ 990.3 | $ 2,295 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Completed this Quarter: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1. Avalon Springs II |
100 | $ 31.0 | Q3 2010 | Q2 2011 | Q3 2011 | Q1 2012 | $ 2,370 | 100.0% | 79.0% | 76.0% | 49.3% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Wilton, CT |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2. Avalon Brandemoor II |
82 | 14.1 | Q3 2010 | Q2 2011 | Q3 2011 | Q1 2012 | 1,690 | 100.0% | 96.3% | 95.1% | 59.8% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Lynnwood, WA |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subtotal/Weighted Average |
182 | $ 45.1 | $ 2,065 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total/Weighted Average |
3,782 | $ 1,035.4 | $ 2,285 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted Average Projected NOI as a % of Total Capital Cost (1) (6) |
7.0% | Inclusive of Concessions - See Attachment #14 |
(1) | See Attachment #14 - Definitions and Reconciliations of Non-GAAP Financial Measures and Other Terms. |
(2) | Includes apartment homes for which construction has been completed and accepted by management as of October 21, 2011. |
(3) | Includes apartment homes for which leases have been executed or non-refundable deposits have been paid as of October 21, 2011. |
(4) | Physical occupancy based on apartment homes occupied as of October 21, 2011. |
(5) | Represents Economic Occupancy for the third quarter of 2011. |
(6) | The Weighted Average calculation is based on the Companys pro rata share of the Total Capital Cost for each community. |
(7) | Represents Development Communities completed in prior quarters that had not achieved Stabilized Operations for the entire current quarter. Estimates are based on the Companys pro rata share of the Total Capital Cost for each community. |
This chart contains forward-looking statements. Please see the paragraph regarding forward-looking statements on the Table of Contents page relating to the Companys Supplemental Operating and Financial Data for the third quarter of 2011.
Attachment 10
AvalonBay Communities, Inc.
Redevelopment Communities as of September 30, 2011
Cost (millions) | Schedule | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
#
of Apt Homes |
Pre- Redevelopment Capital Cost |
Total Capital Cost (1)(2) |
Acquisition / Completion |
Start | Complete | Restabilized Ops (2) |
Avg Rent Per |
Homes Completed @ 9/30/2011 |
||||||||||||||||||
Inclusive of | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Concessions | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
See Attachment #14 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Under Redevelopment: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1. Avalon at South Coast |
258 | $ 26.0 | $ 33.8 | Q3 1996 | Q4 2010 | Q4 2011 | Q2 2012 | $ 1,500 | 230 | |||||||||||||||||
Costa Mesa, CA |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2. Crowne Ridge |
254 | 33.1 | 46.8 | Q3 1996 | Q4 2010 | Q2 2012 | Q4 2012 | 1,765 | 184 | |||||||||||||||||
San Rafael, CA |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3. Avalon Cove |
504 | 93.7 | 113.9 | Q1 1997 | Q4 2010 | Q3 2012 | Q1 2013 | 3,050 | 331 | |||||||||||||||||
Jersey City, NJ |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4. Avalon Sunset Towers |
243 | 28.9 | 42.0 | Q2 1996 | Q4 2010 | Q3 2013 | Q1 2014 | 2,480 | 77 | |||||||||||||||||
San Francisco, CA |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5. Avalon at Nob Hill |
185 | 28.3 | 34.1 | Q4 1995 | Q2 2011 | Q4 2011 | Q2 2012 | 2,155 | 185 | |||||||||||||||||
San Francisco, CA |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6. Avalon Foster City |
288 | 44.2 | 51.4 | Q1 1994 | Q3 2011 | Q4 2012 | Q2 2013 | 1,925 | - | |||||||||||||||||
Foster City, CA |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7. Avalon at Ballston - Washington Towers |
344 | 39.2 | 53.1 | Q4 1993 | Q3 2011 | Q1 2013 | Q3 2013 | 2,225 | - | |||||||||||||||||
Arlington, VA |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
8. Avalon at Santa Margarita (3) |
301 | 25.0 | 32.3 | Q2 1997 | Q3 2011 | Q1 2013 | Q3 2013 | 1,510 | - | |||||||||||||||||
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Subtotal/Weighted Average |
2,377 | $ 318.4 | $ 407.4 | $ 2,165 | 1,007 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Completed this Quarter: (4) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1. Avalon Pleasanton |
456 | $63.0 | $79.5 | Q1 1994 | Q2 2009 | Q3 2011 | Q1 2012 | $1,590 | 456 | |||||||||||||||||
Pleasanton, CA |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2. Avalon Princeton Junction |
512 | 30.2 | 48.7 | Q4 1988 | Q2 2009 | Q3 2011 | Q4 2011 | 1,555 | 512 | |||||||||||||||||
West Windsor, NJ |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3. Avalon Commons |
312 | 34.1 | 38.1 | Q4 1997 | Q4 2010 | Q3 2011 | Q4 2011 | 2,255 | 312 | |||||||||||||||||
Smithtown, NY |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Subtotal/Weighted Average |
1,280 | $ 127.3 | $ 166.3 | $ 1,740 | 1,280 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Total/Weighted Average |
3,657 | $ 445.7 | $ 573.7 | $ 2,015 | 2,287 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Inclusive of acquisition cost.
(2) See Attachment #14 - Definitions and Reconciliations of Non-GAAP Financial Measures and Other Terms.
(3) The scope of the work completed during the third quarter did not impact economic occupancy or rental income therefore this community is included in the Established Community portfolio.
(4) During the third quarter of 2011 the Company completed the redevelopment of Avalon at Prudential Center in Boston, MA for an estimated Total Capital Cost of $25.5 million. The redevelopment is primarily focused on the exterior and/or common area and is not expected to have a material impact on community operations, including occupancy, or the expected future level of rental revenue. This community is therefore included in the Established Community portfolio and not classified as a Redevelopment Community.
This chart contains forward-looking statements. Please see the paragraph regarding forward-looking statements on the Table of Contents page relating to the Companys Supplemental Operating and Financial Data for the third quarter of 2011.
Attachment 11
AvalonBay Communities, Inc.
Summary of Development and Redevelopment Community Activity (1) as of September 30, 2011
(Dollars in Thousands)
DEVELOPMENT (2) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Apt Homes Completed & Occupied |
Total Capital Cost Invested During Period (3) |
Cost of Homes Completed & Occupied (4) |
Remaining to Invest (5) |
Construction
in Period End (6) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total - 2009 Actual |
2,493 | $ | 451,372 | $ | 809,384 | $ | 245,046 | $ | 500,671 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
2010 Actual: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Quarter 1 |
279 | $ | 122,151 | $ | 101,286 | $ | 228,620 | $ | 552,899 | |||||||||||||||||||
Quarter 2 |
475 | 63,860 | 160,070 | 164,050 | 475,275 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Quarter 3 |
511 | 98,774 | 169,856 | 292,611 | 383,115 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Quarter 4 |
465 | 120,125 | 146,947 | 466,991 | 296,292 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total - 2010 Actual |
1,730 | $ | 404,910 | $ | 578,159 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
2011 Projected: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Quarter 1 (Actual) |
281 | $ | 78,278 | $ | 84,438 | $ | 386,632 | $ | 306,219 | |||||||||||||||||||
Quarter 2 (Actual) |
258 | 113,717 | 69,253 | 468,451 | 377,363 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Quarter 3 (Actual) |
308 | 144,618 | 82,273 | 524,361 | 462,230 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Quarter 4 (Projected) |
270 | 114,219 | 69,913 | 410,142 | 459,620 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total - 2011 Projected |
1,117 | $ | 450,832 | $ | 305,877 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
REDEVELOPMENT | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Capital Cost
Invested |
Remaining to Invest (5) |
Reconstruction in Progress at Period End |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total - 2009 Actual |
$ | 50,911 | $ | 49,527 | $ | 30,628 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2010 Actual: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Quarter 1 |
$ | 12,654 | $ | 36,873 | $ | 27,915 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Quarter 2 |
10,843 | 34,445 | 16,881 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Quarter 3 |
8,870 | 33,046 | 19,606 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Quarter 4 |
15,321 | 73,518 | 13,412 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total - 2010 Actual |
$ | 47,688 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2011 Projected: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Quarter 1 (Actual) |
$ | 12,657 | $ | 59,144 | $ | 24,024 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Quarter 2 (Actual) |
22,297 | 41,396 | 21,950 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Quarter 3 (Actual) |
18,146 | 47,907 | 20,777 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Quarter 4 (Projected) |
13,268 | 34,639 | 20,977 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total - 2011 Projected |
$ | 66,368 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
(1) | Data is presented for all communities currently under development or redevelopment. |
(2) | Projected periods include data for consolidated joint ventures at 100%. The offset for joint venture partners participation is reflected as redeemable noncontrolling interest. |
(3) | Represents Total Capital Cost incurred or expected to be incurred during the quarter, year or in total. See Attachment #14 - Definitions and Reconciliations of Non-GAAP Financial Measures and Other Terms. |
(4) | Represents projected Total Capital Cost of apartment homes completed and occupied during the quarter. Calculated by dividing Total Capital Cost for each Development Community by number of homes for the community, multiplied by the number of homes completed and occupied during the quarter. |
(5) | Represents projected Total Capital Cost remaining to invest on communities currently under construction or reconstruction. |
(6) | Includes communities under development and Established Communities. |
This chart contains forward-looking statements. Please see the paragraph regarding forward-looking statements on the Table of Contents page relating to the Companys Supplemental Operating and Financial Data for the third quarter of 2011.
Attachment 12
AvalonBay Communities, Inc.
Future Development as of September 30, 2011
DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (1) | ||||||||||||||||||
Market | # of Rights | Estimated Number of Homes |
Total Capital Cost (1) (2) |
|||||||||||||||
Boston, MA |
4 | 1,410 | $ 394 | |||||||||||||||
Fairfield-New Haven, CT |
3 | 530 | 108 | |||||||||||||||
New York, NY |
3 | 1,744 | 771 | |||||||||||||||
New Jersey |
8 | 1,998 | 418 | |||||||||||||||
Long Island, NY |
1 | 303 | 75 | |||||||||||||||
Washington, DC Metro |
4 | 1,246 | 309 | |||||||||||||||
Seattle, WA |
1 | 284 | 81 | |||||||||||||||
Oakland-East Bay, CA |
2 | 505 | 143 | |||||||||||||||
San Francisco, CA |
2 | 455 | 212 | |||||||||||||||
San Diego, CA |
1 | 204 | 51 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
Total |
29 | 8,679 | $2,562 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
(1) | See Attachment #14 - Definitions and Reconciliations of Non-GAAP Financial Measures and Other Terms. |
(2) | The Company currently owns $205 million of land related to 13 of 29 development rights, and is currently under a ground lease obligation for one development right in New York, NY. |
This chart contains forward-looking statements. Please see the paragraph regarding forward-looking statements on the Table of Contents page relating to the Companys Supplemental Operating and Financial Data for the third quarter of 2011.
Attachment 13
AvalonBay Communities, Inc.
Summary of Disposition Activity (1) as of September 30, 2011
(Dollars in thousands)
Number of Communities Sold (2) |
Gross Sales Price |
GAAP Gain |
Accumulated Depreciation and Other |
Economic Gain/Loss (4) |
Weighted Average Initial Year Mkt. Cap Rate (3) (4) |
Weighted Average Unleveraged IRR (3) (4) |
||||||||||||||||
1998: |
||||||||||||||||||||||
9 Communities |
$ | 170,312 | $ | 25,270 | $ | 23,438 | $ | 1,832 | 8.1% | 16.2% | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
1999: |
||||||||||||||||||||||
16 Communities |
$ | 317,712 | $ | 47,093 | $ | 27,150 | $ | 19,943 | 8.3% | 12.1% | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
2000: |
||||||||||||||||||||||
8 Communities |
$ | 160,085 | $ | 40,779 | $ | 6,262 | $ | 34,517 | 7.9% | 15.3% | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
2001: |
||||||||||||||||||||||
7 Communities |
$ | 241,130 | $ | 62,852 | $ | 21,623 | $ | 41,229 | 8.0% | 14.3% | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
2002: |
||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Community |
$ | 80,100 | $ | 48,893 | $ | 7,462 | $ | 41,431 | 5.4% | 20.1% | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
2003: |
||||||||||||||||||||||
12 Communities, 1 Land Parcel (5) |
$ | 460,600 | $ | 184,438 | $ | 52,613 | $ | 131,825 | 6.3% | 15.3% | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
2004: |
||||||||||||||||||||||
5 Communities, 1 Land Parcel |
$ | 250,977 | $ | 122,425 | $ | 19,320 | $ | 103,105 | 4.8% | 16.8% | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
2005: |
||||||||||||||||||||||
7 Communities, 1 Office Building, |
||||||||||||||||||||||
3 Land Parcels (6) |
$ | 382,720 | $ | 199,767 | $ | 14,929 | $ | 184,838 | 3.8% | 18.0% | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
2006: |
||||||||||||||||||||||
4 Communities, 3 Land Parcels (7) |
$ | 281,485 | $ | 117,539 | $ | 21,699 | $ | 95,840 | 4.6% | 15.2% | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
2007: |
||||||||||||||||||||||
5 Communities, 1 Land Parcel (8) |
$ | 273,896 | $ | 163,352 | $ | 17,588 | $ | 145,764 | 4.6% | 17.8% | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
2008: |
||||||||||||||||||||||
11 Communities (9) |
$ | 646,200 | $ | 288,384 | $ | 56,469 | $ | 231,915 | 5.1% | 14.1% | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
2009: |
||||||||||||||||||||||
5 Communities, 2 Land Parcels (10) |
$ | 193,186 | $ | 68,717 | $ | 16,692 | $ | 52,025 | 6.5% | 13.0% | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
2010: |
||||||||||||||||||||||
3 Communities, 1 Office Building (10) |
$ | 198,600 | $ | 74,074 | $ | 51,977 | $ | 22,097 | 5.8% | 8.9% | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
2011: |
||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Community, 3 Land Parcels (11) |
$ | 67,575 | $ | 15,460 | $ | 20,892 | $ | (5,432) | 3.9% | 9.3% | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
1998 - 2011 Total |
$ | 3,724,578 | $ | 1,459,043 | $ | 358,114 | $ | 1,100,929 | 5.8% | 15.0% | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) | Activity excludes dispositions to joint venture entities in which the Company retains an economic interest. |
(2) | For dispositions from January 1, 1998 through September 30, 2011 the Weighted Average Holding Period is 7.9 years. |
(3) | For purposes of this attachment, land sales and the disposition of an office building are not included in the calculation of Weighted Average Holding Period, Weighted Average Initial Year Market Cap Rate, or Weighted Average Unleveraged IRR. |
(4) | See Attachment #14 - Definitions and Reconciliations of Non-GAAP Financial Measures and Other Terms. |
(5) | 2003 GAAP gain, for purposes of this attachment, includes $23,448 related to the sale of a community in which the Company held a 50% membership interest. |
(6) | 2005 GAAP gain includes the recovery of an impairment loss of $3,000 recorded in 2002 related to one of the land parcels sold in 2005. This loss was recorded to reflect the land at fair value based on its entitlement status at the time it was determined to be planned for disposition. |
(7) | 2006 GAAP gain, for purposes of this attachment, includes $6,609 related to the sale of a community in which the Company held a 25% equity interest. |
(8) | 2007 GAAP gain, for purposes of this attachment, includes $56,320 related to the sale of a partnership interest in which the Company held a 50% equity interest. |
(9) | 2008 GAAP gain, for purposes of this attachment, includes $3,483 related to the sale of a community held by Fund I in which the Company holds a 15.2% equity interest. |
(10) | 2009 and 2010 GAAP and Economic Gain include the recognition of approximately $2,770 and $2,675, respectively, in deferred gains for prior year dispositions, recognition of which occurred in conjunction with settlement of associated legal matters. |
(11) | 2011 results exclude the Companys proportionate gain of $7,675 associated with an asset exchange. 2011 GAAP gain, for purposes of this attachment, includes $1,743 related to the sale of a |
community held by Fund I in which the Company holds a 15.2% equity interest. 2011 Accumulated Depreciation and Other includes $20,210 in impairment charges on two of the land parcels sold. |
Attachment 14
AvalonBay Communities, Inc
Definitions and Reconciliations of Non-GAAP Financial Measures and Other Terms
This release, including its attachments, contains certain non-GAAP financial measures and other terms. The definition and calculation of these non-GAAP financial measures and other terms may differ from the definitions and methodologies used by other REITs and, accordingly, may not be comparable. The non-GAAP financial measures referred to below should not be considered an alternative to net income as an indication of our performance. In addition, these non-GAAP financial measures do not represent cash generated from operating activities in accordance with GAAP and therefore should not be considered as an alternative measure of liquidity or as indicative of cash available to fund cash needs.
FFO is determined based on a definition adopted by the Board of Governors of the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (NAREIT). FFO is calculated by the Company as Net income or loss attributable to common stockholders computed in accordance with GAAP, adjusted for gains or losses on sales of previously depreciated operating communities, extraordinary gains or losses (as defined by GAAP), cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle and depreciation of real estate assets, including adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. Management generally considers FFO to be an appropriate supplemental measure of operating performance because, by excluding gains or losses related to dispositions of previously depreciated operating communities and excluding real estate depreciation (which can vary among owners of identical assets in similar condition based on historical cost accounting and useful life estimates), FFO can help one compare the operating performance of a companys real estate between periods or as compared to different companies. A reconciliation of FFO to Net income attributable to common stockholders is as follows (dollars in thousands):
Q3
2011 |
Q3
2010 |
YTD
2011 |
YTD
2010 |
|||||||||||||
Net income attributable to common stockholders |
$ | 44,824 | $ | 24,654 | $ | 118,537 | $ | 148,304 | ||||||||
Depreciation - real estate assets, including discontinued operations and joint venture adjustments |
64,499 | 59,794 | 191,933 | 175,399 | ||||||||||||
Distributions to noncontrolling interests, including discontinued operations |
7 | 14 | 20 | 41 | ||||||||||||
Gain on sale of unconsolidated entities holding previously depreciated real estate assets |
(1,743) | -- | (1,743) | -- | ||||||||||||
Gain on sale of previously depreciated real estate assets |
-- | -- | (7,675) | (72,220) | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
FFO attributable to common stockholders |
$ | 107,587 | $ | 84,462 | $ | 301,072 | $ | 251,524 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Average shares outstanding - diluted |
92,340,368 | 85,768,696 | 89,199,498 | 84,129,894 | ||||||||||||
Earnings per share - diluted |
$ | 0.49 | $ | 0.29 | $ | 1.33 | $ | 1.76 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
FFO per common share - diluted |
$ | 1.17 | $ | 0.98 | $ | 3.38 | $ | 2.99 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attachment 14
The Companys results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and the comparable prior year periods include the non-routine items outlined in the following table:
Non-Routine Items | ||||||||
Decrease (Increase) in Net Income and FFO | ||||||||
(dollars in thousands) |
YTD 2010 |
YTD 2011 |
Q3 2010 |
Q3 2011 |
|||||||||||||
Land impairments (1) |
$ | - | $ | 14,052 | - | $ | 14,052 | |||||||||
Gain on sale of land |
- | (13,716) | - | (13,716) | ||||||||||||
Interest income on escrow |
- | (2,478) | - | - | ||||||||||||
Severance and related costs |
(1,550) | (400) | - | - | ||||||||||||
Legal settlement proceeds, net |
(927) | - | - | - | ||||||||||||
Severe weather costs |
672 | - | - | - | ||||||||||||
Excise tax |
30 | - | - | - | ||||||||||||
Acquisition costs |
- | 1,010 | - | 51 | ||||||||||||
Investment Management Fund transaction costs, net (2) |
636 | 446 | 416 | 75 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total non-routine items |
$ | (1,139) | $ | (1,086) | $ | 416 | $ | 462 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Weighted Average Dilutive |
||||||||||||||||
Shares Outstanding |
84,129,894 | 89,199,498 | 85,768,696 | 92,340,368 | ||||||||||||
(1) Includes an impairment charge recognized for an unconsolidated joint venture. | ||||||||||||||||
(2) Represents the Companys proportional share of Fund II transaction costs. |
Projected FFO, as provided within this release in the Companys outlook, is calculated on a basis consistent with historical FFO, and is therefore considered to be an appropriate supplemental measure to projected Net Income from projected operating performance. A reconciliation of the range provided for Projected FFO per share (diluted) for the fourth quarter and full year 2011 to the ranges provided for projected EPS (diluted) is as follows:
|
|
Low Range |
High Range |
|||||||
Projected EPS (diluted) - Q4 2011 |
$ 0.54 | $ 0.58 | ||||||
Projected depreciation (real estate related) |
0.65 | 0.65 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Projected FFO per share (diluted) - Q4 2011 |
$ 1.19 | $ 1.23 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Projected EPS (diluted) - Full Year 2011 |
$ 1.84 | $ 1.88 | ||||||
Projected depreciation (real estate related) |
2.81 | 2.81 | ||||||
Projected gain on sale of operating communities |
(0.08) | (0.08) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Projected FFO per share (diluted) - Full Year 2011 |
$ 4.57 | $ 4.61 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOI is defined by the Company as total property revenue less direct property operating expenses (including property taxes), and excludes corporate-level income (including management, development and other fees), corporate-level property management and other indirect operating expenses, investments and investment management expenses, expensed development and other pursuit costs, net interest expense, gain (loss) on extinguishment of debt, general and administrative expense, joint venture income (loss), depreciation expense, impairment loss on land holdings,
Attachment 14
gain on sale of real estate assets and income from discontinued operations. The Company considers NOI to be an appropriate supplemental measure to Net Income of operating performance of a community or communities because it helps both investors and management to understand the core operations of a community or communities prior to the allocation of corporate-level property management overhead or general and administrative costs. This is more reflective of the operating performance of a community, and allows for an easier comparison of the operating performance of single assets or groups of assets. In addition, because prospective buyers of real estate have different overhead structures, with varying marginal impact to overhead by acquiring real estate, NOI is considered by many in the real estate industry to be a useful measure for determining the value of a real estate asset or groups of assets.
A reconciliation of NOI (from continuing operations) to Net Income, as well as a breakdown of NOI by operating segment, is as follows (dollars in thousands):
Q3 | Q3 | Q2 | Q1 | Q4 | YTD | YTD | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Income |
$ 44,677 | $ 23,980 | $ 43,192 | $ 30,537 | $ 26,668 | $ 118,405 | $ 147,414 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Indirect operating expenses, net of corporate income |
7,734 | 7,189 | 7,701 | 7,027 | 7,978 | 22,463 | 22,269 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Investments and investment management expense |
1,328 | 1,026 | 1,341 | 1,191 | 712 | 3,860 | 3,111 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Expensed development and other pursuit costs |
633 | 737 | 1,353 | 651 | 1,057 | 2,636 | 1,685 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense, net |
43,970 | 44,262 | 45,855 | 44,271 | 46,948 | 134,096 | 128,260 | |||||||||||||||||||||
General and administrative expense |
6,087 | 7,039 | 8,145 | 7,292 | 6,870 | 21,524 | 19,975 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Joint venture loss (income) |
(2,615) | 325 | (395) | (503) | (397) | (3,513) | (364) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation expense |
62,262 | 57,926 | 62,215 | 60,594 | 59,909 | 185,071 | 169,819 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Gain on sale of real estate assets |
(13,716) | -- | (7,675) | -- | (1,854) | (21,391) | (72,220) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Impairment loss |
14,052 | -- | -- | -- | -- | 14,052 | -- | |||||||||||||||||||||
(Income) loss from discontinued operations |
1,808 | 2,232 | 1,911 | 2,019 | 1,982 | 5,737 | 4,387 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
NOI from continuing operations |
$ 166,220 | $ 144,716 | $ 163,643 | $ 153,079 | $ 149,873 | $ 482,940 | $ 424,336 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Established: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
New England |
$ 27,560 | $ 25,369 | $ 27,006 | $ 25,482 | $ 25,839 | $ 80,048 | $ 73,700 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Metro NY/NJ |
33,707 | 30,648 | 33,153 | 31,559 | 31,745 | 98,420 | 91,728 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Mid-Atlantic/Midwest |
22,055 | 20,794 | 22,404 | 21,643 | 21,760 | 66,102 | 61,903 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Pacific NW |
6,120 | 5,713 | 6,349 | 6,140 | 5,796 | 18,609 | 17,768 | |||||||||||||||||||||
No. California |
18,399 | 16,560 | 18,182 | 17,386 | 16,179 | 53,967 | 49,380 | |||||||||||||||||||||
So. California |
12,699 | 11,226 | 12,393 | 11,955 | 11,522 | 37,047 | 34,365 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Total Established |
120,540 | 110,310 | 119,487 | 114,165 | 112,841 | 354,193 | 328,844 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Other Stabilized |
23,309 | 18,181 | 22,274 | 20,025 | 19,830 | 65,604 | 48,544 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Development/Redevelopment |
22,371 | 16,225 | 21,882 | 18,889 | 17,202 | 63,143 | 46,948 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
NOI from continuing operations |
$ 166,220 | $ 144,716 | $ 163,643 | $ 153,079 | $ 149,873 | $ 482,940 | $ 424,336 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attachment 14
NOI as reported by the Company does not include the operating results from discontinued operations (i.e., assets sold during the period January 1, 2010 through September 30, 2011 or classified as held for sale at September 30, 2011). A reconciliation of NOI from communities sold or classified as discontinued operations to Net Income for these communities is as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
Q3 2011 |
Q3 2010 |
YTD 2011 |
YTD 2010 |
|||||||||||||
Income (Loss) from discontinued operations |
$ | (1,808) | $ | (2,232) | $ | (5,737) | $ | (4,387) | ||||||||
Depreciation expense |
474 | 827 | 1,884 | 2,508 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
NOI from discontinued operations |
$ | (1,334) | $ | (1,405) | $ | (3,853) | $ | (1,879) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
NOI from assets sold |
-- | 27 | -- | 2,287 | ||||||||||||
NOI from assets held for sale |
(1,334) | (1,432) | (3,853) | (4,166) | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
NOI from discontinued operations |
$ | (1,334) | $ | (1,405) | $ | (3,853) | $ | (1,879) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projected NOI, as used within this release for certain Development Communities and in calculating the Initial Year Market Cap Rate for dispositions, represents managements estimate, as of the date of this release (or as of the date of the buyers valuation in the case of dispositions), of projected stabilized rental revenue minus projected stabilized operating expenses. For Development Communities, Projected NOI is calculated based on the first twelve months of Stabilized Operations, as defined below, following the completion of construction. In calculating the Initial Year Market Cap Rate, Projected NOI for dispositions is calculated for the first twelve months following the date of the buyers valuation. Projected stabilized rental revenue represents managements estimate of projected gross potential minus projected stabilized economic vacancy and adjusted for projected stabilized concessions plus projected stabilized other rental revenue. Projected stabilized operating expenses do not include interest, income taxes (if any), depreciation or amortization, or any allocation of corporate-level property management overhead or general and administrative costs. Projected gross potential for Development Communities and dispositions is based on leased rents for occupied homes and managements best estimate of rental levels for homes which are currently unleased, as well as those homes which will become available for lease during the twelve month forward period used to develop Projected NOI. The weighted average Projected NOI as a percentage of Total Capital Cost is weighted based on the Companys share of the Total Capital Cost of each community, based on its percentage ownership.
Management believes that Projected NOI of the Development Communities, on an aggregated weighted average basis, assists investors in understanding managements estimate of the likely impact on operations of the Development Communities when the assets are complete and achieve stabilized occupancy (before allocation of any corporate-level property management overhead, general and administrative costs or interest expense). However, in this release the Company has not given a projection of NOI on a company-wide basis. Given the different dates and fiscal years for which NOI is projected for these communities, the projected allocation of corporate-level property management overhead, general and administrative costs and interest expense to communities under development is complex, impractical to develop, and may not be meaningful. Projected NOI of these communities is not a projection of the Companys overall financial performance or cash flow. There can be no assurance that the communities under development or redevelopment will achieve the Projected NOI as described in this release.
Rental Revenue with Concessions on a Cash Basis is considered by the Company to be a supplemental measure to rental revenue in conformity with GAAP to help investors evaluate the impact of both current and historical concessions on GAAP-based rental revenue and to more readily enable comparisons to revenue as reported by other companies. In addition, rental revenue (with concessions on a cash basis) allows an investor to understand the historical trend in cash concessions.
Attachment 14
A reconciliation of rental revenue from Established Communities in conformity with GAAP to rental revenue (with concessions on a cash basis) is as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
Q3 2011 |
Q3 2010 |
YTD 2011 |
YTD 2010 |
|||||||||||||
Rental revenue (GAAP basis) |
$ | 179,062 | $ | 169,265 | $ | 524,731 | $ | 501,261 | ||||||||
Concessions amortized |
257 | 1,021 | 1,244 | 4,703 | ||||||||||||
Concessions granted |
(99) | (751) | (416) | (2,461) | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Rental revenue (with concessions on a cash basis) |
$ | 179,220 | $ | 169,535 | $ | 525,559 | $ | 503,503 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
% change -- GAAP revenue |
5.8% | 4.7% | ||||||||||||||
% change -- cash revenue |
5.7% | 4.4% |
|
|
Economic Gain (Loss) is calculated by the Company as the gain (loss) on sale in accordance with GAAP, less accumulated depreciation through the date of sale and any other non-cash adjustments that may be required under GAAP accounting. Management generally considers Economic Gain (Loss) to be an appropriate supplemental measure to gain (loss) on sale in accordance with GAAP because it helps investors to understand the relationship between the cash proceeds from a sale and the cash invested in the sold community. The Economic Gain (Loss) for each of the communities presented is estimated based on their respective final settlement statements. A reconciliation of Economic Gain (Loss) to gain on sale in accordance with GAAP for the quarter ended September 30, 2011 as well as prior years activities is presented on Attachment 13.
Interest Coverage is calculated by the Company as EBITDA from continuing operations, excluding land gains and gain on the sale of investments in real estate joint ventures, divided by the sum of interest expense, net, and preferred dividends. Interest Coverage is presented by the Company because it provides rating agencies and investors an additional means of comparing our ability to service debt obligations to that of other companies. EBITDA is defined by the Company as net income or loss attributable to the Company before interest income and expense, income taxes, depreciation and amortization.
A reconciliation of EBITDA and a calculation of Interest Coverage for the third quarter of 2011 are as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
Net income attributable to common stockholders |
$ 44,824 | |||
Interest expense, net |
43,970 | |||
Depreciation expense |
62,262 | |||
Depreciation expense (discontinued operations) |
474 | |||
|
|
|||
EBITDA |
$ 151,530 | |||
|
|
|||
EBITDA from continuing operations |
$ 152,864 | |||
EBITDA from discontinued operations |
(1,334) | |||
|
|
|||
EBITDA |
$ 151,530 | |||
|
|
|||
EBITDA from continuing operations |
$ 152,864 | |||
|
|
|||
Interest expense, net |
$ 43,970 | |||
|
|
|||
Interest coverage |
3.5 | |||
|
|
|
|
Attachment 14
Total Capital Cost includes all capitalized costs projected to be or actually incurred to develop the respective Development or Redevelopment Community, or Development Right, including land acquisition costs, construction costs, real estate taxes, capitalized interest and loan fees, permits, professional fees, allocated development overhead and other regulatory fees, all as determined in accordance with GAAP. For Redevelopment Communities, Total Capital Cost excludes costs incurred prior to the start of redevelopment when indicated. With respect to communities where development or redevelopment was completed in a prior or the current period, Total Capital Cost reflects the actual cost incurred, plus any contingency estimate made by management. Total Capital Cost for communities identified as having joint venture ownership, either during construction or upon construction completion, represents the total projected joint venture contribution amount. For joint ventures not in construction, Total Capital Cost is equal to gross real estate cost.
Initial Year Market Cap Rate is defined by the Company as Projected NOI of a single community for the first 12 months of operations (assuming no repositioning), less estimates for non-routine allowance of approximately $200 - $300 per apartment home, divided by the gross sales price for the community. Projected NOI, as referred to above, represents managements estimate of projected rental revenue minus projected operating expenses before interest, income taxes (if any), depreciation, amortization and extraordinary items. For this purpose, managements projection of operating expenses for the community includes a management fee of 3.0% - 3.5%. The Initial Year Market Cap Rate, which may be determined in a different manner by others, is a measure frequently used in the real estate industry when determining the appropriate purchase price for a property or estimating the value for a property. Buyers may assign different Initial Year Market Cap Rates to different communities when determining the appropriate value because they (i) may project different rates of change in operating expenses and capital expenditure estimates and (ii) may project different rates of change in future rental revenue due to different estimates for changes in rent and occupancy levels. The weighted average Initial Year Market Cap Rate is weighted based on the gross sales price of each community.
Unleveraged IRR on sold communities refers to the internal rate of return calculated by the Company considering the timing and amounts of (i) total revenue during the period owned by the Company and (ii) the gross sales price net of selling costs, offset by (iii) the undepreciated capital cost of the communities at the time of sale and (iv) total direct operating expenses during the period owned by the Company. Each of the items (i), (ii), (iii) and (iv) are calculated in accordance with GAAP.
The calculation of Unleveraged IRR does not include an adjustment for the Companys general and administrative expense, interest expense, or corporate-level property management and other indirect operating expenses. Therefore, Unleveraged IRR is not a substitute for Net Income as a measure of our performance. Management believes that the Unleveraged IRR achieved during the period a community is owned by the Company is useful because it is one indication of the gross value created by the Companys acquisition, development or redevelopment, management and sale of a community, before the impact of indirect expenses and Company overhead. The Unleveraged IRR achieved on the communities as cited in this release should not be viewed as an indication of the gross value created with respect to other communities owned by the Company, and the Company does not represent that it will achieve similar Unleveraged IRRs upon the disposition of other communities. The weighted average Unleveraged IRR for sold communities is weighted based on all cash flows over the holding period for each respective community, including net sales proceeds.
Unencumbered NOI as calculated by the Company represents NOI generated by real estate assets unencumbered by outstanding secured debt as a percentage of total NOI generated by real estate assets. The Company believes that current and prospective unsecured creditors of the Company view Unencumbered NOI as one indication of the borrowing capacity of the Company. Therefore, when reviewed together with the Companys Interest Coverage, EBITDA and cash flow from operations, the Company believes that investors and creditors view Unencumbered NOI as a useful supplemental measure for determining the financial flexibility of an entity. A calculation of Unencumbered NOI for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 is as follows (dollars in thousands):
Attachment 14
|
|
NOI for Established Communities |
$ | 354,193 | ||
NOI for Other Stabilized Communities |
65,604 | |||
NOI for Development/Redevelopment Communities |
63,143 | |||
NOI for discontinued operations |
(3,853) | |||
|
|
|||
Total NOI generated by real estate assets |
479,087 | |||
NOI on encumbered assets |
146,368 | |||
|
|
|||
NOI on unencumbered assets |
332,719 | |||
|
|
|||
Unencumbered NOI |
69% | |||
|
|
|
|
Established Communities are identified by the Company as communities where a comparison of operating results from the prior year to the current year is meaningful, as these communities were owned and had Stabilized Operations, as defined below, as of the beginning of the prior year. Therefore, for 2011, Established Communities are consolidated communities that have Stabilized Operations as of January 1, 2010 and are not conducting or planning to conduct substantial redevelopment activities within the current year. Established Communities do not include communities that are currently held for sale or planned for disposition during the current year.
Other Stabilized Communities are completed consolidated communities that the Company owns, which did not have stabilized operations as of January 1, 2010, but have stabilized occupancy as of January 1, 2011. Other Stabilized Communities do not include communities that are planning to conduct substantial redevelopment activities or that are planned for disposition within the current year.
Development Communities are communities that are under construction during the current year. These communities may be partially or fully complete and operating.
Redevelopment Communities are communities where the Company owns a majority interest and where substantial redevelopment is in progress or is planned to begin during the current year. Redevelopment is generally considered substantial when capital invested during the reconstruction effort is expected to exceed either $5,000,000 or 10% of the communitys pre-development basis and is expected to have a material impact on the communitys operations, including occupancy levels and future rental rates.
Average Rental Rates are calculated by the Company as rental revenue in accordance with GAAP, divided by the weighted average number of occupied apartment homes.
Economic Occupancy is defined as total possible revenue less vacancy loss as a percentage of total possible revenue. Total possible revenue is determined by valuing occupied units at contract rates and vacant units at Market Rents. Vacancy loss is determined by valuing vacant units at current Market Rents. By measuring vacant apartments at their Market Rents, Economic Occupancy takes into account the fact that apartment homes of different sizes and locations within a community have different economic impacts on a communitys gross revenue.
Market Rents as reported by the Company are based on the current market rates set by the managers of the Companys communities based on their experience in renting their communities apartments and publicly available market data. Trends in market rents for a region as reported by others could vary. Market Rents for a period are based on the average Market Rents during that period and do not reflect any impact for cash concessions.
Non-Revenue Generating Capex represents capital expenditures that will not directly result in revenue earnings or expense savings.
Stabilized/Restabilized Operations is defined as the earlier of (i) attainment of 95% physical occupancy or (ii) the one-year anniversary of completion of development or redevelopment.
Average Rent per Home as calculated for certain Development and Redevelopment Communities in lease-up, reflects managements projected stabilized rents net of estimated stabilized concessions and including estimated stabilized other rental revenue. Projected stabilized rents are based on one or more of the following: (i) actual average leased rents on apartments leased through quarter end; (ii) projected rollover rents on apartments leased
Attachment 14
through quarter end where the lease term expires within the first twelve months of Stabilized Operations, and Market Rents on unleased homes.
Development Rights are development opportunities in the early phase of the development process for which the Company either has an option to acquire land or enter into a leasehold interest, for which the Company is the buyer under a long-term conditional contract to purchase land or where the Company controls the land through a ground lease or owns land to develop a new community. The Company capitalizes related pre-development costs incurred in pursuit of new developments for which future development is probable.