EX-99.2
Published on August 3, 2010
SECOND QUARTER 2010
Supplemental Operating and Financial Data
Table of Contents
Company Profile |
||
Selected Operating and Other Information
|
Attachment 1 | |
Detailed Operating Information
|
Attachment 2 | |
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
Attachment 3 | |
Sequential Operating Information by Business Segment
|
Attachment 4 | |
Sub-Market Profile |
||
Quarterly Revenue and Occupancy Changes (Established Communities)
|
Attachment 5 | |
Sequential Quarterly Revenue and Occupancy Changes (Established Communities)
|
Attachment 6 | |
Year-to-Date Revenue and Occupancy Changes (Established Communities)
|
Attachment 7 | |
Operating Expenses (Opex) (Established Communities)
|
Attachment 8 | |
Development, Redevelopment, Acquisition and Disposition Profile |
||
Development Communities
|
Attachment 9 | |
Redevelopment Communities
|
Attachment 10 | |
Summary of Development and Redevelopment Community Activity
|
Attachment 11 | |
Future Development
|
Attachment 12 | |
Summary of Disposition Activity
|
Attachment 13 | |
Definitions and Reconciliations |
||
Definitions and Reconciliations of Non-GAAP Financial Measures and Other Terms
|
Attachment 14 |
The following is a Safe Harbor Statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act
of 1995, Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The projections and estimates contained in the following
attachments are forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties, and actual results
may differ materially from those projected in such statements. Risks associated with the Companys
development, redevelopment, construction, and lease-up activities, which could impact the
forward-looking statements made, are discussed in the paragraph titled Forward-Looking Statements
in the release to which these attachments relate. In particular, development opportunities may be
abandoned; Total Capital Cost of a community may exceed original estimates, possibly making the
community uneconomical and/or affecting projected returns; construction and lease-up may not be
completed on schedule, resulting in increased debt service and construction costs; and other risks
described in the Companys filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the
Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 and the Companys
Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for subsequent quarters.
Attachment
1
AvalonBay Communities, Inc.
Selected Operating and Other Information
June 30, 2010
(Dollars in thousands excepts per share data)
(unaudited)
Selected Operating and Other Information
June 30, 2010
(Dollars in thousands excepts per share data)
(unaudited)
SELECTED
OPERATING INFORMATION
Q2 | Q2 | YTD | YTD | |||||||||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | % Change | 2010 | 2009 | % Change | |||||||||||||||||||
Net income attributable to
common stockholders |
$ | 51,125 | $ | 17,674 | 189.3 | % | $ | 123,648 | $ | 65,099 | 89.9 | % | ||||||||||||
Per common share basic |
$ | 0.61 | $ | 0.22 | 177.3 | % | $ | 1.49 | $ | 0.82 | 81.7 | % | ||||||||||||
Per common share diluted |
$ | 0.61 | $ | 0.22 | 177.3 | % | $ | 1.49 | $ | 0.82 | 81.7 | % | ||||||||||||
Funds from Operations |
$ | 87,803 | $ | 71,814 | 22.3 | % | $ | 167,060 | $ | 172,789 | (3.3 | %) | ||||||||||||
Per common share diluted |
$ | 1.04 | $ | 0.90 | 15.6 | % | $ | 2.01 | $ | 2.16 | (6.9 | %) | ||||||||||||
Dividends declared common |
$ | 75,933 | $ | 71,339 | 6.4 | % | $ | 149,737 | $ | 142,631 | 5.0 | % | ||||||||||||
Per common share |
$ | 0.8925 | $ | 0.8925 | 0.0 | % | $ | 1.7850 | $ | 1.7850 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||
Common shares outstanding |
85,078,734 | 79,931,385 | 6.4 | % | 85,078,734 | 79,931,385 | 6.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Outstanding operating partnership
units |
15,351 | 15,351 | 0.0 | % | 15,351 | 15,351 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total outstanding shares and units |
85,094,085 | 79,946,736 | 6.4 | % | 85,094,085 | 79,946,736 | 6.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Average shares and participating
securities outstanding basic |
83,751,877 | 79,913,565 | 4.8 | % | 82,829,844 | 79,462,086 | 4.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Weighted shares basic |
83,517,908 | 79,662,223 | 4.8 | % | 82,583,638 | 79,210,349 | 4.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Average operating partnership units
outstanding |
15,351 | 15,888 | (3.4 | %) | 15,351 | 17,648 | (13.0 | %) | ||||||||||||||||
Effect of dilutive securities |
711,846 | 364,183 | 95.5 | % | 649,006 | 670,290 | (3.2 | %) | ||||||||||||||||
Average shares outstanding diluted |
84,245,105 | 80,042,294 | 5.3 | % | 83,247,995 | 79,898,287 | 4.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||
DEBT COMPOSITION AND MATURITIES
Average | ||||||||||||||||
Interest | Remaining | |||||||||||||||
Debt Composition (1) | Amount | Rate (2) | Maturities (1) | |||||||||||||
Conventional Debt |
2010 | $ | 121,085 | |||||||||||||
Long-term, fixed rate |
$ | 2,828,954 | 2011 | $ | 237,286 | |||||||||||
Long-term, variable rate |
354,486 | 2012 | $ | 503,259 | ||||||||||||
Variable rate facilities (3) |
| 2013 | $ | 379,573 | ||||||||||||
Subtotal, Conventional |
3,183,440 | 5.8 | % | 2014 | $ | 198,869 | ||||||||||
Tax-Exempt Debt |
||||||||||||||||
Long-term, fixed rate |
93,986 | |||||||||||||||
Long-term, variable rate |
671,964 | |||||||||||||||
Subtotal, Tax-Exempt |
765,950 | 3.2 | % | |||||||||||||
Total Debt |
$ | 3,949,390 | 5.3 | % | ||||||||||||
(1) | Excludes debt associated with assets classified as held for sale. | |
(2) | Includes costs of financing such as credit enhancement fees, trustees fees, etc. | |
(3) | Represents the Companys $1 billion unsecured credit facility, under which no amounts were drawn at June 30, 2010. |
CAPITALIZED COSTS
Non-Rev | ||||||||||||
Cap | Cap | Capex | ||||||||||
Interest | Overhead | per Home | ||||||||||
Q210 |
$ | 9,655 | $ | 5,406 | $ | 106 | ||||||
Q110 |
$ | 9,836 | $ | 5,491 | $ | 38 | ||||||
Q409 |
$ | 10,303 | $ | 6,135 | $ | 193 | ||||||
Q309 |
$ | 11,878 | $ | 5,680 | $ | 59 | ||||||
Q209 |
$ | 13,677 | $ | 6,610 | $ | 32 |
COMMUNITY INFORMATION
Apartment | ||||||||
Communities | Homes | |||||||
Current Communities |
164 | 47,401 | ||||||
Development Communities |
7 | 2,509 | ||||||
Development Rights |
28 | 7,329 |
Attachment 2
AvalonBay Communities, Inc.
Detailed Operating Information
June 30, 2010
(Dollars in thousands except per share data)
(unaudited)
Detailed Operating Information
June 30, 2010
(Dollars in thousands except per share data)
(unaudited)
Q2 | Q2 | YTD | YTD | |||||||||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | % Change | 2010 | 2009 | % Change | |||||||||||||||||||
Revenue: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rental and other income |
$ | 218,784 | $ | 210,182 | 4.1 | % | $ | 432,522 | $ | 418,447 | 3.4 | % | ||||||||||||
Management, development and other fees |
1,684 | 2,077 | (18.9 | %) | 3,533 | 3,545 | (0.3 | %) | ||||||||||||||||
Total |
220,468 | 212,259 | 3.9 | % | 436,055 | 421,992 | 3.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Direct property operating expenses,
excluding property taxes |
55,133 | 53,179 | 3.7 | % | 109,567 | 103,906 | 5.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Property taxes |
23,175 | 19,945 | 16.2 | % | 46,347 | 40,831 | 13.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Property management and other indirect
operating expenses |
9,262 | 9,634 | (3.9 | %) | 18,316 | 19,678 | (6.9 | %) | ||||||||||||||||
Total operating expenses |
87,570 | 82,758 | 5.8 | % | 174,230 | 164,415 | 6.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Interest expense, net |
(41,458 | ) | (36,880 | ) | 12.4 | % | (83,999 | ) | (67,010 | ) | 25.4 | % | ||||||||||||
Gain on extinguishment of debt, net |
| | N/A | | 1,062 | (100.0 | %) | |||||||||||||||||
General and administrative expense |
(4,041 | ) | (5,390 | ) | (25.0 | %) | (12,936 | ) | (12,637 | ) | 2.4 | % | ||||||||||||
Joint venture income |
463 | 492 | (5.9 | %) | 689 | 3,949 | (82.6 | %) | ||||||||||||||||
Investments and investment management expense |
(1,047 | ) | (907 | ) | 15.4 | % | (2,086 | ) | (1,822 | ) | 14.5 | % | ||||||||||||
Expensed development and other pursuit costs |
(443 | ) | (2,281 | ) | (80.6 | %) | (947 | ) | (3,375 | ) | (71.9 | %) | ||||||||||||
Depreciation expense |
(57,479 | ) | (51,174 | ) | 12.3 | % | (113,574 | ) | (101,247 | ) | 12.2 | % | ||||||||||||
Impairment loss |
| (20,302 | ) | (100.0 | %) | | (20,302 | ) | (100.0 | %) | ||||||||||||||
Income from continuing operations |
28,893 | 13,059 | 121.2 | % | 48,972 | 56,195 | (12.9 | %) | ||||||||||||||||
Income from discontinued operations (1) |
244 | 3,664 | (93.3 | %) | 2,240 | 7,629 | (70.6 | %) | ||||||||||||||||
Gain on sale of communities |
21,929 | | 100.0 | % | 72,220 | | 100.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total discontinued operations |
22,173 | 3,664 | 505.2 | % | 74,460 | 7,629 | 876.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Net income |
51,066 | 16,723 | 205.4 | % | 123,432 | 63,824 | 93.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Net income attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interests |
59 | 951 | (93.8 | %) | 216 | 1,275 | (83.1 | %) | ||||||||||||||||
Net income attributable to common stockholders |
$ | 51,125 | $ | 17,674 | 189.3 | % | $ | 123,648 | $ | 65,099 | 89.9 | % | ||||||||||||
Net income attributable to common stockholders per common share basic |
$ | 0.61 | $ | 0.22 | 177.3 | % | $ | 1.49 | $ | 0.82 | 81.7 | % | ||||||||||||
Net income attributable to common stockholders per common share diluted |
$ | 0.61 | $ | 0.22 | 177.3 | % | $ | 1.49 | $ | 0.82 | 81.7 | % | ||||||||||||
(1) | Reflects net income for investments in real estate classified as discontinued operations as of June 30, 2010 and investments in real estate sold during the period from January 1, 2009 through June 30, 2010. The following table details income from discontinued operations for the periods shown: |
Q2 | Q2 | YTD | YTD | |||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Rental income |
$ | 548 | $ | 9,885 | $ | 3,750 | $ | 19,831 | ||||||||
Operating and other expenses |
(304 | ) | (3,153 | ) | (1,510 | ) | (6,389 | ) | ||||||||
Interest expense, net |
| (505 | ) | | (683 | ) | ||||||||||
Depreciation expense |
| (2,563 | ) | | (5,130 | ) | ||||||||||
Income from discontinued operations |
$ | 244 | $ | 3,664 | $ | 2,240 | $ | 7,629 | ||||||||
Attachment 3
AvalonBay Communities, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Dollars in thousands)
(unaudited)
(unaudited)
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Real estate |
$ | 7,703,074 | $ | 7,425,310 | ||||
Less accumulated depreciation |
(1,590,901 | ) | (1,477,772 | ) | ||||
Net operating real estate |
6,112,173 | 5,947,538 | ||||||
Construction in progress, including land |
492,156 | 531,299 | ||||||
Land held for development |
237,529 | 237,095 | ||||||
Operating real estate assets held for sale, net |
| 117,555 | ||||||
Total real estate, net |
6,841,858 | 6,833,487 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
373,721 | 105,691 | ||||||
Cash in escrow |
188,267 | 210,676 | ||||||
Resident security deposits |
21,787 | 23,646 | ||||||
Other assets |
279,211 | 284,105 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 7,704,844 | $ | 7,457,605 | ||||
Unsecured notes, net |
$ | 1,659,621 | $ | 1,658,029 | ||||
Notes payable |
2,288,913 | 2,316,843 | ||||||
Resident security deposits |
33,596 | 33,646 | ||||||
Liabilities related to assets held for sale |
| 2,669 | ||||||
Other liabilities |
378,424 | 390,494 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
$ | 4,360,554 | $ | 4,401,681 | ||||
Redeemable noncontrolling interests |
9,381 | 5,797 | ||||||
Stockholders equity |
3,334,909 | 3,050,127 | ||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
$ | 7,704,844 | $ | 7,457,605 | ||||
Attachment 4
AvalonBay Communities, Inc.
Sequential Operating Information by Business Segment (1)
June 30, 2010
(Dollars in thousands)
(unaudited)
Sequential Operating Information by Business Segment (1)
June 30, 2010
(Dollars in thousands)
(unaudited)
Total | Quarter Ended | Quarter Ended | Quarter Ended | |||||||||||||
Homes | June 30, 2010 | March 31, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||||||||||
RENTAL REVENUE |
||||||||||||||||
Established (2) |
30,672 | $ | 161,641 | $ | 159,640 | $ | 160,055 | |||||||||
Other Stabilized (2) (3) |
5,446 | 29,499 | 28,901 | 27,745 | ||||||||||||
Redevelopment (2) |
5,067 | 23,339 | 23,030 | 22,975 | ||||||||||||
Development (2) |
2,788 | 3,707 | 1,988 | 1,160 | ||||||||||||
Total Consolidated Communities |
43,973 | $ | 218,186 | $ | 213,559 | $ | 211,935 | |||||||||
OPERATING EXPENSE |
||||||||||||||||
Established |
$ | 56,230 | $ | 56,802 | $ | 56,700 | ||||||||||
Other Stabilized |
12,132 | 12,075 | 11,444 | |||||||||||||
Redevelopment |
7,466 | 7,315 | 7,812 | |||||||||||||
Development |
2,482 | 1,422 | 1,304 | |||||||||||||
Total Consolidated Communities |
$ | 78,310 | $ | 77,614 | $ | 77,260 | ||||||||||
NOI (2) |
||||||||||||||||
Established |
$ | 105,479 | $ | 102,987 | $ | 103,606 | ||||||||||
Other Stabilized |
18,146 | 16,869 | 16,855 | |||||||||||||
Redevelopment |
15,893 | 15,737 | 15,202 | |||||||||||||
Development |
1,229 | 567 | (141 | ) | ||||||||||||
Total Consolidated Communities |
$ | 140,747 | $ | 136,160 | $ | 135,522 | ||||||||||
AVERAGE REVENUE PER OCCUPIED HOME |
||||||||||||||||
Established |
$ | 1,821 | $ | 1,804 | $ | 1,813 | ||||||||||
Other Stabilized |
1,841 | 1,810 | 1,812 | |||||||||||||
Redevelopment |
1,621 | 1,603 | 1,622 | |||||||||||||
Development (4) |
2,131 | 2,266 | 1,744 | |||||||||||||
ECONOMIC OCCUPANCY |
||||||||||||||||
Established |
96.5 | % | 96.2 | % | 96.0 | % | ||||||||||
Other Stabilized |
96.1 | % | 94.3 | % | 90.1 | % | ||||||||||
Redevelopment |
94.7 | % | 94.5 | % | 93.2 | % | ||||||||||
Development |
43.2 | % | 31.3 | % | 56.2 | % | ||||||||||
STABILIZED COMMUNITIES TURNOVER 2010 / 2009 (5) |
56.6% / 64.4 | % | 42.1% / 47.2 | % | 46.3 | % |
(1) | Excludes amounts related to communities that have been sold, or that are classified as held for sale. | |
(2) | See Attachment #14 Definitions and Reconciliations of Non-GAAP Financial Measures and Other Terms. | |
(3) | Results for these communities for quarters prior to January 1, 2010 may reflect community operations prior to stabilization, including periods of lease-up, such that occupancy levels are below what would be considered stabilized. | |
(4) | Average revenue per occupied home for Development Communities includes only those assets with at least one full quarter of lease-up activity. | |
(5) | Turnover represents the annualized number of units turned over during the quarter, divided by the total number of apartment homes for communities with stabilized occupancy for the respective reporting period. |
Attachment 5
AvalonBay Communities, Inc.
Quarterly Revenue and Occupancy Changes Established Communities (1)
Quarterly Revenue and Occupancy Changes Established Communities (1)
June 30, 2010
Apartment Homes | Average Rental Rates (2) | Economic Occupancy | Rental Revenue ($000s) (3) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Q2 10 | Q2 09 | % Change | Q2 10 | Q2 09 | % Change | Q2 10 | Q2 09 | % Change | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
New England |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Boston, MA |
4,092 | $ | 1,904 | $ | 1,927 | (1.2 | %) | 96.6 | % | 95.4 | % | 1.2 | % | $ | 22,569 | $ | 22,563 | 0.0 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Fairfield-New Haven, CT |
2,350 | 1,912 | 1,983 | (3.6 | %) | 97.1 | % | 95.4 | % | 1.7 | % | 13,083 | 13,334 | (1.9 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
New England Average |
6,442 | 1,907 | 1,947 | (2.1 | %) | 96.8 | % | 95.4 | % | 1.4 | % | 35,652 | 35,897 | (0.7 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Metro NY/NJ |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
New York, NY |
2,714 | 2,627 | 2,665 | (1.4 | %) | 96.7 | % | 96.4 | % | 0.3 | % | 20,690 | 20,910 | (1.1 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
New Jersey |
2,462 | 1,865 | 1,923 | (3.0 | %) | 97.0 | % | 95.1 | % | 1.9 | % | 13,366 | 13,515 | (1.1 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Long Island, NY |
1,732 | 2,242 | 2,284 | (1.8 | %) | 96.1 | % | 95.5 | % | 0.6 | % | 11,193 | 11,329 | (1.2 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Metro NY/NJ Average |
6,908 | 2,259 | 2,303 | (1.9 | %) | 96.6 | % | 95.8 | % | 0.8 | % | 45,249 | 45,754 | (1.1 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mid-Atlantic/Midwest |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Washington Metro |
5,343 | 1,774 | 1,765 | 0.5 | % | 96.4 | % | 96.1 | % | 0.3 | % | 27,422 | 27,204 | 0.8 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Chicago, IL |
601 | 1,433 | 1,472 | (2.6 | %) | 96.6 | % | 96.2 | % | 0.4 | % | 2,496 | 2,552 | (2.2 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mid-Atlantic/Midwest Average |
5,944 | 1,740 | 1,736 | 0.2 | % | 96.4 | % | 96.1 | % | 0.3 | % | 29,918 | 29,756 | 0.5 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pacific Northwest |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Seattle, WA |
1,943 | 1,178 | 1,312 | (10.2 | %) | 96.1 | % | 93.7 | % | 2.4 | % | 6,608 | 7,167 | (7.8 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pacific Northwest Average |
1,943 | 1,178 | 1,312 | (10.2 | %) | 96.1 | % | 93.7 | % | 2.4 | % | 6,608 | 7,167 | (7.8 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Northern California |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
San Jose, CA |
2,982 | 1,729 | 1,871 | (7.6 | %) | 96.8 | % | 95.8 | % | 1.0 | % | 14,965 | 16,030 | (6.6 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Oakland-East Bay, CA |
1,569 | 1,381 | 1,469 | (6.0 | %) | 95.5 | % | 93.8 | % | 1.7 | % | 6,210 | 6,492 | (4.3 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
San Francisco, CA |
1,424 | 2,016 | 2,155 | (6.5 | %) | 97.0 | % | 94.7 | % | 2.3 | % | 8,354 | 8,721 | (4.2 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Northern California Average |
5,975 | 1,706 | 1,834 | (7.0 | %) | 96.6 | % | 95.1 | % | 1.5 | % | 29,529 | 31,243 | (5.5 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Southern California |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Los Angeles, CA |
1,780 | 1,579 | 1,687 | (6.4 | %) | 95.3 | % | 93.0 | % | 2.3 | % | 8,034 | 8,381 | (4.1 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Orange County, CA |
916 | 1,339 | 1,454 | (7.9 | %) | 95.6 | % | 92.5 | % | 3.1 | % | 3,517 | 3,694 | (4.8 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
San Diego, CA |
764 | 1,432 | 1,504 | (4.8 | %) | 95.5 | % | 93.1 | % | 2.4 | % | 3,134 | 3,212 | (2.4 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Southern California Average |
3,460 | 1,483 | 1,584 | (6.4 | %) | 95.4 | % | 92.9 | % | 2.5 | % | 14,685 | 15,287 | (3.9 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average/Total Established |
30,672 | $ | 1,821 | $ | 1,884 | (3.3 | %) | 96.5 | % | 95.3 | % | 1.2 | % | $ | 161,641 | $ | 165,104 | (2.1 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||
(1) | Established Communities are communities with stabilized operating expenses as of January 1, 2009 such that a comparison of 2009 to 2010 is meaningful. | |
(2) | Reflects the effect of concessions amortized over the average lease term. | |
(3) | With concessions reflected on a cash basis, rental revenue from Established Communities decreased 1.8% between years. |
Attachment 6
AvalonBay Communities, Inc.
*Sequential Quarterly* Revenue and Occupancy Changes Established Communities (1)
June 30, 2010
*Sequential Quarterly* Revenue and Occupancy Changes Established Communities (1)
June 30, 2010
Apartment Homes | Average Rental Rates (2) | Economic Occupancy | Rental Revenue ($000s) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Q2 10 | Q1 10 | % Change | Q2 10 | Q1 10 | % Change | Q2 10 | Q1 10 | % Change | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
New England |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Boston, MA |
4,092 | $ | 1,904 | $ | 1,904 | 0.0 | % | 96.6 | % | 95.6 | % | 1.0 | % | $ | 22,569 | $ | 22,360 | 0.9 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Fairfield-New Haven, CT |
2,350 | 1,912 | 1,888 | 1.3 | % | 97.1 | % | 96.3 | % | 0.8 | % | 13,083 | 12,822 | 2.0 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
New England Average |
6,442 | 1,907 | 1,899 | 0.4 | % | 96.8 | % | 95.9 | % | 0.9 | % | 35,652 | 35,182 | 1.3 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Metro NY/NJ |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
New York, NY |
2,714 | 2,627 | 2,562 | 2.5 | % | 96.7 | % | 96.3 | % | 0.4 | % | 20,690 | 20,093 | 3.0 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
New Jersey |
2,462 | 1,865 | 1,849 | 0.9 | % | 97.0 | % | 96.4 | % | 0.6 | % | 13,366 | 13,171 | 1.5 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Long Island, NY |
1,732 | 2,242 | 2,199 | 2.0 | % | 96.1 | % | 96.4 | % | (0.3 | %) | 11,193 | 11,020 | 1.6 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Metro NY/NJ Average |
6,908 | 2,259 | 2,217 | 1.9 | % | 96.6 | % | 96.4 | % | 0.2 | % | 45,249 | 44,284 | 2.2 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mid-Atlantic/Midwest |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Washington Metro |
5,343 | 1,774 | 1,746 | 1.6 | % | 96.4 | % | 96.1 | % | 0.3 | % | 27,422 | 26,899 | 1.9 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Chicago, IL |
601 | 1,433 | 1,425 | 0.6 | % | 96.6 | % | 96.7 | % | (0.1 | %) | 2,496 | 2,485 | 0.4 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mid-Atlantic/Midwest Average |
5,944 | 1,740 | 1,713 | 1.6 | % | 96.4 | % | 96.2 | % | 0.2 | % | 29,918 | 29,384 | 1.8 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pacific Northwest |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Seattle, WA |
1,943 | 1,178 | 1,187 | (0.8 | %) | 96.1 | % | 95.5 | % | 0.6 | % | 6,608 | 6,613 | (0.1 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pacific Northwest Average |
1,943 | 1,178 | 1,187 | (0.8 | %) | 96.1 | % | 95.5 | % | 0.6 | % | 6,608 | 6,613 | (0.1 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Northern California |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
San Jose, CA |
2,982 | 1,729 | 1,725 | 0.2 | % | 96.8 | % | 96.7 | % | 0.1 | % | 14,965 | 14,918 | 0.3 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Oakland-East Bay, CA |
1,569 | 1,381 | 1,378 | 0.2 | % | 95.5 | % | 95.4 | % | 0.1 | % | 6,210 | 6,183 | 0.4 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
San Francisco, CA |
1,424 | 2,016 | 2,006 | 0.5 | % | 97.0 | % | 96.9 | % | 0.1 | % | 8,354 | 8,306 | 0.6 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Northern California Average |
5,975 | 1,706 | 1,701 | 0.3 | % | 96.6 | % | 96.5 | % | 0.1 | % | 29,529 | 29,407 | 0.4 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Southern California |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Los Angeles, CA |
1,780 | 1,579 | 1,572 | 0.4 | % | 95.3 | % | 96.3 | % | (1.0 | %) | 8,034 | 8,082 | (0.6 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Orange County, CA |
916 | 1,339 | 1,357 | (1.3 | %) | 95.6 | % | 95.2 | % | 0.4 | % | 3,517 | 3,548 | (0.9 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
San Diego, CA |
764 | 1,432 | 1,437 | (0.3 | %) | 95.5 | % | 95.3 | % | 0.2 | % | 3,134 | 3,140 | (0.2 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Southern California Average |
3,460 | 1,483 | 1,485 | (0.1 | %) | 95.4 | % | 95.8 | % | (0.4 | %) | 14,685 | 14,770 | (0.6 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average/Total Established |
30,672 | $ | 1,821 | $ | 1,804 | 0.9 | % | 96.5 | % | 96.2 | % | 0.3 | % | $ | 161,641 | $ | 159,640 | 1.3 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
(1) | Established Communities are communities with stabilized operating expenses as of January 1, 2009 such that a comparison of 2009 to 2010 is meaningful. | |
(2) | Reflects the effect of concessions amortized over the average lease term. |
Attachment 7
AvalonBay Communities, Inc.
Year-to-Date Revenue and Occupancy Changes Established Communities (1)
June 30, 2010
Year-to-Date Revenue and Occupancy Changes Established Communities (1)
June 30, 2010
Apartment Homes | Average Rental Rates (2) | Economic Occupancy | Rental Revenue ($000s) (3) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
YTD 10 | YTD 09 | % Change | YTD 10 | YTD 09 | % Change | YTD 10 | YTD 09 | % Change | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
New England |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Boston, MA |
4,092 | $ | 1,904 | $ | 1,930 | (1.3 | %) | 96.1 | % | 95.2 | % | 0.9 | % | $ | 44,930 | $ | 45,127 | (0.4 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Fairfield-New Haven, CT |
2,350 | 1,900 | 1,994 | (4.7 | %) | 96.7 | % | 94.7 | % | 2.0 | % | 25,904 | 26,613 | (2.7 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
New England Average |
6,442 | 1,903 | 1,954 | (2.6 | %) | 96.3 | % | 95.0 | % | 1.3 | % | 70,834 | 71,740 | (1.3 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Metro NY/NJ |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
New York, NY |
2,714 | 2,595 | 2,668 | (2.7 | %) | 96.5 | % | 95.9 | % | 0.6 | % | 40,783 | 41,674 | (2.1 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
New Jersey |
2,462 | 1,857 | 1,927 | (3.6 | %) | 96.7 | % | 95.4 | % | 1.3 | % | 26,536 | 27,162 | (2.3 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Long Island, NY |
1,732 | 2,221 | 2,292 | (3.1 | %) | 96.3 | % | 94.4 | % | 1.9 | % | 22,214 | 22,495 | (1.2 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Metro NY/NJ Average |
6,908 | 2,238 | 2,310 | (3.1 | %) | 96.5 | % | 95.4 | % | 1.1 | % | 89,533 | 91,331 | (2.0 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mid-Atlantic/Midwest |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Washington Metro |
5,343 | 1,760 | 1,761 | (0.1 | %) | 96.3 | % | 96.3 | % | 0.0 | % | 54,322 | 54,367 | (0.1 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Chicago, IL |
601 | 1,429 | 1,478 | (3.3 | %) | 96.7 | % | 95.7 | % | 1.0 | % | 4,981 | 5,098 | (2.3 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mid-Atlantic/Midwest Average |
5,944 | 1,727 | 1,734 | (0.4 | %) | 96.3 | % | 96.2 | % | 0.1 | % | 59,303 | 59,465 | (0.3 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pacific Northwest |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Seattle, WA |
1,943 | 1,183 | 1,326 | (10.8 | %) | 95.8 | % | 94.1 | % | 1.7 | % | 13,221 | 14,544 | (9.1 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pacific Northwest Average |
1,943 | 1,183 | 1,326 | (10.8 | %) | 95.8 | % | 94.1 | % | 1.7 | % | 13,221 | 14,544 | (9.1 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Northern California |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
San Jose, CA |
2,982 | 1,727 | 1,897 | (9.0 | %) | 96.7 | % | 96.0 | % | 0.7 | % | 29,883 | 32,600 | (8.3 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Oakland-East Bay, CA |
1,569 | 1,379 | 1,486 | (7.2 | %) | 95.4 | % | 94.2 | % | 1.2 | % | 12,393 | 13,191 | (6.0 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
San Francisco, CA |
1,424 | 2,011 | 2,178 | (7.7 | %) | 97.0 | % | 95.7 | % | 1.3 | % | 16,659 | 17,790 | (6.4 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Northern California Average |
5,975 | 1,704 | 1,858 | (8.3 | %) | 96.5 | % | 95.5 | % | 1.0 | % | 58,935 | 63,581 | (7.3 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Southern California |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Los Angeles, CA |
1,780 | 1,575 | 1,712 | (8.0 | %) | 95.8 | % | 92.9 | % | 2.9 | % | 16,116 | 16,987 | (5.1 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Orange County, CA |
916 | 1,348 | 1,455 | (7.4 | %) | 95.4 | % | 94.1 | % | 1.3 | % | 7,065 | 7,521 | (6.1 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
San Diego, CA |
764 | 1,434 | 1,510 | (5.0 | %) | 95.4 | % | 93.9 | % | 1.5 | % | 6,273 | 6,501 | (3.5 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Southern California Average |
3,460 | 1,484 | 1,599 | (7.2 | %) | 95.6 | % | 93.4 | % | 2.2 | % | 29,454 | 31,009 | (5.0 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average/Total Established |
30,672 | $ | 1,813 | $ | 1,892 | (4.2 | %) | 96.3 | % | 95.2 | % | 1.1 | % | $ | 321,280 | $ | 331,670 | (3.1 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||
(1) | Established Communities are communities with stabilized operating expenses as of January 1, 2009 such that a comparison of 2009 to 2010 is meaningful. | |
(2) | Reflects the effect of concessions amortized over the average lease term. | |
(3) | With concessions reflected on a cash basis, rental revenue from Established Communities decreased 2.9% between years. |
Attachment 8
AvalonBay Communities, Inc.
Operating Expenses (Opex) Established Communities (1)
June 30, 2010
(Dollars in thousands)
(unaudited)
Operating Expenses (Opex) Established Communities (1)
June 30, 2010
(Dollars in thousands)
(unaudited)
Q2 2010 | YTD 2010 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Q2 | Q2 | % of | YTD | YTD | % of | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | % Change | Total Opex | 2010 | 2009 | % Change | Total Opex | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Property taxes (2) |
$ | 17,293 | $ | 15,611 | 10.8 | % | 30.7 | % | $ | 34,681 | $ | 32,598 | 6.4 | % | 30.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Payroll (3) |
12,007 | 11,843 | 1.4 | % | 21.4 | % | 23,760 | 23,431 | 1.4 | % | 21.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Repairs & maintenance (4) |
9,733 | 8,817 | 10.4 | % | 17.3 | % | 18,430 | 16,499 | 11.7 | % | 16.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Office operations (5) |
5,460 | 6,122 | (10.8 | %) | 9.7 | % | 10,878 | 11,020 | (1.3 | %) | 9.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Utilities (6) |
5,438 | 5,909 | (8.0 | %) | 9.7 | % | 12,596 | 13,228 | (4.8 | %) | 11.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Land lease expense (7) |
3,422 | 3,425 | (0.1 | %) | 6.1 | % | 6,843 | 6,859 | (0.2 | %) | 6.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Marketing |
1,628 | 1,521 | 7.0 | % | 2.9 | % | 3,244 | 3,099 | 4.7 | % | 2.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Insurance (8) |
1,249 | 1,597 | (21.8 | %) | 2.2 | % | 2,590 | 3,355 | (22.8 | %) | 2.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total Established Communities
Operating Expenses (9) |
$ | 56,230 | $ | 54,845 | 2.5 | % | 100.0 | % | $ | 113,022 | $ | 110,089 | 2.7 | % | 100.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||
(1) | See Attachment #14 Definitions and Reconciliations of Non-GAAP Financial Measures and Other Terms. | |
(2) | The increase from the prior year periods is due primarily to a large refund received in the prior year with no comparable activity in 2010. | |
(3) | Payroll reflects expenses directly related to on-site operations. | |
(4) | Repairs & maintenance includes costs associated with preparing an apartment home for new residents including carpet and appliance replacement, as well as redecorating, landscaping, snow removal and regular maintenance costs. Increased costs over the prior year period are due to increased expenditures on carpeting, painting and landscaping to maintain the high quality appearance and amenities at our communities, as well as costs associated with the severe winter weather experienced on the East Coast in the fourth quarter of 2009 and the first quarter of 2010. | |
(5) | Office operations includes administrative costs, bad debt expense and association and license fees. The decrease from the prior year periods is due primarily to a decrease in bad debt expense. | |
(6) | Utilities represents aggregate utility costs, net of resident reimbursements. The decrease from the prior year period is due primarily to increased receipts from water submetering and lower electrical expense due largely to an initiative to install equipment that reduces energy consumption. | |
(7) | Land lease expense represents GAAP-based rental expense, which are higher than actual cash payments made. Expensed land lease payments were $2,641 and $5,218 higher than cash payments during the quarter ended and year-to-date June 30, 2010, respectively. | |
(8) | The Company renegotiated its property insurance policies in the fourth quarter of 2009, lowering premiums through April 2011. | |
(9) | Operating expenses for Established Communities excludes indirect costs for off-site corporate level property management related expenses, and other support related expenses. |
Attachment 9
AvalonBay Communities, Inc.
Development Communities as of June 30, 2010
Development Communities as of June 30, 2010
Percentage | Total | Avg | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ownership | # of | Capital | Schedule | Rent | % Occ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Upon | Apt | Cost (1) | Initial | Stabilized | Per | % Comp | % Leased | Physical | Economic | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Completion | Homes | (millions) | Start | Occupancy | Complete | Ops (1) | Home (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (1) (5) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Inclusive of Concessions See Attachment #14 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Under Construction: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1. | Avalon Fort Greene New York, NY |
100 | % | 631 | $ | 305.4 | Q4 2007 | Q4 2009 | Q4 2010 | Q2 2011 | $ | 2,725 | 65.6 | % | 63.9 | % | 56.3 | % | 34.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2. | Avalon Walnut Creek (6) Walnut Creek, CA |
100 | % | 422 | 151.7 | Q3 2008 | Q2 2010 | Q1 2011 | Q3 2011 | 1,900 | 36.7 | % | 42.2 | % | 28.7 | % | 5.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3. | Avalon Norwalk Norwalk, CT |
100 | % | 311 | 85.4 | Q3 2008 | Q2 2010 | Q2 2011 | Q4 2011 | 2,120 | 37.3 | % | 37.3 | % | 29.6 | % | 11.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4. | Avalon Towers Bellevue Bellevue, WA |
100 | % | 397 | 126.1 | Q4 2008 | Q2 2010 | Q2 2011 | Q4 2011 | 2,160 | 36.3 | % | 34.5 | % | 30.5 | % | 7.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5. | Avalon Northborough II Northborough, MA |
100 | % | 219 | 35.7 | Q4 2009 | Q1 2010 | Q4 2010 | Q2 2011 | 1,690 | 58.0 | % | 65.3 | % | 47.9 | % | 22.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6. | Avalon at West Long Branch West Long Branch, NJ |
100 | % | 180 | 28.1 | Q4 2009 | Q3 2010 | Q1 2011 | Q3 2011 | 1,815 | N/A | 5.6 | % | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7. | Avalon Rockville Centre Rockville Centre, NY |
100 | % | 349 | 110.7 | Q1 2010 | Q3 2011 | Q3 2012 | Q1 2013 | 2,615 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total/Weighted Average |
2,509 | $ | 843.1 | $ | 2,250 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted Average Projected NOI
as a % of Total Capital Cost (1) (7) |
5.7 | % |
Inclusive of Concessions See Attachment #14
Non-Stabilized Development Communities: (8)
% Economic | ||||||||||||||||
Prior Completions: |
Occ | |||||||||||||||
Avalon White Plains |
407 | $ | 153.0 | (1) (5) | ||||||||||||
Avalon Blue Hills |
276 | 46.1 | ||||||||||||||
Avalon Irvine |
279 | 77.4 | ||||||||||||||
962 | $ | 276.5 | 93.6 | % | ||||||||||||
Asset Cost Basis (millions): | Source | |||||||
Asset Under Construction and Non-Stabilized Completions |
||||||||
Capital Cost, Under Construction |
$ | 843.1 | Att. 9 | |||||
Less: Remaining to Invest, Under Construction |
(164.0 | ) | Att. 11 | |||||
Subtotal, Non-Stabilized Assets Under Construction |
679.1 | |||||||
Capital Cost, Prior Quarter Completions |
276.5 | Att. 9 | ||||||
Total Asset Cost Basis, Under Construction and Non-Stabilized Development |
$ | 955.6 | ||||||
Q2 2010 Net Operating Income/(Deficit) for communities under construction and non-stabilized
development communities was $3.9 million. See Attachment #14.
(1) | See Attachment #14 Definitions and Reconciliations of Non-GAAP Financial Measures and Other Terms. | |
(2) | Includes apartment homes for which construction has been completed and accepted by management as of July 23, 2010. | |
(3) | Includes apartment homes for which leases have been executed or non-refundable deposits have been paid as of July 23, 2010. | |
(4) | Physical occupancy based on apartment homes occupied as of July 23, 2010. | |
(5) | Represents Economic Occupancy for the second quarter of 2010. | |
(6) | This community is being financed in part by a combination of third-party tax-exempt and taxable debt. | |
(7) | The Weighted Average calculation is based on the Companys pro rata share of the Total Capital Cost for each community. | |
(8) | Represents Development Communities completed in prior quarters that had not achieved Stabilized Operations for the entire current quarter. Estimates are based on the Companys pro rata share of the Total Capital Cost for each community. |
This chart contains forward-looking statements. Please see the paragraph regarding
forward-looking statements on the Table of Contents page relating to the Companys Supplemental
Operating and Financial Data for the second quarter of 2010.
Attachment 10
AvalonBay Communities, Inc.
Redevelopment Communities as of June 30, 2010
Redevelopment Communities as of June 30, 2010
Cost (millions) | Avg | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
# of | Pre- | Total | Schedule | Rent | Homes | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Percentage | Apt | Redevelopment | Capital | Acquisition / | Restabilized | Per | Completed | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ownership | Homes | Capital Cost | Cost (1)(2) | Completion | Start | Complete | Ops (2) | Home (2) | @ 6/30/2010 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Inclusive of Concessions See Attachment #14 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Under Redevelopment: (3) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1. |
Avalon at Diamond Heights | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
San Francisco, CA | 100 | % | 154 | $ | 25.3 | $ | 30.6 | Q2 1994 | Q4 2007 | Q4 2010 | Q2 2011 | $ | 2,245 | 80 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2. |
Avalon Burbank | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Burbank, CA | 100 | % | 400 | 71.0 | 94.4 | Q2 2002 | Q3 2008 | Q3 2010 | Q1 2011 | 2,025 | 400 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3. |
Avalon Pleasanton | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pleasanton, CA | 100 | % | 456 | 63.0 | 80.9 | Q1 1994 | Q2 2009 | Q4 2011 | Q2 2012 | 1,490 | 94 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4. |
Avalon Princeton Junction (4) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
West Windsor, NJ | 100 | % | 512 | 30.2 | 49.9 | Q4 1988 | Q2 2009 | Q1 2012 | Q3 2012 | 1,490 | 113 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5. |
Avalon at Cedar Ridge | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Daly City, CA | 100 | % | 195 | 27.7 | 33.8 | Q2 1997 | Q3 2009 | Q4 2010 | Q2 2011 | 1,610 | 136 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6. |
Avalon Warm Springs (5) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fremont, CA | 100 | % | 235 | 36.5 | 44.0 | Q1 1994 | Q4 2009 | Q1 2011 | Q3 2011 | 1,480 | 7 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7. |
Avalon Summit | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Quincy, MA | 100 | % | 245 | 17.7 | 26.8 | Q3 1995 | Q2 2010 | Q4 2011 | Q2 2012 | 1,400 | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subtotal | 2,197 | $ | 271.4 | $ | 360.4 | $ | 1,640 | 830 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Completed this Quarter: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1. |
Avalon Woodland Hills | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Woodland Hills, CA | 100 | % | 663 | $ | 72.1 | $ | 110.6 | Q4 1997 | Q4 2007 | Q2 2010 | Q3 2010 | $ | 1,600 | 663 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Grand Total / Weighted Average | 2,860 | $ | 343.5 | $ | 471.0 | $ | 1,630 | 1,493 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(1) | Inclusive of acquisition cost. | |
(2) | See Attachment #14 Definitions and Reconciliations of Non-GAAP Financial Measures and Other Terms. | |
(3) | The Company commenced the redevelopment of Avalon at Prudential Center in Boston, MA and Crowne Ridge in San Rafael, CA during the second quarter 2010 for an estimated Total Capital Cost of $35.4 million. The redevelopment of these communities is primarily focused on the exterior and/or common area and is not expected to have a material impact on community operations, including occupancy, or the expected future level of rental revenue. These communities are therefore included in the Established Community portfolio and not classified as Redevelopment Communities. | |
(4) | This community was formerly known as Avalon Watch. | |
(5) | This community was formerly known as Avalon at Willow Creek. |
This chart contains forward-looking statements. Please see the paragraph regarding
forward-looking statements on the Table of Contents page relating to the
Companys Supplemental Operating and Financial Data for the second quarter of 2010.
Attachment 11
AvalonBay Communities, Inc.
Summary of Development and Redevelopment Community Activity (1) as of June 30, 2010
(Dollars in Thousands)
Summary of Development and Redevelopment Community Activity (1) as of June 30, 2010
(Dollars in Thousands)
DEVELOPMENT (2)
Apt Homes | Total Capital | Cost of Homes | Construction in | |||||||||||||||||
Completed & | Cost Invested | Completed & | Remaining to | Progress at | ||||||||||||||||
Occupied | During Period (3) | Occupied (4) | Invest (5)(6) | Period End | ||||||||||||||||
Total 2008 Actual |
2,907 | $ | 724,962 | $ | 758,238 | $ | 666,623 | $ | 820,218 | |||||||||||
2009 Actual: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Quarter 1 |
422 | $ | 124,422 | $ | 143,195 | $ | 526,116 | $ | 776,473 | |||||||||||
Quarter 2 |
719 | 128,785 | 222,384 | 395,611 | 745,907 | |||||||||||||||
Quarter 3 |
797 | 96,859 | 262,127 | 287,833 | 576,563 | |||||||||||||||
Quarter 4 |
555 | 101,306 | 181,678 | 245,046 | 500,671 | |||||||||||||||
Total 2009 Actual |
2,493 | $ | 451,372 | $ | 809,384 | |||||||||||||||
2010 Projected: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Quarter 1 (Actual) |
279 | $ | 122,151 | $ | 101,286 | $ | 228,620 | $ | 552,899 | |||||||||||
Quarter 2 (Actual) |
475 | 63,860 | 160,070 | 164,050 | 475,275 | |||||||||||||||
Quarter 3 (Projected) |
551 | 57,140 | 178,395 | 106,910 | 318,352 | |||||||||||||||
Quarter 4 (Projected) |
483 | 40,472 | 157,071 | 66,438 | 130,368 | |||||||||||||||
Total 2010 Projected |
1,788 | $ | 283,623 | $ | 596,822 | |||||||||||||||
REDEVELOPMENT
Total Capital | Reconstruction in | |||||||||||
Cost Invested | Remaining to | Progress at | ||||||||||
During Period (3) | Invest (5) | Period End | ||||||||||
Total 2008 Actual |
$ | 45,918 | $ | 53,214 | $ | 47,362 | ||||||
2009 Actual: |
||||||||||||
Quarter 1 |
$ | 12,031 | $ | 40,056 | $ | 40,477 | ||||||
Quarter 2 |
15,983 | 61,157 | 38,027 | |||||||||
Quarter 3 |
12,868 | 54,489 | 31,389 | |||||||||
Quarter 4 |
10,029 | 49,527 | 30,628 | |||||||||
Total 2009 Actual |
$ | 50,911 | ||||||||||
2010 Projected: |
||||||||||||
Quarter 1 (Actual) |
$ | 12,654 | $ | 36,873 | $ | 27,915 | ||||||
Quarter 2 (Actual) |
10,843 | 34,445 | 16,881 | |||||||||
Quarter 3 (Projected) |
12,636 | 21,809 | 16,665 | |||||||||
Quarter 4 (Projected) |
6,006 | 15,803 | 13,802 | |||||||||
Total 2010 Projected |
$ | 42,139 | ||||||||||
(1) | Data is presented for all communities currently under development or redevelopment. | |
(2) | Projected periods include data for consolidated joint ventures at 100%. The offset for joint venture partners participation is reflected as redeemable noncontrolling interest. | |
(3) | Represents Total Capital Cost incurred or expected to be incurred during the quarter, year or in total. See Attachment #14 Definitions and Reconciliations of Non-GAAP Financial Measures and Other Terms. | |
(4) | Represents projected Total Capital Cost of apartment homes completed and occupied during the quarter. Calculated by dividing Total Capital Cost for each Development Community by number of homes for the community, multiplied by the number of homes completed and occupied during the quarter. | |
(5) | Represents projected Total Capital Cost remaining to invest on communities currently under construction or reconstruction. | |
(6) | Amount for Q2 2010 includes $39.9 million expected to be financed by proceeds from third-party tax-exempt and taxable debt. |
This chart contains forward-looking statements. Please see the paragraph regarding forward-looking statements on the Table of Contents page relating to the
Companys Supplemental Operating and Financial Data for the second quarter of 2010.
Attachment 12
AvalonBay Communities, Inc.
Future Development as of June 30, 2010
Future Development as of June 30, 2010
DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (1)
Location of | Estimated | Total | ||||||||||
Development | Number | Capital Cost (1) | ||||||||||
Right | of Homes | (millions) | ||||||||||
1. | Seattle, WA |
204 | $ | 57 | ||||||||
2. | Wilton, CT |
100 | 31 | |||||||||
3. | Plymouth, MA Phase II |
91 | 18 | |||||||||
4. | Greenburgh, NY Phase II |
444 | 120 | |||||||||
5. | Lynnwood, WA Phase II |
82 | 18 | |||||||||
6. | North Bergen, NJ |
164 | 47 | |||||||||
7. | Tysons Corner, VA I |
354 | 80 | |||||||||
8. | San Francisco, CA |
173 | 65 | |||||||||
9. | Wood-Ridge, NJ Phase I |
266 | 60 | |||||||||
10. | Cohasset, MA |
220 | 52 | |||||||||
11. | New York, NY Phase I |
396 | 169 | |||||||||
12. | Boston, MA |
180 | 97 | |||||||||
13. | Garden City, NY |
160 | 51 | |||||||||
14. | Andover, MA |
115 | 27 | |||||||||
15. | Shelton, CT |
200 | 41 | |||||||||
16. | Wood-Ridge, NJ Phase II |
140 | 32 | |||||||||
17. | Brooklyn, NY |
861 | 443 | |||||||||
18. | Dublin, CA Phase II |
486 | 145 | |||||||||
19. | Stratford, CT |
130 | 25 | |||||||||
20. | Huntington Station, NY |
424 | 100 | |||||||||
21. | Tysons Corner, VA II |
338 | 87 | |||||||||
22. | Ocean Township, NJ |
309 | 57 | |||||||||
23. | New York, NY Phase II |
295 | 142 | |||||||||
24. | Seattle, WA II |
272 | 81 | |||||||||
25. | Roselle Park, NJ |
249 | 54 | |||||||||
26. | Rockville, MD |
240 | 57 | |||||||||
27. | Ossining, NY |
210 | 44 | |||||||||
28. | Hackensack, NJ |
226 | 48 | |||||||||
Total |
7,329 | $ | 2,248 | |||||||||
(1) | See Attachment #14 Definitions and Reconciliations of Non-GAAP Financial Measures and Other Terms. |
This chart contains forward-looking statements. Please see the paragraph regarding forward-looking statements on the
Table of Contents page relating to the Companys Supplemental Operating and Financial Data for the second quarter of 2010.
Attachment 13
AvalonBay Communities, Inc.
Summary of Disposition Activity (1) as of June 30, 2010
(Dollars in thousands)
Summary of Disposition Activity (1) as of June 30, 2010
(Dollars in thousands)
Accumulated | Weighted Average | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of | Gross Sales | Depreciation | Economic | Initial Year | Weighted Average | |||||||||||||||||||
Communities Sold (2) | Price | GAAP Gain | and Other | Gain (4) | Mkt. Cap Rate (3) (4) | Unleveraged IRR (3) (4) | ||||||||||||||||||
1998: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
9 Communities |
$ | 170,312 | $ | 25,270 | $ | 23,438 | $ | 1,832 | 8.1 | % | 16.2 | % | ||||||||||||
1999: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
16 Communities |
$ | 317,712 | $ | 47,093 | $ | 27,150 | $ | 19,943 | 8.3 | % | 12.1 | % | ||||||||||||
2000: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
8 Communities |
$ | 160,085 | $ | 40,779 | $ | 6,262 | $ | 34,517 | 7.9 | % | 15.3 | % | ||||||||||||
2001: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
7 Communities |
$ | 241,130 | $ | 62,852 | $ | 21,623 | $ | 41,229 | 8.0 | % | 14.3 | % | ||||||||||||
2002: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Community |
$ | 80,100 | $ | 48,893 | $ | 7,462 | $ | 41,431 | 5.4 | % | 20.1 | % | ||||||||||||
2003: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
12 Communities, 1 Land Parcel (5) |
$ | 460,600 | $ | 184,438 | $ | 52,613 | $ | 131,825 | 6.3 | % | 15.3 | % | ||||||||||||
2004: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
5 Communities, 1 Land Parcel |
$ | 250,977 | $ | 122,425 | $ | 19,320 | $ | 103,105 | 4.8 | % | 16.8 | % | ||||||||||||
2005: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
7 Communities, 1 Office Building,
3 Land Parcels (6) |
$ | 382,720 | $ | 199,767 | $ | 14,929 | $ | 184,838 | 3.8 | % | 18.0 | % | ||||||||||||
2006: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
4 Communities, 3 Land Parcels (7) |
$ | 281,485 | $ | 117,539 | $ | 21,699 | $ | 95,840 | 4.6 | % | 15.2 | % | ||||||||||||
2007: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
5 Communities, 1 Land Parcel (8) |
$ | 273,896 | $ | 163,352 | $ | 17,588 | $ | 145,764 | 4.6 | % | 17.8 | % | ||||||||||||
2008: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
11 Communities (9) |
$ | 646,200 | $ | 288,384 | $ | 56,469 | $ | 231,915 | 5.1 | % | 14.1 | % | ||||||||||||
2009: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
5 Communities, 2 Land Parcels (10) |
$ | 193,186 | $ | 68,717 | $ | 16,692 | $ | 52,025 | 6.5 | % | 13.0 | % | ||||||||||||
2010: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
3 Communities (11) |
$ | 190,450 | $ | 72,220 | $ | 48,024 | $ | 24,196 | 5.8 | % | 8.9 | % | ||||||||||||
1998 - 2010 Total |
$ | 3,648,853 | $ | 1,441,729 | $ | 333,269 | $ | 1,108,460 | 5.8 | % | 15.0 | % | ||||||||||||
(1) | Activity excludes dispositions to joint venture entities in which the Company retains an economic interest. | |
(2) | For dispositions from January 1, 1998 through June 30, 2010 the Weighted Average Holding Period is 7.9 years. | |
(3) | For purposes of this attachment, land sales and the disposition of an office building are not included in the calculation of Weighted Average Holding Period, Weighted Average Initial Year Market Cap Rate, or Weighted Average Unleveraged IRR. | |
(4) | See Attachment #14 Definitions and Reconciliations of Non-GAAP Financial Measures and Other Terms. | |
(5) | 2003 GAAP gain, for purposes of this attachment, includes $23,448 related to the sale of a community in which the Company held a 50% membership interest. | |
(6) | 2005 GAAP gain includes the recovery of an impairment loss of $3,000 recorded in 2002 related to one of the land parcels sold in 2005. This loss was recorded to reflect the land at fair value based on its entitlement status at the time it was determined to be planned for disposition. | |
(7) | 2006 GAAP gain, for purposes of this attachment, includes $6,609 related to the sale of a community in which the Company held a 25% equity interest. | |
(8) | 2007 GAAP gain, for purposes of this attachment, includes $56,320 related to the sale of a partnership interest in which the Company held a 50% equity interest. | |
(9) | 2008 GAAP gain, for purposes of this attachment, includes $3,483 related to the sale of a community held by the Fund in which the Company holds a 15.2% equity interest. | |
(10) | 2009 GAAP and Economic Gain include the settlement recognition of approximately $2,770 in deferred gains for six prior year dispositions, recognition of which occurred in conjunction with the November 2009 settlement of previously disclosed litigation with The Equal Rights Center, involving accessibility of our communities. | |
(11) | 2010 GAAP and Economic Gain include the recognition of approximately $2,300 in deferred gains from one prior year disposition, recognition of which occurred in conjunction with the April 2010 settlement of previously disclosed litigation involving the homeowners association of that community. |
Attachment 14
AvalonBay Communities, Inc.
Definitions and Reconciliations of Non-GAAP Financial Measures and Other Terms
Definitions and Reconciliations of Non-GAAP Financial Measures and Other Terms
This release, including its attachments, contains certain non-GAAP financial measures and other
terms. The definition and calculation of these non-GAAP financial measures and other terms may
differ from the definitions and methodologies used by other REITs and, accordingly, may not be
comparable. The non-GAAP financial measures referred to below should not be considered an
alternative to net income as an indication of our performance. In addition, these non-GAAP
financial measures do not represent cash generated from operating activities in accordance with
GAAP and therefore should not be considered as an alternative measure of liquidity or as indicative
of cash available to fund cash needs.
FFO is determined based on a definition adopted by the Board of Governors of the National
Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (NAREIT). FFO is calculated by the Company as Net
income or loss attributable to common stockholders computed in accordance with GAAP, adjusted for
gains or losses on sales of previously depreciated operating communities, extraordinary gains or
losses (as defined by GAAP), cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle and depreciation
of real estate assets, including adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures.
Management generally considers FFO to be an appropriate supplemental measure of operating
performance because, by excluding gains or losses related to dispositions of previously depreciated
operating communities and excluding real estate depreciation (which can vary among owners of
identical assets in similar condition based on historical cost accounting and useful life
estimates), FFO can help one compare the operating performance of a companys real estate between
periods or as compared to different companies. A reconciliation of FFO to Net income attributable
to common stockholders is as follows (dollars in thousands):
Q2 | Q2 | YTD | YTD | |||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Net income attributable to common
stockholders |
$ | 51,125 | $ | 17,674 | $ | 123,648 | $ | 65,099 | ||||||||
Depreciation real estate assets,
including discontinued operations
and joint venture adjustments |
58,593 | 54,126 | 115,605 | 107,651 | ||||||||||||
Distributions to noncontrolling interests,
including discontinued operations |
14 | 14 | 27 | 39 | ||||||||||||
Gain on sale of unconsolidated entities
holding previously depreciated real estate assets |
| | | | ||||||||||||
Gain on sale of previously depreciated
real estate assets |
(21,929 | ) | | (72,220 | ) | | ||||||||||
FFO attributable to common stockholders |
$ | 87,803 | $ | 71,814 | $ | 167,060 | $ | 172,789 | ||||||||
Average shares outstanding diluted |
84,245,105 | 80,042,294 | 83,247,995 | 79,898,287 | ||||||||||||
Earnings per share diluted |
$ | 0.61 | $ | 0.22 | $ | 1.49 | $ | 0.82 | ||||||||
FFO per common share diluted |
$ | 1.04 | $ | 0.90 | $ | 2.01 | $ | 2.16 | ||||||||
The Companys results for the quarter ended and year-to-date June 30, 2010 and the comparable
prior year periods include the non-routine items outlined in the following table:
Attachment 14 (continued)
Non-Routine Items
Decrease (Increase) in Net Income and FFO
(dollars in thousands)
Decrease (Increase) in Net Income and FFO
(dollars in thousands)
Q2 | YTD | Q2 | YTD | |||||||||||||
2009 | 2009 | 2010 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
Land impairments & abandoned
pursuits |
$ | 22,400 | $ | 22,400 | $ | | $ | | ||||||||
Severance and related costs (1) |
2,000 | 2,000 | (1,550 | ) | (1,550 | ) | ||||||||||
Gain on unsecured notes
repurchase |
| (1,062 | ) | | | |||||||||||
Joint venture income
adjustment (2) |
| (3,894 | ) | | | |||||||||||
Severe weather costs (3) |
| | | 672 | ||||||||||||
Legal settlement proceeds, net (1) |
(2,100 | ) | (2,100 | ) | (927 | ) | (927 | ) | ||||||||
Total non-routine items |
$ | 22,300 | $ | 17,344 | $ | (2,477 | ) | $ | (1,805 | ) | ||||||
Weighted average dilutive
shares outstanding |
80,042,294 | 79,898,287 | 84,245,105 | 83,247,995 |
(1) | Non-routine item for 2010 was included in the Companys Outlook provided in June 2010. | |
(2) | Reflects the Companys promoted interest of $3,894 in joint ventures | |
(3) | Costs relate to severe winter weather experienced on the East Coast in the fourth quarter of 2009 and the first quarter of 2010 |
Projected FFO, as provided within this release in the Companys outlook, is calculated
on a basis consistent with historical FFO, and is therefore considered to be an appropriate
supplemental measure to projected net income from projected operating performance. A
reconciliation of the range provided for Projected FFO per share (diluted) for the third quarter
2010 to the range provided for projected EPS (diluted) is as follows:
Low | High | |||||||
range | range | |||||||
Projected EPS (diluted) Q3 2010 |
$ | 0.22 | $ | 0.26 | ||||
Projected depreciation (real estate related) |
0.71 | 0.71 | ||||||
Projected gain on sale of operating communities |
| | ||||||
Projected FFO per share (diluted) Q3 2010 |
$ | 0.93 | $ | 0.97 | ||||
NOI is defined by the Company as total property revenue less direct property operating
expenses (including property taxes), and excludes corporate-level income (including management,
development and other fees), corporate-level property management and other indirect operating
expenses, investments and investment management expenses, expensed development and other pursuit
costs, net interest expense, gain (loss) on extinguishment of debt, general and administrative
expense, joint venture income (loss), depreciation expense, impairment loss on land holdings, gain
on sale of real estate assets and income from discontinued operations. The Company considers NOI to
be an appropriate supplemental measure to Net Income of operating performance of a community or
communities because it helps both investors and management to understand the core operations of a
community or communities prior to the allocation of corporate-level property management overhead or
general and administrative costs. This is more reflective of the operating performance of a
community, and allows for an easier comparison of the operating performance of single assets or
groups of assets. In addition, because prospective buyers of real estate have different overhead
structures, with varying marginal impact to overhead by acquiring real estate, NOI is considered by
many in the real estate industry to be a useful measure for determining the value of a real estate
asset or groups of assets.
Attachment 14 (continued)
A reconciliation of NOI (from continuing operations) to Net Income, as well as a breakdown of NOI
by operating segment, is as follows (dollars in thousands):
Q2 | Q2 | Q1 | YTD | YTD | ||||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 51,066 | $ | 16,723 | $ | 72,366 | $ | 123,432 | $ | 63,824 | ||||||||||
Indirect operating expenses, net of corporate income |
7,849 | 7,362 | 7,232 | 15,080 | 15,936 | |||||||||||||||
Investments and investment management expense |
1,047 | 907 | 1,039 | 2,086 | 1,822 | |||||||||||||||
Expensed development and other pursuit costs |
443 | 2,281 | 505 | 947 | 3,375 | |||||||||||||||
Interest expense, net |
41,458 | 36,880 | 42,541 | 83,999 | 67,010 | |||||||||||||||
(Gain) loss on extinguishment of debt, net |
| | | | (1,062 | ) | ||||||||||||||
General and administrative expense |
4,041 | 5,390 | 8,895 | 12,936 | 12,637 | |||||||||||||||
Joint venture loss (income) |
(463 | ) | (492 | ) | (227 | ) | (689 | ) | (3,949 | ) | ||||||||||
Depreciation expense |
57,479 | 51,174 | 56,095 | 113,574 | 101,247 | |||||||||||||||
Impairment loss land holdings |
| 20,302 | | | 20,302 | |||||||||||||||
Gain on sale of real estate assets |
(21,929 | ) | | (50,291 | ) | (72,220 | ) | | ||||||||||||
Income from discontinued operations |
(244 | ) | (3,664 | ) | (1,995 | ) | (2,240 | ) | (7,629 | ) | ||||||||||
NOI from continuing operations |
$ | 140,747 | $ | 136,863 | $ | 136,160 | $ | 276,905 | $ | 273,513 | ||||||||||
Established: |
||||||||||||||||||||
New England |
$ | 22,300 | $ | 22,814 | $ | 21,643 | $ | 43,944 | $ | 45,497 | ||||||||||
Metro NY/NJ |
30,589 | 32,044 | 29,507 | 60,096 | 62,628 | |||||||||||||||
Mid-Atlantic/Midwest |
18,665 | 18,528 | 17,546 | 36,211 | 37,111 | |||||||||||||||
Pacific NW |
4,249 | 4,944 | 4,426 | 8,675 | 10,150 | |||||||||||||||
No. California |
20,245 | 21,815 | 20,158 | 40,403 | 45,390 | |||||||||||||||
So. California |
9,431 | 10,224 | 9,707 | 19,137 | 20,994 | |||||||||||||||
Total Established |
105,479 | 110,369 | 102,987 | 208,466 | 221,770 | |||||||||||||||
Other Stabilized |
18,146 | 10,338 | 16,869 | 35,014 | 18,178 | |||||||||||||||
Development/Redevelopment |
17,122 | 16,156 | 16,304 | 33,425 | 33,565 | |||||||||||||||
NOI from continuing operations |
$ | 140,747 | $ | 136,863 | $ | 136,160 | $ | 276,905 | $ | 273,513 | ||||||||||
NOI as reported by the Company does not include the operating results from discontinued
operations (i.e., assets sold during the period January 1, 2009 through June 30, 2010 or classified
as held for sale at June 30, 2010). A reconciliation of NOI from communities sold or classified as
discontinued operations to net income for these communities is as follows (dollars in thousands):
Q2 | Q2 | YTD | YTD | |||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Income from discontinued operations |
$ | 244 | $ | 3,664 | $ | 2,240 | $ | 7,629 | ||||||||
Interest expense, net |
| 505 | | 683 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation expense |
| 2,563 | | 5,130 | ||||||||||||
NOI from discontinued operations |
$ | 244 | $ | 6,732 | $ | 2,240 | $ | 13,442 | ||||||||
NOI from assets sold |
$ | 244 | $ | 6,732 | $ | 2,240 | $ | 13,442 | ||||||||
NOI from assets held for sale |
| | | | ||||||||||||
NOI from discontinued operations |
$ | 244 | $ | 6,732 | $ | 2,240 | $ | 13,442 | ||||||||
Projected NOI, as used within this release for certain Development Communities and in
calculating the Initial Year Market Cap Rate for dispositions, represents managements estimate, as
of the date of this release (or as of the date of the buyers valuation in the case of
dispositions), of projected stabilized rental revenue minus projected stabilized operating
expenses. For Development Communities, Projected NOI is calculated based on the first year of
Stabilized Operations, as defined below, following the completion of construction. In calculating
the Initial Year Market Cap Rate, Projected NOI for dispositions is calculated for the first twelve
months following the date of the buyers valuation. Projected stabilized rental revenue represents
managements estimate of projected gross potential (based on leased rents for occupied homes and
Market Rents, as defined below, for vacant homes) minus projected
Attachment 14 (continued)
economic vacancy and adjusted for concessions. Projected stabilized operating expenses do not
include interest, income taxes (if any), depreciation or amortization, or any allocation of
corporate-level property management overhead or general and administrative costs. The weighted
average Projected NOI as a percentage of Total Capital Cost is weighted based on the Companys
share of the Total Capital Cost of each community, based on its percentage ownership.
Management believes that Projected NOI of the Development Communities, on an aggregated weighted
average basis, assists investors in understanding managements estimate of the likely impact on
operations of the Development Communities when the assets are complete and achieve stabilized
occupancy (before allocation of any corporate-level property management overhead, general and
administrative costs or interest expense). However, in this release the Company has not given a
projection of NOI on a company-wide basis. Given the different dates and fiscal years for which
NOI is projected for these communities, the projected allocation of corporate-level property
management overhead, general and administrative costs and interest expense to communities under
development is complex, impractical to develop, and may not be meaningful. Projected NOI of these
communities is not a projection of the Companys overall financial performance or cash flow. There
can be no assurance that the communities under development or redevelopment will achieve the
Projected NOI as described in this release.
Rental Revenue with Concessions on a Cash Basis is considered by the Company to be a
supplemental measure to rental revenue in conformity with GAAP to help investors evaluate the
impact of both current and historical concessions on GAAP based rental revenue and to more readily
enable comparisons to revenue as reported by other companies. In addition, rental revenue (with
concessions on a cash basis) allows an investor to understand the historical trend in cash
concessions.
A reconciliation of rental revenue from Established Communities in conformity with GAAP to rental
revenue (with concessions on a cash basis) is as follows (dollars in thousands):
Q2 | Q2 | YTD | YTD | |||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Rental revenue (GAAP basis) |
$ | 161,641 | $ | 165,104 | $ | 321,280 | $ | 331,670 | ||||||||
Concessions amortized |
1,146 | 2,724 | 2,746 | 5,632 | ||||||||||||
Concessions granted |
(475 | ) | (2,567 | ) | (1,069 | ) | (4,775 | ) | ||||||||
Rental revenue (with
concessions on a cash basis) |
$ | 162,312 | $ | 165,261 | $ | 322,957 | $ | 332,527 | ||||||||
% change GAAP revenue |
(2.1 | %) | (3.1 | %) | ||||||||||||
% change cash revenue |
(1.8 | %) | (2.9 | %) |
Economic Gain (Loss) is calculated by the Company as the gain (loss) on sale in
accordance with GAAP, less accumulated depreciation through the date of sale and any other non-cash
adjustments that may be required under GAAP accounting. Management generally considers Economic
Gain (Loss) to be an appropriate supplemental measure to gain (loss) on sale in accordance with
GAAP because it helps investors to understand the relationship between the cash proceeds from a
sale and the cash invested in the sold community. The Economic Gain (Loss) for each of the
communities presented is estimated based on their respective final settlement statements. A
reconciliation of Economic Gain (Loss) to gain on sale in accordance with GAAP for both the three
months ended June 30, 2010 as well as prior years activities is presented on Attachment 13.
Interest Coverage is calculated by the Company as EBITDA from continuing operations,
excluding land gains and gain on the sale of investments in real estate joint ventures, divided by
the sum of interest expense, net, and preferred dividends. Interest Coverage is presented by the
Company because it provides rating agencies and investors an additional means of comparing our
ability to service debt obligations to that of other companies. EBITDA is defined by the Company
as net income attributable to the Company before interest income and expense, income taxes,
depreciation and amortization.
Attachment 14 (continued)
A reconciliation of EBITDA and a calculation of Interest Coverage for the second quarter of 2010
are as follows (dollars in thousands):
Net income attributable to the Company |
$ | 51,125 | ||
Interest expense, net |
41,458 | |||
Depreciation expense |
57,479 | |||
EBITDA |
$ | 150,062 | ||
EBITDA from continuing operations |
$ | 127,889 | ||
EBITDA from discontinued operations |
22,173 | |||
EBITDA |
$ | 150,062 | ||
EBITDA from continuing operations |
$ | 127,889 | ||
Interest charges |
$ | 41,458 | ||
Interest coverage |
3.1 | |||
Total Capital Cost includes all capitalized costs projected to be or actually incurred
to develop the respective Development or Redevelopment Community, or Development Right, including
land acquisition costs, construction costs, real estate taxes, capitalized interest and loan fees,
permits, professional fees, allocated development overhead and other regulatory fees, all as
determined in accordance with GAAP. For Redevelopment Communities, Total Capital Cost excludes
costs incurred prior to the start of redevelopment when indicated. With respect to communities
where development or redevelopment was completed in a prior or the current period, Total Capital
Cost reflects the actual cost incurred, plus any contingency estimate made by management. Total
Capital Cost for communities identified as having joint venture ownership, either during
construction or upon construction completion, represents the total projected joint venture
contribution amount. For joint ventures not in construction, Total Capital Cost is equal to gross
real estate cost.
Initial Year Market Cap Rate is defined by the Company as Projected NOI of a single
community for the first 12 months of operations (assuming no repositioning), less estimates for
non-routine allowance of approximately $200 $300 per apartment home, divided by the gross sales
price for the community. Projected NOI, as referred to above, represents managements estimate of
projected rental revenue minus projected operating expenses before interest, income taxes (if any),
depreciation, amortization and extraordinary items. For this purpose, managements projection of
operating expenses for the community includes a management fee of 3.0% 3.5%. The Initial Year
Market Cap Rate, which may be determined in a different manner by others, is a measure frequently
used in the real estate industry when determining the appropriate purchase price for a property or
estimating the value for a property. Buyers may assign different Initial Year Market Cap Rates to
different communities when determining the appropriate value because they (i) may project different
rates of change in operating expenses and capital expenditure estimates and (ii) may project
different rates of change in future rental revenue due to different estimates for changes in rent
and occupancy levels. The weighted average Initial Year Market Cap Rate is weighted based on the
gross sales price of each community.
Unleveraged IRR on sold communities refers to the internal rate of return calculated by the
Company considering the timing and amounts of (i) total revenue during the period owned by the
Company and (ii) the gross sales price net of selling costs, offset by (iii) the undepreciated
capital cost of the communities at the time of sale and (iv) total direct operating expenses during
the period owned by the Company. Each of the items (i), (ii), (iii) and (iv) are calculated in
accordance with GAAP.
The calculation of Unleveraged IRR does not include an adjustment for the Companys general and
administrative expense, interest expense, or corporate-level property management and other indirect
operating expenses. Therefore, Unleveraged IRR is not a substitute for Net Income as a measure of
our performance. Management
Attachment 14 (continued)
believes that the Unleveraged IRR achieved during the period a community is owned by the Company is
useful because it is one indication of the gross value created by the Companys acquisition,
development or redevelopment, management and sale of a community, before the impact of indirect
expenses and Company overhead. The Unleveraged IRR achieved on the communities as cited in this
release should not be viewed as an indication of the gross value created with respect to other
communities owned by the Company, and the Company does not represent that it will achieve similar
Unleveraged IRRs upon the disposition of other communities. The weighted average Unleveraged IRR
for sold communities is weighted based on all cash flows over the holding period for each
respective community, including net sales proceeds.
Unencumbered NOI as calculated by the Company represents NOI generated by real estate
assets unencumbered by either outstanding secured debt or land leases (excluding land leases with
purchase options that were put in place for governmental incentives or tax abatements) as a
percentage of total NOI generated by real estate assets. The Company believes that current and
prospective unsecured creditors of the Company view Unencumbered NOI as one indication of the
borrowing capacity of the Company. Therefore, when reviewed together with the Companys Interest
Coverage, EBITDA and cash flow from operations, the Company believes that investors and creditors
view Unencumbered NOI as a useful supplemental measure for determining the financial flexibility of
an entity. A calculation of Unencumbered NOI for the six months ended June 30, 2010 is as follows
(dollars in thousands):
NOI for Established Communities |
$ | 208,466 | ||
NOI for Other Stabilized Communities |
35,014 | |||
NOI for Development/Redevelopment Communities |
33,425 | |||
Total NOI generated by real estate assets |
276,905 | |||
NOI on encumbered assets |
91,732 | |||
NOI on unencumbered assets |
185,173 | |||
Unencumbered NOI |
67 | % | ||
Established Communities are identified by the Company as communities where a comparison
of operating results from the prior year to the current year is meaningful, as these communities
were owned and had Stabilized Operations, as defined below, as of the beginning of the prior year.
Therefore, for 2010, Established Communities are consolidated communities that have Stabilized
Operations as of January 1, 2009 and are not conducting or planning to conduct substantial
redevelopment activities within the current year. Established Communities do not include
communities that are currently held for sale or planned for disposition during the current year.
Other Stabilized Communities are completed consolidated communities that the Company owns,
which did not have stabilized operations as of January 1, 2009, but have stabilized occupancy as of
January 1, 2010. Other Stabilized Communities do not include communities that are planning to
conduct substantial redevelopment activities or that are planned for disposition within the current
year.
Development Communities are communities that are under construction during the current
year. These communities may be partially or fully complete and operating.
Redevelopment Communities are communities where the Company owns a majority interest and
where substantial redevelopment is in progress or is planned to begin during the current year.
Redevelopment is considered substantial when capital invested during the reconstruction effort is
expected to exceed either $5,000,000 or 10% of the communitys pre-development basis and is
expected to have a material impact on the communitys operations, including occupancy levels and
future rental rates.
Average Rental Rates are calculated by the Company as rental revenue in accordance with
GAAP, divided by the weighted average number of occupied apartment homes.
Economic Occupancy is defined as total possible revenue less vacancy loss as a percentage
of total possible revenue. Total possible revenue is determined by valuing occupied units at
contract rates and vacant units at Market Rents. Vacancy loss is determined by valuing vacant
units at current Market Rents. By measuring vacant apartments at their Market Rents, Economic
Occupancy takes into account the fact that apartment homes of different sizes and locations within
a community have different economic impacts on a communitys gross revenue.
Attachment 14 (continued)
Market Rents as reported by the Company are based on the current market rates set by the
managers of the Companys communities based on their experience in renting their communities
apartments and publicly available market data. Trends in market rents for a region as reported by
others could vary. Market Rents for a period are based on the average Market Rents during that
period and do not reflect any impact for cash concessions.
Non-Revenue Generating Capex represents capital expenditures that will not directly result
in revenue earnings or expense savings.
Stabilized/Restabilized Operations is defined as the earlier of (i) attainment of 95%
physical occupancy or (ii) the one-year anniversary of completion of development or redevelopment.
Average Rent per Home, as calculated for certain Development and Redevelopment Communities
in lease-up, reflects (i) actual average leased rents for those apartments leased through the end
of the quarter net of estimated stabilized concessions, (ii) estimated market rents net of
comparable concessions for all unleased apartments and (iii) includes actual and estimated other
rental revenue. For Development and Redevelopment Communities not yet in lease-up, Average Rent
per Home reflects managements projected rents.
Development Rights are development opportunities in the early phase of the development
process for which the Company either has an option to acquire land or enter into a leasehold
interest, for which the Company is the buyer under a long-term conditional contract to purchase
land or where the Company owns land to develop a new community. The Company capitalizes related
pre-development costs incurred in pursuit of new developments for which future development is
probable.